No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
Microbial dysbiosis in the gut drives systemic autoimmune diseases
Walaa K. Mousa, Fadia Chehadeh, Shannon Husband
Frontiers in Immunology · 2022 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
Trillions of microbes survive and thrive inside the human body. These tiny creatures are crucial to the development and maturation of our immune system and to maintain gut immune homeostasis. Microbial dysbiosis is the main driver of local inflammatory and autoimmune diseases such as colitis and inflammatory bowel diseases. Dysbiosis in the gut can also drive systemic autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes, rheumatic arthritis, and multiple sclerosis. Gut microbes directly interact with the immune system by multiple mechanisms including modulation of the host microRNAs affecting gene expression at the post-transcriptional level or production of microbial metabolites that interact with cellular receptors such as TLRs and GPCRs. This interaction modulates crucial immune functions such as differentiation of lymphocytes, production of interleukins, or controlling the leakage of inflammatory molecules from the gut to the systemic circulation. In this review, we compile and analyze data to gain insights into the underpinning mechanisms mediating systemic autoimmune diseases. Understanding how gut microbes can trigger or protect from systemic autoimmune diseases is crucial to (1) tackle these diseases through diet or lifestyle modification, (2) develop new microbiome-based therapeutics such as prebiotics or probiotics, (3) identify diagnostic biomarkers to predict disease risk, and (4) observe and intervene with microbial population change with the flare-up of autoimmune responses. Considering the microbiome signature as a crucial player in systemic autoimmune diseases might hold a promise to turn these untreatable diseases into manageable or preventable ones.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
The gastrointestinal tract is home to trillions of diverse microbial species including bacteria, viruses, and fungi. To colonize the human body, these microbes interact with the immune system to develop tolerance and maintain gut homeostasis. Gut microbes, or their secreted metabolites, directly interact with gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALTs), which include Peyer’s patches, mesenteric lymph nodes, intraepithelial lymphocytes, lamina propria, and isolated lymphoid follicles. This interaction is mediated through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), leading to induction of immune cell differentiations, setting the balance between helper T cells and regulatory T cells. Moreover, gut microbes modulate genes involved in maintaining the mucosal barrier function such as those involved in the synthesis of the tight junctions and formation of mucin barrier.
Gut microbes could also modulate host genes through microRNAs (miRNAs), short non-coding RNA sequences that silence gene expression. Host-derived miRNAs serve an essential function to control microbial population abundance by directly affecting microbial gene expression and mucosal colonization. Microbes, or their secreted metabolites, modulate miRNAs affecting host genes. The affected host genes include those linked to differentiation of T cells, production of interleukins, proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells, gut permeability, and autophagy process. Selected examples of miRNAs mediating host–microbe interactions leading to or preventing inflammation are noted and summarized ( Table 1 ).
Microbial dysbiosis disturbs the immune function leading to inflammation and sensitization of the immune system and causing autoimmune diseases. Many factors influence microbial dysbiosis such as diet, stress, drugs, diseases, age, and lifestyle. The imbalance in helper T cells/regulatory T cells drives autoimmune diseases such as colitis and multiple sclerosis (MS). Leakage of metabolites such as lipopolysaccharides sensitizes the immune system, leading to a higher production of pro-inflammatory interleukins, and degradation of mucin resulting in irritation of the gut lining and microbial invasion. Figure 1 illustrates the role of some microbial taxa in maintaining gut barrier function and how microbial dysbiosis results in a leaky gut. Each microbe prevents or drives inflammation by a unique mechanism. For example, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii prevents inflammation by inducing Treg differentiation, leading to the subsequent higher production of IL-10 (an anti-inflammatory interleukin). In contrast, Fusobacterium nucleatum drives inflammation by inhibiting cytotoxic T cells and modulation of miRNAs, leading to suppression of autophagy. Several examples of individual microbes that modulate host immune response to prevent or drive inflammation and autoimmune reaction are noted and summarized ( Table 2 ).
Microbial dysbiosis drives systemic autoimmune diseases
Microbial dysbiosis is strongly linked to local inflammation and autoimmune diseases in the gut such as Crohn’s and inflammatory bowel diseases. However, much less is known about the link between dysbiosis in the gut and systemic autoimmune diseases. Evidence suggests that gut microbes exert some control over the systemic immune response, particularly innate immunity. To induce immune tolerance to commensal microbes, the antigens of the gut microbes are sampled by dendritic cells (DCs) and presented to T cells in the pancreatic lymph nodes (PLNs). Sometimes, T cells activated by microbial antigen fragments spread and trigger a systemic immune response. Additionally, some microbial metabolites might leak from the gut barrier to other tissues or organs. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) suppress neutrophil function via binding to GPCRs while microbial peptidoglycans stimulate neutrophil function via Nod1. Here, we discuss links between microbial dysbiosis and some systemic autoimmune diseases including type 1 diabetes (T1D), Multiple Sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
The role of microbial dysbiosis in triggering type 1 diabetes
T1D is a systemic autoimmune disease that is linked to microbial dysbiosis. Preclinical and clinical T1D is mostly associated with GIT pathogenesis, such as celiac disease or increased intestinal leakage potentially due to microbial dysbiosis. Multiple studies report significant shifts in gut microbes including bacteria, viruses, and fungi before the onset of T1D as reviewed. Figure 2 illustrates the balanced microbial interaction that contributes to glucose metabolism and suppresses hyperglycemia.
A study on mice reported that cytophaga-flavobacter-bacteroidetes (CFB) affects Th17/Treg balance, which is crucial for immune homeostasis, leading to autoimmune diseases. CFB induces Th17 differentiation, and its absence is associated with induction of Treg cells in the lamina propria, and this effect is diminished after selective antibiotic treatment. Another study reported an enrichment in Bacteriodetes dorei with preclinical or clinical T1D. B. dorei produces LPS that induces the innate immune response. The abundance of Desulfovibrio piger is associated with a higher level of plasma 1-arachidonoyl-GPC, a metabolite known to negatively affect CD4+, CXCR3+, CD8+, and CXCR3+ T cells, preventing further progression of autoimmunity. A similar effect of this metabolite is reported in mice. D. piger is also known to produce hydrogen sulfide, which affects T cells and immune response.
A study reported that T1D patients show enrichment in Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes and lack of butyrate-producing bacteria. Knowing that butyrate induces mucin formation and assembly of tight junction explains the increased gut permeability in T1D patients. T1D microbiota is also deficient in Provetella species that break down mucin and enriched in bacteria that produce propionates and acetates known to impair neutrophil functions observed in T1D patients. Other evidence suggests that microbial dysbiosis alters the gut immunity, resulting in excessive stimulation of inflammatory response leading to T1D even without an observable change in gut permeability. For example, a study reported that T1D patients show a high expression level of intercellular adhesion molecule-1, HLA-DR, HLA-DP, IL-4, and IL-1α-positive cells. Another study showed that DCs are not able to induce FoxP3+Treg cell differentiation in T1D patients. The authors claimed that the deficiency of Treg cells in the gut decreases the ability of the immune system to tolerate and discriminate self-antigens in the pancreatic β-cells.
A mouse model of T1D has a reduction in IL-22, IL-17A, and IL-23A that is associated with loss of segmented filamentous bacteria. This alteration is reversed by treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs, suggesting that dysbiosis is linked to inflammation rather than to T1D. Another study shows that the immunomodulatory compound, indole-3-carbinol, binds to aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in NOD mice. AhR is a transcription factor that prevents T1D. Interestingly, this activation was mainly localized to the small intestine. Meanwhile, no alteration was observed in the differentiation of T cells in the spleen or PLNs. These changes were associated with a signature trans-kingdom network characterized by a reduction in ruminiclostridium, intestinimonas, and lachnospiraceae mediated by an increase in CD25. A study found that prediabetes in rats is associated with enrichment in Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Bacteroides species and antibiotic treatment decreased the incidence of T1D. Other research shows that Lactobacillus bifidus can activate the autoimmune response in IL-1 receptor antagonist-knockout mice.
Mice that are deficient in MyD88, a specific adapter molecule involved in TLRs signaling pathways, are protected from T1D in the presence of a microbiome signature characterized by a richness in Lactobacillus genera and low Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio. Interestingly, Lactobacillus shows protection against T1D while Bacillus cereus delayed the onset of T1D in NOD mice. Metagenomic analysis revealed that stool samples from T1D patients are enriched in genes responsible for bacterial adhesion and flagella formation that are possibly involved in triggering systemic immune response. T1D patients are also deficient in butyrate producers and mucin-degrading bacteria.
Preclinical T1D is also associated with a reduction in butyrate-producing genera such as Roseburia. When dietary fibers (DF) intake is limited, gut microbes degrade mucin to increase the supply of butyrate. Mucin degradation increases gut permeability and immunogenicity leading to T1D. Butyrate modulates susceptibility to T1D through a variety of possible mechanisms such as upregulation of tight junction proteins. Butyrate enhances differentiation of Treg cells through histone H3 acetylation and induces apoptosis of proinflammatory T cells in the murine cell line. Another study shows that Akkermansia sp., a butyrate producer, protects against pancreatic autoimmunity. Butyrate promotes Th1 differentiation through induction of IFN-γ and T-bet expression by inhibition of histone deacetylase. Butyrate inhibits Th17 differentiation through suppression of Rorα, Rorγt, and IL-17. The literature shows mixed results for the effect of oral administrations of butyrate on the development of T1D in humans versus experimental animals.
Several reports suggest that viral infections can trigger or attenuate the development of T1D or pancreatic autoimmunity, particularly infection with rotavirus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and enterovirus, although the underpinning mechanisms are not well-understood. Several findings in experimental animals, particularly NOD mice, suggest that the viruses affect T1D development by molecular mimicry or bystander inflammation. Molecular mimicry is reported for molecules such as glutamic acid decarboxylase enzyme, tyrosine phosphatase IA-2/IAR, and heat shock protein 60. For example, Coxsackievirus B4 (CVB4) triggers T1D by mimicry to host-related molecules such as beta-cell glutamic acid decarboxylase enzyme 65. Interestingly, the adequate response of pancreatic B cells to interferon-gamma reduced CVB4-induced T1D. Another hypothesis is that the virome induces pancreatic bystander inflammation, which involves the inability of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes to recognize self-antigens of the pancreatic beta cells. Interestingly, there are some reports of viral infections linked to less incidence of T1D such as CXADR rs6517774, Mastadeno-virus C, and Norovirus-4. In the NOD mouse model, infection with mouse Norovirus-4 (MNV4) is associated with enrichment in the alpha diversity of gut bacteria and expansion of Treg cells. To examine if the effect of MNV4 on immunity is due to indirect modulation of the gut microbes, the authors repeated the experiment on germ-free mice. Interestingly, germ-free mice infected with MNV4 still show modulation of the immune response including an increase in Treg and alteration in cellular and secreted components of the immune system such as B cells, T cells, macrophages, and cytokine biomarkers.
Dysbiosis in the virome is also associated with several autoimmune diseases including T1D. The virome is the collection of endogenous retroviruses, eukaryotic viruses, and bacteriophages inhabiting the gut microbiota. Most of the gut viruses are sourced from lysogens; the latter is defined as bacteria containing dormant phages (prophages) inserted in the bacterial genomes. These phages are released from the lysogens upon receiving particular signals, including a change in diet, and further affect microbiome structure and susceptibility to autoimmune diseases. Prophages might encode immune-modulatory molecules that directly affect the immune system response. For example, the novel prophage ΦHKU.vir encodes toxin with superantigens that enable colonization of S. pyogenes by inducing nonspecific differentiation of T cells. The virome and host–disease associations are much less studied compared to the gut microbiome. Moreover, the literature shows mixed results and a non-confirmed link between virome shift and T1D. The main challenge in understanding virome interaction is that it directly affects bacterial population dynamics and diversity, increasing confounding factors and making it hard to draw a confirmed conclusion. Phage infection of gnotobiotic mice, inoculated with defined human microbes, resulted in direct reduction of the susceptible species and indirect effect on the other species likely through interspecies interactions. Another study reported an association between the initial abundance of amyloid-producing E. coli and E. coli bacteriophage/E. coli ratio, which results in depletion of E. coli, in the development of T1D.
In summary, many studies investigate the role of microbial dysbiosis in triggering T1D through a variety of mechanisms such as modulation of Th17/Treg balance, variation in interleukin production, and change in gut permeability. These effects are mediated by some microbial metabolites such as butyrate, LPS, and arachidonoyl-GPC. Activation of latent viral infections can also drive microbial dysbiosis leading to T1D. However, less is known about microbial dysbiosis in late-onset T1D and if diet management can modulate disease severity or progression. A study reported an enrichment in Veillonella and Clostridium genera coupled with a reduction in Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Prevotella in the pediatric T1D compared to healthy children. Another study reported similar results in adults, particularly the Bifidobacterium signature. However, all studies investigating the association between late-onset T1D and microbiota shift lack directionality as T1D is thought to drive microbiota change as the diseases progress.
The role of microbial dysbiosis in triggering multiple sclerosis
MS is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting 2.8 million people around the world. MS causes demyelination of neurons, leading to neuroaxonal degeneration in the brain and spinal cord, resulting in an unpredictable outcome that can result in a permanent disability. Although there is no cure for MS, some interventions can improve the quality of life and reduce complications such as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, which destroy circulating memory B cells and subsequently weaken the immune system and increase the risk of infection. The underlying causes are largely unknown and thought to be linked to genetic factors and/or viral infection. Figure 3 illustrates the potential role of gut dysbiosis in MS, although the directionality of this interaction is not clear. Gut microbes are definitely altered in MS patients, and this alteration is associated with the varied severity of the disease. The microbiome signature in MS patients is characterized by the lower abundance of F. prausnitzii, Prevotella, and Bacteroides, and a higher abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila. Pediatric MS patients show a signature reduction in SCFA-producing Ruminococcaceae compared to healthy children. However, the directionality of this association is not clear. Moreover, MS-modifying drugs can alter the microbiota composition. Administration of dimethyl fumarate and glatiramer acetate resulted in a significant reduction in Lachnospiraceae and Veillonellaceae.
Mechanistically, some evidence suggests the role of miRNAs such as miR-141, miR-200a, and miR-155 in driving MS by shifting Th17/Treg balance towards the Th17 side, promoting production of the proinflammatory mediator IL17 ( Table 1 ). These miRNAs are implicated in interfering with repressor proteins that regulate Th17 differentiation. As microbes regulate miRNAs, there is a hope that probiotics, antibiotics, or specialized microbial metabolites might suppress Th17 production or induce Treg differentiation by checking MS progression. Another possible mechanism of how microbial dysbiosis drives MS might be through molecular mimicry. Studies on neuromyelitis optica, a degenerative autoimmune disease that results in inflammation, demyelination, and nerve necrosis, suggest a possible molecular mimicry between brain and microbial antigens. Neuromyelitis optica is characterized by the presence of IgG1 autoantibodies that attack aquaporin 4 (AQP4), a predominant water channel in the CNS. This attack results in deposition of immunoglobulin complements causing demyelination and tissue damage. The mechanism involves a molecular mimicry between AQP4 and ABC transporter permease in the gut microbe, Clostridium perfringens.
Transfer of microbiota from MS patients to mice elicits an immune response and inflammation. Opposing this finding, another research shows that the transfer of microbiota from a mouse model of MS to another healthy mouse resulted in disease protection thanks to miR-30d. The unexpected effects of this miR could be attributed to its stimulatory effect on the growth of Akkermansia muciniphila, which exhibits an anti-inflammatory role. Another possible mechanism for MS protection might be the induction of anti-inflammatory Treg cells. Other cohort studies show enrichment in Eggerthella lenta and Akkermansia muciniphila in MS patients. MS patients show an increase in anti-A muciniphila immunoglobulin G while no difference in IgG is noted for other gut microbiota such as Bacteroides fragilis, Fusobacterium, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Other studies suggest that certain gut microbiota such as A. muciniphila interacts with spore-forming bacteria to escalate the inflammation leading to MS through a direct effect on T lymphocytes. Breakthrough research reported that some gut microbiome taxa enriched in MS patients directly interact with IgA-producing cells at the gut lining; the latter translocate to the brain cells and locally produce immunoglobulin A (IgA), which mediates severe inflammation. MS patients show a signature decrease in Prevotella genera compared to healthy control. Although this association lacks directionality, it varies depending on the disease severity. This finding raises the possibility of using probiotics to manage brain inflammation in MS. A study shows that supplementation of Prevotella histicola suppressed autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in the HLA-DR3.DQ8 transgenic mouse model. This model expresses HLA-DR3 and DQ8 genes and can develop EAE, a severe spinal cord and brain inflammation that is very comparable to MS in human. In a follow-up study, the authors found that treatment with P. histicola yielded a similar disease-suppression effect as the MS drug Copaxone. However, co-administration of both P. histicola and Copaxone does not provide a synergic effect. Copaxone acts by decreasing the response of antigenic T cells in the brain. Data show that treatment with P. histicola increased the level of regulatory T cells and decreased proinflammatory cells, particularly those producing IL-17 and IFN-γ. Interestingly, a study shows that microbial transplant from MS patients developed EAE in transgenic mice. These results are a promising development to microbiome-based therapeutics for autoimmune diseases. However, some preclinical data claim that the beneficial effects of probiotics in delaying MS progression are likely through indirect anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory activity.
A recent study suggests a strong link between lung microbiome dysbiosis and MS in rats. Microbiome shift to a less lipopolysaccharide-producing phyla escalates MS while its enrichment decreases the proinflammatory response. The mechanistic underpinning is impairment in the responsiveness of microglial cells in the brain to type II interferons, resulting in a reduced recruitment of immune cells and further clinical manifestations.
Activation of latent Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection is linked to the development of MS. EBV is a common virus that is considered part of the commensal microbiome. EBV infects B cells and epithelial cells, and because it shares molecular mimicry to some host protein, the viral genome integrates within the host DNA. When triggered, by yet unknown signals, it can lead to systemic autoimmune diseases. A recent study shows that EBV antibodies are associated with 99% of MS cases with the US military. The authors identified a strong positive association between MS and EBV where EBV infection increases the risk of developing MS by 32% and MS only develops after EBV infection. If EBV is truly a prerequisite to MS, this discovery holds the promise of turning these untreatable diseases into vaccine-preventable ones.
The role of microbial dysbiosis in triggering rheumatoid arthritis
RA is a systemic autoimmune disease affecting joints, and sometimes other internal organs, causing inflammation and swelling. One of the first reports of the connection between microbial dysbiosis and RA dates back to 1979 with the discovery that germ-free rats are 100% susceptible to developing RA upon injection of an intradermal adjuvant, while conventional rats are only 0 to 20% susceptible and further develop weak or delayed inflammation. Interestingly, this induced inflammation is resolved by inoculation of E. coli and slightly worsens by inoculation of Lactobacilli. The authors claimed a possible role of the LPS of E. coli in resolving RA. Studies show that the microbiome in RA patients is enriched in specific microbial taxa such as Provetella, Lactobacillus sabotage, and segmented filamentous bacteria. Higher abundances of these microbes increase their proinflammatory metabolites such as serum amyloid protein A, which increases the production of Th1 and Th17 that migrate systemically and contribute to the diseases. Some members of the Provetella genus are implicated in several inflammatory and autoimmune conditions that range from low-grade inflammation to periodontitis, bacterial vaginosis, and RA.
A growing body of research suggests a possible role of Provetella copri in the development of RA. Mechanistically, the ability of Prevotella copri to induce mucosal inflammation is due to the activation of TLR-2 stimulating the differentiation of Th17 and leading to the excessive production of proinflammatory interleukins such as IL-23 and IL-1 and the recruitment of neutrophils. This inflammation increases gut permeability and leakage of microbes and proinflammatory molecules, leading to more systemic inflammation and immune reaction. A higher abundance of P. copri is also associated with RA in mice with knocked out NLRP6 gene, a proinflammatory gene that is part of the inflammasome. These mice are genetically modified to produce lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Co-housing of wild-type and knockout mice resulted in inflammatory symptoms in the wild type and suggests that gut microbes can induce autoimmune diseases even without a genetic predisposition. This finding also suggests a possible role of Provetella in arthritis etiology as a pathobiont, and it could be potentially used as a diagnostic biomarker for RA. Prevotella intestinalis is another member of the family implicated in intestinal inflammation and particularly colitis through a reduction in SCFAs and the anti-inflammatory interleukin IL-18 in mice. Other studies show that P. histicola has anti-inflammatory activity and can protect mice from arthritis. Interestingly, the mechanism of inflammation suppression looks opposite to that induced by other pathobionts from the same genus. The authors show that P. histicola regulates DCs (CD103+), resulting in the generation of Treg cells, which suppresses Th17, decreasing proinflammatory interleukins, and increasing anti-inflammatory interleukins such as IL-10. In addition, P. histicola upregulates the production of the tight junction protein, which decreases gut permeability. These findings suggest a potential application of P. histicola as a probiotic for arthritis and possibly other autoimmune diseases. Figure 4 illustrates the paradoxical activities of P. copri and P. histicola in mediating RA.
The role of microbial dysbiosis in triggering systemic lupus erythematosus
SLE is an autoimmune disease that affects joints, blood, kidney, and other organs with yet an elusive etiology. The hallmark of SLE is the formation and deposition of immune complexes from the production of autoantibodies directed towards nuclear antigen and could be detected several years before the onset of the disease. This autoimmune attack results in inflammation and organ failure. The mechanism beyond stimulation of autoreactive T cells and autoantibody production is still unclear, but various theories exist such as genetic deposition or environmental factors exhibiting molecular mimicry. This inflammation is increasingly believed to be attributed to an imbalance in Th17 and Treg cells, leading to a higher production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-17, IL-22, and IL-23 that drive systemic inflammation. Evidently, a high level of IL-17-producing cells is reported to infiltrate tissues of kidney, lung, and skin of SLE patients, resulting in organ damage. Understanding the role of the human microbiota in driving, intensifying, or preventing SLE is gaining intriguing interest. A unique gut microbiota signature is reported with the inflammatory flares and as the disease progresses. This signature is characterized by a reduction in microbiota diversity with enrichment in some genera such as Campylobacter, Streptococcus, and Veillonella, and depletion of others such as Bifidobacterium. A significantly low abundance of Lactobacillus and an increase in Lachnospiraceae are associated with SLE in mice. The enrichment in Lachnospiraceae is gender-specific, with more abundance in females, which increases the disease’s severity. Interestingly, lupus-susceptible mice showed enrichment in the metabolic pathways of motility and sporulation genes, which might be linked to the ability of microbes to cause systemic inflammation. Restoration of lactobacilli abundance by feeding retinoic acid resulted in improved symptoms of lupus, suggesting a potential role of lactobacilli in preventing or counteracting inflammation. Studies reported a shift in Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio accompanied by a change in SCFAs and Th17 levels in serum of SEL patients. The shifted microbiota in SEL is characterized by an imbalance in the Treg/Th17/Th1 ratio. Specifically, two strains from the genus Clostridium drive an imbalance in Th17/Th1, promoting differentiation of CD4+ lymphocytes into Th17 and resulting in inflammation. Bifidobacterium bifidum inhibits the excessive stimulation of CD4+ lymphocytes. Other studies show that microbiota translocation might be implemented in triggering autoimmune diseases including SLE. A study showed that translocation of Enterococcus gallinarum from the gut to the liver resulted in overproduction of autoimmune antibodies, inflammation, and mortality in genetically susceptible mice. While antibiotic treatment aimed to eradicate E. gallinarum, it also eliminated the autoantibodies in mice. Interestingly DNA of E. gallinarum recovered from the liver of autoimmune patients induced proinflammation in human hepatocytes mimicking the interaction in mice. Activation of latent EBV infection is also linked to the development of SLE. The tumorigenic activity of EBV might resonate with its ability to evade the immune system. Antigens of EBV share molecular mimicry to SLE antigens, which leads to an autoimmune response during EBV activation. Furthermore, EBV suppresses the anti-inflammatory interleukins, resulting in more systemic inflammation. A trial EBV peptide vaccine in experimental animals generated cross-reactive antibodies and caused SLE-like symptoms. Although EBV is known to induce a transit increase in autoantibodies and inflammation, some studies show that this inflammation can further escalate and spread systemically.
Microbiome-based therapeutics for tackling autoimmune diseases
The prevalence of autoimmune diseases and allergies especially in children increased 40% over the last decade, resulting from the change in lifestyles such as diet, stress, and pollution. These changes result in a significant shift in microbiome composition. A recent study reported a strain-level significant microbiome signature in pediatric allergy characterized by a higher abundance of Ruminococcus gnavus, which is enriched in genes for the production of proinflammatory polysaccharides and lowers the potential for fiber-degrading enzymes. An interesting study shows that gut microbes drive sex-biased regulation of autoimmunity by directly regulating serum testosterone in NOD mice. The authors show that an elevated testosterone level protects against T1D in male mice, and this protection is transferable to immature female mice by microbiome transplant. Another interesting study suggests that gut fungi induce behavioral change in mice through stimulation of immune response mediated by IL17, which binds to receptors in the brain.
Manipulating the virome to control autoimmune diseases
One of the striking findings is the ability of some gut viruses of the Iridoviridae family to produce insulin-like molecules that mimic host insulin by 50% and can form the critical 3D molecules needed to bind and activate the insulin receptors. Interestingly, these viruses are primarily sequenced from fish and recently have been identified in human fecal genomes. Recent studies show that the presence of LCDV-Sa is a risk factor for developing T1D in children. However, it is unclear if the presence of these insulin-mimic molecules helps to trigger diabetes or protect from diabetes. Previous studies show that microbial metabolites that mimic the host-derived molecules can trigger an immune reaction against insulin-producing cells resulting in T1D. Although we know much about the structural diversity of the microbiome bacteria, relatively much less research has been done on the human virome. A recent study identified 1,700 viral species in the gut microbiome. However, to date, only 2% of viruses are sequenced. This makes the virome research and its association with human diseases a very exciting area of development that will certainly advance our understanding of the microbe’s host interaction and association with human diseases. The use of phages to modulate the microbiome is still an unexplored avenue with unpredicted interspecies interactions.
Tackling autoimmune diseases by microbial transplant or microbial metabolites
A study shows that germ-free mice remain immune-compromised even if they are colonized with animal or human microbiota. An interesting approach is the fecal transplant of gut microbes from a healthy donor to patients with autoimmune diseases. A randomized controlled clinical trial shows that fecal microbial transplant in newly diagnosed T1D patients prevents the further decline of insulin production by stabilizing the pancreatic B cells’ function. This effect is associated with a shift in plasma microbial metabolites, autoreactive T cells, and gene expression of the intestine. This trial not only provides hope for microbiome-based interventions for the treatment of autoimmune diseases but also provides solid evidence that microbiota dysbiosis drives T1D. Another possible scenario is the use of critical microbial metabolites such as butyrate as a supplement. Since butyrate has a protective role against autoimmunity, a diet rich in butyrate might dial down the autoimmune reaction. A study in NOD mice shows that butyrate and acetate supplementation decreased inflammation and might be a good candidate for therapeutic interventions to control autoimmune diseases such as T1D.
Conclusion
Each living organism requires specific microbial species that are coevolved to prime the immune system. Changing the microbiome structure impairs important functions such as (1) gut permeability leading to leakage of antigens and inflammatory mediators to the blood circulation, (2) inability to produce anti-inflammatory microbial metabolites or to degrade food, and (3) loss of immune homeostasis leading to allergy and autoimmune reactions. Understanding how gut microbes drive or suppress autoimmune diseases is crucial to developing innovative microbiome-based diagnostic tools and therapeutics.
Author contributions
SH and FC collected data on multiple sclerosis. WM curated all data; reviewed the literature; critically analyzed the current knowledge, gaps, challenges, and future directions; designed/developed tables and figures; and wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work is supported by a start-up fund from Whitman College and the Murdock Foundation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References 186
- 1.
Ursell LK Metcalf JL Parfrey LW Knight R. Defining the human microbiome. Nutr Rev (2012 ) 70(Suppl 1):S38–44
Not in our library10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00493.x
- 2.
Li M Chen W-D Wang Y-D. The roles of the gut microbiota–MiRNA interaction in the host pathophysiology. Mol Med (2020 ) 26(1):101
Not in our library10.1186/s10020-020-00234-7
- 3.
Hornung B Martins dos Santos VAP Smidt H Schaap PJ. Studying microbial functionality within the gut ecosystem by systems biology. Genes Nutr (2018 ) 13(1):5
Not in our library10.1186/s12263-018-0594-6
- 4.
He B Xu W Santini PA Polydorides AD Chiu A Estrella J. Intestinal bacteria trigger T cell-independent immunoglobulin A(2) class switching by inducing epithelial-cell secretion of the cytokine APRIL. Immunity (2007 ) 26(6):812–26
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.014
- 5.
Wu H-J Wu E. The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity. Gut Microbes (2012 ) 3(1):4–14
Not in our library10.4161/gmic.19320
- 6.
- 7.
Hooper LV Wong MH Thelin A Hansson L Falk PG Gordon JI. Molecular analysis of commensal host-microbial relationships in the intestine. Science (2001 ) 291(5505):881–4
Not in our library10.1126/science.291.5505.881
- 8.
Johansson MEV Phillipson M Petersson J Velcich A Holm L Hansson GC. The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2008 ) 105(39):15064–9
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0803124105
- 9.
- 10.
Rupaimoole R Slack FJ. MicroRNA therapeutics: Towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2017 ) 16(3):203–22
Not in our library10.1038/nrd.2016.246
- 11.
Okamura K Ladewig E Zhou L Lai EC. Functional small RNAs are generated from select MiRNA hairpin loops in flies and mammals. Genes Dev (2013 ) 27(7):778–92
Not in our library10.1101/gad.211698.112
- 12.
Tarallo S Ferrero G Gallo G Francavilla A Clerico G Realis LA. Altered fecal small RNA profiles in colorectal cancer reflect gut microbiome composition in stool samples. mSystems 4(5):e00289-19
Not in our library10.1128/msystems.00289-19
- 13.
Thomas H. Gut microbiota: Host faecal MiRNA regulates gut microbiota. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2016 ) 13(3):122–3
Not in our library10.1038/nrgastro.2016.19
- 14.
Viennois E Chassaing B Tahsin A Pujada A Wang L Gewirtz AT. Host- derived fecal MicroRNAs can indicate gut microbiota healthiness and ability to induce inflammation. Theranostics (2019 ) 9(15):4542–57
Not in our library10.7150/thno.35282
- 15.
Bi K Zhang X Chen W Diao H. MicroRNAs regulate intestinal immunity and gut microbiota for gastrointestinal health: A comprehensive review. Genes (2020 ) 11
Not in our library10.3390/genes11091075
- 16.
Singh N Shirdel EA Waldron L Zhang R-H Jurisica I Comelli EM. The murine caecal MicroRNA signature depends on the presence of the endogenous microbiota. Int J Biol Sci (2012 ) 8(2):171–86
Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.8.171
- 17.
Xue X Feng T Yao S Wolf KJ Liu C-G Liu X. Microbiota downregulates dendritic cell expression of MiR-10a, which targets IL-12/IL-23p40. J Immunol Baltim. Md 1950 (2011 ) 187(11):5879–86
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1100535
- 18.
Bi K Zhang X Chen W Diao H. MicroRNAs regulate intestinal immunity and gut microbiota for gastrointestinal health: A comprehensive review. Genes (2020 ) 11(9)
Not in our library10.3390/genes11091075
- 19.
Peck BCE Mah AT Pitman WA Ding S Lund PK Sethupathy P. FunctionalTranscriptomics in diverse intestinal epithelial cell types reveals robust MicroRNA sensitivity in intestinal stem cells to microbial status. J Biol Chem (2017 ) 292(7):2586–600
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m116.770099
- 20.
- 21.
Li M Chen W-D Wang Y-D. The roles of the gut microbiota–MiRNA interaction in the host pathophysiology. Mol Med (2020 ) 26(1):101
Not in our library10.1186/s10020-020-00234-7
- 22.
Ji Y Li X Zhu Y Li N Zhang N Niu M. Faecal MicroRNA as a biomarker of the activity and prognosis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2018 ) 503(4):2443–50
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.174
- 23.
Johnston DGW Williams MA Thaiss CA Cabrera-Rubio R Raverdeau M McEntee C. Loss of MicroRNA-21 influences the gut microbiota, causing reduced susceptibility in a murine model of colitis. J Crohns Colitis (2018 ) 12(7):835–48
Not in our library10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy038
- 24.
Dalmasso G Nguyen HTT Charrier-Hisamuddin L Yan Y Laroui H Demoulin B. PepT1 mediates transport of the proinflammatory bacterial tripeptide l-Ala-γ-d-Glu-Meso-DAP in intestinal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol.- Gastrointest. Liver Physiol (2010 ) 299(3):G687–96.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00527.2009
- 25.
Ayyadurai S Charania MA Xiao B Viennois E Merlin D. PepT1 expressed in immune cells has an important role in promoting the immune response during experimentally induced colitis. Lab Investig J Tech. Methods Pathol (2013 ) 93(8):888–99
Not in our library10.1038/labinvest.2013.77
- 26.
Rodríguez-Nogales A Algieri F Garrido-Mesa J Vezza T Utrilla MP Chueca N. Differential intestinal anti- inflammatory effects of lactobacillus fermentum and lactobacillus salivarius in DSS mouse colitis: Impact on MicroRNAs expression and microbiota composition. Mol Nutr Food Res (2017 ) 61(11)
Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.201700144
- 27.
Rodríguez-Nogales A Algieri F Garrido-Mesa J Vezza T Utrilla MP Chueca N. Differential intestinal anti- inflammatory effects of lactobacillus fermentum and lactobacillus salivarius in DSS mouse colitis: Impact on MicroRNAs expression and microbiota composition. Mol Nutr Food Res (2017 ) 61(11):1700144.
Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.201700144
- 28.
Nosho K Sukawa Y Adachi Y Ito M Mitsuhashi K Kurihara H. Association of fusobacterium nucleatum with immunity and molecular alterations in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol (2016 ) 22(2):557–66
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.557
- 29.
Dalmasso G Cougnoux A Delmas J Darfeuille-Michaud A Bonnet R. The bacterial genotoxin colibactin promotes colon tumor growth by modifying the tumor microenvironment. Gut Microbes (2014 ) 5(5):675–80
Not in our library10.4161/19490976.2014.969989
- 30.
Kumar M Sahu SK Kumar R Subuddhi A Maji RK Jana K. MicroRNA let-7 modulates the immune response to mycobacterium tuberculosis infection via control of A20, an inhibitor of the NF-κB pathway. Cell Host Microbe (2015 ) 17(3):345–56
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.007
- 31.
Naghavian R Ghaedi K Kiani-Esfahani A Ganjalikhani-Hakemi M Etemadifar M Nasr-Esfahani MH. MiR-141 and MiR-200a, revelation of new possible players in modulation of Th17/Treg differentiation and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. PloS One (2015 ) 10(5):e0124555
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0124555
- 32.
Seddiki N Brezar V Ruffin N Lévy Y Swaminathan S. Role of MiR-155 in the regulation of lymphocyte immune function and disease. Immunology (2014 ) 142(1):32–8
Not in our library10.1111/imm.12227
- 33.
Zhou H Li J Gao P Wang Q Zhang J. MiR-155: A novel target in allergic asthma. Int J Mol Sci (2016 ) 17(10)
Not in our library10.3390/ijms17101773
- 34.
Honardoost MA Naghavian R Ahmadinejad F Hosseini A Ghaedi K. Integrative computational MRNA–MiRNA interaction analyses of the autoimmune-deregulated MiRNAs and well-known Th17 differentiation regulators: An attempt to discover new potential MiRNAs involved in Th17 differentiation. Gene (2015 ) 572(2):153–62
Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2015.08.043
- 35.
Stanisavljević S Lukić J Momčilović M Miljković M Jevtić B Kojić M. Gut-associated lymphoid tissue, gut microbes and susceptibility to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Benef. Microbes (2016 ) 7(3):363–73
Not in our library10.3920/bm2015.0159
- 36.
- 37.
- 38.
Sokol H Pigneur B Watterlot L Lakhdari O Bermúdez-Humarán LG Gratadoux J.-. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of crohn disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2008 ) 105(43):16731–6
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0804812105
- 39.
Xu J Bjursell MK Himrod J Deng S Carmichael LK Chiang HC. Genomic view of the human-bacteroides thetaiotaomicron symbiosis. Science (2003 ) 299(5615):2074–6
Not in our library10.1126/science.1080029
- 40.
Clarke TB Davis KM Lysenko ES Zhou AY Yu Y Weiser JN. Recognition of peptidoglycan from the microbiota by Nod1 enhances systemic innate immunity. Nat Med (2010 ) 16(2):228–31
Not in our library10.1038/nm.2087
Cited by papers we hold 3
- Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis: Pathogenesis, Diseases, Prevention, and Therapy · 2025No notice
- Intestinal barrier permeability: the influence of gut microbiota, nutrition, and exercise · 2024No notice
- Role of the gut microbiota in anticancer therapy: from molecular mechanisms to clinical applications · 2023No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.