Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Clostridium difficile – From Colonization to Infection

Holger Schäffler, Anne Breitrück

Frontiers in Microbiology · 2018 · Review

doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00646

Abstract

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is the most frequent cause of nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The incidence of C. difficile infection (CDI) has been rising worldwide with subsequent increases in morbidity, mortality and health care costs. Asymptomatic colonization with C. difficile is common and a high prevalence has been found in specific cohorts, e.g. hospitalized patients, adults in nursing homes and in infants. However, the risk of infection with C. difficile differs significantly between these cohorts. While CDI is a clear indication for therapy, colonization with C. difficile is not believed to be a direct precursor for CDI and therefore does not require treatment. Antibiotic therapy causes alterations of the intestinal microbial composition, enabling C. difficile colonization and consecutive toxin production leading to disruption of the colonic epithelial cells. Clinical symptoms of CDI range from mild diarrhea to potentially life-threatening conditions like pseudomembranous colitis or toxic megacolon. While antibiotics are the still the treatment of choice for CDI, new therapies have emerged in recent years such as antibodies against C. difficile toxin B and fecal microbial transfer (FMT). This specific therapy for CDI underscores the role of the indigenous bacterial composition in the prevention of the disease in healthy individuals and its role in the pathogenesis after alteration by antibiotic treatment. In addition to the pathogenesis of CDI, this review focuses on the colonization of C. difficile in the human gut and factors promoting CDI.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Clostridium difficile was first described as part of the intestinal bacterial composition in newborns in 1935. In the 1970s, C. difficile was identified as the causative agent for pseudomembranous colitis following antibiotic therapy. The pathogenic potential of this strain was proven to fulfill the Koch’s postulates underscoring its role in the development of CDI. Recently, a dramatic increase in the incidence as well as in the mortality of CDI could be observed worldwide.

The clinical spectrum of C. difficile ranges from asymptomatic colonization, mild and self-limiting disease to a severe, life-threatening pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, sepsis and death. CDI is defined when there is the presence of symptomatic diarrhea defined by three or more unformed stools per 24 h and at least one of the following criteria: a positive laboratory assay for C. difficile toxin A and/or B or toxin-producing C. difficile organism in a stool sample or pseudomembranous colitis or colonic histopathology characteristics of CDI revealed by endoscopy. CDI is associated with an increased abundance of toxin-producing C. difficile strains, leading to high toxin concentrations within the colon resulting in inflammation and damage of the colonocytes. Usually, the indigenous microbial communities provide a colonization resistance to C. difficile, which could also be proven in animal models. However, a disruption of this microbial system can promote the development of CDI.

While the clinical presentation of CDI is distinctive, C. difficile colonization without any symptoms, defined as asymptomatic colonization is common, especially in neonates. This review focuses on the role of C. difficile in asymptomatic colonization and CDI to better understand which factors might contribute to the progression and also prevention of the disease.

Microbiology

C. difficile is a Gram-positive, anaerobic, spore-forming and toxin-producing bacillus, belonging to cluster XI the Clostridium genus and can be isolated from water, vegetables, hospital environment, and the intestines of humans and domesticated animals.

Different virulence factors are associated with the development of CDI. The most important virulence factor is the release of multiple toxins, namely large glycosylating exotoxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB). These toxins lead to the characteristic clinical symptoms by binding to C. difficile toxin receptors on intestinal epithelial cells. Another toxin can be found in some C. difficile strains, especially the PCR ribotype 027, named binary toxin or C. difficile transferase, which is associated with a higher mortality rate in patients. This ribotype 027 carries a deletion in tcdC, which is discussed to play a major role in its increased production of toxins. There are C. difficile strains which can synthesize C. difficile transferase in the absence of TcdA and TcdB. These toxins, which are encoded on the pathogenicity locus, are multi-domain toxins with glycosyltransferase activities, which transfer glycosyl residues to small Ras homologous GTPases and consecutively lead to a loss of the intestinal membrane integrity and to cell death. As a consequence, inflammation of the colon occurs with massive fluid loss into the large intestine, clinically presenting as acute diarrhea. While initially TcdA was suggested to play a more prominent role in the development of CDI compared to TcdB, this view was challenged by different other studies. Colonization with C. difficile occurs by oral ingestion of spores from infected individuals or the environment. While C. difficile is an anaerobic organism, C. difficile spores can survive in aerobic environments for months or years. C. difficile spores are resistant to the gastric acid and can germinate into vegetative cells in the anaerobic conditions of the colon.

Epidemiology of CDI

The worldwide incidence of CDI has been rising steadily since 2000, however, susceptibility to treatment decreased. C. difficile was first reported to cause severe antibiotic-associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis in the 1970s and has become the most common healthcare-associated infection, leading to about 500,000 cases and 29,000 deaths annually in the United States. Overall, the epidemiology data of CDI in Europe are more variable due to different reporting systems within the European Union. However, by extrapolation of the data from the United Kingdom to Europe, they result in a total number of 172,000 CDI cases annually within the European Union. The epidemic spread of hypervirulent C. difficile strains, e.g., PCR ribotype 027 leads to larger nosocomial outbreaks, which are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The economic impact of CDI is enormous, leading to additional medical costs of over one billion dollar per year in the United States and three billion euro per year within the European Union. Especially hospitalized patients and adults in long-term care facilities are at a higher risk of developing CDI. Additionally, in infants an increase of CDI was observed in the last decade. This is especially interesting since – as mentioned above – C. difficile is highly prevalent in infants, however, they usually do not show clinical signs of CDI. Nevertheless, the data regarding CDI in pediatric patients are limited.

Asymptomatic Colonization

While many studies have focused on the pathogenesis and the development of CDI, the role of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization and its progression to CDI is still not completely understood. While in the past literature the definition of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization is not uniform, were proposing one as followed: either detectable concentrations of C. difficile or its toxin and the absence of diarrhea without colonoscopic or histopathologic findings consistent with pseudomembranous colitis.

The prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization in adults varies in different population groups. In healthy adults, several studies have shown that 0–17.5% were colonized by C. difficile strains without clinical signs of CDI. The colonization rate of toxigenic strains ranges from 1 to 5% in the surveyed group. While the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization is relatively low in healthy adults, it can rise dramatically in individuals having contact with the health system. Elderly in long-term care facilities or nursing homes have an increased rate of colonization range from 0 to 51%. A high prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile can also be found in patients or health-care workers. Additionally, patients in rehabilitation centers have an increased rate of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. Furthermore, a high percentage of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization can be found in adult patients with underlying diseases, e.g., cystic fibrosis.

Risk factors for the development of the last asymptomatic C. difficile colonization are hospitalization within 12 months, use of corticosteroids, a previous history of CDI and antibodies against toxin B.

In contrast to adults, a high prevalence of C. difficile colonization without clinical signs of CDI can be observed in infants and neonates. Especially in the first 4 weeks of life, C. difficile colonization increases from 0% to an average of 37%, followed by a recovery, dropping to an average of 10% during the first year of life. Colonization rates comparable to the rates in healthy adults were observed in infants by the age of 2. Analysis of ribotypes revealed that pediatric patients harbor several toxigenic strains that circulate in adult patients.

Although – according to the definition – asymptomatic colonized individuals show no clinical signs of CDI, they can act as a reservoir of C. difficile and also may serve as potential disease carriers and might therefore transmit C. difficile to others. Furthermore, asymptomatic colonization with C. difficile is a crucial factor in the progression to CDI, as carriers of toxigenic strains are at a higher risk for the development of an infection compared to non-colonized patients.

In contrast to this, asymptomatic colonization could also induce the production of antibodies, which in turn protect their host against CDI with a humoral immune response. It was also proposed that asymptomatic C. difficile colonization might lead to the integration of C. difficile into the indigenous intestinal microbiota, serving as a protective factor for the development of CDI. This theory could also be proven in hamsters, where colonization with a non-toxigenic C. difficile strain before the application of a toxigenic C. difficile strain was able to prevent the development of CDI. However, further prospective studies to better understand the mechanisms how individuals develop asymptomatic C. difficile colonization and if this may act as risk or protective factor in the progression for an infection are needed.

From Colonization to Infection

A schematic overview which factors lead to the development of CDI is given in Figure 1.

The Indigenous Microbiota

The intestinal microbiota is a complex ecosystem consisting of over a thousand bacterial species reaching its highest concentration in the colon. In adults, a healthy intestinal microbiota is dominated by the phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes and shows a high diversity and richness. These commensal bacteria are essential for the host metabolism, nutrition function, maturation of the immune system and protection against pathogens. During human lifetime, different factors, such as the mode of delivery, diet, geography, antibiotic use and the development of gastrointestinal diseases can influence the composition of the intestinal microbiota. A disruption of this ecosystem, a so-called intestinal dysbiosis can have a significant influence on the structure and the function of the resident microbiota. Changes of the indigenous intestinal microbial composition result in a breakdown of the colonization resistance, which favors C. difficile germination, growth and spreading within the intestine.

It is well known that the susceptibility of CDI is strongly associated with a previous exposure to antibiotics. The application of antibiotics, especially broad-spectrum antibiotics, can have profound and long-lasting consequences on the host by altering the intestinal bacterial composition and the metabolome. The first description of CDI in the setting of antibiotic therapy was in 1974 in a patient after the application of clindamycin. Other antibiotics, especially cephalosporins, penicillin and fluoroquinolones have also been reported to be associated with the development of CDI. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that cumulative exposure to any kind of antibiotics increases the risk of developing CDI. The impact of antibiotic administration on the microbial composition in healthy adults has been studied extensively. summarized the effects of different antimicrobial agents on the bacterial diversity and single bacterial phylae, families and classes. The effects of antibiotics on the intestinal microbial composition can also be investigated in murine models, allowing the examination of factors which lead to the resistance of C. difficile colonization and subsequent development of CDI. Different studies described the intestinal microbial composition in patients with CDI and observed similar results regarding a reduced diversity and also reduced species richness. In contrast to healthy controls, patients with CDI showed an increase in Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla and a decrease in Bacteroidetes phylum. Furthermore, Ruminococcacea, Lachnospiraceae, Bacteriodaceae, Clostrida cluster IV and XIVa are decreased while an increased abundance of Enterococacea could be observed. Additionally, in a study by, ), co-colonization with potentially protective bacterial taxa, e.g., Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, Clostridium or Eubacterium may protect the development of CDI from asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. In a recent study by, Veillonella dispar was found as a candidate organism which might be protective for the recurrence of C. difficile.

Bile Acids

Germination of C. difficile spores is supported by changes in the composition of bile acids. A reduced number of bacteria, producing hydrolase enzymes, results in a reduction of secondary bile acids, which normally inhibit vegetative cell growth and a simultaneous increase of primary bile acids like cholate or taurocholic acid stimulates spore germination. While cholate and glycine can promote C. difficile spore formation, chenodeoxycholate was found to act as an inhibitor of spore formation. A depletion of commensals can also result in an oversupply of available nutrients, e.g., monosaccharides, which can further be utilized by C. difficile. In a murine model, administration of antibiotics led to a shift of the bile acid pool and therefore increased C. difficile spore germination.

Bacteriocins

Bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides with narrow or broad spectrum activity against other bacterial species. The secretion of bacteriocins from Bacillus, Lactococcus, and Enterococcus strains, whose antimicrobial function against C. difficile has been proven in vitro, is decreased in CDI.

C. Difficile Toxin A Receptor

The susceptibility of the host to CDI is also associated with the presence or absence of C. difficile toxin A receptor on the surface of intestinal epithelial cells. This fact was reinforced by the study of which compared the effect of toxin A in newborn compared to adult rabbit ileum. The absence of pathological effects in the newborn ileum may be due to a complete lack or only a low expression of C. difficile toxin A receptor and therefore might prevent neonates from the development a CDI.

Immunological Factors

It is well known that the host recognition of C. difficile and the subsequent innate and adaptive immune responses have a protective effect against the development of CDI. tested prospectively the immune response of the host via measuring IgG antibodies of TcdA and found that an acquired antibody response to C. difficile protected against CDI. However, the antibody response to C. difficile did not affect asymptomatic C. difficile colonization.

The protective effect of high IgA concentrations, which is a potent toxin A neutralizer has also been shown in breastfeed infants. The presence of maternal secretory IgA may prevent them from colonization, as this cohort was found to have lower recovery rates compared to formula-fed infants. However, beneath IgA also other components of breast milk have the potential to bind C. difficile toxin A.

Bacterial Factors

The development of CDI is closely linked to the bacterial virulence factors TcdA and TcdB and the binary toxin, as non-toxigenic C. difficile strains are not known to cause CDI. Colonization with hypervirulent ribotype NAP1 occurred more likely in CDI than in asymptomatic colonized individuals, due to an increased TcdA and TcdB production compared to other toxigenic ribotypes.

Extrinsic Risk Factors

Different studies indicate that – beneath host-mediated and pathogen-related factors – multiple extrinsic risk factors increase the development and also severity of CDI.

Antibiotics

As described above, the use of antibiotics is the most-common risk factor in the development of CDI. Antibiotics have dramatic effects on the bacterial ecosystem of the gut, which can last for a long period of time. Especially fluoroquinolones and particularly cephalosporins and clindamycin are associated with an increased frequency of CDI.

Proton Pump Inhibitors

Another important risk factor for the development of CDI is the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). While the normal gastric acidity provides a protective host defense, an increase of the gastric pH may prevent the gastric content from an elimination of the ingested C. difficile spores. However, the role of PPIs in the development of CDI is still controversial, since other studies could not prove an association between the gastric acid suppression and an increased risk for the development of CDI. Since the use of PPIs is increasing globally, further prospective studies are needed in order to address the possible association with these drugs and the development of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization or CDI.

Health Care Facilities

In hospitals or long-term care facilities, an increased exposure to C. difficile can be found due to high C. difficile contamination on surfaces, medical devices and health care personal or infected roommates. Furthermore, a high rate of polypharmacy like antibiotics and underlying co-morbidities such as malignancy or inflammatory bowel disease are closely associated with patients in health care facilities. To decrease the C. difficile transmission and infection rate in hospitals and long-term care facilities, a screening of new patients could be an option to identify toxigenic strain carriers and isolate them from other patients. These approach was able to significantly decrease the incidence of hospital acquired CDI in a prospective Canadian study cohort.

Age

Clostridium difficile is more common in advanced age, also showing a more severe outcome in this population. There are several possible mechanisms for this phenomenon. First, an inadequate innate or humoral immune response might lead to a higher incidence and also severity of CDI. Secondarily, the higher prevalence of CDI in the elderly could also be associated with the change of the intestinal microbial composition, e.g., loss of bacterial diversity during aging, which might promote C. difficile colonization. Additionally, the presence of chronic disorders and an increase in the infection rate, requiring polypharmacy, including antibiotics, is generally much higher in this age cohort.

C. difficile in Food

While the transmission of C. difficile from humans to humans is well-established, C. difficile as a foodborne disease still remains a matter of debate. In different studies, C. difficile was found in retail meat. Additionally, C. difficile was also detected in water, vegetables, pets and also piglets. Regular exposure to C. difficile in the food might lead to asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. However, since community-acquired C. difficile is relatively uncommon, it is not clear if the ingestion of C. difficile via the oral route also leads to consecutive CDI. Further studies will be needed in order to address this issue.

Conventional

The mainstay in the treatment of CDI is – beneath the withdrawal of antibiotics fostering CDI – the initiation of an antibiotic therapy, e.g., vancomycin or metronidazole. Recent advances in the therapy of C. difficile and the role of antibiotic resistance in CDI are summarized elsewhere. However, therapy of recurrent CDI can be challenging with conventional antibiotic therapy. Recurrence of CDI is found in 20–30% of the patients with a high mortality rate in this cohort. Fidaxomicin, approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for CDI treatment, shows reduced recurrence rates in patients with C. difficile, however, not in the highly virulent strains B1/NAP1/027. In a recent study, the use of bezlotoxumab, a human monoclonal antibody against TcdB, was associated with a lower rate of C. difficile recurrent infection compared to placebo. The addition of an antibody against TcdA (actoxumab) had no effect on the disease recurrence alone or in combination with bezlotoxumab, which is also underscoring the crucial role of toxin B in the pathogenesis of CDI. A matter of debate for this new approach is the potential combination with fecal microbial transplantation (FMT). Further studies will be needed in order to redefine the treatment algorithm of CDI with bezlotoxumab.

Microbiota-Targeted Therapy

The intestinal microbial communities of patients with CDI differ from patients with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. In different studies, the administration of single strain probiotics showed only limited success in the treatment of CDI. The role of probiotics in the prevention of CDI is still discussed controversial. In contrast to this, the probiotic treatment with three strains from Lactobacillus parallel to antibiotic application in hospitalized adults showed a significantly decreased CDI rate from 18.0 to 2.3 cases per 10,000 patients-days during the 10-year observation period. The most direct and effective way in changing the patient’s intestinal bacterial composition is via FMT. FMT is highly effective in the treatment of antibiotic-refractory CDI and recently was also shown to be cost effective. FMT involves installation of stool from a healthy donor into a patient, leading to a shift of the intestinal microbial communities. Despite the high effectiveness of FMT in the treatment of recurrent CDI, the long-term effects of this therapeutic approach are still not known and might lead to an increased risk of other diseases. Furthermore, FMT is still a highly diverse biological product with several challenges in the standardization of protocols. Another therapeutic approach is the administration of non-toxigenic C. difficile strains or a mixture of spore-forming commensals. In two phase II clinical trials testing both treatments, a significant decrease of CDI recurrence was observed. However, in another study it was observed that non-toxigenic strains had the capacity to change their phenotype to toxigenic C. difficile strains. Therefore, non-toxigenic strains can also be a predisposition in the development of CDI and have to be used with caution in the setting of C. difficile prevention.

Conclusion

The incidence of CDI increased dramatically in the last years. While asymptomatic C. difficile colonization is common especially in newborns, the progression from asymptomatic colonization to infection is not completely understood and large, prospective studies are lacking. While many studies in adults and infants showed high C. difficile colonization rates with toxigenic as well as non-toxigenic strains, the detection of C. difficile or its toxins in feces of individuals does not immediately implicate an infection with this pathogen and therefore treatment is only indicated when there are clinical signs of CDI. Although persons with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization are potential disease carriers and therefore predispose a risk factor for themselves and other people, based on current information an eradication of C. difficile is not indicated. CDI is strongly associated with host-mediated factors, including the indigenous microbiota, bacteriocins, toxin A receptor and immunological factors as well as pathogen-related factors, including TcdA, TcdB, and binary toxin. However, host-mediated factors are discussed to have a more pronounced role in the development of CDI. Especially a disruption of the indigenous intestinal microbial composition within the host can promote the development of CDI via germination and proliferation of toxigenic C. difficile strains. Furthermore, several external factors like age, polypharmacy or underlying medical conditions increase the risk and severity of CDI. Due to the strong association between CDI and antibiotic exposure, therapeutic approaches that target the modulation of the intestinal bacterial composition like FMT are crucial in this clinical setting. Treatment strategies with non-toxigenic C. difficile strains are on their way, however, a change of non-toxigenic to toxigenic C. difficile strains can occur, making this therapeutic approach challenging.

The role of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization in the development of CDI is still a controversial matter of debate. Further studies elucidating the clinical consequences of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization are needed to further investigate if the presence of C. difficile without any signs of CDI is beneficial or might potentially be harmful. We conclude that mechanisms that enable the progression from asymptomatic C. difficile colonization to CDI are closely associated with host-mediated as well as pathogen-related factors and a combination of both might be of outstanding interest in the pathogenesis and also prevention of CDI.

Author’s Note

Due to a limitation of words no citation of all primary literature was possible, the authors kindly ask to excuse this circumstance.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 208

  1. 1.

    Akhtar A. J. Shaheen M. (2007 ). Increasing incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in African-American and Hispanic patients: association with the use of proton pump inhibitor therapy. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 99 500–504.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    al Saif N. Brazier J. S. (1996 ). The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales. J. Med. Microbiol. 45 133–137.

    Not in our library10.1099/00222615-45-2-133

  3. 3.

    Alasmari F. Seiler S. M. Hink T. Burnham C.-A. D. Dubberke E. R. (2014 ). Prevalence and risk factors for asymptomatic Clostridium difficile carriage. Clin. Infect. Dis. 59 216–222.

    Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciu258

  4. 4.

    Ananthakrishnan A. N. (2011 ). Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, risk factors and management. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8 17–26.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrgastro.2010.190

  5. 5.

    Antharam V. C. Li E. C. Ishmael A. Sharma A. Mai V. Rand K. H. (2013 ). Intestinal dysbiosis and depletion of butyrogenic bacteria in Clostridium difficile infection and nosocomial diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51 2884–2892.

    Not in our library10.1128/jcm.00845-13

  6. 6.

    Antonopoulos D. A. Huse S. M. Morrison H. G. Schmidt T. M. Sogin M. L. Young V. B. (2009 ). Reproducible community dynamics of the gastrointestinal microbiota following antibiotic perturbation. Infect. Immun. 77 2367–2375.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.01520-08

  7. 7.

    Antunes L. C. M. Finlay B. B. (2011 ). A comparative analysis of the effect of antibiotic treatment and enteric infection on intestinal homeostasis. Gut Microbes 2 105–108.

    Not in our library10.4161/gmic.2.2.15610

  8. 8.

    Arbel L. T. Hsu E. McNally K. (2017 ). Cost-effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a literature review. Cureus 9:e1599.

    Not in our library10.7759/cureus.1599

  9. 9.

    Aronsson B. Möllby R. Nord C. E. (1985 ). Antimicrobial agents and Clostridium difficile in acute enteric disease: epidemiological data from Sweden, 1980-1982. J. Infect. Dis. 151 476–481.

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/151.3.476

  10. 10.

    Arvand M. Moser V. Schwehn C. Bettge-Weller G. Hensgens M. P. Kuijper E. J. (2012 ). High prevalence of Clostridium difficile colonization among nursing home residents in Hesse, Germany. PLoS One 7:e30183.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0030183

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Bacon A. E. Fekety R. Schaberg D. R. Faix R. G. (1988 ). Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile colonization in newborns: results using a bacteriophage and bacteriocin typing system. J. Infect. Dis. 158 349–354.

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/158.2.349

  13. 13.

    Bagdasarian N. Rao K. Malani P. N. (2015 ). Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review. JAMA 313 398–408.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2014.17103

  14. 14.

    Bakri M. M. Brown D. J. Butcher J. P. Sutherland A. D. (2009 ). Clostridium difficile in ready-to-eat salads, Scotland. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15 817–818.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1505.081186

  15. 15.

    Barbut F. Cornely O. A. Fitzpatrick F. Kuijper E. J. Nagy E. Rupnik M. (2013 ). Clostridium difficile Infection in Europe: A CDI Europe Report. Available at: http://www.multivu.com/assets/60637/documents/60637-CDI-HCP-Report-original.pdf [accessed March 05 2018].

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Bartlett J. G. (2006 ). Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 145 758–764.

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00008

  17. 17.

    Bartlett J. G. (2010 ). Clostridium difficile: progress and challenges. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1213 62–69.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05863.x

  18. 18.

    Bartlett J. G. Chang T. W. Onderdonk A. B. (1978 ). Comparison of five regimens for treatment of experimental clindamycin-associated colitis. J. Infect. Dis. 138 81–86.

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/138.1.81

  19. 19.

    Bartlett J. G. Onderdonk A. B. Cisneros R. L. Kasper D. L. (1977 ). Clindamycin-associated colitis due to a toxin-producing species of Clostridium in hamsters. J. Infect. Dis. 136 701–705.

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/136.5.701

  20. 20.

    Bartoloni A. Mantella A. Goldstein B. P. Dei R. Benedetti M. Sbaragli S. (2004 ). In-vitro activity of nisin against clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile. J. Chemother. 16 119–121.

    Not in our library10.1179/joc.2004.16.2.119

  21. 21.

    Bauer M. P. Farid A. Bakker M. Hoek R. A. S. Kuijper E. J. van Dissel J. T. (2014 ). Patients with cystic fibrosis have a high carriage rate of non-toxigenic Clostridium difficile. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20 O446–O449.

    Not in our library10.1111/1469-0691.12439

  22. 22.

    Bauer M. P. Notermans D. W. van Benthem B. H. B. Brazier J. S. Wilcox M. H. Rupnik M. (2011 ). Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey. Lancet 377 63–73.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61266-4

  23. 23.

    Bavishi C. Dupont H. L. (2011 ). Systematic review: the use of proton pump inhibitors and increased susceptibility to enteric infection. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 34 1269–1281.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04874.x

  24. 24.

    Begley M. Hill C. Gahan C. G. M. (2006 ). Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 1729–1738.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.72.3.1729-1738.2006

  25. 25.

    Blaser M. J. (2014 ). The microbiome revolution. J. Clin. Invest. 124 4162–4165.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci78366

  26. 26.

    Bolton R. P. Tait S. K. Dear P. R. Losowsky M. S. (1984 ). Asymptomatic neonatal colonisation by Clostridium difficile. Arch. Dis. Child. 59 466–472.

    Not in our library10.1136/adc.59.5.466

  27. 27.

    Borriello S. P. Honour P. Turner T. Barclay F. (1983 ). Household pets as a potential reservoir for Clostridium difficile infection. J. Clin. Pathol. 36 84–87.

    Not in our library10.1136/jcp.36.1.84

  28. 28.
  29. 29.

    Buffie C. G. Bucci V. Stein R. R. McKenney P. T. Ling L. Gobourne A. (2015 ). Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile. Nature 517 205–208.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13828

  30. 30.

    Buffie C. G. Jarchum I. Equinda M. Lipuma L. Gobourne A. Viale A. (2012 ). Profound alterations of intestinal microbiota following a single dose of clindamycin results in sustained susceptibility to Clostridium difficile-induced colitis. Infect. Immun. 80 62–73.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.05496-11

  31. 31.

    Buonomo E. L. Petri W. A. (2016 ). The microbiota and immune response during Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 41 79–84.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.05.009

  32. 32.

    Campbell R. R. Beere D. Wilcock G. K. Brown E. M. (1988 ). Clostridium difficile in acute and long-stay elderly patients. Age Ageing 17 333–336.

    Not in our library10.1093/ageing/17.5.333

  33. 33.

    Carroll K. C. Bartlett J. G. (2011 ). Biology of Clostridium difficile: implications for epidemiology and diagnosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 65 501–521.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102824

  34. 34.

    Chang J. Y. Antonopoulos D. A. Kalra A. Tonelli A. Khalife W. T. Schmidt T. M. (2008 ). Decreased diversity of the fecal Microbiome in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J. Infect. Dis. 197 435–438.

    Not in our library10.1086/525047

  35. 35.

    Chang V. T. Nelson K. (2000 ). The role of physical proximity in nosocomial diarrhea. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31 717–722.

    Not in our library10.1086/314030

  36. 36.

    Chen X. Katchar K. Goldsmith J. D. Nanthakumar N. Cheknis A. Gerding D. N. (2008 ). A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 135 1984–1992.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.002

  37. 37.

    Cheng S. H. Lu J. J. Young T. G. Perng C. L. Chi W. M. (1997 ). Clostridium difficile–associated diseases: comparison of symptomatic infection versus carriage on the basis of risk factors, toxin production, and genotyping results. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25 157–158.

    Not in our library10.1086/516891

  38. 38.

    Clooten J. Kruth S. Arroyo L. Weese J. S. (2008 ). Prevalence and risk factors for Clostridium difficile colonization in dogs and cats hospitalized in an intensive care unit. Vet. Microbiol. 129 209–214.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.11.013

  39. 39.

    Cohen S. H. Gerding D. N. Johnson S. Kelly C. P. Loo V. G. McDonald L. C. (2010 ). Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 31 431–455.

    Not in our library10.1086/651706

  40. 40.

    Cornely O. A. Crook D. W. Esposito R. Poirier A. Somero M. S. Weiss K. (2012 ). Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for infection with Clostridium difficile in Europe, Canada, and the USA: a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 12 281–289.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70374-7

All 208 references

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.