Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Macrophage-Osteoclast Associations: Origin, Polarization, and Subgroups

Yang Sun, Jiangbi Li, Xiaoping Xie and 4 more

Frontiers in Immunology · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.778078

Abstract

Cellular associations in the bone microenvironment are involved in modulating the balance between bone remodeling and resorption, which is necessary for maintaining a normal bone morphology. Macrophages and osteoclasts are both vital components of the bone marrow. Macrophages can interact with osteoclasts and regulate bone metabolism by secreting a variety of cytokines, which make a significant contribution to the associations. Although, recent studies have fully explored either macrophages or osteoclasts, indicating the significance of these two types of cells. However, it is of high importance to report the latest discoveries on the relationships between these two myeloid-derived cells in the field of osteoimmunology. Therefore, this paper reviews this topic from three novel aspects of the origin, polarization, and subgroups based on the previous work, to provide a reference for future research and treatment of bone-related diseases.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

The skeleton is a complex organ that facilitates locomotion, retains blood calcium concentration, provides stable support to soft tissues, and is a site for adult hematopoiesis. Continued bone remodeling is necessary to maintain these crucial functions by preventing the accumulation of bone injuries, and sustaining both calcium homeostasis and bone strength. The remodeling of bone is a tightly-coupled process that involves osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Among them, osteoclasts are multinucleated cells that develop from the fusion of osteoclast precursors (OCPs) through the activation of macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) and receptor activator of NF‐kB ligand (RANKL), which can secret H+, Cl-, cathepsin K (CtsK), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Importantly, osteoclasts are the only bone-resorbing cells in the human body, and are crucial for remodeling of the skeletal system.

On the other hand, macrophages are phagocytes from the mononuclear myeloid lineage. They are known for their protective roles in eliminating pathogens and recruitment of other immune cells from the peripheral circulation to the sites of infection and inflammation. These cells have evolved; emphasizing their distinct and critical significance in almost all tissues. Moreover, most tissues and organs host a resident group of macrophages that have adapted to the local conditions and are able to perform crucial tissue-specific functions in order to maintain homeostasis. For instance, osteal macrophages, which are the resident tissue macrophages in bones, perform various functions in the bone microenvironment. Besides, macrophages can change their functional and phenotypic properties in response to signals released from the immediate environment. Based on their activation states, macrophages can be categorized into M1 and M2 subtypes. In fact, M1- and M2-like macrophages share several features with T helper (Th) 1/Th2 cells. It has been reported that M1 macrophages are antimicrobial and proinflammatory, whereas M2 macrophages are anti-inflammatory. Various physiological processes, including skeletal homeostasis, depend on the balance between M1 and M2 macrophages.

In the field of osteoimmunity, immune and skeletal systems share numerous biological factors, such as chemokines, cytokines, hormones, etc. In addition, the interactions between osteoclasts and macrophages exert an indispensable influence in this area. Despite the well-established wealth of knowledge on macrophage genesis, activity, and polarization, the relationships between macrophages and osteoclasts in osteoimmunity still need further elucidation. In this article, we primarily focused on the effect of macrophage polarization on osteoclasts. We found that various cytokines, such as interleukins (ILs), chemokines, and tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) produced during the polarization process are intimately associate with he differentiation, activity, and survival of osteoclasts. Furthermore, we complementarily described the monocyte/macrophage origin of osteoclasts and the relationships between macrophage subpopulations and osteoclasts. In general, we summarized the current knowledge on macrophage-osteoclast interactions from diverse perspectives to provide references for future studies.

The Monocyte/Macrophage Origin of Osteoclasts

Various theories have been propounded to account for the origin of osteoclasts since they were discovered in 1873. However, Walker’s pioneering experiments in the 1970s confirmed their hematopoietic origin, as transfusions of spleen and myeloid cells from wild-type mice reversed bone resorption in osteosclerotic and osteopetrotic mice lacking osteoclasts. This demonstrated that hematopoietic organs are capable of generating cells that cause hard tissues to resorb. In 1986, Scheven and coworkers were the first to show that osteoclasts can be produced from a subgroup of cells that are rich in hemopoietic progenitors. In 1990, the monocyte/macrophage origin of osteoclast was later certified by Udagawa and partners after they proved that hemopoietic stem cells differentiate into the monocyte-macrophages through the activation of M-CSF. Subsequent studies further confirmed that osteoclasts can be formed from monocyte-macrophage precursor cells as well as from mature macrophages in tissues.

Furthermore, bones and bone marrow contain three unique macrophage populations, namely: osteoclasts and bone marrow macrophages (erythroid island macrophages), hematopoietic stem cell macrophages, and a newly-discovered group of macrophages called osteal macrophages or “osteomacs”. This also suggests that osteoclasts and macrophages may have a similar origin. Studies have shown that cells from the mononuclear/macrophage system, which contain hematopoietic marrow cells, blood monocytes, and peritoneal macrophages, possess the ability to develop into bone-resorbing osteoclasts; thus, squarely classifying osteoclastic groups within these series of cells. In fact, osteoclast and macrophage are the two differentiation products from myeloid precursors that compete with each other. In summary, osteoclasts are generated by a series of processes that begins with the commitment of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to the mononuclear/phagocyte series, followed by the proliferation of pre-osteoclasts, and final maturation into osteoclasts, which possess bone-resorbing capacity.

In the diverse colony-forming units (CFUs), which generate various myeloid cells, only the CFU macrophages, when exposed to M-CSF, evolve into macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) progenitor (MDP). MDP is a bipotent progenitor which undergoes osteoclastic differentiation ( Figure 1 ). In addition to the differentiation of myeloid progenitors into osteoclasts, macrophages also serve as an osteoclastic source. Osteoclasts can be formed from tissue-specific macrophages in inflammatory and immunological environments ( Figure 1 ). For example, osteoclasts can be differentiated from osteal macrophages and synovial macrophages in an inflammatory condition. Further, premature DCs can develop into typical DCs, while they can also become osteoclasts when exposed to M-CSF and RANKL ( Figure 1 ).

On the basis of CD14 and CD16 antigens expression, monocytes are divided into three groups: classical (CD14++CD16−), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and nonclassical (CD14+CD16++). According to this hypothesis, classical monocytes are the major source of osteoclasts, while intermediate monocytes can transform into high-absorption-capacity osteoclasts during inflammation, with non-classical monocytes evolving into non-resorbable osteoclasts. The study has reported that the intermediate monocytes convert into M1-macrophages to perform crucial functions in inflammation of the synovium. However, findings have shown that the classical monocytes account for the vast majority of monocytes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This suggests that in an inflammatory environment, the main cells that are recruited are still classical monocytes, while the main role is played by M1-type macrophages which differentiate from intermediate monocytes. A recent study has identified an erythromyeloid progenitor (EMP)-derived osteoclast precursor population. Yolk-sac macrophages of EMP origin produced neonatal osteoclasts that can create a space for postnatal bone marrow hematopoiesis. Furthermore, EMPs gave rise to long-lasting OCPs that contribute to postnatal bone remodeling in both physiological and pathological settings. Single-cell RNA-sequencing data showed that EMP-derived OCPs arose independently of the HSC lineage, and the data from fate-tracking of EMP and HSC lineages indicated the possibility of cell-cell fusion between these two lineages. Cx3cr1+ yolk-sac macrophage descendants reside in the adult spleen, and parabiosis experiments showed that these cells migrated through the bloodstream to the remodeled bone after injury. Another study also found that the postnatal maintenance of osteoclasts, bone mass, and bone marrow cavity involves iterative fusion of circulating blood monocytic cells with long-lived osteoclast syncytia.

Polarization of Macrophages: Influence on Osteoclasts

Since Elie Metchnikoff first defined these phagocytic cells over a century ago, the forms and roles of macrophages are becoming increasingly diverse. The ability of macrophages to modify their phenotypic features due to different external stimuli is known as activation ( Figure 2 ). Alternatively activated macrophages (AAM; M2) were described in the early 1990s as possessing a distinct phenotype of macrophages from the traditionally activated or inflammatory macrophages (M1). This categorization was developed as a result of the phenotypic changes observed in vitro after treatment with a variety of chemicals. Following the discovery of the M1/M2 macrophage paradigm, more evidence was found to support the idea that between these two seemingly opposed resultant phenotypes, there is a transitional form of intermediate phenotypes. Recently, a human macrophage with an open spectrum of activation, as identified by transcriptional clusters associated with diverse stimulations, was reported in a study. Under this condition, scholars have gradually coined the terminology ‘polarization’ to describe the disruption of macrophages by some stimuli, which induce various patterns of gene expression. However, the M1/M2 terminology was eventually accepted due to the discovery of different features of macrophages in cells generated from Th1 or Th2 dominant mouse lineages.

It is worth noting that the metabolic state of macrophages and osteoclasts is dependent on “activation” status, which itself is closely related to external stimuli or the disease environment. In pathological conditions, macrophages tend to be activated as M1-type macrophages that secrete proinflammatory cytokines against pathogens. Specifically, in inflammatory conditions, for example, following an infection, inflammatory stimuli, such as IL-12, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interferon (IFN)-γ, and reactive oxygen species (ROS), that are generated by a damaged or necrotic tissue, promote polarization of macrophages into M1 phenotype. This is mediated by signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1, and interferon-regulatory factor (IRF) 5. As an important inflammatory response, polarized M1 can produce high levels of ROS, nitric oxide (NO), and proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, which are involved in enhancing the host’s defense response. Under non-inflammatory conditions, macrophages largely exhibit the M2 phenotype which promotes tissue homeostasis and repair. Specifically, M2 macrophages are mainly present in the subsiding phase of inflammation, and they are responsible for the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines and the clearance of apoptotic cells. Exposure to anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13), IL-1 receptor ligands, or immune complexes and Toll-like receptors (TLRs) can lead to M2 macrophage polarization via STAT6 and IRF4. M2 macrophages can produce anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 18 (CCL-18), CCL-22, IL-10, and a small amount of IL-12 family members. In addition, M2 macrophages can produce a large number of osteogenic growth factors, such as bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), a subclass of the TGF-β family and a potent promoter to osteogenic differentiation of MSCs, TGF-β, osteopontin, and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. M1 macrophage-related cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, can induce osteoclastogenesis, while the M2 macrophage-related cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-10, can inhibit osteoclastogenesis through the downregulation of NFATc1. Thus, the polarization of macrophages (M1/M2) itself is important for the determination of osteoclastogenesis, which makes the interaction between macrophages and osteoclasts even more complex.

Similar to macrophages, the metabolic state of osteoclasts is also closely related to the disease conditions. For instance, the seminal study of Trouillet-Assant et al. discovered that infection of bone marrow-derived OCPs with live S. aureus promoted their differentiation into activated macrophages rather than osteoclasts. However, the cultivation of OCPs with only the supernatants of the infected macrophages promoted the differentiation into bone-resorbing cells, due to the secreted proinflammatory cytokines they contained. Infection of mature osteoclasts with S. aureus promoted their bone-resorbing capacity in a hydroxyapatite matrix degradation assay which proceeded with enhanced cellular fusion events, and a higher number of nuclei per osteoclast with a significantly increased size. Similarly, when fractures occur, osteoclasts can be activated via the RANKL pathway. Subsequently, immature HSC precursors are recruited via CXCR4 and MMP-9 pathways to promote HSC migration.

M1 Polarization and Osteoclasts

In inflammatory conditions, for instance, after an infection, inflammatory stimuli, such as IL-12, IFN-γ, and ROS, that are generated by damaged or necrotic tissue, promote the polarization of macrophages into M1 phenotype, resulting in the release of cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1, and others to affect osteoclast differentiation and formation ( Table 1 ).

Osteoclastogenesis is promoted via TNF-α both directly by increasing OCP population and/or differentiation, and indirectly by enhancing RANKL secretion in osteoblasts and other cells. Moreover, TNF-α has been reported to be able to change CD11b+F4/80+ cells (bone marrow cells) from Ly6C−Gr1−M2 macrophages to Ly6C−Gr1−CD11c+ and Ly6C+Gr1−CD11c+ M1 macrophages. Pretreatment of M-CSF-stimulated mouse bone marrow with TNF-α increased osteoclast progenitor population, resulting in an increased number of osteoclasts generated by Ly6C-Gr1 and Ly6C+Gr1- monocyte series. This may indicate that the function of TNF-α is to boost osteoclastic precursors by changing the M-CSF-activated M2 differentiation to M1 macrophages, with elevated osteoclastogenesis potentials. IL-1 can also promote osteoclastogenesis by downregulating osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels and upregulating RANKL levels.

Lipocytes, muscle cells, and lymphocytes all generate IL-6, which is part of the cytokine family that also includes IL-11, IL-27, oncostatin M (OSM), and others. In response to injuries, IL-6 is generated locally and released into the bloodstream, where it triggers a rapid immune response. Osteocytes and osteoblasts have been shown to be potently stimulated by IL-6 to produce RANKL. The interaction of IL-6/IL-6 receptor and glycoprotein 130 (gp130) receptor can ignite Janus-activated kinase (JAK) and cause the phosphorylation of STAT3, allowing RANKL to enhance osteoclastic development. Treatment with STAT3 blocker, CP690,550, decreased expression of the IL-6 family members, and also the generation of osteoclast both in vivo and in vitro. Importantly, the potential of IL-6 to stimulate osteoclastogenesis is determined by the presence of IL-6 receptors on osteoblasts, but not on OCPs. The membrane-bound IL-6 receptors (IL-6Rs), and the soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R) are the two major transmitters that transduce IL-6 signals significantly. Interaction of IL-6 with IL-6R results in the dimerization with common signaling receptor subunit gp130, and subsequent downstream signaling transduction through phosphorylation of the JAK/STAT pathway. In cells without membrane-bound IL-6R, the interaction of IL-6 with sIL-6R results in the formation of a molecule that can combine with membrane-bound gp130 and activate downstream signaling. Soluble IL-6R signaling is hypothesized to be involved in the proinflammatory effects of IL-6 on several tissues. In addition, the effects of TNF-α and IL-1 on human osteoclastogenesis can also be mediated by IL-6.

As a result of its significant bone-resorbing property, IL-1 was first classified as an osteoclast-activating factor. The adaptor molecule, MyD88, is activated by IL-1 to initiate signaling pathways that result in the initiation of NF-κB and MAPKs, as well as downstream transcription factors that promote gene expression and osteoclast formation. The IL-1 gene family contains a number of different members, including: IL-1α, IL-1β, and the IL-1R antagonist (IL-1Ra). IL-1α and IL-1β are agonists, while IL-1Ra is a specialized receptor antagonist. Among these members, IL-1β is one of the key mediators of bone resorption in inflammatory conditions. IL-1β promotes TNF-α-stimulated osteoclast formation by improving the synthesis of RANKL in mesenchymal cells. In the presence of adequate RANKL concentrations, IL-1β directly promotes the development of OCPs under the regulation of p38 MAPK. Moreover, since IL-1R is localized on the osteoclast surface, IL-1β and other IL-1s can suppress the apoptosis of osteoclasts by activating the NF-κB pathway. However, IL-1β is a multifaceted cytokine with mostly pro-osteoclastogenesis features, but can also employ negative feedback mechanisms that attenuate osteoclast formation. IL-1β is greatly time-dependent in its impacts on osteoclastogenesis. As shown in earlier projects with mouse cells and as demonstrated in multiple experiments employing human OCPs, exposure to IL-1β before or simultaneously with RANKL inhibits osteoclast formation. Conversely, exposure to IL-1β post-RANKL treatment has the reverse result, i.e., enhancing osteoclast development and resorptive activity. The reason for this phenomenon is that IL-1Rs share a cytosolic Toll-IL-1R domain and common intracellular signaling molecules with TLR, so IL-1β can directly block the initial phases of human osteoclast maturation by dropping of the M-CSF receptor, c-Fms, that is essential for RANK synthesis after binding with TLRs. In addition to IL-β, IL-1α is also known to be a potent osteoclastogenic cytokine. IL-1α also requires adequate RANKL concentrations to trigger the expression of OC biomarkers, such as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), CtsK, MMP-9, and nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1). Furthermore, regardless of RANKL, IL-1 may promote OC differentiation in bone marrow macrophages by activating the microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF).

The cytokines, IL-12 and IL-23, which are reported to perform a key part in inflammatory responses, participate in the inflammation-induced bone abnormalities. IL-12, composed of p35 and p40, is one of the key factors influencing osteoclasts. IL-12 is mainly produced by macrophages and DCs, and is essential for Th cell formation and activity. IFN-γ is the main product of activated Th cells. This factor prevents osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and causes damage to the cells. Notably, IFN-γ is also a powerful blocker of osteoclast differentiation. Briefly, it can inhibit osteoclast differentiation by decreasing CtsK levels or increasing the decomposition of tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 6 (TRAF6). In addition, IL-12 itself can also inhibit osteoclast activity. Mechanistically, IL-12 can downregulate NFATc1 expression, and thus inhibit RANKL-induced osteoclastogenic potentials. Also, IL-12 can promote TNF-α-induced osteoclast apoptosis via the FAS/FASL pathway. IL-23, composed of p40 and p19 subunits, is also a member of the IL-12 family. The overexpression of IL-23 has been reported to increase Th1 production and induce significant bone loss in mice. Further studies demonstrated that bone marrow macrophages isolated from IL-23 knockout mice possessed diminished osteoclast capacity and resorption efficiency. The two main mechanisms through which IL-23 positively regulates osteoclasts involve either directly increasing RANK expression in OCPs or indirectly promoting RANKL production in CD4+ T cells. Furthermore, IL-23 can affect osteoclasts through its regulation of IL-17 secretion. In the presence of IL-17, the transformation of OCPs into osteoclasts is inhibited and the secretion of MMP-9 and CtsK by mature osteoclasts is reduced. Follow-up studies have shown that activation of NF-κB, p38, and ERK signaling pathways is the main mechanism by which IL-17 acts.

IL-18, like IL-12, also inhibits the formation of osteoclasts, and both have a synergistic effect. In combination with IL-12, IL-18 prevents the formation of osteoclasts more effectively. In addition, IL-18, similar to IL-12, was originally recognized as an IFN-inducing agent, and studies have demonstrated that the two cytokines work in tandem, with combination therapy leading to considerably more IFN-γ production than either IL alone. IFN-γ can induce cell apoptosis and suppress osteoclast differentiation. Of note, IL-18 can also inhibit osteoclast bone resorption partially mediated by IL-6. Mechanistically, by modulating the synthesis of M-CSF and granulocyte-macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM-CSF) through T-cells, IL-18 inhibits the differentiation of osteoclasts, and induces apoptosis of osteoclasts by the generation of NO. However, some studies have reported that in RA synovitis, IL-18 can indirectly induce osteoclastogenesis by upregulating RANKL synthesis through T cells. Therefore, the effects of macrophages on osteoclasts still need to be discussed.

Most commonly referenced ROS are hydroxyl radicals (HO·), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hyperoxide (superoxide) anions (O2-). It is important to note that cell reproduction, viability, apoptosis, maturation, motility, and metabolic activity are all regulated by ROS. ROS are critical secondary intracellular messengers involved in numerous physiological activities, such as apoptosis, epigenetics, and the initiation of cell signal transductions. ROS are primarily generated by mitochondrial metabolism, particularly by ETC complexes I and II, where oxygen utilization results in ROS generation due to the reverse electron transfer between the complexes and molecular oxygen. Also, ROS could be produced in the cytosol by the oxidative process of NADPH oxidases (NOX). It has been known for many years that the activities and development of osteoclasts are regulated by ROS. Exposure of macrophages to exogenous ROS, such as H2O2, causes the RANK signaling cascade to become activated, resulting in the development of osteoclasts, whereas RANKL initiation causes the synthesis of endogenous ROS, which subsequently functions as a second messenger to induce the conversion of macrophages into osteoclasts. RANKL can enhance the levels of intracellular ROS throughout osteoclastogenesis by initiating signaling pathways that include: TRAF6 and NOX1. There is growing evidence that the activities of important osteoclast transcription factors, such as NF-κB and NFATc1, may also be influenced by ROS. Furthermore, the production of ROS by RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts has been shown to suppress the synthesis of antioxidant proteins like catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). As a result, ROS can be regarded as a crucial signaling messenger during osteoclastogenesis. In osteoclast-mediated diabetic osteoporosis, the over-activation of ROS/MAPKs/NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway is also the main cause of osteoclast resorption.

NO is a free radical that regulates many physiological activities, including vascular relaxation, neurotransmission, platelet aggregation, and immunological control. In vivo, NO is generated by the enzyme NO synthase (NOS). It is known as NOS for its ability to catalyze the oxidation of guanidine nitrogen from L-arginine in the presence of calcium ions, NADH, and tetrahydrobiopterin as co-factors. NO and NOS have been shown to have a significant influence on bone cell activity in recent years. The effects of NO on skeletal structures have been shown to be extremely concentration-dependent, according to recent research reports. The impacts of NO on osteoclast development and survival are similar to those seen in osteoblasts: a low level of NO enhances, whereas an excess of NO suppresses. In vivo, NOS1 performs necessary functions for the development and survival of osteoclasts because NOS1-lacking mice exhibited significantly reduced osteoclast production, and in vitro, NOS1-lacking bone marrow monocytes formed dysfunctional osteoclasts. Also, the synthesis of NOS2 in OCPs is induced by RANKL, and NOS2 produces high NO concentrations that suppress osteoclastogenesis in a cGMP-independent manner. A subsequent study in vitro has shown that OCPs from NOS2-lacking mice were prone to differentiate more easily and form bone pits more quickly. Additionally, the production of NOS2 by IL-1 and IFN-γ has also been shown to inhibit the activities of osteoclasts.

Chemokines are dynamic molecules that are released in response to inflammatory conditions. They serve as a key regulator in osteoclast formation. Inflammatory osteo-disorders cause C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)8, CXCL9, CXCL10, and chemoattractant chemokine ligand (CCL)20 concentrations to rise. According to recent research reports, CXCL8 and CCL20 seem to have a contribution to osteoclast generation via regulating IL-6 synthesis in primordial osteoblasts. Likewise, CXCL10 enhances the secretion of RANKL and TNF-α in stimulated CD4+ T cells, which subsequently stimulates osteoclast formation. Mutually, CXCL10 synthesis in OC precursors is also induced by RANKL. CXCL2, which is produced by RANKL activation, promotes the procreation of OC progenitors by activating ERK. Osteoblast-derived CX3C chemokine ligand (CX3CL)1 enhances osteoclastogenesis by causing OC precursors to adhere to the site of bone resorption. CCL4 is a key regulator of OC motility through the promotion of PI3K activity, according to recent findings. In addition, CCL2 (MIP-1), CCL5 (RANTES), CCL7 (MCP-3), and CXCL12 (SDF-1) can also promote motility, adherence, absorption, and survivability of OC.

M2 Polarization and Osteoclasts

M2 macrophages are mostly found during the descending stages of infection and they secrete anti-inflammatory factors, e.g., IL-10. In addition, M2 macrophages can generate several osteogenic growth factors, such as BMP-2, TGF-β1, OPN, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3). Through these factors, M2 macrophages further exert their influence on osteoblasts ( Table 2 ).

As a founding member of the IL-10 cytokine family, IL-10 demonstrates immune suppressive properties in a wide spectrum. In addition to the IL-10 molecule, this cytokine community includes the IL-20 subfamily system (IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, IL-24) as well as the more genetically distinct IFN family (IL-28A, IL-28B, IL-29). IL-10 is produced by a subpopulation of Th2 cells and possesses the ability to inhibit secretions by Th1 cells. Therefore, IL-10 was originally labeled as a secretory cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor (CSIF). As research progresses, various immune cells, such as macrophages, DCs, mast cells, eosinophils, neutrophils, natural killer cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, have been found to secrete IL-10. All of these cells are derived from the innate and acquired immune systems. IL-10 has been demonstrated in some trials to prevent osteoclast formation. Actually, through interference with NFATc1 activation and nuclear translocation, IL-10 is a robust osteoclastogenesis inhibitor. OPG synthesis is upregulated by IL-10, while RANKL and M-CSF expressions are downregulated. IL-10 suppresses osteoclastic activity by blocking the generation of pro-osteoclast factors, like IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α. Therefore, IL-10 can be classified as an anti-osteoclastogenic cytokine.

BMP-2 is a member of the BMP family of proteins, and also belongs to the TGF cytokine superfamily. M2 macrophages are the main secretors of BMP-2 compared to M0- and M1-type macrophages. Previous studies have shown that BMP-2 becomes a potent inducer of bone remodeling by directly regulating osteoclast differentiation and osteoblast activity. Specifically, by regulating the synthesis of RANKL and M-CSF, BMP-2 organizes osteoclast differentiation and manages osteoclast survival, maturation, and activation. The significance of BMP-2-induced phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and its downstream target AKT kinase has been identified in BMP-2-involved osteoblast maturation, and M-CSF secretion from osteoblasts to promote osteoclastogenesis. In addition, through a self-regulatory circuit including Smad/Akt/Ca2+ signaling pathway, BMP-2 can also activate the NFATc1 transcription factor. NFATc1 promotes osteoclast differentiation through transcriptional activation of RANKL, which in turn stimulates the production of NFATc1. It can be seen that BMP-2 performs a key function in the formation, development, and activation of osteoclasts.

TGF-β1, which is required for skeletal metabolism, can be synthesized by macrophages. The osteoclastogenic transcription factor, NF-κB, which is made up of proteins like p65, is part of the RANKL-RANK signaling pathway and the main downstream controller of this pathway is NFATc1. TGF-β1 has been demonstrated to limit the production and matrix degradation of osteoclast by directly inhibiting the expression of NFATc1 via obstruction p65 in the receptor activator.

OPN is a highly phosphorylated glycophosphoprotein with acidic properties and a high aspartic acid content. As a versatile factor, OPN is involved in the processes of inflammation, biomineralization, cell viability, and wound healing, as well as cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and renal calculus formation. OPN is secreted from osteoblasts and osteoclasts in osteoid. Research activities on mice with OPN genes knocked out show that the volume and length of the ruffled margins on the osteoclasts were several folds lower implying poorer resorptive potentials. In RA, OPN expressions can be aided by many factors in synovial tissues, and OPN is an active factor in the recruitment of osteoclasts by acting as a coupling agent of osteoclasts to bones. Moreover, OPN affects organisms by modulating osteoclast activity and altering CD44 receptors, as well as through the secretion levels of cytokines, like IL-10, IL-12, IL–3, IFN-γ, integrin vB3, NF-κB. Furthermore, OPN, which is one of the most firmly coupled non-collagen proteins, is thought to aid in the adhesion of osteoclasts to the surface bones. In summary, during the biomineralization stage, OPN has three key functions, namely: regulation of osseous cell attachment, regulation of osteoclastic activity, and regulation of matrix calcification.

The active form of vitamin D, i.e., 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (also called calcitriol), is a steroid molecule that balances calcium and bone metabolism, regulates cell proliferation and differentiation, and exerts immunoregulatory functions. Some research reports have shown that calcitriol possesses the ability to suppress osteoclastogenesis, while also promoting osteogenic differentiation. In fact, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 can inhibit osteoclast differentiation by downregulating PAR2 mRNA expression which contributes to the determination of cells of osteoclast lineages. Furthermore, findings have uncovered the interactions between the BMP-Smad1 and IκB-NF-κB pathways in the process of osteoclast formation. Through the BMP-Smad1 and IκB-NF-κB pathways, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 can also influence osteoclast lineage commitment. Calcitriol suppresses osteoclastogenesis by altering the quantity and function of Th cell subgroups (Th2/Th17) under an inflammatory condition. However, there are also reports indicating the promoting role of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in osteoclastogenesis. For example, applying high doses of calcitriol to congenital osteoporosis promotes the production of osteoclasts and generates certain effects. In addition, genetic effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 are exerted by its coupling of vitamin D receptor (VDR) to VDR response elements (VDREs) in the promoter sequences of target genes for vitamin D. More so, VDREs include genes of commonly-expressed proteins, such as RANKL, associated with adjustment of osteoclastogenesis. It can be seen that the role of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in osteoclastogenesis needs to be further assessed.

The Relationship Between Subgroups of Macrophages and Osteoclasts

Macrophages are a type of innate immune cells that may be present in almost every tissue and exert effects on immunological responses, wound-healing, and homeostasis. Macrophages that are distributed in various tissues are called tissue-resident macrophages. Tissue-resident macrophages were formerly thought of as differentiated monocytes that seeded the tissues and performed immunological sentinel and homeostatic activities as well as other tasks. However, these macrophages are not all the same, but rather a collection of cells that share a common set of functions and characteristics. In the next section, we will discuss the relationship between osteoclasts and subgroups of macrophages, mainly tissue macrophages.

Osteal Macrophages and Osteoclasts

Osteal macrophages, a subgroup of bone-resident macrophages, are found right next to osteoblasts, where they govern bone production and play a variety of roles in the homeostasis of the skeleton. It is known that osteal macrophages can support the function of osteoblasts and promote bone anabolism, but the relationship between osteal macrophages and osteoclasts is still unclear. Myeloid progenitor cells give rise to osteoclasts and osteal macrophages, yet research findings have revealed that osteoclast formation is the more robust or preferable access for myeloid lineage differentiation. Although osteal macrophages can become osteoclast under the stimulation of RANKL and M-CSF, monocytes and other myeloid progenitors have been discovered to be more effective OCPs. In addition, osteoclasts and osteal macrophages possess unique membrane characteristics that distinguish them from one another. Osteal macrophages are independent of osteoclasts, having F4/80 positivity but TRAP negativity. As reported in recent studies, osteal macrophages were shown to exhibit both typical membrane antigens of macrophage-like CD68 and more specialized antigens, like Mac-3 and CD169. These findings showed that osteal macrophages are a malleable, yet distinctive cell type with specialized roles in the microenvironment of the bone marrow. However, osteal macrophages can indeed influence osteoclasts. A recent study found that osteal macrophages perform a unique part in promoting osteoclast activity, as well as the first proof of their participation in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Additionally, osteal macrophages are involved in the effect of PTH on osteoclasts. When stimulated by local stimuli, osteal macrophages tend to release pro- and anti-osteoclastogenic factors, such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1, or IFN-β, regulating osteoclast production and activity. In general, the relationship between osteal macrophages and osteoclasts needs further exploration.

Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Osteoclasts

The term “tumor-associated macrophages” (TAMs) refers to macrophages that have been attracted from circulating monocytes to tumors and have been impacted by the presence of cancer to facilitate tumor aggressiveness and development. TAMs are made up of M2 cells and a few M1 cells. Research has proven that the recruited monocytes in tumor sites are capable of being differentiated into TAMs and osteoclasts. Although TAMs and osteoclasts have a similar precursor, however, bisphosphonates have been demonstrated to precisely target TAMs. Notably, TAMs are also a source of osteoclasts. According to previous studies, when exposed to cancer cells, 1,25-(OH)2D3, and M-CSF or to M-CSF and RANKL, TAMs have been reported to transform into functional bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Moreover, under different polarization states, TAMs can release numerous cytokines, like IL-10, IL-12, which regulate osteoclast generation and function. In some tumor metastasis, TAMs and osteoclasts have similar roles. Overall, the mechanisms regarding the interaction between TAMs and osteoclasts remain unclear and this area needs to be further explored. CD4- macrophages have a positive effect on osteoclast differentiation.

Synovial Macrophages and Osteoclasts

Specialized lining cells of the synovial intima, as well as macrophages found in the synovial subintima and synovial fluid, represent synovial macrophages. Similar to monocyte macrophages in other organs, they are produced from a common bone marrow progenitor and show some functional and biological properties. The most distinguishing characteristic of these cells is their proclivity for phagocytosis. However, they also perform a variety of other functions, including the initiation and modulation of hormones and cellular immunity, as well as the generation and discharge of a great number of secretory substances. A study has proven that synovial macrophages can develop into mature osteoclasts with lacunar resorption capabilities, but this process requires TNF-α/IL-1 or M-CSF along with RANKL. Because inflammatory synovial fluids have an increased number of macrophages and higher concentrations of RANKL, TNF-α, and IL-1, synovial macrophages in rheumatoid or crystal arthritis have a stronger potential to generate osteoclasts. Furthermore, a study has shown that OCPs in the synovium are monocytes/macrophages that express the CD14 antigen. In RA and inflammatory OA, CD14- macrophages have a positive effect on osteoclast differentiation of CD14+ macrophages. Overall, the exploration of the relationship between synovial macrophages and osteoclasts will help researchers better understand the therapy and pathogenesis of diseases, such as OA and RA.

Other Macrophage Subgroups and Osteoclasts

In addition to traditionally activated M1 macrophages, researchers recently found that human atherosclerotic plaques contain macrophages that express the mannose receptor (MR), an alternative macrophage identifier, implying that plaque macrophage populations are heterogeneous. This specific type of M2 macrophage, being positive for both CD68 and MRs, can develop into osteoclast-like cells (OLCs) and have a poor display of RANKL-stimulated osteoclastic bone resorption. Osteoclasts and microglia are separate tissue-resident macrophages found in the bone and brain where they cause pathological alterations of osteoporosis and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), respectively. Both of them share critical signaling pathways, including three receptor signaling pathways, namely: TREM2/DAP12, M-CSF, and CCR5, which converge to control actin-microtubule dynamics and cytoskeleton architecture via the Pyk2 signaling pathway. Research has shown that AD patients are more prone to develop osteoporosis than the general population. Alveolar macrophages and osteoclasts have certain similarities, and therefore bisphosphonates can inhibit both cell types. A study has further shown that alendronate suppresses macrophage migratory and phagocytotic functions, as well as the inflammatory sensitivity of alveolar macrophages by blocking NF-κB signaling pathway. Albeit, alendronate inhalation ameliorates elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema by inducing apoptosis of alveolar macrophages. In addition, a case has been reported in which alveolar macrophages can be transformed into osteoclasts. In addition to the above cells, epithelioid and foam cells also exhibit certain associations with osteoclasts.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Macrophages and osteoclasts have always been a hot and difficult area of research in osteoimmunity. Previous studies tended to focus on a certain type of cell and seldom summarize the latest updates on the interconnection between these two myeloid origin cells for the field of osteoimmunology. However, in this paper, we have outlined present knowledge on the relationships between macrophages and osteoclasts, including their common origin, regulation during polarization, and subgroups’ interactions. Be that as it may, the study of these two cellular associations still has many aspects that need to be further explored, and perplexing difficulties still remain. Notably, current studies tend to focus on the unidirectional effect of macrophages on osteoclasts during polarization at the expense of the effect of osteoclasts on macrophages. Actually, osteoclasts can be involved in the production of various cytokines, which act on macrophages. Here, we hypothesize that there are interactions among macrophages, osteoclasts, and osteoblasts to maintain bone homeostasis. Therefore, we believe that the imbalance between these cells in disease states and its specific mechanisms will be a new field for further exploration. Additionally, as a member of the mononuclear macrophage system, osteoclasts are considered as the resident macrophages in bone and play a phagocytic role similar to that of macrophages. The similarities and differences between the two types of cells in performing phagocytosis are also an aspect worth investigating. A recent study reveals that besides apoptosis, RANKL-stimulated osteoclasts have an alternative cell fate in which they undergo fission into daughter cells called osteomorphs, once resorption is complete. Osteoclasts recycle via osteomorphs during RANKL-stimulated bone resorption. As an unexplored therapeutic target, the interaction of osteomorphs with macrophages will also be a new area of research.

The ultimate objective of practically all biomedical exploration is to improve patient outcomes and develop novel medicines, and renewed efforts in osteoimmunity will be important in accomplishing this translational goal. Currently, most therapies for bone-related diseases primarily focus on one specific cell type, but lack definite approaches aiming at the connections among cells in the bone microenvironment. Thus, the pharmaceutical targets in terminating the pathological association of macrophages with osteoclasts in disease states could become a noteworthy concern in the nearest future.

Author Contributions

YS drafted the manuscript. JL and XX assisted in reviewing literature. FG, ZS, and KZ modified the manuscript. YS and TY reviewed and edited the final manuscript. TY revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This article was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31970090).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References 216

  1. 1.

    Clarke B. Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN (2008 ) 3 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S131–9

    Not in our library10.2215/cjn.04151206

  2. 2.

    Feng X McDonald JM. Disorders of Bone Remodeling. Annu Rev Pathol (2011 ) 6:121–45

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130203

  3. 3.

    Khosla S Oursler MJ Monroe DG. Estrogen and the Skeleton. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2012 ) 23(11):576–81

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tem.2012.03.008

  4. 4.

    Mirza F Canalis E. Management of Endocrine Disease: Secondary Osteoporosis: Pathophysiology and Management. Eur J Endocrinol (2015 ) 173(3):R131–51

    Not in our library10.1530/eje-15-0118

  5. 5.

    Sobacchi C Schulz A Coxon FP Villa A Helfrich MH. Osteopetrosis: Genetics, Treatment and New Insights Into Osteoclast Function. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2013 ) 9(9):522–36

    Not in our library10.1038/nrendo.2013.137

  6. 6.

    Davies LC Jenkins SJ Allen JE Taylor PR. Tissue-Resident Macrophages. Nat Immunol (2013 ) 14(10):986–95

    Not in our library10.1038/ni.2705

  7. 7.

    Horwood NJ. Macrophage Polarization and Bone Formation: A Review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol (2016 ) 51(1):79–86

    Not in our library10.1007/s12016-015-8519-2

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    Mantovani A Sica A Sozzani S Allavena P Vecchi A Locati M. The Chemokine System in Diverse Forms of Macrophage Activation and Polarization. Trends Immunol (2004 ) 25(12):677–86

    Not in our library10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015

  10. 10.

    Porta C Riboldi E Ippolito A Sica A. Molecular and Epigenetic Basis of Macrophage Polarized Activation. Semin Immunol (2015 ) 27(4):237–48

    Not in our library10.1016/j.smim.2015.10.003

  11. 11.

    Weisser SB McLarren KW Kuroda E Sly LM. Generation and Characterization of Murine Alternatively Activated Macrophages. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton NJ) (2013 ) 946:225–39

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-62703-128-8_14

  12. 12.

    Walker DG. Spleen Cells Transmit Osteopetrosis in Mice. Science (1975 ) 190(4216):785–7

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1198094

  13. 13.

    Walker DG. Bone Resorption Restored in Osteopetrotic Mice by Transplants of Normal Bone Marrow and Spleen Cells. Science (1975 ) 190(4216):784–5

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1105786

  14. 14.

    Scheven BA Visser JW Nijweide PJ. In Vitro Osteoclast Generation From Different Bone Marrow Fractions, Including a Highly Enriched Haematopoietic Stem Cell Population. Nature (1986 ) 321(6065):79–81

    Not in our library10.1038/321079a0

  15. 15.

    Udagawa N Takahashi N Akatsu T Tanaka H Sasaki T Nishihara T. Origin of Osteoclasts: Mature Monocytes and Macrophages Are Capable of Differentiating Into Osteoclasts Under a Suitable Microenvironment Prepared by Bone Marrow-Derived Stromal Cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci (1990 ) 87(18):7260–4

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.87.18.7260

  16. 16.

    Chang MK Raggatt LJ Alexander KA Kuliwaba JS Fazzalari NL Schroder K. Osteal Tissue Macrophages Are Intercalated Throughout Human and Mouse Bone Lining Tissues and Regulate Osteoblast Function In Vitro and In Vivo. J Immunol (2008 ) 181(2):1232–44

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.181.2.1232

  17. 17.

    Bar-Shavit Z. The Osteoclast: A Multinucleated, Hematopoietic-Origin, Bone-Resorbing Osteoimmune Cell. J Cell Biochem (2007 ) 102(5):1130–9

    Not in our library10.1002/jcb.21553

  18. 18.

    Quinn JM McGee JO Athanasou NA. Human Tumour-Associated Macrophages Differentiate Into Osteoclastic Bone-Resorbing Cells. J Pathol (1998 ) 184(1):31–6

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(199801)184:1<31::aid-path962>3.0.co;2-v

  19. 19.

    Quinn JM Neale S Fujikawa Y McGee JO Athanasou NA. Human Osteoclast Formation From Blood Monocytes, Peritoneal Macrophages, and Bone Marrow Cells. Calcified Tissue Int (1998 ) 62(6):527–31

    Not in our library10.1007/s002239900473

  20. 20.

    Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W Bartocci A Ferrante AW Jr Ahmed-Ansari A Sell KW Pollard JW. Total Absence of Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 in the Macrophage-Deficient Osteopetrotic (Op/Op) Mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1990 ) 87(12):4828–32

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.87.12.4828

  21. 21.

    Yang D Wan Y. Molecular Determinants for the Polarization of Macrophage and Osteoclast. Semin Immunopathol (2019 ) 41(5):551–63

    Not in our library10.1007/s00281-019-00754-3

  22. 22.

    Theill LE Boyle WJ Penninger JM. RANK-L and RANK: T Cells, Bone Loss, and Mammalian Evolution. Annu Rev Immunol (2002 ) 20(1):795–823

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064753

  23. 23.

    Roodman GD. Regulation of Osteoclast Differentiation. Ann NY Acad Sci (2006 ) 1068(1):100–9

    Not in our library10.1196/annals.1346.013

  24. 24.

    Xiao Y Palomero J Grabowska J Wang L de Rink I van Helvert L. Macrophages and Osteoclasts Stem From a Bipotent Progenitor Downstream of a Macrophage/Osteoclast/Dendritic Cell Progenitor. Blood Adv (2017 ) 1(23):1993–2006

    Not in our library10.1182/bloodadvances.2017008540

  25. 25.

    Miyamoto T Ohneda O Arai F Iwamoto K Okada S Takagi K. Bifurcation of Osteoclasts and Dendritic Cells From Common Progenitors. Blood J Am Soc Hematol (2001 ) 98(8):2544–54

    Not in our library10.1182/blood.v98.8.2544

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Adamopoulos IE Sabokbar A Wordsworth BP Carr A Ferguson DJ Athanasou NA. Synovial Fluid Macrophages Are Capable of Osteoclast Formation and Resorption. J Pathol (2006 ) 208(1):35–43

    Not in our library10.1002/path.1891

  28. 28.

    Speziani C Rivollier A Gallois A Coury F Mazzorana M Azocar O. Murine Dendritic Cell Transdifferentiation Into Osteoclasts Is Differentially Regulated by Innate and Adaptive Cytokines. Eur J Immunol (2007 ) 37(3):747–57

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.200636534

  29. 29.
  30. 30.

    Ziegler-Heitbrock L Ancuta P Crowe S Dalod M Grau V Hart DN. Nomenclature of Monocytes and Dendritic Cells in Blood. Blood J Am Soc Hematol (2010 ) 116(16):e74–80

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2010-02-258558

  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    Ravenhill BJ Soday L Houghton J Antrobus R Weekes MP. Comprehensive Cell Surface Proteomics Defines Markers of Classical, Intermediate and Non-Classical Monocytes. Sci Rep (2020 ) 10(1):1–11

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-61356-w

  33. 33.

    Sprangers S Schoenmaker T Cao Y Everts V De Vries TJ. Different Blood-Borne Human Osteoclast Precursors Respond in Distinct Ways to IL-17a. J Cell Physiol (2016 ) 231(6):1249–60

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.25220

  34. 34.

    Wypasek E Padjas A Szymańska M Plens K Siedlar M Undas A. Non-Classical and Intermediate Monocytes in Patients Following Venous Thromboembolism: Links With Inflammation. Adv Clin Exp Med (2019 ) 28(1):51–8

    Not in our library10.17219/acem/76262

  35. 35.

    Rana AK Li Y Dang Q Yang F. Monocytes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Circulating Precursors of Macrophages and Osteoclasts and, Their Heterogeneity and Plasticity Role in RA Pathogenesis. Int Immunopharmacol (2018 ) 65:348–59

    Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2018.10.016

  36. 36.

    Yahara Y Barrientos T Tang YJ Puviindran V Nadesan P Zhang H. Erythromyeloid Progenitors Give Rise to a Population of Osteoclasts That Contribute to Bone Homeostasis and Repair. Nat Cell Biol (2020 ) 22(1):49–59

    Not in our library10.1038/s41556-019-0437-8

  37. 37.

    Jacome-Galarza CE Percin GI Muller JT Mass E Lazarov T Eitler J. Developmental Origin, Functional Maintenance and Genetic Rescue of Osteoclasts. Nature (2019 ) 568(7753):541–5

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1105-7

  38. 38.

    Gordon S. Elie Metchnikoff: Father of Natural Immunity. Eur J Immunol (2008 ) 38(12):3257–64

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.200838855

  39. 39.

    Mosser DM Edwards JP. Exploring the Full Spectrum of Macrophage Activation. Nat Rev Immunol (2008 ) 8(12):958–69

    Not in our library10.1038/nri2448

  40. 40.

    Murray PJ Allen JE Biswas SK Fisher EA Gilroy DW Goerdt S. Macrophage Activation and Polarization: Nomenclature and Experimental Guidelines. Immunity (2014 ) 41(1):14–20

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008

  41. 41.

    Stein M Keshav S Harris N Gordon S. Interleukin 4 Potently Enhances Murine Macrophage Mannose Receptor Activity: A Marker of Alternative Immunologic Macrophage Activation. J Exp Med (1992 ) 176(1):287–92

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.176.1.287

  42. 42.

    Mills CD Kincaid K Alt JM Heilman MJ Hill AM. M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm. J Immunol (2000 ) 164(12):6166–73

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166

  43. 43.

    Mantovani A Sica A Locati M. Macrophage Polarization Comes of Age. Immunity (2005 ) 23(4):344–6

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2005.10.001

  44. 44.

    Martinez FO Gordon S. The M1 and M2 Paradigm of Macrophage Activation: Time for Reassessment. F1000prime Rep (2014 ) 6:13

    Not in our library10.12703/p6-13

  45. 45.

    Liu YC Zou XB Chai YF Yao YM. Macrophage Polarization in Inflammatory Diseases. Int J Biol Sci (2014 ) 10(5):520–9

    Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.8879

  46. 46.

    Sica A Mantovani A. Macrophage Plasticity and Polarization: In Vivo Veritas. J Clin Invest (2012 ) 122(3):787–95

    Not in our library10.1172/jci59643

  47. 47.
  48. 48.
  49. 49.

    Zhou D Huang C Lin Z Zhan S Kong L Fang C. Macrophage Polarization and Function With Emphasis on the Evolving Roles of Coordinated Regulation of Cellular Signaling Pathways. Cell Signalling (2014 ) 26(2):192–7

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.11.004

  50. 50.
  51. 51.

    Mosser DM. The Many Faces of Macrophage Activation. J Leukocyte Biol (2003 ) 73(2):209–12

    Not in our library10.1189/jlb.0602325

  52. 52.

    Guihard P Danger Y Brounais B David E Brion R Delecrin J. Induction of Osteogenesis in Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Activated Monocytes/Macrophages Depends on Oncostatin M Signaling. Stem Cells (Dayton Ohio) (2012 ) 30(4):762–72

    Not in our library10.1002/stem.1040

  53. 53.

    Woo SR Corrales L Gajewski TF. Innate Immune Recognition of Cancer. Annu Rev Immunol (2015 ) 33:445–74

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112043

  54. 54.

    Guo Y Cao W Zhu Y. Immunoregulatory Functions of the IL-12 Family of Cytokines in Antiviral Systems. Viruses (2019 ) 11(9):772

    Not in our library10.3390/v11090772

  55. 55.

    Champagne CM Takebe J Offenbacher S Cooper LF. Macrophage Cell Lines Produce Osteoinductive Signals That Include Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2. Bone (2002 ) 30(1):26–31

    Not in our library10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00638-x

  56. 56.

    Li CJ Xiao Y Yang M Su T Sun X Guo Q. Long Noncoding RNA Bmncr Regulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate During Skeletal Aging. J Clin Invest (2018 ) 128(12):5251–66

    Not in our library10.1172/jci99044

  57. 57.

    Assoian RK Fleurdelys BE Stevenson HC Miller PJ Madtes DK Raines EW. Expression and Secretion of Type Beta Transforming Growth Factor by Activated Human Macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1987 ) 84(17):6020–4

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.84.17.6020

  58. 58.

    Takahashi F Takahashi K Shimizu K Cui R Tada N Takahashi H. Osteopontin Is Strongly Expressed by Alveolar Macrophages in the Lungs of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Lung (2004 ) 182(3):173–85

    Not in our library10.1007/s00408-004-0309-1

  59. 59.

    Kreutz M Andreesen R Krause SW Szabo A Ritz E Reichel H. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Production and Vitamin D3 Receptor Expression Are Developmentally Regulated During Differentiation of Human Monocytes Into Macrophages. Blood (1993 ) 82(4):1300–7

    Not in our library10.1182/blood.v82.4.1300.bloodjournal8241300

  60. 60.

    Nakashima T Hayashi M Takayanagi H. New Insights Into Osteoclastogenic Signaling Mechanisms. Trends Endocrinol Metabol: TEM (2012 ) 23(11):582–90

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tem.2012.05.005

  61. 61.

    Takayanagi H. Osteoimmunology: Shared Mechanisms and Crosstalk Between the Immune and Bone Systems. Nat Rev Immunol (2007 ) 7(4):292–304

    Not in our library10.1038/nri2062

  62. 62.

    Trouillet-Assant S Gallet M Nauroy P Rasigade JP Flammier S Parroche P. Dual Impact of Live Staphylococcus Aureus on the Osteoclast Lineage, Leading to Increased Bone Resorption. J Infect Dis (2015 ) 211(4):571–81

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiu386

  63. 63.

    Pape HC Marcucio R Humphrey C Colnot C Knobe M Harvey EJ. Trauma-Induced Inflammation and Fracture Healing. J Orthopaedic Trauma (2010 ) 24(9):522–5

    Not in our library10.1097/bot.0b013e3181ed1361

  64. 64.

    Horwood NJ Elliott J Martin TJ Gillespie MT. Osteotropic Agents Regulate the Expression of Osteoclast Differentiation Factor and Osteoprotegerin in Osteoblastic Stromal Cells. Endocrinology (1998 ) 139(11):4743–6

    Not in our library10.1210/endo.139.11.6433

  65. 65.

    Kobayashi K Takahashi N Jimi E Udagawa N Takami M Kotake S. Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Stimulates Osteoclast Differentiation by a Mechanism Independent of the ODF/RANKL-RANK Interaction. J Exp Med (2000 ) 191(2):275–86

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.191.2.275

  66. 66.

    Zhao Z Hou X Yin X Li Y Duan R Boyce BF. TNF Induction of NF-κb RelB Enhances RANKL-Induced Osteoclastogenesis by Promoting Inflammatory Macrophage Differentiation But Also Limits It Through Suppression of NFATc1 Expression. PloS One (2015 ) 10(8):e0135728

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0135728

  67. 67.

    Kim JH Jin HM Kim K Song I Youn BU Matsuo K. The Mechanism of Osteoclast Differentiation Induced by IL-1. J Immunol (Baltimore Md 1950) (2009 ) 183(3):1862–70

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0803007

  68. 68.

    Jules J Zhang P Ashley JW Wei S Shi Z Liu J. Molecular Basis of Requirement of Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor κb Signaling for Interleukin 1-Mediated Osteoclastogenesis. J Biol Chem (2012 ) 287(19):15728–38

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m111.296228

  69. 69.

    Dinarello CA. The Interleukin-1 Family: 10 Years of Discovery. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol (1994 ) 8(15):1314–25

    Not in our library10.1096/fasebj.8.15.8001745

  70. 70.

    Wei S Kitaura H Zhou P Ross FP Teitelbaum SL. IL-1 Mediates TNF-Induced Osteoclastogenesis. J Clin Invest (2005 ) 115(2):282–90

    Not in our library10.1172/jci23394

  71. 71.

    Chen Z Su L Xu Q Katz J Michalek SM Fan M. IL-1r/TLR2 Through MyD88 Divergently Modulates Osteoclastogenesis Through Regulation of Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells C1 (NFATc1) and B Lymphocyte-Induced Maturation Protein-1 (Blimp1). J Biol Chem (2015 ) 290(50):30163–74

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.663518

  72. 72.

    Lee B Kim TH Jun JB Yoo DH Woo JH Choi SJ. Direct Inhibition of Human RANK+ Osteoclast Precursors Identifies a Homeostatic Function of IL-1beta. J Immunol (Baltimore Md 1950) (2010 ) 185(10):5926–34

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1001591

  73. 73.

    O’Brien CA Nakashima T Takayanagi H. Osteocyte Control of Osteoclastogenesis. Bone (2013 ) 54(2):258–63

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2012.08.121

  74. 74.

    Wu Q Zhou X Huang D Ji Y Kang F. IL-6 Enhances Osteocyte-Mediated Osteoclastogenesis by Promoting JAK2 and RANKL Activity In Vitro. Cell Physiol Biochem Int J Exp Cell Physiol Biochem Pharmacol (2017 ) 41(4):1360–9

    Not in our library10.1159/000465455

  75. 75.

    Devlin RD Reddy SV Savino R Ciliberto G Roodman GD. IL-6 Mediates the Effects of IL-1 or TNF, But Not PTHrP or 1,25(OH)2D3, on Osteoclast-Like Cell Formation in Normal Human Bone Marrow Cultures. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (1998 ) 13(3):393–9

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.393

  76. 76.

    Teng MW Bowman EP McElwee JJ Smyth MJ Casanova JL Cooper AM. IL-12 and IL-23 Cytokines: From Discovery to Targeted Therapies for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Nat Med (2015 ) 21(7):719–29

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.3895

  77. 77.

    Trinchieri G. Interleukin-12 and the Regulation of Innate Resistance and Adaptive Immunity. Nat Rev Immunol (2003 ) 3(2):133–46

    Not in our library10.1038/nri1001

  78. 78.

    Vignali DA Kuchroo VK. IL-12 Family Cytokines: Immunological Playmakers. Nat Immunol (2012 ) 13(8):722–8

    Not in our library10.1038/ni.2366

  79. 79.

    Gao Y Grassi F Ryan MR Terauchi M Page K Yang X. IFN-Gamma Stimulates Osteoclast Formation and Bone Loss In Vivo via Antigen-Driven T Cell Activation. J Clin Invest (2007 ) 117(1):122–32

    Not in our library10.1172/jci30074

  80. 80.

    Xu J Wang Y Li J Zhang X Geng Y Huang Y. IL-12p40 Impairs Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Mediated Bone Regeneration via CD4(+) T Cells. Cell Death Differ (2016 ) 23(12):1941–51

    Not in our library10.1038/cdd.2016.72

  81. 81.

    Kamolmatyakul S Chen W Li YP. Interferon-Gamma Down-Regulates Gene Expression of Cathepsin K in Osteoclasts and Inhibits Osteoclast Formation. J Dental Res (2001 ) 80(1):351–5

    Not in our library10.1177/00220345010800011001

  82. 82.

    Takayanagi H Kim S Taniguchi T. Signaling Crosstalk Between RANKL and Interferons in Osteoclast Differentiation. Arthritis Res (2002 ) 4 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S227–32

    Not in our library10.1186/ar581

  83. 83.

    Takayanagi H Ogasawara K Hida S Chiba T Murata S Sato K. T-Cell-Mediated Regulation of Osteoclastogenesis by Signalling Cross-Talk Between RANKL and IFN-Gamma. Nature (2000 ) 408(6812):600–5

    Not in our library10.1038/35046102

  84. 84.

    Horwood NJ Elliott J Martin TJ Gillespie MT. IL-12 Alone and in Synergy With IL-18 Inhibits Osteoclast Formation In Vitro. J Immunol (Baltimore Md 1950) (2001 ) 166(8):4915–21

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.166.8.4915

  85. 85.

    Nagata N Kitaura H Yoshida N Nakayama K. Inhibition of RANKL-Induced Osteoclast Formation in Mouse Bone Marrow Cells by IL-12: Involvement of IFN-Gamma Possibly Induced From Non-T Cell Population. Bone (2003 ) 33(4):721–32

    Not in our library10.1016/s8756-3282(03)00213-8

  86. 86.

    Shanmugarajan S Kawanabe N Koide M Tsuruga E Arroyo JE Key LL Jr. IL-12 Stimulates the Osteoclast Inhibitory Peptide-1 (OIP-1/Hsca) Gene Expression in CD4+ T Cells. J Cell Biochem (2009 ) 107(1):104–11

    Not in our library10.1002/jcb.22104

  87. 87.

    Amcheslavsky A Bar-Shavit Z. Interleukin (IL)-12 Mediates the Anti-Osteoclastogenic Activity of CpG-Oligodeoxynucleotides. J Cell Physiol (2006 ) 207(1):244–50

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.20563

  88. 88.

    Kitaura H Nagata N Fujimura Y Hotokezaka H Yoshida N Nakayama K. Effect of IL-12 on TNF-Alpha-Mediated Osteoclast Formation in Bone Marrow Cells: Apoptosis Mediated by Fas/Fas Ligand Interaction. J Immunol (Baltimore Md 1950) (2002 ) 169(9):4732–8

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.169.9.4732

  89. 89.

    Ahn HJ Maruo S Tomura M Mu J Hamaoka T Nakanishi K. A Mechanism Underlying Synergy Between IL-12 and IFN-Gamma-Inducing Factor in Enhanced Production of IFN-Gamma. J Immunol (Baltimore Md 1950) (1997 ) 159(5):2125–31.

    Not in our library

  90. 90.

    Micallef MJ Ohtsuki T Kohno K Tanabe F Ushio S Namba M. Interferon-Gamma-Inducing Factor Enhances T Helper 1 Cytokine Production by Stimulated Human T Cells: Synergism With Interleukin-12 for Interferon-Gamma Production. Eur J Immunol (1996 ) 26(7):1647–51

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.1830260736

  91. 91.

    Munder M Mallo M Eichmann K Modolell M. Murine Macrophages Secrete Interferon Gamma Upon Combined Stimulation With Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-18: A Novel Pathway of Autocrine Macrophage Activation. J Exp Med (1998 ) 187(12):2103–8

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.187.12.2103

  92. 92.

    Robinson D Shibuya K Mui A Zonin F Murphy E Sana T. IGIF Does Not Drive Th1 Development But Synergizes With IL-12 for Interferon-Gamma Production and Activates IRAK and NFkappaB. Immunity (1997 ) 7(4):571–81

    Not in our library10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80378-7

  93. 93.

    Iwasaki T Yamashita K Tsujimura T Kashiwamura S Tsutsui H Kaisho T. Interleukin-18 Inhibits Osteolytic Bone Metastasis by Human Lung Cancer Cells Possibly Through Suppression of Osteoclastic Bone-Resorption in Nude Mice. J Immunother (Hagerstown Md 1997) (2002 ) 25 Suppl 1:S52–60

    Not in our library10.1097/00002371-200203001-00008

  94. 94.

    Horwood NJ Udagawa N Elliott J Grail D Okamura H Kurimoto M. Interleukin 18 Inhibits Osteoclast Formation via T Cell Production of Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor. J Clin Invest (1998 ) 101(3):595–603

    Not in our library10.1172/jci1333

  95. 95.

    Kitaura H Fujimura Y Yoshimatsu M Kohara H Morita Y Aonuma T. IL-12- and IL-18-Mediated, Nitric Oxide-Induced Apoptosis in TNF-α-Mediated Osteoclastogenesis of Bone Marrow Cells. Calcified Tissue Int (2011 ) 89(1):65–73

    Not in our library10.1007/s00223-011-9494-0

  96. 96.

    Dai SM Nishioka K Yudoh K. Interleukin (IL) 18 Stimulates Osteoclast Formation Through Synovial T Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Comparison With IL1 Beta and Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha. Ann Rheum Dis (2004 ) 63(11):1379–86

    Not in our library10.1136/ard.2003.018481

  97. 97.

    Chen L Wei XQ Evans B Jiang W Aeschlimann D. IL-23 Promotes Osteoclast Formation by Up-Regulation of Receptor Activator of NF-kappaB (RANK) Expression in Myeloid Precursor Cells. Eur J Immunol (2008 ) 38(10):2845–54

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.200838192

  98. 98.

    Ju JH Cho ML Moon YM Oh HJ Park JS Jhun JY. IL-23 Induces Receptor Activator of NF-kappaB Ligand Expression on CD4+ T Cells and Promotes Osteoclastogenesis in an Autoimmune Arthritis Model. J Immunol (Baltimore Md 1950) (2008 ) 181(2):1507–18

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.181.2.1507

  99. 99.

    Kitami S Tanaka H Kawato T Tanabe N Katono-Tani T Zhang F. IL-17A Suppresses the Expression of Bone Resorption-Related Proteinases and Osteoclast Differentiation via IL-17RA or IL-17RC Receptors in RAW264.7 Cells. Biochimie (2010 ) 92(4):398–404

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biochi.2009.12.011

  100. 100.

    Ha J Choi HS Lee Y Kwon HJ Song YW Kim HH. CXC Chemokine Ligand 2 Induced by Receptor Activator of NF-Kappa B Ligand Enhances Osteoclastogenesis. J Immunol (Baltimore Md 1950) (2010 ) 184(9):4717–24

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0902444

  101. 101.

    Pathak JL Bakker AD Verschueren P Lems WF Luyten FP Klein-Nulend J. CXCL8 and CCL20 Enhance Osteoclastogenesis via Modulation of Cytokine Production by Human Primary Osteoblasts. PloS One (2015 ) 10(6):e0131041

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0131041

  102. 102.

    Kwak HB Ha H Kim HN Lee JH Kim HS Lee S. Reciprocal Cross-Talk Between RANKL and Interferon-Gamma-Inducible Protein 10 Is Responsible for Bone-Erosive Experimental Arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2008 ) 58(5):1332–42

    Not in our library10.1002/art.23372

  103. 103.

    Xuan W Feng X Qian C Peng L Shi Y Xu L. Osteoclast Differentiation Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Chemokine CCL4 Mediates RANKL-Induced Osteoclast Migration and Invasion via PI3K Pathway. Cell Biochem Funct (2017 ) 35(3):171–7

    Not in our library10.1002/cbf.3260

  104. 104.

    Kalyanaraman H Ramdani G Joshua J Schall N Boss GR Cory E. A Novel, Direct NO Donor Regulates Osteoblast and Osteoclast Functions and Increases Bone Mass in Ovariectomized Mice. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (2017 ) 32(1):46–59

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.2909

  105. 105.

    Lee SK Huang H Lee SW Kim KH Kim KK Kim HM. Involvement of iNOS-Dependent NO Production in the Stimulation of Osteoclast Survival by TNF-Alpha. Exp Cell Res (2004 ) 298(2):359–68

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.04.039

  106. 106.

    van’t Hof RJ Macphee J Libouban H Helfrich MH Ralston SH. Regulation of Bone Mass and Bone Turnover by Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase. Endocrinology (2004 ) 145(11):5068–74

    Not in our library10.1210/en.2004-0205

  107. 107.

    Bax BE Alam AS Banerji B Bax CM Bevis PJ Stevens CR. Stimulation of Osteoclastic Bone Resorption by Hydrogen Peroxide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1992 ) 183(3):1153–8

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-291x(05)80311-0

  108. 108.

    Lee NK Choi YG Baik JY Han SY Jeong DW Bae YS. A Crucial Role for Reactive Oxygen Species in RANKL-Induced Osteoclast Differentiation. Blood (2005 ) 106(3):852–9

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2004-09-3662

  109. 109.

    Callaway DA Jiang JX. Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Stress in Osteoclastogenesis, Skeletal Aging and Bone Diseases. J Bone Mineral Metab (2015 ) 33(4):359–70

    Not in our library10.1007/s00774-015-0656-4

  110. 110.
  111. 111.

    Park CK Lee Y Kim KH Lee ZH Joo M Kim HH. Nrf2 Is a Novel Regulator of Bone Acquisition. Bone (2014 ) 63:36–46

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2014.01.025

  112. 112.

    An Y Zhang H Wang C Jiao F Xu H Wang X. Activation of ROS/MAPKs/NF-κb/NLRP3 and Inhibition of Efferocytosis in Osteoclast-Mediated Diabetic Osteoporosis. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol (2019 ) 33(11):12515–27

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.201802805rr

  113. 113.

    Hofbauer L Lacey D Dunstan C Spelsberg T Riggs B Khosla S. Interleukin-1β and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, But Not Interleukin-6, Stimulate Osteoprotegerin Ligand Gene Expression in Human Osteoblastic Cells. Bone (1999 ) 25(3):255–9

    Not in our library10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00162-3

  114. 114.

    Rose-John S. Interleukin-6 Family Cytokines. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol (2018 ) 10(2):a028415

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a028415

  115. 115.

    Tanaka T Narazaki M Kishimoto T. IL-6 in Inflammation, Immunity, and Disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol (2014 ) 6(10):a016295

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a016295

  116. 116.

    Deng Z Zhang R Li M Wang S Fu G Jin J. STAT3/IL-6 Dependent Induction of Inflammatory Response in Osteoblast and Osteoclast Formation in Nanoscale Wear Particle-Induced Aseptic Prosthesis Loosening. Biomater Sci (2021 ) 9(4):1291–300

    Not in our library10.1039/d0bm01256d

  117. 117.

    Udagawa N Takahashi N Katagiri T Tamura T Wada S Findlay DM. Interleukin (IL)-6 Induction of Osteoclast Differentiation Depends on IL-6 Receptors Expressed on Osteoblastic Cells But Not on Osteoclast Progenitors. J Exp Med (1995 ) 182(5):1461–8

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.182.5.1461

  118. 118.

    Akbari M Hassan-Zadeh V. IL-6 Signalling Pathways and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes. Inflammopharmacology (2018 ) 26(3):685–98

    Not in our library10.1007/s10787-018-0458-0

  119. 119.

    Gowen M Wood DD Ihrie EJ McGuire MK Russell RG. An Interleukin 1 Like Factor Stimulates Bone Resorption In Vitro. Nature (1983 ) 306(5941):378–80

    Not in our library10.1038/306378a0

  120. 120.

    Dunne A O’Neill LA. The Interleukin-1 Receptor/Toll-Like Receptor Superfamily: Signal Transduction During Inflammation and Host Defense. Sci STKE Signal Transduct Knowledge Environ (2003 ) 2003(171):re3

    Not in our library10.1126/stke.2003.171.re3

  121. 121.

    Jimi E Nakamura I Ikebe T Akiyama S Takahashi N Suda T. Activation of NF-KappaB Is Involved in the Survival of Osteoclasts Promoted by Interleukin-1. J Biol Chem (1998 ) 273(15):8799–805

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.273.15.8799

  122. 122.

    Adamopoulos IE Tessmer M Chao CC Adda S Gorman D Petro M. IL-23 Is Critical for Induction of Arthritis, Osteoclast Formation, and Maintenance of Bone Mass. J Immunol (2011 ) 187(2):951–9

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1003986

  123. 123.

    Bigarella CL Liang R Ghaffari S. Stem Cells and the Impact of ROS Signaling. Development (2014 ) 141(22):4206–18

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.107086

  124. 124.

    Stolina M Dwyer D Niu QT Villasenor KS Kurimoto P Grisanti M. Temporal Changes in Systemic and Local Expression of Bone Turnover Markers During Six Months of Sclerostin Antibody Administration to Ovariectomized Rats. Bone (2014 ) 67:305–13

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.031

  125. 125.

    Darden AG Ries WL Wolf WC Rodriguiz RM Key LL Jr. Osteoclastic Superoxide Production and Bone Resorption: Stimulation and Inhibition by Modulators of NADPH Oxidase. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (1996 ) 11(5):671–5

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.5650110515

  126. 126.

    Garrett IR Boyce BF Oreffo RO Bonewald L Poser J Mundy GR. Oxygen-Derived Free Radicals Stimulate Osteoclastic Bone Resorption in Rodent Bone In Vitro and In Vivo. J Clin Invest (1990 ) 85(3):632–9

    Not in our library10.1172/jci114485

  127. 127.

    Steinbeck MJ Appel WH Jr Verhoeven AJ Karnovsky MJ. NADPH-Oxidase Expression and In Situ Production of Superoxide by Osteoclasts Actively Resorbing Bone. J Cell Biol (1994 ) 126(3):765–72

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.126.3.765

  128. 128.

    Palmer RM Ferrige AG Moncada S. Nitric Oxide Release Accounts for the Biological Activity of Endothelium-Derived Relaxing Factor. Nature (1987 ) 327(6122):524–6

    Not in our library10.1038/327524a0

  129. 129.

    Moncada S Higgs A. The L-Arginine-Nitric Oxide Pathway. N Engl J Med (1993 ) 329(27):2002–12

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm199312303292706

  130. 130.

    Ignarro LJ. Nitric Oxide: Biology and Pathobiology. Los Angeles, California: Academic press (2000 ).

    Not in our library

  131. 131.

    Williams DLH. A Chemist’s View of the Nitric Oxide Story. Organic Biomol Chem (2003 ) 1(3):441–9

    Not in our library10.1039/b209748f

  132. 132.

    Jung JY Lin AC Ramos LM Faddis BT Chole RA. Nitric Oxide Synthase I Mediates Osteoclast Activity In Vitro and In Vivo. J Cell Biochem (2003 ) 89(3):613–21

    Not in our library10.1002/jcb.10527

  133. 133.

    Zheng H Yu X Collin-Osdoby P Osdoby P. RANKL Stimulates Inducible Nitric-Oxide Synthase Expression and Nitric Oxide Production in Developing Osteoclasts. An Autocrine Negative Feedback Mechanism Triggered by RANKL-Induced Interferon-Beta via NF-KappaB That Restrains Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Resorption. J Biol Chem (2006 ) 281(23):15809–20

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m513225200

  134. 134.

    Brandi ML Hukkanen M Umeda T Moradi-Bidhendi N Bianchi S Gross SS. Bidirectional Regulation of Osteoclast Function by Nitric Oxide Synthase Isoforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1995 ) 92(7):2954–8

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.92.7.2954

  135. 135.

    Löwik CW Nibbering PH van de Ruit M Papapoulos SE. Inducible Production of Nitric Oxide in Osteoblast-Like Cells and in Fetal Mouse Bone Explants Is Associated With Suppression of Osteoclastic Bone Resorption. J Clin Invest (1994 ) 93(4):1465–72

    Not in our library10.1172/jci117124

  136. 136.

    Ralston SH Ho LP Helfrich MH Grabowski PS Johnston PW Benjamin N. Nitric Oxide: A Cytokine-Induced Regulator of Bone Resorption. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (1995 ) 10(7):1040–9

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.5650100708

  137. 137.

    Mackay CR. Chemokines: Immunology’s High Impact Factors. Nat Immunol (2001 ) 2(2):95–101

    Not in our library10.1038/84298

  138. 138.

    Lee SH Kim TS Choi Y Lorenzo J. Osteoimmunology: Cytokines and the Skeletal System. BMB Rep (2008 ) 41(7):495–510

    Not in our library10.5483/bmbrep.2008.41.7.495

  139. 139.

    Kuan WP Tam LS Wong CK Ko FW Li T Zhu T. CXCL 9 and CXCL 10 as Sensitive Markers of Disease Activity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol (2010 ) 37(2):257–64

    Not in our library10.3899/jrheum.090769

  140. 140.

    Yu X Huang Y Collin-Osdoby P Osdoby P. Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 (SDF-1) Recruits Osteoclast Precursors by Inducing Chemotaxis, Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) Activity, and Collagen Transmigration. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (2003 ) 18(8):1404–18

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.8.1404

  141. 141.

    Yu X Huang Y Collin-Osdoby P Osdoby P. CCR1 Chemokines Promote the Chemotactic Recruitment, RANKL Development, and Motility of Osteoclasts and Are Induced by Inflammatory Cytokines in Osteoblasts. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (2004 ) 19(12):2065–77

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.040910

  142. 142.

    Tanaka K Yamagata K Kubo S Nakayamada S Sakata K Matsui T. Glycolaldehyde-Modified Advanced Glycation End-Products Inhibit Differentiation of Human Monocytes Into Osteoclasts via Upregulation of IL-10. Bone (2019 ) 128:115034

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2019.115034

  143. 143.

    Xu H Zhao H Lu C Qiu Q Wang G Huang J. Triptolide Inhibits Osteoclast Differentiation and Bone Resorption In Vitro via Enhancing the Production of IL-10 and TGF-β1 by Regulatory T Cells. Mediators Inflamm (2016 ) 2016:8048170

    Not in our library10.1155/2016/8048170

  144. 144.
  145. 145.

    Liu D Yao S Wise GE. Effect of Interleukin-10 on Gene Expression of Osteoclastogenic Regulatory Molecules in the Rat Dental Follicle. Eur J Oral Sci (2006 ) 114(1):42–9

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00283.x

  146. 146.

    Houri-Haddad Y Soskolne WA Halabi A Shapira L. IL-10 Gene Transfer Attenuates P. Gingivalis-Induced Inflammation. J Dental Res (2007 ) 86(6):560–4

    Not in our library10.1177/154405910708600614

  147. 147.

    Pestka S Krause CD Sarkar D Walter MR Shi Y Fisher PB. Interleukin-10 and Related Cytokines and Receptors. Annu Rev Immunol (2004 ) 22:929–79

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104622

  148. 148.

    Rutz S Wang X Ouyang W. The IL-20 Subfamily of Cytokines–From Host Defence to Tissue Homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol (2014 ) 14(12):783–95

    Not in our library10.1038/nri3766

  149. 149.

    Fiorentino DF Bond MW Mosmann TR. Two Types of Mouse T Helper Cell. IV. Th2 Clones Secrete a Factor That Inhibits Cytokine Production by Th1 Clones. J Exp Med (1989 ) 170(6):2081–95

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.170.6.2081

  150. 150.

    Moore KW de Waal Malefyt R Coffman RL O’Garra A. Interleukin-10 and the Interleukin-10 Receptor. Annu Rev Immunol (2001 ) 19:683–765

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683

  151. 151.
  152. 152.

    Tokunaga T Mokuda S Kohno H Yukawa K Kuranobu T Oi K. Tgfβ1 Regulates Human RANKL-Induced Osteoclastogenesis via Suppression of NFATc1 Expression. Int J Mol Sci (2020 ) 21(3):800

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms21030800

  153. 153.

    Icer MA Gezmen-Karadag M. The Multiple Functions and Mechanisms of Osteopontin. Clin Biochem (2018 ) 59:17–24

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.07.003

  154. 154.

    Franzén A Hultenby K Reinholt FP Onnerfjord P Heinegård D. Altered Osteoclast Development and Function in Osteopontin Deficient Mice. J Orthopaedic Res Off Publ Orthopaedic Res Soc (2008 ) 26(5):721–8

    Not in our library10.1002/jor.20544

  155. 155.

    Qian J Xu L Sun X Wang Y Xuan W Zhang Q. Adiponectin Aggravates Bone Erosion by Promoting Osteopontin Production in Synovial Tissue of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther (2018 ) 20(1):26

    Not in our library10.1186/s13075-018-1526-y

  156. 156.

    Reinholt FP Hultenby K Oldberg A Heinegård D. Osteopontin–a Possible Anchor of Osteoclasts to Bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1990 ) 87(12):4473–5

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.87.12.4473

  157. 157.

    Ross FP Chappel J Alvarez JI Sander D Butler WT Farach-Carson MC. Interactions Between the Bone Matrix Proteins Osteopontin and Bone Sialoprotein and the Osteoclast Integrin Alpha V Beta 3 Potentiate Bone Resorption. J Biol Chem (1993 ) 268(13):9901–7

    Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(18)98430-9

  158. 158.

    Liu H Cui J Feng W Lv S Du J Sun J. Local Administration of Calcitriol Positively Influences Bone Remodeling and Maturation During Restoration of Mandibular Bone Defects in Rats. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl (2015 ) 49:14–24

    Not in our library10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.064

  159. 159.

    Lu CL Shyu JF Wu CC Hung CF Liao MT Liu WC. Association of Anabolic Effect of Calcitriol With Osteoclast-Derived Wnt 10b Secretion. Nutrients (2018 ) 10(9):1164

    Not in our library10.3390/nu10091164

  160. 160.

    Georgy SR Pagel CN Ghasem-Zadeh A Zebaze RM Pike RN Sims NA. Proteinase-Activated Receptor-2 Is Required for Normal Osteoblast and Osteoclast Differentiation During Skeletal Growth and Repair. Bone (2012 ) 50(3):704–12

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2011.11.023

  161. 161.

    Li A Cong Q Xia X Leong WF Yeh J Miao D. Pharmacologic Calcitriol Inhibits Osteoclast Lineage Commitment via the BMP-Smad1 and Iκb-NF-κb Pathways. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (2017 ) 32(7):1406–20

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.3146

  162. 162.

    Bi CS Li X Qu HL Sun LJ An Y Hong YL. Calcitriol Inhibits Osteoclastogenesis in an Inflammatory Environment by Changing the Proportion and Function of T Helper Cell Subsets (Th2/Th17). Cell Proliferation (2020 ) 53(6):e12827

    Not in our library10.1111/cpr.12827

  163. 163.

    Key L Carnes D Cole S Holtrop M Bar-Shavit Z Shapiro F. Treatment of Congenital Osteopetrosis With High-Dose Calcitriol. N Engl J Med (1984 ) 310(7):409–15

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm198402163100701

  164. 164.

    Bouillon R Carmeliet G Verlinden L van Etten E Verstuyf A Luderer HF. Vitamin D and Human Health: Lessons From Vitamin D Receptor Null Mice. Endocr Rev (2008 ) 29(6):726–76

    Not in our library10.1210/er.2008-0004

  165. 165.

    Willems HME van den Heuvel E Schoemaker RJW Klein-Nulend J Bakker AD. Diet and Exercise: A Match Made in Bone. Curr Osteoporosis Rep (2017 ) 15(6):555–63

    Not in our library10.1007/s11914-017-0406-8

  166. 166.

    Ouyang W Rutz S Crellin NK Valdez PA Hymowitz SG. Regulation and Functions of the IL-10 Family of Cytokines in Inflammation and Disease. Annu Rev Immunol (2011 ) 29:71–109

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101312

  167. 167.

    Abe E Yamamoto M Taguchi Y Lecka-Czernik B O’Brien CA Economides AN. Essential Requirement of BMPs-2/4 for Both Osteoblast and Osteoclast Formation in Murine Bone Marrow Cultures From Adult Mice: Antagonism by Noggin. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (2000 ) 15(4):663–73

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.663

  168. 168.

    Ghosh-Choudhury N Singha PK Woodruff K St Clair P Bsoul S Werner SL. Concerted Action of Smad and CREB-Binding Protein Regulates Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-Stimulated Osteoblastic Colony-Stimulating Factor-1 Expression. J Biol Chem (2006 ) 281(29):20160–70

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m511071200

  169. 169.

    Itoh K Udagawa N Katagiri T Iemura S Ueno N Yasuda H. Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Stimulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Survival Supported by Receptor Activator of Nuclear factor-kappaB Ligand. Endocrinology (2001 ) 142(8):3656–62

    Not in our library10.1210/endo.142.8.8300

  170. 170.

    Mandal CC Ghosh Choudhury G Ghosh-Choudhury N. Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase/Akt Signal Relay Cooperates With Smad in Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-Induced Colony Stimulating Factor-1 (CSF-1) Expression and Osteoclast Differentiation. Endocrinology (2009 ) 150(11):4989–98

    Not in our library10.1210/en.2009-0026

  171. 171.

    Manolagas SC Jilka RL. Bone Marrow, Cytokines, and Bone Remodeling. Emerging Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med (1995 ) 332(5):305–11

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm199502023320506

  172. 172.

    Ghosh-Choudhury N Abboud SL Nishimura R Celeste A Mahimainathan L Choudhury GG. Requirement of BMP-2-Induced Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and Akt Serine/Threonine Kinase in Osteoblast Differentiation and Smad-Dependent BMP-2 Gene Transcription. J Biol Chem (2002 ) 277(36):33361–8

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m205053200

  173. 173.

    Mandal CC Das F Ganapathy S Harris SE Choudhury GG Ghosh-Choudhury N. Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2) Activates NFATc1 Transcription Factor via an Autoregulatory Loop Involving Smad/Akt/Ca2+ Signaling. J Biol Chem (2016 ) 291(3):1148–61

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.668939

  174. 174.

    Lee HL Bae OY Baek KH Kwon A Hwang HR Qadir AS. High Extracellular Calcium-Induced NFATc3 Regulates the Expression of Receptor Activator of NF-κb Ligand in Osteoblasts. Bone (2011 ) 49(2):242–9

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2011.04.006

  175. 175.

    Takayanagi H. The Role of NFAT in Osteoclast Formation. Ann NY Acad Sci (2007 ) 1116:227–37

    Not in our library10.1196/annals.1402.071

  176. 176.

    Takayanagi H Kim S Koga T Nishina H Isshiki M Yoshida H. Induction and Activation of the Transcription Factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) Integrate RANKL Signaling in Terminal Differentiation of Osteoclasts. Dev Cell (2002 ) 3(6):889–901

    Not in our library10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00369-6

  177. 177.

    Park JH Lee NK Lee SY. Current Understanding of RANK Signaling in Osteoclast Differentiation and Maturation. Mol Cells (2017 ) 40(10):706–13

    Not in our library10.14348/molcells.2017.0225

  178. 178.

    Okamoto K Takayanagi H. Regulation of Bone by the Adaptive Immune System in Arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther (2011 ) 13(3):219

    Not in our library10.1186/ar3323

  179. 179.

    Mathieu C Adorini L. The Coming of Age of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) Analogs as Immunomodulatory Agents. Trends Mol Med (2002 ) 8(4):174–9

    Not in our library10.1016/s1471-4914(02)02294-3

  180. 180.

    Gentek R Molawi K Sieweke MH. Tissue Macrophage Identity and Self-Renewal. Immunol Rev (2014 ) 262(1):56–73

    Not in our library10.1111/imr.12224

  181. 181.
  182. 182.

    Sinder BP Pettit AR McCauley LK. Macrophages: Their Emerging Roles in Bone. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (2015 ) 30(12):2140–9

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.2735

  183. 183.

    Chen K Jiao Y Liu L Huang M He C He W. Communications Between Bone Marrow Macrophages and Bone Cells in Bone Remodeling. Front Cell Dev Biol (2020 ) 8:598263

    Not in our library10.3389/fcell.2020.598263

  184. 184.

    Cho SW Soki FN Koh AJ Eber MR Entezami P Park SI. Osteal Macrophages Support Physiologic Skeletal Remodeling and Anabolic Actions of Parathyroid Hormone in Bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2014 ) 111(4):1545–50

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1315153111

  185. 185.

    Lo CH Lynch CC. Multifaceted Roles for Macrophages in Prostate Cancer Skeletal Metastasis. Front Endocrinol (2018 ) 9:247

    Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2018.00247

  186. 186.

    Batoon L Millard SM Wullschleger ME Preda C Wu AC Kaur S. CD169(+) Macrophages Are Critical for Osteoblast Maintenance and Promote Intramembranous and Endochondral Ossification During Bone Repair. Biomaterials (2019 ) 196:51–66

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.033

  187. 187.

    Pettit AR Chang MK Hume DA Raggatt LJ. Osteal Macrophages: A New Twist on Coupling During Bone Dynamics. Bone (2008 ) 43(6):976–82

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2008.08.128

  188. 188.

    Batoon L Millard SM Raggatt LJ Wu AC Kaur S Sun LWH. Osteal Macrophages Support Osteoclast-Mediated Resorption and Contribute to Bone Pathology in a Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Mouse Model. J Bone Mineral Res Off J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res (2021 ) 36(11):2214–28

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.4413

  189. 189.

    Stacey KJ Sweet MJ Hume DA. Macrophages Ingest and Are Activated by Bacterial DNA. J Immunol (1996 ) 157(5):2116–22.

    Not in our library

  190. 190.

    Itoh K Udagawa N Kobayashi K Suda K Li X Takami M. Lipopolysaccharide Promotes the Survival of Osteoclasts via Toll-Like Receptor 4, But Cytokine Production of Osteoclasts in Response to Lipopolysaccharide Is Different From That of Macrophages. J Immunol (2003 ) 170(7):3688–95

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3688

  191. 191.

    Jimi E Nakamura I Duong LT Ikebe T Takahashi N Rodan GA. Interleukin 1 Induces Multinucleation and Bone-Resorbing Activity of Osteoclasts in the Absence of Osteoblasts/Stromal Cells. Exp Cell Res (1999 ) 247(1):84–93

    Not in our library10.1006/excr.1998.4320

  192. 192.

    Takayanagi H Kim S Matsuo K Suzuki H Suzuki T Sato K. RANKL Maintains Bone Homeostasis Through C-Fos-Dependent Induction of Interferon-Beta. Nature (2002 ) 416(6882):744–9

    Not in our library10.1038/416744a

  193. 193.

    van Holten J Smeets TJ Blankert P Tak PP. Expression of Interferon Beta in Synovial Tissue From Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Comparison With Patients With Osteoarthritis and Reactive Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2005 ) 64(12):1780–2

    Not in our library10.1136/ard.2005.040477

  194. 194.

    Cassetta L Pollard JW. Tumor-Associated Macrophages. Curr Biol CB (2020 ) 30(6):R246–8

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.031

  195. 195.
  196. 196.

    Mizutani K Sud S McGregor NA Martinovski G Rice BT Craig MJ. The Chemokine CCL2 Increases Prostate Tumor Growth and Bone Metastasis Through Macrophage and Osteoclast Recruitment. Neoplasia (New York NY) (2009 ) 11(11):1235–42

    Not in our library10.1593/neo.09988

  197. 197.

    Moriceau G Ory B Gobin B Verrecchia F Gouin F Blanchard F. Therapeutic Approach of Primary Bone Tumours by Bisphosphonates. Curr Pharm Design (2010 ) 16(27):2981–7

    Not in our library10.2174/138161210793563554

  198. 198.

    Roelofs AJ Thompson K Ebetino FH Rogers MJ Coxon FP. Bisphosphonates: Molecular Mechanisms of Action and Effects on Bone Cells, Monocytes and Macrophages. Curr Pharm Design (2010 ) 16(27):2950–60

    Not in our library10.2174/138161210793563635

  199. 199.

    Yang TT Sabokbar A Gibbons CL Athanasou NA. Human Mesenchymal Tumour-Associated Macrophages Differentiate Into Osteoclastic Bone-Resorbing Cells. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol (2002 ) 84(3):452–6

    Not in our library10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.11945

  200. 200.
  201. 201.

    Perry CJ Muñoz-Rojas AR Meeth KM Kellman LN Amezquita RA Thakral D. Myeloid-Targeted Immunotherapies Act in Synergy to Induce Inflammation and Antitumor Immunity. J Exp Med (2018 ) 215(3):877–93

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20171435

  202. 202.

    Endo-Munoz L Evdokiou A Saunders NA. The Role of Osteoclasts and Tumour-Associated Macrophages in Osteosarcoma Metastasis. Biochim Biophys Acta (2012 ) 1826(2):434–42

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2012.07.003

  203. 203.

    Pang Y Fu Y Li C Wu Z Cao W Hu X. Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticles for Ameliorating Breast Cancer-Associated Osteolysis. Nano Lett (2020 ) 20(2):829–40

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02916

  204. 204.

    Ghadially F. Overview Article: The Articular Territory of the Reticuloendothelial System. Ultrastructural Pathol (1980 ) 1(2):249–64

    Not in our library10.3109/01913128009141422

  205. 205.

    Athanasou N. Synovial Macrophages. Ann Rheum Dis (1995 ) 54(5):392

    Not in our library10.1136/ard.54.5.392

  206. 206.

    Danks L Sabokbar A Gundle R Athanasou NA. Synovial Macrophage-Osteoclast Differentiation in Inflammatory Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2002 ) 61(10):916–21

    Not in our library10.1136/ard.61.10.916

  207. 207.

    Bouhlel MA Derudas B Rigamonti E Dièvart R Brozek J Haulon S. PPARgamma Activation Primes Human Monocytes Into Alternative M2 Macrophages With Anti-Inflammatory Properties. Cell Metab (2007 ) 6(2):137–43

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2007.06.010

  208. 208.

    Chinetti-Gbaguidi G Daoudi M Rosa M Vinod M Louvet L Copin C. Human Alternative Macrophages Populate Calcified Areas of Atherosclerotic Lesions and Display Impaired RANKL-Induced Osteoclastic Bone Resorption Activity. Circ Res (2017 ) 121(1):19–30

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.116.310262

  209. 209.

    Zavaczki E Gáll T Zarjou A Hendrik Z Potor L Tóth CZ. Ferryl Hemoglobin Inhibits Osteoclastic Differentiation of Macrophages in Hemorrhaged Atherosclerotic Plaques. Oxid Med Cell Longevity (2020 ) 2020:3721383

    Not in our library10.1155/2020/3721383

  210. 210.

    Lee JW Lee IH Iimura T Kong SW. Two Macrophages, Osteoclasts and Microglia: From Development to Pleiotropy. Bone Res (2021 ) 9(1):11

    Not in our library10.1038/s41413-020-00134-w

  211. 211.

    Ueno M Maeno T Nishimura S Ogata F Masubuchi H Hara K. Alendronate Inhalation Ameliorates Elastase-Induced Pulmonary Emphysema in Mice by Induction of Apoptosis of Alveolar Macrophages. Nat Commun (2015 ) 6:6332

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms7332

  212. 212.

    Tsuji T Nakamura S Komuro I Mikami M Baba M Tanaka M. A Living Case of Pulmonary Ossification Associated With Osteoclast Formation From Alveolar Macrophage in the Presence of T-Cell Cytokines. Internal Med (Tokyo Japan) (2003 ) 42(9):834–8

    Not in our library10.2169/internalmedicine.42.834

  213. 213.

    Barascuk N Skjøt-Arkil H Register TC Larsen L Byrjalsen I Christiansen C. Human Macrophage Foam Cells Degrade Atherosclerotic Plaques Through Cathepsin K Mediated Processes. BMC Cardiovasc Disord (2010 ) 10:19

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2261-10-19

  214. 214.

    Bühling F Reisenauer A Gerber A Krüger S Weber E Brömme D. Cathepsin K–a Marker of Macrophage Differentiation? J Pathol (2001 ) 195(3):375–82

    Not in our library10.1002/path.959

  215. 215.

    Burger EH van der Meer JW van de Gevel JS Gribnau JC Thesingh GW van Furth R. In Vitro Formation of Osteoclasts From Long-Term Cultures of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Phagocytes. J Exp Med (1982 ) 156(6):1604–14

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.156.6.1604

  216. 216.

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.