Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

The Demand for New Antibiotics: Antimicrobial Peptides, Nanoparticles, and Combinatorial Therapies as Future Strategies in Antibacterial Agent Design

Angel León-Buitimea, Cesar R. Garza-Cárdenas, Javier A. Garza-Cervantes and 2 more

Frontiers in Microbiology · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01669

Abstract

The inappropriate use of antibiotics and an inadequate control of infections have led to the emergence of resistant strains which represent a major threat to public health and the global economy. Therefore, research and development of a new generation of antimicrobials to mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance has become imperative. Current research and technology developments have promoted the improvement of antimicrobial agents that can selectively interact with a target site (e.g., a gene or a cellular process) or a specific pathogen. Antimicrobial peptides and metal nanoparticles exemplify a novel approach to treat infectious diseases. Nonetheless, combinatorial treatments have been recently considered as an excellent platform to design and develop the next generation of antibacterial agents. The combination of different drugs offers many advantages over their use as individual chemical moieties; these include a reduction in dosage of the individual drugs, fewer side effects compared to the monotherapy, reduced risk for the development of drug resistance, a better combined response compared to the effect of the individual drugs (synergistic effects), wide-spectrum antibacterial action, and the ability to attack simultaneously multiple target sites, in many occasions leading to an increased antibacterial effect. The selection of the appropriate combinatorial treatment is critical for the successful treatment of infections. Therefore, the design of combinatorial treatments provides a pathway to develop antimicrobial therapeutics with broad-spectrum antibacterial action, bactericidal instead of bacteriostatic mechanisms of action, and better efficacy against multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Development of antibacterial resistance is considered one of the leading public health problems, since it has a significant impact on the economy worldwide. Since therapeutic options to treat infections are increasingly being limited due to antibacterial resistance, this escalates the morbidity and mortality associated with infectious diseases caused by bacteria. ESKAPE pathogens are responsible for the majority of life-threatening nosocomial infections and are capable of “escaping” the biocidal action of antimicrobial agents. The term “ESKAPE” is an acronym for six bacterial pathogens associated with multidrug resistance: Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), and Enterobacter spp.. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are resistant to more than one antimicrobial drug, and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria are types of drug-resistant organisms that are resistant to all, or almost all, approved antimicrobial agents. For these reasons, it is essential to design and engineer new promising classes of antibiotics.

The New Therapeutic Alternatives: Input From Recent Studies

As we described above, the development of antimicrobial resistance represents a major threat to public health, and this has been echoed by different health organizations around the globe. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and nanoparticles (NPs) and the design of novel combinatorial therapies are among the new promising alternatives to fight infections caused by MDR- and XDR-resistant bacteria.

Antimicrobial Peptides

Antimicrobial peptides are a highly diverse family of small proteins with a varying number of amino acids; they have also been referred to as cationic host defense peptides. A variety of synthetic AMPs have been synthesized in the laboratories, but there are also a wide diversity of AMPs produced by bacteria and yeast, in addition to those found naturally in animals and plants. AMPs have demonstrated to participate in a variety of biological activities, including as antimicrobial antiviral, antifungal, and anti-mitogenic agents, in addition to their antitumor and anti-inflammatory properties and their ability to act as immune modulators. Therefore, AMPs represent a potential alternative to replace a wide variety of commonly used drugs. Moreover, most of the available studies demonstrate that AMPs exhibit therapeutic activity in in vitro and in vivo models.

The use of AMPs alone or in combination with conventional drugs has proven effective in combating different infectious agents, mainly MDR bacteria. AMPs are promising potential candidates to counteract multiresistant pathogens since they possess many advantages: they display potent microbicidal activity in the micromolar range, they have demonstrated a rapid bacterial death action, and they have low resistance selection. Their mechanism of antibacterial action is multifunctional because it alters the cell membrane and also attacks specific targets that take part in the development of different intracellular processes, such as inhibition of transcription, translation, protein synthesis, and bacterial cell wall formation. These general mechanisms of action of AMPs are displayed in Figure 1A.

One AMP of particular interest is human cathelicidin peptide (LL-37), which has been reported to have wound-healing effects on the host in addition to exhibiting antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative human pathogens. LL-37 and its derivatives are considered excellent candidates as antimicrobial therapeutic agents and have been the subject of many studies. Especially, in 2018, De Breij et al. synthesized an LL-37 derivative (SAAP-148), with potent antimicrobial activities, by replacing an amino acid from the terminal carbon of the LL-37 chain. This LL-37 derivative exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] between 0.4 and 12.8 μM against various ESKAPE pathogenic bacteria (e.g., E. faecium, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) without selection of resistance. Furthermore, this AMP derivative showed anti-biofilm activity against S. aureus, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa.

Colistin is another important peptide antibiotic (produced Bacillus polymyxa var. colistinus) used as a last-resort drug to treat MDR infections. It has emerged as an important agent in the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections, especially those caused by MDR pathogens in hospitalized patients. Notably, two new colistin-derived AMPs (AA139 and SET-M33), with a mechanism similar to colistin, are in development and have shown excellent therapeutic potential both in vitro against MDR bacteria and in in vivo infection models.

The main limiting factor for the systemic use of AMPs is their sensitivity to proteolytic digestion in different body fluids (e.g., intestinal mucosa, gastrointestinal tract, and blood plasma), which directly affect both their in vivo stability and their pharmacokinetic profile. Therefore, the search for new AMPs continues, particularly in a new class of peptides with high specificity and potency, known as “selectively targeted AMPs” (STAMPs), which show increased sensitivity to specific pathogens, demonstrating a significant increase in their bactericidal capacity without direct effects on the microbiota. The STAMP technology requires two functionally independent peptide domains integrated through a small linker. One peptide domain serves as the killing AMP moiety and the other peptide domain consisting of a high-affinity binding peptide which functions as a targeting moiety. These properties increase the binding to the surface of a targeted pathogen by enhancing the local concentration of the AMP and thus lead to improve bactericidal efficiency. In recent years, several new and promising STEMs have been developed against Streptococcus mutans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus mutants together, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and clinical isolates (Pseudomonas aeruginosa; ). Nonetheless, more preclinical and clinical research is needed in the development of targeted antimicrobial therapy.

Metal Nanoparticles

An additional alternative to fighting infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria is the development of NPs since it has been amply reported that metal nanoparticles (MNPs) have antibacterial activity against ESKAPE pathogens. Some of the mechanisms of the antimicrobial mode of action of MNPs are summarized in Figure 1B. In the search for new antimicrobials to treat the ESKAPE pathogens, silver has been highlighted as a potential candidate to treat infectious diseases. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) possess antimicrobial activity, and they act by disturbing cell membrane permeability, interacting with sulfur- and phosphorous-containing compounds including DNA, in addition to their ability to release silver ions, contributing to the antibacterial effect. Gold (Au) nanoparticles have also been reported as effective antibacterial agents for antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains such as S. aureus, E. faecium, Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecium), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae), Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium), and Salmonella dysenteriae (S. dysenteriae; ).

Among metal oxide nanoparticles, zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles have shown antimicrobial activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis), S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii. On the other hand, among photocatalytic nanoparticles, titanium dioxide (TiO2) NPs have been extensively studied due to their antimicrobial activity. Several studies have reported the antimicrobial activity of TiO2 NPs against methicillin-resistant S. aureus and MDR E. coli.

Despite the advantages that nanoparticles offer, such as a broad therapeutic index, controlled drug release, less prone to bacterial resistance, and fewer side effects than chemical antimicrobials, to treat infections caused by the ESKAPE pathogens, there are still challenges remaining to be tackled such as improvement of physicochemical properties, better pharmacokinetic profiles, and comprehensive studies on long-term exposure to humans. In terms of design and application, there is a particular interest in the generation of nanohybrids combining different metals with different antimicrobial and sensitizer agents. Metal nanoparticle-based compounds (alone or in combination with other antimicrobial agents) provide promising alternatives to combat the development of antibacterial resistance. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of action responsible for the bactericidal properties as well as the identification of the most promising antimicrobial agents for future clinical translation.

Combinatorial Treatments

The strategies to reduce antibiotic resistance include the limited use of antibiotics and the application of more effective antibacterial therapies. Because the time of exposure to antibiotics correlates with the development of resistance, it is necessary to use drugs with a broad spectrum of action and pharmacokinetic properties that facilitate their rapid access to the target site. However, most of the available treatments do not have all these characteristics, so an alternative option is the use of combination therapies, which can lead to a synergistic and more effective response. It has been shown that the combination of drugs leads to a considerably more potent effect, compared to the individual drug. Figure 2 displays the disadvantages of using single drugs (Figure 2A) and the advantages of using combinatorial treatments (Figure 2B).

Antimicrobial Peptide-Based Combinatorial Treatments

Combinations of AMPs with antibiotics have been reported to show synergistic effects in the treatment of bacterial infections. The mechanism of antibacterial action in these combinations involves the disruption of the outer membrane. Moreover, the use of AMPs in combinatorial treatments has certain advantages over their use as a single treatment since it has been observed that in combinatorial treatments, AMPs work as enhancers of the antimicrobial effects. This characteristic allows the reduction of their dose, and it also unlocks the bactericidal application of molecules with low molecular weight, which typically do not exhibit antimicrobial properties.

Recent studies have demonstrated the synergistic activity of antibiotics combined with AMPs. reported the synergism and other drug interactions between melittin, a cationic amphipathic peptide, and antibiotics such as doripenem, doxycycline, colistin, and ceftazidime, against MDR isolates of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. Likewise, combinatorial treatments of conventional antibiotics with new synthetic peptides inspired by human cationic peptides LL-37 and thrombocidin-1 (TC-1) have shown synergistic activity against S. aureus (antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity; ). In addition, the synergistic activity of 30 short AMPs combined with several conventional antibiotics such as beta-lactam antibiotics, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and quinolones was tested against an MDR P. aeruginosa isolate (PA910; ). Several combinations between peptides, polymyxin B, erythromycin, and tetracycline, as well as novel variants of indolicidin were found to be synergistic. Furthermore, the results showed that a single amino acid substitution within the peptides can have a powerful effect on the ability to synergize, which represents an opportunity to design treatment strategies based on synergistic interactions.

Metal Nanoparticle-Based Combinatorial Treatments

Metal nanoparticles should be considered as an attractive alternative to potentiate the antimicrobial effect of old and current antibiotics, since they have a high tendency to act synergistically when combined with a wide variety of antibiotics. This, in addition to the increased biocompatibility achieved by synthesizing them through green chemistry, allows considering the use of MNPs as adjuvant agents for the treatment of infectious diseases.

In the past years, there has been a marked increase in the use of biopolymers (e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, and polysaccharide) as capping agents to functionalize and stabilize MNPs. Exopolysaccharides are biocompatible and eco-friendly biomolecules; therefore, they can be used in the synthesis of MNPs. Recently, a silver-based nanobiocomposite was synthesized using an exopolysaccharide produced by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UANL-001L (EPS). The results showed an increased antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of this nanobiocomposite against pathogens of clinical relevance. Moreover, nanocomposites have been synthesized through green chemistry, such as zinc (Zn) and nickel (Ni) MNPs capped with EPS as capping agents, and they have displayed interesting antimicrobial properties as well. Ni-EPS nanoparticles exhibited both antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity against resistant MDR strains of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, Zn-EPS nanoparticles showed antimicrobial activity for treatments against MDR S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.

Among the most studied nanomaterials are silver nanoparticles due to their antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. They can be used in combinatorial treatments with currently used antibiotics for enhanced antimicrobial activity. Nonetheless, some other MNPs such as gold, copper, and zinc have been used in combination with a variety of antibiotic families to enhance bactericidal efficacy.

Some other interesting studies of silver-based nanomaterials have been reported. A novel silver-microfibrillated cellulose biocomposite has been synthesized, and its antimicrobial activity was determined against relevant clinical strains. The results showed that this biocomposite has antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria so that it could be applied in the development of biocompatible biomedical devices. Another promising approach toward the development of new antimicrobial combinatorial treatments is the use of transition metals, since they exhibit rapid and significant toxicity, at low concentrations, in different bacterial strains. Garza-Cervantes et al. evaluated the synergistic antimicrobial effects of silver/transition-metal combinatorial treatments. Their results showed combinatorial treatments that exhibited synergism (Ag–Zn, Ag–Co, Ag–Cd, Ag–Ni, and Ag–Cu) since their antimicrobial effects are increased up to 8-fold, compared to the effects observed for the treatments with the individual metals. Furthermore, Montelongo-Peralta et al. reported synergism between transition metals and antibiotics used to treat first-line drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis). Combinatorial treatments composed of isoniazid/silver exhibited a synergistic bactericidal effect in an isoniazid-resistant clinical strain of M. tuberculosis.

Moreover, a previous study showed the ability of silver to potentiate the activity of a broad range of antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria, as well as to restore antibiotic susceptibility (re-sensitizing) to a resistant bacterial strain. Recently, a group of researchers achieved to re-sensitize antibiotic-resistant E. coli using transition-metal micronutrients (Cu2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Cd2+, and Ni2+) combined with antibiotics (ampicillin and kanamycin). These combinatorial treatments showed a therapeutic activity and no toxicological effects in a murine topical infection model caused by antibiotic-resistant strains. The above data therefore strongly suggest that combination therapies are a potential strategy in the development of new treatments against infectious diseases.

The search for a new generation of antimicrobials to mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance is urgent. Current research and technology developments have promoted the improvement of antimicrobial agents that selectively target a target site (e.g., a gene, a cellular process, or a specific pathogen;; ). AMPs and MNPs exemplify a novel approach for treating infectious diseases. Nonetheless, the combinatorial treatments are considered as an excellent option for designing and developing next-generation antibacterial agents. As summary, Table 1 describes the mechanism of action, tested bacterial strains, advantages and disadvantages of AMPs, MNPs, and combinatorial treatments.

The selection of appropriate combinatorial treatment is critical for the successful prevention of infections. The most important challenges include (i) selection of agents with ideal physical–chemical properties (hydrosolubility and chemical stability in biological fluids; ), (ii) selection of antimicrobials that display appropriate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties, (iii) selection of biocompatible capping agents or biopolymer-based materials that enable drug release, and (iv) development of a process that ensures the stability and does not compromise the performance of the combination therapy formulation as a whole. Therefore, the design of combinatorial treatment provides a pathway to develop antimicrobial therapeutics with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, bactericidal instead of bacteriostatic mechanism of action, and better efficacy against MDR bacteria.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, AL-B and JM-R. Writing-original draft preparation AL-B, CG-C, JG-C, JL-E, and JM-R. Graphic design, JL-E. Writing-review and editing, AL-B, CG-C, JG-C, and JM-R. Supervision, AL-B and JM-R. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 97

  1. 1.

    Akbari R. Hakemi-Vala M. Pashaie F. Bevalian P. Hashemi A. Bagheri K. P. (2019 ). Highly synergistic effects of melittin with conventional antibiotics against multidrug-resistant isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb. Drug Resist. 25 193–202.

    Not in our library10.1089/mdr.2018.0016

  2. 2.

    Al-Mawlawi Z. S. Obaid H. H. (2019 ). Antibacterial activity of synergistic effect of colicin and gold nanoparticles against klebsiella pneumonia. Indian J. Public Heal. Res. Dev. 10:1041

    Not in our library10.5958/0976-5506.2019.00198.0

  3. 3.

    Andersson D. I. Balaban N. Q. Baquero F. Courvalin P. Glaser P. Gophna U. (2020 ). Antibiotic resistance: turning evolutionary principles into clinical reality. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 43 341–361.

    Not in our library10.1093/femsre/fuaa001

  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Arya S. S. Sharma M. M. Das R. K. Rookes J. Cahill D. Lenka S. K. (2019 ). Vanillin mediated green synthesis and application of gold nanoparticles for reversal of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Heliyon 5:e02021.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02021

  6. 6.

    Bankier C. Matharu R. K. Cheong Y. K. Ren G. G. Cloutman-Green E. Ciric L. (2019 ). Synergistic antibacterial effects of metallic nanoparticle combinations. Sci. Rep. 9:16074.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-52473-2

  7. 7.

    Banoee M. Seif S. Nazari Z. E. Jafari-Fesharaki P. Shahverdi H. R. Moballegh A. (2010 ). ZnO nanoparticles enhanced antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 93 557–561.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.b.31615

  8. 8.

    Bayramov D. F. Neff J. A. (2017 ). Beyond conventional antibiotics — New directions for combination products to combat biofilm. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 112 48–60.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2016.07.010

  9. 9.

    Bhande R. M. Khobragade C. N. Mane R. S. Bhande S. (2013 ). Enhanced synergism of antibiotics with zinc oxide nanoparticles against extended spectrum β-lactamase producers implicated in urinary tract infections. J. Nanoparticle Res. 15:1413

    Not in our library10.1007/s11051-012-1413-4

  10. 10.

    Boparai J. K. Sharma P. K. (2019 ). Mini review on antimicrobial peptides, sources, mechanism and recent applications. Protein Pept. Lett. 26 4–16.

    Not in our library10.2174/0929866526666190822165812

  11. 11.

    Borthagaray G. Mondelli M. Facchin G. Torre M. H. (2018 ). “Silver-containing nanoparticles in the research of new antimicrobial agents against ESKAPE pathogens,” in Inorganic Frameworks as Smart Nanomedicines, ed. Grumezescu A. M. (Norwich, NY: William Andrew), 317–386.

    Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-813661-4.00008-0

  12. 12.

    Campoccia D. Montanaro L. Arciola C. R. (2013 ). A review of the biomaterials technologies for infection-resistant surfaces. Biomaterials 34 8533–8554.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.089

  13. 13.

    Cassone M. Otvos L. (2010 ). Synergy among antibacterial peptides and between peptides and small-molecule antibiotics. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 8 703–716.

    Not in our library10.1586/eri.10.38

  14. 14.

    Chung P. Y. Khanum R. (2017 ). Antimicrobial peptides as potential anti-biofilm agents against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 50 405–410.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmii.2016.12.005

  15. 15.

    Das P. Sengupta K. Goel G. Bhattacharya S. (2017 ). Colistin: pharmacology, drug resistance and clinical applications. J. Acad. Clin. Microbiol. 19 77–85.

    Not in our library10.4103/jacm.jacm_31_17

  16. 16.

    De Breij A. Riool M. Cordfunke R. A. Malanovic N. De Boer L. Koning R. I. (2018 ). The antimicrobial peptide SAAP-148 combats drug-resistant bacteria and biofilms. Sci. Transl. Med. 10:eaan4044.

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.aan4044

  17. 17.

    de Dicastillo C. L. Patiño C. Galotto M. J. Vásquez-Martínez Y. Torrent C. Alburquenque D. (2019 ). Novel hollow titanium dioxide nanospheres with antimicrobial activity against resistant bacteria. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 10 1716–1725.

    Not in our library10.3762/bjnano.10.167

  18. 18.

    de la Fuente-Nunez C. Torres M. D. Mojica F. J. Lu T. K. (2017 ). Next-generation precision antimicrobials: towards personalized treatment of infectious diseases. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 37 95–102.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.014

  19. 19.

    Divyashree M. Mani M. K. Reddy D. Kumavath R. Ghosh P. Azevedo V. (2019 ). Clinical Applications of Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs): where do we stand now? Protein Pept. Lett. 27 120–134.

    Not in our library10.2174/0929866526666190925152957

  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    Dürr U. H. N. Sudheendra U. S. Ramamoorthy A. (2006 ). LL-37, the only human member of the cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1758 1408–1425.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.03.030

  22. 22.

    Ebejer J.-P. Charlton M. H. Finn P. W. (2016 ). Are the physicochemical properties of antibacterial compounds really different from other drugs? J. Cheminform. 8:30.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13321-016-0143-5

  23. 23.

    Eckert R. Brady K. M. Greenberg E. P. Qi F. Yarbrough D. K. He J. (2006 ). Enhancement of antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by coadministration of G10KHc and tobramycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50 3833–3838.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.00509-06

  24. 24.

    El-Sheekh M. M. El Kassas H. Y. (2014 ). Biosynthesis, characterization and synergistic effect of phytogenic gold nanoparticles by marine picoeukaryote Picochlorum sp. in combination with antimicrobials. Rend. Lincei. 25 513–521.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12210-014-0341-x

  25. 25.

    Escárcega-González C. E. Garza-Cervantes J. A. Vázquez-Rodríguez A. Morones-Ramírez J. R. (2018 ). Bacterial exopolysaccharides as reducing and/or stabilizing agents during synthesis of metal nanoparticles with biomedical applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2018 1–15.

    Not in our library10.1155/2018/7045852

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Garza-Cervantes J. A. Chávez-Reyes A. Castillo E. C. García-Rivas G. Ortega-Rivera O. A. Salinas E. (2017 ). Synergistic antimicrobial effects of silver/transition-metal combinatorial treatments. Sci. Rep. 7 1–16.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-01017-7

  28. 28.

    Garza-Cervantes J. A. Escárcega-González C. E. Barriga Castro E. D. Mendiola-Garza G. Marichal-Cancino B. A. López-Vázquez M. A. (2019 ). Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of biopolymer-Ni, Zn nanoparticle biocomposites synthesized using R. mucilaginosa UANL-001L exopolysaccharide as a capping agent. Int. J. Nanomed. 14 2557–2571.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s196470

  29. 29.

    Garza-Cervantes J. A. Mendiola-Garza G. de Melo E. M. Dugmore T. I. J. Matharu A. S. Morones-Ramirez J. R. (2020a ). Antimicrobial activity of a silver-microfibrillated cellulose biocomposite against susceptible and resistant bacteria. Sci. Rep. 10:7281.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-64127-9

  30. 30.
  31. 31.

    Gelover S. Gómez L. A. Reyes K. Teresa Leal M. (2006 ). A practical demonstration of water disinfection using TiO2 films and sunlight. Water Res. 40 3274–3280.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.watres.2006.07.006

  32. 32.

    Guo B. L. Han P. Guo L. C. Cao Y. Q. Li A. D. Kong J. Z. (2015 ). The antibacterial activity of Ta-doped ZnO nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 10:336.

    Not in our library10.1186/s11671-015-1047-4

  33. 33.

    Gurjar M. Azim A. Baronia A. Ahmed A. (2014 ). Current concepts in combination antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. 18 310–314.

    Not in our library10.4103/0972-5229.132495

  34. 34.

    He J. Anderson M. H. Shi W. Eckert R. (2009 ). Design and activity of a ‘dual-targeted’ antimicrobial peptide. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 33 532–537.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.11.013

  35. 35.

    Huo L. Huang X. Ling J. Liu H. Liu J. (2017 ). Selective activities of STAMPs against Streptococcus mutans. Exp. Ther. Med. 15 1886–1893.

    Not in our library10.3892/etm.2017.5631

  36. 36.

    Jackson N. Czaplewski L. Piddock L. J. V. (2018 ). Discovery and development of new antibacterial drugs: learning from experience? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 73 1452–1459.

    Not in our library10.1093/jac/dky019

  37. 37.

    Jesline A. John N. P. Narayanan P. M. Vani C. Murugan S. (2015 ). Antimicrobial activity of zinc and titanium dioxide nanoparticles against biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Nanosci. 5 157–162.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13204-014-0301-x

  38. 38.

    Kalita S. Kandimalla R. Sharma K. K. Kataki A. C. Deka M. Kotoky J. (2016 ). Amoxicillin functionalized gold nanoparticles reverts MRSA resistance. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 61 720–727.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.078

  39. 39.

    Khurana C. Sharma P. Pandey O. P. Chudasama B. (2016 ). Synergistic effect of metal nanoparticles on the antimicrobial activities of antibiotics against biorecycling microbes. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32 524–532.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmst.2016.02.004

  40. 40.

    Koppen B. C. Mulder P. P. G. de Boer L. Riool M. Drijfhout J. W. Zaat S. A. J. (2019 ). Synergistic microbicidal effect of cationic antimicrobial peptides and teicoplanin against planktonic and biofilm-encased Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 53 143–151.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.10.002

  41. 41.

    Kora A. J. Rastogi L. (2013 ). Enhancement of antibacterial activity of capped silver nanoparticles in combination with antibiotics, on model gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2013:871097.

    Not in our library10.1155/2013/871097

  42. 42.
  43. 43.

    Krause K. M. Serio A. W. Kane T. R. Connolly L. E. (2016 ). Aminoglycosides: an Overview. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6:a027029.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a027029

  44. 44.

    Kumar R. Shukla S. K. Pandey M. Pandey A. Pathak A. Dikshit A. (2016 ). Synthesis and antimicrobial effects of colloidal gold nanoparticles against prevalent waterborne bacterial pathogens. Cogent Chem. 2:1192522

    Not in our library10.1080/23312009.2016.1192522

  45. 45.

    Le C. F. Fang C. M. Sekaran S. D. (2017 ). Intracellular targeting mechanisms by antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61:e02340-16.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.02340-16

  46. 46.

    Lee B. Lee D. G. (2019 ). Synergistic antibacterial activity of gold nanoparticles caused by apoptosis-like death. J. Appl. Microbiol. 127 701–712.

    Not in our library10.1111/jam.14357

  47. 47.
  48. 48.

    Lehár J. Krueger A. S. Avery W. Heilbut A. M. Johansen L. M. Price E. R. (2009 ). Synergistic drug combinations tend to improve therapeutically relevant selectivity. Nat. Biotechnol. 27 659–666.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1549

  49. 49.

    Lei J. Sun L. Huang S. Zhu C. Li P. He J. (2019 ). The antimicrobial peptides and their potential clinical applications. Am. J. Transl. Res. 11 3919–3931.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.
  51. 51.

    Lopez-Carrizales M. Velasco K. I. Castillo C. Flores A. Magaña M. Martinez-Castanon G. A. (2018 ). In vitro synergism of silver nanoparticles with antibiotics as an alternative treatment in multiresistant uropathogens. Antibiotics 7:50.

    Not in our library10.3390/antibiotics7020050

  52. 52.

    Magiorakos A. P. Srinivasan A. Carey R. B. Carmeli Y. Falagas M. E. Giske C. G. (2012 ). Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18 268–281.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x

  53. 53.
  54. 54.
  55. 55.

    Mao R. Teng D. Wang X. Xi D. Zhang Y. Hu X. (2013 ). Design, expression, and characterization of a novel targeted plectasin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97 3991–4002.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-012-4508-z

  56. 56.
  57. 57.

    Moncla B. J. Pryke K. Rohan L. C. Graebing P. W. (2011 ). Degradation of naturally occurring and engineered antimicrobial peptides by proteases. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 02 404–408.

    Not in our library10.4236/abb.2011.26059

  58. 58.

    Montelongo-Peralta L. Z. León-Buitimea A. Palma-Nicolás J. P. Gonzalez-Christen J. Morones-Ramírez J. R. (2019 ). Antibacterial Activity of combinatorial treatments composed of transition-metal/antibiotics against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci. Rep. 9:5471.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-42049-5

  59. 59.

    Morones J. R. Luis Elechiguerra J. Camacho A. Holt K. Kouri J. B. Tapia Ramírez J. (2005 ). The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Inst. Phys. Publ. Nanotechnol. Nanotechnol. 16 2346–2353.

    Not in our library10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059

  60. 60.

    Morones-Ramirez J. R. Winkler J. A. Spina C. S. Collins J. J. (2013 ). Silver enhances antibiotic activity against gram-negative bacteria. Sci. Transl. Med. 5:190ra81.

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3006276

  61. 61.
  62. 62.

    Murugan S. (2018 ). Investigation of the synergistic antibacterial action of copper nanoparticles on certain antibiotics against human pathogens. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 10 83–86.

    Not in our library10.22159/ijpps.2018v10i10.28069

  63. 63.

    Mwangi J. Hao X. Lai R. Zhang Z. (2019 ). Antimicrobial peptides: new hope in the war against multidrug resistance. Zool. Res. 40 488–505.

    Not in our library10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2019.062

  64. 64.

    Naqvi S. Z. H. Kiran U. Ali M. I. Jamal A. Hameed A. Ahmed S. (2013 ). Combined efficacy of biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles and different antibiotics against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Int. J. Nanomed. 8 3187–3195.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s49284

  65. 65.

    Nishanthi R. Malathi S. John P. S. Palani P. (2019 ). Green synthesis and characterization of bioinspired silver, gold and platinum nanoparticles and evaluation of their synergistic antibacterial activity after combining with different classes of antibiotics. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 96 693–707.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.050

  66. 66.

    Oka H. Ito Y. (2000 ). “ANTIBIOTICS | High-Speed Countercurrent Chromatography,” in Encyclopedia of Separation Science, eds Adlard E. R. I Wilson D. Poole C. F. Cooke M. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 2058–2067.

    Not in our library10.1016/b0-12-226770-2/03311-1

  67. 67.

    Panácek A. Smékalová M. Kilianová M. Prucek R. Bogdanová K. Věcěrová R. (2016 ). Strong and nonspecific synergistic antibacterial efficiency of antibiotics combined with silver nanoparticles at very low concentrations showing no cytotoxic effect. Molecules 21:26.

    Not in our library10.3390/molecules21010026

  68. 68.

    Pemovska T. Bigenzahn J. W. Superti-Furga G. (2018 ). Recent advances in combinatorial drug screening and synergy scoring. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 42 102–110.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coph.2018.07.008

  69. 69.

    Pendleton J. N. Gorman S. P. Gilmore B. F. (2013 ). Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 11 297–308.

    Not in our library10.1586/eri.13.12

  70. 70.

    Perveen S. Safdar N. Chaudhry G. E. Yasmin A. (2018 ). Antibacterial evaluation of silver nanoparticles synthesized from lychee peel: individual versus antibiotic conjugated effects. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34:118.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11274-018-2500-1

  71. 71.

    Pirrone V. Thakkar N. Jacobson J. M. Wigdahl B. Krebs F. C. (2011 ). Combinatorial approaches to the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55 1831–1842.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.00976-10

  72. 72.

    Preston S. L. (2004 ). The importance of appropriate antimicrobial dosing: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. Ann. Pharmacother. 38(9 Suppl.), S14–S18.

    Not in our library10.1345/aph.1e218

  73. 73.

    Rout G. K. Shin H.-S. Gouda S. Sahoo S. Das G. Fraceto L. F. (2018 ). Current advances in nanocarriers for biomedical research and their applications. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 46 1053–1062.

    Not in our library10.1080/21691401.2018.1478843

  74. 74.

    Ruden S. Rieder A. Chis Ster I. Schwartz T. Mikut R. Hilpert K. (2019 ). Synergy pattern of short cationic antimicrobial peptides against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 10:2740.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2019.02740

  75. 75.

    Sarma P. Mahendiratta S. Prakash A. Medhi B. (2018 ). Specifically targeted antimicrobial peptides: a new and promising avenue in selective antimicrobial therapy. Indian J. Pharmacol. 50:1

    Not in our library10.4103/ijp.ijp_218_18

  76. 76.

    Selvaraj R. C. A. Rajendran M. Nagaiah H. P. (2019 ). Re-potentiation of β-lactam antibiotic by synergistic combination with biogenic copper oxide nanocubes against biofilm forming multidrug-resistant bacteria. Molecules 24:3055.

    Not in our library10.3390/molecules24173055

  77. 77.

    Shahverdi A. R. Fakhimi A. Shahverdi H. R. Minaian S. (2007 ). Synthesis and effect of silver nanoparticles on the antibacterial activity of different antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 3 168–171.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nano.2007.02.001

  78. 78.
  79. 79.

    Sharma D. Kanchi S. Bisetty K. (2019 ). Biogenic synthesis of nanoparticles: a review. Arab. J. Chem. 12 3576–3600.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.11.002

  80. 80.

    Si Z. Lim H. W. Tay M. Y. F. Du Y. Ruan L. Qiu H. (2020 ). A glycosylated cationic block poly(beta-peptide) reverses intrinsic antibiotic resistance in all ESKAPE Gram-negative bacteria. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 59 6819–6826.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201914304

  81. 81.

    Singh R. Wagh P. Wadhwani S. Gaidhani S. Kumbhar A. Bellare J. (2013 ). Synthesis, optimization, and characterization of silver nanoparticles from Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and their enhanced antibacterial activity when combined with antibiotics. Int. J. Nanomed. 8 4277–4290.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s48913

  82. 82.

    Starr C. G. Wimley W. C. (2017 ). Antimicrobial peptides are degraded by the cytosolic proteases of human erythrocytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1859 2319–2326.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.09.008

  83. 83.

    Tamma P. D. Cosgrove S. E. Maragakis L. L. (2012 ). Combination therapy for treatment of infections with gram-negative bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 25 450–470.

    Not in our library10.1128/cmr.05041-11

  84. 84.
  85. 85.

    van der Weide H. Vermeulen-de Jongh D. M. C. van der Meijden A. Boers S. A. Kreft D. ten Kate M. T. (2019 ). Antimicrobial activity of two novel antimicrobial peptides AA139 and SET-M33 against clinically and genotypically diverse Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with differing antibiotic resistance profiles. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 54 159–166.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.019

  86. 86.
  87. 87.

    Vazquez-Rodriguez A. Vasto-Anzaldo X. Leon-Buitimea A. Zarate X. Morones-Ramirez J. R. (2020 ). Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles coated with exopolysaccharides obtained from Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience 19 498–503.

    Not in our library10.1109/tnb.2020.2985101

  88. 88.
  89. 89.

    Wang L. Hu C. Shao L. (2017 ). The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int. J. Nanomedicine 12 1227–1249.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s121956

  90. 90.

    World Health Organization (WHO) (2020 ). Antibiotic Resistance. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance (accessed January 13, 2020).

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    Wolfram J. Zhu M. Yang Y. Shen J. Gentile E. Paolino D. (2015 ). Safety of nanoparticles in medicine. Curr. Drug Targets 16 1671–1681.

    Not in our library10.2174/1389450115666140804124808

  92. 92.

    Woźniak-Budych M. J. Przysiecka Ł Langer K. Pepliñska B. Jarek M. Wiesner M. (2017 ). Green synthesis of rifampicin-loaded copper nanoparticles with enhanced antimicrobial activity. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 28:42.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10856-017-5857-z

  93. 93.

    Wu P. Grainger D. W. (2006 ). Drug/device combinations for local drug therapies and infection prophylaxis. Biomaterials 27 2450–2467.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.031

  94. 94.

    Xu L. Shao C. Li G. Shan A. Chou S. Wang J. (2020 ). Conversion of broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides into species-specific antimicrobials capable of precisely targeting pathogenic bacteria. Sci. Rep. 10:944.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-58014-6

  95. 95.

    Yang P. Pageni P. Rahman M. A. Bam M. Zhu T. Chen Y. P. (2019 ). Gold nanoparticles with antibiotic-metallopolymers toward broad-spectrum antibacterial effects. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8:e1800854.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.201800854

  96. 96.

    Zhang Y. Bai Y. Jia J. Gao N. Li Y. Zhang R. (2014 ). Perturbation of physiological systems by nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 3762–3809.

    Not in our library10.1039/c3cs60338e

  97. 97.

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.