No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.
The role of intestinal microbes on intestinal barrier function and host immunity from a metabolite perspective
Yifeng Fu, Jin Lyu, Shuangshuang Wang
Frontiers in Immunology · 2023 · Review · CC BY
doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1277102
Abstract
The gut is colonized by many commensal microorganisms, and the diversity and metabolic patterns of microorganisms profoundly influence the intestinal health. These microbial imbalances can lead to disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Microorganisms produce byproducts that act as signaling molecules, triggering the immune system in the gut mucosa and controlling inflammation. For example, metabolites like short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and secondary bile acids can release inflammatory-mediated signals by binding to specific receptors. These metabolites indirectly affect host health and intestinal immunity by interacting with the intestinal epithelial and mucosal immune cells. Moreover, Tryptophan-derived metabolites also play a role in governing the immune response by binding to aromatic hydrocarbon receptors (AHR) located on the intestinal mucosa, enhancing the intestinal epithelial barrier. Dietary-derived indoles, which are synthetic precursors of AHR ligands, work together with SCFA and secondary bile acids to reduce stress on the intestinal epithelium and regulate inflammation. This review highlights the interaction between gut microbial metabolites and the intestinal immune system, as well as the crosstalk of dietary fiber intake in improving the host microbial metabolism and its beneficial effects on the organism.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
The intestine is widely recognized as the body’s foremost immune organ, with its role in communicating with food, symbiotic microbial communities, and external pathogens. To facilitate these vital connections, the gut has evolved into a highly dynamic structure with the ability to regulate both innate and adaptive immunity. However, changes in diet and lifestyle have caused extraordinary rates of gastrointestinal health issues, increasing the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) worldwide.
The host and intestinal flora maintain a reciprocal link when the organism is stable. However, achieving this balance between the commensal microbiota and mucosal immunity can be a challenging task. The microbiota mainly resides in the colon, upper digestive tract, saliva, and throat. Moreover, gut microbes play a vital role in initiating immunological activation due to their abundance when compared to human cells. The intestinal epithelium acts as a physical and chemical barrier that protects the intestinal mucosa and surrounding organs from harmful microorganisms. However, prolonged interaction between the microorganisms and the intestine may cause IBD. IBD is a chronic, recurrent inflammatory condition caused by various factors such as heredity and environmental factors. The pathology of IBD, with its fluctuating periods of deterioration and remission, presents a significant challenge in developing specific treatments against the disease.
There have been several studies confirming the impact of the gut microbes on IBD. The interaction between microbial-derived metabolites, the intestinal mucosa, and diet plays a crucial role in preventing and treating inflammatory diseases and promoting a balanced host immunity. These microbial-derived metabolites, also known as gut microbial metabolites, act as messengers, providing information to the host about the microbiome composition, the presence of pathogens, or other environmental challenges. Moreover, recent research has highlighted the significant influence of diet on the composition of the gut microbiota, ultimately affecting host health by regulating intestinal permeability and modulating both the innate and adaptive immune systems.
This review aims to detail the interactions between microbial metabolites and the intestinal mucosa, and highlight the implications of these interactions on the human immune system. Specifically, we will examine how dietary habits can promote the production of microbial metabolites, thus preventing intestinal inflammation. Additionally, this article aims to provide insights into basic research in this field.
Gut microbiota and host immunity
The gut microbiota is a diverse ecosystem comprising various microorganisms, such as bacteria, archaea, phages, eukaryotic viruses, and fungi. While bacteria have received significant attention, it is worth noting that fungal communities also play a crucial role in this ecosystem. Although they constitute only around 1% of the human gut, fungi have been found to be actively involved in the development of diseases and can significantly influence the host’s immune response. It is interesting to note that more than 1000 bacteria that colonize the gastrointestinal tract belong to the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla, which make up approximately 90% of the entire microbial community. The mechanisms by which the intestinal mucosa adapts to the various flora have not been extensively explored, but it is already highly adaptive. The developmental processes of the immune system are driven by microorganisms, and in turn, the immune system influences the composition of the gut microbiota, and changes in microorganisms indirectly affect host immunity. Infants have very little intestinal flora before birth, and after birth the microorganisms gradually colonise the intestines due to the influence of the mother and the surrounding environment, and ultimately the microorganisms reach a steady state in the host, which affects the health of the host.
Early in life, specific gut bacteria work in tandem with immune tissue surrounding the intestinal mucosa. Failure to form an appropriate microbiota at this stage can weaken the immune system, potentially leading to adverse outcomes later in life. Research has demonstrated that gut microbes can affect the recruitment of immune cells and elicit inflammation, as seen in IBD. Thus, the maintenance of intestinal immune homeostasis largely relies on the interactions between the microbiota and the intestinal epithelium. Larsen et al. conducted a study which indicated that treatment with lysozyme from the basophilic Acremonium alcalophilum during enteritis suppressed inflammation and reversed inflammation-induced changes in the intestinal microbiota. However, this protection was diminished in mice with depleted microbiota treated with antibiotics, suggesting a dependence on the microbiota for lysozyme’s anti-inflammatory impact. Additionally, Wu et al. found that Lactobacillus reuteri treatment in TNF (Tumor necrosis factor)-induced intestinal inflammation led to a decrease in TNF production, repaired gut damage by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and increased intestinal epithelial proliferation and differentiation, thereby strengthening the intestinal mucosal barrier against inflammation.
Recent studies in mice have shown that the fatty acid oxidation pathway is enhanced during a 24-hour fasting period, resulting in improved activity of intestinal stem cells. Fasting cycles have been found to alleviate intestinal inflammation and increase gut stem cells and probiotics, leading to an improvement in the inflammation-related phenotype of IBD. The therapeutic effect of probiotics on intestinal inflammation has been confirmed by multiple studies. For instance, Xiang et al. demonstrated in a mouse model of DSS (dextran sodium sulfate)-induced enteritis that treatment with Bifidobacterium breve strains H4-2 and H9-3 significantly ameliorated colon length shortening, attenuated inflammatory damage to the colon, and restored the number of mucus-secreting goblet cells. Another study investigated the effects of Bifidobacterium adolescentis treatment in mice with colitis and found that gavage administration of B. adolescentis induced the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors while reducing pro-inflammatory factors, effectively alleviating intestinal inflammation compared to the untreated mice with colitis. Furthermore, 16S rRNA sequencing of mouse feces revealed a decrease in the abundance of harmful pathogens Akkermansia and Escherichia-shigella in the B. adolescentis-treated mice.
The interaction between the host and gut microbes is essential for establishing immune tolerance and preventing harmful foreign microbes. An essential component of this interaction is the mucus layer produced by intestinal epithelial cells, which acts as a physical barrier separating the intestinal lumen from the underlying tissue. This mucus barrier regulates the immunogenicity of intestinal antigens and supports the anti-inflammatory properties of dendritic cells, contributing to immune homeostasis. Wimonrat et al. found that gavage administration of Candida resulted in more severe intestinal leakage, higher serum endotoxin levels, and dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota in mice. Additionally, Candida administration significantly increased serum levels of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6 (Interleukin-6) and TNF-α, and exacerbated intestinal inflammatory damage, which were effectively mitigated by administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus L34. Moreover, a study demonstrated that colonisation of Escherichia coli 541-15 in mice with enterocolitis effectively attenuated enterocolitis injury, decreased intestinal permeability, reduced centriole clusters in the lamina propria and epithelium, and reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory markers, lipocalin-2 and myeloperoxidase, as found in the faeces of mice colonised with E. coli 541-15. This bacterium was able to prevent colitis through inducing IL-10 (Interleukin-10) production in targeted intestinal epithelial CX3CR1+ macrophages. Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (c-Cbl) is deficient in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, mice with dendritic cell-specific deletion of c-Cbl exhibit increased susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis. Furthermore, activation of c-Cbl by intestinal fungus leads to enhanced resistance against colitis. The protective effects of commensal fungi can be attributed to c-Cbl-mediated induction of IL-10 production by dendritic cells. The role of Secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) in regulating intestinal fungal symbiosis and providing protection to patients with ulcerative colitis has been demonstrated. SIgA, an antifungal antibody produced in the gut, functions by encapsulating virulence-associated fungal morphotypes. This protective mechanism helps maintain a balanced fungal community within the intestines and contributes to the overall regulation of intestinal health in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Wang et al. discovered that zearalenone (ZEN), a fungal mycotoxin produced by Fusarium and known to cause reproductive immunotoxicity in farm animals while also posing a threat to human health through the food chain. The researchers found that recombinant Bacillus subtilis 168-expressing ZEN-degrading enzyme effectively inhibits ZEN. This inhibition leads to an increase in the production of the microbial metabolite called butyrate and a decrease in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) production. As a result, the ZEN-induced intestinal barrier toxicity is counteracted, thereby enhancing the defence mechanisms of the reproductive immunity axis. Wu et al. discovered that dietary supplementation of chickens with Enteromorpha prolifera (EP) and yeast glycoprotein (YG) not only increased the concentration of short-chain fatty acids but also elevated the abundance of beneficial bacteria in the chicken cecum. Furthermore, the researchers observed an increase in dopamine concentration specifically in the EP+YG-treated group. This finding suggests that EP + YG modulates metabolites associated with neurotransmitters and immune responses, indicating a potential role in enhancing both neurological and immunological functions.
In conclusion, intestinal microorganisms are able to have a positive impact by interacting with the intestinal mucosa as well as intestinal immune cells, with probiotics strengthening the host’s intestinal immune function, while harmful pathogens enter the surrounding tissues or bloodstream through the leaky gut and have a negative impact on the organism.
Gut microbial metabolites
Gut microbe-derived metabolites play a crucial role as mediators in affecting the growth and operation of the immune system. Additionally, these metabolites interact with intestinal immune cells to mediate immune homeostasis in the gut. Small molecule metabolites of a microbial origin have been discovered over the past ten years. These metabolites can be categorized into three main categories: Second, there are metabolites produced by the diet. Third, there are metabolites that are produced by the body and then modified by intestinal bacteria. Finally, there are metabolites that are formed autonomously by intestinal bacteria (see Figure 1 ).
Dietary fiber catabolism
Dietary fiber can be partially broken down by microorganisms in the large intestine but is not digested and absorbed in the small intestine. In the complex ecosystem of the gut, these microorganisms convert the sugars in food into metabolites that can have different health effects. The human digestive tract lacks the enzymes necessary to break down dietary fiber and polysaccharides, so it relies on specific bacteria in the colon to perform this task. The main bacterial groups responsible for breaking down dietary fiber are the thick-walled and actinomycete phyla, and only a few enzymes are involved in initiating the degradation process.
The definition of dietary fiber, as delineated by the Codex Alimentarius, characterizes it as a polymer derived from natural carbohydrates inherent in cereals and fruits or acquired through physicochemical processes involving raw materials. A distinctive feature of dietary fiber lies in its solubility, playing a pivotal role in the formation of intestinal gels. Conversely, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin are classified as insoluble dietary fibers. For example, many soluble dietary fibers (pectin and guar gum) can be found in plant cell walls. They are the main source of energy for the microorganisms of the gastrointestinal tract. Numerous soluble dietary fibers, such as pectin and guar gum, are present within plant cell walls.
Dietary fibre intake affects the composition of microorganisms to some extent, which is related to the type of food consumed, and this change affects the production of metabolites by microorganisms. Meals that have a high carbohydrate content but low dietary fiber content are linked to a higher risk of inflammation. On the other hand, people on a predominantly high dietary fiber diet have a much a lower risk of developing inflammatory diseases. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that dietary fiber has a positive impact on maintaining the immune system of the intestine. The protective effect of dietary fiber is mainly attributed to the short-chaini-inflammatory effects by inhibit fatty acids (SCFA) produced by fermentation, which are known to act on activating or inhibiting inflammation ( Figure 2 ). It is important to note that inflammation and autoimmune illness can result from dysfunction of the intestinal barrier.
SCFA are created when components like inulin and wheat are fermented by bacteria, and resistant starch is the main raw material for butyrate production. Bacteroidetes create acetate and propionate, while Firmicutes control the formation of butyrate. Lactic acid is produced by Bifidobacterium, a type of actinomyces, during the breakdown of dietary fiber. Butyrate, an anti-inflammatory substance, has a powerful ability to reduce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, butyrate enhances intestinal integrity and barrier function by inducing the relocation of ZO-1 (Zonula Occludens-1) and occludin in the cell membrane and increasing the expression of claudin-1 (tight junction protein 1).
SCFA and receptors
Of the SCFA produced by the fermentation of dietary fiber, acetate, propionate, and butyrate are the predominant SCFA, accounting for approximately 95% of the total SCFA concentration. These SCFA serve as a source of energy for colon cells and also play a crucial role in regulating cholesterol synthesis and glucose metabolism. Moreover, SCFA have been found to improve intestinal barrier function through various mechanisms such as inhibiting pathogen development, reducing intestinal inflammation, and modulating the structure of Tight junctions (TJ). SCFA facilitates the formation of TJ proteins and enhances the intestinal epithelial barrier function.
SCFA is detected by a broad collection of human genes that encode protein receptors called GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors). These receptors include GPR41 (FFAR3), GPR42, GPR43 (FFAR2), GPR109A (HCAR2), GPR164 (OR51E1), and OR51E2. The GPCR family of receptors inhibits the activation of NF-κB in immune cells and intestinal epithelial cells. Among the GPCRs, FFAR2 receptors are involved in the β-inhibitor-protein-2 mediated signalling pathway and generate anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting NF-κB. In addition, GPR41 and GPR43 play a crucial role in monitoring immunity to microorganisms in the intestinal mucosa, while GPR109A, which is a tumor suppressor, inhibits the activation of NF-κB. TNF-α levels or a reduction in the presence of butyric acid-producing bacteria could be the result of the downregulation of MCT1 (Monocarboxylate transporter 1) expression in the mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis. This indicates that butyric acid reduces GPR109A-mediated expression of IL-8 (Interleukin-8). Moreover, GPR43 regulates immune cells, and NLRP3 (NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain associated protein 3) inflammatory vesicles are activated through GPR41 and GPR43, resulting in IL-1β (interleukin-1β) and IL-18 (interleukin-18) secretion that influences inflammation.
Neutrophils, which are a type of immune cell, are known for their high levels of FFAR2 expression. In the context of IBD, neutrophils play a role in its pathogenesis. They can migrate to the lamina propria and epithelium to eliminate antigens, thus making a contribution to intestinal homeostasis and the recovery from IBD. The maintenance of immune homeostasis requires the regulation of FFAR2, which is strongly expressed in colonic epithelial cells and T regulatory (Treg) cells, by SCFA.
The role of SCFA in regulating glucose metabolism disorders is also noteworthy. A study conducted on diabetic patients revealed that long-term infusion of propionate into the colon was successful in improving the weight of overweight adults and preventing complications associated with insulin resistance. Furthermore, the GPR43-mediated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway was found to increase AKT (phosphokinase B) phosphorylation in specific hepatocytes, thus influencing diabetes management.
The main source of energy is butyrate, which controls inflammation and gene expression. A study has shown that butyrate is beneficial to the lumen of the intestine at low concentrations, while too high concentrations can damage the intestinal barrier. Excessive concentrations of SCFA have been found to cause mucosal damage in rats, but this damage disappears with the maturation of the mucosa. It has been proposed that high butyrate concentrations are harmful for the formation of TJ and the intestinal barrier, whereas low butyrate concentrations in Caco-2 cells (human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells) make it easier for TJ to form during the AMPK-mediated processes. The mechanism by which butyrate affects inflammation involves histone acetylation. Butyrate is the most effective inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC), which also promotes the transcription of specific genes that support intestinal homeostasis in the colon. Butyrate is taken up by MCT1 and SMCT1 (Sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1) at the top of the intestinal epithelium or immune cells through non-ionic diffusion.
SCFA mediate the inflammatory processes by interacting with receptors. However, the effects of butyrate on mucosal homeostasis can vary and are subject to context-dependent regulation. For example, low concentrations of butyrate promote the formation of TJ through AMPK-mediated processes. Conversely, studies have shown high levels of butyrate can damage the intestinal barrier, possibly by inhibiting the formation of tight junctions. Additionally, it has been found that butyrate can regulate gene expression by inhibiting HDAC. Overall, the interaction between SCFA and mucosal immunity is complex and deserves further investigation to gain insights into health and disease.
Bile acid metabolism
Bile acids (BA) are steroid molecules produced by cholesterol in liver cells. These BA molecules are transported in the small intestine and undergo uncoupling by microbial bile salt hydrolase (BSH). Once uncoupled, the BA is reabsorbed in the ileum through an apical sodium-dependent BA transporter protein. The conversion of primary BA to secondary BA primarily occurs through the 7α-hydroxylation reaction, which is catalyzed by bacteria like Clostridium perfringens and eubacteria.
BA metabolism involves two main pathways, the ‘classical’ and ‘alternative’ pathways. In the ‘classical’ pathway, cholesterol-7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) converts cholesterol to 7α-OH-cholesterol. In the ‘alternative’ pathway, cholesterol is hydroxylated by sterol 27 hydroxylase (CYP27A1). The main mode of microbial BA conversion in humans is the conversion of primary BA to secondary BA via 7α-hydroxylation reactions. These pathways ultimately produce two primary BAs: bile acid and Chenodeoxycholic acid. BA and Chenodeoxycholic acid further form conjugated bile salts by combining with glycine or taurine. Ultimately BAs affect host immunity, as shown in Figure 3.
BA bound to glycine or taurine is amphiphilic, meaning that it has both hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions. This quality helps to increase the susceptibility of dietary triglycerides to lipase and thereby promotes efficient fat absorption in the small intestine. Although a minor portion of the BA enters the colon, where it is digested and regulated by intestinal microbes for BA production, the majority of the BA is absorbed in the ileum and circulates to the liver. Importantly, the daily BA production in a healthy human body is diet-dependent, and BA levels normally remain stable between 200-600 mg. Despite this, the link between BA and certain diseases has led to increased attention on gut microbe-mediated BA metabolism.
Many bacteria play a role in the uncoupling of BA, but BSH-encoding species are limited to lactobacillus, bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, and clostridium. The abundance of BSH in gram-positive bacteria is particularly noteworthy. The close correlation between gut microbial BA metabolism and gastrointestinal health has gained significant research attention. Therefore, scholarly interest to investigate the connection between microbes and BA will contribute to a better understanding of liver and colonic diseases.
Secondary BA and receptors
FXR, the vitamin D receptor (VDR), and PXR are powerful secondary BA receptors that can bind secondary BA. The activation of microbial G protein-coupled BA receptors 1 (TGR5) by secondary BA has been found to be involved in the regulation of BA synthesis and metabolism. Although TGR5 is expressed in a variety of cells, it is mainly found in macrophages and monocytes, and it is activated by bacterial antigens. In the absence of the BA-activated receptors FXR, TGR5, PXR, and VDR, the intestinal barrier becomes compromised and disturbed, allowing the translocation of bacteria. Thus, investigating the interplay between the BA-activated receptors and bacteria may provide insights into intestinal permeability and dysfunction, as well as immunological and metabolic diseases.
The BA metabolism of FXR involves the inhibitory effect of BA synthesis inhibition, which is mediated by CYP7A1. This step takes place in the hepatocellular bile salt export pump and induces small heterodimeric chaperone (SHP) expression. SHP inactivates liver homologous receptor-1 (LRH-1), which represses CYP7A1 expression. Additionally, LRH-1 can inhibit CYP7A1 expression. Thus, the interaction between these molecules plays a crucial role in BA metabolism. Moreover, gut immune responses driven by gut microbes are modulated by FXR in response to inflammation. These immune responses may be associated with dysbiosis or dysregulation of BA metabolism. Further investigation into the relationship between bile acid metabolism and gut immune responses may provide insights into the mechanisms underlying these complex processes.
It has been shown that PXR acts as a sensor for LCA and can reduce the gene expression of LCA to minimize damage to the host, which is necessary to balance the intestinal barrier and inflammatory homeostasis. Patients suffering from intestinal inflammation exhibit lower levels of bile salts as well as lower secondary and higher BA levels in the organism compared to normal subjects. To further understand the impact of secondary BA deficiency on enterocolitis, experiments conducted by Sidhartha R et al. demonstrated that patients with ulcerative colitis have significantly lower expression of BA-inducible genes, these genes are responsible for the critical 7α-hydroxylation reaction, which converts primary BA to secondary BA. Additionally, Wang et al. conducted a study on the effect of a high-fat diet (HFD) on colitis in wild-type mice. They found that the HFD increased levels of goose deoxycholic acid, leading to macrophage activation and the initiation of colonic inflammation. In a mouse model of colitis, the mRNA expression of FXR, a key regulator of BA metabolism, was found to be downregulated in the intestinal mucosa of mice with an inflammatory phenotype. This demonstrates a potential association between FXR and the onset of IBD. Moreover, the deletion of FXR in mice prevents remission of enteritis due to the accumulation of inflammatory cells, as well as the stimulatory effect of NF-κB on intestinal microbial-lipopolysaccharide.
Gut microbes can activate TGR5, which impacts the expression of enteroendocrine cells involved in immune regulation and anti-inflammation. This, in turn, directly influences macrophage polarization and the subsequent inflammatory response. Activation of TGR5 also leads to the production of the hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and controls glucose metabolism. Once TGR5 is activated, BA suppress the production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 (Interleukin-1), IL-6, and TNF-α. The pro-inflammatory properties of TGR5 can be modulated by BSH-containing bacteria that cause the dissociation of taurine or glycine from BA.Additionally, both vitamin D deficiency and down-regulation of VDR expression are risk factors for the increased incidence of intestinal inflammation.
Tryptophan catabolism
Tryptophan, an essential amino acid, is naturally found in a variety of foods including poultry, milk, tuna, fish, cheese, bread, oats, plums, chocolate, and peanuts. Upon ingestion, tryptophan undergoes catabolism through three distinct pathways: the indole pathway, created by microorganisms in the intestine; the 5-hydroxytryptamine pathway, produced by chromophores in the intestine; and the kynurenine pathway, produced by immune cells and the intestinal mucosa.
In mammalian cells, the kynurenine pathway is initiated via tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1). IDO1 is abundantly expressed in the gut and is connected to immune control, making it the most important tryptophan metabolizing enzyme for immune function. IDO1 activation is induced by the body’s inflammatory response and the release of inflammatory cytokines. This activation acts to prevent excessive inflammatory responses. Upon initiating the kynurenine synthesis pathway, IDO1 and TDO produce formylkynurenine, which is then converted to kynurenine by kynurenine formamidase. Kynurenine itself can be further transformed by kynurenine transaminase into kynurenic acid, by kynureninase into anthranilic acid, or by kynurenine monooxygenase into 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HK).
Impaired canine urine pathways have been found to be associated with immune disorders. The conversion of tryptophan to serotonin is catalyzed by the enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH), followed by the conversion of 5-hydroxytryptophan to serotonin by 5-hydroxytryptophan decarboxylase, the specific mechanism is shown in the Figure 4. Monoamine oxidase (MAO) then changes serotonin to 5-hydroxyindoleacetaldehyde, which is further converted to 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid.
The gut microbiota can convert tryptophan into various metabolites, including indole, tryptamine, indole ethanol, indole propionic acid, indole lactic acid, indole acetic acid, faecal odorant, indole aldehyde, and indole acrylic acid. The production of these metabolites is dependent on the presence of specific catalytic enzymes unique to different bacterial species. Bacteria interact with each other to generate these metabolites, as demonstrated in Table 1.
Bacteria such as Enterococcus faecalis and E. coli have the ability to convert tryptophan into indole, which is essential for biofilm formation and can also regulate bacterial motility. Additionally, these bacteria can generate resistance to non-indole-producing species. In the intestines, the conversion of tryptophan by intestinal bacteria results in the production of tryptamine, indole pyruvic acid, indole-3-glyoxylic acid, and indole-3-lactic acid. Specifically, indole can be produced by thick-walled phyla like Enterobacter aerogenes and E. coli, as well as some members of the phylum Bacteroidetes.
Tryptophan metabolites produced by bacteria show limited affinity for AHR. Among them, indole, fecal odorant, tryptamine, indolepropionic acid (IPA), and indole-3-acetamide have the highest affinity. Reduced dietary intake of tryptophan leads an increased susceptibility of mice to adverse effects of inflammation induction. Furthermore, Tryptophan also exhibits regulatory functions in organ development, neurophysiology, and metabolic disorders. Tryptophan metabolites play an important role in host immunoprotection as shown in Figure 5.
Indoles and AHR
The tryptophan-AHR route is a mechanism in which indole can bind to and activate AHR. AHR is a ligand-activated transcription factor that functions as a receptor for many environmental toxins in the immune system.
AHR plays a crucial role in immunity by interacting with various regulatory and signaling proteins, such as PAS heterodimerization partners, AHR nuclear translocator (ARNT), and chaperone and immunophilin-like proteins, including Heat Shock Protein-90 (HSP90) and AHR-Interacting Protein p23 (AIP). Upon binding with ligands in the cytoplasm, AHR undergoes a conformational change which results in the exposure of a nuclear localization signal (NLS). This change leads to the release of HSP90 from the complex and allows the receptor to translocate to the nucleus, where it forms a heterodimer with ARNT. This activated heterodimer then binds to the xenobiotic response element (XRE) and alters expression of genes controlled by enhancer XREs. Once in the nucleus, AHR quickly forms a heterodimer with ARNT and jointly regulates the expression of downstream target genes, such as the drug metabolizing enzyme cytochrome oxidase 450 1A1 (CYP1A1) ( Figure 6 ).
Tryptophan is produced through several metabolic pathways and acts as a ligand for AHR. When these ligands bind to AHR, they can activate downstream target gene expression, such as the expression of IL-22 and IL-17 (Interleukin-17).
The AHR is a vital regulatory protein that interacts with various chaperone and immunophilin-like proteins to carry out its activity. Once bound to a ligand, changes in the NLS activate the AHR, prompting it to enter the nucleus. There, the activated AHR binds to ARNT to form a heterodimer that controls the expression of downstream target genes. Studies conducted in mice have shown that macrophages from AHR-deficient animals express lower levels of IL-10, while macrophages from AHR-overexpressing mice produce much higher levels of IL-10.
Activation of the tryptophan-AHR pathway is essential for maintaining normal function of the intestinal mucosal barrier. In colitis induced by DSS, expression of key TJ proteins, such as ZO-1, claudin-1, and occludin, is dramatically reduced. However, treatment with the endogenous AHR ligand, 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ), significantly elevates the expression of these TJ proteins. FICZ is a tryptophan photochemical product that activates AHR and promotes the synthesis of transforming growth factor (TGF), IL-6, and IL-23 (Interleukin-23). These cytokines enhance the release of IL-22, which plays a critical role in reducing inflammation and differentiation of Th17 cells. Inflammatory mediators, such as interferon (IFN) and TNF-α, which are linked to the etiology of IBD, have an impact on the function of TJ. However, activation of the tryptophan-AHR pathway prevents the activation of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and phosphorylated MLC (pMLC) signaling pathways, leading to the elimination of TNF-α/IFN-γ induced barrier dysfunction in the intestinal mucosa.
The study by M. Jennis et al. showed that IPA improved the impaired barrier function of monolayer intestinal epithelial cells in humans. Additionally, it was found that IPA positively influences the intestinal barrier, inflammatory response, and differentiation of goblet cells in rodents. More recently, Canaan M et al. conducted a study on mice with enteropathy, where they found that administration of indole and indomethacin reduced intestinal damage and maintained normal crypt depth and submucosal thickness. Furthermore, they observed that the administration of indole with indomethacin reduced the infiltration of neutrophils and prevented the destruction of tryptophan metabolites, resulting in attenuated changes in the pro-inflammatory mucosal transcriptome. It has been shown that bacteria deficient in metabolizing tryptophan affect the immune regulation of IL-22, and the production of IL-22 in patients with IBD is reduced. In studies of inflammatory patients, changes affecting the IL-22 production pathway have been identified in mice lacking the Card9 gene sensing C-type lectins, making them prone to colitis.
The above evidence suggests that the combination of indole and AHR affects the immune process by activating target gene expression and regulating inflammatory factors.
Conclusion
Gut microbes have been extensively studied and have been shown to play a pivotal role in influencing gut health and organismal immunity. To prevent and treat intestinal diseases more effectively, it is essential to have a thorough understanding of the interactions among gut microbial metabolites, the interacting receptors, and transcriptional regulatory metabolites. The production of SCFA generated by the fermentation of dietary fiber and the secondary BA that are produced by bacterially catalyzed 7-hydroxylation reactions can effectively reduce inflammation. Moreover, activation of the tryptophan-AHR pathway is crucial for maintaining the normal functioning of the gut mucosal barrier and significantly reduces its dysfunction caused by pro-inflammatory factors. Additionally, a diet rich in dietary fiber plays a vital role in preventing inflammatory diseases. Therefore, focusing on these interactions can provide a potential for more in-depth investigations to unearth mechanisms underlying gut microbial-host interactions.
Although numerous studies have investigated the impact of gut microbial metabolites on host immunity, much of this relationship remains elusive. The precise mechanism by which SCFA promote the formation of TJ proteins and enhance the function of the intestinal epithelial barrier is still unknown. Additionally, the underlying mechanisms through which IPA improves impaired intestinal epithelial barrier function require further investigation. It is worth noting that certain studies have indicated that high concentrations of butyrate can be detrimental to the intestinal barrier, while low concentrations of butyrate are beneficial for its function. Consequently, it is essential to explore whether an excess of SCFA in the intestine can indeed prove harmful to the intestinal barrier, thus reconciling this apparent contradiction. Clarifying this aspect would necessitate additional research efforts.
Author contributions
YF: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SW: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.
References 156
- 1.
Gu M Samuelson DR de la Rua NM Charles TP Taylor CM Luo M. Host innate and adaptive immunity shapes the gut microbiota biogeography. Microbiol Immunol (2022 ) 66(6):330–41
Not in our library10.1111/1348-0421.12963
- 2.
Weng YJ Gan HY Li X Huang Y Li ZC Deng HM. Correlation of diet, microbiota and metabolite networks in inflammatory bowel disease. J Dig Dis (2019 ) 20(9):447–59
Not in our library10.1111/1751-2980.12795
- 3.
Rempel J Grover K El-Matary W. Micronutrient deficiencies and anemia in children with inflammatory bowel disease. Nutrients (2021 ) 13(1):236
Not in our library10.3390/nu13010236
- 4.
Sun Y Yuan S Chen X Sun J Kalla R Yu L. The contribution of genetic risk and lifestyle factors in the development of adult-onset inflammatory bowel disease: A prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol (2023 ) 118(3):511–22
Not in our library10.14309/ajg.0000000000002180
- 5.
Kitamoto S Nagao-Kitamoto H Jiao Y Gillilland MG 3rd Hayashi A Imai J. The intermucosal connection between the mouth and gut in commensal pathobiont-driven colitis. Cell (2020 ) 182(2):447–62.e14
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.048
- 6.
Wu J Peters BA Dominianni C Zhang Y Pei Z Yang L. Cigarette smoking and the oral microbiome in a large study of American adults. Isme J (2016 ) 10(10):2435–46
Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2016.37
- 7.
Vogtmann E Flores R Yu G Freedman ND Shi J Gail MH. Association between tobacco use and the upper gastrointestinal microbiome among Chinese men. Cancer Causes Control. (2015 ) 26(4):581–8
Not in our library10.1007/s10552-015-0535-2
- 8.
Almradi A Hanzel J Sedano R Parker CE Feagan BG Ma C. Clinical trials of IL-12/IL-23 inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease. BioDrugs (2020 ) 34(6):713–21
Not in our library10.1007/s40259-020-00451-w
- 9.
Lacerda JF Lagos AC Carolino E Silva-Herdade AS Silva M Sousa Guerreiro C. Functional food components, intestinal permeability and inflammatory markers in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Nutrients (2021 ) 13(2):642
Not in our library10.3390/nu13020642
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
Wang MX Lin L Chen YD Zhong YP Lin YX Li P. Evodiamine has therapeutic efficacy in ulcerative colitis by increasing Lactobacillus acidophilus levels and acetate production. Pharmacol Res (2020 ) 159:104978
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104978
- 14.
Xu M Shen Y Cen M Zhu Y Cheng F Tang L. Modulation of the gut microbiota-farnesoid X receptor axis improves deoxycholic acid-induced intestinal inflammation in mice. J Crohns Colitis. (2021 ) 15(7):1197–210
Not in our library10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab003
- 15.
Michaudel C Danne C Agus A Magniez A Aucouturier A Spatz M. Rewiring the altered tryptophan metabolism as a novel therapeutic strategy in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut (2023 ) 72(7):1296–307
Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327337
- 16.
Martin KS Azzolini M Lira Ruas J. The kynurenine connection: how exercise shifts muscle tryptophan metabolism and affects energy homeostasis, the immune system, and the brain. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2020 ) 318(5):C818–c30
Not in our library10.1152/ajpcell.00580.2019
- 17.
Lee JY Cevallos SA Byndloss MX Tiffany CR Olsan EE Butler BP. High-fat diet and antibiotics cooperatively impair mitochondrial bioenergetics to trigger dysbiosis that exacerbates pre-inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Host Microbe (2020 ) 28(2):273–84.e6
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.001
- 18.
Fan Y Pedersen O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol (2021 ) 19(1):55–71
Not in our library10.1038/s41579-020-0433-9
- 19.
Lai S Yan Y Pu Y Lin S Qiu JG Jiang BH. Enterotypes of the human gut mycobiome. Microbiome (2023 ) 11(1):179
Not in our library10.1186/s40168-023-01586-y
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
Van Averbeke V Berkell M Mysara M Rodriguez-Ruiz JP Xavier BB De Winter FHR. Host immunity influences the composition of murine gut microbiota. Front Immunol (2022 ) 13:828016
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2022.828016
- 23.
Vacca M Raspini B Calabrese FM Porri D De Giuseppe R Chieppa M. The establishment of the gut microbiota in 1-year-aged infants: from birth to family food. Eur J Nutr (2022 ) 61(5):2517–30
Not in our library10.1007/s00394-022-02822-1
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
Becattini S Sorbara MT Kim SG Littmann EL Dong Q Walsh G. Rapid transcriptional and metabolic adaptation of intestinal microbes to host immune activation. Cell Host Microbe (2021 ) 29(3):378–93.e5
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2021.01.003
- 31.
Larsen IS Jensen BAH Bonazzi E Choi BSY Kristensen NN Schmidt EGW. Fungal lysozyme leverages the gut microbiota to curb DSS-induced colitis. Gut Microbes (2021 ) 13(1):1988836
Not in our library10.1080/19490976.2021.1988836
- 32.
Wu H Xie S Miao J Li Y Wang Z Wang M. Lactobacillus reuteri maintains intestinal epithelial regeneration and repairs damaged intestinal mucosa. Gut Microbes (2020 ) 11(4):997–1014
Not in our library10.1080/19490976.2020.1734423
- 33.
Rangan P Choi I Wei M Navarrete G Guen E Brandhorst S. Fasting-mimicking diet modulates microbiota and promotes intestinal regeneration to reduce inflammatory bowel disease pathology. Cell Rep (2019 ) 26(10):2704–19.e6
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.019
- 34.
Mihaylova MM Cheng CW Cao AQ Tripathi S Mana MD Bauer-Rowe KE. Fasting activates fatty acid oxidation to enhance intestinal stem cell function during homeostasis and aging. Cell Stem Cell (2018 ) 22(5):769–78.e4
Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2018.04.001
- 35.
Bell HN Rebernick RJ Goyert J Singhal R Kuljanin M Kerk SA. Reuterin in the healthy gut microbiome suppresses colorectal cancer growth through altering redox balance. Cancer Cell (2022 ) 40(2):185–200.e6
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2021.12.001
- 36.
- 37.
Niu MM Guo HX Cai JW Meng XC. Bifidobacterium breve alleviates DSS-induced colitis in mice by maintaining the mucosal and epithelial barriers and modulating gut microbes. Nutrients (2022 ) 14(18):3671
Not in our library10.3390/nu14183671
- 38.
- 39.
Mowat AM. To respond or not to respond - a personal perspective of intestinal tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol (2018 ) 18(6):405–15
Not in our library10.1038/s41577-018-0002-x
- 40.
- 41.
Shan M Gentile M Yeiser JR Walland AC Bornstein VU Chen K. Mucus enhances gut homeostasis and oral tolerance by delivering immunoregulatory signals. Sci (New York NY). (2013 ) 342(6157):447–53
Not in our library10.1126/science.1237910
- 42.
Panpetch W Hiengrach P Nilgate S Tumwasorn S Somboonna N Wilantho A. Additional Candida albicans administration enhances the severity of dextran sulfate solution induced colitis mouse model through leaky gut-enhanced systemic inflammation and gut-dysbiosis but attenuated by Lactobacillus rhamnosus L34. Gut Microbes (2020 ) 11(3):465–80
Not in our library10.1080/19490976.2019.1662712
- 43.
Zegarra Ruiz DF Kim DV Norwood K Saldana-Morales FB Kim M Ng C. Microbiota manipulation to increase macrophage IL-10 improves colitis and limits colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Gut Microbes (2022 ) 14(1):2119054
Not in our library10.1080/19490976.2022.2119054
- 44.
Duan JL He HQ Yu Y Liu T Ma SJ Li F. E3 ligase c-Cbl regulates intestinal inflammation through suppressing fungi-induced noncanonical NF-κB activation. Sci Adv (2021 ) 7(19):eabe5171
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.abe5171
- 45.
Doron I Mesko M Li XV Kusakabe T Leonardi I Shaw DG. Mycobiota-induced IgA antibodies regulate fungal commensalism in the gut and are dysregulated in Crohn’s disease. Nat Microbiol (2021 ) 6(12):1493–504
Not in our library10.1038/s41564-021-00983-z
- 46.
- 47.
Wassie T Cheng B Zhou T Gao L Lu Z Xie C. Microbiome-metabolome analysis reveals alterations in the composition and metabolism of caecal microbiota and metabolites with dietary Enteromorpha polysaccharide and Yeast glycoprotein in chickens. Front Immunol (2022 ) 13:996897
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2022.996897
- 48.
Hold GL. Gastrointestinal microbiota and colon cancer. Dig Dis (2016 ) 34(3):244–50
Not in our library10.1159/000443358
- 49.
Yang W Cong Y. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites in the regulation of host immune responses and immune-related inflammatory diseases. Cell Mol Immunol (2021 ) 18(4):866–77
Not in our library10.1038/s41423-021-00661-4
- 50.
Sanders ME Merenstein DJ Reid G Gibson GR Rastall RA. Probiotics and prebiotics in intestinal health and disease: from biology to the clinic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol hepatol (2019 ) 16(10):605–16
Not in our library10.1038/s41575-019-0173-3
- 51.
Alfa MJ Strang D Tappia PS Graham M Van Domselaar G Forbes JD. A randomized trial to determine the impact of a digestion resistant starch composition on the gut microbiome in older and mid-age adults. Clin Nutr (2018 ) 37(3):797–807
Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2017.03.025
- 52.
- 53.
Makki K Deehan EC Walter J Bäckhed F. The impact of dietary fiber on gut microbiota in host health and disease. Cell Host Microbe (2018 ) 23(6):705–15
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.012
- 54.
Reichardt N Vollmer M Holtrop G Farquharson FM Wefers D Bunzel M. Specific substrate-driven changes in human faecal microbiota composition contrast with functional redundancy in short-chain fatty acid production. Isme J (2018 ) 12(2):610–22
Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2017.196
- 55.
- 56.
- 57.
- 58.
Zhao J Zhang X Liu H Brown MA Qiao S. Dietary protein and gut microbiota composition and function. Curr Protein Pept sci (2019 ) 20(2):145–54
Not in our library10.2174/1389203719666180514145437
- 59.
Sun M Wu W Liu Z Cong Y. Microbiota metabolite short chain fatty acids, GPCR, and inflammatory bowel diseases. J Gastroenterol (2017 ) 52(1):1–8
Not in our library10.1007/s00535-016-1242-9
- 60.
Michael OS Dibia CL Soetan OA Adeyanju OA Oyewole AL Badmus OO. Sodium acetate prevents nicotine-induced cardiorenal dysmetabolism through uric acid/creatine kinase-dependent pathway. Life Sci (2020 ) 257:118127
Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118127
- 61.
Sugita K Kabashima K. Tight junctions in the development of asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, atopic dermatitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and inflammatory bowel diseases. J Leukoc Biol (2020 ) 107(5):749–62
Not in our library10.1002/jlb.5mr0120-230r
- 62.
Peng L Li ZR Green RS Holzman IR Lin J. Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Nutr (2009 ) 139(9):1619–25
Not in our library10.3945/jn.109.104638
- 63.
Xia W Khan I Li XA Huang G Yu Z Leong WK. Adaptogenic flower buds exert cancer preventive effects by enhancing the SCFA-producers, strengthening the epithelial tight junction complex and immune responses. Pharmacol Res (2020 ) 159:104809
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104809
- 64.
Martin-Gallausiaux C Marinelli L Blottière HM Larraufie P Lapaque N. SCFA: mechanisms and functional importance in the gut. Proc Nutr Soc (2021 ) 80(1):37–49
Not in our library10.1017/s0029665120006916
- 65.
Kellow NJ Coughlan MT Reid CM. Metabolic benefits of dietary prebiotics in human subjects: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr (2014 ) 111(7):1147–61
Not in our library10.1017/s0007114513003607
- 66.
- 67.
Thangaraju M Cresci GA Liu K Ananth S Gnanaprakasam JP Browning DD. GPR109A is a G-protein-coupled receptor for the bacterial fermentation product butyrate and functions as a tumor suppressor in colon. Cancer Res (2009 ) 69(7):2826–32
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4466
- 68.
Thibault R De Coppet P Daly K Bourreille A Cuff M Bonnet C. Down-regulation of the monocarboxylate transporter 1 is involved in butyrate deficiency during intestinal inflammation. Gastroenterology (2007 ) 133(6):1916–27
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.041
- 69.
Nancey S Blanvillain E Parmentier B Flourié B Bayet C Bienvenu J. Infliximab treatment does not induce organ-specific or nonorgan-specific autoantibodies other than antinuclear and anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibodies in Crohn’s disease. Inflammation Bowel Dis (2005 ) 11(11):986–91
Not in our library10.1097/01.mib.0000186408.07769.78
- 70.
Mangan MSJ Olhava EJ Roush WR Seidel HM Glick GD Latz E. Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discovery (2018 ) 17(8):588–606
Not in our library10.1038/nrd.2018.97
- 71.
- 72.
- 73.
Serino M. Molecular paths linking metabolic diseases, gut microbiota dysbiosis and enterobacteria infections. J Mol Biol (2018 ) 430(5):581–90
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2018.01.010
- 74.
Jang HR Lee HY. Mechanisms linking gut microbial metabolites to insulin resistance. World J diabetes. (2021 ) 12(6):730–44
Not in our library10.4239/wjd.v12.i6.730
- 75.
- 76.
Nafday SM Chen W Peng L Babyatsky MW Holzman IR Lin J. Short-chain fatty acids induce colonic mucosal injury in rats with various postnatal ages. Pediatr Res (2005 ) 57(2):201–4
Not in our library10.1203/01.pdr.0000150721.83224.89
- 77.
Peng L He Z Chen W Holzman IR Lin J. Effects of butyrate on intestinal barrier function in a Caco-2 cell monolayer model of intestinal barrier. Pediatr Res (2007 ) 61(1):37–41
Not in our library10.1203/01.pdr.0000250014.92242.f3
- 78.
Donohoe DR Collins LB Wali A Bigler R Sun W Bultman SJ. The Warburg effect dictates the mechanism of butyrate-mediated histone acetylation and cell proliferation. Mol Cell (2012 ) 48(4):612–26
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.033
- 79.
- 80.
Macfarlane S Macfarlane GT. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proc Nutr Soc (2003 ) 62(1):67–72
Not in our library10.1079/pns2002207
- 81.
Cross TL Kasahara K Rey FE. Sexual dimorphism of cardiometabolic dysfunction: Gut microbiome in the play? Mol Metab (2018 ) 15:70–81
Not in our library10.1016/j.molmet.2018.05.016
- 82.
- 83.
Kanaley JA Colberg SR Corcoran MH Malin SK Rodriguez NR Crespo CJ. Exercise/physical activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A consensus statement from the american college of sports medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2022 ) 54(2):353–68
Not in our library10.1249/mss.0000000000002800
- 84.
Ridlon JM Kang DJ Hylemon PB. Isolation and characterization of a bile acid inducible 7alpha-dehydroxylating operon in Clostridium hylemonae TN271. Anaerobe (2010 ) 16(2):137–46
Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.05.004
- 85.
Chiang JY. Bile acids: regulation of synthesis. J Lipid Res (2009 ) 50(10):1955–66
Not in our library10.1194/jlr.r900010-jlr200
- 86.
Fiorucci S Carino A Baldoni M Santucci L Costanzi E Graziosi L. Bile acid signaling in inflammatory bowel diseases. Dig Dis Sci (2021 ) 66(3):674–93
Not in our library10.1007/s10620-020-06715-3
- 87.
Withers DR Hepworth MR Wang X Mackley EC Halford EE Dutton EE. Transient inhibition of ROR-γt therapeutically limits intestinal inflammation by reducing TH17 cells and preserving group 3 innate lymphoid cells. Nat Med (2016 ) 22(3):319–23
Not in our library10.1038/nm.4046
- 88.
Ocvirk S O’Keefe SJD. Dietary fat, bile acid metabolism and colorectal cancer. Semin Cancer Biol (2021 ) 73:347–55
Not in our library10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.10.003
- 89.
Sun L Xie C Wang G Wu Y Wu Q Wang X. Gut microbiota and intestinal FXR mediate the clinical benefits of metformin. Nat Med (2018 ) 24(12):1919–29
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-018-0222-4
- 90.
Fiorucci S Distrutti E Carino A Zampella A Biagioli M. Bile acids and their receptors in metabolic disorders. Prog Lipid Res (2021 ) 82:101094
Not in our library10.1016/j.plipres.2021.101094
- 91.
Monte MJ Marin JJ Antelo A Vazquez-Tato J. Bile acids: chemistry, physiology, and pathophysiology. World J Gastroenterol (2009 ) 15(7):804–16
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.15.804
- 92.
de Aguiar Vallim TQ Tarling EJ Edwards PA. Pleiotropic roles of bile acids in metabolism. Cell Metab (2013 ) 17(5):657–69
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.013
- 93.
Sayin SI Wahlström A Felin J Jäntti S Marschall HU Bamberg K. Gut microbiota regulates bile acid metabolism by reducing the levels of tauro-beta-muricholic acid, a naturally occurring FXR antagonist. Cell Metab (2013 ) 17(2):225–35
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2013.01.003
- 94.
Long SL Gahan CGM Joyce SA. Interactions between gut bacteria and bile in health and disease. Mol Aspects Med (2017 ) 56:54–65
Not in our library10.1016/j.mam.2017.06.002
- 95.
Jones BV Begley M Hill C Gahan CG Marchesi JR. Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2008 ) 105(36):13580–5
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0804437105
- 96.
Kundu S Kumar S Bajaj A. Cross-talk between bile acids and gastrointestinal tract for progression and development of cancer and its therapeutic implications. IUBMB Life (2015 ) 67(7):514–23
Not in our library10.1002/iub.1399
- 97.
- 98.
- 99.
Fiorucci S Distrutti E. Bile acid-activated receptors, intestinal microbiota, and the treatment of metabolic disorders. Trends Mol Med (2015 ) 21(11):702–14
Not in our library10.1016/j.molmed.2015.09.001
- 100.
- 101.
Lu TT Makishima M Repa JJ Schoonjans K Kerr TA Auwerx J. Molecular basis for feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis by nuclear receptors. Mol Cell (2000 ) 6(3):507–15
Not in our library10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00050-2
- 102.
Cariello M Piccinin E Garcia-Irigoyen O Sabbà C Moschetta A Nuclear receptor FXR. bile acids and liver damage: Introducing the progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis with FXR mutations. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis (2018 ) 1864(4 Pt B):1308–18
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.09.019
- 103.
Chávez-Talavera O Tailleux A Lefebvre P Staels B. Bile acid control of metabolism and inflammation in obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology (2017 ) 152(7):1679–94.e3
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.055
- 104.
Liu JZ van Sommeren S Huang H Ng SC Alberts R Takahashi A. Association analyses identify 38 susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease and highlight shared genetic risk across populations. Nat Genet (2015 ) 47(9):979–86
Not in our library10.1038/ng.3359
- 105.
- 106.
Sinha SR Haileselassie Y Nguyen LP Tropini C Wang M Becker LS. Dysbiosis-induced secondary bile acid deficiency promotes intestinal inflammation. Cell Host Microbe (2020 ) 27(4):659–70.e5
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.021
- 107.
- 108.
Carr RM Reid AE. FXR agonists as therapeutic agents for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Curr Atheroscl Rep (2015 ) 17(4):500
Not in our library10.1007/s11883-015-0500-2
- 109.
Jia W Xie G Jia W. Bile acid-microbiota crosstalk in gastrointestinal inflammation and carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol hepatol (2018 ) 15(2):111–28
Not in our library10.1038/nrgastro.2017.119
- 110.
Jia ET Liu ZY Pan M Lu JF Ge QY. Regulation of bile acid metabolism-related signaling pathways by gut microbiota in diseases. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B (2019 ) 20(10):781–92
Not in our library10.1631/jzus.b1900073
- 111.
Sun R Xu C Feng B Gao X Liu Z. Critical roles of bile acids in regulating intestinal mucosal immune responses. Therap Adv Gastroenterol (2021 ) 14:17562848211018098
Not in our library10.1177/17562848211018098
- 112.
Ala M. Tryptophan metabolites modulate inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer by affecting immune system. Int Rev Immunol (2022 ) 41(3):326–45
Not in our library10.1080/08830185.2021.1954638
- 113.
Fiore A Murray PJ. Tryptophan and indole metabolism in immune regulation. Curr Opin Immunol (2021 ) 70:7–14
Not in our library10.1016/j.coi.2020.12.001
- 114.
Cherayil BJ. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in intestinal immunity and inflammation. Inflammation Bowel Dis (2009 ) 15(9):1391–6
Not in our library10.1002/ibd.20910
- 115.
- 116.
Chung DJ Rossi M Romano E Ghith J Yuan J Munn DH. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing mature human monocyte-derived dendritic cells expand potent autologous regulatory T cells. Blood (2009 ) 114(3):555–63
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2008-11-191197
- 117.
Wang SJ Sharkey KA McKay DM. Modulation of the immune response by helminths: a role for serotonin? Biosci Rep (2018 ) 38(5):BSR20180027
Not in our library10.1042/bsr20180027
- 118.
Yano JM Yu K Donaldson GP Shastri GG Ann P Ma L. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell (2015 ) 161(2):264–76
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047
- 119.
Alexeev EE Lanis JM Kao DJ Campbell EL Kelly CJ Battista KD. Microbiota-derived indole metabolites promote human and murine intestinal homeostasis through regulation of interleukin-10 receptor. Am J Pathol (2018 ) 188(5):1183–94
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.01.011
- 120.
- 121.
Haghikia A Zimmermann F Schumann P Jasina A Roessler J Schmidt D. Propionate attenuates atherosclerosis by immune-dependent regulation of intestinal cholesterol metabolism. Eur Heart J (2022 ) 43(6):518–33
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehab644
- 122.
Brandsma E Kloosterhuis NJ Koster M Dekker DC Gijbels MJJ van der Velden S. A proinflammatory gut microbiota increases systemic inflammation and accelerates atherosclerosis. Circ Res (2019 ) 124(1):94–100
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.118.313234
- 123.
- 124.
- 125.
Li L Zhang Y Speakman JR Hu S Song Y Qin S. The gut microbiota and its products: Establishing causal relationships with obesity related outcomes. Obes reviews: an Off J Int Assoc Study Obes (2021 ) 22(12):e13341
Not in our library10.1111/obr.13341
- 126.
Caesar R. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for the gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Can J diabetes. (2019 ) 43(3):224–31
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.01.007
- 127.
Sehgal R de Mello VD Mannisto V Lindstrom J Tuomilehto J Pihlajamaki J. Indolepropionic acid, a gut bacteria-produced tryptophan metabolite and the risk of type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutrients (2022 ) 14(21):4695
Not in our library10.3390/nu14214695
- 128.
Qi Q Li J Yu B Moon JY Chai JC Merino J. Host and gut microbial tryptophan metabolism and type 2 diabetes: an integrative analysis of host genetics, diet, gut microbiome and circulating metabolites in cohort studies. Gut (2022 ) 71(6):1095–105
Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324053
- 129.
- 130.
- 131.
Li Y Zhou M Li C Pan X Lv N Ye Z. Inoculating indoleacetic acid bacteria promotes the enrichment of halotolerant bacteria during secondary fermentation of composting. J Environ Manage (2022 ) 322:116021
Not in our library10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116021
- 132.
Neinast M Murashige D Arany Z. Branched chain amino acids. Annu Rev Physiol (2019 ) 81:139–64
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-physiol-020518-114455
- 133.
Le Couteur DG Solon-Biet SM Cogger VC Ribeiro R de Cabo R Raubenheimer D. Branched chain amino acids, aging and age-related health. Ageing Res Rev (2020 ) 64:101198
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2020.101198
- 134.
- 135.
Krautkramer KA Fan J Bäckhed F. Gut microbial metabolites as multi-kingdom intermediates. Nat Rev Microbiol (2021 ) 19(2):77–94
Not in our library10.1038/s41579-020-0438-4
- 136.
- 137.
van Galen KA Ter Horst KW Serlie MJ. Serotonin, food intake, and obesity. Obes reviews: an Off J Int Assoc Study Obes (2021 ) 22(7):e13210
Not in our library10.1111/obr.13210
- 138.
Huda MN Kim M Bennett BJ. Modulating the microbiota as a therapeutic intervention for type 2 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (2021 ) 12:632335
Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2021.632335
- 139.
- 140.
Keszthelyi D Troost FJ Masclee AA. Understanding the role of tryptophan and serotonin metabolism in gastrointestinal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil. (2009 ) 21(12):1239–49
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01370.x
- 141.
Zhai L Wu J Lam YY Kwan HY Bian ZX Wong HLX. Gut-microbial metabolites, probiotics and their roles in type 2 diabetes. Int J Mol Sci (2021 ) 22(23):12846
Not in our library10.3390/ijms222312846
- 142.
Hashimoto T Perlot T Rehman A Trichereau J Ishiguro H Paolino M. ACE2 links amino acid malnutrition to microbial ecology and intestinal inflammation. Nature (2012 ) 487(7408):477–81
Not in our library10.1038/nature11228
- 143.
Gutiérrez-Vázquez C Quintana FJ. Regulation of the immune response by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Immunity (2018 ) 48(1):19–33
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2017.12.012
- 144.
- 145.
Sun M Ma N He T Johnston LJ Ma X. Tryptophan (Trp) modulates gut homeostasis via aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr (2020 ) 60(10):1760–8
Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2019.1598334
- 146.
Hubbard TD Murray IA Bisson WH Sullivan AP Sebastian A Perry GH. Divergent ah receptor ligand selectivity during hominin evolution. Mol Biol Evol (2016 ) 33(10):2648–58
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msw143
- 147.
Hidaka T Ogawa E Kobayashi EH Suzuki T Funayama R Nagashima T. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor AhR links atopic dermatitis and air pollution via induction of the neurotrophic factor artemin. Nat Immunol (2017 ) 18(1):64–73
Not in our library10.1038/ni.3614
- 148.
Mescher M Haarmann-Stemmann T. Modulation of CYP1A1 metabolism: From adverse health effects to chemoprevention and therapeutic options. Pharmacol Ther (2018 ) 187:71–87
Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.02.012
- 149.
Lamas B Hernandez-Galan L Galipeau HJ Constante M Clarizio A Jury J. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand production by the gut microbiota is decreased in celiac disease leading to intestinal inflammation. Sci Transl Med (2020 ) 12(566):eaba0624
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.aba0624
- 150.
Park SL Justiniano R Williams JD Cabello CM Qiao S Wondrak GT. The tryptophan-derived endogenous aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]Carbazole is a nanomolar UVA photosensitizer in epidermal keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol (2015 ) 135(6):1649–58
Not in our library10.1038/jid.2014.503
- 151.
Wang F Graham WV Wang Y Witkowski ED Schwarz BT Turner JR. Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha synergize to induce intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction by up-regulating myosin light chain kinase expression. Am J Pathol (2005 ) 166(2):409–19
Not in our library10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62264-x
- 152.
Yamada T Horimoto H Kameyama T Hayakawa S Yamato H Dazai M. Constitutive aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling constrains type I interferon-mediated antiviral innate defense. Nat Immunol (2016 ) 17(6):687–94
Not in our library10.1038/ni.3422
- 153.
Jennis M Cavanaugh CR Leo GC Mabus JR Lenhard J Hornby PJ. Microbiota-derived tryptophan indoles increase after gastric bypass surgery and reduce intestinal permeability in vitro and in vivo. Neurogastroenterol Motil. (2018 ) 30(2)
Not in our library10.1111/nmo.13178
- 154.
Wlodarska M Luo C Kolde R d’Hennezel E Annand JW Heim CE. Indoleacrylic acid produced by commensal peptostreptococcus species suppresses inflammation. Cell Host Microbe (2017 ) 22(1):25–37.e6
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2017.06.007
- 155.
Whitfield-Cargile CM Cohen ND Chapkin RS Weeks BR Davidson LA Goldsby JS. The microbiota-derived metabolite indole decreases mucosal inflammation and injury in a murine model of NSAID enteropathy. Gut Microbes (2016 ) 7(3):246–61
Not in our library10.1080/19490976.2016.1156827
- 156.
Lamas B Richard ML Sokol H. Caspase recruitment domain 9, microbiota, and tryptophan metabolism: dangerous liaisons in inflammatory bowel diseases. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care (2017 ) 20(4):243–7
Not in our library10.1097/mco.0000000000000382
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.