Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Editorial: New Challenges in Marine Pollution Monitoring

Juan Bellas, Ketil Hylland, Thierry Burgeot

Frontiers in Marine Science · 2020

doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00820 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

There is abundant evidence that anthropogenic activities have polluted all compartments of the\noceans, from the poles to the tropics, by different physical, chemical, and biological stressors.\nChemical pollution is particularly tackled here with focus on legacy pollutants and newly emerging\nman-made compounds (xenobiotics) or anthropogenic forcing in the increase of natural chemical\nsubstances. It has been estimated that more than 100,000 chemicals are currently on the market\n[ECHA (European Chemicals Agency), 2017], and thousands of new substances are being\nintroduced every year due to industrialization, intensive agriculture, and urban development. This\nhas led to a continuous flow of chemical products to the oceans that have the potential to alter the\nstructure of ecosystems by causing changes in the biotic communities that constitute them.\nTraditionally, the assessment of marine chemical pollution would exclusively be based on\nchemical analysis of a limited set of potential pollutants in selected environmental matrices, and\na comparison between their levels with those found in pristine areas not being subjected to\ndirect human pressures. However, such chemical assessment of pollution only offers a partially\nsuitable approach to the question of how marine organisms and ecosystem functioning are affected\nby pollutants. This can only be answered by means of an integrated assessment including both\nchemical analyses and biological tools that quantitatively link the levels of pollutants with their\necological effects, including new contaminants for which no analytical techniques have yet been\ndeveloped. Ideally, we aim to detect disturbances caused by pollutants before ecosystems are\naffected. So we need sensitive indications for pollution effects that provide an early warning to\nallow taking measures to avoid ecological damage. As for this concern a unique effort based on a\nEuropean consensus, has been developed by ICES/OSPAR (Davies and Vethaak, 2012).\nA new challenge in marine pollution monitoring is also based on the harmonization of two\nEuropean Union directives for the protection of the marine environment, the Water Framework\nDirective (WFD, 2000/60/CE) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD, 2008/56/CE).\nThe latter established a legislative context demanding the use of effect-based tools for the\nassessment of pollution. These two directives were constructed according to two different strategies\nto assess the status of continental and coastal water ecosystems, following either a risk assessment\napproach (WFD) or an ecosystem approach (MSFD)

Abstract licence: CC BY

References1

    1 more reference, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.