Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 16, 2026.

Implications of the Hybrid Epithelial/Mesenchymal Phenotype in Metastasis

Mohit Kumar Jolly

Frontiers in Oncology · 2015 · Review

doi:10.3389/fonc.2015.00155

Abstract

Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes - the epithelial to -mesenchymal transition (EMT) and its reverse the mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) - are hallmarks of cancer metastasis. While transitioning between the epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes, cells can also attain a hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal (E/M) (i.e., partial or intermediate EMT) phenotype. Cells in this phenotype have mixed epithelial (e.g., adhesion) and mesenchymal (e.g., migration) properties, thereby allowing them to move collectively as clusters. If these clusters reach the bloodstream intact, they can give rise to clusters of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), as have often been seen experimentally. Here, we review the operating principles of the core regulatory network for EMT/MET that acts as a "three-way" switch giving rise to three distinct phenotypes - E, M and hybrid E/M - and present a theoretical framework that can elucidate the role of many other players in regulating epithelial plasticity. Furthermore, we highlight recent studies on partial EMT and its association with drug resistance and tumor-initiating potential; and discuss how cell-cell communication between cells in a partial EMT phenotype can enable the formation of clusters of CTCs. These clusters can be more apoptosis-resistant and have more tumor-initiating potential than singly moving CTCs with a wholly mesenchymal (complete EMT) phenotype. Also, more such clusters can be formed under inflammatory conditions that are often generated by various therapies. Finally, we discuss the multiple advantages that the partial EMT or hybrid E/M phenotype have as compared to a complete EMT phenotype and argue that these collectively migrating cells are the primary "bad actors" of metastasis.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 230

  1. 1.

    Hanahan D Weinberg RA Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell (2011 ) 144:646–74.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013

  2. 2.

    Lamouille S Xu J Derynck R Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2014 ) 15:178–96.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm3758

  3. 3.

    De Craene B Berx G. Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression. Nat Rev Cancer (2013 ) 13:97–110.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc3447

  4. 4.

    Christiansen JJ Rajasekaran AK. Reassessing epithelial to mesenchymal transition as a prerequisite for carcinoma invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res (2006 ) 66:8319–26.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0410

  5. 5.

    Kalluri R Weinberg RA. Review series the basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest (2009 ) 119:1420–8.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci39104

  6. 6.

    Nieto MA. Epithelial plasticity: a common theme in embryonic and cancer cells. Science (2013 ) 342:1234850.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1234850

  7. 7.

    Gupta GP Massagué J Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell (2006 ) 127:679–95.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.001

  8. 8.

    Revenu C Gilmour D. EMT 2.0: shaping epithelia through collective migration. Curr Opin Genet Dev (2009 ) 19:338–42.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2009.04.007

  9. 9.

    Micalizzi DS Farabaugh SM Ford HL. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: parallels between normal development and tumor progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia (2010 ) 15:117–34.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10911-010-9178-9

  10. 10.

    Arnoux V Côme C Kusewitt DF Hudson LG Savagner P Cutaneous wound reepithelialization. In: Savagner P, editor. Rise and Fall of Epithelial Phenotype. Berlin: Springer (2005 ). p. 111–34.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Klymkowsky MW Savagner P. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: a cancer researcher’s conceptual friend and foe. Am J Pathol (2009 ) 174:1588–93.

    Not in our library10.2353/ajpath.2009.080545

  12. 12.
  13. 13.

    Hou J-M Krebs M Ward T Sloane R Priest L Hughes A Circulating tumor cells as a window on metastasis biology in lung cancer. Am J Pathol (2011 ) 178:989–96.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.12.003

  14. 14.

    Armstrong AJ Marengo MS Oltean S Kemeny G Bitting RL Turnbull JD Circulating tumor cells from patients with advanced prostate and breast cancer display both epithelial and mesenchymal markers. Mol Cancer Res (2011 ) 9:997–1007.

    Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-10-0490

  15. 15.

    Yu M Bardia A Wittner BS Stott SL Smas ME Ting DT Circulating breast tumor cells exhibit dynamic changes in epithelial and mesenchymal composition. Science (2013 ) 339:580–4.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1228522

  16. 16.
  17. 17.

    Aceto N Bardia A Miyamoto DT Donaldson MC Wittner BS Spencer JA Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis. Cell (2014 ) 158:1110–22.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.013

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    Thiery JP Sleeman JP. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2006 ) 7:131–42.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm1835

  20. 20.

    Kumar S Das A Sen S. Extracellular matrix density promotes EMT by weakening cell-cell adhesions. Mol Biosyst (2014 ) 10:838–50.

    Not in our library10.1039/c3mb70431a

  21. 21.

    Brabletz S Brabletz T. The ZEB/miR-200 feedback loop – a motor of cellular plasticity in development and cancer? EMBO Rep (2010 ) 11:670–7.

    Not in our library10.1038/embor.2010.117

  22. 22.

    Lu M Jolly MK Onuchic J Ben-Jacob E. Toward decoding the principles of cancer metastasis circuits. Cancer Res (2014 ) 74:4574–87.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-3367

  23. 23.

    Chen L Gibbons DL Goswami S Cortez MA Ahn Y Byers LA Metastasis is regulated via microRNA-200/ZEB1 axis control of tumour cell PD-L1 expression and intratumoral immunosuppression. Nat Commun (2014 ) 5:1–12.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms6241

  24. 24.

    Pecot CV Rupaimoole R Yang D Akbani R Ivan C Lu C Tumour angiogenesis regulation by the miR-200 family. Nat Commun (2013 ) 4:2427.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms3427

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    Park SM Gaur AB Lengyel E Peter ME. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev (2008 ) 22:894–907.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1640608

  27. 27.

    Burk U Schubert J Wellner U Schmalhofer O Vincan E Spaderna S A reciprocal repression between ZEB1 and members of the miR-200 family promotes EMT and invasion in cancer cells. EMBO Rep (2008 ) 9:582–9.

    Not in our library10.1038/embor.2008.74

  28. 28.

    Bracken CP Gregory PA Kolesnikoff N Bert AG Wang J Shannon MF A double-negative feedback loop between ZEB1-SIP1 and the microRNA-200 family regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res (2008 ) 68:7846–54.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1942

  29. 29.

    Zhou JX Huang S. Understanding gene circuits at cell-fate branch points for rational cell reprogramming. Trends Genet (2011 ) 27:55–62.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2010.11.002

  30. 30.

    Macía J Widder S Solé R. Why are cellular switches Boolean? General conditions for multistable genetic circuits. J Theor Biol (2009 ) 261:126–35.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.019

  31. 31.

    Andrecut M Halley JD Winkler DA Huang S. A general model for binary cell fate decision gene circuits with degeneracy: indeterminacy and switch behavior in the absence of cooperativity. PLoS One (2011 ) 6:e19358.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0019358

  32. 32.
  33. 33.

    Cherry JL Adler FR How to make a biological switch. J Theor Biol (2000 ) 203:117–33.

    Not in our library10.1006/jtbi.2000.1068

  34. 34.

    Gardner TS Cantor CR Collins JJ. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature (2000 ) 403:339–42.

    Not in our library10.1038/35002131

  35. 35.

    Huang S Guo YP May G Enver T. Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. Dev Biol (2007 ) 305:695–713.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.02.036

  36. 36.

    Balázsi G Van Oudenaarden A Collins JJ. Cellular decision making and biological noise: from microbes to mammals. Cell (2011 ) 144:910–25.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.030

  37. 37.
  38. 38.

    Graf T Enver T. Forcing cells to change lineages. Nature (2009 ) 462:587–94.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08533

  39. 39.

    Pal M Ghosh S Bose I. Non-genetic heterogeneity, criticality and cell differentiation. Phys Biol (2015 ) 12:016001.

    Not in our library10.1088/1478-3975/12/1/016001

  40. 40.

    Tian X-J Zhang H Xing J. Coupled reversible and irreversible bistable switches underlying TGFβ-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Biophys J (2013 ) 105:1079–89.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2013.07.011

All 230 references

Cited by papers we hold 25

and 5 more

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.