Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

Immune and inflammatory mechanisms of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Ana Cristina Márquez-Sánchez, Ekaterina K. Koltsova

Frontiers in Immunology · 2022 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.989933

Abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening cardiovascular disease. Immune-mediated infiltration and a destruction of the aortic wall during AAA development plays significant role in the pathogenesis of this disease. While various immune cells had been found in AAA, the mechanisms of their activation and function are still far from being understood. A better understanding of mechanisms regulating the development of aberrant immune cell activation in AAA is essential for the development of novel preventive and therapeutic approaches. In this review we summarize current knowledge about the role of immune cells in AAA and discuss how pathogenic immune cell activation is regulated in this disease.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death globally with an estimated ~18 millions of annual deaths (up to 32% of global deaths) and high prevalence in both high and low income countries. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a CVD characterized by abdominal aorta dilatation exceeding the diameter of aorta by 50%, caused by immune cell-mediated inflammation and degradation of the medial layer; eventually followed by aortic rupture and bleeding that is often sudden and fatal. AAA affects about 5% of the population and represent 15th most frequent cause of mortality in the US, where each year ~200,000 people are diagnosed with AAA. Smoking, age (> 60 years old), hypertension, atherosclerosis, and male gender are established AAA risk factors. Although new potential therapies have been recently proposed for AAA treatment, including nanoparticles loaded with antihypertensive drugs, statins or inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), the current standard of care is still mostly limited to surgery at late stages of the disease. Despite significant progress in the understanding of pathophysiology of AAA, immune and inflammatory mechanisms controlling this disease pathogenesis only recently started to come to light as a mainstream and pivotal players. Nowadays, chronic inflammation caused by the infiltration and activation of various immune cells is an important driver of AAA. Yet, factors regulating immune cell recruitment and activation in AAA remains incompletely understood. Here we discuss recent data on immune and inflammatory mechanisms implicated to the control of AAA development and briefly highlight local and systemic factors impacting immune cell activation in this disease.

Innate immune cells

Myeloid cells, including neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells (DC) play diverse and important roles in inflammation, immunity and tissue repair. They also contribute to the aortic inflammation and vessel destruction during AAA. Early myeloid cell infiltration in the aortic wall is considered to be a hallmark of AAA development both in mice and humans, suggesting that these cells could contribute to initial steps of aortic wall destruction (Figure 1).

Neutrophils

Neutrophils, cells of bone marrow origin, are the most abundant circulating leukocytes in the human immune system and the first effector cells to be recruited to the site of injury, infection or inflammation. Neutrophils represent one of the most prevalent cell populations found in the aneurysm and are detected even in early lesions. Neutrophils are capable to release different types of granules containing various bioactive molecules such as myeloperoxidase (MPO), neutrophil elastase (NE), defensins, cathepsin G, azurodicin, and endotoxin-neutralizing proteins, NADPH oxidase (NOX) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The latter are highly abundant in human and mouse AAA tissues. Activated neutrophils produce extracellular traps (NETs), a web-like defense structures to trap foreign cells, growth factors, cytokines, proteases and expose them to effector protein. NETs are long intersecting fibers consisting of released neutrophil DNA, and histones 3 and 4 (H3 and H4) as well as cytoplasm-derived effector molecules MPO, NE, and cathepsin G. Neutrophils play essential and diverse roles in CVD. NETs production in atherosclerosis is triggered by inflammatory stimuli including LPS and cholesterol crystals. Hypochlorous acid generated by MPO oxidizes circulating LDL, contributing to the activation of macrophages and foam cell formation. Neutrophil NETs promote inflammation facilitating the activation of Th17 cells and macrophages regulating the release of IL-1β, IL-18 and other pro-inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, NETs induce apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) leading to the thinning of the fibrous cap and eventual plaque rupture. In myocardial infarction (MI), the recruitment and infiltration of neutrophils has been also associated with cardiac damage, but nevertheless neutrophils are needed for healing processes after MI. Neutropenic mice were characterized by increased fibrosis and heart failure because of altered macrophage polarization skewed to a highly inflammatory state with low phagocytic capacity.

NLR (Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio) was recently suggested as a prognostic marker for AAA patients, where high frequency of neutrophils in circulation in comparison with lymphocytes predicted a poor prognosis and mortality in patients with ruptured aneurysm. It has been shown that neutrophils, neutrophil-derived IL-8 and NETs elements were elevated in plasma and tissue of patients with AAA suggesting enhanced neutrophil activation. The recruitment of neutrophils is facilitated by CXCL1, CCL2, CCL5 and CXCL8 chemokines that are mainly produced by pro-inflammatory macrophages and are elevated in serum and aorta from humans and mice with AAA. The depletion of neutrophils or genetic ablation of neutrophil-specific genes (e.g., MPO, MMP-9) attenuates AAA development, suggesting overall pathogenic role for these cells in AAA. Several types of neutrophil-derived effector molecules including NETs were detected in the intraluminal thrombus of patients with advanced AAA. In elastase mouse model, NETs citrullinated (cit-) H3 and neutrophil elastase were found in the adventitia and at the border of intima and media; and depositions of cit- H3 and H4 were found in the intraluminal thrombus where they co-localized with IL-1β. Both Angiotensin (Ang) II and NADPH oxidase-derived ROS were also shown to stimulate NETs formation and inhibition of NETosis by altering the function of PAD enzyme family significantly limits aneurysm development. Altogether, these studies imply neutrophils as important inflammatory regulators of AAA. Nevertheless, mechanisms triggering NETosis as well as interaction of neutrophils with other cell types within AAA lesions require further investigation. It also remains to be determined whether neutrophils initiate the destruction of the aortic wall in AAA or simply work as a first responders to the injury driven by some other factors.

Monocytes

Monocytes, originated from the bone marrow, play crucial roles in host defense and contribute to various chronic inflammatory diseases, including CVD. In humans, three populations of monocytes have been described based on CD14 and CD16 surface expression. Classical monocytes represent up to 90% of circulating monocytes and are characterized by CD14++ and CD16- expression, high surface expression of CCR2, CD62L (L-selectin), and low levels of CX3CR1. Non-classical monocytes are characterized by CD14+ CD16++ surface phenotype, high levels of CX3CR1 and low CCR2. The third population has an “intermediate” phenotype of CD14++ CD16+ and was suggested to have pro-inflammatory and enhanced phagocytic properties. In mice, two homologous populations Ly6Chigh (classical) and Ly6Clow (non-classical) had been described. Ly6Chigh monocytes are equivalent to human classical monocytes, and were shown to promote inflammatory responses and perform antimicrobial and phagocytic functions. Ly6Clow monocytes, corresponding to human non-classical monocytes, are involved in vessel patrolling, immune surveillance and tissue repair. Monocytes had been implicated to the pathogenesis of various CVD, and elevated numbers of circulating monocytes had been associated with atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction and AAA. Several studies described changes in circulating monocytes in patients with AAA. While one study showed a reduction of classical monocytes in circulation and augmented proportion of intermediate monocytes, an increase of classical monocytes or no alterations in their presence had been also reported. In mice Ang II infusion, which heightens blood pressure and drives AAA development, was shown to increase number of circulating Ly6Chigh monocytes, while the administration of angiopoietin 2 reduced circulating Ly6Chigh monocytes and attenuated AAA. Moreover, mice lacking CCR2 were protected from AAA due to the limited recruitment of monocytes to the aorta along with low IL-6 and CCL2 expression. The role of CD11b, an integrin subunit expressed on monocytes, but also on macrophages and facilitating the recruitment of immune cells to the site of inflammation, had been investigated in AAA. Higher levels of CD11b on circulating monocytes from patients with AAA compared to healthy subjects have been reported. In vitro experiments showed that monocytes from patients with AAA are more capable for adhesion and transmigration. However, the knockout of CD11b (Itgam-/- ) did not significantly affect the incidence of AAA, but nevertheless reduced maximum abdominal aortic diameter, macrophage infiltration, MMP-9 and IL-6 expression, as well as elastin and collagen degradation.

Monocytes differentiate from hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC); and Ang II was shown to activate those cells and stimulate myelopoiesis in the bone marrow. Another source of monocytes is a spleen where extramedullar hematopoiesis occurs. Spleen-derived monocytes were shown to contribute to atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction and AAA. Recent study demonstrated that in AAA acute mobilization of monocytes from the spleen to the circulation was dependent on Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells (TREM)1 and driven by Ang II via AT1R. Moreover, TREM 1 was also shown to regulate CD62L expression thereby facilitating monocyte infiltration into the aortic wall during AAA development.

The role of non-classical Ly6Clow monocytes in AAA had been also suggested in studies utilizing NR4A1 (Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A transcription factor) deficient mice. The reduction of Ly6Clow monocytes in these animals was associated with augmented AAA and elevated elastin destruction, suggesting potentially protective role of this monocyte subset. While these data imply that circulating monocytes play important roles in AAA, a detailed contribution of monocyte subsets, their cooperation with neutrophils and mechanisms controlling monocyte output in AAA remains to be elucidated.

Macrophages

Monocytes recruited to the aortic tissue are capable to further differentiate into macrophages or dendritic cells (DC). Monocytes-derived macrophages are generally classified into “inflammatory” and “tissue repair” subsets, both of which had been implicated to AAA development. While the localization of macrophages in AAA had been established, macrophage polarization at different stages of the disease requires further investigation. Single-cell RNA sequencing of aortas showed about 5-fold early expansion of pro-inflammatory macrophages in CaCl2-induced AAA, while tissue-repair subset was not affected, suggesting the predominance of inflammatory macrophages.

Inflammatory macrophages acquire their phenotype upon activation with a vast variety of stimuli, including LPS, ROS, fatty acids, inflammatory cytokines or local hypoxia in the aortic wall. Inflammatory macrophages are characterized by elevated expression of pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF, IL-12, IL-23, MMPs, NOS2 and chemokines including CCL2 and CXCL1, in turn regulating the recruitment and activation of other immune cells as well as VSMC apoptosis. The expression of these pro-inflammatory molecules is particularly prominent at the advanced stages of AAA. Moreover, Ang II was suggested to promote macrophage activation via upregulation of TLR4.

The role of various macrophage-derived cytokines and bioactive molecules had been investigated in multiple studies using pharmacological or genetic approaches, however many studies reported the conflicting results depending on the model used. For example, pharmacological blockade or knockout of IL-1β was shown to reduce AAA in CaCl2 model. However, recent study by Batra et al. using the same mouse model of AAA came to the opposite conclusions and showed that Il1β-/- or Il1r-/- mice were not protected from the disease development, and Il1r-/- mice develop even larger AAA. Serum IL-1β levels were elevated in patients with AAA, which particularly was linked to rs35829419 polymorphism of NLRP3 common allele. Indeed heightened expression of NLRP3 inflammasome had been detected in AAA tissue. The genetic inactivation of NLRP3, or other inflammasome components (caspase-1 or ASC) reduced the incidence of AAA and ECM degradation in mice infused with Ang II. Activation of TLR4 can induce MMP9 expression in VSMC and macrophages, while expression of these entities was reversed in Tlr4-/- mice. Similar results were observed with TLR4 antagonist, Eritoran. Recent study also documented higher TLR4 and MMP9 expression in lymphocytes rather than macrophages in human AAA.

Extracellular matrix degradation mediated by MMPs is a hallmark of AAA. Elevated serum MMP9 served as a prognostic marker for AAA, and it is known that genetic ablation of MMP9 and MMP2 halts AAA development in CaCl2 model. Adoptively transferred WT macrophages promoted AAA growth in Mmp9-/- but not Mmp2-/- mice, suggesting the importance of MMPs in macrophages and collaborative action between MMP2 and MMP9.

TNF, a major macrophage-derived cytokine was suggested to contribute to AAA in calcium chloride model, and its genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of TNF limited AAA development. At the same time the ablation of its main receptor TNFR1 (p55) in Ldlr-/- mice subjected to Ang II infusion did not significantly affect AAA formation, but strongly reduced atherosclerosis.

Elevated levels of IL-6, which is presumably myeloid cell derived, had been detected in serum and aortic tissue from patients with AAA. The production of IL-6 in aneurysm tissue is directly regulated by Ang II signaling; and IL-6 ablation protects from endothelial dysfunction induced by Ang II.

The role of IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines in AAA was suggested but different studies reported conflicting results. Antibody-mediated blockade of IL-12p40 at early stages of the AAA reduced aortic diameter and limited macrophage infiltration in elastase perfusion model. However, knockout of IL-12p40 resulted in augmented AAA development in Ang II model. While the observed difference in phenotypes may be due to different models used, it is important to note that p40 is a shared subunit between IL-23 and IL-12, and therefore genetic inactivation likely affects both cytokines. These data suggest that the results using neutralization or genetic knockout of one of the subunits of heterodimeric cytokines should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, both IL-12 and IL-23 are implicated in the regulation of microbiota, the effect of which has to be considered.

Recent studies identified among CD11b+CD68+Adgre1+ macrophages a unique subset marked by Netrin 1 expression. Netrin 1 (Ntn1) is a protein of the laminin family, which was suggested to be involved into the axon guidance and cell migration. Ntn1-positive macrophages expressed high amounts of pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic markers including MMP3, while macrophages with lower levels of Ntn1 exhibited anti-inflammatory phenotype and expressed high level of macrophage mannose receptor 1 (Mrc1) and Scd1, Cd36, Cydec, Dgat2, Apoc1 genes. Hematopoietic cell-specific Netrin-1 deficiency, meanwhile, prevented AAA formation.

Exosomes are lipid bilayer nanoparticles containing RNA and proteins that mediate cell-cell communication. They are produced by macrophages and other cell types as communication tools. Increased presence of exosomes has been associated with CVD, including AAA where exosomes were detected in the adventitia, mostly in areas of macrophage accumulation. In vitro experiments suggest that macrophage exosomes mediate VSMC migration and metabolism by modulating the expression of MMP2 in JNK- and p38-dependent manner. Inhibition of exosome formation by GW4869 reduced AAA progression, preserved elastin integrity and decreased MMP2 expression in a mouse model.

Tissue repair macrophages, known to perform tissue surveillance and tissue repair functions, are also implicated in AAA development. This subset of macrophages becomes more abundant at the late stages of the disease development, which might represent a compensatory mechanism to prevent further AAA expansion or rectify tissue injury. While Ang II stimulates Ly6Chigh monocyte infiltration, it was also suggested to regulate the switch from pro-inflammatory to tissue repair macrophage phenotype. Also, coagulation factor XIIIa was shown to promote macrophage differentiation toward tissue repair phenotype in the aneurysm. Cytokines produced by this subset of macrophages, such as IL-10 and TGFβ, had been shown to play an important protective role in AAA. Increased IL-10 systemic level correlated with reduced AAA diameter and dissection in elastase model in rabbits and Apoe-/- mice infused with Ang II. Infusion of recombinant IL-10 promoted smooth muscle cells proliferation in the aorta, and systemic induction of IL-10 by its overexpression increased accumulation of FoxP3+ Tregs in aortic tissue reducing the inflammation and diameter of AAA. Transforming growth factor (TGF-β) was shown play a protective role in AAA, since antibody neutralization of TGF-β augments AAA severity accompanied by macrophage accumulation in the aortic wall and enhanced ECM degradation. VSMC specific deletion of TGFβR2, however, seems to protect from the development of thoracic but not abdominal aneurysms, implying that TGFβ could act through different cell types at different part of the aorta.

Tissue resident macrophages. Aortas also harbor tissue resident macrophages, which originate from yolk sac during development. These macrophages are also heterogeneous and can be polarized toward anti-inflammatory or tissue repair subsets. In cardiac repair, they play an important role in tissue regeneration and were shown to remove debris, regulate extracellular matrix (ECM), and stimulate cardiomyocytes proliferation, but their exact role in AAA has not been fully dissected yet. Single cell RNAseq analysis of elastase-driven AAA and healthy vessels revealed that CX3CR1+ (yolk-sac derived) macrophages are the most abundant subset in healthy aorta representing 62.5% of total macrophage population, while bone marrow derived macrophages (CCR2+Ly6C2lowF4/80lowCD11blowH2-Aalow) start to dominate in AAA lesions. Another tissue resident subset of Flt3+ macrophages is increased in AAA and expresses pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as CCL3, IL-1β and IL-10, suggesting their contribution to cell recruitment and activation. A trans-differentiation of VSMCs toward a “macrophage-like” phenotype was demonstrated in atherosclerotic disease, however the relevance of this mechanism to AAA remains to be determined.

The interplay between monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils could also be implicated to their reciprocal activation during AAA pathogenesis. Early monocytes infiltration in the aortic wall in AAA and differentiation toward inflammatory macrophage subset with the subsequent production of CXCL1 may further facilitate neutrophil recruitment, contributing to the aortic wall destruction. Conversely, neutrophils produce IL-6 known to contribute to pro-inflammatory macrophage activation. Moreover, macrophage macropinocytosis was linked to the engulfment of NETs, and a negative correlation between the density of macrophages and NETs in AAA was observed.

Dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DC) are professional antigen presenting cells that link innate and adaptive immune responses. DC activate T cells and also contribute to innate immune responses via secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF, IL-12, IL-23 and others as well as chemokines. Dendritic cells can be divided on conventional DC, plasmacytoid DC, lymphoid DC and inflammatory DC subsets. The latter differentiate from the recruited monocytes at the site of inflammation. DC had been detected in AAA and depletion of CD11c+ DC using DTR-driven approaches led to the reduction in maximum diameter of AAA in Ang II-driven model. Depletion of DC lowered numbers of circulating CD44high CD62Llow effector CD4 T cells, CD44high CD62Llow effector CD8 T cells and B cells. Moreover, DC depletion also attenuated SRA matrix degradation by limiting neutrophil elastase activity, resulting in limited elastin degradation and heightened collagen content. Plasmacytoid DC activation in AAA has been linked to NET formation due to their ability to produce cathelicidin and type I IFNs. Therefore, DC were suggested to promote lymphocyte and neutrophil infiltration and activation, and regulate matrix content and organization. Nevertheless, the putative self-antigens presented by DC in AAA are not known and mechanisms driving initial DC accumulation and activation in AAA remains to be elucidated.

Mast cells

Mast cells had been detected in AAA lesions in outer media and adventitia, and their number correlated with AAA diameter. Mast cells are known to produce proteases such as tryptase and chymase, inhibition of which is explored as a therapeutic approach for AAA in animal models. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) is a signature molecule of allergic responses activating FcϵR1 on mast cells. Apoe-/-Ige-/- mice infused with Ang-II or treated with CaCl2 were protected from AAA and neutralization of IgE by antibodies reduced AAA formation and inflammation in the aorta. Amelioration of the disease was accompanied by limited recruitment of neutrophils and lowered expression of MIP-2a and CXCL5 in AAA tissue. One of the suggested mechanisms was via TNF produced by mast cells, which was regulated by metalloendopeptidase Meprin-α (Mep1A). Mast cell-derived TNF regulated MMP2 production and VSMC apoptosis in AAA; and the Mep1A deficiency ameliorated the disease. These observations provide an important largely unexplored link between allergic inflammation and AAA development and warrant detailed investigation in future studies.

NK and ILC cells

Both Natural killer (NK) and Innate lymphoid cells (ILC) are professional innate cytotoxic cells capable of producing cytokines, such as IFNγ, or cytotoxic molecules, such as FasL (CD95L), perforin and granzymes. They typically act to eliminate infected, stressed, senescent or transformed cells. NK cells represent a potent source of inflammatory IFNγ, and their pathologic role in atherosclerosis had been previously suggested. Immunohistochemistry and microarray analysis of human AAA tissue revealed elevated presence of NK cells in AAA tissue along with upregulated granzyme B and other cytotoxic markers. Hematopoietic deficiency of CD95L, a transmembrane protein regulating cell death or pro-survival pathways, significantly reduced AAA formation in CaCl2 model, which was associated with lowered infiltration of macrophages and T cells along with limited MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression.

Innate lymphoid cells (ILC) comprise of three major populations (ILC1, ILC2 and ILC3) which are characterized by distinct functions and spectrum of produced cytokines. ILCs can be typically found at mucosal surfaces, in the adventitia of arteries, pericardium, adipose tissue as well as liver. While ILC1 are known producers of IFNγ, ILC2 represents a critical source of type 2 cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13. ILC2 were implicated to the regulation of metabolic homeostasis, obesity, helminth infection and allergic lung inflammation. In atherosclerosis-prone mice fed with high fat diet (HFD) ILC2 cells were found in para-aortic fat tissue and were characterized by pro-inflammatory gene expression profile. Also, NK cells expressing IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 were associated with the development of AAA in early studies, nowadays would be probably classified as ILC2. NK cell mediated IL-13 production can induce MMP-2, -9, -13 and -14 in pulmonary diseases, thereby hinting at its potential role in AAA progression via similar mechanisms. ILC3 are RORγt-dependent cells, which produce IL-17A and IL-22 cytokines. The role of these cells in CVD only recently attracted attention and was discussed elsewhere, while their role in AAA have not yet been examined.

iNKT

Invariant Natural Killer T (iNKT) cells express TCRβ and NK1.1 surface markers. NKT cells recognize non-classical antigens, including lipids, presented in the context of MHC-I and MHC-I-like molecules, including CD1d. In vascular diseases, NKT cells has been implicated in the progression of atherosclerosis. In human AAA tissue, an increased proportion of activated Vα24Jα18+NKT subsets in the media was reported. Elevated presence of iNKT cells in AAA had been also found in Apoe-/- mice infused with Ang II, especially after the treatment with α-galactosylceramide (αGC), a synthetic glycolipid that activates iNKT cells via CD1d. That correlated with increased incidence of AAA. Histopathological, immunofluorescent staining and RNAseq results also showed more severe infiltration by inflammatory cells in the Ang II+ αGC group. Interestingly, opposite results were found in another study, where activation of iNKT cells by αGC attenuated Ang II-mediated AAA in obese ob/ob mice via induction of anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization. Overall this points out to possible iNKT role in AAA development but complimentary “loss-of-function” experiments are still missing.

T cells

T cells represent a key arm of adaptive immunity and are composed of CD4+TCRβ+ (helper) and CD8+TCRβ+ (cytotoxic) subsets. Depending on environmental cues CD4 T cells can differentiated toward Th1, Th2, Th17, Th22, regulatory T (Treg, CD4+FoxP3+CD25+) and more recently described Tfh lineages, most of which have been found in AAA. T helper subsets are characterized by the production of subset-specific cytokines impacting the inflammatory environment at the site of inflammation. Degradation of ECM proteins such as elastin and collagen progressing during AAA development is accompanied by CD4+ T cells infiltration. Recent study utilizing RNAseq on sorted “bulk/conventional” CD4 T cells revealed that CXCR6/CXCL16 axis is necessary for the recruitment of CD4 T cells to AAA. CD4 T cells were shown to produce GM-CSF, which in turn controls the recruitment and polarization of pro-inflammatory monocytes to the aortic wall through upregulation of CCL2 and activation of IRF5 (interferon regulatory factor 5).

Th subsets: Th1 and Th2

Th1 cells are characterized by production of IFNγ, which plays a pro-inflammatory role in atherosclerosis. In AAA, however, the role of IFNγ is not clearly defined. Early studies showed that administration of recombinant IFNγ into mice lacking CD4+ T cells promotes aneurysm development. However, IFNγ deficiency was also associated with augmented AAA in Ang II–induced mouse model, suggesting a protective role for this cytokine in AAA. The proposed mechanism suggests that IFNγ is a regulator of CXCL10 expression in AAA, which in turn controls the recruitment of protective effector T cells. However, CXCL10 can also attract NK cells, which are considered pathogenic in AAA because of the production of so-called “type 2” cytokines (IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13) in antigen-independent, innate immune mode manner. Moreover, the neutralization of IFNγ by antibodies did not protect mice from AAA. Overall while these observations put IFNγ as an important player in AAA, they warrant further studies of its role at different stages of this disease, mechanisms of its induction, cell specificity of IFNγR signaling as well as cell type specific mechanisms of IFNγ production.

Th2 helper subset is characterized by the production of “type 2 cytokines” such as IL-4 and IL-5; and in that capacity these cells are similar to ILC2 and NK cells. These cytokines contribute to the control of B cell activation and clonal expansion. They were shown to suppress early atherosclerotic lesions, however IL-4 deficiency only slightly alters the course of the disease. IL-5 deficiency was shown to accelerate atherosclerosis. However, in AAA Th2 cells producing IL-4 and IL-5 were suggested to be pathogenic, particularly due to the ability to induce VSMC apoptosis. The shift from Th1 to Th2 was associated with AAA augmentation. In humans, however, large AAA were characterized by Th1 cytokines profile whereas Th2 response was a predominant in patients with small aneurysms. The difficulty to assign a specific role for Th2 cells in AAA is related to the fact that type II cytokines can be also produced by NK cells and ILC2. The specific cellular source of type 2 cytokines had not been explicitly studied in AAA and future studies addressing cell specificity will be important.

Th17 cells

Th17 helper subset is regulated by the transcription factor RORγt and known to produce characteristic cytokines IL-17A, IL-17F and IL-22. Th17 cells are dependent on IL-23, IL-6 and IL-1β cytokines derived from myeloid and epithelial cells. Th17 cells play a pro-inflammatory, disease-promoting role in many inflammatory pathologies, including atherosclerosis and had been implicated to AAA. IL-17A genetic deletion in elastase model of AAA attenuated the disease development and limited inflammatory cell infiltration. Similar phenotype was also observed in the Ang II-infusion model, where genetic and pharmacological neutralization of IL-17 or use of RORγt antagonist limited the disease. Conversely, SOCS3 (suppressor of cytokine signaling 3) overexpression and reduction of IL-17A expression accelerated AAA. It is important to note that SOCS3 has multiple downstream targets beside IL-17A, for instance IL-10, which has its own, protective function in AAA. As Th17 cells expansion is driven by IL-23, its genetic and pharmacological ablation mitigated AAA, which was associated with reduced IL-12p40 production and lowered MMP expression.

Overall, more mechanistic studies better dissecting cell type specific responses are needed to elucidate the relative contribution of Th1 versus Th2 versus Th17 or other subsets of CD4 T cells in comparison with other cell types producing similar cytokines in AAA.

Regulatory T cells

Tregs are professional suppressors of immune and inflammatory responses known to inhibit the activation of other T cells and innate immune cells, thereby controlling the inflammation, autoimmunity, and anti-tumor immunity. Tregs had been detected in aortic tissue and their protective role in atherosclerosis had been demonstrated in multiple studies. Tregs were also implicated to AAA pathogenesis by suppressing inflammatory cell accumulation (mainly macrophages and T cells) and proinflammatory molecules expression including CCL2, IL-6 and ICAM-1. Prostanoids and eicosanoids are essential inflammatory mediators associated with AAA development, and cyclooxygenase COX2, an enzyme regulating the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostanoids and eicosanoids, expression is upregulated in patients with AAA. Tregs can suppress COX2 expression by myeloid cells, thereby limiting AAA.

T cell co-inhibitory molecule cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) is known to act as a potent negative regulator of immune responses. Overexpression of CTLA4 in CTLA-4 transgenic Apoe-/- mice fed with WD and infused with Ang II limited AAA incidence by 66%, reduced the diameter of abdominal aorta and mortality by 26%. These effects led to lowered number of accumulated CD4 T cells and downregulated expression of CD80 and CD86 (ligands for CTLA-4) on CD11c+ dendritic cells in lymphoid tissues. CD11c depletion led to reduced accumulation of macrophages and CD4 T cells, attenuating aortic inflammation, preserved vessel integrity, and decreased AAA and aortic rupture. In atherosclerosis Tregs in the aorta were shown to lose their suppressing anti-inflammatory properties converting to pro-inflammatory subsets. The conversion was mediated by the environment in atherosclerotic plaque characterized by local hypoxia, dyslipidemia and overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. During atherosclerosis development Tregs were shown to lose FoxP3 (Treg specific transcription factor) expression, thereby switching to exTregs and upregulating transcription factors typical for other Th subsets, for instance to Th1 or Tfh (follicular helper cells). It remains to be determined whether such conversion also takes place in AAA.

Pharmacological treatment with statins has been widely used in CVD, in part due to their immunomodulatory properties. Simvastatin and Treg depletion with anti-CD25 antibody in Apoe-/- mice subjected to Ang II infusion lowered the incidence and severity of AAA accompanied by reduced VSMC apoptosis and ROS production in the aortic wall. In patients with AAA receiving simvastatin, the levels of Ang II signaling marker caveolin-1 and Nrf2 activation were decreased, while protective eNOS expression was increased, suggesting its beneficial effect in AAA.

T follicular helper cells and T follicular regulatory helper cells

T follicular helper cells (Tfh) are localized in the germinal centers of secondary lymphoid organs where they regulate antibody class switching in B cells thereby controlling humoral immunity. Tfh are characterized by the expression of transcriptional factor Bcl-6 (B cell lymphoma 6) as well as CXCR5 and PD-1 (programmed death-1). A circulating subpopulation is characterized by CXCR3 and CCR6 expression and can be divided on cTfh1 (CXCR3+CCR6−; producing IFNγ), cTfh2 (CXCR3−CCR6−; secreting IL‐4, IL‐5, and IL‐13), and cTfh17 (CXCR3−CCR6+; producing IL‐17A and IL‐22) subsets. Tfh cells have been implicated to the regulation of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases including CVD. Their presence had been detected in the aortic wall and CXCR3+ Tfh cells were found elevated in atherogenic environment. Moreover, decreased frequency of cTfh1 and increased frequency of cTfh2 and cTfh17 had been described in patients with atherosclerosis compared to healthy controls. The genetic ablation of Bcl-6 in CD4+T cells slightly reduce atherosclerotic plaque size in Apoe-/- mice.

T follicular regulatory helper cells (Tfr) are Tfh cells that also express FoxP3 as well as IL-10 and TGFβ. Tfr cells were shown to suppress the activation of Tfh cells upon adoptive transfer to Apoe-/- mice causing marked decrease of Thf population along with atherosclerotic plaque size. However, the role of these cells in AAA is yet to be investigated.

CD8 T cells

Much less is known about the contribution of CD8 cytotoxic T cells to AAA development. Early studies found CD8+CD28− IFNγ producing T cells in AAA tissue and in circulation. Besides, a population of CD8 T cells lacking CD27 (that allows accumulation of CD8 T cells in tissues) was detected in human AAA lesions but not peripheral blood, suggesting a potential unique role of this subset of CD8 T cells in AAA. More recently, the role of CD8 T cells was assessed in the elastase model of AAA utilizing Cd8-/- animals and transgenic CD8 T cells. The study suggested that CD8, but not CD4 T cell derived IFNγ activates MMP9 and MMP2, thereby enhancing AAA development.

γδ T cells

γδ T cells is a subset of T lymphocytes that can directly recognize antigen without APC and produce IL-17 and IFNγ. γδ T cells were detected in atherosclerotic aortas and were suggested to regulate neutrophil activation in IL-17 dependent manner. In humans, no difference in proportions of CD4, CD8, and γδ1+ T cells were detected between aneurysm tissue and PBMCs. At the same time γδ2+ T cells were found in greater numbers in aorta, and the frequency of Tregs was significantly lower in AAA compared to PBMCs. The number of CXCR5 expressing Vδ2+ T cells was significantly increased in aneurysm tissue compared to normal aorta or PBMCs from patients with aneurysm. Moreover, the frequency of IL-17A+ cells in AAA was significantly higher among γδ2+ T cells compared to CD4 or CD8 T cells. Importantly, IL-17A-producing γδ2+ T cells were found only in the aortic tissue, implying their potential role in the progression of AAA. In experimental model, γδ T cell deficiency inhibited the inflammatory response in the aorta and attenuated AAA, suggesting overall pro-inflammatory AAA-promoting role for γδ T cells.

B cells

B cells represent another key arm of adaptive immunity performing their functions via antibody and cytokine production as well as antigen presentation. Two types of B cells had been described: B1 and B2. B1 cells originate from fetal liver and in adult organisms mostly reside in the abdominal cavity. They are active producers of IgM antibody with predominant specificity to different components of bacterial products and phospholipids; their activation is mostly T-cell independent. B1 cells control atherosclerosis by the production of LDL specific IgM antibodies, which suppressed inflammatory macrophages polarization and foam cell formation. B2 cells develop in bone marrow and differentiate to antibody-producing plasma cells upon antigen exposure and help from T cells. B2 cells produce different flavors of antibodies, including IgG, IgA and IgE, as well as cytokines IL-10 and IL-6, and can further promote Th1 and Th17 cell responses. IgE was shown to activate CD4 T cells and macrophages through FcϵR1 receptor recognizing IgE. In atherosclerosis, high fat diet (HFD) was shown to enhance the activation of T cells by augmenting cDC production, a mechanism in part mediated by B cell derived GM-CSF. In addition, atherosclerotic plaque is a source of endogenous TLR ligands that might promote B cell activation.

The role of B cells in AAA had been also suggested. B cells had been detected mostly in adventitia in both human and mouse AAA. Ablation of B cells by knockout of muMT (IgG heavy chain) or cell depletion by anti-CD20 reduced AAA development in elastase and Ang II infusion models, which was associated with an increased presence of Tregs. B cell-deficient muMT mice were presented with reduced expression of MMP9. Furthermore, inhibition of key B cell receptor signaling molecule Syk suppressed AAA growth, reduced inflammatory response and limited immunoglobulin deposition in AAA. This overall suggests that B2 cells promote AAA. B cell accumulation in CaCl2-induced AAA at various stages of the disease progression does not significantly change during the disease progression, however, IgG and IgM had been detected in AAA with a peak at 1 week after the CaCl2 perfusion. Interestingly, B cell activation and production of autoantibodies such as anti-Hsp70, anti-Hsp65, or anti-AT1R occurs in humans and rodent models of hypertension, suggesting a potential role of Ang II in B cell activation. BAFF, a member of the tumor necrosis factor family of cytokines, drives the differentiation of B cells and is a critical survival factor for mature B cells. Recent studies demonstrated that blockade of BAFF receptors in elastase perfusion model attenuated AAA. The antagonist of BAFF depleted most of mature B cell subsets in spleen and circulation, decreased infiltration of B cells to the aorta, along with proinflammatory macrophages, and reduced number of apoptotic cells in AAA. The study also reported that in AAA tissue, B cells and macrophages were found in close contact, suggesting a possible role of B cell-macrophage communication in AAA pathology. Future studies will be needed to elucidate the mechanisms regulating B cell activation in AAA, role of specific antibodies, including IgA as well as contribution of B1 cells and IgM to AAA pathogenesis.

Taken together, most of the immune subsets have well established or suggested function in AAA which is further summarized in Table 1, along with the information of genetic or pharmacological tools helpful to ascertain the role of various cells in AAA promotion or inhibition.

Mechanisms that regulate immune cells in AAA

While various immune cells had been detected in aortic tissue and multiple study attempted to address the mechanistic role of these cells in AAA, the upstream mechanisms controlling immune cells activation and accumulation in AAA are still under investigation. Despite previously established roles of listed below factors in immune cell activation in other diseases including CVD, one can hypothesize and extrapolate it to AAA to suggest how these factors influence immune activation and function in AAA and where spatially the activation of immune cells occurs (Figure 2).

Angiotensin II

High blood pressure is one of the key risk factors for AAA. RAS (Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System) controls vasoconstriction and blood pressure. Moreover, RAS was also implicated in the regulation of cell growth and vascular wall integrity influencing many cellular processes. Ang II is one of the key enzymes of RAS. Ang II acts through its receptors AT1R and AT2R to regulate cardiovascular remodeling. Ang II also shares some of the signaling pathways with growth factors, promoting growth of cardiac myocytes, fibroblasts and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) via MAPKKK pathway. AT1Rs are expressed by vascular, endothelial cells and various immune cells suggesting Ang II involvement in their activation. Multiple studies demonstrated the effect of Ang II on immune cells. For example, Ang II was shown to induce a pro-inflammatory program in THP-1 macrophages in vitro. Moreover, interaction between Ang II and core clock gene Rev-erbα in macrophages had been proposed, which through the AT1R/LXRα pathway was implicated to the control of MMP9 expression. Furthermore, Ang II was shown to control not only mature immune cells but also hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) leading to enhanced myeloid differentiation and myeloid cells production.

Recent work identified cytokine-dependent mechanisms that cooperate with Ang II to induce stress myelopoiesis and AAA. Specifically, IL-27R signaling was shown to potentiate the response of HSPC in the bone marrow to Ang II. The ablation of IL-27R in mice infused with Ang II protected them from AAA. Mitigation of aneurysm development was associated with blunted accumulation of myeloid cells in the aorta due to attenuation of Ang II-induced HSC expansion. Mechanistically, IL-27R signaling was required to induce transcriptional programming to overcome HSC quiescence and increase differentiation and output of mature myeloid cells in response to stress stimuli to promote their accumulation in the diseased aorta. It is conceivable that other cytokines (such as IL-1 and IFNγ) may also conspire with Ang II to enhance emergency myelopoiesis from BM during AAA development.

Spleen was shown to play an important role as a reservoir for extramedullar hematopoiesis, that had been previously linked to atherosclerosis development. The mobilization of both Ly6Chigh and Ly6Clow monocytes from the spleen in response to Ang II had been reported. B cells were suggested to regulate early monocyte mobilization and promote macrophage accumulation in the AAA through mediation of extramedullary hematopoiesis. Splenectomy prior to Ang II infusion inhibited early monocyte mobilization and protected from AAA.

Cells of adaptive immunity also express ATRs. It has been reported that Ang II stimulation activated inflammatory phenotype in T cells and facilitates their infiltration to adventitia and perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) as well as into the heart. The modulation of adaptive immune activation in hypertension has been attributed to target organ oxidative stress and was suggested to be sex dependent. Although effects of Ang II on T cells have been explored, the role of Ang II in the regulation of B cells in AAA is poorly understood despite AT1R being expressed on B cells.

Ang II was suggested to affect the composition of gut microbiota, and therefore a possible crosstalk between microbiota-inducing cytokines and Ang II during AAA development should be taken into the consideration (Figure 2). Systemically, Ang II was shown to modify plasma and fecal metabolites in conventionally raised mice vs germ-free (GF) animals, suggesting the role of Ang II in the regulation of intestinal epithelial cells and microbiota, possibly in a sex-dependent manner. Despite multiple studies convincingly demonstrating an important role of Ang II in AAA, additional work is needed to better understand the cell specificity of Ang II signaling in this disease.

Microbiota in CVD

Diet, inflammation, aging and increased bone marrow (BM) myeloid cell output all contribute to the development of CVD. Microbiota is a common facilitator for processing and metabolizing food, inducing inflammation and regulating BM output. A connection between unhealthy diet, alterations in bacterial composition in the intestine and CVD has recently emerged. The relationship between dysbiosis and obesity has been suggested, supporting the emerging view that gut microbiota contribute to metabolic disease by modulating host metabolism. Germ free (GF) mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity, with some mechanisms of microbiota modulating inflammation and lipid metabolism suggested. GF mice are characterized by reduced adipose tissue inflammation, while the presence of gut microbiota increases macrophage content in the fat with a polarization toward pro-inflammatory phenotype. Metabolic alterations that contribute to atherosclerosis and possible contribution of gut microbiome to this disease development via altered production of microbial- or food-derived metabolites have been also reported, however more mechanistic studies are needed to demonstrate causative rather than correlative effect.

The composition of the diet was shown to regulate barrier function of the intestine. Hence, intestinal permeability and alterations in the microbial community in the gut are affected by high fat, high carbohydrate “Western diet” and can cause translocation of bacterial products and metabolites, further impacting CVD development. Moreover, microbiota-derived factors can modify activation state of intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) and immune cells. For instance, high fiber diet induced favorable changes in microbiota, and played a protective role in the development of atherosclerosis by controlling acetate (short chain fatty acid) production. Its effects were accompanied by downregulation of Egr1, a master regulator gene involved in cardiac hypertrophy, cardiorenal fibrosis, and inflammation. On the other hand, dietary serves as a substrate for microbiota-catalyzed overproduction of di- and tri-methylamines. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) is a metabolic derivative of L-carnitine and choline; found to be upregulated in patients with CVD, and its serum levels correlate with higher risk of myocardial infarction and atherosclerosis development.

Microbiota and its products also has been shown to influence hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) differentiation and BM output. At the same time, WD was suggested to impact epigenetic reprogramming of granulocyte and monocyte precursor cells in NLRP3 inflammasome dependent manner, skewing bone marrow cell differentiation toward myeloid lineages and enhancing so-called “trained immunity” in atherosclerosis. This reprogramming is maintained even after the switch to chow diet, showing long lasting “trained immunity” induced by WD along with enhanced production of myeloid cells which are later on recruited into CVD lesion sites.

Single-cell RNA sequencing of human AAA tissues revealed increased expression of histone demethylase JMJD3 in aorta infiltrating monocyte and macrophages, resulting in reduction of repressive histone methylation H3K27me3 marks on promoters of inflammatory genes and concomitant upregulation of inflammatory gene expression. Jmjd3 expression was shown to be controlled by IFNβ/JAK/STAT pathway and led to NF-κB-dependent induction of inflammatory gene transcription in aorta-infiltrating macrophages contributing to vascular inflammation. These results suggest that epigenetic modifications could play a modulatory role in the regulation of inflammatory environment in AAA.

Microbiota and AAA

While many studies are focused on the connection between alterations of microbiota and atherosclerosis, its contribution to AAA is far less understood. Change in gut microbiota composition is linked to hypertension in rodents and humans. The relationship between microbiota diversity and AAA severity in humans has been recently reported, and changes in microbiota composition correlated with AAA presence and size. Specifically, a decrease in relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria had been reported in patients with AAA. The relation between AAA size and α-diversity index was inverse, and severity had a positive correlation with increased relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae and decreased abundance of Veillonellaceae. The reduction of the Verrucomicrobia (particularly represented by Akkermansia) was detected in mice infused with Ang II.

Germ-free (GF) mice infused with Ang II were characterized by lower neutrophil infiltration into the aorta, attenuated cardiac and kidney inflammation, fibrosis, and systolic dysfunction. Accordingly, attenuated leukocyte adhesion, lowered infiltration of Ly6G+ neutrophils and Ly6C+ monocytes into the aortic wall, limited endothelial dysfunction and reduction of blood pressure were observed in GF mice subjected to Ang II infusion, indicating possible contribution of gut microbiota to immune cells activation in response to Ang II. A link between normal vascular function and microbiota was directly proven by microbiota depletion. When young GF mice were analyzed for vascular contractility and structure, males and females showed differential response: males showed a marked decrease in contraction of arteries and increased vascular stiffness, while females showed hypertrophic remodeling. Also, ROS generation by neutrophils was blunted in female GF mice and exacerbated in male GF mice.

While several microbiota-derived products and metabolites had been implicated in the regulation of immune cells activation in CVD as described above, most of the studies to date had been focused on atherosclerosis. It remains to be determined whether similar mechanisms are also specifically involved in the pathogenesis of AAA. Here we will briefly discuss microbial metabolites and their role in CVD and possible contribution to AAA.

LPS

LPS is an obligatory component of gram-negative bacteria wall. Elevated levels of LPS can be detected in the circulation as a result of altered gut barrier and increased gut permeability and alteration of microbiota composition. Unhealthy diets can induce gut dysbiosis and alter gut barrier function, thereby contributing to elevated LPS in the circulation. LPS promotes activation of myeloid cells via TLR4/MyD88 pathway, systemic inflammation and monocyte infiltration to vascular wall. The effect could be further exacerbated by combined action with other cardiovascular disease modifying factors. Hence, LPS in combination with oxLDL was shown to induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β production by macrophages that contribute to atherosclerosis development. LPS induces various pro-inflammatory cytokines production including IL-6, TNF as well as Osteopontin (Spp1) by macrophages. Moreover, LPS together with oxLDL was shown to inhibit cholesterol transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1, which in turn affects reverse cholesterol transport. Furthermore, LPS together with TMAO had been demonstrated to enhance Spp1, Il1b, and Cd36 gene expression in the aorta.

In vitro study comparing monocyte-derived macrophages from AAA patients and matched controls showed limited response to LPS due to TLR4 cytosolic internalization, which may be a sign of diminished inflammatory responsiveness, but also may reflect an excessive LPS signaling which resulted in “LPS tolerance”.

TMAO

TMAO (trimethylamine-N-oxide) is produced in the liver from choline and L-carnitine dietary-derived metabolite TMA (trimethylamine) whose production itself requires gut microbiota. TMAO production has been associated with the presence of specific bacterial taxa in the gut, for example Prevotella spp. Elevated serum TMAO was found in individuals with CVD and was implicated into atherosclerosis and thrombosis. In experimental models L-carnitine or choline supplementation to mice led to the upregulation of TMAO and augmented atherosclerosis acting by reducing in vivo cholesterol reverse transport and modifying microbiota. Moreover, no upregulation of TMAO was detected in GF mice despite L-carnitine supplementation, thus no augmentation of atherosclerosis was found, implying an important link between intestinal microbiota, TMAO production and CVD. TMAO had been also implicated into the regulation of platelet hyperreactivity and thrombus formation and these parameters were reduced in the absence of microbiota in GF mice.

The bacterial fermentation products such as lactate and acetate had been shown to regulate storage and metabolism of lipids in intestinal epithelial cells via control of β-oxidation and PPARα pathways. However, not all studies demonstrated a notable effect of microbial products on CVD. For example, one study reported that choline supplementation or WD feeding in conventionally raised and GF mice led to a minor dysbiosis in mice, but the effects on atherosclerosis were only driven by cholesterol levels in plasma. The role of TMAO in AAA has been recently suggested. TMAO added to drinking water promoted AAA development in Ang II and CaCl2 mouse models. This was accompanied by heightened elastin degradation and upregulation of ROS, MMP-2 and 9 and senescence markers in the aorta.

Bile acids

Multiple members of gut microbiota including Clostridium, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus participate in bile acid metabolism through bacterial bile-salt hydrolase (BSH) activity, necessary for the bile acid deconjugation and formation of free bile acids and taurine residues. Decreased bile-salt hydrolase in dysbiotic conditions had been linked to enhanced foam cell formation by upregulation of hepatic FXR (Farnesoid X Receptor) and inhibition of Cyp71a (cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase) and LXR, thus promoting cholesterol accumulation within the liver, intestinal cells and plaque macrophages. Bile acids such as deoxycholic acid (DCA), signal through G protein-coupled BA receptor 1 (TGR5), causing the activation of macrophages and the production of inflammatory cytokines. Interestingly, it was suggested that low concentrations of secondary BA may have anti-inflammatory effects, whereas high concentrations are clearly pro-inflammatory. Ang II infusion to conventional raised mice resulted in upregulation of taurodeoxycholate and taurodeoxycholic acid in feces, while no changes had been observed in GF mice. Taurodeoxycholate has been shown to lower blood pressure in rats, which suggests that microbiota may also exerts beneficial effects in the host as a homeostatic mechanism.

Short chain fatty acids (SCFA)

SCFA including propionate, butyrate and acetate are produced by gut bacteria from dietary fiber. These metabolites can regulate inflammation in intestinal macrophages by signaling through G-protein coupled receptors or by inhibiting histone deacetylases. SCFA also contribute to the expansion of Tregs and IL-10 secretion in colon. The reduction of butyrate producers such as Eubacterium and Roseburia in atherosclerosis had been reported and was associated with increased adhesion of monocytes to the inflamed endothelium, promoting plaque development. Propionate administration in hypertensive Apoe-/- mice lowered systemic inflammation and attenuated hypertension, vascular dysfunction, atherosclerosis and fibrosis. The role of SCFA in the inflammatory environment in AAA remains to be experimentally tested directly. Dietary supplementation of propionate has been suggested for AAA patients, but its actual benefits remain to be determined.

As the relevance of microbiota to CVD emerges the number of identified metabolites will continue to grow. For example, recently Nemet et al. identified the correlation between plasma metabolite phenylacetylglutamine (PAGln) and severity and outcomes of myocardial infarction and stroke. PAGln enhanced platelet activation and thrombosis signaling through G-protein coupled receptors, such as α2A, α2B and β2-adrenergic receptors.

Role of perivascular adipose tissue in AAA development

Perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) is adipose tissue that surrounds the vessels as a distinct layer. As any other adipose tissue PVAT is composed of white and brown adipocytes, and fibroblasts. It is infiltrated by multiple immune cells and heavily innervated. In pro-inflammatory environment or under the conditions of lipid overload, adipocytes become activated and produce pro-inflammatory cytokines (including TNF and IL-6) and adipokines (such as leptin) which further facilitate immune and VSMC cell activation. Increased adiposity and lipid deposition is associated with the shift toward white adipocytes and heightened accumulation of pro-inflammatory immune cell types, for example pro-inflammatory adipose macrophages. In obesity the inflammation in the visceral adipose tissue can be mediated by skewing T helper response from Tregs towards pro-inflammatory T helper subsets, with loss of a unique population of Ly6C+ Tregs normally localized in “lean” adipose tissue. Therefore, increase in white adipose tissue accompanied by low-grade inflammation, PVAT may contribute to AAA development given that it contains higher number of immune cells compared to healthy aortic wall. PVAT is also implicated in the control of vascular tone, however both anti- or pro-contractile effects had been described. Moreover, PVAT was also shown to play a critical role in vascular regulation by local secretion of RAS components, including Ang II, as well as production of other entities which regulate vessels, blood pressure and inflammation, including leptin, IL-6, catecholamines and prostanoids, resistin and adiponectin. Angiotensin and aldosterone are both present in PVAT tissue and modulate endothelial dysfunction as well as immune cell infiltration.

The role of Ang II receptor signaling in adipocytes had been recently suggested. Adipose tissue transplantation from Apoe-/-At1r-/- mice to Apoe-/- mice infused with Ang II attenuated aortic aneurysm formation, macrophage infiltration, osteopontin expression by macrophages and gelatinolytic activity in the abdominal aorta. Levels of ceramides in PVAT correlated with elevated accumulation of macrophages and T cells in human AAA. Indeed, both CD4 and CD8 T cells had been detected in human samples, and activated CD69+ CD4 T cells were present in higher numbers in PVAT than in AAA lesions and their accumulation was dependent on Ang II. B1 cells were also detected in PVAT in human and mouse aorta samples. The effects of microbiota and circulating metabolites on PVAT that can further transpire to affect AAA are largely unknown and will remain a subject of future studies.

Perspective

During the past decade the contribution of immune cells to the pathogenesis of AAA became evident and different immune cells had been found in AAA lesions. Some mechanistic studies provided evidence regarding the role of immune cells in AAA pathogenesis. However, the specific contribution of immune cell subsets remains poorly understood and warrants future studies using cell type specific knockouts and more physiologically relevant models. Remaining questions include the understanding of the dynamic of immune cell accumulation and their contribution at early or more advanced stages of the disease. For example, it would be very interesting to determine experimentally whether initial steps of AAA development are actually mediated by recruited neutrophils (and monocytes) or they are only responders to the injury of the aorta generated by other factors. The spatiotemporal changes in cell lineage plasticity (for macrophages, neutrophils or VSMC) will be further addressed through in depth multiproteomic phenotyping and next generation single cell RNA sequencing. These approaches are also great for in depth mechanistic studies of samples derived from human AAA patients.

Better understanding of the mechanisms regulating immune cells activation and accumulation in AAA would provide an important knowledge for therapeutic interventions and likely will allow consideration of new preventive approaches. While the role of microbiota alterations had been implicated to the control of chronic inflammatory diseases including atherosclerosis, the field still gathers and catalogues data on the roles and mechanisms of microbiota action in AAA. A particular interest may represent a focus on the effect of diets and food additives that had been demonstrated to impact microbiota composition and function as well as affect immune cells and inflammatory responses. Future mechanistic studies focusing on interplay between microbiota, metabolites and immune cells during AAA initiation and progression will be of a great interest and potential translational importance.

Several models of AAA development in rodents had been developed and widely used in experimental studies, however they are not fully reflecting human pathology and frequently provide opposite results which are likely related to the nature and limitations of the models. The immune cell responses and requirements for specific immune subsets or mediators may vary between the models. It would be important to take into the account chronic inflammatory nature of AAA as well as contribution of systemic factors such as microbiome when experiments are designed and interpreted.

Overall, understanding of novel immune mediated mechanisms regulating AAA development and factors driving pathogenic immune cell activation will pave the road for novel therapeutics and preventive approaches in AAA and other CVDs, therefore representing an exciting area of research for future studies.

Author contributions

AM-S prepared the Figures, AM-S and EK wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The work was supported by NIH R01 HL133669, R01 HL149946 and NCI R01 CA273925 grants to EK.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. S. Grivennikov for critical reading of the manuscript. Figures were created with BioRender.com.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References 265

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  48. 48.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  49. 49.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.
  52. 52.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  68. 68.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  69. 69.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  70. 70.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  71. 71.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  74. 74.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  78. 78.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  81. 81.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  87. 87.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  88. 88.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  90. 90.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  92. 92.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  94. 94.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  97. 97.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  98. 98.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  99. 99.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  101. 101.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  102. 102.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  105. 105.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  106. 106.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  108. 108.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  109. 109.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  110. 110.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  112. 112.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  113. 113.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  114. 114.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  115. 115.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  116. 116.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  117. 117.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  118. 118.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  119. 119.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  120. 120.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  121. 121.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  123. 123.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  124. 124.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  126. 126.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  127. 127.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  128. 128.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  129. 129.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  131. 131.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  132. 132.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  134. 134.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  135. 135.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  136. 136.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  137. 137.
  138. 138.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  139. 139.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  140. 140.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  141. 141.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  142. 142.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  143. 143.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  144. 144.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  145. 145.
  146. 146.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  147. 147.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  150. 150.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  151. 151.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  152. 152.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  153. 153.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  155. 155.
  156. 156.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  157. 157.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  158. 158.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  159. 159.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  160. 160.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  161. 161.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  162. 162.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  163. 163.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  164. 164.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  165. 165.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  166. 166.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  167. 167.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  168. 168.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  169. 169.
  170. 170.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  171. 171.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  172. 172.
  173. 173.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  174. 174.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  175. 175.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  176. 176.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  177. 177.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  178. 178.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  179. 179.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  180. 180.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  181. 181.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  182. 182.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  183. 183.
  184. 184.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  185. 185.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  186. 186.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  187. 187.
  188. 188.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  189. 189.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  190. 190.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  191. 191.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  192. 192.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  193. 193.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  194. 194.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  195. 195.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  196. 196.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  197. 197.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  198. 198.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  199. 199.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  200. 200.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  201. 201.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  202. 202.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  203. 203.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  204. 204.
  205. 205.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  206. 206.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  207. 207.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  208. 208.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  209. 209.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  210. 210.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  211. 211.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  212. 212.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  213. 213.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  214. 214.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  215. 215.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  216. 216.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  217. 217.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  218. 218.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  219. 219.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  220. 220.
  221. 221.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  222. 222.
  223. 223.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  224. 224.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  225. 225.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  226. 226.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  227. 227.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  228. 228.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  229. 229.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  230. 230.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  231. 231.
  232. 232.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  233. 233.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  234. 234.
  235. 235.
  236. 236.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  237. 237.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  238. 238.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  239. 239.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  240. 240.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  241. 241.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  242. 242.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  243. 243.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  244. 244.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  245. 245.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  246. 246.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  247. 247.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  248. 248.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  249. 249.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  250. 250.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  251. 251.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  252. 252.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  253. 253.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  254. 254.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  255. 255.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  256. 256.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  257. 257.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  258. 258.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  259. 259.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  260. 260.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  261. 261.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  262. 262.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  263. 263.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  264. 264.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  265. 265.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.