Long-term use of riluzole could improve the prognosis of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a real-world cohort study in China
Lu Chen, Xiaolu Liu, Lu Tang and 2 more
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2016
doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00246 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of riluzole in a long-term follow-up of cohort with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis(ALS) in a real-world study.Methods: Patients with ALS between 2007 and 2013 were followed up every three months. Survival and tracheotomy were predefined as primary outcome measures. The cumulative defined daily dose(cDDD) of riluzole was estimated. The patients in the riluzole group were classified into 1 of 3 subgroups according to the cDDD quartiles. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.Results: Of the 1,540 ALS patients, 415 (26.9%) used riluzole, and the remainder did not. In the riluzole group, the age at onset was greater (p=0.016), the diagnostic delay was shorter (p<0.0005), the body mass index (BMI) was higher (p<0.0005), and the scores for both the functional rating scale (FRS) and the revised FRS (FRS-R) were higher (ps<0.0005) than those of the control group. The median cDDD of riluzole was 28 (2,800 mg). Although Kaplan-Meier analysis did not reveal a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.780), it showed that the prognosis of the beyond quartile 3 subgroup cDDD≥168 (16,800 mg) was significantly better than that of the other groups adjusted HR 0.488 (0.320-0.746), p=0.001.Conclusion: In China, older ALS patients and patients who had a higher BMI, shorter diagnostic delay, and higher FRS or FRS-R scores were more likely to use riluzole. Long-term use of riluzole was associated with a better prognosis for ALS patients, whereas short-term use had little effect on survival.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References25
25 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.