Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

A RCT COMPARING SPECIFIC INTENSIVE COGNITIVE TRAINING TO ASPECIFIC PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION IN RRMSThe SMICT study

Flavia eMattioli, Chiara eStampatori, Fabio eBellomi and 13 more

Frontiers in Neurology · 2015

doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00278 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Specific cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis (MS) resulted to be effective compared to no treatment. So far the possible role of an aspecific psychological intervention on cognition has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the SMICT RCT was to compare the efficacy of a specific cognitive training with an aspecific psychological intervention in relapsing-remitting MS patients. METHODS: From a sample of 150 patients, with the same disability and immunomodulatory therapy, submitted to neuropsychological examination, 45 impaired in at least one test were included and 41 randomized to have either a specific cognitive training for the impaired function (22) or to an aspecific psychological intervention (19) for 4 months, starting after baseline examination. Neuropsychological tests and functional scales were administered at baseline and 1 year later. RESULTS: After 1 year, the mean number of pathological tests was significantly lower in the specific treatment group, compared to the aspecific group. Memory and attention/speeded information processing functions were mostly improved. Depression and quality of life were not different between groups at follow up. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that an intensive and domain specific cognitive approach results to be more effective than aspecific psychological intervention in patients with MS.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References34

    34 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.