Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.

Potential Impact of the Resistance to Quaternary Ammonium Disinfectants on the Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in Food Processing Environments

Joaquín V. Martínez-Suárez, Sagrario Ortiz, Victoria López-Alonso

Frontiers in Microbiology · 2016 · Review

doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00638

Abstract

The persistence of certain strains of Listeria monocytogenes, even after the food processing environment has been cleaned and disinfected, suggests that this may be related to phenomena that reduce the concentration of the disinfectants to subinhibitory levels. This includes (i) the existence of environmental niches or reservoirs that are difficult for disinfectants to reach, (ii) microorganisms that form biofilms and create microenvironments in which adequate concentrations of disinfectants cannot be attained, and (iii) the acquisition of resistance mechanisms in L. monocytogenes, including those that lead to a reduction in the intracellular concentration of the disinfectants. The only available data with regard to the resistance of L. monocytogenes to disinfectants applied in food production environments refer to genotypic resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). Although there are several well-characterized efflux pumps that confer resistance to QACs, it is a low-level resistance that does not generate resistance to QACs at the concentrations applied in the food industry. However, dilution in the environment and biodegradation result in QAC concentration gradients. As a result, the microorganisms are frequently exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of QACs. Therefore, the low-level resistance to QACs in L. monocytogenes may contribute to its environmental adaptation and persistence. In fact, in certain cases, the relationship between low-level resistance and the environmental persistence of L. monocytogenes in different food production chains has been previously established. The resistant strains would have survival advantages in these environments over sensitive strains, such as the ability to form biofilms in the presence of increased biocide concentrations.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive foodborne pathogen that can cause listeriosis, a relatively uncommon illness with a 20–30% case fatality rate. The majority of cases of human listeriosis are caused by contaminated processed foods. Although the original source of the contamination may be the raw food materials used in the processing plants, the strains of L. monocytogenes present in the final food products are usually different from the strains in the raw materials. In addition, when listeriosis outbreaks have been investigated, contamination is usually traced to the processing environment and equipment. This suggests that the contamination mainly occurs during the processing of food and is primarily due to strains from the processing plant environment.

Environmental Persistence

The molecular characterization of L. monocytogenes isolates from the food processing environment regularly shows the presence of a reduced number of molecular subtypes and the long-term persistence of specific strains that can contaminate food and cause foodborne listeriosis. The detection of highly similar isolates from different areas inside single establishments, and their environmental persistence, is a matter of concern for the hygienic management of food establishments.

assert that L. monocytogenes persistence is primarily a random process given that “there are no strains with unique properties that lead to persistence but harborage sites in food industry premises and equipment where L. monocytogenes can persist.” Persistent strains of L. monocytogenes have occasionally been isolated in food processing environments after cleaning and disinfection. As demonstrated by the findings of studies reviewed here, the persistence of certain strains of L. monocytogenes after cleaning and disinfecting is not a completely random process, but rather an event related to different situations that result in subinhibitory concentrations of disinfectants at different scales. This includes: (i) local environmental conditions that can lead to the formation of niches or reservoirs that are difficult for disinfectants to reach; (ii) microorganisms that form biofilms and create microenvironments in which adequate concentrations of disinfectants cannot be attained; and (iii) the acquisition of resistance mechanisms in L. monocytogenes, including those that lead to a reduction in the intracellular concentration of the disinfectants.

There are numerous factors in food processing plants, such as insufficient cleaning before disinfection, disinfection of wet surfaces, and dosage failure that can lead to subinhibitory concentrations of disinfectants, thus reducing their efficiency. This reduction may be especially significant in certain niches or reservoirs in which water and organic matter are abundant, creating an environment where bacteria can survive and multiply readily.

Failure to effectively clean and disinfect the processing plant environment may contribute to biofilm formation in certain niches, leading to bacterial persistence. Cells embedded in the biofilm matrix display an increased resistance to biocide treatments. However, the resistance to disinfectants in sessile cells (biofilms) and in planktonic cells (free-floating) are clearly different phenomena. Resistance of biofilms to disinfectants is considered to be a form of “phenotypic resistance” since bacterial resistance is mainly induced by a physiological adaptation to the biofilm mode of life and can be lost or markedly reduced when biofilm cells revert to the planktonic state. In contrast, in the case of planktonic cells, a bacterial strain is defined as being resistant to a biocide if it is not inhibited by a specific concentration that usually inhibit the majority of other strains; that is, planktonic cell resistance depends on intrinsic cellular attributes such as intra-species (i.e., strain) variability in the MIC of a given disinfectant.

Resistance To Disinfectants

The only available data with regard to the resistance of L. monocytogenes to disinfectants applied in food production environments refer to genotypic resistance to QACs. BAC is typically used in studies assessing in vitro the activity of QACs. Increased MICs of BAC have been found in L. monocytogenes strains from different food production chains in different countries (Table 1). BAC resistance in L. monocytogenes is a low-level resistance. This means that the resistant strains only have a two to eight-fold increase in the MIC compared to the rest of the strains (Table 1). This resistance does not lead to QAC resistance at the concentrations that are normally used in the food industry (typically 200–1000 mg L-1). Therefore, QACs are considered to be an effective means of eliminating the resistant L. monocytogenes strains.

Some of these studies have been conducted with a large number of strains, and they report a variable frequency of resistant strains due to the diversity of the selection criteria for the strains studied. For example, the study of reports a very high frequency of resistant isolates because only samples of disinfected surfaces are included (Table 1). In some cases, selection for L. monocytogenes isolates resistant to QACs has been associated with the repeated use of this class of disinfectants.

In food processing environments, L. monocytogenes is exposed to different disinfectants and sanitizers, and sometimes at subinhibitory cocentrations. This is particularly true for disinfectants that are not fully biodegradable which may persist in sewage for long periods. For example, QACs are biodegradable only under aerobic conditions, resulting in continuously fluctuating concentration gradients. As a result, the microorganisms are frequently exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of QACs. Repeated exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of QACs and prolonged environmental persistence of certain strains may facilitate the development of resistance over time. Subinhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials may cause genetic changes in the bacteria by means of different pathways, including an increase in free radicals inside the cell or oxidative stress. This can trigger the SOS response which can promote either the expression of genes involved in horizontal gene transfer or mutagenesis through induction of the error-prone DNA polymerases.

Strains of L. monocytogenes with genotypic resistance to QACs may have mutations that lead to a reduction in cell permeability. For instance, resistant strains may have modifications in membrane fatty acids and phospholipids, which can lead to a more anionic and hydrophobic cell surface. This makes it difficult for QACs to pass through the membrane and enter the cell.

In other cases, resistance to QACs in L. monocytogenes may be due to the acquisition of QAC-specific efflux pumps through recombinant elements and mobile genetic elements. Different genetic markers have been identified that confer L. monocytogenes with a low-level resistance to QACs, including the resistance determinant bcrABC and the qacH gene of transposon Tn6188, as well as various qac determinants originally identified in staphylococci. All of these genes encode components of the efflux system in the small multidrug resistance (SMR) protein family group. Plasmids are also associated with L. monocytogenes resistance to BAC. Furthermore, plasmids with genes that confer resistance to BAC can be transferred between different pathogenic and non-pathogenic species of Listeria in the presence of QACs. This process also leads to the co-selection of resistance against heavy metals. In several screening studies of resistant strains, the qacH gene and the determinant bcrABC have been found. In one study, for example, resistance to BAC has been associated with the qacH gene in the majority (80%) of the tested strains, and a minority of the strains (12%) have been associated with the determinant bcrABC. Nevertheless, in other studies, only the qacH gene has been detected, while in others a clear predominance of the determinant bcrABC has been reported.

On the other hand, in some studies, the aforementioned determinants are not detected in certain resistant strains. In these cases, resistance may be due to the overexpression of endogenous efflux pumps due to mutations in regulatory elements. This can occur due to exposure to QACs or the stress induced by these compounds. These pumps are usually chromosomally encoded and affect a broad spectrum of antimicrobial compounds. In certain strains of L. monocytogenes that are resistant to BAC, QAC resistance has been associated with the overexpression of efflux pumps in the MFS (major facilitator superfamily) group, such as MdrL (multidrug resistant Listeria) and Lde (Listeria drug efflux). Recently, the overexpression of a new L. monocytogenes efflux pump (encoded by emrE) has been implicated in the resistance to QACs.

The Problem of Defining and Detecting Resistance

For various reasons, data on bacterial resistance to biocides is often difficult to interpret and compare. A potential reason for the difficulty in interpreting data on bacterial resistance to biocides is the absence of clear criteria for defining a microorganism as resistant to disinfectants. An ecological concept of resistance to biocides has been proposed based on the “natural” susceptibility of a given species. According to this criterion, an isolate is defined as resistant when it is not inhibited by a concentration that would inhibit most of the strains of that particular species. The resistant isolate is typically phenotypically different from the wild type because it has acquired a resistance mechanism through mutation or horizontal gene transfer. This commonly happens to L. monocytogenes strains that are resistant to BAC.

Another reason for the difficulty in comparing results on bacterial resistance is the lack of standardized tests for examining in vitro susceptibility to disinfectants. Susceptibility to disinfectants is often determined through the MIC technique (usually employing agar dilution or broth dilution methods) (Table 1). However, in some cases, the MICs obtained through different methods can produce different results, which is why standardization is necessary. The influence of the culture media is especially important to consider when detecting low-level resistance (Table 1). Therefore, we recommend the use of standardized clinical protocols that are designed to evaluate the inhibitory activity of antibiotics. Consequently, changes in the MIC of the disinfectant of several “test” strains can be measured and the resistant strains can be detected. In contrast, current standardized tests for the evaluation and comparison of commercial disinfectants measure the bactericidal activity of the products by using one specific “reference” strain; the different tests use planktonic cells (suspension test) or cells attached to stainless steel (carrier test).

Despite the low MIC values, L. monocytogenes strains with low-level resistance to QACs have efflux pumps that can reduce the intracellular concentration of the biocides to subinhibitory levels, “such that the bacterium can survive longer than may have been predicted from the MIC for that organism”. For quinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, for example, the MICs afforded by mutations in the gene encoding the target topoisomerase are too low to allow survival, and it has been proposed that efflux gives rise to low intracellular concentrations of the drugs. In addition, microorganisms in the environment may be exposed to enormously variable concentrations of QACs. For example, in domestic wastewater the average concentration of QACs is approximately 0.5 mg L-1, and in wastewater treatment plant effluents the concentration decreases to 0.05 mg L-1. As a result, low-level resistance to QACs may contribute to the persistence of L. monocytogenes in the environment.

Is Persistence Linked to Resistance?

The hypothesis that the persistence of certain subtypes of L. monocytogenes is linked to resistance to disinfectants has been investigated in numerous studies (revised by ). However, an association between low-level resistance to QACs and persistence of the pathogen in different food processing environments has been demonstrated only in a few cases.

The susceptibility of 200 strains of L. monocytogenes to BAC has been investigated in a fish production plant in Norway. In this study, 10% of the strains are resistant strains, and all of these are previously identified persistent strains (; Table 1). The relationship between persistence and resistance to two QACs has also been analyzed in four strains of poultry originating in Finland. In one of the persistent strains, the MIC values are higher (2.5–5.0 mg L-1) than the MICs for the rest of the strains (0.63–1.25 mg L-1). Additionally, the MICs of a different QAC, benzethonium chloride, have been analyzed in 11 strains of L. monocytogenes from the cheese industry in Ireland. Two of the persistent strains have MIC values of 1.5–4.0 mg L-1, compared with a MIC of 0.5 mg L-1 for the rest of the strains. In an Iberian pork processing plant in Spain, 29 different subtypes of L. monocytogenes have been identified over 3 years, and the resistance to BAC has been associated with the persistence of three subtypes of the molecular serotype 1/2a. Subsequently, in a similar plant, five different molecular subtypes have been detected in environmental samples from clean, disinfected surfaces. In these eight persistent subtypes, a low-level resistance to QACs has been confirmed. In both of these studies, the MIC values of BAC are 10–20 mg L-1 in the resistant strains and 1.25–2.5 mg L-1 in the sensitive strains (Table 1). To improve the control of L. monocytogenes in food processing environments, additional research is needed to evaluate attributes specific to resistant and persistent strains of this pathogen.

Advantages of Resistant Strains for Persisting in the Environment

The L. monocytogenes strains that have acquired mechanisms of resistance to QACs may have specific advantages over sensitive strains with regard to persisting in food processing environments. For example, the influence of residual QACs may vary in sensitive strains and resistant strains, as an optimum concentration (inhibitory) for the former may be suboptimum (subinhibitory) for the latter. This has been confirmed by in strains of L. monocytogenes resistant to BAC. When biofilm formation in the presence of BAC has been studied, only three concentrations of BAC (1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg L-1) have been identified that show different effects on the biofilm formation by the group of strains of L. monocytogenes included in the study. It was observed that certain resistant strains are able to form biofilm at 5 mg L-1, a concentration of BAC that is inhibitory for most strains. However, biofilm formation in the presence of increased concentrations of BAC may differ between resistant strains with similar MICs but different genetic determinants of BAC resistance. For example, biofilm production in the presence of BAC differs between persistent L. monocytogenes strains belonging to sequence type ST121 that have transposon Tn6188 with the gene qacH, and prfA mutants belonging to sequence type ST31 that are also persistent and resistant. Figure 1 shows the percentage of the biofilm formed in the presence of BAC relative to the biofilm formed without BAC by two representative ST31 and ST121 resistant strains. Thus, ST121 strains are able to form biofilm in the presence of BAC concentrations (5 mg L-1) higher than the MIC of sensitive strains (1.25–2.5 mg L-1) (; Figure 1). These results may help explain the persistence of the resistant ST121 strains.

Additionally, studies have shown that L. monocytogenes strains that are resistant to QACs can form biofilms faster than sensitive strains, which increases the likelihood of their survival. The expression of certain genes associated with the stress response or its regulation may also lead to an increased formation of biofilms by resistant strains. Therefore, the exposure of L. monocytogenes to subinhibitory concentrations of QACs and the consequent selection of resistant microorganisms may increase the ability of these bacteria to form biofilms and survive future treatment with high concentrations of the same compounds.

Concluding Remarks

In recent years, the evaluation of the relationship between resistance to disinfectants and persistence, have allowed researchers to identify L. monocytogenes persistent subtypes that are resistant to disinfectants. The low-level resistance to QACs that has been detected in these subtypes is not a phenotypic adaptation, but rather, it is a stable genotypic resistance that is relatively frequent in certain environments and has important implications. For example, the formation of biofilms by resistant strains in the presence of biocide concentrations that are inhibitory for the sensitive strains may undoubtedly have an effect on their environmental survival. Therefore, a better understanding of the ecological and genetic characteristics of the strains resistant to QACs is needed, as well as standardization and consensus of the techniques used to detect the resistant strains.

Author Contributions

All authors listed, have made substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 73

  1. 1.

    Aarestrup F. M. Knöchel S. Hasman H. (2007 ). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes from food products. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 4 216–221.

    Not in our library10.1089/fpd.2006.0078

  2. 2.

    Aase B. Sundheim G. Langsrud S. Rørvik L. M. (2000 ). Occurrence of and a possible mechanism for resistance to a quaternary ammonium compound in Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 62 57–63.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00357-3

  3. 3.

    Bērziņš A. Hellström S. Siliņš I. Korkeala H. (2010 ). Contamination patterns of Listeria monocytogenes in cold-smoked pork processing. J. Food Prot. 73 2103–2109.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-73.11.2103

  4. 4.

    Blair J. M. Webber M. A. Baylay A. J. Ogbolu D. O. Piddock L. J. (2015 ). Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13 42–51.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro3380

  5. 5.

    Bridier A. Briandet R. Thomas V. Dubois-Brissonnet F. (2011 ). Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants: a review. Biofouling 27 1017–1032.

    Not in our library10.1080/08927014.2011.626899

  6. 6.

    Buffet-Bataillon S. Tattevin P. Bonnaure-Mallet M. Jolivet-Gougeon A. (2012 ). Emergence of resistance to antibacterial agents: the role of quaternary ammonium compounds-a critical review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 39 381–389.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.01.011

  7. 7.

    Carpentier B. Cerf O. (2011 ). Review–persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in food industry equipment and premises. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 145 1–8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.005

  8. 8.

    CDC (2014 ). Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food — foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 U.S. sites, 2006–2013. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 63 328–332.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    CLSI (2009 ). Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. Approved Standard, 8th ed. M7-A8. Wayne, PA: CLSI.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Cramer M. M. (2006 ). Food Plant Sanitation. Design, Maintenance, and Good Manufacturing Practices. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    de Noordhout C. M. Devleesschauwer B. Angulo F. J. Verbeke G. Haagsma J. Kirk M. (2014 ). The global burden of listeriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 14 1073–1082.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(14)70870-9

  12. 12.

    Dutta V. Elhanafi D. Kathariou S. (2013 ). Conservation and distribution of the benzalkonium chloride resistance cassette bcrABC in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79 6067–6074.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.01751-13

  13. 13.

    Ebner R. Stephan R. Althaus D. Brisse S. Maury M. Tasara T. (2015 ). Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated during 2011-2014 from different food matrices in Switzerland. Food Control 57 321–326.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.030

  14. 14.

    EFSA (2008 ). Scientific opinion of the panel on biological hazards on a request from the European Food Safety Authority on foodborne antimicrobial resistance as a biological hazard. EFSA J. 765 1–87.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    EFSA and ECDC (2014 ). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2012. EFSA J. 12 3547.

    Not in our library10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500

  16. 16.

    Elhanafi D. Dutta V. Kathariou S. (2010 ). Genetic characterisation of plasmid associated benzalkonium chloride resistance determinants in a strain of Listeria monocytogenes from the 1998–1999 outbreak. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76 8231–8238.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.02056-10

  17. 17.

    EUCAST (2000 ). European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution. Definitive document E.DEF 3.1. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 6 509–515.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00142.x

  18. 18.

    European Committee for Standardisation (2010 ). European Standard EN 1276:2009/AC:2010. Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics–Quantitative Suspension Test for the Evaluation of Bactericidal Activity of Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics used in Food, Industrial, Domestic and Institutional Areas - Test Method and Requirements (phase 2, step 1). Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Fatemi P. Frank J. F. (1999 ). Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes/Pseudomonas biofilms by peracid sanitizers. J. Food Prot. 62 761–765.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-62.7.761

  20. 20.

    Ferreira V. Barbosa J. Stasiewicz M. Vongkamjan K. Moreno Switt A. Hogg T. (2011 ). Diverse geno- and phenotypes of persistent Listeria monocytogenes isolates from fermented meat sausage production facilities in Portugal. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77 2701–2715.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.02553-10

  21. 21.

    Ferreira V. Wiedmann M. Teixeira P. Stasiewicz M. J. (2014 ). Listeria monocytogenes persistence in food-associated environments: epidemiology, strain characteristics, and implications for public health. J. Food Prot. 77 150–170.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-13-150

  22. 22.

    Fox E. M. Leonard N. Jordan K. (2011 ). Physiological and transcriptional characterization of persistent and nonpersistent Listeria monocytogenes isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77 6559–6569.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.05529-11

  23. 23.

    Gandhi M. Chikindas M. L. (2007 ). Listeria: a foodborne pathogen that knows how to survive. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 113 1–15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.07.008

  24. 24.

    Garner D. Kathariou S. (2016 ). Fresh produce-associated listeriosis outbreaks, sources of concern, teachable moments, and insights. J. Food Prot. 79 337–344.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-387

  25. 25.

    Gerba C. P. (2015 ). Quaternary ammonium biocides: efficacy in application. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 464–469.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.02633-2614

  26. 26.

    Hegstad K. Langsrud S. Lunestad B. T. Scheie A. A. Sunde M. Yazdankhah S. P. (2010 ). Does the wide use of quaternary ammonium compounds enhance the selection and spread of antimicrobial resistance and thus threaten our health? Microb. Drug Resist. 16 91–104.

    Not in our library10.1089/mdr.2009.0120

  27. 27.

    Heir E. Lindstedt B. A. Røtterud O. J. Vardund T. Kapperud G. Nesbakken T. (2004 ). Molecular epidemiology and disinfectant susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes from meat processing plants and human infections. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 96 85–96.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.014

  28. 28.

    Jiang X. Yu T. Liang Y. Ji S. Guo X. Ma J. (2015 ). Efflux pump-mediated benzalkonium chloride resistance in Listeria monocytogenes isolated from retail food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 217 141–145.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.10.022

  29. 29.

    Kastbjerg V. G. Gram L. (2009 ). Model systems allowing quantification of sensitivity to disinfectants and comparison of disinfectant susceptibility of persistent and presumed nonpersistent Listeria monocytogenes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 106 1667–1681.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04134.x

  30. 30.

    Kastbjerg V. G. Gram L. (2012 ). Industrial disinfectants do not select for resistance in Listeria monocytogenes following long term exposure. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 160 11–15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.09.009

  31. 31.

    Katharios-Lanwermeyer S. Rakic-Martinez M. Elhanafi D. Ratani S. Tiedje J. M. Kathariou S. (2012 ). Coselection of cadmium and benzalkonium chloride resistance in conjugative transfers from nonpathogenic Listeria spp. to other Listeriae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78 7549–7556.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.02245-2212

  32. 32.

    Kovacevic J. Ziegler J. Wałecka-Zacharska E. Reimer A. Kitts D. D. Gilmour M. W. (2015 ). Tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes to quaternary ammonium sanitizers is mediated by a novel efflux pump encoded by emrE. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82 939–953.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.03741-15

  33. 33.

    Lemaitre J. P. Echchannaoui H. Michaut G. Divies C. Rousset A. (1998 ). Plasmid-mediated resistance to antimicrobial agents among listeriae. J. Food Protect. 61 1459–1464.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-61.11.1459

  34. 34.

    Lianou A. Sofos J. N. (2007 ). A review of the incidence and transmission of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat products in retail and food service environments. J. Food Prot. 70 2172–2198.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-70.9.2172

  35. 35.

    Liu X. Marrakchi M. Jahne M. Rogers S. Andreescu S. (2016 ). Real-time investigation of antibiotics-induced oxidative stress and superoxide release in bacteria using an electrochemical biosensor. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 91 25–33.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.12.001

  36. 36.

    Lundén J. M. Autio T. J. Markkula A. Hellström S. Korkeala H. (2003a ). Adaptive and cross-adaptive responses of persistent and nonpersistent Listeria monocytogenes strains to disinfectants. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 82 265–272.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00312-4

  37. 37.

    Lundén J. M. Autio T. J. Sjoberg A. M. Korkeala H. J. (2003b ). Persistent and nonpersistent Listeria monocytogenes contamination in meat and poultry processing plants. J. Food Prot. 66 2062–2069.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-66.11.2062

  38. 38.

    Malley T. J. Butts J. Wiedmann M. (2015 ). Seek and destroy process: Listeria monocytogenes process controls in the ready-to-eat meat and poultry industry. J. Food Prot. 78 436–445.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-13-507

  39. 39.

    McLauchlin J. Mitchell R. T. Smerdon W. J. Jewell K. (2004 ). Listeria monocytogenes and listeriosis: a review of hazard characterisation for use in microbiological risk assessment of foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 92 15–33.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00326-x

  40. 40.

    Mereghetti L. Quentin R. Mee N. Audurier A. (2000 ). Low sensitivity of Listeria monocytogenes to quaternary ammonium compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66 5083–5086.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.66.11.5083-5086.2000

  41. 41.

    Morganti M. Scaltriti E. Cozzolino P. Bolzoni L. Casadei G. Pierantoni M. (2015 ). Processing-dependent and clonal contamination patterns of Listeria monocytogenes in the cured ham food chain revealed by genetic analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82 822–831.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.03103-15

  42. 42.
  43. 43.

    Mullapudi S. Siletzky R. M. Kathariou S. (2008 ). Heavy-metal and benzalkonium chloride resistance of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from the environment of turkey-processing plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74 1464–1468.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.02426-07

  44. 44.
  45. 45.

    Nakamura H. Takakura K. Sone Y. Itano Y. Nishikawa Y. (2013 ). Biofilm formation and resistance to benzalkonium chloride in Listeria monocytogenes isolated from a fish processing plant. J. Food Prot. 76 1179–1186.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-12-225

  46. 46.

    Nakari U. M. Rantala L. Pihlajasaari A. Toikkanen S. Johansson T. Hellsten C. (2014 ). Investigation of increased listeriosis revealed two fishery production plants with persistent Listeria contamination in Finland in 2010. Epidemiol. Infect. 142 2261–2269.

    Not in our library10.1017/s095026881300349x

  47. 47.

    Norwood D. Gilmour A. (2000 ). The growth and resistance to sodium hypochlorite of Listeria monocytogenes in a steady-state multispecies biofilm. J. Appl. Microbiol. 88 512–520.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00990.x

  48. 48.
  49. 49.

    Ortiz S. (2015 ). Diversidad Genética y Persistencia Ambiental de Listeria monocytogenes En Dos Plantas de Procesado de Carne de Cerdo Ibérico: Influencia de la Resistencia a Desinfectantes de Amonio Cuaternario. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    Ortiz S. López V. Martínez-Suárez J. V. (2014a ). Control of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in an Iberian pork processing plant and selection of benzalkonium chloride-resistant strains. Food Microbiol. 39 81–88.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fm.2013.11.007

  51. 51.

    Ortiz S. López V. Martínez-Suárez J. V. (2014b ). The influence of subminimal inhibitory concentrations of benzalkonium chloride on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 189 106–112.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.007

  52. 52.

    Ortiz S. López V. Villatoro D. López P. Dávila J. C. Martínez-Suárez J. V. (2010 ). A 3-year surveillance of the genetic diversity and persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in an Iberian pig slaughterhouse and processing plant. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 7 1177–1184.

    Not in our library10.1089/fpd.2010.0535

  53. 53.

    Ortiz S. López-Alonso V. Rodríguez P. Martínez-Suárez J. V. (2016 ). The connection between persistent, disinfectant-resistant Listeria monocytogenes strains from two geographically separate Iberian pork processing plants: evidence from comparative genome analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82 308–317.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.02824-15

  54. 54.

    Pan Y. Breidt F. Jr. Kathariou S. (2006 ). Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes biofilms to sanitizing agents in a simulated food processing environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 7711–7717.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.01065-06

  55. 55.

    Piddock L. J. (2006 ). Clinically relevant chromosomally encoded multidrug resistance efflux pumps in bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19 382–402.

    Not in our library10.1128/cmr.19.2.382-402.2006

  56. 56.

    Rakic-Martinez M. Drevets D. A. Dutta V. Katic V. Kathariou S. (2011 ). Listeria monocytogenes strains selected on ciprofloxacin or the disinfectant benzalkonium chloride exhibit reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, benzalkonium chloride, and other toxic compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77 8714–8721.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.05941-11

  57. 57.

    Ratani S. S. Siletzky R. M. Dutta V. Yildirim S. Osborne J. A. Lin W. (2012 ). Heavy metal and disinfectant resistance of Listeria monocytogenes from foods and food processing plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78 6938–6945.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.01553-12

  58. 58.

    Renier S. Hébraud M. Desvaux M. (2011 ). Molecular biology of surface colonization by Listeria monocytogenes: an additional facet of an opportunistic Gram-positive foodborne pathogen. Environ. Microbiol. 13 835–850.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02378.x

  59. 59.

    Romanova N. Favrin S. Griffiths M. W. (2002 ). Sensitivity of Listeria monocytogenes to sanitizers used in the meat processing industry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 6405–6409.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.68.12.6405-6409.2002

  60. 60.

    Romanova N. A. Wolffs P. F. Brovko L. Y. Griffiths M. W. (2006 ). Role of efflux pumps in adaptation and resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to benzalkonium chloride. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 3498–3503.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.72.5.3498-3503.2006

  61. 61.

    SCENIHR (2009 ). Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. Assessment of the Antibiotic Resistance Effects of Biocides. Brussels: European Commission. Health & Consumer Protection DG.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.
  63. 63.

    Shapiro R. S. (2015 ). Antimicrobial-induced DNA damage and genomic instability in microbial pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 11:e1004678

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.ppat.1004678

  64. 64.

    Silk B. J. Date K. A. Jackson K. A. Pouillot R. Holt K. G. Graves L. M. (2012 ). Invasive listeriosis in the foodborne diseases active surveillance network (FoodNet), 2004-2009: further targeted prevention needed for higher-risk groups. Clin. Infect. Dis. 54(Suppl. 5) S396–S404.

    Not in our library10.1093/cid/cis268

  65. 65.

    Soumet C. Ragimbeau C. Maris P. (2005 ). Screening of benzalkonium chloride resistance in Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated during cold smoked fish production. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 41 291–296.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1472-765x.2005.01763.x

  66. 66.

    Stopforth J. D. Samelis J. Sofos J. N. Kendall P. A. Smith G. C. (2002 ). Biofilm formation by acid-adapted and nonadapted Listeria monocytogenes in fresh beef decontamination washings and its subsequent inactivation with sanitizers. J. Food Prot. 65 1717–1727.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-65.11.1717

  67. 67.

    Tezel U. Pavlostathis S. G. (2015 ). Quaternary ammonium disinfectants: microbial adaptation, degradation and ecology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 33 296–304.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.copbio.2015.03.018

  68. 68.

    Thévenot D. Dernburg A. Vernozy-Rozand C. (2006 ). An updated review of Listeria monocytogenes in the pork meat industry and its products. J. Appl. Microbiol. 101 7–17.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02962.x

  69. 69.

    To M. S. Favrin S. Romanova N. Griffiths M. W. (2002 ). Postadaptational resistance to benzalkonium chloride and subsequent physicochemical modifications of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 5258–5264.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.68.11.5258-5264.2002

  70. 70.

    Tompkin R. B. (2002 ). Control of Listeria monocytogenes in the food-processing environment. J. Food Prot. 65 709–725.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-65.4.709

  71. 71.

    van der Veen S. Abee T. (2010 ). Importance of SigB for Listeria monocytogenes static and continuous-flow biofilm formation and disinfectant resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76 7854–7860.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.01519-10

  72. 72.

    Xu D. Li Y. Zahid M. S. Yamasaki S. Shi L. Li J. R. (2014 ). Benzalkonium chloride and heavy-metal tolerance in Listeria monocytogenes from retail foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 190 24–30.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.017

  73. 73.

    Zhang H. Zhou Y. Bao H. Zhang L. Wang R. Zhou X. (2015 ). Plasmid-borne cadmium resistant determinants are associated with the susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes to bacteriophage. Microbiol. Res. 172 1–6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.micres.2015.01.008

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.