No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
The promotion mechanism of prebiotics for probiotics: A review
Siyong You, Yuchen Ma, Bowen Yan and 4 more
Frontiers in Nutrition · 2022 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
Prebiotics and probiotics play a positive role in promoting human nutrition and health. Prebiotics are compounds that cannot be digested by the host, but can be used and fermented by probiotics, so as to promote the reproduction and metabolism of intestinal probiotics for the health of body. It has been confirmed that probiotics have clinical or health care functions in preventing or controlling intestinal, respiratory, and urogenital infections, allergic reaction, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome and other aspects. However, there are few systematic summaries of these types, mechanisms of action and the promotion relationship between prebiotics and probiotic. Therefore, we summarized the various types of prebiotics and probiotics, their individual action mechanisms, and the mechanism of prebiotics promoting probiotics in the intestinal tract. It is hoped this review can provide new ideas for the application of prebiotics and probiotics in the future.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Since entering the 21st century, the health of intestinal flora has become a topic of concern among many scientists. Compared with the symbiotic flora in other parts of the human body, the number of intestinal flora is larger and more complex. The total number of adult intestinal flora is approximately 3.9 × 1013 in colon, slightly more than the total number of human cells. Intestinal flora helps the host digest nutrients in food and participates in systemically physiological activities of the human body, which are closely related to the human health. According to its effect on the human body, we divide intestinal flora into three functional categories: probiotics, neutral bacteria, and pathogenic bacteria. In healthy individuals, these compete and restrict with each other, maintaining a normal dynamic balance.
The intestinal tract, which has been described as the second brain of the human body, plays an important role in health. The intestinal flora interacts with the human body, helping the body to digest and absorb nutrients from food, metabolize toxic waste produced in the intestine, and produce functional substances necessary for life, such as amino acids, vitamins, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and other substances. If the intestinal flora is disturbed, it will affect human health and even cause diseases such as obesity, diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome and colon cancer, so it is important to maintain its balance. Therefore, in order to keep the intestinal flora in a healthy state, it is necessary to use external forces to regulate the number of probiotics and pathogenic bacteria.
Probiotics are living microorganisms that provide benefits to host health by colonizing the body when given in sufficient amounts. Probiotics can adjust the structure of human intestinal microorganisms and inhibit the colonization of pathogenic bacteria in the intestine. It addition, probiotics show ability to help the body build a healthy protective layer of intestinal mucosa, enhancing the intestinal barrier effect and improving immunity. According to the characteristics of probiotics, we need to understand their mechanism of action on the human body and promote their growth and reproduction.
The growth and reproduction of probiotics cannot be achieved without the promotion of prebiotics. Prebiotics are ingredients, mostly polysaccharides, that cannot be digested and absorbed by the human body, which can contribute to the growth or reproduction of active microorganisms in the host. Prebiotics have the function of improving the regulation of immunity, resisting pathogens, influencing metabolism, increasing mineral absorption, and enhancing health. Prebiotics usually refer to certain polysaccharides, oligosaccharides, microalgae, and natural plants, with a wide range of sources. Emerging prebiotics are mainly found in algae, fruit juice, peels, seeds, traditional Chinese medicine, and microorganism involving polysaccharides, polyphenols, and polypeptide polymers.
Most previous studies have focused on the health benefits of prebiotics and probiotics. However, systematic studies on the types of prebiotics and probiotics, their mechanisms and the relationship between them are lacking. Therefore, this paper provides a comprehensive description of the common types of prebiotics, the functional sources of emerging ones, and their mechanisms of prebiotics in the intestine. In addition, the types, functions, and applications of probiotics are described, and the mechanisms of probiotic effects on the human body are described in detail. Furthermore, this review also focuses on the promotion mechanism between prebiotics and probiotics. It is hoped that this review can help researchers understand the relationship between prebiotics and probiotics and provide ideas for human health, especially the balance of intestinal flora.
The concept of prebiotics
The definition of a prebiotic was first introduced in 1995 as an indigestible component of the body. It is an ingredient that cannot be digested by the human body, which can resist gastric acid and is not decomposed by mammalian enzymes and absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract. Prebiotics are fermented by the intestinal flora and selectively stimulate a certain number of bacteria present in the colon, thereby altering their growth and activity to beneficially affect the host. In 2004, Gibson et al. proposed that prebiotics are ingredients that can be selectively fermented and specifically alter the composition and activity of beneficial host health flora in the intestine, which is termed as “bifidogenic factors”. In 2016, the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics redefined prebiotics as substances that can be selectively used and transformed by the host intestinal flora under the premise that they are beneficial to host health. The new definition of prebiotics includes non-carbohydrates, and the site of action is not limited to the gastrointestinal tract, nor is its type limited to food.
Types of prebiotics
Previous studies have considered prebiotics to be oligosaccharide carbohydrates, of which mainly include xylooligosaccharides (XOS), galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), lactulose and inulin and its derived fructose-oligosaccharides (FOS). However, recent studies have found that prebiotics include not only carbohydrates, but also other non-carbohydrates that meet the prebiotic criteria, such as polyphenols isolated from fruits such as black raspberries and blueberries. With the continuous optimization of the prebiotic preparation process, new prebiotic species continuously are being developed, mainly including polysaccharides, polyphenols and polypeptide polymers, which have broad research prospects.
Galacto-oligosaccharides
GOS, a new functional substance with natural properties, are not easily digested and absorbed by the body. GOS are composed of two to eight sugar units, one of which is a terminal glucose, and the rest are galactose and disaccharides (containing two galactose units). An important feature of GOS is their hybrid structure, as evidenced by the different glycosidic linkages between its glucose and galactose or between the degree of polymerization (DP) and galactose molecules. Figure 1 shows the schematic model of lactose hydrolysis and GOS synthesis from glucose and galactose by enzyme.
Several studies have evaluated the toxicity and genotoxicity of GOS, which have proven that GOS are a very safe food ingredient, and various regions, including the United States, Japan, and the European Union, have granted official safety approval for them. As one of the most common and widely used prebiotics, GOS have many healthy properties, such as regulating the balance of human colon microbiota and promoting the proliferation of Bifidobacterium in the intestine. Currently, GOS are mainly used in formula and infant milk powder. When infants cannot get human milk, formula enriched with GOS or a mixture with FOS can effectively replace human milk and alter infants' intestinal flora. An experiment with 35 healthy full-term infants revealed that Bifidobacterium abundance increased significantly after being fed infant formula supplemented with GOS, while a decrease in microbiota alpha-diversity was apparent GOS (OM55N). In addition, their fecal pH and SCFAs patterns were similar to those of control infants, suggesting that GOS stimulate indigenous Bifidobacterium growth and establish microbiota similar to that of breast-fed babies. That experiment's findings were consistent with those of Fanaro et al., who presented multiple studies of over 400 preterm and term infants, where probiotic mixtures (short-chain GOS and long-chain FOS) effectively stimulated the growth of Bifidobacterium and lactic acid bacteria (LAB), reduced pathogen growth, and made the stool characteristics of the experimental subjects consuming GOS-containing infant formula consistent with those of breast-fed infants.
Inulin-type fructans
In addition to GOS, inulin-type fructans are common carbohydrates, which can meet the criteria for prebiotics. Inulin-type fructans are polymers made from fructose linked to terminal α-linked glucose by β-2,1 bond. The longer chain is inulin, which has a DP of 2–60, and the shorter chain is oligofructose/ FOS, which has a DP of 2–8. Several studies have shown that inulin-type fructans can promote the growth of Bifidobacteria, Anthobacteria and LAB.
Inulin, a water-soluble storage polysaccharide, is a non-digestible carbohydrate (fructan-type). Inulin has been part of the daily diet of humans for centuries and is widely found in ~36,000 plant species, of which chicory root is considered to be the richest source of inulin. Inulin consists of a linear chain of β-2,1-linked d-fructofuranose molecules terminated at the reducing end by a sucrose-type linkage by a glucose residue. The presence of β--D-frutosyl fructose bonds between the fructose unit and the isomeric carbon of inulin makes it difficult for inulin to be absorbed and digested by the human small intestine, but it can be fermented by the intestinal flora of the human large intestine.
Inulin is widely used in food processing as a multi-purpose ingredient with the following main functions: (i) replace fats or carbohydrates to give good flavor to food, but it only provides approximately one-third of the energy and is much less sweet than sucrose; (ii) promote the absorption of minerals (e.g., calcium, magnesium, and iron); (iii) relieve constipation, prevents gastrointestinal diseases, and stimulate the immune system; and (iv) as a prebiotic with bifidogenic effect, effectively stimulate the development and metabolism of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the colon and increase the activity of intestinal microorganisms. In addition, the relative abundance of Anaerostipes, Faecalibacterium and Lactobacillus increased and that of Bacteroides decreased after inulin supplementation.
Another well-known inulin-type fructan, FOS, are found in a variety of natural plants, such as bananas, wheat, garlic and onions. They are low-calorie, non-digestible carbohydrates whose DP is <10 and are also a common prebiotic in the food industry. FOS have a variety of beneficial physiological effects, such as being low in carcinogenicity, improving mineral absorption in the intestine, and lowering serum cholesterol levels, triacylglycerols, and phospholipids. Among them, the prebiotic activity of FOS in gastrointestinal digestion is the focus of our focus. FOS improve the body's intestinal flora, relieve constipation, reduce the risk of heart disease and certain cancers, improves lipids in hyperlipidemia, inhibit the production of intestinal putrefactive substances, and allow the body's digestive system to function more healthily.
Emerging prebiotics
With the advancement of technology, the preparation methods of prebiotics have been optimized. In addition, various new prebiotic species (mainly including polysaccharides, polyphenols, and polypeptide polymers) have been developed. Emerging prebiotics are found mainly in algae, fruit juices, fruits and their waste, herbal medicines, and microorganisms from a wide range of sources. Although the knowledge of these prebiotics is not as good as that of FOS and GOS, their potential deserves to be studied in depth and has a promising future. In order to overview the prepared emerging prebiotic in recent years, the functions of polysaccharides, polyphenols and peptide polymers were listed in Table 1.
Mechanism of action of prebiotics
In general, in the human intestine, the lack of enzymes that hydrolyze the polymer bonds of prebiotics allows them to remain in the gastrointestinal tract to resist digestion in the small intestine. The human body then transports these prebiotics intact to the large intestine, where they are degraded by the intestinal flora and selectively fermented to produce certain secondary metabolites, which are absorbed by the intestinal epithelium or transported to the liver through the portal vein and can have beneficial effects on host physiological processes, exerting effects such as regulating immunity, resisting pathogens, improving intestinal barrier function, increasing mineral absorption, and lowering blood lipid levels. The most abundant SCFAs in the intestine are metabolized by beneficial bacteria, including acetate, butyrate and propionate, which are beneficial to maintaining intestinal and systemic health. Moreover, a specific advantage of prebiotics is referred to their promotion for the growth of target microorganisms. After consumption of specific prebiotics (e.g., inulin, FOS, and GOS), they can promote the growth of beneficial flora to compete with other species by protecting or promoting the production of beneficial fermentation products. The possible mechanisms by which prebiotics promote health benefits in humans are shown in Figure 2. In addition, prebiotics have a protective effect not only on the gastrointestinal system but also on other parts of the body, such as the central nervous, immune, and cardiovascular systems (Figure 3).
Overview of different probiotics
The concept of traditional probiotics was originally born based on the observations of Elie Metchnikoff in 1907, who found that the health and increased longevity of older Bulgarians was linked to their daily intake of fermented dairy products rich in LAB, such as yogurt. Metchnikoff noted that bacteria may have a beneficial effect on the natural gut microbiota. Since then, probiotics have been symbolized as bacteria that benefit the health of the host. Over time, the definition of probiotics has been largely modified (Figure 4).
According to the definitions of probiotics by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization, probiotics are live strains of microorganisms that have been rigorously screened and, when properly ingested, can exert beneficial effects on the health of those who consume them. Probiotics can perform vastly positive functions on the human body, such as regulating human intestinal health, maintaining the balance of microflora, regulating human immune function, helping the body to better digest and absorb food residues, improving blood lipid and blood sugar metabolism, and treating and alleviating lactose intolerance, which has a positive impact on human health. To achieve good health benefits, probiotics must be able to grow in the food product and survive in sufficient numbers until they reach their final destination, the intestine. Therefore, it is clear that the factor that must be considered in the selection of probiotics is their adhesion to the intestinal mucosa and intestinal epithelial cells.
Probiotics exert beneficial effects on the body through four main mechanisms: prevention of potential pathogens and inhibition of their growth, improvement of the barrier function of the gut, immunomodulation of the body, the production of neurotransmitters can modulate the host. Oelschlaeger found that probiotics can directly affect or act on other microbial products, host products, or food ingredients by modulating the host's immune system. However, a point of concern is that the health improvement of probiotics is dependent on the probiotic flora added, and what function the probiotic performs depends on its metabolic characteristics and surface molecules or secreted components of the cells of these microorganisms. Furthermore, whole composition, such as DNA and peptidoglycan, may play a very important role in the efficacy of probiotics. It should be mentioned there is no single strain can provide all the above-mentioned probiotic properties of probiotics. According to the action mechanisms of probiotics in Figure 5, it can be known that probiotics can provide a variety of means to enhance host immunity, which in turn directly affects immune cells and other host cells. In addition, the antimicrobial component substances and cross-feeds can be produced by probiotics, which is generally produced from the combination of multiple action of microorganisms.
Lactobacillus
Probiotics have a wide distribution range and a variety of species, which can be broadly classified into three major groups: Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria and others. At present, most studies on probiotic species are aimed at the LAB group, which is the most representative probiotic in the LAB group. Lactobacillus is an important probiotic in the study of human intestinal microorganisms, which is closely related to human health; it not only synthesizes essential vitamins and amino acids and promotes mineral absorption, but importantly, it can achieve the effect of improving intestinal microecology by inhibiting the growth of harmful microorganisms. In addition, SCFAs, an important metabolite of Lactobacillus, help maintain the normal physiological function of the colon and the morphology of the colonic epithelium, as well as promote the growth and reproduction of Lactobacillus, thus reducing the number of Escherichia coli in the intestine.
Lactobacillus has a significant positive effect on host growth, especially by improving body weight and size. For example, Liu et al. found that Lactobacillus plantarum (which is termed as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum according to the updated microbial taxonomy) ZJUFT17 (T17), isolated from traditional Chinese sour dough, could act as a potential probiotic with anti-obesity or weight loss properties and could improve systemic inflammation and insulin resistance mediated by intestinal microbiota. Specifically, the weight gain, energy intake and serum lipids of high-fat diet induced mice could be inhibited when 24 × 108 cfu of T17 was administered for mice for 10 weeks. Li et al. investigated the use of soymilk fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum HFY01 for weight reduction and lipid-lowering in mice with HFD-induced obesity, and the results were similar. Lactobacillus plantarum HFY01 fermented soymilk reduced body fat percentage and liver index in obese mice and strongly inhibited high-fat diet-induced obesity, showing good utilization potential.
Lactobacillus influences microbial interventions to maintain or improve microbial balance in the host environment and to inhibit pathogen invasion. Synergistic interactions between LAB and endogenous commensal flora are an important factor in restoring microbial endostasis. For example, LAB in sour dough can be used in combination with plant- and/or animal-based ingredients. Due to the different mechanisms of action and ideal symbiotic activities, the functional characteristics of the whole combination can be enhanced, and it has good flavor and nutritional value. In addition to the synergistic effect with commensal flora, LAB produce compounds with antimicrobial effects in the defense against pathogens by enhancing the epithelial barrier function of the intestine.
Bifdobacterium
Bifidobacterium is a genus of Gram-positive specialized anaerobic bacteria that is often bifurcated at the end, which is the origin of its name. It is a physiological bacterium that exists in the human body and is a very important group of probiotics for humans. Bifidobacterium can adapt to the anaerobic intestinal life, reproduce and metabolize in the middle and end of the small intestine and large intestine, and secrete bifidogenic factors with probiotic effects to regulate intestinal health. Currently, Bifidobacterium includes 32 species and 9 subspecies, 14 of which have been isolated from humans.
The physiological functions of Bifidobacterium are mainly as follows: (i) Similar to other LAB, Bifidobacterium can restrain the growth of pathogenic bacteria, so as to maintain the balance of normal intestinal bacterial flora and inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokines. Related experiments have also demonstrated that Bifidobacterium can protect against intestinal barrier dysfunction both in vitro and in vivo. This protective effect is associated with inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and vimentin release and improvement of intestinal tight junction integrity. (ii) Bifidobacterium bifidum synthesizes vitamins and amino acids in the intestine and increases calcium bioavailability, and it is thought to improve bone health. (iii) Bifidobacterium bifidum has anti-tumor effects. Shimizu et al. successfully produced a strain of Bifidobacterium longum that secretes C-CPE-PE23 and can selectively localize and proliferate in tumors. The isolated Bifidobacteria were specifically distributed in the tumors of mice with breast cancer and significantly inhibited tumor growth without serious side effects such as weight loss or liver and kidney damage, and the experimental results suggest that Bifidobacteria can be special carriers of anti-cancer proteins against malignant tumors.
Other bacteria species
In addition to Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, Gram-positive parthenococci such as Enterococcus are frequently used in the food industry today. The ability of Enterococcus strains to survive, compete and attach to host cells in the intestine is a key feature as a probiotic. In addition, Enterococcus is highly resistant to a wide range of pH and temperature; this is attributed to its strong bacteriocin production capacity, which can be used as a natural antimicrobial agent in the food industry.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a well-known non-pathogenic and selective probiotic that is now used in the commercial production of probiotic foods. Saccharomyces boulardii, for example, has been extensively studied for its probiotic action and is commonly used to treat digestive disorders such as diarrhea symptoms, especially when used as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy. Furthermore, when passing through the digestive tract, Saccharomyces boulardii has a higher survival capacity compared to other probiotics, helping to maintain the balance of the normal microflora of the intestinal tract. It also has immunomodulatory effects, acting to fine-tune immunological pathways during pathogenic infections or chronic diseases.
In addition to the enterococci and yeasts mentioned above, other categories of probiotics that are more common are Bacillus species, Streptococcus species, and E. coli. Based on recently published work, the roles and applications of some common probiotics were summarized in Table 2.
Enhancement of barrier function for intestinal mucosa
As the largest immune organ in the body, intestine is very important to human body. The intestinal barrier is a heterogeneous body composed of extracellular components, including the mucus layer, the cellular layer and the lamina propria of the intestinal epithelium. Figure 6 presents relevant details of the intestinal barrier and the main cellular players.
Both mucus layer and intestinal epithelium possess the own specific cell types, which can be a physical barrier to intestinal microorganisms. For example, enterocytes can absorb the molecules from the intestinal lumen. Paneth cells possess the ability to synthesize and secrete antimicrobial peptides during contact with intestinal bacteria. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells can secrete mucus. Intestinal endocrine cells are the constituent part of intestinal epithelium. The main roles of the intestinal epithelial mucus layer are to create a protective barrier against the hostile luminal environment, to facilitate the passage of food, and to avoid the adhesion of pathogens into the lamina propria.
Probiotics will interact with intestinal bacteria after entering the intestine; the first to play the role of physical barrier is the intestinal mucosa, which keeps the intestine at a safe distance from toxic substances in the intestinal lumen. Probiotics will react with bacteria after entering the intestine to enhance its chemical barrier, mechanical barrier, biological barrier and immune barrier. Reaching the intestine, probiotics will interact with intestinal cells, with the aim of restoring intestinal permeability, stimulating mucus production, promoting mucosal regeneration, and maintaining the mucosal barrier's integrity and the intestinal mechanical barrier's normal function. For example, some studies have found that antibiotics disrupt normal intestinal microbes and cause disruption of the intestinal barrier. However, the water-soluble polysaccharide from Fagopyrum esculentum Moench bee pollen can alleviate antibiotic-induced microbiota dysbiosis and improve intestinal barrier integrity by increasing intestinal sIgA secretion and suppressing inflammation.
Enhancement of the immune response of the system
Certain probiotics in the gut can influence the function of various immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages, T cells, B cells and natural killer (NK) cells in the body in a direct or indirect way, thus acting as immune regulators and controlling inflammation; some of these probiotics are of the immunostimulatory type. These probiotics enhance non-specific cellular immune responses characterized by fighting against cancer cells, inducing IL-12 production, thus activating NK cells and developing Th1 cells, and releasing various cytokines in a strain-specific and dose-dependent manner; they also fight against allergies through the balance between Th1 and Th2. To improve the intestinal mucosal immune system, for example, yogurt can be used to deliver the required probiotics to increase the number of IgA+ cells and cytokine-producing cells in the intestinal effector sites and enhance the immune response of the system. Short-term supplementation with probiotics can also enhance the body's cellular immune function. One study found that probiotics increased the body's polymorphonuclear phagocytosis capacity and tumor-killing activity of NK cells and improved cellular immune function in older people after supplementation with appropriate amounts of probiotics.
Generally, the probiotics can directly or indirectly stimulate immune cells in the gut to enhance its function. Some probiotics (i.e., immunomodulatory probiotics) can also regulate enzyme activity by altering microbial metabolism. If exposed to any foreign antigen, the host intestinal mucosal immune system initiates an immune response, partly through an adaptive immune response and partly by inducing inflammation to maintain homeostasis in the body. Immunomodulatory probiotics are characterized by the production of IL-10 and Treg cells, leading to a reduction in symptoms such as allergy and inflammation. It has been found that probiotics increase intestinal barrier function by stimulating B cells and influencing cytokine production, thereby initiating an adaptive response in the host body, and that short-term supplementation with probiotics can also enhance the body's cellular immune function. In the presence of probiotics, monocytes act synergistically with NK cells to reduce and inhibit inflammatory cytokine release by secreting IL-10 to induce regulatory differentiation of stem cells and resistance to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Figure 7 shows an immunomodulatory mechanism involving two different classes of probiotics, namely, immunostimulatory and immunomodulatory.
Prevention of pathogenic bacteria adsorption and colonization
Probiotics regulate the intervention of intestinal microorganisms through colonization by modulating microorganism metabolism and improving human health. Probiotics prevent gastrointestinal diseases by competing for nutrients or producing antimicrobial factors to form colonization resistance to reduce infection by intestinal pathogenic microorganisms. The health of rabbits can be improved by using the autogenous strain Enterococcus faecalis EF2019 (CCM7420), which has a good ability to colonize the intestinal tract and produces the antimicrobial enterococin Ent7420, which effectively reduces coagulase-positive staphylococci, coliforms and clostridia. In addition to the gut, probiotics have the ability to colonize the epithelial surface and produce antimicrobial metabolites capable of controlling and maintaining the microbiota of the vagina. For example, Lactobacillus acidophilus KS400 produces bacteriocins with antimicrobial activity against relevant urogenital pathogens.
Because the activity of probiotics depends on the conditions of the host gastrointestinal tract and changes in the intestinal flora, the colonization and persistence of probiotics are important. Probiotic strains secrete secondary metabolites such as SCFAs and peptides with antimicrobial activity, which may interact directly with the host or pathogen to prevent proliferation of pathogens and improve the efficacy of probiotics. Probiotics can adsorb to mucus and epithelial cells to create a competitive advantage over pathogenic bacteria and bind to the host to produce stronger interactions and stimulate the host's immune response.
Thus, probiotics can be ingested as exogenous bacteria, colonize the human intestine, change the composition of intestinal flora, and then compete with pathogenic bacteria for nutrients, further excluding pathogenic bacteria and improving the immunity of the body.
Mechanism of action between probiotics and gut-brain axis
The importance of the gut-brain axis in maintaining homeostasis in the body has long been appreciated, and it is considered a central nervous system pathway that regulates bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain at the neuronal, endocrine, and immune levels. As one of the important regulators of the gut-brain axis, microbiota have been of great interest in understanding of the importance of the gut-brain axis. Current evidence suggests that the gut microbiota and the brain communicate with each other through various pathways, including the immune system, tryptophan metabolism, the vagus and enteric nervous systems, and other mechanisms that may be involved in gut microbial signaling to the brain involving microbial metabolites such as SCFAs, branched-chain amino acids and peptidoglycans. In turn, the brain can change the composition and behavior of microorganisms through the autonomic nervous system.
Many hormones and neurotransmitters are made in the gut, such as SCFAs, secondary products from carbohydrate fermentation, dopamine and serotonin, which can directly influence brain function and behavior. The gut microbiota broadly and profoundly affects the gut-brain relationship, including mental status, mood regulation, neuromuscular function, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis regulation, and the emotional and cognitive centers of the brain are affected either directly or indirectly. Figure 8 shows the schematic diagram of microbiota gut-brain axis bidirectional signal pathway.
The relationship between intestinal flora and depression has been a hot topic of research in recent years. The gut microbiota has been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of depression, and although the relevant pathogenesis is unclear, it may be associated with modulation of monoamine neurotransmitter release and efficacy, altered activity and function of the HPA axis, and changes in the abundance of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Therefore, attempts to target the microbiota-gut-brain axis to treat depression are increasing. Studies have found that probiotics promote the production of SCFAs such as butyric acid, which is very important for the integrity of the intestinal barrier, it affects the central nervous system by changing the expression of BDNF and also has a positive impact on reducing the incidence rate of depression. To determine the effect of probiotic intake on depressive symptoms and metabolic status in major depressive disorder patients, Akkasheh et al. conducted an experiment on 40 major depressive disorder patients (i.e., ingesting probiotic supplements composed of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum). They found that the administration of probiotic showed positive effect to decrease in the Beck Depression Inventory index and a significant decrease in insulin levels. This result is consistent with the experimental results of Kazemi et al., where, among 110 patients who were randomly treated with probiotics for 8 weeks, Beck Depression Inventory scores decreased significantly.
New research points to a link between autism and imbalance in the gut microbiota. Srikantha and Mohajeri tested metabolites in the urine of children with autism and found that patients had abnormal levels of SCFAs, LPS, and indoles, which are likely to be caused by an incomplete gut barrier. Therefore, probiotics can be used to regulate the gut flora and re-establish gut homeostasis. The possible pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease is like that of autism, where increased intestinal barrier permeability and immune cell activation impairs blood-brain barrier function, loses neurons, promotes neuroinflammation, and causes nerve damage, leading to disease onset. The use of probiotics as a supplement can regulate the balance of intestinal flora, which introduces a research direction for the treatment and prevention of Alzheimer's disease.
Promoting the growth and multiplication of probiotics
Previous studies have found that prebiotics can promote the growth of probiotics in the human gut and improve intestinal microbial diversity. Probiotics account for a certain proportion of the normal intestinal flora in the intestine; they can inhibit the growth of harmful bacteria, regulate the human immune mechanism, and are closely related to human health. Probiotics cannot grow and metabolize without a carbon source (mainly carbohydrates). Prebiotics are not decomposed by human digestive juices, and indigestible prebiotics can be converted into carbon sources required by probiotics in the intestine, promoting the proliferation of good bacteria and regulating the composition of probiotics.
There are many studies on prebiotics promoting the growth and reproduction of probiotics, most of which focus on polysaccharide-based prebiotics. For example, Vázquez-Rodríguez et al. found that the polysaccharide fraction isolated from brown seaweed Silvetia compressa could proliferate Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus to increase the synthesis of total SCFAs with effects similar to inulin. Shang et al. investigated Enteromorpha clathrata polysaccharide and found that Enteromorpha clathrata polysaccharide greatly altered the structure of the intestinal microbiota and significantly promoted the growth of probiotics in C57BL/6J mice. Moreover, Enteromorpha clathrata polysaccharide affected the microbiota differently in females and males, with Enteromorpha clathrata polysaccharide causing an increase in the number of Lactobacillus bacteria in male mice and Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia muciniphila (the next generation of probiotics) in females. The positive effect of sulfated polysaccharides isolated from sea cucumber Stichopus japonicus (SCSPsj) on rodent health was attributed to the significant modulation of the gut microbial community by SCSPsj due to the regulation of gut microorganisms. Although not directly proliferating LAB, SCSPsj significantly promoted biofilm formation and mucus binding, contributing to their enrichment in vivo and indirectly increasing their abundance.
In addition to polysaccharide prebiotics, polyphenolic compounds can selectively promote the growth of probiotics. The existed phenolic compounds (e.g., catechin, gallic acid, vanillic acid, and protocatechuic acid) in mangos can inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria and have a good effect on the growth and reproduction of probiotics. Not only limited to the intestinal tract, Sphallerocarpus gracilis polysaccharides both enhance the acidifying activity of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (which is termed as Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus according to the updated microbial taxonomy) during milk fermentation and promote the growth of these probiotics. Overall, the above findings are a good indication that prebiotics can be utilized by certain probiotics, thus increasing flora abundance.
Promoting the metabolism of probiotics
SCFAs are the metabolism products of fermentation of carbohydrates and proteins by intestinal bacteria from endogenous or dietary sources. They consist of saturated fatty acids with chains of 2–6 carbons. Probiotics and prebiotics are the most important factors in the formation of SCFAs. In the intestine, prebiotics produce beneficial metabolites in the presence of probiotics, predominantly SCFAs, which influence the intestinal environment and lower intestinal pH.
SCFAs are mostly produced by anaerobic bacterial fermentation of undigested and unabsorbed carbohydrates in the colon, with SCFAs-producing probiotics mainly including Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Clostridium Butyricum. Prebiotics have an important effect on SCFAs production by probiotics. One study showed that the physical form of the prebiotic substrate affected fermentation rate and SCFAs production. Higher crystallinity bacterial cellulose had lower fermentation rates than less crystalline soluble polysaccharides, and cellulose complex fermentation produced a different SCFAs profile compared to soluble polysaccharides, with significantly higher butyric acid production and lower propionic acid production than that of rapidly fermentable substrates.
The concentration of prebiotics is also an important factor affecting the amount SCFAs produced by probiotics. Fehlbaum et al. found that five prebiotics of varied concentrations (i.e., inulin, α-GOS, β-GOS, xylo-oligosaccharides and β-glucan) to explore their regulatory effects on intestinal microorganisms. The experimental results showed that β-glucan had the most significant effect on microbial composition and metabolism—as it promoted the growth and reproduction of Prevotella and Roseburia—resulting in a significant increase in the production of propionic acid. In addition, the proportion of butyrate increased with the increase of β-glucan and inulin concentrations. As an important energy source for intestinal epithelial cells, butyrate has beneficial properties such as anti-colon cancer and anti-inflammation effects. Taking tea dietary fiber as an example, it was found that with the increase of tea dietary fiber concentration, the pH value in the fermentation broth could be significantly reduced, where 3% dietary fiber powder showed the most significant effect. In addition, Fei et al. found that prebiotics could be fermented into the SCFAs, which showed the benefits to promote the niche opportunity of probiotics by strengthening tight junctions, promoting colon cell proliferation and mucus production, and lowering intestinal pH. The produced SCFAs can also be regarded as the nutrients to enhance the function of probiotics. In addition, prebiotics and pathogens can competitively bind to the receptors on epithelial cells, facilitating the probiotics to produce antimicrobial peptides to show the antibacterial effect. The detailed mechanisms of prebiotics for enhancing the functions of probiotics were shown in Figure 9A.
In general, prebiotics promote the production of SCFAs (mainly butyric acid, propionic acid, and acetic acid) by probiotics, and the increase in SCFAs also leads to a decrease in the pH of the intestine and is beneficial to human health. In the human intestine, a suitable pH value is conducive to maintaining the adhesion ability of probiotics and promoting their growth and colonization, and a lower intestinal pH value can effectively inhibit the reproduction of harmful bacteria and promote the reproduction of probiotics.
Promoting the resistance of probiotics to reactive oxygen species and bile salts/acids
It is well known that the existing bacteria and probiotics in the intestine survive under the oxidizing environment with oxygen and reactive oxygen species (ROS), which is produced from the steps of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and the electron transport system (ETS) during the process of oxidative phosphorylation of oxygen in mitochondria. The moderate amount of ROS shows benefits to keep the health of the human body. While, the excessive amount of ROS in the intestine can induce an adverse effect on the diversity and survival of intestinal probiotics by reacting with DNA, proteins, and lipids in their cell membranes.
It has been reported that the prebiotics of fructans, plant polyphenols, inulin, and yellow lupin polysaccharides could scavenge the free ROS in the gastrointestinal tract, which showed the protective effect for probiotics. The capability of prebiotics to scavenge ROS is due to the produced butyrate acid in SCFAs can consume the oxygen during the metabolism process in the gut. As shown in Figure 9B, the decreased oxygen concentration further can adjust the habitability of gut environment for oxygen-sensitive probiotics.
Generally, bile shows the ability to promote the digestion and absorption of lipids in the body. Most probiotics in the intestine are extremely sensitive to bile salts/acids, which can inhibit the growth and function of probiotics by causing oxidative stress, dissolving bacterial membranes and damaging DNA. It is reported that bile salts/acids can be degraded by the prebiotics of GOS, resistant starch (RS), and inulin-type fructans via binding up bile acids, reducing their reabsorption and increasing their turnover rate in the intestines. For the probiotics, they can be incorporated into microcapsules with the wall materials of used prebiotics, which can avoid exposure of probiotics in the gastric fluids. In addition, the produced butyrate by prebiotics shows an ability to reduce the toxicity of bile salt by reversing the hyper proliferation of the colonic surface induced by deoxycholate. The potential protective functions of prebiotics by maintaining the viability of probiotics during gastrointestinal transit was shown in Figure 9C.
Utilization of prebiotics by probiotics is related to the degree of polymerization of the former
The DP of prebiotics is closely related to probiotic activity. In general, the lower the prebiotic DP, the stronger the prebiotic effect, and the easier it is to be used by probiotics, the possible reason being that prebiotics of lower molecular weight are thought to have active groups that are more exposed. To investigate the effects of fibers with different degrees of polymerization on human intestinal bacteria, Chen et al. investigated the pH, air pressure, and SCFAs content of fecal fermentation with three fiber substrates of different DPs (i.e., carboxymethylcellulose, β-glucans, and GOS). The results showed that operational taxonomic units in Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, and Lactobacillus were then negatively correlated with DP, indicating that lower values of fiber DP produced greater probiotic effects.
As the most common prebiotic, the polymerization degree of inulin has also been widely studied. The prebiotic effect of inulin mainly depends on its DP, which determines its degradation site, hydrolysis rate and fermentation products. Li et al. investigated the effect of inulin with different DP on the intestinal microbiota of c57bl/6 J mice fed a HFD. The experiment found that short-chain inulin preferentially stimulated Bifidobacterium, which showed that Bifidobacterium had the ability to effectively use oligosaccharides. Besides, inulin may inhibit the secretion of endotoxin by increasing the proportion of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, which is conducive to anti-inflammatory activity. Interestingly, long-chain inulin preferentially stimulates the growth of Bacteroides, which has a series of enzymes that can degrade complex polysaccharides into oligosaccharides and monosaccharides. This finding also shows that long-chain inulin is more dependent on bacteria (such as Bacteroides) that can process complex polysaccharides than short-chain inulin, as inulin with a high DP must be hydrolyzed to monosaccharides before being used by bacteria. Zhu et al. proved that in terms of stimulating probiotics, inulin intervention measures with low DPs were more effective than those with high DPs. Specifically, the increase of Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria and Myxomycetes in the FOS group was higher than that in the inulin group; because the DP value of inulin was higher than that of FOS, it was easier to hydrolyze into monosaccharides and be digested and utilized by probiotics, which also showed that compared with inulin with a high DP, inulin with a low DP ferment faster in the intestinal microbiota in vitro. In addition, this study also showed that the dosage of prebiotics affected the increase in probiotics. At high doses, the increase in probiotics' number was more excellent.
From the above research, it can be concluded that inulin with a low DP has a more obvious impact on the structure of intestinal flora than that with a high DP. The reason may be related to the water solubility of inulin. Generally, the water solubility of oligomeric inulin is higher than that of high-aggregation inulin. Short-chain inulin is easier to dissolve in water than long-chain inulin, which is conducive to the rapid utilization of probiotics.
As the protective agent in probiotic viable preparations
Probiotics have a variety of functions and can be used as supplements for human or animals. They are widely used in food, drugs, cosmetics, health products, feed and other fields. In order to increase the longevity of probiotics, it is best to dry them. In the preparation of probiotics, they are usually dried into powder by freeze-drying or spray drying. However, adverse environmental conditions, such as acid, heat, pressure, and oxygen, can also cause a significant decline in the cell viability of probiotics.
Freeze-drying can protect the probiotic from external invasion during storage, maintain the properties and bacteria number of probiotic powders, and give better play to the probiotic effect. This method has the advantages of convenient transportation, maintaining bacteria activity, and long-term storage. However, due to the influence of various factors in the freeze-drying process, the bacteria may die. Therefore, a protective agent can be used to change the environment of probiotics during freeze-drying, reduce the damage to cells, and maintain the original physiological and biochemical characteristics and biological activities of microorganisms as much as possible.
A prebiotic is one of the commonly used protective agents. Savedboworn et al. studied protein-trehalose as a protective agent and found that it has a significant impact on the survival of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum TISTR 2075 grown in the extract of Plai-Ngahm-Prachinburi rice and improved the survival rate of the strain after freeze-drying (98.13%). Compared with other protective agents, even under long-term storage, the protein-trehalose protective agent maintained a high number of living cells and the lowest cell death rate. Shu et al. optimized the compound cryoprotectant containing lactose (21.24%), trehalose (22.00%), and sodium glutamate (4.00%). The optimized protective agent exhibited an S. boulardii survival rate as high as 64.22%, and a maximum number of living cells of 9.5 × 109 cfu/g, which proved that the protective agent prepared from prebiotics had a good protective effect on probiotics during freeze-drying.
Another study evaluated the potential of spent brewer's yeast β-glucan (YβG) as a protective agent for probiotic Lactobacillus cultures and compared it to two common prebiotic protectors, FOS and oligofructose. The experimental results showed that β-glucan and FOS protected Lactobacilli similarly during the first 90 days of refrigeration (4°C). However, after 90 days, FOS provided higher protection and resulted in lower cell membrane damage. In contrast, for Lactobacillus plantarum 201, YβG was more effective as a protective agent. It is worth noting that for different probiotic species, the effect of different prebiotics as protectants varied, indicating that the effect of cryoprotectants varied with the strains tested.
Compared with freeze-drying, spray-drying takes less time, consumes less energy, costs less, and is more suitable for industrial production. The process of spray drying cannot avoid of drying and dehydrating at high temperatures, which will destroy the structure of proteins and nucleic acids, and disrupt the connection between monomer units, largely affecting the viability of probiotics. Therefore, protective agents play a crucial role in protecting probiotics from adverse conditions and in storing them for long periods after drying.
For example, Verruck et al. investigated how to improve the survival of Bifidobacterium BB-12 and found that using goat milk (200 g L−1) and inulin (100 g L−1) as carriers, the survival rate of Bifidobacterium is higher than that without or with FOS, and the spray dried powder produced has the lowest water activity and the best powder stability. Similar results were obtained by Dantas et al., whose experimental results illustrated that the use of inulin as a protective agent was more effective than that of no using or use of FOS, with an encapsulation rate of 88.01% and the highest survival rate of Bifidobacteria during 120 days of storage. Both of these studies illustrate the advantages and potential of prebiotics as a protective agent in the preparation of live probiotic formulations, which can effectively improve the survival of the target strains and maintain good viability during storage.
Summary and prospective
In the current study, prebiotics and probiotics have shown excellent ability to regulate human health, especially the balance of intestinal microorganisms. When they are applied in health food, clinical and other fields, they can show excellent health effects of preventing some diseases, regulating human health, secreting or synthesizing beneficial substances such as antibiotics and SCFAs, and increasing the number of beneficial bacteria. However, further research should be carried out. First, the current mechanism of prebiotic selective promotion of probiotics remains to be explored, especially whether the concentration, preparation method and glycosidic bond connection form of prebiotics have an impact on the utilization efficiency of probiotics, which would aid in selecting the appropriate prebiotics to promote probiotics in practical applications. Second, the mechanism of prebiotics entering the intestinal flora needs to be further revealed. Although many studies have proved the promoting effect of prebiotics on the intestinal flora, the experimental methods and theoretical mechanism still need further improvement. Third, the influence and mechanism of probiotics on the gut-brain axis need to be further explored, which is also an important direction of future development.
Author contributions
SY and YM conducted the literature search and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. BY and WP draft the figures in the manuscript. QW, CD, and CH revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was sponsored by the Jiangsu Qing Lan Project and the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST for CH. In addition, the authors thank the Fuzhou Science and Technology Project (AFZ2021K010003), the Fujian Key Laboratory of Inspection and Quarantine Technology fund (FJKF2021-01), the Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Coarse Cereal Processing of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu University (No. 2022CC010) and the Cooperation Project with ChenXing (No. R-2022-H-002MF) to support this work.
Conflict of interest
Author QW was employed by Nutrilite Health Institute. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References 179
- 1.
Sender R Fuchs S Milo R. Are we really vastly outnumbered? Revisiting the ratio of bacterial to host cells in humans. Cell. (2016 ) 164:337–40.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.013
- 2.
Jones JL Foxx-Orenstein AE. The role of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. (2007 ) 52:607–11.
Not in our library10.1007/s10620-006-9225-y
- 3.
Dai L Gu Y Xu J Guo J Jiang K Zhou X. Toward green production of xylooligosaccharides and glucose from sorghum straw biowaste by sequential acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis. Ind Crops Prod. (2022 ) 179:114662.
Not in our library10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114662
- 4.
Lian Z Zhang Q Xu Y Zhou X Jiang K. Biorefinery cascade processing for converting corncob to xylooligosaccharides and glucose by maleic acid pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. (2022 ).
Not in our library10.1007/s12010-022-03985-7
- 5.
Yan B Huang C Lai C Ling Z Yong Q. Production of prebiotic xylooligosaccharides from industrial-derived xylan residue by organic acid treatment. Carbohydr Polym. (2022 ) 292:119641.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119641
- 6.
Gao X Jia R Xie L Kuang L Feng L Wan C. A study of the correlation between obesity and intestinal flora in school-age children. Sci Rep. (2018 ) 8:1–8.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-32730-6
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
Johansson MA Björkander S Mata Forsberg M Qazi KR Salvany Celades M Bittmann J. Probiotic lactobacilli modulate Staphylococcus aureus-induced activation of conventional and unconventional T cells and NK cells. Front Immunol. (2016 ) 7:273.
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2016.00273
- 10.
Li X Zhang Q Wang W Yang ST. A novel inulin-mediated ethanol precipitation method for separating endo-inulinase from inulinases for inulooligosaccharides production from inulin. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. (2021 ) 9:679720.
Not in our library10.3389/fbioe.2021.679720
- 11.
Peredo-Lovillo A Romero-Luna HE Jiménez-Fernández M. Health promoting microbial metabolites produced by gut microbiota after prebiotics metabolism. Food Res Int. (2020 ) 136:109473.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109473
- 12.
Liu RT Walsh RF Sheehan AE. Prebiotics and probiotics for depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2019 ) 102:13–23.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.023
- 13.
Quigley EM. Prebiotics and probiotics in digestive health. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2019 ) 17:333–44.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.028
- 14.
Gibson GR Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr. (1995 ) 125:1401–12.
Not in our library10.1093/jn/125.6.1401
- 15.
Gibson GR Probert HM Van Loo J Rastall RA Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutr Res Rev. (2004 ) 17:259–75.
Not in our library10.1079/nrr200479
- 16.
Gibson GR Hutkins R Sanders ME Prescott SL Reimer RA Salminen SJ. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2017 ) 14:491–502.
Not in our library10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75
- 17.
Yin X Cai T Liu C Ma Y Hu J Jiang J. A novel solvothermal biorefinery for production of lignocellulosic xylooligosaccharides, fermentable sugars and lignin nano-particles in biphasic system. Carbohydr Polym. (2022 ) 295:119901.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119901
- 18.
- 19.
Ashwini A Ramya HN Ramkumar C Reddy KR Kulkarni RV Abinaya V. Reactive mechanism and the applications of bioactive prebiotics for human health. J Microbiol Methods. (2019 ) 159:128–37.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mimet.2019.02.019
- 20.
Khangwal I Shukla P. Potential prebiotics and their transmission mechanisms: Recent approaches. J Food Drug Anal. (2019 ) 27:649–56.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jfda.2019.02.003
- 21.
Gu J Thomas-Ahner JM Riedl KM Bailey MT Vodovotz Y Schwartz SJ. Dietary black raspberries impact the colonic microbiome and phytochemical metabolites in mice. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2019 ) 63:1800636.
Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.201800636
- 22.
Jiao X Wang Y Lin Y Lang Y Li E Zhang X. Blueberry polyphenols extract as a potential prebiotic with anti-obesity effects on C57BL/6 J mice by modulating the gut microbiota. J Nutr Biochem. (2019 ) 64:88–100.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.07.008
- 23.
Delgado-Fernandez P de Las Rivas B Munoz R Jimeno ML Doyaguez EG Corzo N. Biosynthesis of nondigestible galactose-containing hetero-oligosaccharides by lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 MelA α-Galactosidase. J Agric Food Chem. (2021 ) 69:955–65.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.0c06417
- 24.
Torres D Gonçalves MP Teixeira JA. Galacto-oligosaccharides: production, properties, applications, and significance as prebiotics. Compreh Rev Food Sci Food Safety. (2010 ) 9:438–54.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00119.x
- 25.
Baek Y Ahn Y Shin J Suh HJ Jo K. Evaluation of safety through acute and subacute tests of galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS). Prevent Nutr Food Sci. (2021 ) 26:315.
Not in our library10.3746/pnf.2021.26.3.315
- 26.
Kobayash T Ishida S Kaneko K Onoue M. A 6-week oral gavage toxicity study of a novel galacto-oligosaccharide in juvenile rats. Hum Exp Toxicol. (2014 ) 33:722–28.
Not in our library10.1177/0960327113506239
- 27.
Kobayashi T Yasutake N Uchida K Ohyama W Kaneko K Onoue M. Safety of a novel galacto-oligosaccharide: genotoxicity and repeated oral dose studies. Hum Exp Toxicol. (2009 ) 28:619–30.
Not in our library10.1177/0960327109346789
- 28.
Zhou Y Kruger C Ravi GS Kumar DS Vijayasarathi SK Lavingia M. Safety evaluation of galacto-oligosaccharides: subchronic oral toxicity study in Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol Res Appl. (2017 ) 1:2397847317715864.
Not in our library10.1177/2397847317715864
- 29.
- 30.
Ambrogi V Bottacini F O'Callaghan J Casey E Van Breen J Schoemaker B. Infant-associated Bifidobacteria β-Galactosidases and their ability to synthesize galacto-oligosaccharides. Front Microbiol. (2021 ) 12:662959.
Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2021.662959
- 31.
Van Hoffen E Ruiter B Faber J M'Rabet L Knol EF Stahl B. A specific mixture of short-chain galacto-oligosaccharides and long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides induces a beneficial immunoglobulin profile in infants at high risk for allergy. Allergy. (2009 ) 64:484–87.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01765.x
- 32.
Matsuki T Tajima S Hara T Yahagi K Ogawa E Kodama H. Infant formula with galacto-oligosaccharides (OM55N) stimulates the growth of indigenous Bifidobacteria in healthy term infants. Benef Microbes. (2016 ) 7:453–61.
Not in our library10.3920/bm2015.0168
- 33.
Fanaro S Boehm G Garssen J Knol J Mosca F Stahl B. Galacto-oligosaccharides and long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides as prebiotics in infant formulas: a review. Acta Paediatr. (2005 ) 94:22–6.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02150.x
- 34.
Wilson B Whelan K. Prebiotic inulin-type fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides: definition, specificity, function, and application in gastrointestinal disorders. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2017 ) 32:64–8.
Not in our library10.1111/jgh.13700
- 35.
Moens F Verce M De Vuyst L. Lactate- and acetate-based cross-feeding interactions between selected strains of lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria and colon bacteria in the presence of inulin-type fructans. Int J Food Microbiol. (2017 ) 241:225–36.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.10.019
- 36.
Martínez-Tomé M Cedeño-Pinos C Bañón S Jiménez-Monreal AM. Rosemary extracts improved the antioxidant status of low-fat yoghurt sauces enriched with inulin. Antioxidants. (2022 ) 11:789.
Not in our library10.3390/antiox11040789
- 37.
Illippangama AU Jayasena DD Jo C Mudannayake DC. Inulin as a functional ingredient and their applications in meat products. Carbohydr Polym. (2022 ) 275:118706.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118706
- 38.
Shoaib M Shehzad A Omar M Rakha A Raza H Sharif HR. Inulin: properties, health benefits and food applications. Carbohydr Polym. (2016 ) 147:444–54.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.020
- 39.
Giri S Dutta P Giri TK. Inulin-based carriers for colon drug targeting. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. (2021 ) 64:102595.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102595
- 40.
Apolinário AC de Lima Damasceno BPG de Macêdo Beltrão NE Pessoa A Converti A da Silva JA. Inulin-type fructans: a review on different aspects of biochemical and pharmaceutical technology. Carbohydr Polym. (2014 ) 101:368–78.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.081
- 41.
Chi ZM Zhang T Cao TS Liu XY Cui W Zhao CH. Biotechnological potential of inulin for bioprocesses. Bioresour Technol. (2011 ) 102:4295–303.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.086
- 42.
Ahmed W Rashid S. Functional and therapeutic potential of inulin: a comprehensive review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2019 ) 59:1–13.
Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2017.1355775
- 43.
Lightowler H Thondre S Holz A Theis S. Replacement of glycaemic carbohydrates by inulin-type fructans from chicory (oligofructose, inulin) reduces the postprandial blood glucose and insulin response to foods: report of two double-blind, randomized, controlled trials. Eur J Nutr. (2018 ) 57:1259–68.
Not in our library10.1007/s00394-017-1409-z
- 44.
Wan X Guo H Liang Y Zhou C Liu Z Li K. The physiological functions and pharmaceutical applications of inulin: a review. Carbohydr Polym. (2020 ) 246:116589.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116589
- 45.
Lin H Wang Q Yuan M Liu L Chen Z Zhao Y. The prolonged disruption of a single-course amoxicillin on mice gut microbiota and resistome, and recovery by inulin, Bifidobacterium longum and fecal microbiota transplantation. Environ Pollut. (2020 ) 265:114651.
Not in our library10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114651
- 46.
Bastard QL Chapelet G Javaudin F Lepelletier D Montassier E. The effects of inulin on gut microbial composition: a systematic review of evidence from human studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. (2020 ) 39:403–13.
Not in our library10.1007/s10096-019-03721-w
- 47.
Agopian R Soares CA Purgatto E Cordenunsi BR Lajolo FM. Identification of fructooligosaccharides in different banana cultivars. J Agric Food Chem. (2008 ) 56:3305–10.
Not in our library10.1021/jf073011l
- 48.
Kumar VP Prashanth K Venkatesh YP. Structural analyses and immunomodulatory properties of fructo-oligosaccharides from onion (Allium cepa). Carbohydr Polym. (2015 ) 117:115–22.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.039
- 49.
Pinto-Sanchez MI Verdu EF. Non-celiac gluten or wheat sensitivity: it's complicated! Neurogastroenterol Motil. (2018 ) 30:e13392.
Not in our library10.1111/nmo.13392
- 50.
Sunu P Sunarti D Mahfudz LD Yunianto VD. Prebiotic activity of garlic (Allium sativum) extract on Lactobacillus acidophilus. Vet World. (2019 ) 12:2046.
Not in our library10.14202/vetworld.2019.2046-2051
- 51.
- 52.
Nie Y Luo F. Dietary fiber: an opportunity for a global control of hyperlipidemia. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2021 ) 2021:5542342.
Not in our library10.1155/2021/5542342
- 53.
Pinna C Vecchiato CG Bolduan C Grandi M Stefanelli C Windisch W. Influence of dietary protein and fructooligosaccharides on fecal fermentative end-products, fecal bacterial populations and apparent total tract digestibility in dogs. BMC Vet Res. (2018 ) 14:1–10.
Not in our library10.1186/s12917-018-1436-x
- 54.
Zheng Z Tao LA Ym A Miao H Lun S Hj A. FOS/GOS attenuates high-fat diet induced bone loss via reversing microbiota dysbiosis, high intestinal permeability and systemic inflammation in mice. Metabolism. (2021 ) 119:154767.
Not in our library10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154767
- 55.
Rezende ESV Lima GC Naves MM. Dietary fibers as beneficial microbiota modulators: a proposed classification by prebiotic categories. Nutrition. (2021 ) 89:111217.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nut.2021.111217
- 56.
Cho YH Lee HG Seo KH Yokoyama W Kim H. Antiobesity effect of prebiotic polyphenol-rich grape seed flour supplemented with probiotic kefir-derived lactic acid bacteria. J Agric Food Chem. (2018 ) 66:12498–511.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03720
- 57.
Rezende ESV Lima GC dos Santos Lima M Coelho ASG Naves MM. Prebiotic potential of isolated commercial dietary fibres compared to orange albedo in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species. Bioactive Carbohydrates Dietary Fibre. (2022 ) 28:100316.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bcdf.2022.100316
- 58.
Valero-Cases E Nuncio-Jáuregui N Frutos MJ. Influence of fermentation with different lactic acid bacteria and in vitro digestion on the biotransformation of phenolic compounds in fermented pomegranate juices. J Agric Food Chem. (2017 ) 65:6488.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04854
- 59.
Jin HE Choi JC Lim YT Sung MH. Prebiotic effects of poly-gamma-glutamate on bacterial flora in murine gut. J Microbiol Biotechnol. (2017 ) 27:412–415.
Not in our library10.4014/jmb.1611.11023
- 60.
Zheng LX Chen XQ Cheong KL. Current trends in marine algae polysaccharides: the digestive tract, microbial catabolism, and prebiotic potential. Int J Biol Macromol. (2020 ) 151:344–54.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.168
- 61.
Zeng H Chen P Chen C Huang C Lin S Zheng B. Structural properties and prebiotic activities of fractionated lotus seed resistant starches. Food Chem. (2018 ) 251:33–40.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.057
- 62.
Huang F Liu H Zhang R Dong L Liu L Ma Y. Physicochemical properties and prebiotic activities of polysaccharides from longan pulp based on different extraction techniques. Carbohydr Polym. (2019 ) 206:344–51.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.012
- 63.
Cockburn DW Koropatkin NM. Polysaccharide degradation by the intestinal microbiota and its influence on human health and disease. J Mol Biol. (2016 ) 428:3230–52.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2016.06.021
- 64.
- 65.
- 66.
Ashaolu TJ. Immune boosting functional foods and their mechanisms: a critical evaluation of probiotics and prebiotics. Biomed Pharmacother. (2020 ) 130:110625.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110625
- 67.
- 68.
- 69.
- 70.
- 71.
Cho YA Kim J. Effect of probiotics on blood lipid concentrations: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. (2015 ) 94:e1714.
Not in our library10.1097/md.0000000000001714
- 72.
- 73.
Oak SJ Jha R. The effects of probiotics in lactose intolerance: a systematic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2019 ) 59:1675–83.
Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2018.1425977
- 74.
Shewale RN Sawale PD Khedkar CD Singh A. Selection criteria for probiotics: a review. Int J Probiot Prebiot. (2014 ) 9:17.
Not in our library
- 75.
Sánchez B Delgado S Blanco-Míguez A Lourenço A Gueimonde M Margolles A. Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2017 ) 61:1600240.
Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.201600240
- 76.
Oelschlaeger TA. Mechanisms of probiotic actions–a review. Int J Med Microbiol. (2010 ) 300:57–62.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.08.005
- 77.
Milani C Duranti S Bottacini F Casey E Turroni F Mahony J. The first microbial colonizers of the human gut: composition, activities, and health implications of the infant gut microbiota. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. (2017 ) 81:e00036–17.
Not in our library10.1128/mmbr.00036-17
- 78.
Ding S Wang Y Yan W Li A Jiang H Fang J. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum 15-1 and fructooligosaccharides on the response of broilers to pathogenic Escherichia coli O78 challenge. PLoS ONE. (2019 ) 14:e0212079.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0212079
- 79.
Liu T Li Y Zhao M Mo Q Feng F. Weight-reducing effect of Lactobacillus plantarum ZJUFT17 isolated from sourdough ecosystem. Nutrients. (2020 ) 12:977.
Not in our library10.3390/nu12040977
- 80.
Li C Liu H Yang J Mu J Wang R Zhao X. Effect of soybean milk fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum HFY01 isolated from yak yogurt on weight loss and lipid reduction in mice with obesity induced by a high-fat diet. RSC Adv. (2020 ) 10:34276–89.
Not in our library10.1039/d0ra06977a
- 81.
Zhang Z Lv J Pan L Zhang Y. Roles and applications of probiotic Lactobacillus strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2018 ) 102:8135–43.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-018-9217-9
- 82.
Bartkiene E Özogul F Rocha JM. Bread sourdough lactic acid bacteria—technological, antimicrobial, toxin-degrading, immune system-, and faecal microbiota-modelling biological agents for the preparation of food, nutraceuticals and feed. Foods. (2022 ) 11:452.
Not in our library10.3390/foods11030452
- 83.
Rajoka MSR Mehwish HM Zhang H Ashraf M Fang H Zeng X. Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of exopolysaccharide mediated silver nanoparticle synthesized by Lactobacillus brevis isolated from Chinese koumiss. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. (2020 ) 186:110734.
Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110734
- 84.
Zhang W Ji H Zhang D Liu H Wang S Wang J. Complete genome sequencing of Lactobacillus plantarum ZLP001, a potential probiotic that enhances intestinal epithelial barrier function and defense against pathogens in pigs. Front Physiol. (2018 ) 9:1689.
Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2018.01689
- 85.
- 86.
Bested AC Logan AC Selhub EM. Intestinal microbiota, probiotics and mental health: from Metchnikoff to modern advances: part III–convergence toward clinical trials. Gut Pathog. (2013 ) 5:1–13.
Not in our library10.1186/1757-4749-5-4
- 87.
Valdemiro Carlos S. The importance of prebiotics in functional foods and clinical practice. Food Nutr Sci. (2011 ) 2:4536.
Not in our library10.4236/fns.2011.22019153
- 88.
Klaassens ES Boesten RJ Haarman M Knol J Schuren FH Vaughan EE. Mixed-species genomic microarray analysis of fecal samples reveals differential transcriptional responses of Bifidobacteria in breast-and formula-fed infants. Appl Environ Microbiol. (2009 ) 75:2668–76.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.02492-08
- 89.
Makras L De Vuyst L. The in vitro inhibition of Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria by Bifidobacteria is caused by the production of organic acids. Int Dairy J. (2006 ) 16:1049–57.
Not in our library10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.09.006
- 90.
Meng H Ba Z Lee Y Peng J Lin J Fleming JA. Consumption of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 in yogurt reduced expression of TLR-2 on peripheral blood-derived monocytes and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion in young adults. Eur J Nutr. (2017 ) 56:649–661.
Not in our library10.1007/s00394-015-1109-5
- 91.
- 92.
Dubey MR Patel VP. Probiotics: a promising tool for calcium absorption. Open Nutr J. (2018 ) 12:10.
Not in our library10.2174/1874288201812010059
- 93.
Sadiq FA Wenwei L Wei C Jianxin Z Zhang H. Transcriptional changes in Bifidobacterium bifidum involved in synergistic multispecies biofilms. Microb Ecol. (2021 ).
Not in our library10.1007/s00248-021-01904-7
- 94.
Shimizu Y Isoda K Taira Y Taira I Kondoh M Ishida I. Anti-tumor effect of a recombinant Bifidobacterium strain secreting a claudin-targeting molecule in a mouse breast cancer model. Eur J Pharmacol. (2020 ) 887:173596.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173596
- 95.
- 96.
Czerucka D Rampal P. Diversity of Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 mechanisms of action against intestinal infections. World J Gastroenterol. (2019 ) 25:2188.
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v25.i18.2188
- 97.
- 98.
Szajewska H Kołodziej M. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Saccharomyces boulardii for treating acute gastroenteritis in children—a 2020 update. Aliment Pharmacol Therap. (2020 ) 51:678–88.
Not in our library10.1111/apt.15659
- 99.
Xu Y Cui Y Yue F Liu L Shan Y Liu B. Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria: structures, physiochemical functions and applications in the food industry. Food Hydrocoll. (2019 ) 94:475–99.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.03.032
- 100.
- 101.
Wang B Kong Q Cui S Li X Gu Z Zhao J. Bifidobacterium adolescentis isolated from different hosts modifies the intestinal microbiota and displays differential metabolic and immunomodulatory properties in mice fed a high-fat diet. Nutrients. (2021 ) 13:1017.
Not in our library10.3390/nu13031017
- 102.
Huang Z Zhou X Stanton C Ross RP Zhao J Zhang H. Comparative genomics and specific functional characteristics analysis of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Microorganisms. (2021 ) 9:1992.
Not in our library10.3390/microorganisms9091992
- 103.
Mu Y Cong Y. Bacillus coagulans and its applications in medicine. Benef Microbes. (2019 ) 10:679–88.
Not in our library10.3920/bm2019.0016
- 104.
Zhou Y Zeng Z Xu Y Ying J Wang B Majeed M. Application of Bacillus coagulans in animal husbandry and its underlying mechanisms. Animals. (2020 ) 10:454.
Not in our library10.3390/ani10030454
- 105.
Nayak SK. Multifaceted applications of probiotic Bacillus species in aquaculture with special reference to Bacillus subtilis. Rev Aquacult. (2021 ) 13:862–906.
Not in our library10.1111/raq.12503
- 106.
Westerik N Kort R Sybesma W Reid G. Lactobacillus rhamnosus probiotic food as a tool for empowerment across the value chain in Africa. Front Microbiol. (2018 ) 9:1501.
Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2018.01501
- 107.
Kleerebezem M Bachmann H van Pelt-KleinJan E Douwenga S Smid EJ Teusink B. Lifestyle, metabolism and environmental adaptation in Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. (2020 ) 44:804–20.
Not in our library10.1093/femsre/fuaa033
- 108.
Burgueño JF Abreu MT. Epithelial Toll-like receptors and their role in gut homeostasis and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020 ) 17:263–78.
Not in our library10.1038/s41575-019-0261-4
- 109.
Wu Y Tang L Wang B Sun Q Zhao P Li W. The role of autophagy in maintaining intestinal mucosal barrier. J Cell Physiol. (2019 ) 234:19406–19.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.28722
- 110.
Patel S McCormick BA. Mucosal inflammatory response to Salmonella typhimurium infection. Front Immunol. (2014 ) 5:311.
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2014.00311
- 111.
Cheng FS Pan D Chang B Jiang M Sang LX. Probiotic mixture VSL# 3: an overview of basic and clinical studies in chronic diseases. World J Clin Cases. (2020 ) 8:1361.
Not in our library10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1361
- 112.
Toumi R Abdelouhab K Rafa H Soufli I Raissi-Kerboua D Djeraba Z. Beneficial role of the probiotic mixture Ultrabiotique on maintaining the integrity of intestinal mucosal barrier in DSS-induced experimental colitis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. (2013 ) 35:403–9.
Not in our library10.3109/08923973.2013.790413
- 113.
Zhu L Li J Wei C Luo T Deng Z Fan Y. A polysaccharide from Fagopyrum esculentum Moench bee pollen alleviates microbiota dysbiosis to improve intestinal barrier function in antibiotic-treated mice. Food Function. (2020 ) 11:10519–33.
Not in our library10.1039/d0fo01948h
- 114.
Scharek-Tedin L Filter M Taras D Wrede P Schmidt MF. Influence of an Enterococcus faecium probiotic on the development of Peyer's patches B cells in piglets. Arch Anim Nutr. (2009 ) 63:343–55.
Not in our library10.1080/17450390903052771
- 115.
Shida K Nanno M Nagata S. Flexible cytokine production by macrophages and T cells in response to probiotic bacteria: a possible mechanism by which probiotics exert multifunctional immune regulatory activities. Gut Microbes. (2011 ) 2:109–14.
Not in our library10.4161/gmic.2.2.15661
- 116.
- 117.
Ashraf R Shah NP. Immune system stimulation by probiotic microorganisms. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2014 ) 54:938–956.
Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2011.619671
- 118.
Miller LE Lehtoranta L Lehtinen MJ. Short-term probiotic supplementation enhances cellular immune function in healthy elderly: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies. Nutr Res. (2019 ) 64:1–8.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nutres.2018.12.011
- 119.
Duary RK Bhausaheb MA Batish VK Grover S. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory efficacy of indigenous probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Lp91 in colitis mouse model. Mol Biol Rep. (2012 ) 39:4765–75.
Not in our library10.1007/s11033-011-1269-1
- 120.
Dargahi N Johnson J Donkor O Vasiljevic T Apostolopoulos V. Immunomodulatory effects of probiotics: can they be used to treat allergies and autoimmune diseases? Maturitas. (2019 ) 119:25–38.
Not in our library10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.11.002
- 121.
Chiba Y Shida K Nagata S Wada M Bian L Wang C. Well-controlled proinflammatory cytokine responses of Peyer's patch cells to probiotic Lactobacillus casei. Immunology. (2010 ) 130:352–62.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03204.x
- 122.
Bui VT Tseng HC Kozlowska A Maung PO Kaur K Topchyan P. Augmented IFN-γ and TNF-α induced by probiotic bacteria in NK cells mediate differentiation of stem-like tumors leading to inhibition of tumor growth and reduction in inflammatory cytokine release; regulation by IL-10. Front Immunol. (2015 ) 6:576.
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2015.00576
- 123.
Pogány Simonová M Chrastinová L Lauková A. Autochtonous strain enterococcus faecium EF2019 (CCM7420), its bacteriocin and their beneficial effects in broiler rabbits—A review. Animals. (2020 ) 10:1188.
Not in our library10.3390/ani10071188
- 124.
- 125.
- 126.
Zhang CX Wang HY Chen TX. Interactions between intestinal microflora/probiotics and the immune system. Biomed Res Int. (2019 ) 2019:6764919.
Not in our library10.1155/2019/6764919
- 127.
Lerner A Neidhöfer S Matthias T. The gut microbiome feelings of the brain: a perspective for non-microbiologists. Microorganisms. (2017 ) 5:66.
Not in our library10.3390/microorganisms5040066
- 128.
Doifode T Giridharan VV Generoso JS Bhatti G Collodel A Schulz PE. The impact of the microbiota-gut-brain axis on Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology. Pharmacol Res. (2021 ) 164:105314.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105314
- 129.
Cryan JF O'Riordan KJ Cowan CS Sandhu KV Bastiaanssen TF Boehme M. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol Rev. (2019 ) 99:1877–2013.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00018.2018
- 130.
Mayer EA Tillisch K Gupta A. Gut/brain axis and the microbiota. J Clin Invest. (2015 ) 125:926–38.
Not in our library10.1172/jci76304
- 131.
- 132.
- 133.
Liu Y Wang H Gui S Zeng B Pu J Zheng P. Proteomics analysis of the gut–brain axis in a gut microbiota-dysbiosis model of depression. Transl Psychiatry. (2021 ) 11:1–8.
Not in our library10.1038/s41398-021-01689-w
- 134.
- 135.
Akkasheh G Kashani-Poor Z Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M Jafari P Akbari H Taghizadeh M. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrition. (2016 ) 32:315–20.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nut.2015.09.003
- 136.
Kazemi A Noorbala AA Azam K Eskandari MH Djafarian K. Effect of probiotic and prebiotic vs placebo on psychological outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Nutr. (2019 ) 38:522–8.
Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2018.04.010
- 137.
- 138.
- 139.
Yadav MK Kumari I Singh B Sharma KK Tiwari SK. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics: safe options for next-generation therapeutics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2022 ) 106:505–521.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-021-11646-8
- 140.
Yahfoufi N Mallet JF Graham E Matar C. Role of probiotics and prebiotics in immunomodulation. Curr Opin Food Sci. (2018 ) 20:82–91.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cofs.2018.04.006
- 141.
Vázquez-Rodríguez B Santos-Zea L Heredia-Olea E Acevedo-Pacheco L Santacruz A Gutiérrez-Uribe JA. Effects of phlorotannin and polysaccharide fractions of brown seaweed Silvetia compressa on human gut microbiota composition using an in vitro colonic model. J Funct Foods. (2021 ) 84:104596.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jff.2021.104596
- 142.
Shang Q Wang Y Pan L Niu Q Li C Jiang H. Dietary polysaccharide from Enteromorpha clathrata modulates gut microbiota and promotes the growth of Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. Mar Drugs. (2018 ) 16:167.
Not in our library10.3390/md16050167
- 143.
Liu Z Yan C Lin X Ai C Dong X Shao L. Responses of the gut microbiota and metabolite profiles to sulfated polysaccharides from sea cucumber in humanized microbiota mice. Food Funct. (2022 ) 13:4171–83.
Not in our library10.1039/d1fo04443e
- 144.
Pacheco-Ordaz R Wall-Medrano A Goñi MG Ramos-Clamont-Montfort G Ayala-Zavala JF González-Aguilar GA. Effect of phenolic compounds on the growth of selected probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol. (2018 ) 66:25–31.
Not in our library10.1111/lam.12814
- 145.
Wang T Ye Z Liu S Yang Y Dong J Wang K. Effects of crude Sphallerocarpus gracilis polysaccharides as potential prebiotics on acidifying activity and growth of probiotics in fermented milk. LWT. (2021 ) 149:111882.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111882
- 146.
Li S Heng X Guo L Lessing DJ Chu W. Lessing, and Chu, SCFAs improve disease resistance via modulate gut microbiota, enhance immune response and increase antioxidative capacity in the host. Fish Shellfish Immunol. (2022 ) 120:560–68.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.035
- 147.
- 148.
Ashaolu TJ Ashaolu JO Adeyeye SAO. Fermentation of prebiotics by human colonic microbiota in vitro and short-chain fatty acids production: a critical review. J Appl Microbiol. (2021 ) 130:677–87.
Not in our library10.1111/jam.14843
- 149.
Mikkelsen D Gidley MJ Williams BA. In vitro fermentation of bacterial cellulose composites as model dietary fibers. J Agric Food Chem. (2011 ) 59:4025–32.
Not in our library10.1021/jf104855e
- 150.
- 151.
Lu S Yin S Zhao C Fan L Hu H. Synergistic anti-colon cancer effect of glycyrol and butyrate is associated with the enhanced activation of caspase-3 and structural features of glycyrol. Food Chem Toxicol. (2020 ) 136:110952.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2019.110952
- 152.
Siddiqui MT Cresci GA. The immunomodulatory functions of butyrate. J Inflamm Res. (2021 ) 14:6025.
Not in our library10.2147/jir.s300989
- 153.
Wang J Ru X Zou Y. Effect of tea dietary fiber as prebiotics on intestinal flora. Food Res Dev. (2019 ) 40:76–82.
Not in our library
- 154.
Fei Y Chen Z Han S Zhang S Zhang T Lu Y. Role of prebiotics in enhancing the function of next-generation probiotics in gut microbiota. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2021 ) 1–18.
Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2021.1958744
- 155.
- 156.
Zheng L Yu P Zhang Y Wang P Yan W Guo B. Evaluating the bio-application of biomacromolecule of lignin-carbohydrate complexes (LCC) from wheat straw in bone metabolism via ROS scavenging. Int J Biol Macromol. (2021 ) 176:13–25.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.103
- 157.
- 158.
- 159.
Thambiraj SR Phillips M Koyyalamudi SR Reddy N. Yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) polysaccharides: antioxidant, immunomodulatory and prebiotic activities and their structural characterisation. Food Chem. (2018 ) 267:319–28.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.111
- 160.
Hu Y Yan B Chen ZS Wang L Tang W Huang C. Recent technologies for the extraction and separation of polyphenols in different plants: a review. J Renewable Mater. (2022 ) 10:1471–90.
Not in our library10.32604/jrm.2022.018811
- 161.
Hu Y Chen D Zheng P Yu J He J Mao X. The bidirectional interactions between resveratrol and gut microbiota: an insight into oxidative stress and inflammatory bowel disease therapy. Biomed Res Int. (2019 ) 2019:5403761.
Not in our library10.1155/2019/5403761
- 162.
Hamner S McInnerney K Williamson K Franklin MJ Ford TE. Bile salts affect expression of Escherichia coli O157:H7 genes for virulence and iron acquisition, and promote growth under iron limiting conditions. PLoS ONE. (2013 ) 8:e74647.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0074647
- 163.
Lopez-Siles M Duncan SH Garcia-Gil LJ MartinezMedina M. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: from microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics. ISME J. (2017 ) 11:841–52.
Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2016.176
- 164.
Dongowski G Jacobasch G Schmiedl D. Structural stability and prebiotic properties of resistant starch type 3 increase bile acid turnover and lower secondary bile acid formation. J Agric Food Chem. (2005 ) 53:9257–67.
Not in our library10.1021/jf0507792
- 165.
Barcenilla A Pryde SE Martin JC Duncan SH Stewart CS Henderson C. Phylogenetic relationships of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human gut. Appl Environ Microbiol. (2000 ) 66:1654–61.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.66.4.1654-1661.2000
- 166.
Chen M Fan B Liu S Imam KM Xie Y Wen B. The in vitro effect of fibers with different degrees of polymerization on human gut bacteria. Front Microbiol. (2020 ) 11:819.
Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2020.00819
- 167.
Li LL Wang YT Zhu LM Liu ZY Ye CQ Qin S. Inulin with different degrees of polymerization protects against diet-induced endotoxemia and inflammation in association with gut microbiota regulation in mice. Sci Rep. (2020 ) 10:1–12.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-58048-w
- 168.
Zhu L Qin S Zhai S Gao Y Li L. Inulin with different degrees of polymerization modulates composition of intestinal microbiota in mice. FEMS Microbiol Lett. (2017 ) 364:10.
Not in our library10.1093/femsle/fnx075
- 169.
Chávez BE Ledeboer AM. Drying of probiotics: optimization of formulation and process to enhance storage survival. Drying Technol. (2007 ) 25:1193–201.
Not in our library10.1080/07373930701438576
- 170.
Sun H Hua X Zhang M Wang Y Chen Y Zhang J. Whey protein concentrate, pullulan, and trehalose as thermal protective agents for increasing viability of Lactobacillus plantarum starter by spray drying. Food Sci Anim Resources. (2020 ) 40:118.
Not in our library10.5851/kosfa.2019.e94
- 171.
Fonseca F Cenard S Passot S. Freeze-Drying of Lactic Acid Bacteria, Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols. New York, NY: Springer (2015 ). p. 477–88.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4939-2193-5_24
- 172.
Semyonov D Ramon O Kaplun Z Levin-Brener L Gurevich N Shimoni E. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus paracasei by spray freeze drying. Food Res Int. (2010 ) 43:193–202.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.028
- 173.
Savedboworn W Kerdwan N Sakorn A Charoen R Tipkanon S Pattayakorn K. Role of protective agents on the viability of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum during freeze drying and subsequent storage. Int Food Res J. (2017 ) 2:787–94.
Not in our library
- 174.
Shu G Yang X Li C Huang D Lei Z He C. Comprehensive optimization of composite cryoprotectant for Saccharomyces boulardii during freeze-drying and evaluation of its storage stability. Preparat Biochem Biotechnol. (2019 ) 49:846–57.
Not in our library10.1080/10826068.2019.1630649
- 175.
da Silva Guedes J Pimentel TC Diniz-Silva HT da Cruz Almeida ET Tavares JF de Souza EL. Protective effects of β-glucan extracted from spent brewer yeast during freeze-drying, storage and exposure to simulated gastrointestinal conditions of probiotic lactobacilli. LWT. (2019 ) 116:108496.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108496
- 176.
Peighambardoust SH Tafti AG Hesari J. Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2011 ) 22:215–24.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009
- 177.
Pawlak A Belbekhouche S. Controlling the growth of Escherichia coli by layer-by-layer encapsulation. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. (2021 ) 206:111950.
Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111950
- 178.
Verruck S de Liz GR Dias CO Amboni RD Prudencio ES. Effect of full-fat goat's milk and prebiotics use on Bifidobacterium BB-12 survival and on the physical properties of spray-dried powders under storage conditions. Food Res Int. (2019 ) 119:643–52.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.042
- 179.
Dantas A Verruck S de Liz GR Hernandez E Prudencio ES. Lactose-free skim milk and prebiotics as carrier agents of Bifidobacterium BB-12 microencapsulation: physicochemical properties, survival during storage and in vitro gastrointestinal condition behaviour. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2021 ) 56:2132–45.
Not in our library10.1111/ijfs.14823
Cited by papers we hold 1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.