Skip to content
naulon

Corrected on Jan 27, 2025.

Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Oct 21, 2026 · Read the notice

Role of Lactate in Inflammatory Processes: Friend or Foe

Carolina Manosalva, John Quiroga, Alejandra I. Hidalgo and 4 more

Frontiers in Immunology · 2022 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.808799

Abstract

During an inflammatory process, shift in the cellular metabolism associated with an increase in extracellular acidification are well-known features. This pH drop in the inflamed tissue is largely attributed to the presence of lactate by an increase in glycolysis. In recent years, evidence has accumulated describing the role of lactate in inflammatory processes; however, there are differences as to whether lactate can currently be considered a pro- or anti-inflammatory mediator. Herein, we review these recent advances on the pleiotropic effects of lactate on the inflammatory process. Taken together, the evidence suggests that lactate could exert differential effects depending on the metabolic status, cell type in which the effects of lactate are studied, and the pathological process analyzed. Additionally, various targets, including post-translational modifications, G-protein coupled receptor and transcription factor activation such as NF-κB and HIF-1, allow lactate to modulate signaling pathways that control the expression of cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and several enzymes associated with immune response and metabolism. Altogether, this would explain its varied effects on inflammatory processes beyond its well-known role as a waste product of metabolism.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Lactate is a hydroxycarboxylic acid that is present as two stereoisomers in mammals, the left-handed (L-lactate) and the right-handed (D-lactate) forms, with L-lactate being the predominant form produced during anaerobic glycolysis. Several lines of evidence suggest that activation of inflammatory immune cells induces a shift from oxidative phosphorylation towards aerobic glycolysis with an increase in lactate, like the Warburg effect observed in tumor cells. The increase in L-lactate production is a metabolic response observed in activated neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells using Toll-like receptors (TLR) ligands or pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, the presence of lactate has been proposed as a biomarker in various diseases, including neoplasia malignancy, sepsis, and autoimmune diseases.

Conversely, D-lactate is formed through the methylglyoxal pathway in nanomolar concentrations but increase under pathophysiological conditions in humans, such as short-bowel syndrome, fatigue syndrome, diabetes mellitus, propylene glycol intoxication and in patients harboring deleterious enzymatic variants producing poor metabolizers of D-lactate. In cattle, several pathologies are associated with an increase in D-lactate during acute ruminal acidosis (ARA). ARA is produced by an imbalance of ruminal bacteria after consuming excessive, highly fermentable carbohydrates. This ingestion of carbohydrates is followed by the proliferation of lactate-producing microorganisms, such as Streptococcus bovis, which metabolizes carbohydrates to L (+) and D lactate. Bovines with ARA develop several lesions, including ruminitis, polioencephalomalacia (calves), liver abscess, and lameness. The evidence suggest that lactate would be involved in the pathophysiology of lameness in cattle. In fact, D-lactic acidosis has been closely associated with the appearance of laminitis and polysynovitis.

Lactate is often considered a metabolic waste of glycolysis; however, several studies suggest that lactate, is more than an intermediate metabolite, exerting immunomodulatory pleiotropic effects that regulate the inflammatory response. The aim of the review is to provide evidence on the various roles of lactate in inflammatory processes, which would depend on the metabolic status, the cellular phenotype, as well as the presence of a myriad of receptors that could modulate its effects.

Sources and Metabolism

During glycolysis, glucose is metabolized into two pyruvate molecules with the associated production of two ATP and two NADH molecules. Under the presence of oxygen, pyruvate is converted to acetyl-CoA by pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, producing approximately 25 ATP molecules per molecule of glucose. Under oxygen-deprived conditions, by the fermentative branch of the glycolytic pathway, NADH is used to reduce pyruvate to lactate through cytosolic lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a process that results in two ATP molecules and two lactate molecules without consuming oxygen. However, this last conversion of pyruvate to lactate also occurs under aerobic conditions and not only under conditions of lack of oxygen, which is known as the ‘Warburg effect’.

Pro-inflammatory signals induce cellular metabolic changes, characterized by increased glycolysis in the presence of oxygen, in a similar fashion to Warburg effect. In this way, the pyruvate formed during this process is reduced by LDH-A to lactate at the expense of a disruption of the TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) ( Figure 1 ). Overall, metabolic reprogramming is essential for both the inflammatory and anti-inflammatory response in immune cells, with aerobic glycolysis being predominant in inflammatory processes, while OXPHOS is more related to the anti-inflammatory response.

LDH is a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) dependent enzyme that mediates the bidirectional conversion of pyruvate and lactate concomitantly with the oxidation and reduction of the cofactor NAD+. LDH is a tetramer made up of two subunits, LDH-A and LDH-B, LDH-A having higher affinity and Vmax for pyruvate than LDH-B. Thus, LDH-A, and particularly the LDH-5 tetramer (consisting of 4 subunits of LDH-A), catabolizes pyruvate to lactate. In contrast, LDH-B transform lactate into pyruvate, allowing cells to use lactate as a source of nutrients for oxidative metabolism. Both L- and D-stereoisomers of lactate are produced and metabolized to pyruvate through the enzyme LDH. However, LDH has stereoselectivity, so D-lactate production and metabolism require D-LDH, and L-lactate requires L-LDH. The physiological serum concentration of lactate is 1 to 2 mM, with L-lactate being the predominant physiological enantiomer. Plasma ratio of D-lactate versus L-lactate is estimated to be 1: 100 under normal conditions. L-LDH catalyzes a bidirectional reaction between L-lactate and pyruvate, however, human D-LDH catalyzes the one-way conversion from D-lactate to pyruvate. L-lactate is produced by L-LDH-mediated oxidation of pyruvate obtained from glucose (65%) and alanine (16–20%) metabolism. To a lesser extent, pyruvate can also be produced during serine, threonine, and cysteine catabolism ( Figure 1 ). In contrast, D-LDH does not catalyze the conversion of pyruvate to D-lactate and other sources give rise to this enantiomer. L-lactate is rapidly metabolized to pyruvate in the cytosol and within the mitochondria by L-LDH, while the metabolism of D-lactate takes place only in the inner side of the mitochondria by D-LDH giving reduction equivalents to complex III of the respiratory chain.

An increase of LDH-A expression is key in the metabolism of cancer cells and is considered a negative prognostic biomarker. LDH-A is upregulated in CD8+ T cells and fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) from rheumatoid arthritis patient and is considered a potential target to rewire the metabolism and reduces inflammatory response. Recently, D-LDH has been linked to pathological conditions. Differential tissue expression of D-LDH could be involved in some neuropathological conditions. D-lactic acidosis in calves produces several neurological signs, such as changes in behavior and posture, progressing to coma and recumbency correlated with serum D-lactate concentrations, however, it is unknown whether this increase in D-lactate is related to defective D-LDH. D-lactate encephalopathy is a rare reversible neurologic syndrome that occurs in individuals with short bowel syndrome. D-lactate inhibits mitochondrial respiration in the brain, possibly due to low D-LDH activity, which interferes with the use of pyruvate and L-lactate as substrates of mitochondrial respiration. D-lactate also can exert as an astrocytic metabolic inhibitor and contribute with the D-lactate encephalopathy. Also, in patients harboring a mutations in D-LDH that results in increased blood levels of D-lactate, it has been associated with mild cerebellar ataxia, hypotonia, cognitive impairment, hyperuricemia and gout.

D-lactate is derived from carbohydrate metabolism and lipids through the formation of methylglyoxal (MG) ( Figure 2 ). MG is a by-product of glycolysis, produced by the fragmentation of dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (G3P). G3P is metabolized by triosephosphate isomerase to DHAP, whereas methylglyoxal synthase (MS) catalyzes the conversion of DHAP to MG. Furthermore, MG can be derived from protein metabolism, through aminoacetone formation, and from lipids, through reactions catalyzed in the kidney and liver by glycerol kinase and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase connecting glycolysis with lipid metabolism.

The production of MG from the oxidation of fatty acids occurs by conversion of acetone to MG in two steps catalyzed by acetone and acetyl monooxygenase (AMO). MG can also be produced by semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO)-catalyzed aminoacetone deamination from the catabolism of L-threonine and glycine. Glycerol has been shown to be a source of D-lactate derived from MG metabolism more efficient than glucose. This suggests that lipolysis could be a significant additional source of MG in the cell. Also, MG can be derived from lipid peroxidation or body ketone oxidation under pathological conditions such as diabetic ketoacidosis, prolonged fasting, or a low-carbohydrate diet. In the process of detoxification of MG, D-lactate is produced. MG is detoxified by glyoxalase-1 (Glo-1) and glyoxalase-2 (Glo-2). The first step consists of the spontaneous reaction between MG and reduced glutathione (GSH) to form a hemithioacetal, which is the substrate for Glo-1 to form S-lactoylglutathione. Glo-2 then transform S-lactoylglutathione to D-lactate, restoring GSH during this process. For GSH recycling, participation of the pentose phosphate pathway is important for the formation of NADPH to reduce oxidized glutathione (GSSG) through the action of glutathione reductase (GR). In dairy cows with ketoacidosis, MG participates in the inflammatory response associated with this metabolic disturbance. Despite this, the presence of D-lactate in cattle with ketoacidosis has not yet been reported, and the effect of MG can not be related to the formation of D-lactate.

Another source of lactate L and D in mammals is its production by intestinal bacteria. In humans, strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) exert health-promoting functions such as immunomodulatory improvement of intestinal integrity, resistance to pathogens, prevention of lactose intolerance, anticancer effects, reduction of depression and anxiety symptoms, anti-obesity and anti-diabetic activities, and decrease serum cholesterol levels. L-lactate in drinking water can suppress colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium in mice, promoting epithelial cell migration and repair through the augment of mitochondrial ATP production. On the other hand, microbiota-derived lactate, DL-lactate, regulates gut epithelium development, whereas LAB lacking LDH fails to induce intestinal stem-cell regeneration. Conversely, an increase in the abundance of some LAB strain, including Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, and Lactococcus has been observed in gastric cancer patients. This could involve the supply of exogenous lactate, which is an energy source for cancer cells that favor inflammation, angiogenesis, metastasis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and immune evasion. LABs are inducers of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in cultured cells and in vivo, inducing DNA damage in colon cells, which contrasts with LAB effects on the gastrointestinal tract. These ambivalent effects could be attributable to the LAB strain, rather than to the effects of lactate itself.

In cattle, L-lactate and D-lactate are produced in the rumen by Streptococcus bovis and lactobacillus bacteria and are degraded by lactate-utilizing bacteria in the rumen, such as Megasphaera elsdenii and Selenomonas ruminantium, with the ruminal pH level being key in the control of the net balance of either stereoisomer.

Lactate Transport

Lactate can cross the cell membrane by three known pathways: 1) free diffusion of undissociated acid, 2) exchange for another anion, and 3) transport via a stereospecific pH-sensitive transport protein (monocarboxylate transporter). For monocarboxylate transporters, members of the 16A solute carrier family proton-bound monocarboxylic acid symporters, i.e., MCT1 (SLC16A1), MCT2 (SLC16A7), MCT3 (SLC16A8), and MCT4 (SLC16A3) and two sodium-coupled lactate cotransporters (SLC5A12, SLC5A8) have been described.

In humans, MCTs have been reported in retina, muscle, kidney, brain capillary endothelial cells, cardiac myocytes, enterocytes, hepatocytes, erythrocytes, thymocytes, placenta, and nervous tissue. In cattle, some MCT isoforms have been described in the rumen epithelium, neutrophils, and fibroblast-like synoviocytes (bFLS). In mammals, MCT1 is ubiquitous and take part in lactate uptake in neutrophils and in various organs such as the heart, skeletal muscle, and red blood cells, as well as in the liver for gluconeogenesis. MCT2 is less ubiquitous and plays an important role in neurons, and MCT3 has been identified only in the retinal pigment epithelium and the choroid plexus epithelium. Conversely, MCT4 is expressed in strongly glycolytic cells, such as muscle fibers, and has been shown to increase its expression in response to hypoxia. In human immune cells, MCT1, MCT2, and MCT4, in granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes have been detected. Similarly, in bovine neutrophils, both MCT1 and MCT4 mRNA and proteins are expressed; however, MCT2 and MCT3 are absent. MCT4 expression levels in the bovine neutrophil were 1,000 times lower than MCT1 levels. MCT1 and MCT4 are associated with the chaperone CD147, which organizes both the distribution and the location of both transporters in the membrane. In fact, the presence of the chaperone protein CD147 has also been detected in bovine neutrophils.

MCT1 plays an essential role in neuroinflammation since lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was shown to increase the expression of MCT1 and 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 in microglia obtained from the brain of C57BL/6 mouse. The knockdown of MCT1 suppressed the glycolysis rate and decreased the LPS-induced expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and STAT1 phosphorylation in BV2 microglial cells. MCT4 is up-regulated in FLS obtained from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and exports intracellular lactate into synovial fluid in the joint. TLR2 and TLR4 agonists up-regulate MCT4 in human and mouse macrophages. Increased expression of MCT4 is mediated by MYD88 in an NF-κB-dependent manner and is necessary for the sustained high glycolysis observed during macrophage activation.

The transport kinetics for both stereoisomers have been measured in frog oocytes expressing MCT1 and MCT4. The Km values for MCT1 determined for L-lactate and D-lactate were 4.4 and >60 mM and for MCT4 were 28 and 519 mM, respectively. Despite the different Km of both stereoisomers D-lactate has pro-inflammatory effects dependent on MCT1 in both neutrophils and bFLS, which suggests that the uptake of D-lactate by MCT1 is a requirement for the pro-inflammatory effects of this stereoisomer. Accordingly, bovine with acute ruminal acidosis (ARA) 5 mM of D-lactate versus 1.6 mM of L-lactate in the bloodstream has been determined. It has been suggested that D-lactate is rapidly absorbed but metabolized more slowly than L-lactate by bovine tissues. Therefore, only D-lactate blood concentrations are increased in cattle with ARA, which could contribute to the development of inflammatory processes in ruminants.

Lactate as a Cellular Metabolite Immunomodulator

To carry out the inflammatory response, immune cells must activate metabolic pathways as part of host defense responses. Conversely, each population of immune cells requires different metabolism and nutrient use. It has been shown that macrophage metabolism can influence inflammatory cytokine production, and the same has been demonstrated in T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and dendritic cells (DC). The intersection between metabolism and immunity has been proposed to be part of the field of immunometabolism. Most research has focused on the absorption and metabolism of glucose, amino acids, mainly glutamine, and certain fatty acids. However, lactate, the end product of the glycolytic pathway, may regulate the inflammatory response in various cells. Lactate is produced and secreted in significant quantities by immune cells during the inflammatory process. Although short-term lactate exposure has limited effects on cytokine production, long-term lactate treatment shows strong anti-inflammatory effects in monocytes. This adaptation of immune cells to lactate concentrations in the microenvironment, may affect the functions of tissue-specific immune cells. Moreover, it suggests that the duration of lactate exposure can also decide the outcome of immunomodulatory effects.

It has recently been demonstrated in neutrophils that lactate can be used as non-glucose substrates to generate glycogen stores. In addition, in neutrophils, LPS increases the gluconeogenesis that fuels glycogen deposition, which in turn support the higher energy demands of a pro-inflammatory response. In FLS, a relevant effector of synovial immunity, an increase in lactate production is associated with the characteristic glycolytic metabolic rewiring in rheumatoid arthritis; moreover, lactate can induce metabolic reprograming in FLS and increase pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. Altogether, these results suggest that the effect of lactate on inflammation is closely related to the cellular phenotype and its metabolic status.

Lactate Activity in Endothelial Cells

Endothelial cells (ECs) control the extravasation of circulating immune cells into tissues through the production of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. It has been proposed that lactate can activate signaling pathways in endothelial cells and modulate the inflammatory response.

In ECs, lactate influx via MCT1 induces the activation of NF-κB. NF-κB is constituted by p65 (RelA) and p50 (NF-κB1) subunits and remains inactive in the cytosol forming a complex with IκB proteins. Phosphorylation of IκB is crucial for the polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of IκB and activation of NF-κB. Lactate through phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα activates NF-κB and regulates a wide variety of inflammatory genes including IL-8. The activation of NF-κB by lactate is dependent on the inhibition of prolyl hydroxylase (PHD), which are Fe (II) and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. The oxidation of lactate by LDH-B increases the intracellular pool of pyruvate that competes with 2-oxoglutarate and inhibits the hydroxylase activity of PHD. PDH-catalyzed hydroxylation of proline induces polyubiquitylation and degradation of HIF-1α in the proteasome. Inhibition of PDH by pyruvate results in protein stabilization of HIF-1α allowing migration to the nucleus to modulate transcription of target genes in ECs. These genes include proangiogenic effectors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Overall, in ECs lactate activates both NF-κB and HIF-1α and the decrease in the catalytic activity of PHD is required for the activation of both transcription factors by lactate ( Figure 3 ). However, lactate-induced NF-κB activity was also inhibited by antioxidant agents, suggesting the participation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the regulation of the lactate-induced inflammatory response in ECs. On the other hand, endothelial cells express the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), GPR4, a proton-sensing receptor. Extracellular acidification by lactic acid can promotes the pro-inflammatory response in ECs, the cellular mechanisms associated with this receptor are discussed in section 4.

Lactate Activity in Neutrophils

Neutrophils are one the first leukocytes to be recruited to the site of infection and to execute microbial killing perform diverse functions such as phagocytosis, oxidative burst (ROS) and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). However, also neutrophil responses lead to tissue injury and are associated with several diseases such as sepsis, asthma, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and rheumatoid arthritis. Due to the low abundance of mitochondria, it has been commonly considered that neutrophils only use glycolysis for their biological functions. However, different metabolic routes are required to fulfill the energetic, biosynthetic, and functional requirements of neutrophils, including the TCA cycle, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and fatty acid oxidation (FAO). Nonetheless, glycolysis is the main metabolic pathway involved in phagocytosis, ROS, and NET release. Inducers of ROS-dependent and ROS-independent NETs cause an increase in extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), LDH activity, and a reduction in pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) activity, increasing lactate formation. The deamination of histones (mainly conversion of arginine side chains to citrullines) is a key step to allow whole NET dispersion. In fact, mice lacking peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4), the enzyme required for histone deamination, have decreased NETosis. Furthermore, D-lactate induces the release of NET in bovine neutrophils, activating PAD4 and by a mechanism independent of ROS ( Figure 3 ).

Inhibition of lactate formation by sodium oxamate, an LDH inhibitor, reduces tachyzoite-induced NETs. Furthermore, sodium oxamate, inhibits NETosis and lactate accumulation during LPS-induced sepsis in mice, suggesting the importance of lactate as a pro-inflammatory agent in an experimental model of NETosis. In fact, both L- and D-lactate can directly induce the release of NETs. D-lactate-induced NETosis is dependent on MCT1, and this effect favors the adhesion of PMN to the endothelium, suggesting that lactate could behave as an intracellular signaling agent.

D-lactate has been shown to have a pro-inflammatory effect on bovine neutrophils since it induces the release of MMP-9, increases the expression of CD11b and decreases the expression of L-selectin, which favors endothelial adhesion. Conversely, exogenous lactate treatment also induces NET formation in human neutrophils, while inhibition of LDH activity significantly reduces NETosis.

Lactate Activity in Macrophages and Mast Cells

LPS induces differentiation to M1-type macrophages, a proinflammatory phenotype that generates ATP and lactate release through aerobic glycolysis. Furthermore, inhibition of LDH-A by FX11 reduces lactate secretion, pro-inflammatory cytokine release, iNOS levels, and COX2 expression in RAW264.7 macrophages treated with LPS. Additionally, MCT1 is expressed in macrophages and increases with inflammatory stimuli such as LPS, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, or nitric oxide (NO), increasing lactate uptake.

Macrophages exposed to 20 mM lactate for 24 h, followed by LPS plus lactate for another 24 h, increases pro-inflammatory cytokine production through MD-2 up-regulation, a TLR4 co-receptor being this response MCT dependent. The inhibition of MCTs by alpha cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid decreases the expression of lactate-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines in human macrophages, indicating that lactate transport through MCT is necessary for lactate effects on macrophages. Taken together, the current background suggests that lactate may be a metabolite involved in the regulation of the pro-inflammatory response in macrophages. Sodium lactate increases the LPS-induced expression of MMP-1, IL-1β, and IL-6 in U937 macrophage-like cells through NF-κB and Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) cascades. Other author suggest that lactic acid reduces the activity of NF-κB and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines presenting anti-inflammatory effects in LPS-stimulated macrophages through of GPR81. Moreover, an increase of protons could also explain the discrepancy of lactate effect on macrophages. Has been demonstrated that the neutralization of pH in the lactic acid-containing medium increases LPS-induced MMP-1 secretion, indicating that lactic acid-induced pH reduction may interfere with pro-inflammatory effects. Besides, secretion of TNF-α by macrophages is inhibited by acidic pH. Additionally, long term effect of exogenous lactate in M1 macrophages, trigger an endogenous ‘lactate clock’ that induce an M2 phenotype by metabolic reprograming through the epigenetic mechanism by lactylation and acetylation of histone H3. This effect could to assist with repairing collateral damage produced by the host during infection and to explain the anti-inflammatory effects of lactate after 24 h. Also, lactate through ERK-STAT3 signaling pathway and the combination of lactate and hypoxia via HIF1α stabilization shift the polarization into M2-like macrophages.

Similarly, lactate decreases the expression of cytokines induced by LPS and IL-33 in mouse mast cells. The anti-inflammatory effects presented by lactate in mast cells are through a decrease in the phosphorylation of TGF-β-activated kinase-1, JNK and ERK which suppresses the activation of NF-κB. Furthermore, the effects of lactate have been related to HIF-1α, which regulates microRNA miR-155, considered a pro-inflammatory agent in various systems. Other mechanisms have also been proposed, such as the reduction of the IgE-induced phosphorylation of Syk, Btk and ERK, which are signals of inflammatory responses, which confirms the anti-inflammatory role of lactate in mast cells.

Lactate Activity in Lymphocytes

Several studies have shown that activated T lymphocytes increase intracellular lactate concentrations coupled with increased expression of glucose and lactate transporters, glucose uptake, expression of glycolytic enzymes, and LDH. The foregoing has led to the conclusion that the energy required by active T cells leads to a metabolic shift toward aerobic glycolysis and an increase in lactate. Increased intracellular lactate production correlates with increased extracellular lactate, which can inhibit glucose consumption by reversing lactate flux and, in this way, interfere with T-cell function. Overall, the extracellular lactate uptake, through MCT, down-regulates hexokinase 1 (Hk1) which reduces glycolysis and reduces T cell migration. Another lactate-induced effect on T cells is increased production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-17. Both decreased migration and increased production of IL-17 induced by lactate in T cells is the hallmark of T cell – mediated inflammation in chronic inflammatory diseases (CID). Consistent with the above, chronically inflamed synovial tissue from RA patients is associated with high levels of IL-17, CD4+ T cells and high expression of MCT (Slc5a12). Hence, lactate is uptake in T cells trough MCT and inhibits glycolysis but increases IL-17 expression through the PKM2/STAT3 pathway. Thus, lactate causes T-cell entrapment and increased expression of cytokines at inflamed sites ( Figure 3 ).

Lactate in Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes

Lactate has an important role in inflammatory joint pathologies such as rheumatoid arthritis. Intracellular levels of L-lactate contribute to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in FLS through intracellular signaling that involve the MAPK and NF-κB pathways. Additionally, it has been proposed that TNF-α-induced IL-6 and IL-8 production in FLS from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (FLS-RA) is dependent on L-lactate levels. FLS-RA in a later stage has elevated MCT4 levels. The expulsion of lactate by MCT4 protects the cells from the damaging effects of its accumulation. However, it is unknown whether lactate can be taken up and used by other cells. It is highly likely that the role of MCT and metabolite exchange between cells differs during the course of RA depends on the mitochondrial state and the micro-environment of the joint.

D-lactate is involved in the etiology of lameness during ARA. In fact, a significant increase in D-lactate has been observed in the synovial fluid of bovines with ARA, and it has been hypothesized that D-lactate may exert a pro-inflammatory effect on bFLS. In relation to this, an increase in IL-1β, IL-6, and PGE2 has been identified in the synovial fluid of heifers with ARA. In vitro studies have shown that D-lactate increases IL-6 and IL-8 in bFLS. Consistent with this, D-lactate and IL-6 increase early in the synovial fluid of heifers with ARA and this increase occurs before the recruitment of joint neutrophils. Similarly, a very early metabolic change with the presence of lactate in arthritic joints precedes the recruitment of phagocytic immune cells.

The presence of MCT1 and MCT4 mRNA and proteins has been detected in bFLS. Blocking MCT1 by a selective inhibitor reduces the expression and synthesis of IL-8 and IL-6. These results suggest that lactate plays an important role in inflammatory processes and that entry into cells through MCT could contribute at least in part to exert these effects ( Figure 3 ).

MAPK and NF-κB pathways have been extensively studied and are critical in FLS activation during joint inflammation. D-lactate increases ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation in bFLS, and it has been suggested that L-lactate could also activate p38 and ERK1/2 in FLS-RA. Inhibition of these kinases decreased IL-6 and IL-8 induced by D-lactate, suggesting that D-lactate could regulate the expression and synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines through the MAPK pathway and the NF-κB pathway, which are involved in the synthesis of IL-6, CXCL8 and the expression of COX-2 and mPGES-1 ( Figure 3 ). D-lactate and bovine TNF-α (bTNF-α) increase the expression and secretion of IL-8 and IL-6 in an NF-κB-dependent manner in bFLS. Besides, L-lactate increases the degradation of IκBα and activates NF-κB in human FLS. Activation of NF-κB is key for the constitutive secretion of IL-6 and IL-8, as well as the secretion of these cytokines induced by IL-1β in FLS-RA, which suggests that lactate in the joint could activate intracellular signaling in FLS leading to the expression of pro-inflammatory markers during joint inflammation.

Overall, the pleiotropic effects of lactate in inflammatory processes could be partially linked by its property as a multifunctional intracellular signaling molecule, which control the transcription factors activity and pro-inflammatory protein expression. Additionally, these effects could be dependent of changes in MCTs expression and lactate metabolism during inflammatory process. In fact, immune cells also show quite dissimilar cellular metabolism, closely related to their role in inflammatory processes, in this scenario lactate differentially affects cell metabolism, and depending on the cell type and metabolic microenvironment, it would exert inflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects. In the past years, the discovery of several G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) as potential lactate and proton sensors, could additionally explain the varied responses seen with lactate in inflammation.

Lactate as a G Protein-Coupled Receptor Agonist

Hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2 (HCA2) is a GPCR also known as PUMA-G (upregulated protein in macrophages by IFN-γ), HM74A, and GPR109A. White and brown adipose tissue, macrophages, neutrophils, Langerhans epidermal cells, DCs, and microglia express HCA2. Proinflammatory stimuli such as LPS, IL-6, and IL-1β increase the expression of HCA2 in macrophages, and colony-stimulating factor 2 (CSF2) augment the level of HCA2 expression in neutrophils. In macrophages, HCA2 couples to Gαi/o-type G proteins that, via protein kinase A (PKA) or Gβγ, can inhibit NF-κB and reduces cytokine expression, whereas in neutrophils HCA2 via Gαi/o reduces cAMP favoring apoptosis through the pro-apoptotic protein BAD. In sepsis, lactate-induced activation of HCA2 decreases the inflammatory response by reducing cytokine expression and promoting M2-like polarization ( Table 1 ).

Lactate signaling can be modulated by the G-protein coupled receptor GPR81 (also named HCA1) localized in the cytoplasmic membrane. GPR81 is coupled to Gαi-type G proteins. After lactate stimulation, the distribution of GPR81 is observed in intracellular granules, suggesting internalization. GPR81 activation occurs at a lactate concentration of 0.2 to 1.0 mM, followed by down-regulation of cAMP and inhibition of PKA-mediated signaling. Lactate binds to GPR81 in adipocytes inhibiting the lipolysis. Evidence suggests that GPR81 is an anti-inflammatory pathway that inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome release by activating the intracellular adaptor protein, β-arrestin 2 (ARRB2), and attenuating NF-κB activity ( Figure 3 ). In macrophages and monocytes, lactate binds to GPR81 and reduces the effects induced by TLR4 agonists such as NF-κB activation, the release of IL-1β, and cleavage of CASP1, via ARRB2 ( Table 1 ). Lactate through GPR81 reduces inflammation and organ injury in mice with auto-immune hepatitis. In GPR81-/- mice, susceptibility to dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colonic inflammation is increased, while pharmacological activation of GPR81 decreases the expression of inflammatory cytokines and improves colonic inflammation. GPR81 has also been involved in the anti-inflammatory activity of lactate in mouse uterine inflammation during labor. It has recently been demonstrated in macrophages that lactate via GPR81/ARRB2 increases acetylation of HMGB1 by inducing nuclear translocation of acetylase p300/CBP resulting in increased endothelium permeability.

LPS activates bone marrow (BM) neutrophils and induces lactate release through increased glycolysis. Lactate released acts on GPR81 expressed by endothelial cells to increase vascular permeability inducing the mobilization of BM neutrophils. Lactate increases the levels of neutrophil-attracting chemokines favoring rapid neutrophil mobilization from the BM. LPS decrease the expression of GPR81 and MCT-1 in endothelial cells and increase lactate concentrations in the extracellular space, suggesting a role in neuroinflammatory processes altering structural integrity of the blood-brain barrier in vitro. Additional evidence suggests that the activation of GPR81 reduces oxidative stress and the expression of IL-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and HMGB1. Accordingly, it has been shown that the activation of GPR81 can exert atheroprotective effects in endothelial cells exposed to oscillatory shear stress (OSS).

The activation of GPR81 inhibits the secretion of the vascular cellular adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 and endothelial selectin (E-selectin), which suppress monocyte attachment to the endothelium. Conversely, lactate induces the expression of the neutrophil chemokines CXCL1, CXCL2, and G-CSF in bone marrow and plasma through a mechanism independent of the GPR81 receptor. This suggests a potential pleiotropic pro-inflammatory effect in of lactate; however, it remains to be clarified whether lactate produces its effects by direct activation of the receptor or through lactic acidosis, which could produce conformational modifications in the receptor.

Acidosis is a hallmark of the microenvironment of inflammatory pathologies, where lactic acid is among the most important extracellular metabolites. Thus, other putative lactate sensors GPR4, GPR65 (TDAG8), GPR68 (also known as ovarian cancer G protein-coupled receptor 1, OGR1), and GPR132 (G2A) have been described as proton sensitive and could be involved in immune modulation during the inflammatory processes characterized by low pH levels obtained from lactic and carbonic acids.

GPR132 is described in neutrophils and macrophages and appears to be responsible for migration to recruit macrophages in the pro-inflammatory microenvironment surrounding the focus of inflammation. In addition to being the least sensitive to extracellular acidification, it can be stimulated by lysophospholipids, generating IP3 through Gαq activation. GPR132 expression is reduced by the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs); moreover, breast tumor cells produce lactate which activates GPR132 in TAMs, promoting macrophage M2 activation and tumor growth.

GPR4 is a pro-inflammatory GPCR that activates the Gs-cAMP-exchange protein activated by cAMP highly expressed in vascular endothelial cells linked to leukocyte adhesion. Activation of GPR4 by extracellular acidification also increase the expression of chemokines, cytokines, and adhesion molecules through the NF-κB pathway in endothelial cells ( Table 1 ). Acidosis-induced activation of GPR4 promotes the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response and apoptosis of endothelial cells. GPR4-/- reduces inflammation in the DSS-induced acute colitis and in the spontaneous IL-10-/- colitis model in rodents.

GPR65 (TDAG8) is expressed in T cells, B cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils and is coupled to the Gs/adenyl cyclase/cAMP pathway. GPR65 activation reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production (TNF-α and IL-6) in mouse peritoneal macrophages, ROS production in human neutrophils and apoptosis in human eosinophils ( Table 1 ).

GPR68 (OGR1) is a proton-sensing receptor that can detect decreases in extracellular pH during inflammation. It is expressed in macrophages, dendritic cells, T cells, and neutrophils and has a pro-inflammatory function in colitis, asthma through activation of dendritic cells, and in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis that regulates T cell responses during autoimmunity. This receptor has been described to be able to couple Gαq/11 and Gαs and trigger increased intracellular calcium and cAMP ( Table 1 ). GPR68 may maintain TAM in an M2-like phenotype and inhibits T-cell infiltration, which promotes tumor growth. GPR68 expression can be induced by TNF-α in the human macrophage lineage and primary human monocytes, activating Gαq signaling during the development of mucosal inflammation. Furthermore, hypoxia improves the TNF-mediated induction of OGR1 expression, which is reversed by NF-κB inhibitors. Extracellular acidification induces the production of CXCL8 and IL-6 through OGR1 in human airway smooth muscle cells and could be related to bronchial contraction and hyperresponsiveness of the airways in patients with bronchial asthma.

Conclusions

Lactate, more than a product of metabolism, exerts modulating effects on the immune response and, depending on the cell type, could interfere or promote the inflammatory response. Apparently, the diversity of effects would depend on the pathway by which lactate is generated or metabolized. In addition, during the development of inflammatory processes, various changes occur in cell metabolism, in this scenario the presence of lactate can contribute to enhance or interfere with the immune response, depending on the pathological context analyzed. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that lactate may play as pleiotropic physiological signaling agent, modulating several signal transduction pathways and transcription factors. Lactate can mediate its effects directly through lactate-sensitive G-protein coupled receptors or indirectly through its effects on extracellular acidification, which would stimulate different proton-sensitive receptors. The activation of these receptors can contribute or interfere with the inflammatory process.

Taken together, all the currently available evidence suggest that lactate possesses a myriad of biological effects, which could explain dissimilar responses observed in inflammatory processes.

References 196

  1. 1.

    Connor H Woods HF Ledingham JGG. Comparison of the Kinetics and Utilisation of D(-)- and L(+)-Sodium Lactate in Normal Man. Ann Nutr Metab (1983 ) 27:481–7

    Not in our library10.1159/000176723

  2. 2.

    Talasniemi JP Pennanen S Savolainen H Niskanen L Liesivuori J. Analytical Investigation: Assay of D-Lactate in Diabetic Plasma and Urine. Clin Biochem (2008 ) 41:1099–103

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.06.011

  3. 3.

    Palsson-McDermott EM O’Neill LAJ. The Warburg Effect Then and Now: From Cancer to Inflammatory Diseases. BioEssays (2013 ) 35:965–73

    Not in our library10.1002/bies.201300084

  4. 4.

    Ippolito L Morandi A Giannoni E Chiarugi P. Lactate: A Metabolic Driver in the Tumour Landscape. Trends Biochem Sci (2019 ) 44:153–66

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2018.10.011

  5. 5.

    Jansen TC Van Bommel J Bakker J. Blood Lactate Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Health Technology Assessment. Crit Care Med (2009 ) 37:2827–39

    Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181a98899

  6. 6.

    Pucino V Bombardieri M Pitzalis C Mauro C. Lactate at the Crossroads of Metabolism, Inflammation, and Autoimmunity. Eur J Immunol (2017 ) 47:14–21

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.201646477

  7. 7.

    Ewaschuk JB Naylor JM Zello GA. D-Lactate in Human and Ruminant Metabolism. J Nutr (2005 ) 135:1619–25

    Not in our library10.1093/jn/135.7.1619

  8. 8.

    Oh MS Phelps KR Traube M Barbosa-Saldivar JL Boxhill C Carroll HJ. D-Lactic Acidosis in a Man With the Short-Bowel Syndrome. N Engl J Med (1979 ) 301:249–52

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm197908023010505

  9. 9.

    Zhang DL Jiang ZW Jiang J Cao B Li JS. D-Lactic Acidosis Secondary to Short Bowel Syndrome. Postgrad Med J (2003 ) 79:110–2

    Not in our library10.1136/pmj.79.928.110

  10. 10.

    Sheedy JR Wettenhall REH Scanlon D Gooley PR Lewis DP McGregor N. Increased D-Lactic Acid Intestinal Bacteria in Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. In Vivo (2009 ) 23:621–8

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0954-6820.1964.tb04669.x

  11. 11.

    Kondoh Y Kawase M Kawakami Y Ohmori S. Concentrations of D-Lactate and its Related Metabolic Intermediates in Liver, Blood, and Muscle of Diabetic and Starved Rats. Res Exp Med Z fur die gesamte Exp Med Einschl Exp Chir (1992 ) 192:407–14

    Not in our library10.1007/bf02576298

  12. 12.

    Jorens PG Demey HE Schepens PJC Coucke V Verpooten GA Couttenye MM. Unusual D-Lactic Acid Acidosis From Propylene Glycol Metabolism in Overdose. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol (2004 ) 42:163–9

    Not in our library10.1081/clt-120030942

  13. 13.

    Monroe GR van Eerde AM Tessadori F Duran KJ Savelberg SMC van Alfen JC. Identification of Human D Lactate Dehydrogenase Deficiency. Nat Commun (2019 ) 10:1477

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-019-09458-6

  14. 14.

    Hernández J Benedito JL Abuelo A Castillo C. Ruminal Acidosis in Feedlot: From Aetiology to Prevention. Sci World J (2014 ) 2014:1–8

    Not in our library10.1155/2014/702572

  15. 15.

    Thoefner MB Pollitt CC van Eps AW Milinovich GJ Trott DJ Wattle O. Acute Bovine Laminitis: A New Induction Model Using Alimentary Oligofructose Overload. J Dairy Sci (2004 ) 87:2932–40

    Not in our library10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73424-4

  16. 16.

    Danscher AM Enemark HL Andersen PH Aalbæk B Nielsen OL. Polysynovitis After Oligofructose Overload in Dairy Cattle. J Comp Pathol (2010 ) 142:129–38

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcpa.2009.09.001

  17. 17.

    Manosalva C Quiroga J Teuber S Cárdenas S Carretta MD Morán G. D-Lactate Increases Cytokine Production in Bovine Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes via MCT1 Uptake and the MAPK, PI3K/Akt, and NF-κ B Pathways. Animals (2020 ) 10:2105

    Not in our library10.3390/ani10112105

  18. 18.

    Hidalgo AI Carretta MD Alarcón P Manosalva C Müller A Navarro M. Pro-Inflammatory Mediators and Neutrophils are Increased in Synovial Fluid From Heifers With Acute Ruminal Acidosis. BMC Vet Res (2019 ) 15:225

    Not in our library10.1186/s12917-019-1974-x

  19. 19.

    Alarcon P Hidalgo AI Manosalva C Cristi R Teuber S Hidalgo MA. Metabolic Disturbances in Synovial Fluid are Involved in the Onset of Synovitis in Heifers With Acute Ruminal Acidosis. Sci Rep (2019 ) 9:5452

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-42007-1

  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    Brooks GA. Lactate as a Fulcrum of Metabolism. Redox Biol (2020 ) 35:101454

    Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2020.101454

  22. 22.

    Singer K Kastenberger M Gottfried E Hammerschmied CG Büttner M Aigner M. Warburg Phenotype in Renal Cell Carcinoma: High Expression of Glucose-Transporter 1 (GLUT-1) Correlates With Low CD8+ T-Cell Infiltration in the Tumor. Int J Cancer (2011 ) 128:2085–95

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.25543

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Kornberg MD. The Immunologic Warburg Effect: Evidence and Therapeutic Opportunities in Autoimmunity. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med (2020 ) 12:e1486

    Not in our library10.1002/wsbm.1486

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    Doherty JR Cleveland JL. Targeting Lactate Metabolism for Cancer Therapeutics. J Clin Invest (2013 ) 123:3685–92

    Not in our library10.1172/jci69741

  27. 27.

    Taguchi H Ohta T. D-Lactate Dehydrogenase is a Member of the D-Isomer-Specific 2-Hydroxyacid Dehydrogenase Family: Cloning, Sequencing, and Expression in Escherichia Coli of the D-Lactate Dehydrogenase Gene of Lactobacillus Plantarum. J Biol Chem (1991 ) 266:12588–94

    Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(18)98939-8

  28. 28.

    Kochhar S Hunziker PE Leong-Morgenthaler P Hottinger H. Evolutionary Relationship of NAD+-Dependent D-Lactate Dehydrogenase: Comparison of Primary Structure of 2-Hydroxy Acid Dehydrogenases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1992 ) 184:60–6

    Not in our library10.1016/0006-291x(92)91157-l

  29. 29.

    Levitt MD Levitt DG. Quantitative Evaluation of D-Lactate Pathophysiology: New Insights Into the Mechanisms Involved and the Many Areas in Need of Further Investigation. Clin Exp Gastroenterol (2020 ) 13:321–37

    Not in our library10.2147/ceg.s260600

  30. 30.

    Perriello G Jorde R Nurjhan N Stumvoll M Dailey G Jenssen T. Estimation of Glucose-Alanine-Lactate-Glutamine Cycles in Postabsorptive Humans: Role of Skeletal Muscle. Am J Physiol - Endocrinol Metab (1995 ) 269:443–50

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpendo.1995.269.3.e443

  31. 31.

    de Bari L Atlante A Guaragnella N Principato G Passarella S. D-Lactate Transport and Metabolism in Rat Liver Mitochondria. Biochem J (2002 ) 365:391–403

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20020139

  32. 32.

    Liu J Yang C Huang XM Lv PP Yang YK Zhao JN. Knockdown of FBI-1 Inhibits the Warburg Effect and Enhances the Sensitivity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells to Molecular Targeted Agents via miR-3692/HIF-1α. Front Oncol (2021 ) 11:796839

    Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2021.796839

  33. 33.

    Xiang J Zhou L Zhuang Y Zhang J Sun Y Li S. Lactate Dehydrogenase is Correlated With Clinical Stage and Grade and is Downregulated by Si-SATB1 in Ovarian Cancer. Oncol Rep (2018 ) 40:2788–97

    Not in our library10.3892/or.2018.6658

  34. 34.

    Souto-Carneiro MM Klika KD Abreu MT Meyer AP Saffrich R Sandhoff R. Effect of Increased Lactate Dehydrogenase A Activity and Aerobic Glycolysis on the Proinflammatory Profile of Autoimmune CD8+ T Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2020 ) 72:2050–64

    Not in our library10.1002/art.41420

  35. 35.

    Song YJ Kim A Kim GT Yu HY Lee ES Park MJ. Inhibition of Lactate Dehydrogenase A Suppresses Inflammatory Response in RAW 264.7 Macrophages. Mol Med Rep (2019 ) 19:629–37

    Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2018.9678

  36. 36.

    Kvacskay P Yao N Schnotz JH Scarpone R Carvalho R de A Klika KD. Increase of Aerobic Glycolysis Mediated by Activated T Helper Cells Drives Synovial Fibroblasts Towards an Inflammatory Phenotype: New Targets for Therapy? Arthritis Res Ther (2021 ) 23:56

    Not in our library10.1186/s13075-021-02437-7

  37. 37.

    Zhang M Lu N Guo XY Li HJ Guo Y Lu L. Influences of the lncRNA TUG1-miRNA-34a-5p Network on Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes (FLSs) Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Arthritis Through Targeting the Lactate Dehydrogenase A (LDHA). J Clin Lab Anal (2021 ) 35:e23969

    Not in our library10.1002/jcla.23969

  38. 38.

    Lorenz I. D-Lactic Acidosis in Calves. Vet J (2009 ) 179:197–203

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.08.028

  39. 39.

    Lorenz I. Investigations on the Influence of Serum D-Lactate Levels on Clinical Signs in Calves With Metabolic Acidosis. Vet J (2004 ) 168:323–7

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tvjl.2003.10.021

  40. 40.

    Dahlquist NR Perrault J Callaway CW Jones JD. D-Lactic Acidosis and Encephalopathy After Jejunoileostomy: Response to Overfeeding and to Fasting in Humans. Mayo Clin Proc (1984 ) 59:141–5

    Not in our library10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60764-2

  41. 41.

    Petersen C. D-Lactic Acidosis. Nutr Clin Pract (2005 ) 20:634–45

    Not in our library10.1177/0115426505020006634

  42. 42.

    Uribarri J Oh MS Carroll HJ. D-Lactic Acidosis: A Review of Clinical Presentation, Biochemical Features, and Pathophysiologic Mechanisms. Med (Baltimore) (1998 ) 77:73–82

    Not in our library10.1097/00005792-199803000-00001

  43. 43.

    Ling B Peng F Alcorn J Lohmann K Bandy B Zello GA. D-Lactate Altered Mitochondrial Energy Production in Rat Brain and Heart But Not Liver. Nutr Metab (2012 ) 9:6

    Not in our library10.1186/1743-7075-9-6

  44. 44.

    Gibbs ME Hertz L. Inhibition of Astrocytic Energy Metabolism by D-Lactate Exposure Impairs Memory. Neurochem Int (2008 ) 52:1012–8

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuint.2007.10.014

  45. 45.
  46. 46.

    Drabkin M Yogev Y Zeller L Zarivach R Zalk R Halperin D. Hyperuricemia and Gout Caused by Missense Mutation in D-Lactate Dehydrogenase. J Clin Invest (2019 ) 129:5163–8

    Not in our library10.1172/jci129057

  47. 47.

    de Bari L Atlante A Armeni T Kalapos MP. Synthesis and Metabolism of Methylglyoxal, S-D-Lactoylglutathione and D-Lactate in Cancer and Alzheimer’s Disease. Exploring the Crossroad of Eternal Youth and Premature Aging. Ageing Res Rev (2019 ) 53:100915

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2019.100915

  48. 48.
  49. 49.

    Desai KM Chang T Wang H Banigesh A Dhar A Liu J. Oxidative Stress and Aging: Is Methylglyoxal the Hidden Enemy? Can J Physiol Pharmacol (2010 ) 88:273–84

    Not in our library10.1139/y10-001

  50. 50.

    Kalapos MP. Where Does Plasma Methylglyoxal Originate From? Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2013 ) 99:260–71

    Not in our library10.1016/j.diabres.2012.11.003

  51. 51.

    Kondoh Y Kawase M Hirata M Ohmori S. Carbon Sources for D-Lactate Formation in Rat Liver. J Biochem (1994 ) 115:590–5

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124380

  52. 52.
  53. 53.
  54. 54.

    Li C Dai S Lu J Zhao B Wang J Li P. Methylglyoxal: A Newly Detected and Potentially Harmful Metabolite in the Blood of Ketotic Dairy Cows. J Dairy Sci (2018 ) 101:8513–23

    Not in our library10.3168/jds.2018-14448

  55. 55.

    de Melo Pereira GV de Oliveira Coelho B Magalhães Júnior AI Thomaz-Soccol V Soccol CR. How to Select a Probiotic? A Review and Update of Methods and Criteria. Biotechnol Adv (2018 ) 36:2060–76

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.09.003

  56. 56.

    Yu Y Yang W Bilotta AJ Zhao X Cong Y Li Y. L-Lactate Promotes Intestinal Epithelial Cell Migration to Inhibit Colitis. FASEB J (2021 ) 35:e21554

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.202100095r

  57. 57.

    Lee YS Kim TY Kim Y Lee SH Kim S Kang SW. Microbiota-Derived Lactate Accelerates Intestinal Stem-Cell-Mediated Epithelial Development. Cell Host Microbe (2018 ) 24:833–46

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2018.11.002

  58. 58.

    Vinasco K Mitchell HM Kaakoush NO Castaño-Rodríguez N. Microbial Carcinogenesis: Lactic Acid Bacteria in Gastric Cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta - Rev Cancer (2019 ) 1872:188309

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.07.004

  59. 59.

    Jones RM Mercante JW Neish AS. Reactive Oxygen Production Induced by the Gut Microbiota: Pharmacotherapeutic Implications. Curr Med Chem (2012 ) 19:1519–29

    Not in our library10.2174/092986712799828283

  60. 60.

    Koller VJ Marian B Stidl R Nersesyan A Winter H Simić T. Impact of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Oxidative DNA Damage in Human Derived Colon Cells. Food Chem Toxicol (2008 ) 46:1221–9

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.005

  61. 61.

    Nagaraja TG Titgemeyer EC. Ruminal Acidosis in Beef Cattle: The Current Microbiological and Nutritional Outlook. J Dairy Sci (2007 ) 90:E17–38

    Not in our library10.3168/jds.2006-478

  62. 62.

    Halestrap AP. The Monocarboxylate Transporter Family-Structure and Functional Characterization. IUBMB Life (2012 ) 64:1–9

    Not in our library10.1002/iub.573

  63. 63.

    Srinivas SR Gopal E Zhuang L Itagaki S Martin PM Fei YJ. Cloning and Functional Identification of Slc5a12 as a Sodium-Coupled Low-Affinity Transporter for Monocarboxylates (SMCT2). Biochem J (2005 ) 392:655–64

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20050927

  64. 64.

    Poole RC Halestrap AP. Transport of Lactate and Other Monocarboxylates Across Mammalian Plasma Membranes. Am J Physiol Physiol (1993 ) 264:C761–82

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpcell.1993.264.4.c761

  65. 65.

    Enerson BE Drewes LR. Molecular Features, Regulation, and Function of Monocarboxylate Transporters: Implications for Drug Delivery. J Pharm Sci (2003 ) 92:1531–44

    Not in our library10.1002/jps.10389

  66. 66.

    Graham C Gatherar I Haslam I Glanville M Simmons NL. Expression and Localization of Monocarboxylate Transporters and Sodium/Proton Exchangers in Bovine Rumen Epithelium. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol (2007 ) 292:R997–R1007

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpregu.00343.2006

  67. 67.

    Alarcón P Manosalva C Conejeros I Carretta MD Muñoz-Caro T Silva LMR. D(-) Lactic Acid-Induced Adhesion of Bovine Neutrophils Onto Endothelial Cells is Dependent on Neutrophils Extracellular Traps Formation and CD11b Expression. Front Immunol (2017 ) 8:975

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2017.00975

  68. 68.

    Halestrap AP Meredith D. The SLC16 Gene Family - From Monocarboxylate Transporters (MCTs) to Aromatic Amino Acid Transporters and Beyond. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol (2004 ) 447:619–28

    Not in our library10.1007/s00424-003-1067-2

  69. 69.

    Ullah MS Davies AJ Halestrap AP. The Plasma Membrane Lactate Transporter MCT4, But Not MCT1, is Up-Regulated by Hypoxia Through a HIF-1α-Dependent Mechanism. J Biol Chem (2006 ) 281:9030–7

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m511397200

  70. 70.

    Merezhinskaya N Ogunwuyi SA Mullick FG Fishbein WN. Presence and Localization of Three Lactic Acid Transporters (MCT1, -2, and -4) in Separated Human Granulocytes, Lymphocytes, and Monocytes. J Histochem Cytochem (2004 ) 52:1483–93

    Not in our library10.1369/jhc.4a6306.2004

  71. 71.

    Kirk P Wilson MC Heddle C Brown MH Barclay AN Halestrap AP. CD147 is Tightly Associated With Lactate Transporters MCT1 and MCT4 and Facilitates Their Cell Surface Expression. EMBO J (2000 ) 19:3896–904

    Not in our library10.1093/emboj/19.15.3896

  72. 72.

    Walters DK Arendt BK Jelinek DF. CD147 Regulates the Expression of MCT1 and Lactate Export in Multiple Myeloma Cells. Cell Cycle (2013 ) 12:3364–72

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.26193

  73. 73.

    Kong L Wang Z Liang X Wang Y Gao L Ma C. Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 Promotes Classical Microglial Activation and Pro-Inflammatory Effect via 6-Phosphofructo-2-Kinase/Fructose-2, 6-Biphosphatase 3. J Neuroinflamm (2019 ) 16:240

    Not in our library10.1186/s12974-019-1648-4

  74. 74.

    Fujii W Kawahito Y Nagahara H Kukida Y Seno T Yamamoto A. Monocarboxylate Transporter 4, Associated With the Acidification of Synovial Fluid, is a Novel Therapeutic Target for Inflammatory Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2015 ) 67:2888–96

    Not in our library10.1002/art.39270

  75. 75.

    Tan Z Xie N Banerjee S Cui H Fu M Thannickal VJ. The Monocarboxylate Transporter 4 is Required for Glycolytic Reprogramming and Inflammatory Response in Macrophages. J Biol Chem (2015 ) 290:46–55

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m114.603589

  76. 76.

    Manning Fox JE Meredith D Halestrap AP. Characterisation of Human Monocarboxylate Transporter 4 Substantiates its Role in Lactic Acid Efflux From Skeletal Muscle. J Physiol (2000 ) 529:285–93

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00285.x

  77. 77.

    Harmon DL Britton RA Prior RL Stock RA. Net Portal Absorption of Lactate and Volatile Fatty Acids in Steers Experiencing Glucose-Induced Acidosis or Fed a 70% Concentrate Diet Ad Libitum. J Anim Sci (1985 ) 60:560–9

    Not in our library10.2527/jas1985.602560x

  78. 78.

    Harmon DL Britton RA Prior RL. In Vitro Rates of Oxidation and Gluconeogenesis From L(+)- and D(-)Lactate in Bovine Tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol – Part B Biochem (1984 ) 77:365–8

    Not in our library10.1016/0305-0491(84)90344-4

  79. 79.

    Dunlop RH Hammond PB. D-Lactic Acidosis of Ruminants. Ann N Y Acad Sci (1965 ) 119:1109–32

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb47466.x

  80. 80.

    Pearce EL Pearce EJ. Metabolic Pathways in Immune Cell Activation and Quiescence. Immunity (2013 ) 38:633–43

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.005

  81. 81.

    Makowski L Chaib M Rathmell JC. Immunometabolism: From Basic Mechanisms to Translation. Immunol Rev (2020 ) 295:5–14

    Not in our library10.1111/imr.12858

  82. 82.

    Michalek RD Gerriets VA Jacobs SR Macintyre AN MacIver NJ Mason EF. Cutting Edge: Distinct Glycolytic and Lipid Oxidative Metabolic Programs Are Essential for Effector and Regulatory CD4 + T Cell Subsets. J Immunol (2011 ) 186:3299–303

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1003613

  83. 83.

    Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cancer Immunol Res (2017 ) 5:3–8

    Not in our library10.1158/2326-6066.cir-16-0297

  84. 84.

    Krawczyk CM Holowka T Sun J Blagih J Amiel E DeBerardinis RJ. Toll-Like Receptor-Induced Changes in Glycolytic Metabolism Regulate Dendritic Cell Activation. Blood (2010 ) 115:4742–9

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2009-10-249540

  85. 85.
  86. 86.
  87. 87.

    Bartok B Firestein GS. Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes: Key Effector Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Immunol Rev (2010 ) 233:233–55

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0105-2896.2009.00859.x

  88. 88.
  89. 89.

    Quiroga J Alarcón P Manosalva C Teuber S Taubert A Hermosilla C. Metabolic Reprogramming and Inflammatory Response Induced by D-Lactate in Bovine Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes Depends on HIF-1 Activity. Front Vet Sci (2021 ) 8:625347

    Not in our library10.3389/fvets.2021.625347

  90. 90.

    Végran F Boidot R Michiels C Sonveaux P Feron O. Lactate Influx Through the Endothelial Cell Monocarboxylate Transporter MCT1 Supports an NF-Kb/IL-8 Pathway That Drives Tumor Angiogenesis. Cancer Res (2011 ) 71:2550–60

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2828

  91. 91.
  92. 92.
  93. 93.

    Amulic B Cazalet C Hayes GL Metzler KD Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil Function: From Mechanisms to Disease. Annu Rev Immunol (2012 ) 30:459–89

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074942

  94. 94.

    Kaneider NC Leger AJ Kuliopulos A. Therapeutic Targeting of Molecules Involved in Leukocyte-Endothelial Cell Interactions. FEBS J (2006 ) 273:4416–24

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05441.x

  95. 95.

    Maianski NA Geissler J Srinivasula SM Alnemri ES Roos D Kuijpers TW. Functional Characterization of Mitochondria in Neutrophils: A Role Restricted to Apoptosis. Cell Death Differ (2004 ) 11:143–53

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.cdd.4401320

  96. 96.
  97. 97.

    Six E Lagresle-Peyrou C Susini S De Chappedelaine C Sigrist N Sadek H. AK2 Deficiency Compromises the Mitochondrial Energy Metabolism Required for Differentiation of Human Neutrophil and Lymphoid Lineages. Cell Death Dis (2015 ) 6:e1856–6

    Not in our library10.1038/cddis.2015.211

  98. 98.

    Borregaard N Herlin T. Energy Metabolism of Human Neutrophils During Phagocytosis. J Clin Invest (1982 ) 70:550–7

    Not in our library10.1172/jci110647

  99. 99.

    Quiroga J Alarcón P Manosalva C Taubert A Hermosilla C Hidalgo MA. Glycolysis and Mitochondrial Function Regulate the Radical Oxygen Species Production Induced by Platelet-Activating Factor in Bovine Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes. Vet Immunol Immunopathol (2020 ) 226:110074

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vetimm.2020.110074

  100. 100.

    Rodríguez-Espinosa O Rojas-Espinosa O Moreno-Altamirano MMB López-Villegas EO Sánchez-García FJ. Metabolic Requirements for Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Formation. Immunology (2015 ) 145:213–24

    Not in our library10.1111/imm.12437

  101. 101.

    Awasthi D Nagarkoti S Sadaf S Chandra T Kumar S Dikshit M. Glycolysis Dependent Lactate Formation in Neutrophils: A Metabolic Link Between NOX-Dependent and Independent NETosis. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Basis Dis (2019 ) 1865:165542

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.165542

  102. 102.

    Wang Y Li M Stadler S Correll S Li P Wang D. Histone Hypercitrullination Mediates Chromatin Decondensation and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation. J Cell Biol (2009 ) 184:205–13

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200806072

  103. 103.

    Li P Li M Lindberg MR Kennett MJ Xiong N Wang Y. PAD4 is Essential for Antibacterial Innate Immunity Mediated by Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. J Exp Med (2010 ) 207:1853–62

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20100239

  104. 104.

    Zhou E Conejeros I Gärtner U Mazurek S Hermosilla C Taubert A. Metabolic Requirements of Besnoitia Besnoiti Tachyzoite-Triggered NETosis. Parasitol Res (2020 ) 119:545–57

    Not in our library10.1007/s00436-019-06543-z

  105. 105.

    Alarcón P Conejeros I Carretta MD Concha C Jara E Tadich N. D-Lactic Acid Interferes With the Effects of Platelet Activating Factor on Bovine Neutrophils. Vet Immunol Immunopathol (2011 ) 144:68–78

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.07.012

  106. 106.

    Kelly B O’Neill LAJ. Metabolic Reprogramming in Macrophages and Dendritic Cells in Innate Immunity. Cell Res (2015 ) 25:771–84

    Not in our library10.1038/cr.2015.68

  107. 107.

    Hahn EL Halestrap AP Gamelli RL. Expression of the Lactate Transporter MCT1 in Macrophages. Shock (2000 ) 13:253–60

    Not in our library10.1097/00024382-200004000-00001

  108. 108.

    Samuvel DJ Sundararaj KP Nareika A Lopes-Virella MF Huang Y. Lactate Boosts TLR4 Signaling and NF-κb Pathway-Mediated Gene Transcription in Macrophages via Monocarboxylate Transporters and MD-2 Up-Regulation. J Immunol (2009 ) 182:2476–84

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0802059

  109. 109.

    Nareika A He L Game BA Slate EH Sanders JJ London SD. Sodium Lactate Increases LPS-Stimulated MMP and Cytokine Expression in U937 Histiocytes by Enhancing AP-1 and NF-κb Transcriptional Activities. Am J Physiol Metab (2005 ) 289:E534–42

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpendo.00462.2004

  110. 110.

    Kellum JA Song M Li J. Lactic and Hydrochloric Acids Induce Different Patterns of Inflammatory Response in LPS-Stimulated RAW 264.7 Cells. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol (2004 ) 286:R686–92

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpregu.00564.2003

  111. 111.
  112. 112.

    Bidani A Wang CZ Saggi SJ Heming TA. Evidence for pH Sensitivity of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Release by Alveolar Macrophages. Lung (1998 ) 176:111–21

    Not in our library10.1007/pl00007593

  113. 113.

    Zhang D Tang Z Huang H Zhou G Cui C Weng Y. Metabolic Regulation of Gene Expression by Histone Lactylation. Nature (2019 ) 574:575–80

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1

  114. 114.

    Zhou H Yan X-Y Yu W Liang X Du X Liu Z-C. Lactic Acid in Macrophage Polarization: The Significant Role in Inflammation and Cancer. Int Rev Immunol (2021 ) 25:1–15

    Not in our library10.1080/08830185.2021.1955876

  115. 115.

    Hoque R Farooq A Ghani A Gorelick F Mehal WZ. Lactate Reduces Liver and Pancreatic Injury in Toll-Like Receptor- and Inflammasome-Mediated Inflammation via GPR81-Mediated Suppression of Innate Immunity. Gastroenterology (2014 ) 146:1763–74

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.014

  116. 116.

    Dietl K Renner K Dettmer K Timischl B Eberhart K Dorn C. Lactic Acid and Acidification Inhibit TNF Secretion and Glycolysis of Human Monocytes. J Immunol (2010 ) 184:1200–9

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0902584

  117. 117.

    Mu X Shi W Xu Y Xu C Zhao T Geng B. Tumor-Derived Lactate Induces M2 Macrophage Polarization via the Activation of the ERK/STAT3 Signaling Pathway in Breast Cancer. Cell Cycle (2018 ) 17:428–38

    Not in our library10.1080/15384101.2018.1444305

  118. 118.

    Zhao Y Zhao B Wang X Guan G Xin Y Sun YD. Macrophage Transcriptome Modification Induced by Hypoxia and Lactate. Exp Ther Med (2019 ) 18:4811–9

    Not in our library10.3892/etm.2019.8164

  119. 119.

    Caslin HL Abebayehu D Abdul Qayum A Haque TT Taruselli MT Paez PA. Lactic Acid Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Mast Cell Function by Limiting Glycolysis and ATP Availability. J Immunol (2019 ) 203:453–64

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1801005

  120. 120.

    Abebayehu D Spence AJ Qayum AA Taruselli MT McLeod JJA Caslin HL. Lactic Acid Suppresses IL-33–Mediated Mast Cell Inflammatory Responses via Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α–Dependent miR-155 Suppression. J Immunol (2016 ) 197:2909–17

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1600651

  121. 121.

    Abebayehu D Spence AJ Caslin H Taruselli M Haque TT Kiwanuka KN. Lactic Acid Suppresses IgE-Mediated Mast Cell Function In Vitro and In Vivo. Cell Immunol (2019 ) 341:103918

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellimm.2019.04.006

  122. 122.

    Macintyre AN Gerriets VA Nichols AG Michalek RD Rudolph MC Deoliveira D. The Glucose Transporter Glut1 Is Selectively Essential for CD4 T Cell Activation and Effector Function. Cell Metab (2014 ) 20:61–72

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2014.05.004

  123. 123.

    Murray CM Hutchinson R Bantick JR Belfield GP Benjamin AD Brazma D. Monocarboxylate Transporter MCT1 is a Target for Immunosuppression. Nat Chem Biol (2005 ) 1:371–6

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio744

  124. 124.

    Ishimori T Saga T Mamede M Kobayashi H Higashi T Nakamoto Y. Increased (18)F-FDG Uptake in a Model of Inflammation: Concanavalin A-Mediated Lymphocyte Activation. J Nucl Med (2002 ) 43:658–63.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    Marjanovic S Eriksson I Nelson BD. Expression of a New Set of Glycolytic Isozymes in Activated Human Peripheral Lymphocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta (1990 ) 1087:1–6

    Not in our library10.1016/0167-4781(90)90113-g

  126. 126.

    Pearce EL Poffenberger MC Chang CH Jones RG. Fueling Immunity: Insights Into Metabolism and Lymphocyte Function. Sci (80- ) (2013 ) 342:6155

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1242454

  127. 127.

    Girardot T Rimmelé T Monneret G Textoris J Venet F. Intra-Cellular Lactate Concentration in T Lymphocytes From Septic Shock Patients — a Pilot Study. Intensive Care Med Exp (2018 ) 6:5

    Not in our library10.1186/s40635-018-0167-4

  128. 128.

    Degauque N Brosseau C Brouard S. Regulation of the Immune Response by the Inflammatory Metabolic Microenvironment in the Context of Allotransplantation. Front Immunol (2018 ) 9:1465

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2018.01465

  129. 129.
  130. 130.

    Chabaud M Durand JM Buchs N Fossiez F Page G Frappart L. Human Interleukin-17: A T Cell-Derived Proinflammatory Cytokine Produced by the Rheumatoid Synovium. Arthritis Rheum (1999 ) 42:963–70

    Not in our library10.1002/1529-0131(199905)42:5<963::aid-anr15>3.0.co;2-e

  131. 131.

    Pucino V Certo M Bulusu V Cucchi D Goldmann K Pontarini E. Lactate Buildup at the Site of Chronic Inflammation Promotes Disease by Inducing CD4+ T Cell Metabolic Rewiring. Cell Metab (2019 ) 30:1055–1074.e8

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2019.10.004

  132. 132.

    Certo M Tsai CH Pucino V Ho PC Mauro C. Lactate Modulation of Immune Responses in Inflammatory Versus Tumour Microenvironments. Nat Rev Immunol (2021 ) 21:151–61

    Not in our library10.1038/s41577-020-0406-2

  133. 133.

    Zou Y Zeng S Huang M Qiu Q Xiao Y Shi M. Inhibition of 6-Phosphofructo-2-Kinase Suppresses Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes-Mediated Synovial Inflammation and Joint Destruction in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Br J Pharmacol (2017 ) 174:893–908

    Not in our library10.1111/bph.13762

  134. 134.

    Falconer J Murphy AN Young SP Clark AR Tiziani S Guma M. Review: Synovial Cell Metabolism and Chronic Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2018 ) 70:984–99

    Not in our library10.1002/art.40504

  135. 135.

    Neveu MA Beziere N Daniels R Bouzin C Comment A Schwenck J. Lactate Production Precedes Inflammatory Cell Recruitment in Arthritic Ankles: An Imaging Study. Mol Imaging Biol (2020 ) 22:1324–32

    Not in our library10.1007/s11307-020-01510-y

  136. 136.

    Zhang L Luo J Wen H Zhang T Zuo X Li X. MDM2 Promotes Rheumatoid Arthritis via Activation of MAPK and NF-κb. Int Immunopharmacol (2016 ) 30:69–73

    Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2015.11.030

  137. 137.

    Zhou J-J Ma J-D Mo Y-Q Zheng D-H Chen L-F Wei X-N. Down-Regulating Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma Coactivator-1 Beta Alleviates the Proinflammatory Effect of Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes Through Inhibiting Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase, P38 and Nuclear Factor. Arthritis Res Ther (2014 ) 16:472

    Not in our library10.1186/s13075-014-0472-6

  138. 138.

    Chen DP Wong CK Tam LS Li EK Lam CWK. Activation of Human Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes by Uric Acid Crystals in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Cell Mol Immunol (2011 ) 8:469–78

    Not in our library10.1038/cmi.2011.35

  139. 139.

    Nah S-S Won H-J Ha E Kang I Cho HY Hur S-J. Epidermal Growth Factor Increases Prostaglandin E2 Production via ERK1/2 MAPK and NF-κb Pathway in Fibroblast Like Synoviocytes From Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Int (2010 ) 30:443–9

    Not in our library10.1007/s00296-009-0976-6

  140. 140.
  141. 141.

    Georganas C Liu H Perlman H Hoffmann A Thimmapaya B Pope RM. Regulation of IL-6 and IL-8 Expression in Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fibroblasts: The Dominant Role for NF-κb But Not C/Ebpβ or C-Jun. J Immunol (2000 ) 165:7199–206

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.7199

  142. 142.
  143. 143.

    Schaub A Fütterer A Pfeffer K. PUMA-G, an IFN-γ-Inducible Gene in Macrophages is a Novel Member of the Seven Transmembrane Spanning Receptor Superfamily. Eur J Immunol (2001 ) 31:3714–25

    Not in our library10.1002/1521-4141(200112)31:12<3714::aid-immu3714>3.0.co;2-1

  144. 144.

    Shi Y Lai X Ye L Chen K Cao Z Gong W. Activated Niacin Receptor HCA2 Inhibits Chemoattractant-Mediated Macrophage Migration via Gβγ/PKC/ERK1/2 Pathway and Heterologous Receptor Desensitization. Sci Rep (2017 ) 7:42279

    Not in our library10.1038/srep42279

  145. 145.

    Soga T Kamohara M Takasaki J Matsumoto SI Saito T Ohishi T. Molecular Identification of Nicotinic Acid Receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2003 ) 303:364–9

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00342-5

  146. 146.

    Tunaru S Kero J Schaub A Wufka C Blaukat A Pfeffer K. PUMA-G and HM74 are Receptors for Nicotinic Acid and Mediate its Anti-Lipolytic Effect. Nat Med (2003 ) 9:352–5

    Not in our library10.1038/nm824

  147. 147.

    Kostylina G Simon D Fey MF Yousefi S Simon HU. Neutrophil Apoptosis Mediated by Nicotinic Acid Receptors (GPR109A). Cell Death Differ (2008 ) 15:134–42

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.cdd.4402238

  148. 148.

    Maciejewski-Lenoir D Richman JG Hakak Y Gaidarov I Behan DP Connolly DT. Langerhans Cells Release Prostaglandin D2 in Response to Nicotinic Acid. J Invest Dermatol (2006 ) 126:2637–46

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.jid.5700586

  149. 149.

    Rahman M Muhammad S Khan MA Chen H Ridder DA Müller-Fielitz H. The β-Hydroxybutyrate Receptor HCA2 Activates a Neuroprotective Subset of Macrophages. Nat Commun (2014 ) 5:3944

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms4944

  150. 150.

    Hanson J Gille A Zwykiel S Lukasova M Clausen BE Ahmed K. Nicotinic Acid- and Monomethyl Fumarate-Induced Flushing Involves GPR109A Expressed by Keratinocytes and COX-2-Dependent Prostanoid Formation in Mice. J Clin Invest (2010 ) 120:2910–9

    Not in our library10.1172/jci42273

  151. 151.

    Yousefi S Cooper PR Mueck B Potter SL Jarai G. cDNA Representational Difference Analysis of Human Neutrophils Stimulated by GM-CSF. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2000 ) 277:401–9

    Not in our library10.1006/bbrc.2000.3678

  152. 152.

    Li Z McCafferty KJ Judd RL. Role of HCA2 in Regulating Intestinal Homeostasis and Suppressing Colon Carcinogenesis. Front Immunol (2021 ) 12:606384

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2021.606384

  153. 153.

    Takakura A Zandi-Nejad K. Lactate-Induced Activation of HCA2 Improves Survival in Mice With Sepsis. FASEB J (2019 ) 33:7625–34

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.201801982r

  154. 154.

    Hu J Cai M Liu Y Liu B Xue X Ji R. The Roles of GRP81 as a Metabolic Sensor and Inflammatory Mediator. J Cell Physiol (2020 ) 235:8938–50

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.29739

  155. 155.

    Liu C Wu J Zhu J Kuei C Yu J Shelton J. Lactate Inhibits Lipolysis in Fat Cells Through Activation of an Orphan G-Protein-Coupled Receptor, GPR81. J Biol Chem (2009 ) 284:2811–22

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m806409200

  156. 156.

    Dienel GA. Brain Lactate Metabolism: The Discoveries and the Controversies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2012 ) 32:1107–38

    Not in our library10.1038/jcbfm.2011.175

  157. 157.

    Langin D. Adipose Tissue Lipolysis Revisited (Again!): Lactate Involvement in Insulin Antilipolytic Action. Cell Metab (2010 ) 11:242–3

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.003

  158. 158.

    Ristic B Bhutia YD Ganapathy V. Cell-Surface G-Protein-Coupled Receptors for Tumor-Associated Metabolites: A Direct Link to Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta - Rev Cancer (2017 ) 1868:246–57

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.05.003

  159. 159.
  160. 160.

    Ranganathan P Shanmugam A Swafford D Suryawanshi A Bhattacharjee P Hussein MS. GPR81, a Cell-Surface Receptor for Lactate, Regulates Intestinal Homeostasis and Protects Mice From Experimental Colitis. J Immunol (2018 ) 200:1781–9

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1700604

  161. 161.

    Madaan A Nadeau-Vallée M Rivera JC Obari D Hou X Sierra EM. Lactate Produced During Labor Modulates Uterine Inflammation via GPR81 (Hca1). Am J Obstet Gynecol (2017 ) 216:60.e1–60.e17

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.072

  162. 162.
  163. 163.
  164. 164.

    Boitsova EB Morgun AV Osipova ED Pozhilenkova EA Martinova GP Frolova OV. The Inhibitory Effect of LPS on the Expression of GPR81 Lactate Receptor in Blood-Brain Barrier Model In Vitro. J Neuroinflamm (2018 ) 15:196

    Not in our library10.1186/s12974-018-1233-2

  165. 165.

    Sun Z Han Y Song S Chen T Han Y Liu Y. Activation of GPR81 by Lactate Inhibits Oscillatory Shear Stress-Induced Endothelial Inflammation by Activating the Expression of KLF2. IUBMB Life (2019 ) 71:2010–9

    Not in our library10.1002/iub.2151

  166. 166.

    Okajima F. Regulation of Inflammation by Extracellular Acidification and Proton-Sensing GPCRs. Cell Signal (2013 ) 25:2263–71

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.07.022

  167. 167.
  168. 168.

    Certo M Marone G de Paulis A Mauro C Pucino V. Lactate: Fueling the Fire Starter. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med (2020 ) 12:e1474

    Not in our library10.1002/wsbm.1474

  169. 169.

    Wang Y de Vallière C Imenez Silva PH Leonardi I Gruber S Gerstgrasser A. The Proton-Activated Receptor GPR4 Modulates Intestinal Inflammation. J Crohn’s Colitis (2018 ) 12:355–69

    Not in our library10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx147

  170. 170.

    Khan SY McLaughlin NJD Kelher MR Eckels P Gamboni-Robertson F Banerjee A. Lysophosphatidylcholines Activate G2A Inducing Gαi-1-/ Gαq/11- Ca2+ Flux, Gβγ-Hck Activation and Clathrin/β-Arrestin-1/GRK6 Recruitment in PMNs. Biochem J (2010 ) 432:35–45

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20091087

  171. 171.

    Kern K Schäfer SMG Cohnen J Pierre S Osthues T Tarighi N. The G2A Receptor Controls Polarization of Macrophage by Determining Their Localization Within the Inflamed Tissue. Front Immunol (2018 ) 9:2261

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2018.02261

  172. 172.

    Rikitake Y Hirata Ki Yamashita T Iwai K Kobayashi S Itoh H. Expression of G2A, a Receptor for Lysophosphatidylcholine, by Macrophages in Murine, Rabbit, and Human Atherosclerotic Plaques. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2002 ) 22:2049–53

    Not in our library10.1161/01.atv.0000040598.18570.54

  173. 173.

    Murakami N Yokomizo T Okuno T Shimizu T. G2A is a Proton-Sensing G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Antagonized by Lysophosphatidylcholine. J Biol Chem (2004 ) 279:42484–91

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m406561200

  174. 174.

    Chen P Zuo H Xiong H Kolar MJ Chu Q Saghatelian A. Gpr132 Sensing of Lactate Mediates Tumor-Macrophage Interplay to Promote Breast Cancer Metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2017 ) 114:580–5

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1614035114

  175. 175.

    Cheng WY Huynh H Chen P Peña-Llopis S Wan Y. Macrophage Pparγ Inhibits Gpr132 to Mediate the Anti-Tumor Effects of Rosiglitazone. Elife (2016 ) 5:e18501

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.18501

  176. 176.
  177. 177.
  178. 178.

    Krewson EA Sanderlin EJ Marie MA Akhtar SN Velcicky J Loetscher P. The Proton-Sensing GPR4 Receptor Regulates Paracellular Gap Formation and Permeability of Vascular Endothelial Cells. iScience (2020 ) 23:100848

    Not in our library10.1016/j.isci.2020.100848

  179. 179.

    Dong L Krewson E Yang L. Acidosis Activates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Pathways Through GPR4 in Human Vascular Endothelial Cells. Int J Mol Sci (2017 ) 18:278

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms18020278

  180. 180.

    Dong B Zhang X Fan Y Cao S Zhang X. Acidosis Promotes Cell Apoptosis Through the G Protein-Coupled Receptor 4/CCAAT/enhancer-Binding Protein Homologous Protein Pathway. Oncol Lett (2018 ) 16:6735–41

    Not in our library10.3892/ol.2018.9478

  181. 181.

    Sanderlin EJ Leffler NR Lertpiriyapong K Cai Q Hong H Bakthavatchalu V. GPR4 Deficiency Alleviates Intestinal Inflammation in a Mouse Model of Acute Experimental Colitis. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Basis Dis (2017 ) 1863:569–84

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.12.005

  182. 182.

    Kottyan LC Collier AR Cao KH Niese KA Hedgebeth M Radu CG. Eosinophil Viability is Increased by Acidic pH in a cAMP- and GPR65-Dependent Manner. Blood (2009 ) 114:2774–82

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2009-05-220681

  183. 183.

    Wang JQ Kon J Mogi C Tobo M Damirin A Sato K. TDAG8 is a Proton-Sensing and Psychosine-Sensitive G-Protein-Coupled Receptor. J Biol Chem (2004 ) 279:45626–33

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m406966200

  184. 184.

    Mogi C Tobo M Tomura H Murata N He X Sato K. Involvement of Proton-Sensing TDAG8 in Extracellular Acidification-Induced Inhibition of Proinflammatory Cytokine Production in Peritoneal Macrophages. J Immunol (2009 ) 182:3243–51

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0803466

  185. 185.

    He Xd Tobo M Mogi C Nakakura T Komachi M Murata N. Involvement of Proton-Sensing Receptor TDAG8 in the Anti-Inflammatory Actions of Dexamethasone in Peritoneal Macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2011 ) 415:627–31

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.10.122

  186. 186.

    Murata N Mogi C Tobo M Nakakura T Sato K Tomura H. Inhibition of Superoxide Anion Production by Extracellular Acidification in Neutrophils. Cell Immunol (2009 ) 259:21–6

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.05.008

  187. 187.

    Aoki H Mogi C Hisada T Nakakura T Kamide Y Ichimonji I. Proton-Sensing Ovarian Cancer G Protein-Coupled Receptor 1 on Dendritic Cells Is Required for Airway Responses in a Murine Asthma Model. PloS One (2013 ) 8:e79985

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0079985

  188. 188.

    Yan L Singh LS Zhang L Xu Y. Role of OGR1 in Myeloid-Derived Cells in Prostate Cancer. Oncogene (2014 ) 33:157–64

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2012.566

  189. 189.

    De Vallière C Wang Y Eloranta JJ Vidal S Clay I Spalinger MR. G Protein-Coupled pH-Sensing Receptor OGR1 is a Regulator of Intestinal Inflammation. Inflammation Bowel Dis (2015 ) 21:1269–81

    Not in our library10.1097/mib.0000000000000375

  190. 190.

    D’Souza CA Zhao FL Li X Xu Y Dunn SE Zhang L. OGR1/GPR68 Modulates the Severity of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis and Regulates Nitric Oxide Production by Macrophages. PloS One (2016 ) 11:e0148439

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0148439

  191. 191.

    Matsuzaki S Ishizuka T Yamada H Kamide Y Hisada T Ichimonji I. Extracellular Acidification Induces Connective Tissue Growth Factor Production Through Proton-Sensing Receptor OGR1 in Human Airway Smooth Muscle Cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2011 ) 413:499–503

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.087

  192. 192.

    Tomura H Wang JQ Komachi M Damirin A Mogi C Tobo M. Prostaglandin I2 Production and cAMP Accumulation in Response to Acidic Extracellular pH Through OGR1 in Human Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells. J Biol Chem (2005 ) 280:34458–64

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m505287200

  193. 193.

    De Vallière C Vida S Clay I Jurisic G Tcymbarevich I Lang S. The pH-Sensing Receptor OGR1 Improves Barrier Function of Epithelial Cells and Inhibits Migration in an Acidic Environment. Am J Physiol - Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2015 ) 309:G475–90

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00408.2014

  194. 194.

    De Vallière C Cosin-Roger J Simmen S Atrott K Melhem H Zeitz J. Hypoxia Positively Regulates the Expression of pH-Sensing G-Protein-Coupled Receptor OGR1 (Gpr68). Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol (2016 ) 2:796–810

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.06.003

  195. 195.

    Kadowaki M Yamada H Sato K Shigemi H Umeda Y Morikawa M. Extracellular Acidification-Induced CXCL8 Production Through a Proton-Sensing Receptor OGR1 in Human Airway Smooth Muscle Cells: A Response Inhibited by Dexamethasone. J Inflammation (2019 ) 16:4

    Not in our library10.1186/s12950-019-0207-1

  196. 196.

    Ichimonji I Tomura H Mogi C Sato K Aoki H Hisada T. Extracellular Acidification Stimulates IL-6 Production and Ca2+ Mobilization Through Proton-Sensing OGR1 Receptors in Human Airway Smooth Muscle Cells. Am J Physiol - Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2010 ) 299:567–77

    Not in our library10.1152/ajplung.00415.2009

Cited by papers we hold 5

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.