Transcriptional Dysregulation Study Reveals a Core Network Involving the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease
Guofeng Meng, Guofeng Meng, Hongkang Mei
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2019
doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00101 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Background The pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease is associated with dysregulation at different levels from transcriptome to cellular functioning. Such complexity necessitates investigations of disease etiology to be carried out considering multiple aspects of the disease and the use of independent strategies. The established works more emphasized on the structural organization of gene regulatory network while neglecting the internal regulation changes. Methods Applying a strategy different from popularly used co-expression network analysis, this study investigated the transcriptional dysregulations during the transition from normal to disease states. Results 97 genes were predicted as dysregulated genes, which were also associated with clinical outcomes of Alzheimer’s disease. Both the co-expression and differential co-expression analysis suggested these genes to be interconnected as a core network and that their regulations were strengthened during the transition to disease states. Functional studies suggested the dysregulated genes to be associated with aging and synaptic function. Further, we checked the evolutionary conservation of the gene co-expression and found that human and mouse brain might have divergent transcriptional co-regulation even when they had conserved gene expression profiles. Conclusion Overall, our study reveals a profile of transcriptional dysregulation in the genesis of Alzheimer’s disease by forming a core network with altered regulation; the core network is associated with Alzheimer’s diseases by affecting the aging and synaptic functions related genes; the gene regulation in brain may not be conservative between human and mouse.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References57
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 24.
- 27.
- 36.
- 37.
- 46.
- 49.
48 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Cited by papers we hold1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.