Point Deletion or Insertion in CmeR-Box, A2075G Substitution in 23S rRNA, and Presence of erm(B) Are Key Factors of Erythromycin Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolated From Central China
Yiluo Cheng, Wenting Zhang, Qin Lu and 5 more
Frontiers in Microbiology · 2020
doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00203 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are major food-borne pathogens that cause bacterial gastroenteritis in humans, and poultry is considered as their most important reservoir. Macrolides, such as erythromycin, are the first-line choice for treatment of campylobacteriosis. In this study, of the 143 Campylobacter isolates recovered from poultry in central China during 2015–2017, 25.2% were erythromycin resistant. A2075G substitution in 23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and ribosomal methylase encoded by erm(B) were found in 4.2 and 4.9% isolates, respectively, and correlated with erythromycin resistance. The polymorphisms of CmeR-Box were also analyzed in our isolates. Among them, 9.1% isolates harbored a point deletion or insertion within the CmeR-Box, and we first showed that point deletion or insertion, but not substitution, in CmeR-Box led to high expression of cmeABC, which was significantly associated with erythromycin resistance (p < 0.05). These results suggest that point deletion or insertion in CmeR-Box, A2075G substitution in 23S rRNA, and presence of erm(B) are three main factors to erythromycin resistance in C. jejuni and C. coli.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.