No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.
Natural Killer T Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy
Shiny Nair, Madhav V. Dhodapkar
Frontiers in Immunology · 2017 · Review
Abstract
Natural killer T (NKT) cells are specialized CD1d-restricted T cells that recognize lipid antigens. Following stimulation, NKT cells lead to downstream activation of both innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. This has impelled the development of NKT cell-targeted immunotherapies for treating cancer. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the stimulatory and regulatory functions of NKT cells in tumor immunity as well as highlight preclinical and clinical studies based on NKT cells. Finally, we discuss future perspectives to better harness the potential of NKT cells for cancer therapy.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Both innate and adaptive immune systems respond to tumor cells and participate in immune-surveillance against tumor. Defined immune interactions in the context of cancer include recognition of tumor-associated antigens or cues by innate cell populations such as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) [macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs), neutrophils, and natural killer (NK) cells]. Innate immune cells rely on germline encoded pattern recognition receptors to recognize and elicit prompt response against cancer-associated danger signals, and also augment components of the adaptive immune system, composed of antigen-specific B and T cells. One of the key players that link the innate and adaptive immune systems is the natural killer T (NKT) cells. NKT cells are innate-like T lymphocytes that possess ability to quickly respond to antigenic stimulation and rapidly produce copious amounts of cytokines and chemokines. This rapid effect can modulate both innate and adaptive immunity and is important in influencing host immune responses to cancer.
Natural killer T cells are a heterogeneous subset of specialized T cells. These cells exhibit innate cell-like feature of quick response to antigenic exposure in combination with adaptive cell’s precision of antigenic recognition and diverse effector responses. Like conventional T cells, NKT cells undergo thymic development and selection and possess T cell receptor (TCR) to recognize antigens. However, unlike conventional T cells, TCR expressed by NKT cells recognize lipid antigens presented by the conserved and non-polymorphic MHC class 1 like molecule CD1d. In addition to TCRs, NKT cells also possess receptors for cytokines such as IL-12, IL-18, IL-25, and IL-23 similar to innate cells such as NK and innate lymphoid cells. These cytokine receptors can be activated by steady state expression of these inflammatory cytokines even in the absence of TCR signals. Thus, NKT cells can amalgamate signals from both TCR-mediated stimulations and inflammatory cytokines to manifest prompt release of an array of cytokines. These cytokines can in turn modulate different immune cells present in the tumor microenvironment (TME) thus influencing host immune responses to cancer. Their predominant tissue localization and ability to sense cancer-mediated changes in host lipid metabolism or breach in tissue integrity via recognition of endogenous lipids, makes NKT cells an ideal candidate for cancer immunotherapy.
Type I NKT Cells
Broadly, CD1d-restricted NKT cells can be divided into two main subsets based on their TCR diversity and antigen specificities. Type I (invariant) NKT cells, so named because of their limited TCR repertoire, express a semi-invariant TCR (iTCR) α chain (Vα14-Jα18 in mice, Vα24-Jα18 in humans) paired with a heterogeneous Vβ chain repertoire (V β 2,7 or 8.2 in mice and V β 11 in humans). The prototypic antigen for type I NKT cells is galactosylceramide (α-GalCer or KRN 7000), which was isolated from a marine sponge as part of an antitumor screen. α-GalCer is a potent activator of type I NKT cells, inducing them to release large amounts of interferon-γ (IFN-γ), which helps activate both CD8+ T cells and APCs. The primary techniques used to study type I NKT cells include staining and identification of type I NKT cells using CD1d-loaded α-GalCer tetramers, administering α-GalCer to activate and study the functions of type I NKT cells and finally using CD1d deficient mice (that lack both type I and type II NKT) or Jα18-deficient mice (lacking only type I NKT). Recent published study reported that Jα18-deficient mice in addition to having deletion in the Traj18 gene segment (essential for type I NKT cell development), also exhibited overall lower TCR repertoire caused by influence of the transgene on rearrangements of several Jα segments upstream Traj18, complicating interpretations of data obtained from the Jα18-deficient mice. To overcome this drawback, a new strain of Jα18-deficient mice lacking type I NKT cells while maintaining the overall TCR repertoire has been generated, which should facilitate future studies on type I NKT cells. Type I NKT cells can be further subdivided based on the surface expression of CD4 and CD8 into CD4+ and CD4−CD8− (DN) subsets and a small fraction of CD8+ cells found in humans. Type I NKT cells are present in different tissues in both mice and humans but at higher frequency in mice. Two very unique characteristics of type I NKT cells are that they possess dual reactivity to both self and foreign lipids, and that even at steady state type I NKT cell have an activated/memory phenotype. Functionally distinct subsets of NKT cells analogous to Th1, Th2, Th17, and TFH subsets of conventional T cells have been described. These subsets express the corresponding cytokines, transcription factors and surface markers of their conventional T cell counterparts. Type I NKT cells have a unique developmental program that is regulated by a number of transcription factors. Transcriptionally, one of the key regulators of type I NKT cell development and activated memory phenotype is the transcription factor promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF). In fact, PLZF deficient mice show profound deficiency of type I NKT cells and cytokine production. Other transcription factors that are known to impact type I NKT cell differentiation are c-Myc, RORγt, c-Myb, Elf-1, and Runx1. Furthermore, transcription factors that control conventional T cell differentiation such as Th1 lineage specific transcription factor T-bet and Th2 specific transcription factor GATA-3 can also affect type I NKT cell development. Aside from transcription factors, SLAM-associated protein (SAP) signaling pathway can also selectively control expansion and differentiation of type I NKT cell. Type I NKT cells have been shown to respond to both self and foreign α and β linked glycosphingolipids (GSL), ceramides, and phospholipids. Type I NKT cells have been reported to mostly aid in mounting an effective immune response against tumor.
Type II NKT Cells
Type II NKT cells also called diverse or variant NKT cells, are CD1d-restricted T cells that express more diverse alpha-beta TCRs and do not recognize α-GalCer. Type II NKT cells are major subset in humans with higher frequency as compared to type I NKT cells. Due to absence of specific markers and agonistic antigens to identify all type II NKT cells, characterization of these cells has been challenging. Different methodologies employed to characterize type II NKT cells include, comparing immune responses between Jα18−/− (lacking only type I NKT) and CD1d−/− (lacking both type I and type II NKT) mice, using 24 αβ TCR transgenic mice (that overexpresses Vα3.2/Vβ9 TCR from type II NKT cell hybridoma VIII24), using a Jα18-deficient IL-4 reporter mouse model, staining with antigen-loaded CD1d tetramer and asses binding to type II NKT hybridomas [reviewed in Ref.]. The first major antigen identified for self-glycolipid reactive type II NKT cells in mice was myelin derived glycolipid sulfatide. Subsequently, sulfatide and lysosulfatide reactive CD1d-restricted human type II NKT cells have been reported. Sulfatide specific type II NKT cells predominantly exhibit an oligoclonal TCR repertoire (V α 3/V α 1-J α 7/J α 9 and V β 8.1/V β 3.1-J β 2.7). Other self-glycolipids such as β GlcCer and β GalCer have been shown to activate murine type II NKT cells. Our group recently reported that two major sphingolipids accumulated in Gaucher disease (GD), β-glucosylceramide (β GlcCer) and its deacylated product glucosylsphingosine, are recognized by murine and human type II NKT cells. In an earlier study, we have also shown that lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), lysophospholipid markedly upregulated in myeloma patients was an antigen for human type II NKT cells. Type II NKT cells can be distinguished from type I NKT cells by their predominance in humans versus mice, TCR binding and distinct antigen specificities. Crystal structures of type II NKT TCR-sulfatide/CD1d complex and type I NKT TCR-α-GalCer/CD1d complex provided insights into the mechanisms by which NKT TCRs recognize antigen. The type I NKT TCR was found to bind α-GalCer/CD1d complex in a rigid, parallel configuration mainly involving the α-chain. The key residues within the CDR2β, CDR3α, and CDR1α loops of the semi-iTCR of type I NKT cells were determined to be involved in the detection of the α-GalCer/CD1d complex. On the other hand, type II NKT TCRs contact their ligands primarily via their CDR3β loop rather than CDR3 α loops in an antiparallel fashion very similar to binding observed in some of the conventional MHC-restricted T cells. Ternary structure of sulfatide-reactive TCR molecules revealed that CDR3 α loop primarily contacted CD1d and the CDR3β determined the specificity of sulfatide antigen. The flexibility in binding of type II NKT TCR to its antigens akin to TCR–peptide–MHC complex resonates with its greater TCR diversity and ability to respond to wide range of ligands. However, despite striking difference between the two subsets, similarities among the two subsets have also been reported. For example, both type I and type II NKT cells are autoreactive and depend on the transcriptional regulator PLZF and SAP for their development. Although, many type II NKT cells seem to have activated/memory phenotype like type I NKT cells, in other studies including ours, a subset of type II NKT cells also displayed naïve T cell phenotype (CD45RA+, CD45RO−, CD62high, and CD69−/low). Type II NKT cell is activated mainly by TCR signaling following recognition of lipid/CD1d complex independent of either TLR signaling or presence of IL-12.
In tumor and autoimmune disease models, type II NKT cells are typically associated with immunosuppression.
How Do NKT Cell Target Tumor Cells?
Several clues exist attributing a significant role of type I NKT cells in mediating protective immune response against tumors. Decreased frequency and function of type I NKT cells in the peripheral blood of different cancer patients is suggestive of their role in effective antitumor immunity. Increased frequency of peripheral blood type I NKT cells in cancer patients predicts a more favorable response to therapy. Furthermore, recent studies found an association between number of tumor-infiltrating NKTs with better clinical outcome. Notably, α-GalCer, the prototypic NKT ligand, was first discovered in a screen for antitumor agents. Many studies using genetic knockouts and murine models of tumor have been useful to discern the role of NKT cells in malignancy. Type I NKT cells can lead to effective antitumor immunity by three mechanisms: (a) direct tumor lysis, (b) recruitment and activation of other innate and adaptive immune cells by initiating Th1 cytokine cascade, and (c) regulating immunosuppressive cells in TME (Figure 1).
Direct Cytotoxicity Against Tumor Cells
Natural killer T cells can eliminate CD1d-expressing transformed cells by direct cytolysis using either perforin, granzyme B, Fas ligand (FasL), or TNF-α-mediated cytotoxic pathways. Tumor cells expressing CD1d are mainly of myelomonocytic and B-cell lineages origin, and very few solid tumors have also been found to be CD1d-positive. Surface expression of CD1d on tumor cells is assumed to directly correlate with NKT cell-mediated cytotoxicity. With higher expression of CD1d, resulting in higher tumor cell lysis and thereby lower metastasis rates, while lack of CD1d expression in tumors leads to their escape from recognition by NKT cells, and tumor progression in some models. These studies postulate that loss or downregulation of surface expression of CD1d favors tumor survival and permits tumor escape from NKT cell-mediated immunosurveillance. This concept is further strengthened by observations that downregulation of CD1d in human breast cancer and multiple Myeloma correlated with increased metastatic potential and disease progression. Similarly, downregulation of CD1d by human papillomavirus in infected cervical epithelial cells was linked to their progression to cervical carcinoma. Another means by which tumor cells escape NKT cell-mediated antitumor response was shown in a mouse model of lymphoma, where shedding of tumor-associated glycolipids was shown to inhibit CD1-mediated presentation to NKT cells. Interestingly, in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), CD1d expression was found to increase during disease progression, counteracting the suggested role of CD1d as an anti-survival factor in cancer. However, a recent study has shown that higher CD1d expression on CLL cells associated with disease progression actually led to impairment in both function and numbers of type I NKT cells. CD1d independent cytotoxic effect of NKT cells on various hematopoietic tumor cell lines have also been reported. Although, the mechanisms or tumor specific CD1d—glycolipid complex that helps NKT cells recognize and kill only CD1d-positive tumor cells and not normal cells is still enigmatic. Membrane glycolipids especially GSL such as globotriaosyl-ceramide (Gb3Cer/CD77), gangliosides (GD2, GD3, and GM2) have been shown to be overexpressed and altered in a range of cancers compared to normal tissue. Shedding of some of the gangliosides and GSL into the TME have also been reported. Recognition of these overexpressed GSL and gangliosides on the surface of tumor cells may lead to differential recognition and killing of tumor cells by NKT cells.
Cytokine-Mediated Modulations of Effector Cells
In addition to direct tumor lysis, type I NKT cells can activate and recruit both innate and adaptive immune cells, such as DCs, NK cells, B cells, and T cells through rapid secretion of cytokines on activation. This is underscored by the observed increase in NK cells, CD8+ T cells and macrophages among tumor-infiltrating leukocytes brought about by α-GalCer injection. Owing to partially activated state and the presence of preformed cytosolic mRNA for various cytokines, type I NKT cells can rapidly produce broad spectrum of Th1 and Th2 cytokines on activation. The nature and magnitude of the type I NKT cell cytokine response is contingent on a number of variables that include the glycolipid antigen, subsets of NKT, and tissue location. For example, while α-GalCer-activated type I NKT cell primarily elicits an IFN-γ, a synthetic analog of α-GalCer with a truncated lipid chain OCH elicits majorly elicits IL-4 production. Further, DN liver subset of type I NKT was found to confer protection as compared to CD4+ liver subset or IL-4 inducing thymic type I NKT cells in MCA-induced fibrosarcoma model. Type I NKT cells play a crucial role in induction of early immune responses to tumor by influencing DC maturation. Mostly DCs found in TME are immature and inept at activating specific T cells. Maturation and differentiation of DCs is important in shaping the magnitude and polarization of T cell-mediated response. A mutually costimulatory interaction between DC and type I NKT cells ensues following encounter with CD1d/antigen complexes displayed by immature DCs. Ligation of APC-expressed CD40 with upregulated CD40L on type I NKT cells induces DCs’ maturation with higher surface expression of MHC class II, the costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, CD86, CD70 and the endocytic receptor DEC205 and potent IL-12 production. Sustained IL-12 secretion by mature DCs induces IFN-γ production by NKT cells. Mature DCs reciprocally enhance expression of CD40L and IL-12 receptor on type I NKT cells providing a strong feed forward signal that amplifies IFN-γ responses. Ligation of chemokine receptor CXCR6 on the surface of type I NKT cells by its ligand CXCL16 expressed on APCs can also provide costimulatory signal resulting in robust α-GalCer-induced type I NKT activation. α-GalCer-induced type I NKT cells can provide cognate licensing for cross-priming CD8 alpha + DCs to produce CCL17, which attracts CCR4+CD8+ T cells for subsequent activation. Presence of phenotypic maturation ligands, suitable cytokines (IFN-γ), other functional immunostimulatory factors on type I NKT licensed DC can induce activation of CD8 T cells and their polarization toward antitumor effector function. Release of various cytokines such as IL-2, IL-12, and IFN-γ by type I NKT cells leads to activation and expansion of NK cells into lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells. These LAK cells upregulate the effectors or adhesion molecules such as perforin, NKp44, granzymes, FasL, and TRAIL and secrete IFN-γ to adhere and lyse tumor cells. Type I NKT cells can form bidirectional interactions with B cells, wherein B cells can present lipid antigens to type I NKT cells through CD1d and NKT cells can license B cells to effectively prime and activate antitumor CTL responses and can also directly provide B cell help to enhance and sustain humoral response.
Altering the Effects of Immunosuppressive Cells in TME
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are prominent immunosuppressive immune cells present in the TME. TAMs contribute to tumor progression by enhancing angiogenesis, tumor cell invasion, suppression of NK, and T cell responses. Type I NKT cells were found to co-localize with CD1d-expressing TAMs in neuroblastoma and kill TAMs in an IL-15 and CD1d-restricted manner. Besides TAMs, type I NKTs can alter the effects of CD1d+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)-mediated immune suppression. MDSCs are heterogeneous population of cells of myeloid origin, which often accumulate during tumor growth and contribute to immune escape and tumor progression. In a model of influenza A viral infection, adoptive transfer of type I NKTs inhibited arginase 1 and nitrous oxide synthase-mediated suppressive activity of MDSCs. The ability of type I NKT cells to abolish the suppressive activity of MDSCs was found to be dependent on CD1d and CD40 interactions. In a tumor model, α-GalCer-loaded MDSCs facilitate conversion of immature MDSCs to mature APCs capable of eliciting cytotoxic NK and T cell immune response against cancer cells. De Santo et al. reported type I NKT cell-mediated reversal of immunosuppressive activity of neutrophils in melanoma, serum amyloid A1 (SAA-1) derived as consequence of tumor-associated inflammation induced differentiation of IL-10-producing neutrophils causing suppression of antigen-specific T cell responses. Conversely, SAA-1 also enhanced CD1d-CD40 dependent interaction between the suppressive neutrophils and type I NKT cells. This crosstalk lead to dephosphorylation of Erk, p38, and phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase, which in turn lead to inhibition of IL-10 secretion and promotion of IL-12 production by neutrophils, reinstating the proliferation of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells.
Suppression of Tumor Immunity by Type II NKT Cells
In contrast to the established protective role of type I NKT in most murine tumor models, type II NKT cells have been shown to possess a more suppressive/regulatory role in tumor immunity. Comparison of antitumor response in Jα18-deficient mice (which lack only type I NKT) with CD1d deficient mice (which lack both type I and II NKT cell) revealed that type II NKT cells were responsible for suppression of antitumor responses in several murine tumor models. Furthermore, sulfatide-reactive type II NKT cells was shown to antagonize the protective antitumor immune responses mounted by α-GalCer-stimulated type I NKT cells. Sulfatide activated murine type II NKT cells were reported to inhibit proinflammatory functions of type I NKT cells, conventional T cells and DCs and also induce tolerization of myeloid DCs. A major attribute of type II NKT-mediated suppression of tumor immunity is elevated production of IL-13 and IL-4 cytokines capable of skewing the cytokine response predominantly toward tumor-promoting Th2 type. In a mouse model of transformed recurrent fibrosarcoma, type II NKT cells was shown to suppress cytotoxic T cells through IL-13 production via IL4R and STAT6 axis and also induce MDSCs producing immunosuppressive cytokine TGF-β. Similarly, LPC reactive type II NKT cells have been shown to preferentially produce IL-13 and exhibit immunoregulatory role in myeloma patients. Concentration of LPC, a phospholipid associated with inflammation, was found to be elevated in myeloma sera. Progressive myeloma disease is associated with a decline as well as dysfunctional activation of type I NKT cells and increased frequency of type II NKT cells. The preferential production of IL-13, a cytokine implicated in promoting tumor growth, by LPC specific type II NKT cells suggests their role in disease progression. Recently, we have shown a possible implication of type II NKT cells in the development of B-cell malignancies associated with GD. GD is uniquely associated with increased cancer risk particularly with multiple myeloma. GD is a lysosomal storage disorder caused due to an inherited deficiency of the acidic β-glucosidase enzyme, resulting in marked accumulation of β-glucosylceramide (β GlcCer) and its deacylated product, glucosylsphingosine (LGL1). Increased frequency of LGL1-specific type II NKT cells with reduced frequency of type I NKT cells was observed in murine model and patients of GD. Interestingly, LGL1 reactive type II NKT cells demonstrated follicular helper T cell phenotype and were able to provide help to germinal center B cells to produce lipid-reactive antibodies. In both patients and mice with GD having monoclonal gammopathy, the monoclonal immunoglobulin was found to be reactive to Gaucher lipids. Though studies described earlier hint to pro- and antitumor functional dichotomy between type I and type II NKT, respectively, there are several emerging evidences challenging this paradigm, and the pro/antitumor roles of these cells may be context or activation-dependent. While type I NKT cells have been shown to assume immune-suppressive role in several tumor settings, a recent study showed that CpG-activated type II NKT cells secreted IFN-γ rather than IL-13, which in turn enhanced the activation and function of CD8+ T cells and contributed to the antitumor effect of CpG in the B16 melanoma model.
Preclinical Studies
There are several theoretical advantages for harnessing type I NKT cells against cancer. NKT cell can simultaneously target both MHC positive and negative tumor cells due to ability to activate both antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and NK cells. Second, type I NKT cells show strong adjuvant activity thereby activating both innate and adaptive immune cells. Finally, NKT cells have the ability to convert immature and or tolerogenic DCs found in tumor bed into mature DCs capable of initiating tumor specific CD8+ T cell response. However, major limitations in targeting NKT cell for tumor treatment are the cancer-mediated reversible defect in the number and function of type I NKT cells. Circulating type I NKT cell deficiency leads to decreased proliferation and IFN-γ production by type I NKT cells, consequently skewing immune response to a pro-tumor Th2 cytokine profile. In line with this observation, reduced type I NKT cell frequency was shown to correlate with poor survival, while increased type I NKT cell numbers capable of making IFN-γ have positive prognostic value for survival in cancer patients. To restore the numbers and function of type I NKT cells in cancer patients and murine models, several approaches like administration of α-GalCer either alone or with IL-12, administration of APCs (DC or irradiated tumor cells) with α-GalCer, adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded and/or activated type I NKT cells, and finally a combination of α-GalCer with antibodies or fusion proteins have been exploited. Data from numerous studies on variety of experimental and spontaneous murine tumor models have shown significant role for NKT cells in launching of powerful antitumor immune responses (Table 1).
Type I NKT cells were shown to be indispensable in mediating IL-12-mediated antitumor effects in low- and moderate-dose IL-12 treatment models. IL-12 was found to activate the NKT cell-mediated lysis of tumor cells and also induce IFN-γ production by type I NKT cells. Administration of soluble α-GalCer leads to activation and expansion of type I NKT cells, creating a milieu of immune-stimulatory cytokines including IFN-γ and costimulatory molecules, resulting in maturation of host APC thus enhancing antitumor T cell response. IFN-γ production by type I NKT cell was found to be pivotal in inducing NK cell activation, proliferation of memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell effector functions, and inhibiting angiogenesis, all contributing to effective immune response against tumor. One of the major drawbacks of administering soluble free α-GalCer is that it causes type I NKT cell to adopt an anergic state causing unresponsiveness to sequential stimulation with α-GalCer. To circumvent this problem, mice were administrated DCs loaded with either α-GalCer alone or in combination with tumor antigens. α-GalCer-pulsed APCs induced a more prolonged cytokine response as well as powerful antitumor immune response than α-Galcer alone. Another recent immunotherapeutic approach has been to load autologous irradiated tumors, which act as source of tumor antigens with α-GalCer. A big improvement of this approach is CD1d-mediated cross-presentation of endogenous glycolipids and or α-GalCer from tumor cells to NKT cells, leading to DC maturation and consequently effective long-term T cell resistance to the tumor. Another approach involved adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded and or activated type I NKT cells to restore type I NKT cell numbers in preclinical models of melanoma and lymphoid neoplasms. This approach has been shown to be more effective compared to the i.v. administration of α-GalCer. Finally, combination therapy using monoclonal Abs targeting CD1d alone or in combination with tumor cell death inducing and immunomodulating mAbs has emerged as promising immunotherapeutic candidate against CD1d-negative cancers. Stirnemann and Corgnac et al. attempted to target α-GalCer to tumor site by using constructs consisting of either α-GalCer/CD1d molecules alone or fused to tumor Ag specific scFv fragments in a colon carcinoma and murine melanoma model, respectively, and reported specific tumor localization of type I NKT activating potent antitumor responses compared to α-GalCer alone. Preclinical studies obtained using chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) with engineered type I NKT cells have yielded promising result. CAR-bearing type I NKT cells effectively localized to the tumor sites, eliminating tumor cells, and exhibited potent and specific cytotoxicity against TAMs without producing graft-versus-host disease. Recently, CD62L+CD19−specific CAR-engineered NKT cells have been shown to possess superior therapeutic activity in a B-cell lymphoma model.
Clinical Trials of NKT Cells
Based on the preponderance of data from preclinical mice models, showing that activation of type I NKT cells plays a substantial role in providing protection against tumor growth and metastasis of several tumors, different clinical trials have been initiated to harness NKT cell’s antitumor potential (Table 2). However, while direct administration of soluble α-GalCer in cancer patients was well tolerated, it failed to yield any clinical response. Potential reasons for the low efficacy in human trials could be attributed to insufficient drug delivery, inter-individual variability and very low type I NKT cell numbers at baseline, induction of anergy or regulatory IL-10-producing type I NKT cells. To overcome these limitations of soluble α-GalCer administration and improve NKT-mediated antitumor responses, multiple clinical trials were performed using autologous α-GalCer-pulsed APCs in patients with advanced and recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Table 2). Different types of APCs and alternative routes to efficiently target activated NKT cells directly to cancer region were optimized to achieve objective antitumor responses. Though promising, this strategy too suffers from certain caveats like the treatment is again dependent on the baseline NKT levels, which are inevitably low in most cancer patients. Second, it is difficult to obtain large number of autologous monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs) from immune suppressed cancer patients and also cumbersome for ex vivo generation of DCs in compliance with good manufacturing practices regulations. Another strategy involves adoptive transfer of in vitro-expanded autologous type I NKT populations. Clinical trials using this approach in non-small cell lung cancer and advanced melanoma do show increase in type I NKT expansion and elevated serum IFN-γ levels in vivo; however, further optimization of the protocols and perhaps combination approaches such as combining with immune checkpoint blockade may be needed to obtain a significant clinical response. Remarkably, combining activated type I NKT cells and α-GalCer-pulsed APCs has been reported to enhance the low antitumor response observed with monotherapy employing either NKT or APCs alone in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Similarly, combining regimen of α-GalCer-pulsed DCs and the immune-modulatory drug lenalidomide in treating multiple myeloma patients leads to type I NKT expansion with downstream activation of NK, monocytes and decrease in tumor-associated M spikes.
Adoptive Transfer of Type I NKT Cells
Advanced cancer patients with low NKT cell numbers may benefit from development of in vitro methods for generation of large numbers of functional NKT cells which can be further used for adoptive transfers. NKT cells have been generated from CD34+ cells isolated from cord blood using IL-15 and stem cell factor (flt-3 ligand) in liquid culture system. Watarai et al. successfully differentiated murine induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into functional NKT cells in vitro that secreted large amounts of Th1 cytokine IFN-γ acting as adjuvant and antitumor agent. Recently, protocol to generate human type I NKT cells in vitro from iPSC that are competent in eliciting antitumor activity has been generated. Human type I NKT cells can also be reprogrammed to pluripotency followed by redifferentiation back to type I NKT cells in vitro using an IL-7/IL-15-based cytokine combination. The immunological features of re-differentiated type I NKT cells and their unlimited availability from iPSCs offer a potentially effective immunotherapy against cancer. Functionally mature human NKT cells have been also generated from bone marrow-derived adult hematopoietic stem-progenitor cells by expansion with CD1d-Ig-based artificial-presenting cells. Owing to the feasibility of producing large quantities of competent NKT cells, stem cell-derived type I NKT cells offer a promising strategy for effective anticancer immunotherapy.
Alternate Ligands
As discussed earlier, while α-GalCer is a potent activator of type I NKT cells, α-GalCer suffers from few drawback that limits its use as effective cancer immunotherapeutic. For example, α-GalCer induces anergy in type I NKT cells. This has led to preclinical exploration of several alternate ligands that are now poised to enter the clinic. Synthetic glycolipids or α-GalCer analogs chemically modified to induce more precise and predictable cytokine profile than α-GalCer have been synthesized and tested. These analogs as compared α-GalCer, show superior anticancer immunity in tumor mouse models and therefore hold great potential as an alternative vaccine adjuvant. As compared to α-GalCer, alternative non-glycosidic type I NKT-cell agonist threitol ceramide promoted stronger activation of human and mouse type I NKT cells and stronger antitumor responses in comparison to α-GalCer, making it potential candidate for NKT cell-based clinical trials. Another interesting prospect is encapsulating α-GalCer or other lipids in nanoparticle carriers or liposomes decorated with Abs or ligands to target specific APCs. These approaches have several advantages like slower release of α-GalCer, specific targeting of APC subset, lower amounts of α-GalCer required to activate NKT cells than soluble α-GalCer. Positive therapeutic effect of α-GalCer-loaded octa-arginine modified liposomes was reported in melanoma murine model. Administration of α-GalCer and ovalbumin coencapsulated PLGA nanoparticles provided significant prophylactic and therapeutic responses in mouse melanoma model by enhancing activation and tumor infiltration of the antigen-specific CD8+ T cell.
Combination Approaches
A major limitation of the initial studies targeting NKT cells in cancer is that these studies were conducted using single agent strategies and did not account for blockade of immune checkpoints or other immune-suppressive factors. PD-1:PD-L pathway has been shown to play an important role in mediating αGalCer-induced anergy in NKT cells. Antibody-mediated blockade of PD-1:PD-L interactions at the time of α-GalCer treatment prevent the induction of type I NKT anergy and also enhance the antitumor activities of αGalCer. Therefore, combination of NKT-targeted therapies with PD-1:PD-L blockade should be considered. Synthetic lipopeptide vaccines based on conjugation of MHC-binding peptide epitopes to α-GalCer displayed promising antitumor activity in a melanoma model. The principle behind these vaccines is to simultaneously provide both adjuvant and antigen to the same cell in a controlled fashion. Application of this vaccine technology using different tumor antigens might serve as a novel strategy for diverse malignancies. Combination of type I NKT-targeted DC vaccine with low dose of lenalidomide led to promising clinical activity in myeloma. Therefore, there is an unmet need to pursue combination approaches targeting type I NKT cells to better harness the antitumor properties of type I NKT cells in the clinic.
Concluding Remarks
Natural killer T cells are an important component of the TME and play key roles in regulating antitumor immunity. Although preclinical studies with NKT cell-targeted therapies in murine tumor models have been positive, clinical translation of these results has proven challenging. Translational challenge could be attributed to incomplete knowledge of human NKT subsets. Generation of improved preclinical models that replicate human NKT cell response is needed to gain insights into the cross talk between APCs and NKT subsets and to improve the efficacy of NKT cell-targeting therapies.
Author Contributions
Both SN and MVD participated in conceptualization and drafting of the article as well as critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. Both authors gave final approval of the submitted publication.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References 235
- 1.
Gajewski TF Schreiber H Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat Immunol (2013 ) 14:1014–22.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.2703
- 2.
Marcus A Gowen BG Thompson TW Iannello A Ardolino M Deng W Recognition of tumors by the innate immune system and natural killer cells. Adv Immunol (2014 ) 122:91–128.
Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-800267-4.00003-1
- 3.
McEwen-Smith RM Salio M Cerundolo V The regulatory role of invariant NKT cells in tumor immunity. Cancer Immunol Res (2015 ) 3:425–35.
Not in our library10.1158/2326-6066.cir-15-0062
- 4.
Terabe M Berzofsky JA. The role of NKT cells in tumor immunity. Adv Cancer Res (2008 ) 101:277–348.
Not in our library10.1016/s0065-230x(08)00408-9
- 5.
Robertson FC Berzofsky JA Terabe M NKT cell networks in the regulation of tumor immunity. Front Immunol (2014 ) 5:543
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2014.00543
- 6.
Bendelac A Savage PB Teyton L. The biology of NKT cells. Annu Rev Immunol (2007 ) 25:297–336.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141711
- 7.
Godfrey DI Pellicci DG Patel O Kjer-Nielsen L Mccluskey J Rossjohn J Antigen recognition by CD1d-restricted NKT T cell receptors. Semin Immunol (2010 ) 22:61–7.
Not in our library10.1016/j.smim.2009.10.004
- 8.
Brennan PJ Brigl M Brenner MB. Invariant natural killer T cells: an innate activation scheme linked to diverse effector functions. Nat Rev Immunol (2013 ) 13:101–17.
Not in our library10.1038/nri3369
- 9.
Salio M Silk JD Jones EY Cerundolo V. Biology of CD1- and MR1-restricted T cells. Annu Rev Immunol (2014 ) 32:323–66.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120243
- 10.
Berzins SP Uldrich AP Pellicci DG Mcnab F Hayakawa Y Smyth MJ Parallels and distinctions between T and NKT cell development in the thymus. Immunol Cell Biol (2004 ) 82:269–75.
Not in our library10.1111/j.0818-9641.2004.01256.x
- 11.
Godfrey DI Uldrich AP Mccluskey J Rossjohn J Moody DB. The burgeoning family of unconventional T cells. Nat Immunol (2015 ) 16:1114–23.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.3298
- 12.
Cohen NR Brennan PJ Shay T Watts GF Brigl M Kang J Shared and distinct transcriptional programs underlie the hybrid nature of iNKT cells. Nat Immunol (2013 ) 14:90–9.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.2490
- 13.
Kohlgruber AC Donado CA Lamarche NM Brenner MB Brennan PJ. Activation strategies for invariant natural killer T cells. Immunogenetics (2016 ) 68:649–63.
Not in our library10.1007/s00251-016-0944-8
- 14.
Fan X Rudensky AY. Hallmarks of tissue-resident lymphocytes. Cell (2016 ) 164:1198–211.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.048
- 15.
Kawano T Cui J Koezuka Y Toura I Kaneko Y Motoki K CD1d-restricted and TCR-mediated activation of valpha14 NKT cells by glycosylceramides. Science (1997 ) 278:1626–9.
Not in our library10.1126/science.278.5343.1626
- 16.
Kronenberg M Gapin L The unconventional lifestyle of NKT cells. Nat Rev Immunol (2002 ) 2:557–68.
Not in our library10.1038/nri854
- 17.
Godfrey DI Hammond KJ Poulton LD Smyth MJ Baxter AG. NKT cells: facts, functions and fallacies. Immunol Today (2000 ) 21:573–83.
Not in our library10.1016/s0167-5699(00)01735-7
- 18.
Bedel R Matsuda JL Brigl M White J Kappler J Marrack P Lower TCR repertoire diversity in Traj18-deficient mice. Nat Immunol (2012 ) 13:705–6.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.2347
- 19.
Chandra S Zhao M Budelsky A De Mingo Pulido A Day J Fu Z A new mouse strain for the analysis of invariant NKT cell function. Nat Immunol (2015 ) 16:799–800.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.3203
- 20.
Bendelac A Killeen N Littman DR Schwartz RH. A subset of CD4+ thymocytes selected by MHC class I molecules. Science (1994 ) 263:1774–8.
Not in our library10.1126/science.7907820
- 21.
Gadola SD Dulphy N Salio M Cerundolo V. Valpha24-JalphaQ-independent, CD1d-restricted recognition of alpha-galactosylceramide by human CD4(+) and CD8alphabeta(+) T lymphocytes. J Immunol (2002 ) 168:5514–20.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.168.11.5514
- 22.
Gumperz JE Miyake S Yamamura T Brenner MB. Functionally distinct subsets of CD1d-restricted natural killer T cells revealed by CD1d tetramer staining. J Exp Med (2002 ) 195:625–36.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20011786
- 23.
Lee H Hong C Shin J Oh S Jung S Park YK The presence of CD8+ invariant NKT cells in mice. Exp Mol Med (2009 ) 41:866–72.
Not in our library10.3858/emm.2009.41.12.092
- 24.
Lee PT Benlagha K Teyton L Bendelac A. Distinct functional lineages of human V(alpha)24 natural killer T cells. J Exp Med (2002 ) 195:637–41.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20011908
- 25.
Arrenberg P Halder R Kumar V. Cross-regulation between distinct natural killer T cell subsets influences immune response to self and foreign antigens. J Cell Physiol (2009 ) 218:246–50.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.21597
- 26.
Jahng AW Maricic I Pedersen B Burdin N Naidenko O Kronenberg M Activation of natural killer T cells potentiates or prevents experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med (2001 ) 194:1789–99.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.194.12.1789
- 27.
Godfrey DI Stankovic S Baxter AG Raising the NKT cell family. Nat Immunol (2010 ) 11:197–206.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.1841
- 28.
Wu L Van Kaer L Natural killer T cells and autoimmune disease. Curr Mol Med (2009 ) 9:4–14.
Not in our library10.2174/156652409787314534
- 29.
Constantinides MG Bendelac A. Transcriptional regulation of the NKT cell lineage. Curr Opin Immunol (2013 ) 25:161–7.
Not in our library10.1016/j.coi.2013.01.003
- 30.
Coquet JM Chakravarti S Kyparissoudis K Mcnab FW Pitt LA Mckenzie BS Diverse cytokine production by NKT cell subsets and identification of an IL-17-producing CD4-NK1.1- NKT cell population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008 ) 105:11287–92.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0801631105
- 31.
Lee YJ Wang H Starrett GJ Phuong V Jameson SC Hogquist KA. Tissue-specific distribution of iNKT cells impacts their cytokine response. Immunity (2015 ) 43:566–78.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.025
- 32.
Das R Sant’Angelo DB Nichols KE. Transcriptional control of invariant NKT cell development. Immunol Rev (2010 ) 238:195–215.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-065x.2010.00962.x
- 33.
Kovalovsky D Uche OU Eladad S Hobbs RM Yi W Alonzo E The BTB-zinc finger transcriptional regulator PLZF controls the development of invariant natural killer T cell effector functions. Nat Immunol (2008 ) 9:1055–64.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.1641
- 34.
Savage AK Constantinides MG Han J Picard D Martin E Li B The transcription factor PLZF directs the effector program of the NKT cell lineage. Immunity (2008 ) 29:391–403.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2008.07.011
- 35.
Dose M Sleckman BP Han J Bredemeyer AL Bendelac A Gounari F. Intrathymic proliferation wave essential for Valpha14+ natural killer T cell development depends on c-Myc. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009 ) 106:8641–6.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0812255106
- 36.
Mycko MP Ferrero I Wilson A Jiang W Bianchi T Trumpp A Selective requirement for c-Myc at an early stage of V(alpha)14i NKT cell development. J Immunol (2009 ) 182:4641–8.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0803394
- 37.
Michel ML Mendes-Da-Cruz D Keller AC Lochner M Schneider E Dy M Critical role of ROR-gammat in a new thymic pathway leading to IL-17-producing invariant NKT cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008 ) 105:19845–50.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0806472105
- 38.
Hu T Simmons A Yuan J Bender TP Alberola-ILA J. The transcription factor c-Myb primes CD4+CD8+ immature thymocytes for selection into the iNKT lineage. Nat Immunol (2010 ) 11:435–41.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.1865
- 39.
Choi HJ Geng Y Cho H Li S Giri PK Felio K Differential requirements for the ETS transcription factor ELF-1 in the development of NKT cells and NK cells. Blood (2011 ) 117:1880–7.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2010-09-309468
- 40.
Egawa T Eberl G Taniuchi I Benlagha K Geissmann F Hennighausen L Genetic evidence supporting selection of the Valpha14i NKT cell lineage from double-positive thymocyte precursors. Immunity (2005 ) 22:705–16.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2005.03.011
Cited by papers we hold 8
- Machine learning-based identification of tumor-infiltrating immune cell-associated lncRNAs for improving outcomes and immunotherapy responses in patients with low-grade glioma · 2022No notice
- New Insights Into the Cancer–Microbiome–Immune Axis: Decrypting a Decade of Discoveries · 2021No notice
- Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (third edition) · 2021No notice
- Wnt Signaling in the Regulation of Immune Cell and Cancer Therapeutics · 2019No notice
- Natural killer T cell activation increases iNOS+CD206- M1 macrophage and controls the growth of solid tumor · 2019No notice
- Complex Network of NKT Cell Subsets Controls Immune Homeostasis in Liver and Gut · 2018Not checked
- The Role of Natural Killer T Cells in Cancer—A Phenotypical and Functional Approach · 2018No notice
- Natural Killer T Cells: An Ecological Evolutionary Developmental Biology Perspective · 2017Not checked
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.