Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Adrenergic Signaling: A Targetable Checkpoint Limiting Development of the Antitumor Immune Response

Guanxi Qiao, Minhui Chen, Mark J. Bucsek and 2 more

Frontiers in Immunology · 2018 · Review

doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00164

Abstract

An immune response must be tightly controlled so that it will be commensurate with the level of response needed to protect the organism without damaging normal tissue. The roles of cytokines and chemokines in orchestrating these processes are well known, but although stress has long been thought to also affect immune responses, the underlying mechanisms were not as well understood. Recently, the role of nerves and, specifically, the sympathetic nervous system, in regulating immune responses is being revealed. Generally, an acute stress response is beneficial but chronic stress is detrimental because it suppresses the activities of effector immune cells while increasing the activities of immunosuppressive cells. In this review, we first discuss the underlying biology of adrenergic signaling in cells of both the innate and adaptive immune system. We then focus on the effects of chronic adrenergic stress in promoting tumor growth, giving examples of effects on tumor cells and immune cells, explaining the methods commonly used to induce stress in preclinical mouse models. We highlight how this relates to our observations that mandated housing conditions impose baseline chronic stress on mouse models, which is sufficient to cause chronic immunosuppression. This problem is not commonly recognized, but it has been shown to impact conclusions of several studies of mouse physiology and mouse models of disease. Moreover, the fact that preclinical mouse models are chronically immunosuppressed has critical ramifications for analysis of any experiments with an immune component. Our group has found that reducing adrenergic stress by housing mice at thermoneutrality or treating mice housed at cooler temperatures with β-blockers reverses immunosuppression and significantly improves responses to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. These observations are clinically relevant because there are numerous retrospective epidemiological studies concluding that cancer patients who were taking β-blockers have better outcomes. Clinical trials testing whether β-blockers can be repurposed to improve the efficacy of traditional and immunotherapies in patients are on the horizon.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Psychosocial and physical stresses have long been believed to negatively affect health and reduce our resistance to immune-mediated diseases (including cancer), but the mechanisms have been poorly understood. A comprehensive review of early work on the effects of stress on tumor growth in animal models highlights the dichotomous results between viral tumors which grow faster with stress and non-viral/chemically induced tumors which grow more slowly during the stress period. In the last decade or so, however, we are beginning to understand the myriad mechanisms by which chronic adrenergic stress molds the immune response and promotes tumor growth. In this brief review, we will first give examples of how adrenergic signaling impacts immune cells and then how it affects tumor growth. We then summarize how preclinical mouse models are used to study the effects of different stress types on tumor growth, survival, and metastasis, highlighting the idea that tumors attract their own innervation in a process akin to angiogenesis. We emphasize the potential ramifications of the baseline cold stress which is imposed on mice by sub-thermoneutral housing and how this impacts our understanding of the capabilities of the endogenous immune response. In addition, in light of recent excitement about the potential of new immunotherapies to treat cancer, we discuss how adrenergic suppression of the antitumor immune response is a targetable checkpoint which may be blocked to increase the efficacy of immunotherapy. Finally, we summarize retrospective clinical epidemiological studies that support the idea of “repurposing” β-blockers for use in oncology.

Neural Regulation of the Immune Response

Stress can impact the immune response through two major neural pathways, the hypothalamic/pituitary/adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS); we have recently reviewed these pathways in depth. While stimulation of the HPA axis results in the release of glucocorticoids from the adrenal cortex, the SNS innervates the adrenal medulla and stimulates release of the catecholamine neurotransmitters, epinephrine (Epi) and, to a lesser extent, norepinephrine (NE). Perhaps more importantly for the purpose of this review, NE is also released by postganglionic sympathetic neurons which densely innervate both primary and secondary lymphoid organs as well as essentially all other organs. Adrenergic receptors (ARs) for NE and Epi are located on the surface of most cells, including immune cells, and thus in addition to the regulatory influences of chemokines and cytokines, NE released from sympathetic nerve endings also plays a critical role in regulating immune cells. In fact, we are now realizing that neural reflexes may reach immune cells in a fraction of the time (milliseconds) that it takes chemokines and cytokines to circulate and have an effect on these cells. While activation of the SNS in response to acute stress such as exercise or injury promotes a rapid immune response, chronic ongoing stress often is immunosuppressive. As discussed below in the Section “Modeling the Tumor-Promoting Effects of Adrenergic Stress/Signaling in Mice”, suppression of the antitumor immune response is one of the consequences of this chronic stress.

Adrenergic receptors are a class of G protein-coupled receptors and are subdivided into two types (α and β) based on their structure, pharmacology, and signaling mechanisms, and these include several subtypes. Although there are many studies showing that both α- and β-ARs are expressed by innate immune cells, including neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, mature DC, NK cells, and hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors, β2-ARs are the most highly expressed subtype on both innate and adaptive immune cells. T and B cells exclusively express β2-AR; this is also true for hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors. Consequently, β2-ARs are regarded as the main mediators of the immune effects of catecholamines. Activation of these receptors activates adenylate cyclase to increase intracellular cAMP, which in turn activates PKA which ultimately activates downstream transcription factors. The details of this signaling pathway have recently been reviewed for both immune cells and cancer cells.

Adrenergic Regulation of Innate Immunity

That activity of innate immune cells is regulated by activation of ARs has been clearly demonstrated. Adrenergic signaling affects macrophage polarization and cytokine production. β-AR signaling promotes macrophage differentiations toward an M2 phenotype which produces anti-inflammatory cytokines. In one study, gut macrophages in the muscularis mucosa, which are in close proximity to the autonomic myenteric plexus, differentially expressed the β2-AR, which mediated alternative activation of these macrophages, resulting in an M2 anti-inflammatory and tissue-protective profile. Both in vitro and in vivo studies support the conclusion that at least one way in which β-adrenergic signaling can promote breast cancer progression is by polarizing macrophages toward an M2 phenotype. Moreover, in response to LPS stimulation, human monocyte-derived macrophages produce reduced amounts of the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, CCL2, CCL3, and CCL4 and decrease IL-27 secretion in response to acute inflammation while, at the same time, increasing production of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 production. In contrast to the effects of β-AR signaling in macrophage, α-AR signaling promotes secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Adrenergic signaling has been shown to impact DCs by impairing their maturation, cytokine production, and antigen presentation. Studies have shown that β2-AR activation prevents differentiation of monocytes into DCs and enhances production of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-10, and IL-33 while decreasing IL-12 and TNF-α production by inhibition of NF-κB and AP-1. In addition to altering cytokine production, Epi has also been shown to activate β1-AR/arrestin2–PI3K–MMP9/CCR7 signaling to inhibit migration of human DCs which could impair migration to lymph nodes. Pretreating bone marrow derived DCs (BMDC) with β2-AR agonists before adoptive transfer reduces migration and responses to chemokines. Both in vitro and in vivo studies show that α2-AR suppresses DC migration by inhibiting type IV collagenase/gelatinase activity. The primary function of DCs, antigen presentation, is impaired by treating epidermal Langerhans cells with catecholamines, and this effect is blocked by using a β2-AR antagonist. In addition, cross-presentation of proteins by DCs is impaired by activation of β2-AR signaling, which in turn decreases CD8+ T cell proliferation and IL-2 production. Our lab has also found that adrenergic stress impacts the phenotype and function of DCs in ways that could suppress their function.

Several studies have demonstrated that chronic adrenergic signaling can suppress NK cell activity. In a restraint stress mouse model, the number of NK cells is reduced in the intraparenchymal region of the lung and circulation. Another study showed that activation of β-ARs reduces the activity of murine NK cells and leads to an increase in tumor metastasis. Interestingly, the two arms of the stress response can cooperate to regulate immune cells. De Lorenzo et al. found that during sleep deprivation, glucocorticoids increase expression of β2-AR in NK cells resulting in reduction of NK cell numbers and cytotoxicity. In contrast to the effects observed in these models of chronic stress, some studies have concluded that stress can increase NK cell activation and function. In one such study, six episodes of social disruption increased NK cell activity. In addition, voluntary exercise reduces the incidence and growth of breast cancer and this effect is mediated by catecholamine induced plasma IL-6, which in this case mobilizes NK cells. Enriching the housing environment for mice also increases NK antitumor function. Clearly, the effects of stress differ depending on the type and duration.

In addition, there are many reports investigating the regulation of other innate immune cells by adrenergic signaling. For example, a β2-AR agonist was able to prevent eosinophil functions which are induced by exposure to IL-5, LTD4, or IP-10 and which worsen the severity of asthma. In another example, the phagocytic efficiency of wound neutrophils was found to be impaired by a pharmacologic dose of NE, in a standard subcutaneous sponge wound model, and this change was found to be mediated by α- and β-ARs and downstream protein kinase A.

Adrenergic Regulation of Adaptive Immunity

Norepinephrine also activates ARs on lymphocytes to regulate the differentiation, trafficking/migration, and effector functions of all lymphocyte subpopulations. Adrenergic signaling impacts T-cells by directly regulating thymocytes and inhibiting activation, differentiation, and effector function of T-cells directly or indirectly by inhibiting T-cell activating cytokine production by DCs. A study in stressed mice showed that β-AR signaling promotes negative selection in the thymus through the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, resulting in decreased numbers of thymocytes. In addition, exposure to chronic unpredictable stress reduces the number of double negative thymocytes. Adrenergic signaling decreases production of IL-2, IFN-γ, and proliferation of CD4+ T-cell through many mechanisms. β2-AR signaling inhibits cytokines by inhibiting calcineurin in a PKA dependent manner. IFN-γ production by CD4+ T-cells can also be affected indirectly by inhibition of cytokine production by DCs. Adrenergic signaling also regulates Th1 and Th2 differentiation. Naïve CD4+ T-cells or activated Th1 cells express a detectable level of the β2-AR, while Th2 cells do not, due to differences in histone and DNA modifications within the β2-AR proximal promoter. Therefore, Th1 cells can be suppressed by adrenergic signals and β2-AR activation has been found to be involved in directing CD4+ T-cell polarization toward a Th2 phenotype. The impact of β2-AR signaling on CD8+ T-cells depends on the stage of differentiation. Memory and effector CD8+ T-cells have significantly higher expression of β2-ARs than naïve T-cells and β2-AR signaling reduces IL-2 and IFN-γ production by memory CD8+ T-cells upon restimulation. IL-2 increases β2-AR expression on effector CD8+ T-cells; however, β2-AR signaling suppresses IL-2 production by CD8+ T-cells, which forms a negative-feedback loop in regulating CD8+ T-cell activation and function. By contrast, while β2-AR signaling suppresses CD8+ effector T-cell function, β2-AR signaling in regulatory T-cells increases their suppressor activity by increasing expression of the checkpoint molecule CTLA-4 and promotes inducible Tregs by inducing Foxp3 expression in T-cells.

Suppression of immune cells by chronic adrenergic stress has long-term negative implications for disease progression and has been well studied in the context of both infectious diseases and autoimmunity. β2-AR signaling impairs CD8+ T-cell-mediated antiviral responses to influenza in vivo and blocking the β2-AR with Nadolol enabled development of a robust antiviral response. Similarly, β2-AR signaling reduced the CD8+ T-cell response to the vesicular stomatitis virus. Dysregulation of the immune response also underlies many autoimmune diseases. Because autoimmune diseases involve overactive immune responses, adrenergic signaling actually helps to suppress autoimmunity, and ablation of sympathetic nerves worsened disease severity in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. An in depth discussion of these studies is beyond the scope of this review but is the subject of a recent review by our group.

Neural Regulation of Tumor Growth

The early observations of Levi Montalcini and collaborators first clearly demonstrated that tumor cells secrete nerve growth factors and can induce neural outgrowth from both sensory and sympathetic ganglia. As evidence of the tumor promoting effects of adrenergic signaling accumulated, Entschladen and colleagues hypothesized that in a process analogous to angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, tumors might secrete neurotrophic factors to attract their own innervation. But it was the elegant study of Magnon et al. that clearly demonstrated both the ability of a developing tumor to attract autonomic innervation and the critical role such innervation plays in development and progression of a tumor. Using an orthotopic xenograft model (PC-3 prostate cells), they showed that the developing tumor attracted new autonomic innervation and that if they severed the hypogastric nerves or chemically sympathectomized the mice, tumor growth was significantly inhibited. Furthermore, they showed that parasympathetic nerves promoted the later stages of invasion and metastasis. Others have shown that NE levels in tumors are elevated by stress that activates the SNS and that NE is produced locally within tumors (as evidenced by tyrosine hydroxylase positive cells).

In the last decade or so there has been a growing effort to understand how adrenergic signaling promotes tumor growth and we now know that β-AR signaling acts through multiple mechanisms (Figure 1). ARs are expressed by multiple cell types found in the tumor microenvironment and, therefore, the effects of adrenergic signaling that support tumor survival, growth, and metastasis are complex.

Direct effects include promoting tumorigenesis, tumor cell proliferation, antiapoptotic mechanisms, and promoting metastasis by inducing epithelial to mesenchymal transformation (EMT), motility and invasion. β-Adrenergic signaling activates p53 degradation and DNA damage through the β-AR/ARRB1/PKA pathway and activation of oncogenes, such as Src and Her2 and may promote tumorigenesis. In addition, increased psychological stress is associated with decreased telomere length, which is associated with increased cancer risk. Adrenergic signaling promotes tumor cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo, while blocking adrenergic signaling leads to G1/S phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Antiapoptotic mechanisms are upregulated in tumor cells both in vitro and in mouse xenografts. Our lab found that adrenergic signaling increases expression of the antiapoptotic proteins BAD, BCL-2, and MCP-1 in tumors and blocking adrenergic signaling significantly reduces antiapoptotic protein expression and tumor growth. In addition, in vitro, NE activates the TGF-β pathway in treated cancer cells enhancing migration and invasion. Mesenchymal markers such as α-SMA, vimentin, and snail are also increased by β-adrenergic signaling. More recently, analysis of exosomes isolated from ovarian patients with high levels of adrenergic pathway activation (associated with low social support) shows upregulation of mesenchymal-characteristic gene transcripts and downregulation of epithelial-characteristic gene transcripts, and this is mediated by the ADRB/cAMP/PKA pathway. Adrenergic signaling plays a vital role in promoting of metastasis and could directly induce invasive genes such as MMPs by tumor cells and indirectly by causing cancer-associated fibroblasts to produce high levels of collagen and extracellular matrix components, which facilitate tumor invasion and dissemination.

Adrenergic signaling also affects other cells in the tumor microenvironment, which in turn support tumor growth, survival and metastasis. Studies show that adrenergic signaling promotes angiogenesis through increasing VEGF, IL-8, IL-6, PEG2 expression in tumor cells, and decreasing expression of TSP1, a potent angiogenesis inhibitor. A recent study from Zahalka et al. demonstrates that adrenergic signaling also directly alters the metabolism of endothelial cells in the TME, leading to increased angiogenesis. In addition, studies demonstrate that adrenergic signaling promotes lymphangiogenesis by inducing VEGFC production by tumor cells and/or macrophages. Formation of a pre-metastatic niche in the lung is induced by adrenergic signaling in monocyte/macrophage cells in a breast cancer model. In another study, stimulation of bone marrow stromal cells by adrenergic signaling increases breast cancer bone colonization. Finally, it is becoming clear that the immunosuppressive effects of adrenergic signaling that have been seen in infection models are also playing a major role in suppressing the antitumor immune response. This inhibits tumor infiltration and function of cytotoxic T-cells and promotes infiltration of immunosuppressive cells such as MDSC and Tregs.

Modeling the Tumor-Promoting Effects of Adrenergic Stress/Signaling in Mice

Although the concept of stress is generally understood, it is challenging to define. The original concept of stress, as proposed by Selye, was the response of an organism to a stimulus that challenged its well-being and he called this the General Adaptation Syndrome. Briefly, he proposed that an organism had the same response to many different noxious stimuli (swelling of the adrenal cortex, atrophy of the thymus, gastric ulcers) and that people suffering from various diseases had the same symptoms or syndrome. Eventually, he coined the term “stressor” to refer to the stimulus and the “stress response” to refer to the reaction. Stressors can be psychological (such as anxiety, fear, depression), physical (such as injury, surgery), or physiological (environmental factors including temperature) and exposure to stressors can be either acute (a single short-term exposure—minutes to hours) or chronic (long term, ongoing, or repeated). In general, an acute stress such as an injury leads to a beneficial response including activation of immune cells, whereas chronic exposure is most often deleterious and immunosuppressive. Dhabhar has discussed the idea of categorizing stress as “protective, pathological, or regulatory” depending on their effects on overall health.

There is a general view that stress is detrimental to health and in ovarian carcinoma patients with little social support, it has been shown that the stress of social isolation elevates tumor and ascites NE while Epi was undetectable; this elevated NE correlates with more severe disease stages. To study how stress impacts tumor growth in preclinical models, protocols for inducing stress in mice have been developed (Table 1). It is important to point out that the same method can be used to induce both acute and chronic stress and these are distinguished by the duration of exposure. A good example of this is a study that used restraint stress to compare changes in the hippocampal transcriptome following acute vs. chronic stress by looking at samples taken after 1, 8, or 13 days of stress exposure.

To model psychological stress, mice have most often been subjected to social isolation or restraint stress. Over 10 years ago, using a mouse xenograft model of ovarian cancer, Thaker’s group showed that restraint stress resulted in significant elevation of NE (255–358%) and corticosterone (488–789%) in organs adjacent to the peritoneal cavity in tumor-bearing mice. Tumor growth and metastasis were also significantly promoted in these mice. Mice are social animals and are normally housed at four to five per cage; in fact, special permission is needed if mice are going to be housed singly and in that case, enrichment materials are required. In addition to restraint stress, Thaker’s group also subjected mice to social isolation and found enlargement of the adrenal glands as well as confirming the tumor promoting effects of stress. In addition, they showed that these effects could be duplicated by treating mice with the β2-AR agonist terbutaline and that the tumor promoting effects of both restraint and social isolation stress could be blocked by the pan β-AR antagonist propranolol. Altogether, these results clearly defined a role for adrenergic signaling in tumor growth and this was shown to be mediated by tumor VEGF production and increased angiogenesis. Since these seminal studies, the role of adrenergic signaling in tumor progression has been characterized in other models. Other groups have noted increased levels of catecholamines in response to psychosocial stressors. Qin et al. found that Epi was elevated and breast cancer progression was promoted in association with an M2 skewed macrophage population in a social isolation model; however, NE levels were not reported. Partecke et al. found that in response to a combination of acoustic and chronic stress, animals’ measures of behavioral stress as well as levels of stress hormones (steroids and adrenal tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate limiting enzyme in NE synthesis) were significantly elevated and furthermore, that orthotopic, syngeneic pancreatic tumors grew faster in these mice and there were indications that their immune response was suppressed, with a trend toward fewer CD4 and increased intratumoral Tregs present. Treatment of these mice with propranolol reduced tumor growth and improved overall survival (OS). These studies and several others (see Table 1) demonstrate that psychosocial stress promotes tumor growth through various mechanisms and that adrenergic signaling can be blocked by administration of β-AR or specific β2-AR antagonists.

In laboratory studies, the effects of physical/physiological environmental stressors on catecholamine levels and tumor growth have not been as well studied as the effects of psychological stresses, but environmental factors have great capacity to induce a stress response and alter internal metabolism and physiology. Our lab has recently defined a role for chronic mild cold stress in promoting tumor growth. This environmental stressor is universally imposed on mice as a result of mandated, cool ambient housing temperatures, and the impact of this cold stress on the modeling of several non-tumor mouse models of disease has been recently reviewed. The increasing awareness of this problem is reflected in several additional publications over the last 2–3 years reporting on how ambient housing temperatures affect disease outcomes in atherosclerosis, Alzheimer’s, monocyte mobilization into the blood, and obesity. Newer reviews have also drawn attention to this situation. We first reported the unexpected discovery that when mice are housed at thermoneutrality (30°C), tumor growth is significantly inhibited in comparison to mice housed at standard temperatures (22°C) even though mice under both conditions maintain a normal core body temperature of 37°C. We also demonstrated that this difference in tumor growth was dependent on the adaptive immune response which was significantly suppressed when mice were housed at 22°C. Furthermore, we found that although the effects of cold stress are commonly studied by exposing mice to 4°C, just housing mice at the sub-thermoneutral 22°C was sufficient to cause chronic cold stress and significant elevation of both plasma and tumor NE levels. Thus we found that even what was considered mild cold stress at 22°C, is biologically sufficient to induce SNS activation to produce NE and drive non-shivering thermogenesis to maintain a normal body temperature. Furthermore, we have shown that chronic adrenergic signaling in mice housed at 22°C promotes tumor growth in two different ways, both by induction of antiapoptotic signaling molecules and resistance to cytotoxic therapies in tumor cells and by profound immunosuppression of the antitumor immune response which is associated with increases in immunosuppressive cell populations and inhibition of CD8+ T-cell effector phenotypes. Therefore, not only are the tumor cells more resistant to being killed, but the ability of the immune cells to kill tumor cells is much less robust when NE levels are increased by baseline housing stress; both of these situations are reversed by administration of the β-blocker propranolol. Interestingly, the recent studies of Wrobel et al. agree with our findings; this group administered propranolol to MT/Ret mice and found inhibition of tumor development, increased CD8+ T-cells in the tumors, and decreased MDSC. However, these authors did not associate this baseline stress with housing temperature and the temperature at which their mice were housed was not reported.

We are particularly concerned about this immunosuppression by baseline adrenergic stress in experimental mice because both the long-term outcome of traditional therapies and immunotherapies depend on the development of a robust antitumor immune response. We tested whether the efficacy of immunotherapy, specifically checkpoint inhibitor therapies, was limited by adrenergic stress. In mouse models of melanoma and breast cancer, we used three separate approaches: housing mice at 30°C, treating mice housed at 22°C with β-blockers, or testing anti-PD-1 in ADRB2−/− mice at 22°C and asked how this impacted in efficacy of anti-PD-1. In each case, it is clear that adrenergic signaling reduces responses to checkpoint inhibitor therapy and the efficacy is significantly improved by reducing this stress.

Taken together, it is clear that the majority of studies on the effects of stress are performed at 22°C when the “control” mice are already “stressed” in comparison to the relatively reduced levels they would be experiencing at 30°C (Figure 2). Therefore, restraint stress or other forms of psychosocial stress are imposed on already stressed mice, so that measures of tumor growth, response to therapy or the capabilities of the antitumor immune response in the controls are somewhat compromised. In the future, it will be important to determine if, and/or how, baseline cold stress may be affecting the results of these stress experiments. Although due to the thermal comfort requirements of personnel, it seems unlikely that the ambient temperatures in animal facilities will be changed to 30°C, it may be possible to reduce cold stress in experimental animals by providing nesting materials or constructing special cages in which mice can behaviorally regulate their thermal comfort.

Clinical Relevance of Preclinical Findings

How do these findings relate to patients? Studies have demonstrated that several types of patient tumors express ARs including pediatric, pancreatic, lung, melanoma, and prostate cancers. More provocatively, as it became apparent that blockade of adrenergic signaling could inhibit tumor growth in preclinical models, researchers looked for evidence of benefit in patients. Several retrospective epidemiological studies have supported the conclusion that patients who are taking β-AR antagonists (“β-blockers”) and receiving conventional therapies have better outcomes in terms of both progression-free survival and OS than those who are not (Table 2). It should be noted, however, that there are other analyses that failed to identify any benefit of β-blockers. There are several potential reasons for why some studies show that cancer patients benefit from taking β-blockers while other studies conclude there is no benefit. One important reason is that the type of β-blocker being taken by the patient likely influences the patient’s response as well as the overall outcome of the study. There are studies showing that patients taking non-selective β-blockers (blockade of β1 and β2) had improved OS compared with patients taking β1-specific blockers which are the most commonly prescribed β-blockers. The heterogeneity of ARs expressed by the tumors themselves may also account for the different responses in cancer patients. Besides the type of β-blocker, it is possible that the dosage needed to elicit a favorable antitumor effect is higher than the normal prescription dose for treating cardiovascular diseases. In addition, the patient parameters are variable among the studies. Although the most important potential confounders such as sex, stage, treatment were usually adjusted for, there are others, such as socioeconomic status which is proven to be associated with cancer progression, which were not taken into consideration. The timing of β-blocker exposure is different between studies. Some studies recruited patients already taking β-blockers before cancer diagnosis, while some studies investigated patients who began taking β-blockers after cancer diagnosis. In addition, there are limited records showing whether patients complied with the prescriptions. The study design may also influence the result. Some studies used all-cause of mortality as the endpoint, which makes it hard to study the relationship of β-blocker usage and cancer-specific mortality. In other studies, patients taking β-blockers who died within 3 months after cancer diagnosis were still included, which is thought to be too short an interval to assess benefit.

To date, there has been a single report of a prospective study treating melanoma patients with propranolol. In this study, De Giorgi and colleagues offered patients the choice of “off-label” treatment with propranolol and found an 80% risk reduction for recurrence for the 19 of 53 patients who chose to receive it. Ultimately, the ability of β-blockers to support the development of an antitumor immune response and to improve the efficacy of traditional and immunotherapies will have be determined in blinded, prospective clinical trials, but the results of this study in melanoma lend support for the “repurposing” of β-blockers in oncology.

β-Blockers have been used extensively in the clinic to treat patients with hypertension, angina and anxiety. In general, β-blockers have a good toxicity profile and are well tolerated; common side effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, insomnia, weakness and fatigue. However, the safety of using of β-blockers in cancer patients needs to be considered. Although most cancer patients do not have hypertension and/or angina, they do often have increased levels of adrenergic stress and so in that way may be considered to have abnormal adrenergic signaling. In several studies in which cancer patients were taking β-blockers as an off-label treatment, either no drug related adverse effects were recorded or small number of patients had minor side effects which did not require discontinuation. However, an understanding of the comparative safety of β-blockers in combination with other cancer therapies remains to be evaluated in the context of clinical trials.

Conclusion

Recently developed immunotherapies are showing great promise in cancer treatment, yet many tumor types are not responding and even in sensitive tumors such as melanoma and lung cancer, the majority of patients are not benefiting. Therefore, developing new strategies for improving the therapeutic efficacy of cancer immunotherapies is critical. Immunotherapies and traditional therapies that have an immune-mediated component depend on the development of a robust antitumor immune response, but immunosuppressive factors often limit this. Therefore, a promising strategy to improve response to immunotherapy is to develop additional approaches to reverse immunosuppression that can be used in combination therapies.

A newly identified mechanism of immunosuppression is by stress-induced sympathetic adrenergic signaling, which suppresses many aspects of the immune system including development, differentiation, activation, and function of many types of immune cells. Adrenergic signaling has been shown to inhibit immune responses in both autoimmune diseases and infection models. Sympathetic neurons innervate both primary and secondary lymphoid organs supporting the idea that adrenergic signaling can impact immune cells locally. Recently, it has become clear that adrenergic signaling also affects tumor progression. By using mouse models of both psychosocial and physical stress stress-induced adrenergic signaling was found to be tumor-promoting in many types of cancers. The accumulated evidence demonstrates that adrenergic stress regulates tumor growth directly through multiple mechanisms, including development, proliferation, and protection of tumor cells from treatments. Although less well studied, recent findings show that adrenergic signaling also impacts tumor growth indirectly by regulating antitumor immunity. Our lab recently demonstrated that chronic mild cold stress induces SNS activation which promotes tumor growth; blocking this stress by either housing mice at thermoneutral temperature or adding β-blockers slows tumor growth. These effects were found to be meditated by CD8+ T-cells. In addition, combining a pan-β-blocker with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-1) significantly increased the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1. Because cancer patients who were already taking β-blockers were found to have better outcomes in several retrospective studies, the preclinical studies provide a rationale for testing this combination in prospective clinical trials. Finally, accumulating evidence shows that external environmental stressors, i.e., housing temperature, creates a level of baseline adrenergic stress that affects experimental outcomes in mouse models. In the future, when designing and analyzing experiments, it will be important to factor in this potentially confounding experimental variable to better understand the biology underlying the results and to improve rigor and reproducibility.

Author Contributions

GQ, MC, MB, ER, and BH developed the concepts for this review and were involved in identifying the references and writing and editing the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 209

  1. 1.

    Calcagni E Elenkov I. Stress system activity, innate and T helper cytokines, and susceptibility to immune-related diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2006 ) 1069:62–76.

    Not in our library10.1196/annals.1351.006

  2. 2.

    Antoni MH Lutgendorf SK Cole SW Dhabhar FS Sephton SE McDonald PG The influence of bio-behavioural factors on tumour biology: pathways and mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer (2006 ) 6:240–8.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1820

  3. 3.

    Justice A Review of the effects of stress on cancer in laboratory animals: importance of time of stress application and type of tumor. Psychol Bull (1985 ) 98:108–38.

    Not in our library10.1037/0033-2909.98.1.108

  4. 4.

    Padgett DA Glaser R How stress influences the immune response. Trends Immunol (2003 ) 24:444–8.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1471-4906(03)00173-x

  5. 5.

    Glaser R Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health. Nat Rev Immunol (2005 ) 5:243–51.

    Not in our library10.1038/nri1571

  6. 6.

    Elenkov IJ Chrousos GP Stress system – organization, physiology and immunoregulation. Neuroimmunomodulation (2006 ) 13:257–67.

    Not in our library10.1159/000104853

  7. 7.

    Nance DM Sanders VM. Autonomic innervation and regulation of the immune system (1987–2007). Brain Behav Immun (2007 ) 21:736–45.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2007.03.008

  8. 8.

    Marino F Cosentino M. Adrenergic modulation of immune cells: an update. Amino Acids (2013 ) 45:55–71.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00726-011-1186-6

  9. 9.

    Cole SW Sood AK. Molecular pathways: beta-adrenergic signaling in cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2012 ) 18:1201–6.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0641

  10. 10.

    Eng JW Kokolus KM Reed CB Hylander BL Ma WW Repasky EA. A nervous tumor microenvironment: the impact of adrenergic stress on cancer cells, immunosuppression, and immunotherapeutic response. Cancer Immunol Immunother (2014 ) 63:1115–28.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00262-014-1617-9

  11. 11.

    Bellinger DL Lorton D. Autonomic regulation of cellular immune function. Auton Neurosci (2014 ) 182:15–41.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.autneu.2014.01.006

  12. 12.

    Bellinger DL Lorton D Felten SY Felten DL. Innervation of lymphoid organs and implications in development, aging, and autoimmunity. Int J Immunopharmacol (1992 ) 14:329–44.

    Not in our library10.1016/0192-0561(92)90162-e

  13. 13.

    Felten DL Felten SY Bellinger DL Carlson SL Ackerman KD Madden KS Noradrenergic sympathetic neural interactions with the immune system: structure and function. Immunol Rev (1987 ) 100:225–60.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-065x.1987.tb00534.x

  14. 14.

    Felten DL Livnat S Felten SY Carlson SL Bellinger DL Yeh P. Sympathetic innervation of lymph nodes in mice. Brain Res Bull (1984 ) 13:693–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/0361-9230(84)90230-2

  15. 15.

    Felten SY Felten DL Bellinger DL Carlson SL Ackerman KD Madden KS Noradrenergic sympathetic innervation of lymphoid organs. Prog Allergy (1988 ) 43:14–36.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Chavan SS Tracey KJ. Essential neuroscience in immunology. J Immunol (2017 ) 198:3389–97.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1601613

  17. 17.

    Pedersen L Idorn M Olofsson GH Lauenborg B Nookaew I Hansen RH Voluntary running suppresses tumor growth through epinephrine- and IL-6-dependent NK cell mobilization and redistribution. Cell Metab (2016 ) 23:554–62.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.011

  18. 18.

    Dhabhar FS. Effects of stress on immune function: the good, the bad, and the beautiful. Immunol Res (2014 ) 58:193–210.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12026-014-8517-0

  19. 19.

    Hieble JP Bondinell WE Ruffolo RR Jr Alpha- and beta-adrenoceptors: from the gene to the clinic. 1. Molecular biology and adrenoceptor subclassification. J Med Chem (1995 ) 38:3415–44.

    Not in our library10.1021/jm00018a001

  20. 20.

    Scanzano A Schembri L Rasini E Luini A Dallatorre J Legnaro M Adrenergic modulation of migration, CD11b and CD18 expression, ROS and interleukin-8 production by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Inflamm Res (2015 ) 64:127–35.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00011-014-0791-8

  21. 21.
  22. 22.

    Padro CJ Sanders VM. Neuroendocrine regulation of inflammation. Semin Immunol (2014 ) 26:357–68.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.smim.2014.01.003

  23. 23.

    Fragala MS Kraemer WJ Mastro AM Denegar CR Volek JS Hakkinen K Leukocyte beta2-adrenergic receptor expression in response to resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc (2011 ) 43:1422–32.

    Not in our library10.1249/mss.0b013e31820b88bc

  24. 24.

    Grisanti LA Woster AP Dahlman J Sauter ER Combs CK Porter JE alpha1-adrenergic receptors positively regulate toll-like receptor cytokine production from human monocytes and macrophages. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2011 ) 338:648–57.

    Not in our library10.1124/jpet.110.178012

  25. 25.

    Spengler RN Allen RM Remick DG Strieter RM Kunkel SL. Stimulation of alpha-adrenergic receptor augments the production of macrophage-derived tumor necrosis factor. J Immunol (1990 ) 145:1430–4.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Hjemdahl P Larsson K Johansson MC Zetterlund A Eklund A. Beta-adrenoceptors in human alveolar macrophages isolated by elutriation. Br J Clin Pharmacol (1990 ) 30:673–82.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03835.x

  27. 27.

    Maisel AS Harris T Rearden CA Michel MC. Beta-adrenergic receptors in lymphocyte subsets after exercise. Alterations in normal individuals and patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation (1990 ) 82:2003–10.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.cir.82.6.2003

  28. 28.

    Whalen MM Bankhurst AD. Effects of beta-adrenergic receptor activation, cholera toxin and forskolin on human natural killer cell function. Biochem J (1990 ) 272:327–31.

    Not in our library10.1042/bj2720327

  29. 29.

    Xiao J Huang HW Peng YP Bao JY Huang Y Qiu YH. Modulation of natural killer cell function by alpha-adrenoreceptor-coupled signalling. Neuro Endocrinol Lett (2010 ) 31:635–44.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Takamoto T Hori Y Koga Y Toshima H Hara A Yokoyama MM. Norepinephrine inhibits human natural killer cell activity in vitro. Int J Neurosci (1991 ) 58:127–31.

    Not in our library10.3109/00207459108987189

  31. 31.

    Jetschmann JU Benschop RJ Jacobs R Kemper A Oberbeck R Schmidt RE Expression and in-vivo modulation of alpha- and beta-adrenoceptors on human natural killer (CD16+) cells. J Neuroimmunol (1997 ) 74:159–64.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0165-5728(96)00221-4

  32. 32.

    Benschop RJ Oostveen FG Heijnen CJ Ballieux RE. Beta 2-adrenergic stimulation causes detachment of natural killer cells from cultured endothelium. Eur J Immunol (1993 ) 23:3242–7.

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.1830231230

  33. 33.

    Schedlowski M Hosch W Oberbeck R Benschop RJ Jacobs R Raab HR Catecholamines modulate human NK cell circulation and function via spleen-independent beta 2-adrenergic mechanisms. J Immunol (1996 ) 156:93–9.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Muthu K Iyer S He LK Szilagyi A Gamelli RL Shankar R Murine hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors express adrenergic receptors. J Neuroimmunol (2007 ) 186:27–36.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.02.007

  35. 35.

    Cremaschi GA Fisher P Boege F. Beta-adrenoceptor distribution in murine lymphoid cell lines. Immunopharmacology (1991 ) 22:195–206.

    Not in our library10.1016/0162-3109(91)90044-y

  36. 36.

    Kohm AP Sanders VM. Suppression of antigen-specific Th2 cell-dependent IgM and IgG1 production following norepinephrine depletion in vivo. J Immunol (1999 ) 162:5299–308.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Van Tits LJ Michel MC Grosse-Wilde H Happel M Eigler FW Soliman A Catecholamines increase lymphocyte beta 2-adrenergic receptors via a beta 2-adrenergic, spleen-dependent process. Am J Physiol (1990 ) 258:E191–202.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpendo.1990.258.1.e191

  38. 38.

    Bartik MM Bauman GP Brooks WH Roszman TL. Costimulatory signals modulate the antiproliferative effects of agents that elevate cAMP in T cells. Cell Immunol (1994 ) 158:116–30.

    Not in our library10.1006/cimm.1994.1261

  39. 39.

    Bauman GP Bartik MM Brooks WH Roszman TL. Induction of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) activity in T cells after stimulation of the prostaglandin E2 or the beta-adrenergic receptors: relationship between PKA activity and inhibition of anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody-induced T cell proliferation. Cell Immunol (1994 ) 158:182–94.

    Not in our library10.1006/cimm.1994.1266

  40. 40.

    Kasprowicz DJ Kohm AP Berton MT Chruscinski AJ Sharpe A Sanders VM. Stimulation of the B cell receptor, CD86 (B7-2), and the beta 2-adrenergic receptor intrinsically modulates the level of IgG1 and IgE produced per B cell. J Immunol (2000 ) 165:680–90.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.165.2.680

  41. 41.
  42. 42.

    Qin JF Jin FJ Li N Guan HT Lan L Ni H Adrenergic receptor beta2 activation by stress promotes breast cancer progression through macrophages M2 polarization in tumor microenvironment. BMB Rep (2015 ) 48:295–300.

    Not in our library10.5483/bmbrep.2015.48.5.008

  43. 43.

    Sloan EK Priceman SJ Cox BF Yu S Pimentel MA Tangkanangnukul V The sympathetic nervous system induces a metastatic switch in primary breast cancer. Cancer Res (2010 ) 70:7042–52.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0522

  44. 44.

    Lamkin DM Ho HY Ong TH Kawanishi CK Stoffers VL Ahlawat N beta-adrenergic-stimulated macrophages: comprehensive localization in the M1-M2 spectrum. Brain Behav Immun (2016 ) 57:338–46.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2016.07.162

  45. 45.

    Grailer JJ Haggadone MD Sarma JV Zetoune FS Ward PA Induction of M2 regulatory macrophages through the beta2-adrenergic receptor with protection during endotoxemia and acute lung injury. J Innate Immun (2014 ) 6:607–18.

    Not in our library10.1159/000358524

  46. 46.

    Gabanyi I Muller PA Feighery L Oliveira TY Costa-Pinto FA Mucida D. Neuro-immune interactions drive tissue programming in intestinal macrophages. Cell (2016 ) 164:378–91.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.023

  47. 47.

    Victoni T Salvator H Abrial C Brollo M Porto LCS Lagente V Human lung and monocyte-derived macrophages differ with regard to the effects of beta2-adrenoceptor agonists on cytokine release. Respir Res (2017 ) 18:126

    Not in our library10.1186/s12931-017-0613-y

  48. 48.

    Sharma M Patterson L Chapman E Flood PM Salmeterol, a long-acting beta2-adrenergic receptor agonist, inhibits macrophage activation by lipopolysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontol (2017 ) 88:681–92.

    Not in our library10.1902/jop.2017.160464

  49. 49.

    Gill SK Marriott HM Suvarna SK Peachell PT Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory effects of beta-adrenoceptor agonists on human lung macrophages. Eur J Pharmacol (2016 ) 793:49–55.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.11.005

  50. 50.

    Roewe J Higer M Riehl DR Gericke A Radsak MP Bosmann M. Neuroendocrine modulation of IL-27 in macrophages. J Immunol (2017 ) 199:2503–14.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1700687

  51. 51.

    Huang JL Zhang YL Wang CC Zhou JR Ma Q Wang X Enhanced phosphorylation of MAPKs by NE promotes TNF-alpha production by macrophage through alpha adrenergic receptor. Inflammation (2012 ) 35:527–34.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10753-011-9342-4

  52. 52.

    Wu H Chen J Song S Yuan P Liu L Zhang Y beta2-adrenoceptor signaling reduction in dendritic cells is involved in the inflammatory response in adjuvant-induced arthritic rats. Sci Rep (2016 ) 6:24548

    Not in our library10.1038/srep24548

  53. 53.

    Chen G Le Y Zhou L Gong L Li X Li Y Dexmedetomidine inhibits maturation and function of human cord blood-derived dendritic cells by interfering with synthesis and secretion of IL-12 and IL-23. PLoS One (2016 ) 11:e0153288.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0153288

  54. 54.

    Takenaka MC Araujo LP Maricato JT Nascimento VM Guereschi MG Rezende RM Norepinephrine controls effector T cell differentiation through beta2-adrenergic receptor-mediated inhibition of NF-kappaB and AP-1 in dendritic cells. J Immunol (2016 ) 196:637–44.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1501206

  55. 55.

    Giordani L Cuzziol N Del Pinto T Sanchez M Maccari S Massimi A beta2-Agonist clenbuterol hinders human monocyte differentiation into dendritic cells. Exp Cell Res (2015 ) 339:163–73.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.032

  56. 56.

    Yanagawa Y Matsumoto M Togashi H. Adrenoceptor-mediated enhancement of interleukin-33 production by dendritic cells. Brain Behav Immun (2011 ) 25:1427–33.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2011.04.012

  57. 57.

    Goyarts E Matsui M Mammone T Bender AM Wagner JA Maes D Norepinephrine modulates human dendritic cell activation by altering cytokine release. Exp Dermatol (2008 ) 17:188–96.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00677.x

  58. 58.

    Maestroni GJ Mazzola P. Langerhans cells beta 2-adrenoceptors: role in migration, cytokine production, Th priming and contact hypersensitivity. J Neuroimmunol (2003 ) 144:91–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.08.039

  59. 59.

    Yang H Du RZ Qiu JP Tang YQ Chen SC Bisoprolol reverses epinephrine-mediated inhibition of cell emigration through increases in the expression of beta-arrestin 2 and CCR7 and PI3K phosphorylation, in dendritic cells loaded with cholesterol. Thromb Res (2013 ) 131:230–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.thromres.2012.12.009

  60. 60.

    Ueshima H Inada T Shingu K Suppression of phagosome proteolysis and Matrigel migration with the alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist dexmedetomidine in murine dendritic cells. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol (2013 ) 35:558–66.

    Not in our library10.3109/08923973.2013.822509

  61. 61.

    Seiffert K Hosoi J Torii H Ozawa H Ding W Campton K Catecholamines inhibit the antigen-presenting capability of epidermal Langerhans cells. J Immunol (2002 ) 168:6128–35.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.168.12.6128

  62. 62.

    Herve J Dubreil L Tardif V Terme M Pogu S Anegon I beta2-adrenoreceptor agonist inhibits antigen cross-presentation by dendritic cells. J Immunol (2013 ) 190:3163–71.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1201391

  63. 63.

    Kokolus KM Spangler HM Povinelli BJ Farren MR Lee KP Repasky EA Stressful presentations: mild cold stress in laboratory mice influences phenotype of dendritic cells in naive and tumor-bearing mice. Front Immunol (2014 ) 5:23

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2014.00023

  64. 64.

    Kanemi O Zhang X Sakamoto Y Ebina M Nagatomi R. Acute stress reduces intraparenchymal lung natural killer cells via beta-adrenergic stimulation. Clin Exp Immunol (2005 ) 139:25–34.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02672.x

  65. 65.

    Shakhar G Ben-Eliyahu S. In vivo beta-adrenergic stimulation suppresses natural killer activity and compromises resistance to tumor metastasis in rats. J Immunol (1998 ) 160:3251–8.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    De Lorenzo BH de Oliveira Marchioro L Greco CR Suchecki D Sleep-deprivation reduces NK cell number and function mediated by beta-adrenergic signalling. Psychoneuroendocrinology (2015 ) 57:134–43.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.04.006

  67. 67.

    Tarr AJ Powell ND Reader BF Bhave NS Roloson AL Carson WE III beta-Adrenergic receptor mediated increases in activation and function of natural killer cells following repeated social disruption. Brain Behav Immun (2012 ) 26:1226–38.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2012.07.002

  68. 68.

    Song Y Gan Y Wang Q Meng Z Li G Shen Y Enriching the housing environment for mice enhances their NK cell antitumor immunity via sympathetic nerve-dependent regulation of NKG2D and CCR5. Cancer Res (2017 ) 77:1611–22.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-2143

  69. 69.

    Noguchi T Nakagome K Kobayashi T Ueda Y Soma T Nakamoto H Effect of beta2-adrenergic agonists on eosinophil adhesion, superoxide anion generation, and degranulation. Allergol Int (2015 ) 64(Suppl):S46–53.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.alit.2015.05.009

  70. 70.

    Gosain A Gamelli RL DiPietro LA. Norepinephrine-mediated suppression of phagocytosis by wound neutrophils. J Surg Res (2009 ) 152:311–8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jss.2008.05.001

  71. 71.

    Lajevic MD Suleiman S Cohen RL Chambers DA. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase by norepinephrine in T-lineage cells. Immunology (2011 ) 132:197–208.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03354.x

  72. 72.
  73. 73.

    Riether C Kavelaars A Wirth T Pacheco-Lopez G Doenlen R Willemen H Stimulation of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors inhibits calcineurin activity in CD4(+) T cells via PKA-AKAP interaction. Brain Behav Immun (2011 ) 25:59–66.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2010.07.248

  74. 74.

    McAlees JW Smith LT Erbe RS Jarjoura D Ponzio NM Sanders VM. Epigenetic regulation of beta2-adrenergic receptor expression in T(H)1 and T(H)2 cells. Brain Behav Immun (2011 ) 25:408–15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.019

  75. 75.

    Heijink IH Vellenga E Borger P Postma DS Monchy JG Kauffman HF. Polarized Th1 and Th2 cells are less responsive to negative feedback by receptors coupled to the AC/cAMP system compared to freshly isolated T cells. Br J Pharmacol (2003 ) 138:1441–50.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.bjp.0705193

  76. 76.

    Slota C Shi A Chen G Bevans M Weng NP. Norepinephrine preferentially modulates memory CD8 T cell function inducing inflammatory cytokine production and reducing proliferation in response to activation. Brain Behav Immun (2015 ) 46:168–79.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2015.01.015

  77. 77.

    Wahle M Stachetzki U Krause A Pierer M Hantzschel H Baerwald CG. Regulation of beta2-adrenergic receptors on CD4 and CD8 positive lymphocytes by cytokines in vitro. Cytokine (2001 ) 16:205–9.

    Not in our library10.1006/cyto.2001.0965

  78. 78.

    Grebe KM Hickman HD Irvine KR Takeda K Bennink JR Yewdell JW. Sympathetic nervous system control of anti-influenza CD8+ T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009 ) 106:5300–5.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0808851106

  79. 79.

    Estrada LD Agac D Farrar JD Sympathetic neural signaling via the beta2-adrenergic receptor suppresses T-cell receptor-mediated human and mouse CD8(+) T-cell effector function. Eur J Immunol (2016 ) 46:1948–58.

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.201646395

  80. 80.

    Simonini MV Polak PE Sharp A McGuire S Galea E Feinstein DL. Increasing CNS noradrenaline reduces EAE severity. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol (2010 ) 5:252–9.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11481-009-9182-2

  81. 81.

    Bucsek MJ Giridharan T MacDonald CR Hylander BL Repasky EA An overview of the role of sympathetic regulation of immune responses in infectious disease and autoimmunity. Int J Hyperthermia (2018 ).

    Not in our library10.1080/02656736.2017.1411621

  82. 82.

    Cohen S Levi-Montalcini R Hamburger V A nerve growth-stimulating factor isolated from Sarcom AS 37 and 180. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1954 ) 40:1014–8.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.40.10.1014

  83. 83.

    Entschladen F Palm D Lang K Drell TLT Zaenker KS. Neoneurogenesis: tumors may initiate their own innervation by the release of neurotrophic factors in analogy to lymphangiogenesis and neoangiogenesis. Med Hypotheses (2006 ) 67:33–5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mehy.2006.01.015

  84. 84.

    Magnon C Hall SJ Lin J Xue X Gerber L Freedland SJ Autonomic nerve development contributes to prostate cancer progression. Science (2013 ) 341:1236361.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1236361

  85. 85.

    Eng JW Reed CB Kokolus KM Pitoniak R Utley A Bucsek MJ Housing temperature-induced stress drives therapeutic resistance in murine tumour models through beta-adrenergic receptor activation. Nat Commun (2015 ) 6:6426

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms7426

  86. 86.

    Lutgendorf SK DeGeest K Dahmoush L Farley D Penedo F Bender D Social isolation is associated with elevated tumor norepinephrine in ovarian carcinoma patients. Brain Behav Immun (2011 ) 25:250–5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.012

  87. 87.

    Szpunar MJ Belcher EK Dawes RP Madden KS. Sympathetic innervation, norepinephrine content, and norepinephrine turnover in orthotopic and spontaneous models of breast cancer. Brain Behav Immun (2016 ) 53:223–33.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2015.12.014

  88. 88.

    Thaker PH Han LY Kamat AA Arevalo JM Takahashi R Lu C Chronic stress promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis in a mouse model of ovarian carcinoma. Nat Med (2006 ) 12:939–44.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm1447

  89. 89.

    Hara MR Kovacs JJ Whalen EJ Rajagopal S Strachan RT Grant W A stress response pathway regulates DNA damage through beta2-adrenoreceptors and beta-arrestin-1. Nature (2011 ) 477:349–53.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10368

  90. 90.

    Hara MR Sachs BD Caron MG Lefkowitz RJ Pharmacological blockade of a beta(2)AR-beta-arrestin-1 signaling cascade prevents the accumulation of DNA damage in a behavioral stress model. Cell Cycle (2013 ) 12:219–24.

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.23368

  91. 91.

    Flint MS Baum A Episcopo B Knickelbein KZ Liegey Dougall AJ Chambers WH Chronic exposure to stress hormones promotes transformation and tumorigenicity of 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Stress (2013 ) 16:114–21.

    Not in our library10.3109/10253890.2012.686075

  92. 92.

    Cole SW Nagaraja AS Lutgendorf SK Green PA Sood AK. Sympathetic nervous system regulation of the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Cancer (2015 ) 15:563–72.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc3978

  93. 93.

    Mathur MB Epel E Kind S Desai M Parks CG Sandler DP Perceived stress and telomere length: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and methodologic considerations for advancing the field. Brain Behav Immun (2016 ) 54:158–69.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2016.02.002

  94. 94.

    Wentzensen IM Mirabello L Pfeiffer RM Savage SA. The association of telomere length and cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2011 ) 20:1238–50.

    Not in our library10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0005

  95. 95.

    Huang XY Wang HC Yuan Z Huang J Zheng Q Norepinephrine stimulates pancreatic cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion via beta-adrenergic receptor-dependent activation of P38/MAPK pathway. Hepatogastroenterology (2012 ) 59:889–93.

    Not in our library10.5754/hge11476

  96. 96.

    Wu FQ Fang T Yu LX Lv GS Lv HW Liang D ADRB2 signaling promotes HCC progression and sorafenib resistance by inhibiting autophagic degradation of HIF1alpha. J Hepatol (2016 ) 65:314–24.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.019

  97. 97.

    Coelho M Soares-Silva C Brandao D Marino F Cosentino M Ribeiro L beta-Adrenergic modulation of cancer cell proliferation: available evidence and clinical perspectives. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2017 ) 143:275–91.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00432-016-2278-1

  98. 98.

    Dal Monte M Fornaciari I Nicchia GP Svelto M Casini G Bagnoli P beta3-adrenergic receptor activity modulates melanoma cell proliferation and survival through nitric oxide signaling. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol (2014 ) 387:533–43.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00210-014-0969-1

  99. 99.

    Lin X Luo K Lv Z Huang J. Beta-adrenoceptor action on pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth in mice. Hepatogastroenterology (2012 ) 59:584–8.

    Not in our library10.5754/hge11271

  100. 100.

    Shan T Ma Q Zhang D Guo K Liu H Wang F beta2-adrenoceptor blocker synergizes with gemcitabine to inhibit the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells via apoptosis induction. Eur J Pharmacol (2011 ) 665:1–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.04.055

  101. 101.

    Zhang D Ma Q Shen S Hu H. Inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell proliferation by propranolol occurs through apoptosis induction: the study of beta-adrenoceptor antagonist’s anticancer effect in pancreatic cancer cell. Pancreas (2009 ) 38:94–100.

    Not in our library10.1097/mpa.0b013e318184f50c

  102. 102.

    Zhou C Chen X Zeng W Peng C Huang G Li X Propranolol induced G0/G1/S phase arrest and apoptosis in melanoma cells via AKT/MAPK pathway. Oncotarget (2016 ) 7:68314–27.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.11599

  103. 103.

    Zhang D Ma Q Wang Z Zhang M Guo K Wang F beta2-adrenoceptor blockage induces G1/S phase arrest and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells via Ras/Akt/NFkappaB pathway. Mol Cancer (2011 ) 10:146

    Not in our library10.1186/1476-4598-10-146

  104. 104.

    Hassan S Karpova Y Baiz D Yancey D Pullikuth A Flores A Behavioral stress accelerates prostate cancer development in mice. J Clin Invest (2013 ) 123:874–86.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci63324

  105. 105.
  106. 106.

    Sood AK Armaiz-Pena GN Halder J Nick AM Stone RL Hu W Adrenergic modulation of focal adhesion kinase protects human ovarian cancer cells from anoikis. J Clin Invest (2010 ) 120:1515–23.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci40802

  107. 107.

    Zhang J Deng YT Liu J Wang YQ Yi TW Huang BY Norepinephrine induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in HT-29 and A549 cells in vitro. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2016 ) 142:423–35.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00432-015-2044-9

  108. 108.

    Pu J Zhang X Luo H Xu L Lu X Lu J Adrenaline promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via HuR-TGFbeta regulatory axis in pancreatic cancer cells and the implication in cancer prognosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2017 ) 493:1273–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.09.146

  109. 109.

    Lu YJ Geng ZJ Sun XY Li YH Fu XB Zhao XY Isoprenaline induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem (2015 ) 408:1–13.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11010-015-2477-0

  110. 110.

    Shan T Cui X Li W Lin W Li Y Chen X Novel regulatory program for norepinephrine-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines. Cancer Sci (2014 ) 105:847–56.

    Not in our library10.1111/cas.12438

  111. 111.

    Lutgendorf SK Thaker PH Arevalo JM Goodheart MJ Slavich GM Sood AK Biobehavioral modulation of the exosome transcriptome in ovarian carcinoma. Cancer (2018 ) 124(3):580–86.

    Not in our library10.1002/cncr.31078

  112. 112.

    Le CP Sloan EK. Stress-driven lymphatic dissemination: an unanticipated consequence of communication between the sympathetic nervous system and lymphatic vasculature. Mol Cell Oncol (2016 ) 3:e1177674.

    Not in our library10.1080/23723556.2016.1177674

  113. 113.

    Armaiz-Pena GN Allen JK Cruz A Stone RL Nick AM Lin YG Src activation by beta-adrenoreceptors is a key switch for tumour metastasis. Nat Commun (2013 ) 4:1403

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms2903

  114. 114.

    Benish M Bartal I Goldfarb Y Levi B Avraham R Raz A Perioperative use of beta-blockers and COX-2 inhibitors may improve immune competence and reduce the risk of tumor metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol (2008 ) 15:2042–52.

    Not in our library10.1245/s10434-008-9890-5

  115. 115.
  116. 116.

    Elefteriou F. Chronic stress, sympathetic activation and skeletal metastasis of breast cancer cells. Bonekey Rep (2015 ) 4:693.

    Not in our library10.1038/bonekey.2015.61

  117. 117.

    Glasner A Avraham R Rosenne E Benish M Zmora O Shemer S Improving survival rates in two models of spontaneous postoperative metastasis in mice by combined administration of a beta-adrenergic antagonist and a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. J Immunol (2010 ) 184:2449–57.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0903301

  118. 118.

    Magnon C. Role of the autonomic nervous system in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Mol Cell Oncol (2015 ) 2:e975643.

    Not in our library10.4161/23723556.2014.975643

  119. 119.

    Nagaraja AS Dorniak PL Sadaoui NC Kang Y Lin T Armaiz-Pena G Sustained adrenergic signaling leads to increased metastasis in ovarian cancer via increased PGE2 synthesis. Oncogene (2016 ) 35:2390–7.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2015.302

  120. 120.

    Palm D Lang K Niggemann B Drell TLT Masur K Zaenker KS The norepinephrine-driven metastasis development of PC-3 human prostate cancer cells in BALB/c nude mice is inhibited by beta-blockers. Int J Cancer (2006 ) 118:2744–9.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.21723

  121. 121.
  122. 122.

    Creed SJ Le CP Hassan M Pon CK Albold S Chan KT beta2-adrenoceptor signaling regulates invadopodia formation to enhance tumor cell invasion. Breast Cancer Res (2015 ) 17:145

    Not in our library10.1186/s13058-015-0655-3

  123. 123.

    Kim-Fuchs C Le CP Pimentel MA Shackleford D Ferrari D Angst E Chronic stress accelerates pancreatic cancer growth and invasion: a critical role for beta-adrenergic signaling in the pancreatic microenvironment. Brain Behav Immun (2014 ) 40:40–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2014.02.019

  124. 124.

    Nagaraja AS Dood RL Armaiz-Pena G Kang Y Wu SY Allen JK Adrenergic-mediated increases in INHBA drive CAF phenotype and collagens. JCI Insight (2017 ) 2.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.93076

  125. 125.

    Park SY Kang JH Jeong KJ Lee J Han JW Choi WS Norepinephrine induces VEGF expression and angiogenesis by a hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha protein-dependent mechanism. Int J Cancer (2011 ) 128:2306–16.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.25589

  126. 126.

    Yang EV Kim SJ Donovan EL Chen M Gross AC Webster Marketon JI Norepinephrine upregulates VEGF, IL-8, and IL-6 expression in human melanoma tumor cell lines: implications for stress-related enhancement of tumor progression. Brain Behav Immun (2009 ) 23:267–75.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2008.10.005

  127. 127.

    Yang EV Sood AK Chen M Li Y Eubank TD Marsh CB Norepinephrine up-regulates the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, and MMP-9 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumor cells. Cancer Res (2006 ) 66:10357–64.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-2496

  128. 128.

    Chen H Liu D Yang Z Sun L Deng Q Yang S Adrenergic signaling promotes angiogenesis through endothelial cell-tumor cell crosstalk. Endocr Relat Cancer (2014 ) 21:783–95.

    Not in our library10.1530/erc-14-0236

  129. 129.

    Hulsurkar M Li Z Zhang Y Li X Zheng D Li W. Beta-adrenergic signaling promotes tumor angiogenesis and prostate cancer progression through HDAC2-mediated suppression of thrombospondin-1. Oncogene (2017 ) 36:1525–36.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2016.319

  130. 130.

    Wu W Murata J Murakami K Yamaura T Hayashi K Saiki I. Social isolation stress augments angiogenesis induced by colon 26-L5 carcinoma cells in mice. Clin Exp Metastasis (2000 ) 18:1–10.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1026548715669

  131. 131.

    Zahalka AH Arnal-Estape A Maryanovich M Nakahara F Cruz CD Finley LWS Adrenergic nerves activate an angio-metabolic switch in prostate cancer. Science (2017 ) 358:321–6.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aah5072

  132. 132.
  133. 133.

    Chen H Liu D Guo L Cheng X Guo N Shi M Chronic psychological stress promotes lung metastatic colonization of circulating breast cancer cells by decorating a pre-metastatic niche through activating beta-adrenergic signaling. J Pathol (2018 ) 244:49–60.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.4988

  134. 134.

    Bucsek MJ Qiao G MacDonald CR Giridharan T Evans L Niedzwecki B β-adrenergic signaling in mice housed at standard temperatures suppresses an effector phenotype in CD8+ T cells and undermines checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Cancer Res (2017 ) 77(20):5639–51.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0546

  135. 135.

    Wrobel JL Bod L Lengagne R Kato M Prevost-Blondel A Le Gal FA. Propranolol induces a favourable shift of anti-tumor immunity in a murine spontaneous model of melanoma. Oncotarget (2016 ) 7:77825–37.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.12833

  136. 136.

    Kokolus KM Capitano ML Lee CT Eng JW Waight JD Hylander BL Baseline tumor growth and immune control in laboratory mice are significantly influenced by subthermoneutral housing temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2013 ) 110:20176–81.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1304291110

  137. 137.

    Schmidt D Peterlik D Reber SO Lechner A Mannel DN. Induction of suppressor cells and increased tumor growth following chronic psychosocial stress in male mice. PLoS One (2016 ) 11:e0159059.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0159059

  138. 138.

    Zhou L Li Y Li X Chen G Liang H Wu Y Propranolol attenuates surgical stress-induced elevation of the regulatory T cell response in patients undergoing radical mastectomy. J Immunol (2016 ) 196:3460–9.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1501677

  139. 139.

    Jin J Wang X Wang Q Guo X Cao J Zhang X Chronic psychological stress induces the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mice. PLoS One (2013 ) 8:e74497.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0074497

  140. 140.

    Szabo S Tache Y Somogyi A The legacy of Hans Selye and the origins of stress research: a retrospective 75 years after his landmark brief “letter” to the editor# of nature. Stress (2012 ) 15(5):472–78.

    Not in our library10.3109/10253890.2012.710919

  141. 141.

    Goldstein DS Catecholamines and stress. Endocr Regul (2003 ) 37:69–80.

    Not in our library

  142. 142.
  143. 143.

    Lin Q Wang F Yang R Zheng X Gao H Zhang P. Effect of chronic restraint stress on human colorectal carcinoma growth in mice. PLoS One (2013 ) 8:e61435.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0061435

  144. 144.

    Madden KS Szpunar MJ Brown EB. Early impact of social isolation and breast tumor progression in mice. Brain Behav Immun (2013 ) 30(Suppl):S135–41.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2012.05.003

  145. 145.

    Hou N Zhang X Zhao L Zhao X Li Z Song T A novel chronic stress-induced shift in the Th1 to Th2 response promotes colon cancer growth. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2013 ) 439:471–6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.08.101

  146. 146.

    Partecke LI Speerforck S Kading A Seubert F Kuhn S Lorenz E Chronic stress increases experimental pancreatic cancer growth, reduces survival and can be antagonised by beta-adrenergic receptor blockade. Pancreatology (2016 ) 16:423–33.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pan.2016.03.005

  147. 147.

    Lee JW Shahzad MM Lin YG Armaiz-Pena G Mangala LS Han HD Surgical stress promotes tumor growth in ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res (2009 ) 15:2695–702.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-2966

  148. 148.

    Dethlefsen C Hansen LS Lillelund C Andersen C Gehl J Christensen JF Exercise-induced catecholamines activate the hippo tumor suppressor pathway to reduce risks of breast cancer development. Cancer Res (2017 ) 77:4894–904.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-3125

  149. 149.

    Demas GE Carlton ED. Ecoimmunology for psychoneuroimmunologists: considering context in neuroendocrine-immune-behavior interactions. Brain Behav Immun (2015 ) 44:9–16.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2014.09.002

  150. 150.

    National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed Washington, DC: National Academies (2011 ).

    Not in our library

  151. 151.

    Hylander BL Repasky EA. Thermoneutrality, mice and cancer: a heated opinion. Trends Cancer (2016 ) 2:166–75.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trecan.2016.03.005

  152. 152.

    Karp CL. Unstressing intemperate models: how cold stress undermines mouse modeling. J Exp Med (2012 ) 209:1069–74.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20120988

  153. 153.

    Messmer MN Kokolus KM Eng JW Abrams SI Repasky EA. Mild cold-stress depresses immune responses: implications for cancer models involving laboratory mice. Bioessays (2014 ) 36:884–91.

    Not in our library10.1002/bies.201400066

  154. 154.

    Giles DA Moreno-Fernandez ME Stankiewicz TE Graspeuntner S Cappelletti M Wu D Thermoneutral housing exacerbates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mice and allows for sex-independent disease modeling. Nat Med (2017 ) 23:829–38.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.4346

  155. 155.

    Giles DA Ramkhelawon B Donelan EM Stankiewicz TE Hutchison SB Mukherjee R Modulation of ambient temperature promotes inflammation and initiates atherosclerosis in wild type C57BL/6 mice. Mol Metab (2016 ) 5:1121–30.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molmet.2016.09.008

  156. 156.

    Tian XY Ganeshan K Hong C Nguyen KD Qiu Y Kim J Thermoneutral housing accelerates metabolic inflammation to potentiate atherosclerosis but not insulin resistance. Cell Metab (2015 ) 23(1):165–78.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2015.10.003

  157. 157.

    Woollard KJ Murphy AJ The endless summer: thermoneutrality prevents monocytosis and reduces atherosclerosis. Circ Res (2017 ) 121:596–8.

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.117.311721

  158. 158.

    Vandal M White PJ Tournissac M Tremblay C St-Amour I Drouin-Ouellet J Impaired thermoregulation and beneficial effects of thermoneutrality in the 3xTg-AD model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging (2016 ) 43:47–57.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.03.024

  159. 159.

    Williams JW Elvington A Ivanov S Kessler S Luehmann H Baba O Thermoneutrality but not UCP1 deficiency suppresses monocyte mobilization into blood. Circ Res (2017 ) 121:662–76.

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.117.311519

  160. 160.
  161. 161.

    Razzoli M Frontini A Gurney A Mondini E Cubuk C Katz LS Stress-induced activation of brown adipose tissue prevents obesity in conditions of low adaptive thermogenesis. Mol Metab (2016 ) 5:19–33.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molmet.2015.10.005

  162. 162.

    Xiao C Goldgof M Gavrilova O Reitman ML Anti-obesity and metabolic efficacy of the beta3-adrenergic agonist, CL316243, in mice at thermoneutrality compared to 22 degrees C. Obesity (Silver Spring) (2015 ) 23:1450–9.

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.21124

  163. 163.

    Ganeshan K Chawla A. Warming the mouse to model human diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2017 ) 13:458–65.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrendo.2017.48

  164. 164.

    Gordon CJ. The mouse thermoregulatory system: its impact on translating biomedical data to humans. Physiol Behav (2017 ) 179:55–66.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.026

  165. 165.

    Galluzzi L Buque A Kepp O Zitvogel L Kroemer G. Immunological effects of conventional chemotherapy and targeted anticancer agents. Cancer Cell (2015 ) 28:690–714.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2015.10.012

  166. 166.

    Ngiow SF Young A Jacquelot N Yamazaki T Enot D Zitvogel L A threshold level of intratumor CD8+ T-cell PD1 expression dictates therapeutic response to anti-PD1. Cancer Res (2015 ) 75:3800–11.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-1082

  167. 167.

    Zitvogel L Apetoh L Ghiringhelli F Andre F Tesniere A Kroemer G. The anticancer immune response: indispensable for therapeutic success? J Clin Invest (2008 ) 118:1991–2001.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci35180

  168. 168.

    Zitvogel L Galluzzi L Smyth MJ Kroemer G. Mechanism of action of conventional and targeted anticancer therapies: reinstating immunosurveillance. Immunity (2013 ) 39:74–88.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.014

  169. 169.
  170. 170.

    Pilones KA Vanpouille-Box C Demaria S. Combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Semin Radiat Oncol (2015 ) 25:28–33.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semradonc.2014.07.004

  171. 171.
  172. 172.

    Gordon CJ Puckett ET Repasky ES Johnstone AF. A device that allows rodents to behaviorally thermoregulate when housed in vivariums. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci (2017 ) 56:173–6.

    Not in our library

  173. 173.

    Gaskill BN Garner JP. Stressed out: providing laboratory animals with behavioral control to reduce the physiological effects of stress. Lab Anim (NY) (2017 ) 46:142–5.

    Not in our library10.1038/laban.1218

  174. 174.

    Gaskill BN Gordon CJ Pajor EA Lucas JR Davis JK Garner JP. Impact of nesting material on mouse body temperature and physiology. Physiol Behav (2013 ) 11(0–111):87–95.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.12.018

  175. 175.

    Sardi I Giunti L Bresci C Buccoliero AM Degl’innocenti D Cardellicchio S Expression of beta-adrenergic receptors in pediatric malignant brain tumors. Oncol Lett (2013 ) 5:221–5.

    Not in our library10.3892/ol.2012.989

  176. 176.

    Whitsett JA Burdsall J Workman L Hollinger B Neely J. beta-Adrenergic receptors in pediatric tumors: uncoupled beta 1-adrenergic receptor in Ewing’s sarcoma. J Natl Cancer Inst (1983 ) 71:779–86.

    Not in our library

  177. 177.

    Kondratenko TY Zacharova IV Kuzina NV Katukov V Severin ES Kornilova Z Alterations in human lung adrenergic receptors in cancer. Biochem Mol Biol Int (1993 ) 29:123–30.

    Not in our library

  178. 178.

    Moretti S Massi D Farini V Baroni G Parri M Innocenti S beta-adrenoceptors are upregulated in human melanoma and their activation releases pro-tumorigenic cytokines and metalloproteases in melanoma cell lines. Lab Invest (2013 ) 93:279–90.

    Not in our library10.1038/labinvest.2012.175

  179. 179.

    Nagmani R Pasco DS Salas RD Feller DR. Evaluation of beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes in the human prostate cancer cell line-LNCaP. Biochem Pharmacol (2003 ) 65:1489–94.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-2952(03)00105-9

  180. 180.

    Cardwell CR Coleman HG Murray LJ Entschladen F Powe DG. Beta-blocker usage and breast cancer survival: a nested case-control study within a UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink cohort. Int J Epidemiol (2013 ) 42:1852–61.

    Not in our library10.1093/ije/dyt196

  181. 181.

    Cardwell CR Coleman HG Murray LJ O’Sullivan JM Powe DG. Beta-blocker usage and prostate cancer survival: a nested case-control study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink cohort. Cancer Epidemiol (2014 ) 38:279–85.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canep.2014.03.011

  182. 182.

    Hicks BM Murray LJ Powe DG Hughes CM Cardwell CR beta-Blocker usage and colorectal cancer mortality: a nested case-control study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink cohort. Ann Oncol (2013 ) 24:3100–6.

    Not in our library10.1093/annonc/mdt381

  183. 183.

    Livingstone E Hollestein LM van Herk-Sukel MP van de Poll-Franse L Nijsten T Schadendorf D beta-Blocker use and all-cause mortality of melanoma patients: results from a population-based Dutch cohort study. Eur J Cancer (2013 ) 49:3863–71.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.141

  184. 184.

    McCourt C Coleman HG Murray LJ Cantwell MM Dolan O Powe DG Beta-blocker usage after malignant melanoma diagnosis and survival: a population-based nested case-control study. Br J Dermatol (2014 ) 170:930–8.

    Not in our library10.1111/bjd.12894

  185. 185.

    Parker WP Lohse CM Zaid HB Cheville JC Boorjian SA Leibovich BC Evaluation of beta-blockers and survival among hypertensive patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol (2017 ) 35:36.e31–6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.08.013

  186. 186.

    Yang P Deng W Han Y Shi Y Xu T Shi J Analysis of the correlation among hypertension, the intake of beta-blockers, and overall survival outcome in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Cancer Res (2017 ) 7:946–54.

    Not in our library

  187. 187.

    Kokolus KM Zhang Y Sivik JM Schmeck C Zhu J Repasky EA Beta blocker use correlates with better overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients and improves the efficacy of immunotherapies in mice. Oncoimmunology (2017 ) 7(3).

    Not in our library10.1080/2162402x.2017.1405205

  188. 188.

    Grytli HH Fagerland MW Fossa SD Tasken KA Haheim LL Use of beta-blockers is associated with prostate cancer-specific survival in prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy. Prostate (2013 ) 73:250–60.

    Not in our library10.1002/pros.22564

  189. 189.

    Grytli HH Fagerland MW Fossa SD Tasken KA Association between use of beta-blockers and prostate cancer-specific survival: a cohort study of 3561 prostate cancer patients with high-risk or metastatic disease. Eur Urol (2014 ) 65:635–41.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.007

  190. 190.

    Kaapu KJ Ahti J Tammela TL Auvinen A Murtola TJ. Sotalol, but not digoxin is associated with decreased prostate cancer risk: a population-based case-control study. Int J Cancer (2015 ) 137:1187–95.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.29470

  191. 191.

    De Giorgi V Grazzini M Gandini S Benemei S Lotti T Marchionni N Treatment with beta-blockers and reduced disease progression in patients with thick melanoma. Arch Intern Med (2011 ) 171:779–81.

    Not in our library10.1001/archinternmed.2011.131

  192. 192.

    Lemeshow S Sorensen HT Phillips G Yang EV Antonsen S Riis AH beta-Blockers and survival among Danish patients with malignant melanoma: a population-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2011 ) 20:2273–9.

    Not in our library10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0249

  193. 193.

    Diaz ES Karlan BY Li AJ. Impact of beta blockers on epithelial ovarian cancer survival. Gynecol Oncol (2012 ) 127:375–8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.102

  194. 194.

    Wang HM Liao ZX Komaki R Welsh JW O’Reilly MS Chang JY Improved survival outcomes with the incidental use of beta-blockers among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy. Ann Oncol (2013 ) 24:1312–9.

    Not in our library10.1093/annonc/mds616

  195. 195.

    Botteri E Munzone E Rotmensz N Cipolla C De Giorgi V Santillo B Therapeutic effect of beta-blockers in triple-negative breast cancer postmenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2013 ) 140:567–75.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10549-013-2654-3

  196. 196.

    Melhem-Bertrandt A Chavez-Macgregor M Lei X Brown EN Lee RT Meric-Bernstam F Beta-blocker use is associated with improved relapse-free survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2011 ) 29:2645–52.

    Not in our library10.1200/jco.2010.33.4441

  197. 197.
  198. 198.

    Jansen L Hoffmeister M Arndt V Chang-Claude J Brenner H. Stage-specific associations between beta blocker use and prognosis after colorectal cancer. Cancer (2014 ) 120:1178–86.

    Not in our library10.1002/cncr.28546

  199. 199.

    Monami M Filippi L Ungar A Sgrilli F Antenore A Dicembrini I Further data on beta-blockers and cancer risk: observational study and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Curr Med Res Opin (2013 ) 29:369–78.

    Not in our library10.1185/03007995.2013.772505

  200. 200.

    Lin CS Lin WS Lin CL Kao CH. Carvedilol use is associated with reduced cancer risk: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Int J Cardiol (2015 ) 184:9–13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.02.015

  201. 201.

    Choy C Raytis JL Smith DD Duenas M Neman J Jandial R Inhibition of beta2-adrenergic receptor reduces triple-negative breast cancer brain metastases: the potential benefit of perioperative beta-blockade. Oncol Rep (2016 ) 35:3135–42.

    Not in our library10.3892/or.2016.4710

  202. 202.

    Barron TI Connolly RM Sharp L Bennett K Visvanathan K. Beta blockers and breast cancer mortality: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol (2011 ) 29:2635–44.

    Not in our library10.1200/jco.2010.33.5422

  203. 203.

    Nkontchou G Aout M Mahmoudi A Roulot D Bourcier V Grando-Lemaire V Effect of long-term propranolol treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in patients with HCV-associated cirrhosis. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) (2012 ) 5:1007–14.

    Not in our library10.1158/1940-6207.capr-11-0450

  204. 204.

    Chang PY Huang WY Lin CL Huang TC Wu YY Chen JH Propranolol reduces cancer risk: a population-based cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) (2015 ) 94:e1097.

    Not in our library10.1097/md.0000000000001097

  205. 205.

    De Giorgi V Grazzini M Benemei S Marchionni N Botteri E Pennacchioli E Propranolol for off-label treatment of patients with melanoma: results from a cohort study. JAMA Oncol (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2908

  206. 206.

    Pantziarka P Bouche G Sukhatme V Meheus L Rooman I Sukhatme VP. Repurposing drugs in oncology (ReDO)-propranolol as an anti-cancer agent. Ecancermedicalscience (2016 ) 10:680.

    Not in our library10.3332/ecancer.2016.680

  207. 207.

    Albinana V Escribano RMJ Soler I Padial LR Recio-Poveda L Villar Gomez de Las Heras K Repurposing propranolol as a drug for the treatment of retinal haemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis (2017 ) 12:122.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13023-017-0664-7

  208. 208.

    Leaute-Labreze C Boccara O Degrugillier-Chopinet C Mazereeuw-Hautier J Prey S Lebbe G Safety of oral propranolol for the treatment of infantile hemangioma: a systematic review. Pediatrics (2016 ) 138.

    Not in our library10.1542/peds.2016-0353

  209. 209.

    Yun YJ Gyon YH Yang S Lee YK Park J Park M. A prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of oral propranolol as first-line treatment for infantile superficial hemangioma. Korean J Pediatr (2015 ) 58:484–90.

    Not in our library10.3345/kjp.2015.58.12.484

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.