Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene primer pairs for monitoring microbial community structures showed high reproducibility within and low comparability between datasets generated with multiple archaeal and bacterial primer pairs

References 105

1. 1.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

5. 5.
   Primer and platform effects on 16S rRNA tag sequencing · 2015

   No notice
6. 6.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

7. 7.
   Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range · 2015

   Corrected
8. 8.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

11. 11.
    Synthetic microbial communities · 2014

    No notice
12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

17. 17.
    Archaea on Human Skin · 2013

    No notice
18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

35. 35.
    Biased Diversity Metrics Revealed by Bacterial 16S Pyrotags Derived from Different Primer Sets · 2013

    No notice
36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

43. 43.
    Direct Comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 Sequencing Technologies on the Same Microbial Community DNA Sample · 2012

    Corrected
44. 44.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

45. 45.
    The Earth Microbiome Project: Meeting report of the “1st EMP meeting on sample selection and acquisition” at Argonne National Laboratory October 6th 2010. · 2010

    No notice
46. 46.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

48. 48.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

49. 49.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

50. 50.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

51. 51.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

52. 52.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

53. 53.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

54. 54.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

55. 55.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

56. 56.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

57. 57.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

58. 58.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

59. 59.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

60. 60.
    Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies · 2011

    No notice
61. 61.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

62. 62.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

63. 63.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

64. 64.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

65. 65.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

66. 66.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

67. 67.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

68. 68.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

69. 69.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

70. 70.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

71. 71.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

72. 72.
    The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies · 2015

    No notice
73. 73.
    Microbiota of the indoor environment: a meta-analysis · 2015

    No notice
74. 74.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

75. 75.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

76. 76.
    Characterization of a biogas-producing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing · 2012

    No notice
77. 77.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

78. 78.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

79. 79.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

80. 80.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

81. 81.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

82. 82.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

83. 83.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

84. 84.
    Simultaneous Amplicon Sequencing to Explore Co-Occurrence Patterns of Bacterial, Archaeal and Eukaryotic Microorganisms in Rumen Microbial Communities · 2013

    No notice
85. 85.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

86. 86.
    Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data · 2014

    No notice
87. 87.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

88. 88.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

89. 89.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

90. 90.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

91. 91.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

92. 92.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

93. 93.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

94. 94.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

95. 95.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

96. 96.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

97. 97.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

98. 98.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

99. 99.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

100. 100.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

101. 101.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

102. 102.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

103. 103.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

104. 104.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

105. 105.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 3

• Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing · 2021
  No notice
• Gut Microbiota beyond Bacteria—Mycobiome, Virome, Archaeome, and Eukaryotic Parasites in IBD · 2020
  No notice
• First Insights into the Diverse Human Archaeome: Specific Detection of Archaea in the Gastrointestinal Tract, Lung, and Nose and on Skin · 2017
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.