Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.

A Systematic Review of In vitro and In vivo Activities of Anti-Toxoplasma Drugs and Compounds (2006–2016)

Mahbobeh Montazeri, Mehdi Sharif, Shahabeddin Sarvi and 3 more

Frontiers in Microbiology · 2017 · Review

doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00025

Abstract

The currently available anti-Toxoplasma agents have serious limitations. This systematic review was performed to evaluate drugs and new compounds used for the treatment of toxoplasmosis. Data was systematically collected from published papers on the efficacy of drugs/ compounds used against Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) globally during 2006-2016. The searched databases were PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, ISI Web of Science, EBSCO, and Scopus. One hundred and eighteen papers were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review, which were both in vitro and in vivo studies. Within this review, 80 clinically available drugs and a large number of new compounds with more than 39 mechanisms of action were evaluated. Interestingly, many of the drugs/ compounds evaluated against T. gondii act on the apicoplast. Therefore, the apicoplast represents as a potential drug target for new chemotherapy. Based on the current findings, 49 drugs/ compounds demonstrated in vitro half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of below 1 μM, but most of them were not evaluated further for in vivo effectiveness. However, the derivatives of the ciprofloxacin, endochin-like quinolones and 1-[4-(4-nitrophenoxy) phenyl] propane-1-one (NPPP) were significantly active against T. gondii tachyzoites both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, these compounds are promising candidates for future studies. Also, compound 32 (T. gondii calcium-dependent protein kinase 1inhibitor), endochin-like quinolones, miltefosine, rolipram abolish, and guanabenz can be repurposed into an effective anti-parasitic with a unique ability to reduce brain tissue cysts (88.7 %, 88%, 78%, 74%, and 69%, respectively). Additionally, no promising drugs are available for congenital toxoplasmosis. In conclusion, as current chemotherapy against toxoplasmosis is still not satisfactory, development of well-tolerated and safe specific immunoprophylaxis in relaxing the need of dependence on chemotherapeutics is a highly valu¬able goal for global disease control. However, with the increasing number of high-risk individuals, and absence of a proper vaccine, continued efforts are necessary for the development of novel treatment options against T. gondii. Some of the novel compounds reviewed here may represent good starting points for the discovery of effective new drugs. In further bioinformatic and in silico studies are needed in order to identify new potential toxoplasmicidal drugs.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii), an obligate intracellular, parasitic protozoan, is the etiologic agent of toxoplasmosis. About 30–50% of the world population is infected with the parasite, and it is the most prevalent infection among humans (Tenter et al.,; Flegr et al., ). Worldwide, over 1 billion people are estimated to be infected with T. gondii (Hoffmann et al., ). Its prevalence in some countries is high (e.g., Brazil, 77.5%; Sao Tome and Principe, 75.2%; Iran, 63.9%; Colombia, 63.5%; and Cuba, 61.8%) (Pappas et al., ). The annual incidence of congenital toxoplasmosis was estimated to be 190,100 cases globally (Torgerson and Mastroiacovo, ).

In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that 22.5% of the population 12 years and older have been infected with Toxoplasma with 1.1 million new infections each year, making it the second most common cause of deaths due to foodborne diseases (an estimated 327 deaths) and the fourth leading cause of hospitalizations attributable to foodborne illness (an estimated 4428 hospitalizations). Also, an estimated 400–4000 infants are born with congenital toxoplasmosis in the United States each year (Jones et al., ).

T. gondii has three infectious stages of sporozoites (in oocysts), tachyzoites (rapidly multiplying form), and bradyzoites (tissue cyst form). Among them, tachyzoites are responsible for clinical manifestations and the acute phase of the disease. They are susceptible to the immune response of the host and to drug action. The resistant cyst form of the parasite is resistant to both the immune system and drugs (Hill and Dubey, ).

Acute toxoplasmosis in healthy individuals is usually subclinical and asymptomatic, but may lead to chronic infection. However, toxoplasmosis can lead to great morbidity and mortality rates in imunocompromised or congenitally infected individuals (Dubey and Jones,; Ahmadpour et al., ). In AIDS patients, presence of the parasite causes necrotizing encephalitis and focal cerebral lesions in the central nervous system (CNS) from primary or recrudescent infection. In immunocompetent patients, latent toxoplasmosis occurs with the formation of cysts principally in the CNS (Martins-Duarte et al., ).

In the recent years, the development of well-tolerated and safe specific immunoprophylaxis against toxoplasmosis is a highly valuable goal for global disease control (Lim and Othman, ). Immunotherapeutics strategies for improving toxoplasmosis control could either be a vaccine which would induce strong protective immunity against toxoplasmosis, or passive immunization in cases of disease recrudescence. In the last few years, much progress has been made in vaccine research on DNA vaccination, protein vaccination, live attenuated vaccinations, and heterologous vaccination; while there were few candidates on passive immunization. New vaccine candidates have been tested, including in particular proteins from T. gondii ROP, MIC, and GRA organelles, multi-antigen vaccines, novel adjuvants but until now the researches could not access to a proper vaccine for prevention of toxoplasmosis in human (Zhang et al.,, ).

The recommended drugs for treatment or prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis are pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine. Unfortunately, these drugs have side effects such as neutropenia, severe drop of platelet count, thrombocytopenia, leucopenia, elevation in serum creatinine and serum liver enzymes, hematological abnormalities, and hypersensitivity reactions (Bosch-Driessen et al.,; Silveira et al.,; Schmidt et al., ). In addition, other drugs, such as azithromycin, clarithromycin, spiramycin, atovaquone, dapsone, and cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), have been used for clinical toxoplasmosis. However, these drugs are poorly tolerated and have no effect on the bradyzoite form (Araujo and Remington,; Petersen and Schmidt,; Serranti et al., ).

In a clinical trial, 24% of sera positive women treated with spiramycin and pyrimethamine plus sulfadoxine combination delivered Toxoplasma infected infants in France (Bessières et al., ). Spiramycin monotherapy can be effective during the early stage of pregnancy to prevent prenatal transmission (Julliac et al., ). More than 50% of patients treated with spiramycin retained T. gondii DNA in blood and remained infected (Habib, ).

In recent years, studies have focused on finding safe drugs with novel mechanisms of action against T. gondii. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to evaluate new drugs based on novel and innovative therapeutic strategies against T. gondii that are both efficacious and nontoxic for humans (Rodriguez and Szajnman,; Vanagas et al.,; Angel et al., ). Therefore, the goal of the present systematic review was to retrieve published studies related to in vitro and in vivo evaluation of drugs and compounds for the treatment of toxoplasmosis (2006–2016) in order to prepare comprehensive data for designing more accurate investigations in future.

Methodology

This review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., ).

Literature search, study selection, and data extraction

English databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Science, and EBSCO, were systematically searched for papers on in vitro and in vivo evaluation of anti-Toxoplasma activities of drugs and compounds, published worldwide, from 2006 to 2016. The keywords included were: “Toxoplasmosis,” “T. gondii,” “Anti-Toxoplasma,” “Drug,” “Anticoccidial,” “Treatment,” “In vitro,” “In vivo,” and “Compound.”

Papers written in English were selected. Gray literature and abstracts of articles which were published in congresses were not explored. In addition, in order to avoid missing any articles, whole references of the papers were meticulously hand-searched. Among English articles found with the mentioned strategies, full text papers that used laboratory method both in vitro and in vivo were included.

Also, studies with at least one of the following criteria were excluded: (1) studies that were not relevant; (2) articles not available in English; (3) studies on treatments for ocular infection; (4) articles that were of review or descriptive study type; (5) articles which contained no eligible data; (6) case series reports; (7) the data were duplicated from other studies or we were unable to obtain them; (8) those that were on efficacy of anti-T. gondii medicines in humans; and (9) any drug with an IC50 value > 10 μM.

Data collection

All the experimental studies that were carried out to evaluate the efficacy of either drugs or compounds against T. gondii both in vitro and in vivo were included, and replicates were excluded. The inclusion criteria for selection of in vitro studies were important information about medication used for the experiments, type of cells used for culture, identification of the Toxoplasma strain, laboratory methods used for assessing drug activities, and main results comprising of the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50). We reported in vivo studies used animal models, Toxoplasma strain, route of infection, the treatment schedule (dosage, route of administration, duration of treatment), the criteria for assessing drug activity (mainly survival for acute toxoplasmosis, histology, and brain cyst burdens for chronic infection), and the main results.

Analysis of the included literature

A total of 118 papers (83 studies in vitro, 59 in vivo, 27 both in vitro and in vivo) published from 2006 to 2016, were included in the systematic review. Figure 1 briefly shows the search process in this systematic review article.

Mechanisms of action

In the current systematic review, 80 clinically available drugs (Table 1) and several new compounds with more than 39 pathways/ mechanisms of action were evaluated against T. gondii in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Several target based drug screens were also identified against T. gondii include mitochondrial electron transport chain, calcium-dependent protein kinase 1, type II fatty acid synthesis, DNA synthesis, DNA replication, etc. (Table 2). Also, drugs/compounds with known mechanisms of action on life stages of T. gondii are shown in Figure 2. Our collective data indicated that many of the drugs/ compounds evaluated against T. gondii act on the apicoplast. Therefore, the apicoplast represents as a potential drug target for new chemotherapy.

The investigated strains

T. gondii has three main clonal lineages in population structure; type I (including a highly virulent RH strain), Type II (including ME49 and PRU, avirulent strains), and Type III (including avirulent strains like NED), which is correlated with virulence expression in mice (Howe and Sibley, ).

In vitro and in vivo screening methods were used of type I T. gondii (mostly RH strain; 76 studies in vitro, and 36 in vivo). Because type I RH strain is highly virulent in mice, causing 100% mortality, but types II and III are relatively less virulent. Although in some studies, ME49 (7 studies in vitro, and 17 in vivo), Prugniaud, EGS, and VEG strains were used, which showed that the outcome of infections depends on the challenge dose and on the genotype of the host (Szabo and Finney, ). Details about the investigated strains in vitro and in vivo are shown in Tables 3, 4, respectively.

Cell culture

The cell cultures used in in vitro studies were mostly human foreskin fibroblast (HFF; 39 studies), LLCMK2 (12 studies), Vero (11 studies), Hela (6 studies), mouse macrophage cell line (J774A.1) (5 studies), and MRC-5 (2 studies; Table 3).

Laboratory animals

T. gondii can infect most warm-blooded animals, and is studied in different animal models depending on the nature of the investigation (Szabo and Finney, ). The animal model used in studies was mostly mice (16 studies BALB/c and 19 studies Swiss-Webster). In murine models of acute toxoplasmosis, some medicines were protective even when administered at low dosages. But some drugs despite of their excellent in vitro activity were poorly protective in murine models with acute toxoplasmosis (Payne et al., ).

Diagnostic tests and evaluation methods

The present review outlines the results of in vitro screening methods including morphological assay, incorporation of [3H] uracil assay, plaque assays, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), colorimetric micro titer assay (b-galactosidase assay), flow cytometric quantification assay, and cell viability assay. Numerous versions of fluorescent proteins have been expressed in T. gondii (Kim et al., ). The reporter genes used in vitro and in vivo studies were the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). Parasites expressing fluorescent proteins can also be analyzed and sorted by flow cytometry. This technology used for drugs screening in 10 studies.

Details about the diagnostic methods and drug dosage under in vivo conditions are shown in Table 4. Also, a comprehensive list of drugs/compounds evaluated against T. gondii with regard to IC50 is illustrated in Table 5.

Discussion

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the in vitro and in vivo effects of anti-Toxoplasma drugs and synthetic compounds, from 2006 to 2016. The current anti-T. gondii chemotherapy is deficient; as it is not well-tolerated by immunocompromised patients and cannot completely eradicate tissue cysts produced by the parasite (Rodriguez and Szajnman, ). Therefore, developing new, safe, effective, and well-tolerated drugs with novel mechanisms of action could be a global priority (Lai et al., ). An ideal drug for prophylaxis and/or treatment of toxoplasmosis would show effective penetration and concentration in the placenta, transplacental passage, parasiticidal properties vs. the different parasitic stages, penetration into cysts, and distribution in the main sites. No available drug fulfills these criteria (Derouin et al.,; Montoya and Liesenfeld, ).

Thus, the findings of the present systematic review article encourage and support more accurate investigations for future to select new anti-Toxoplasma drugs and strategies in designing new targets with specific activity against the parasite.

Activities of anti-toxoplasma clinically available drugs

With growing parasite resistance to therapeutic drugs and in the absence of a vaccine, to increase the effectiveness of drugs, various changes have been made in construction of the clinically available medicines. Thus, the activity of new formulations of clinically available drugs against T. gondii should be evaluated to find alternative treatments for toxoplasmosis (da Cunha et al., ).

Interestingly, encapsulation of pyrimethamine improved the efficacy and tolerability of this drug against acute toxoplasmosis in mice and can be considered as an alternative for reducing the dose and side effects of pyrimethamine (Pissinate et al., ). Recently, researchers reported that computational analysis of biochemical differences between human and T. gondii dihydrofolate reductase enabled the design of inhibitors with both improved potency and selectivity against T. gondii (Welsch et al., ). El-Zawawy et al. reported that incorporating triclosan into in the lipid bilayer of liposomes allowed its use in lower doses, which in turn, reduced its biochemical adverse effects (El-Zawawy et al., ). In another study, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-coated atovaquone nanosuspensions (ANSs) considerably increased the therapeutic efficacy against experimentally reactivated and acquired toxoplasmosis by improving passage of gastrointestinal and blood-brain barriers. Accordingly, coating of ANSs with SDS may improve the treatment of toxoplasmic encephalitis and other cerebral diseases (Shubar et al., ).

Also, various studies showed that a number of drugs were investigated for the mechanisms of action summarized in Table 2 and Figure 2. One study discussing the metabolic differences between the host and the parasite noted that dihydrofolate reductase, isoprenoid pathway, and T. gondii histone deacetylase are promising molecular targets (Rodriguez and Szajnman, ).

Novel triazine JPC-2067-B (4, 6-diamino-1, 2-dihydro-2, 2-dimethyl-1-(3′(2-chloro-, 4-trifluoromethoxyphenoxy)propyloxy)-1, 3, 5-triazine), the anti-folate medicines, is highly effective against T. gondii with an IC50 of 0.02 μM, which is more efficacious than pyrimethamine and has in vitro cidal activity. Additionally, pro-drug JPC-2056 (1-(3′-(2-chloro-4-trifluoromethoxyphenyloxy) propyl oxy)-5-isopropylbiguanide) is effective in vivo when administered orally (Mui et al., ). Moreover, histone deacetylase is potentially a very important drug target in T. gondii, since scriptaid and trichostatin A had the highest effect against T. gondii tachyzoite proliferation with the IC50 of 0.039 and 0.041 μM, respectively (Strobl et al., ). For promising anti- T. gondii drugs/compounds, assessment of their ability to control parasite growth is a key step in drug development (McFarland et al., ).

A large number of research papers suggested that the apicoplast represents a potential drug target for new chemotherapy, as it is essential to the parasite and it is absent in host cells. Functions of the apicoplast include fatty acid synthesis, protein synthesis, DNA replication, electron transport, and heme biosynthesis (Yung and Lang-Unnasch, ). Some of the drugs evaluated against T. gondii are shown to act in the apicoplast such as thiolactomycin, triclosan (TS), azithromycin, fusidic acid, ciprofloxacin, and quinoline derivatives (Costa et al.,; Martins-Duarte et al.,,; Payne et al.,; Kadri et al.,; El-Zawawy et al., ).

In T. gondii, FAS-II enzymes are present in the apicoplast and are essential for its survival. The key enzyme in this process is the ENR enzyme, which is not found in mammals (Surolia and Surolia, ). This enzyme catalyzes the last reductive step of the type II FAS pathway. The TS, which inhibits type II FAS, significantly reduced mice mortality, parasite burden, as well as viability and infectivity of tachyzoites and cysts harvested from infected treated mice and their brains. Accordingly, TS is proved as an effective, promising, and safe preventive drug against acute and chronic murine toxoplasmosis. Liposomal formulation of TS enhanced its efficacy and allowed its use at a lower dose (Surolia and Surolia,; El-Zawawy et al.,,). Among apicoplast pathways, DNA replication is an important potential chemotherapeutic target. Fluoroquinolones are the known DNA replication inhibitors that target prokaryotic type II topoisomerases (Collin et al., ). In two studies, researchers showed that derivatives of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone, are active against T. gondii tachyzoites both in vitro and in vivo (Neville et al., ). While all mice treated with ciprofloxacin died by day 10 post-infection, some mice treated with ciprofloxacin derivatives remained alive for at least 60 days, suggesting that ciprofloxacin derivatives cured T. gondii infection in treated mice (Dubar et al.,; Martins-Duarte et al., ).

Anti-toxoplasma activities of new synthetic compounds

There are numerous reports on efficacy of many new synthetic compounds with a focus on identifying drug candidates with innovative and acceptable profiles against T. gondii. The anti-coccidial effect of 1-[4-(4-nitrophenoxy) phenyl] propane-1-one (NPPP), a synthetic compound, was studied both in vitro and in vivo. Treatment with NPPP showed anti-Toxoplasma activity in vitro with a lower EC50 value than pyrimethamine. In ICR mice infected with T. gondii, oral administration of NPPP for 4 days showed statistically significant anti-Toxoplasma activity with lower number of tachyzoites than those of the negative control (Choi et al., ).

In a study by Kadri et al. anti-Toxoplasma properties of 58 newly synthesized quinoline compounds were evaluated. A significant improvement in anti-Toxoplasma effect among quinoline derivatives was detected in B11, B12, B23, and B24. Among these compounds, B23 was the most effective compound with the IC50 value of < 1 μM, displaying its anti-Toxoplasma effects and ability to cause the disappearance of the apicoplast (40–45% of the parasites lost their apicoplasts; Kadri et al., ).

In a study by Boyom et al. the strategy adopted was to repurpose the open access Malaria Box to identify chemical series active against T. gondii. The results showed that the most interesting compound was MMV007791, a piperazine acetamide, which has an IC50 of 0.19 μM. This compound is novel for its anti-Toxoplasma activity, and of course, further studies on the rates and mechanisms of compound action will elucidate these considerations (Boyom et al., ).

Tetraoxanes, anti-cancer molecules, were tested in vivo against T. gondii. Subcutaneous, administration of a 10 mg/kg/day dose of derivative 21, for 8 days allowed the survival of 20% of infected mice, demonstrating the high potential of tetraoxanes for the treatment of T. gondii (Opsenica et al., ).

In another study by Moine et al. researchers evaluated in vitro anti-T. gondii activity of 51 compounds with a biphenylimidazoazine scaffold. Eight of these compounds displayed highly potent activity against T. gondii growth in vitro, with 50% effective concentration (EC50) below 1 mM, without demonstrating cytotoxic effects on human fibroblastic cell at equivalent concentrations. However, these compounds have to be evaluated in animal models so as to confirm their in vivo activity (Moine et al., ).

Several pathways were characterized and shown to differ significantly from those of the mammalian host cells, thus, revealing an attractive area for therapeutic intervention. 1-Hydroxy-2-Alkyl-4 (1H) quinolone derivatives inhibit the fourth step of the essential de novo synthesis of pyrimidine, which uses ubiquinol reduction as an electron sink for dihydroorotate oxidation (Saleh et al., ). Also, newly synthesized bisphosphonates interfere with the mevanolate pathway, which leads to the synthesis of sterols and polyisoprenoid compounds that are important for parasite survival (Shubar et al., ).

Interestingly, Kamau et al. identified novel kinases that are integral to essential pathways, elucidating their mechanism of action and ultimately, identifying new drug targets (Kamau et al., ). In that study, 527 compounds were evaluated in vitro; also, they assessed the impact of the inhibitory compounds C1, C2, C3, and C5 in mouse models of toxoplasmosis. C2 was found quite effective in decreasing the parasite burden and increasing mice survival. These results should be considered with caution, since there are a number of factors are at play in whether a compound will be in vivo effective, such as solubility in vivo, access to different tissues, and host metabolic processes (Kamau et al., ). In a recent study, Dittmar et al. screened a collection of 1,120 compounds, 94 of which were blocked parasite replications with IC50 of <5 μM. These data suggest that tamoxifen restricts Toxoplasma growth by inducing xenophagy or autophagic destruction of this parasite (Dittmar et al., ). According to a new study, in silico screening is useful, particularly in the identification of molecular targets in the laboratory. Fernandez et al. synthesized VAM2 compounds (7-nitroquinoxalin-2-ones), based on the design obtained from an in silico prediction with the software TOMOCOMD-CARDD. From the group of VAM2 compounds, Fernandez et al. chose VAM2-2 with an IC50 of 3.3 μM against T. gondii. However, more studies are required to evaluate its effect on the cysts formed by of the parasite and in animal models of toxoplasmosis (Fernández et al., ).

Activity of drugs, compounds, and combined therapy against cysts

An ideal drug against toxoplasmosis should not only be effective against the proliferative stage of the parasite but also exert dual activity against the tissue cyst stage and penetration into cysts (Benmerzouga et al., ). Currently, there is no approved therapy that eliminates the tissue cysts responsible for chronic infection (Innes, ). Derouin reported that among the drugs commonly used in humans, only atovaquone and azithromycin were found effective after long-term incubation. Besides, arpinocid-N-oxyde, an anticoccidial for veterinary use, was efficient at a high dosage (Derouin, ).

Recently, investigators have focused on guanabenz for in vivo studies, as guanabenz inhibitor of eIF2a dephosphorylation, is already an food and drug administration (FDA) approved drug and has excellent solubility with good penetration into the CNS. The results of that study show that guanabenz (5 mg/kg/day) not only protects mice against acute toxoplasmosis, but also reduces 69% of the number of brain cysts in chronically infected animals. This finding suggested that guanabenz can be repurposed into an effective antiparasitic with a unique ability to diminish tissue cysts in the brain (Benmerzouga et al., ).

Another study showed that miltefosine had no efficacy in controlling acute toxoplasmosis after 5 days of treatment; however, a 15-day treatment against the established chronic stage led to a 78% reduction of cysts in the brain. Additionally, the remaining cysts were noticeably smaller upon microscopic examination, suggesting that the drug effectively penetrates the blood-brain barrier, and that extension of treatment time may produce greater effects (Eissa et al., ).

In another study by Maubon et al. FR235222 and its derivatives were identified as new lead compounds for use against acute and chronic toxoplasmosis both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo experiments indicated that FR235222, as a histone deacetylase inhibitor, is able to access the bradyzoites within the cyst. The ability of FR235222 to permeate the membrane wall is a major advantage for crossing the blood-brain barrier and CNS tissue, where Toxoplasma cysts are located. This opens a promising way to develop drugs that are selective against Toxoplasma and those that have sterilizing activity, especially in patients with cysts, who are at risk for reactivating acute toxoplasmosis (patients with HIV infection, hematological malignancies, or transplantation). Still, effectiveness of FR235222 against chronically infected mice remains to be directly demonstrated in vivo (Maubon et al., ).

In a new study Vidadala et al. identified compounds 32 (T. gondii calcium-dependent protein kinase 1 inhibitor) a promising lead for the development of a new antitoxoplasmosis therapy. Compounds 32 is CNS-penetrant and highly effective in acute and latent mouse models of T. gondii infection, significantly reducing brain cysts by 88.7% (Vidadala et al., ).

Many studies reported anti- Toxoplasma effects of different drugs combination with novel compounds. The compound 2-hydroxy-3-(1′-propen-3-phenyl)-1, 4-naphthoquinone (PHNQ6), (50 mg/kg/day) combined with sulfadiazine showed reduction or elimination of brain cysts in vivo (Ferreira et al., ). In another study that coadministered spiramycin and metronidazole, spiramycin, did not reach effective concentrations in the brain due to the presence of the efflux transporters multidrug-resistant protein 2, and P-glycoprotein. Metronidazole increased brain penetration of spiramycin, causing a significant reduction of T. gondii brain cysts, with potential clinical translatability for chronic toxoplasmosis treatment. According to the reports, combination therapy leads to faster recovery, less relapse, lower doses of drugs, and fewer side effects of the disease. Furthermore, such combinations are highly promising to develop a drug that is able to eliminate the cyst stage of the parasite, and thus, efficiently impairs relapse of the disease (Chew et al.,; Martins-Duarte et al., ).

Activity of drugs against congenital toxoplasmosis

In pregnant women, current toxoplasmosis treatment is based on the administration of spiramycin or a drug combination such as sulphadiazine-pyrimethamine-folinic acid (SPFA) in cases of confirmed fetal infection. However, these drugs are not well-tolerated and present many adverse effects due to their toxic effects to the host (Degerli et al., ).

Degerli et al. evaluated the effectiveness of azithromycin, artemisia annua infusion, spiramycin, and SPFA in Calomys callosus, such as model of congenital toxoplasmosis. The results demonstrated that the treatment of pregnant C. callosus with azithromycin was effective for inhibiting the vertical transmission of T. gondii ME49 strain, suggesting that it may be an alternative drug of choice for the treatment of congenital infection, since it is able to inhibit fetal infection and offers new perspectives for the treatment of congenital toxoplasmosis. Azithromycin is one of the new generation macrolides with numerous advantages. Mechanism of action of azithromycin is based on the inhibition of protein synthesis in both T. gondii tachyzoite and bradyzoite stages (Degerli et al., ), but it may present limited effectiveness against T. gondii, requiring high drug concentrations (Costa et al., ). In another study, Oz et al. reported that combined atovaquone and diclazuril therapy is a novel synergistic prophylactic and therapeutic approach to fetal maternal toxoplasmosis (Oz, ). Atovaquone, an inhibitor of mitochondrial electron-transport processes, is an FDA-approved toxoplasmosis therapy but not for use in congenital toxoplasmosis treatment (Oz, ). Another compound, diclazuril, and its related benzeneacetonitriles have long been used in the treatment and prevention of poultry and livestock coccidiosis. In addition, it is known to be a safe compound at therapeutic dose levels (Assis et al., ).

Adverse effects of drugs

However, anti-Toxoplasma effects of drugs/compounds were reported in many trials, but prednisolone increased the number of tachyzoites and bradyzoites in immunosuppressed infected mice (Puvanesuaran et al., ). In addition, betamethasone can escalate the invasion of tachyzoites, in cell culture. It could be suggested that patients under prolonged use of betamethasone and prednisolone should be protected against T. gondii infection. Also, if individuals receiving betamethasone are infected with T. gondii, interferon-gamma may be used to reduce the invasion of tachyzoites (Ghaffarifar et al., ).

Conclusions

As current chemotherapy against toxoplasmosis is still not satisfactory, the development of well-tolerated and safe specific immunoprophylaxis in relaxing the need of dependence on chemotherapeutics is a highly valuable goal for global disease control. Immunotherapeutics strategies for improving toxoplasmosis control could either be a vaccine which would induce strong protective immunity against toxoplasmosis, or passive immunization in cases of disease recrudescence. However, with the increasing number of high-risk individuals, such as immunocompromised patients, and absence of a proper vaccine, continued efforts are necessary for the development of novel treatment options against T. gondii. Some of the novel compounds reviewed here may represent good starting points for the discovery of effective new drugs. In further bioinformatic and in silico studies are needed in order to identify new potential toxoplasmicidal drugs.

Author contributions

AD and MS conceived the idea for this review. MM and SS searched the databases for potentially eligible articles based on their titles and abstracts. AD and MM participated in the study design and wrote the manuscript. SM and EA critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 161

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  48. 48.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  49. 49.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  68. 68.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  69. 69.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  70. 70.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  71. 71.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  74. 74.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  78. 78.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  81. 81.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  87. 87.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  88. 88.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  90. 90.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  92. 92.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  94. 94.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  97. 97.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  98. 98.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  99. 99.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  101. 101.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  102. 102.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  105. 105.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  106. 106.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  108. 108.
  109. 109.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  110. 110.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  112. 112.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  113. 113.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  114. 114.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  115. 115.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  116. 116.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  117. 117.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  118. 118.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  119. 119.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  120. 120.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  121. 121.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  123. 123.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  124. 124.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  126. 126.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  127. 127.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  128. 128.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  129. 129.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  131. 131.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  132. 132.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  134. 134.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  135. 135.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  136. 136.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  137. 137.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  138. 138.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  139. 139.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  140. 140.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  141. 141.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  142. 142.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  143. 143.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  144. 144.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  145. 145.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  146. 146.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  147. 147.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  150. 150.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  151. 151.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  152. 152.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  153. 153.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  155. 155.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  156. 156.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  157. 157.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  158. 158.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  159. 159.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  160. 160.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  161. 161.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.