Corrigendum: Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective
Stephen Waite, Arkadij Grigorian, Robert G. Alexander and 10 more
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2019
doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00272 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
In the original article, there was a mistake in the caption for Figure 5. The caption incorrectly states that the figure was from (Reed, Ryan, McEntee, Evanoff, & Brennan, 2011) however the figure was reprinted from (Litchfield & Donovan, 2016) with permission. The correct legend appears below. The authors apologize for this error and note that it does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.---Figure 5. Reprinted from (Litchfield & Donovan, 2016) with permission. Two different experience groups – expert radiologists and psychology students—searched for lung nodules from CXR images using the flash-preview moving window (FPMW) paradigm. Participants looked at the target word for 15 s (“lung nodule”). They then saw a fixation cross for 200 ms, then either a mask preview (random array of colored pixels) or a CXR (a ‘scene’ preview) for 250 ms. Next, participants saw a mask for 50 ms and then a second fixation cross for 400 ms. Following a second presentation of the fixation cross, they conducted a windowed search, with a 2.5-degree radius window restricting the field of view (Litchfield & Donovan, 2016)--
Abstract licence: CC BY
References2
2 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.