Network Connectivity in Epilepsy: Resting State fMRI and EEG–fMRI Contributions

1The notion of networks in epilepsy has gained momentum in the last decade, becoming a key concept used to explain the phenomena observed in this condition. Seizure generation, spread and termination as well as therapeutic response and cognitive impairment may be explained by the interactions between, and dysfunction of, large-scale networks. Early evidence for the involvement of macroscopic networks in epilepsy syndromes arises from EEG studies and, for the last decade, several authors have developed a framework based on brain networks to explain various features of epilepsy. There is a growing body of evidence pointing toward large-scale networks, often bihemispheric and involving several lobes, underlying seizures in different epileptic syndromes.

2Imaging studies have been one of the main contributors to the development of this network framework and have provided relevant information for the characterization of macroscopic network abnormalities in the epileptic brain. Functional MRI is a powerful tool to investigate connectivity and organization of brain networks via differences in evoked responses to different stimuli. Resting state fMRI (RS-fMRI) has become an increasingly popular way to employ fMRI that investigates synchronous activity between regions in the absence of an explicit task based on signal correlation. These studies have shown that there is a consistent pattern of spatially distinct, brain networks that show coherent signal fluctuations. RS-fMRI studies have been used to identify network abnormalities in many different pathologies including epilepsy.

3Different approaches have been applied to the investigation of network connectivity in RS-fMRI studies. The first most commonly used methodology is seed-based correlation maps, where the correlation between a priori defined regions of interest (ROI) is calculated within a temporal frequency range and used as an index of connectivity. Regions can contain common variance from various noise sources and this need to be removed, for example via regression or partial correlation. This approach can be extended by using an anatomical parcelation of the brain from the lobar to the voxel scale and correlating every region with all other regions before comparing the resulting correlation matrix. These matrices represent a measure of the whole brain connectivity (connectome) and can be thresholded and binarized to obtain summaries of network properties using graph theory such as clustering, path length, and betweenness centrality. Each of these metrics has well characterized implications for networks in terms of properties such as their efficiency for information transfer and robustness to damage.

4Several metrics have been used to look at measures of correlation with some spatial support; these include methods such as regional homogeneity (ReHo), functional integration, and global brain asymmetry.

5The second main method is spatial independent component analysis of fMRI data that separates the signal into spatial maps of covarying voxels. Components that are related to brain activity then need to be identified as resting state networks by selecting them from components related to sources of noise. This is typically done by looking at the spatial and temporal properties of the components.

6Brain network connectivity is not static and so the investigation of network dynamics is an important further step. Not only correlations, but causality between nodes can be evaluated. This has been achieved for example through biophysical computational models such as dynamic causal models (DCM), structural equation modeling, and granger causality. Although some methods have shown their robustness on modeling causal statistical influences between simultaneously recorded neural time series data, the use of these methods in fMRI data is still controversial. This is due to the inherent limitations of fMRI: slow dynamics, regional variability of the hemodynamic response to underlying neuronal activity and the complexities of image acquisition (differences in slice timing). These methods must be used with care and with an appropriate understanding of their limitations.

7Not only analysis methodology but also the definition of rest is different across RS-fMRI studies. Subjects may be instructed to rest with the eyes closed or open with or without visual fixation and these may be a confounding factor; in epilepsy drowsiness may be associated with a different rate of interictal activity and this may be influenced by the instructions given to the subject.

8More detail information on the history, development of methods and limitations of RS-fMRI studies can be found in these reviews. The development of simultaneous EEG–fMRI acquisition has enabled a major step to be taken toward the identification of network abnormalities related to epileptic activity. Detailed information about the methodology and its evolution can be found in recent reviews.

9EEG–fMRI can be thought of as an extension of RS-fMRI, where the lack of a model of fMRI changes defined by an experimental paradigm is replaced by a post hoc electrophysiologically defined model of brain state. In studies of epilepsy, this is typically achieved by defining epochs of pathologic (e.g., interictal epileptiform discharges or ictal activity) versus normal background activity, although a similar approach can be applied to derive a model from physiological rhythms (e.g., alpha and beta). A voxel-wise analysis can then proceed to identify the brain regions with fMRI changes associated with these electrophysiological features.

10Early application of EEG–fMRI was aimed at better characterization and more accurate localization of the brain areas involved in interictal spike generation, but it soon evolved into a research tool capable of investigating brain function in diseased and healthy populations.

11However, it became clear that EEG–fMRI studies often revealed networks commonly reported in RS-fMRI studies. Despite this commonality and potential convergence of results there is very little cross reference between studies looking into brain networks at rest in epilepsy and EEG–fMRI studies, making it timely to comparatively summarize the findings from each strand of literature. One of the key questions that arise is regarding the role that epileptic transients might play in the findings of RS-fMRI studies, where this factor has been largely neglected.

12The interaction between these two (network connectivity and epileptic transients) may be of a bidirectional nature. While the often transient stochastic nature of interictal and ictal discharges might imply a transition between (bi-stable) states it seems likely that these events occur in patients because of an alteration in network properties that facilitates abnormal synchronization within and between brain regions (or makes these transitions more likely by altering the systems dynamics). The properties of the epileptic network seem to evolve over multiple timescales, indexed by the typical clinical observations that epileptic events frequency is modulated by cognitive load, sleep, stress, and disease duration. Therefore, we need to better understand and evaluate network structure in epilepsy and the dynamic changes occurring within it at multiple timescales (from milliseconds to years).

13Since some RS-fMRI studies have found an association between network abnormalities and clinical variables that in turn often correlate with frequency of epileptic transients (i.e., age of epilepsy onset, duration of epilepsy, response to treatment, and cognitive function), it makes sense to consider that the integration of this information in the investigation of network abnormalities in epilepsy will lead to novel ways of interpreting network changes observed.

14The integration of EEG information into network connectivity analysis requires the dynamic of connectivity to be considered. Classically, connectivity studies have assumed network connectivity can be characterized as the mean over a period of time (an fMRI session). This is represented in Figure 1A. Inferences about network connectivity differences between patients and controls have been estimated by comparing average connectivity. The addition of the temporal dimension (Figure 1B) opens the door to explore the interaction between connectivity and epileptic activity.

15In this review, network abnormalities reported by RS-fMRI and EEG–fMRI studies are compared side to side and the role of epileptic transients in the RS-fMRI findings to date is discussed. Finally, we propose and discuss a framework to investigate the interaction of epileptic transients in connectivity (Figures 1A,B) and the potential applications of this framework (Figure 1C).

16The epileptogenic network refers to the areas involved in generation and spread of epileptic activity. These networks may vary across the different syndromes. Epilepsy syndromes have traditionally been classified based on the electro-clinical patterns, into focal and primary generalized syndromes. Focal epilepsies are defined by EEG correlates circumscribed to an area of the cortex as opposed to generalized syndromes in which the totality of the cortex is thought to be involved in seizure generation.

17Although this classical view marks a clear difference based on the extent of cortex involved in seizure generation, there is a growing body of evidence pointing toward the involvement of large-scale networks underlying both the focal and the generalized syndromes as well as evidence of epileptic activity being focally initiated in idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). From this perspective, the boundaries between “focal” and “generalized” epilepsies have become more blurred. Under this framework, the concept of zones (e.g., the epileptogenic zone), adopted from the stand point of epilepsy surgery can become more general in meaning. The epileptogenic zone and seizure onset zone could be exchanged for the network nodes that (by removal) can alter the network properties such that seizures cannot be generated. The network framework makes the potential range of processes and mechanisms of seizure generation and spread more varied; seizures arising from a hyper excitable region may entrain a larger neural network. Furthermore, recent theoretical studies of networks suggests that the network structure itself can generate seizures with or without the hyper excitable region.

18Resting state fMRI studies in patients with epilepsy have provided extensive information about abnormalities in the epileptogenic networks in the different epileptic syndromes (Table 1).

19The majority of RS-fMRI studies in focal epilepsies have focused on temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). TLE has the advantage of being one of the most prevalent and homogeneous group within the focal epilepsy syndromes, and although it provides a good model for investigating abnormalities in the epileptogenic network, the impact of these findings for surgical management of patients is limited given the efficacy of standard pre-surgical evaluation and surgical approaches in this group.

20The epileptogenic network in TLE is relatively well characterized, comprising of a number of structures in the mesial temporal lobe (amygdala and hippocampus), adjacent cortex including entorhinal cortex and lateral temporal cortex and extra temporal structures including thalamus and orbito-frontal cortex. The contralateral homologous regions serve the rapid spread of seizure activity. Connectivity maps seeding in these areas of the epileptogenic network have shown a number of abnormalities, comprising decreased connectivity within a set of sub regions in the epileptic temporal lobe, decreased connectivity between hippocampi, and decreased connectivity between the hippocampus and the orbito-frontal region. Decreased connectivity is the most common finding among those studies targeting the epileptogenic network; hence it is interesting to compare these findings with other measures of neuronal connectivity such as EEG. Although not recorded simultaneously, intracranial EEG (icEEG) showed an increase in connectivity between the same subset of regions found to be less connected by fMRI. Connectivity of the epileptogenic regions measured by EEG has shown diverse results. Classically, hyper-synchrony within the epileptogenic regions has been shown using intracranial electrodes, however, evidence of decreased synchronization of electrical activity have also been reported during ictal and interictal states. Variability of connectivity between studies in the epileptogenic regions may be in part explained by the difference in methodology between studies (type of intracranial electrodes, the analysis method applied to the data and the regions included in the network). However, the investigation of temporal dynamics of EEG-based connectivity shows that the desynchronization in the epileptogenic regions fluctuate at different time points.

21The relationship between network connectivity as measured by EEG and fMRI has barely been explored. Recently, we introduced a framework to investigate this in EEG–fMRI data acquired simultaneously (Deligianni et al., submitted). In this work, we showed that EEG-based connectivity had more intra-hemispheric components compared with MRI-based connectivity that showed a predominance of inter-hemispheric connections. The prediction of connectivity patterns from one modality to the other worked better when fMRI is predicted from EEG than vice versa, indicating that EEG connectivity may have a greater level of complexity compared to that derived from fMRI.

22Further research is needed to be done in order to further understand the relationship between the connectivity measured by these two modalities and in turn to interpret the similarities and discrepancies seen in the pathological brain.

23Although the majority of RS-fMRI studies report decreases of connectivity within the epileptogenic network, there are also reports of increased connectivity. These increases may be located in areas overlapping the epileptogenic region, but are typically reported in areas outside the epileptogenic region suggesting a compensatory mechanism: Bettus et al. reported in several studies that connectivity was increased in the homologous network contralateral to the disrupted epileptogenic network in TLE, which are known to be propagation areas.

24Whole brain connectivity analysis have found abnormalities in areas belonging to the epileptogenic network: using ReHo analysis of fMRI as a measure of abnormal local synchronicity, Mankinen et al. have reported abnormalities in the right temporal lobe and default mode network (DMN) areas in a sample of patients with left and right non-lesional TLE. In another voxel-by-voxel analysis of local and long distance connectivity, Stufflebeam et al. have shown abnormalities co-localized with the epileptogenic zone defined by icEEG in patients with focal epilepsy of different locations.

25Similarly, in patients with IGE, several studies have investigated abnormalities in the epileptogenic networks by creating connectivity maps from areas found to be involved in the seizure generation in these syndromes. The thalamus and the basal ganglia are most commonly chosen as seed regions, and they typically show reduced connectivity with other components in the network, mainly subcortical structures and orbito-frontal cortex. There are also reports of increased connectivity between hemispheres as shown by Bai et al. in the lateral aspect of the orbito-frontal cortex in patients with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) using two independent connectivity analysis methods (ROI seed maps and a voxel-by-voxel approach).

26Methods that do not use a priori spatial hypothesis such as ICA, voxel-by-voxel connectivity analysis, or ReHo analysis have also pointed to the existence connectivity abnormalities in the so called cortico-subcortical network. In the study by Moeller et al., the component corresponding to the cortico-subcortical network was found to be highly correlated with the interictal activity recorded simultaneously providing strong evidence that the epileptiform transients play a key role in the connectivity abnormalities uncovered by RS-fMRI in IGE.

27Just a few studies have investigated how connectivity changes relate to clinical factors. Morgan et al. showed that the initial disruption of inter-hippocampal connectivity evolves into an increased connectivity after 10 years of disease duration in TLE. Directionality of the hippocampal influence also changes with the duration of epilepsy; in general there is a left over right hippocampal influence, regardless the side of epilepsy, however, this relationship is switched in patients with epilepsy duration >10 years where the contralateral hippocampus has the dominating influence over the affected one.

28Connectivity changes have been also related with memory function in TLE: memory scores are preserved in those patients with stronger connectivity to the contralateral temporal lobe and in those with stronger intra-hippocampal connectivity and between hippocampus and frontal areas; and conversely, decreased connectivity to the orbito-frontal cortex was related to poorer memory performance.

29EEG–fMRI was conceived as a technique to map the epileptogenic networks. In focal epilepsies, several studies have shown found a good concordance between the regions of BOLD signal change during interictal activity and the epileptogenic regions mapped by standard techniques. It has been estimated that EEG–fMRI can contribute to more accurately localize the epileptic focus in around 2/3 of pre-surgical cases as compared to the standard pre-surgical tests.

30Similarly, in IGE, a large number of EEG–fMRI studies have characterized the networks involved in the generation of epileptic activity. Common findings across studies show activation of a cortico-subcortical network composed by mid-frontal regions, thalami, caudate, and cerebellum during the occurrence of generalized spike-waves.

31From early EEG–fMRI studies, it was noted that responses are often multiple and distributed in areas within the epileptic focus but also remotely located from epileptogenic regions in the case of focal epilepsies. Changes in BOLD signal have been reported on the contralateral homologous cortex, as well as extra temporal regions in patients with TLE and (predominantly negative) responses in DMN areas. This supports the presence of large-scale, often bilateral networks underlying focal epilepsies and the involvement of other networks such as the DMN during epileptic activity.

32There is on-going work aimed at objectively deriving the epileptogenic zone from EEG–fMRI maps in order to provide information that can be used for surgical evaluation. Different authors have chosen different statistical methods for its definition: from the global maxima of response, to the number of voxels within the cluster. Several methods have aim to separate regions of propagation from those involved in initiation such as electrical source imaging (ESI) of interictal spikes. These methods have been tested against surgical outcome, which is the gold standard for the localization of the epileptogenic network and more importantly assessing clinical utility. Good surgical outcome has been associated with the inclusion of the global maxima of response being within the resection margins. On the contrary, responses discordant with the area of surgery, and widespread responses are a marker of poor prognosis this was also observed in a group of patients with focal cortical dysplasia (confirmed post-resection) whose post-surgical prognosis is typically good likely indicating multifocal disease.

33The dynamics of epileptic networks in focal epilepsy and in IGE have been investigated using DCM and sliding window analysis, aiming to identify the temporal and causal relationship between network nodes.

34In IGE, crucial subcomponents of the network such as the thalamus have been targeted to further define their role, which could potentially inform targets for future therapies such as deep brain stimulation. However, there is still no consensus between the different studies as to the lead node or the exact role of the thalamus. There are several factors that might explain these discrepant results. Firstly, there is some methodological uncertainty in the temporal relationship between generalized spike and wave discharges (GSW) and fMRI changes with several studies indicating fMRI changes can precede GSW events. Further, the methods used in different studies to infer causality are not consistent and neither are the network nodes. This suggest that further work is needed both from a computational perspective to better predict how GSW arise and a modeling perspective to better test these predictions with experimental data.

35Even though EEG–fMRI and RS-fMRI studies have been able to identify networks involved in the generation and spread of epileptiform activity, the interpretation of the findings greatly differs between these two approaches. Whereas EEG–fMRI studies allow inference that the changes observed are related to interictal activity, RS-fMRI cannot differentiate, which changes observed in the network may be due to transient or permanent network abnormalities. This is important, for example when trying to understand the mechanism for treatment response or effects of disease duration; is the network connectivity fundamentally altered or is it that the number of transient events and transient changes in connectivity has been reduced?

36Resting state fMRI studies have extensively investigated networks involved in cognitive processes and sensory-motor processing in the different epileptic syndromes (Table 2).

37Abnormalities include decreased connectivity in language network, memory network, auditory and sensorimotor networks as well as increases in connectivity of visual and dorsal attention networks in patients with focal epilepsies. In IGE in whom cognition is expected not to be grossly abnormal, increased connectivity was found within the nodes of the attention network and between attention network and adjacent the supplementary motor area. Also self-referential, somatosensory, visual, and auditory networks connectivity is increased in IGE patients compared to controls.

38In the case of cognitive networks, there is a higher variability between the changes observed as both reports of increases and decreases in connectivity are found in the literature in similar numbers.

39The increases in connectivity observed in some studies have been associated to efficient compensatory changes that maintain cognitive function, but there are also notable reports of poorer function associated with the abnormal increase in connectivity between networks. For example, in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) increased SMA and working memory network functional connectivity was linked with increased demands in working memory function. This finding offered an explanation for the myoclonic jerks associated with cognitive-motor tasks that are found in this syndrome. Similarly, in patients with TLE, increased connectivity of working memory networks to the diseased hippocampus was associated with poorer performance in working memory tests.

40How epileptic transients may affect these RS-fMRI findings is uncertain due to the lack of studies investigating this potential influence. In a report by Chaudhary et al., EEG activity was monitored during a working memory–fMRI session; task related activation was found to be significantly decrease during the epileptic transient period. Interestingly, a modulatory effect of the task was also found on the frequency of epileptic activity that in turn was associated with task performance. In reflex epilepsies, the interaction between epileptic activity and cognitive network connectivity becomes even more pertinent, Vaudano et al. showed in a patient with reading epilepsy, that areas within the cognitive network involved in reading (left prefrontal cortex) played a causal role in initiating reading-evoked seizures, potentially by facilitating activity in the epileptogenic cortex, in this case, located in the premotor cortex. These reports again show the need for the application of EEG information to better understand connectivity changes within and between cognitive networks in patients with epilepsy.

41Abnormalities in the DMN deserve special attention due to the extended literature in this regard both from RS-fMRI and EEG–fMRI studies. In relation to interictal activity in focal epilepsies, EEG–fMRI studies have found BOLD signal changes in DMN with differences in the strength and pattern between TLE and extra-TLE. DMN BOLD changes are also common to patients with IGE. These studies, across focal and IGE, point predominantly to a decrease of BOLD signal in DMN during epileptic transients.

42A recent study has provided relevant insights about the electrophysiological correlates of this phenomena: a decrease of gamma power and increase of lower frequencies, occurs synchronously with interictal activity in the main nodes of DMN when recorded with icEEG. This may explain the negative change in BOLD signal found in these areas coupled with epileptic activity, and confirms that the coupling between the BOLD and EEG signals remains intact.

43Although there have been many studies finding DMN alterations in epilepsy there remains large gaps in our understanding of the interaction between the epileptogenic network and the DMN. Interestingly, a study using effective connectivity showed that this response in the precuneus was predictive of changes within the thalamo-cortical regions. This is consistent with the idea that conscious attention (indexed by the precuneus) modulates the connectivity of the thalamo-cortical loop and can therefore alter the probability of GSW generation.

44Resting state fMRI studies have extensively investigated DMN and have consistently reported abnormal connectivity within the DMN and between the DMN and epileptogenic regions in focal epilepsies and IGE. The most common finding is a decrease in the connectivity within DMN and between the epileptogenic regions with DMN. However, there are also some reports of increased connectivity in certain nodes like the precuneus.

45The correlation between the DMN and functioning of other cognitive networks in fMRI and its proven strong correlation with the epileptic activity points toward the need to test cognitive networks abnormalities in epileptic patients in light of the EEG information.

46Mathematical tools to derive global network organization such as graph theory have been applied to fMRI (and more rarely EEG) data to identify abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. In this section, we will discuss the changes in global network organization found in patients with epilepsy (Table 3).

47Graph theory based analysis has shown that brain networks in patients with epilepsy follow a small world type topology, similar to healthy subjects. However, significant differences in the parameters that define the small world connectivity have been detected in comparison to controls: patients with focal epilepsy have an increased modularity and interhemispheric connections as well as abnormal degree, strength closeness, clustering coefficient, and betweenness centrality. Liao et al. showed these abnormalities were more marked in the epileptogenic networks and DMN of patients with TLE. In IGE, increased integration and nodularity in the cortico-subcortical network and decrease degree and nodularity of DMN nodes have been reported.

48Using global connectivity asymmetry and interhemispheric coherence as measures, patients with focal and generalized epilepsy, showed higher global asymmetry and lower interhemispheric coherence compared to controls. These abnormalities were more prominent in the temporal and limbic networks across both focal and IGE patients.

49The clinical meaning of these findings is uncertain and only a few studies have included correlations with some clinical aspects of epilepsy such as disease duration.

50The majority of the studies applying graph theoretical analysis or voxel-wise analysis primarily set out to find differential characteristics that correctly classify patients with epilepsy from healthy control groups. Although this approach may be useful in other neurological conditions such as Alzheimer’s, where presymptomatic diagnosis is important, the clinical applicability is unclear in epilepsy where diagnosis is based on the occurrence of spontaneous seizures and the prediction of populations at risk remains speculative.

51One of the aspects that need to be explored is the effect that the transient epileptic activity may have on these network properties, which has not yet been address by any of the studies and will provide useful information on the relation of these measures and the physiopathology of the disease. Further work is required to determine if these RS-fMRI measures can become a useful biomarker of disease progression (beyond potentially simply indexing interictal event rate) and therefore help to measure therapeutic efficacy or predict treatment response.

52The effect of epileptiform activity on the networks abnormalities described in RS-fMRI studies has been largely neglected. Only a few RS-fMRI studies have included EEG information in their analysis. The most common approach has been to use the EEG to exclude the presence of interictal activity during RS-fMRI. In the absence of interictal activity on scalp EEG, Pittau et al. found decreased connectivity within the DMN and in the epileptogenic network of TLE patients and similar findings have been seen in patients with IGE. Mankinen et al. reported similar findings on those patients whose EEG acquired previously to scan was showing no interictal activity, however an important limitation of this study is that presence of epileptiform activity during the scanning session cannot be ruled out due to its intermittent nature and change in prevalence in certain states (i.e., when drowsy).

53Conversely, where a direct comparison between RS-fMRI sessions with and without the occurrence of spikes has been made have shown that the network abnormalities reported are more marked during the occurrence of interictal activity. In IGE, increased connectivity of epileptogenic network involving basal ganglia and decreased connectivity in DMN, cognitive control network (CCN) and affective network (AN) were greater during those sessions with occurrence of GSW compared to those without.

54Mankinen et al. showed that ReHo abnormalities have a different distribution depending on the presence/absence of interictal activity on EEG acquired prior to the fMRI. Moeller et al. and Rodionov found that ICA can identify a component that spatially correlates with the cortico-subcortical network that is temporally correlated with epileptic transients.

55There is only one RS-fMRI study where the correlation between interictal EEG activity and brain connectivity abnormalities was quantified. Using amplitude of low frequency oscillations (ALFF) as measure of resting connectivity in a subgroup of six patients with mTLE; increased connectivity was measured within mesial temporal lobe networks of patients, which correlated with the number of interictal events. This suggests that interictal activity was likely to be largely responsible for the network abnormalities observed.

56There are two main challenges when approaching the integration of EEG information (i.e., epileptic activity) in fMRI connectivity analysis. The first limitation is scalp EEG’s sensitivity to capture epileptiform abnormalities; icEEG recordings show that only a portion of the epileptiform activity is captured by scalp EEG. This limitation needs to be taken into account in those studies that describe connectivity changes in the absence of epileptic activity monitored by scalp EEG. Acquisition of simultaneous icEEG–fMRI offers one possible solution to this sensitivity limitation while the extraction of scalp EEG information not visually identifiable remains another. The second limitation is to define the concept of abnormality in the EEG of patients with epilepsy. The classical definition of epileptiform abnormalities, useful from the clinical point of view, constrains EEG modeling to a number of abnormal features whereas EEG (and MEG) research is providing new insights into different ways of exploring and defining EEG background activity and its relation to RS-fMRI derived networks.

57Abnormalities in brain networks are likely to be present in epilepsy without visible epileptiform activity in scalp EEG as evidenced by structural connectivity changes but to differentiate the more permanent and transient connectivity changes might have implications; for example in understanding how treatment of the transient epileptic events might reverse their cognitive impact.

58In general, to understand the sequelae of altered brain connectivity in terms of cognition and seizure likelihood, both clinically important questions, we need to disambiguate and understand the effect of brain network alterations occurring over different timescales; millisecond changes related to IEDs, tens of seconds as measured by RS-fMRI and permanent changes (e.g., measured using diffusion tensor imaging). EEG–fMRI therefore has a role to play in the functional connectivity changes occurring in the milliseconds – tens of seconds domain.

59Resting state fMRI studies in epilepsy have derived information with regards to network dysfunction within and across epilepsy syndromes. In both, focal and generalized epileptic syndromes abnormalities are seen in large-scale networks usually involving more than one lobe, and with bilateral distribution. Some of the network abnormalities have common features like the disruption of DMN and the thalamo-cortical patterns seen across syndromes with spike and wave discharges (see Tables 1–3). These findings are consistent with EEG–fMRI studies, primarily modeling fMRI changes to interictal events which have also shown large-scale networks associated with epileptic activity, including changes in networks such as the DMN. However, open questions remain regarding how the RS network changes found correlate to key aspects of epilepsy such as seizure and IED generation, response to treatment (pharmacological and surgical) and cognitive dysfunction.

60The strength of combined EEG–fMRI lies in the ability to define brain state and add a different range of temporal scales for assessment of dynamic changes in network activity. This allows for the identification and separation of pathologic features and their characterization.

61EEG–fMRI has had some level of validation as a pre-surgical assessment tool; however it is likely to be useful in a subset of patients and requires specialist equipment and knowledge, limiting its availability to major epilepsy centers. RS-fMRI has relatively little evidence of clinical utility in pre-surgical assessment, where it needs to be predictive or diagnostic in terms of localization in individuals to have clinical impact.

62We propose the integration of both methods as the forward step to link the abnormalities of network connectivity to the pathophysiological phenomena of the disease.

63Figure 1 summarizes the questions and hypothesis derived from this review. Given the episodic nature of epileptic activity, it seems appropriate to represent functional connectivity as a dynamic trajectory through a connectivity space with time (Figure 1A). Connectivity, as indexed by fMRI correlations between regions will depend on brain state: during cognitive tasks, we expect a higher connectivity if the nodes are involved in that task (A-1 pale green area), lower connectivity if they are not (A-1, green area), and a small variability in connectivity given that cognitive processes, typically require functional segregation. In contrast, at rest, mean connectivity of that same network will be expected to be significantly different and have greater variability due to the relatively unconstrained nature of the resting state (A-2). In the case of patients with epilepsy, there is an additional component that has been found to induce changes in connectivity: epileptic transients (A-3). Meanwhile, resting state studies have determined that the mean connectivity of patients with epilepsy is abnormal, the contribution of transients to these findings is yet to be properly characterized.

64In our view, the understanding of the effect of connectivity changes associated with epileptic transients on the overall RS connectivity is crucial for interpreting the findings of RS-fMRI studies to date and to understand the interaction between RS-fMRI networks in epileptic processes or cognitive co-morbidities. Current RS-fMRI studies capture connectivity changes as an average over time showing differences from controls (Figure 1B: where patient’s connectivity is represented by yellow area and controls in blue).

65Epileptic transient’s rate and seizure activity may be modulated by a number of factors that occur over different timescales: from treatment to cognitive activity or external/internal factors such as hormones, sleep, or sensory stimulation. This might be because they cause changes in brain connectivity that takes them toward or away from network connectivity configuration that are associated with epileptic states (represented by the red area). One clear example is reflex epilepsies, where changes in the network involved in reading precede the seizure onset as measured by EEG–fMRI in a case with reading epilepsy.

66To understand the effect on resting state networks of any factor of interest that interacts with epileptic transients we need to first understand their role in the global RS connectivity in epilepsy.

67Taking as an example drug treatment response, we can hypothesize a change in RS connectivity based on the modification of epileptic transients due to treatment (Figure 1C): progressive decrease in epileptic activity may result in network connectivity taking values that fall outside the “epileptic transient connectivity zone” and in turn that are more similar to controls connectivity. The characterization of these changes may allow RS-fMRI results to be used as a marker of relevant aspects of the disease at different time scales: such as response to treatment, cognitive effects of epilepsy, transition between interictal and ictal states, or chronic effects of disease progression.

68Resting state fMRI and connectivity analysis is a fast developing field of research and is therefore set to benefit from substantial methodological advances with faster data acquisition, reduced artifacts and improved and better validated analysis procedures.

69Future work needs to ground results in clinically observed features such as the change in epileptiform activity, or seizure rates over different timescales, e.g., with different levels of attention, in different sleep states, or over months or years of disease progression. Therefore, allowing us to better understand how changes in brain networks occurring over different timescales contribute to the clinical manifestations of epilepsy and their control. While RS-fMRI provides an important non-invasive tool to evaluate network structure in epilepsy the addition of EEG recording should allow for better inference regarding the dynamic changes occurring at multiple timescales in epilepsy.

70The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.