Genetically Predicted Longer Telomere Length May Reduce Risk of Hip Osteoarthritis

Objective: This two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study aimed to examine the potential causal association of telomere length (TL) with the risk of osteoarthritis (OA).Method: The summary-level data for OA was derived from the United Kingdom Biobank cohort, including 50,508 individuals of European descent. Eighteen single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with TL were identified as instrumental variables from the most up-to-date TL genome-wide association study (GWAS) involving over 78,592 individuals of European descent. Based on the GWASs data, MR was performed using established statistical analysis methods including the inverse variance weighted, weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier.Results: Genetically determined TL was not associated with the risk of total OA (IVW odds ratio [OR] = 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83, 1.21). In subgroup analyses stratified by OA site, no evidence in favor of association between genetically determined TL and knee OA was found (IVW OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.89, 1.58). However, using WM method, we observed a limited protective effect of longer TL on the risk of hip OA (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.36–0.99), whereas the results of the IVW (p = 0.931) and MR-PRESSO (p = 0.932) showed that TL had no effect on hip OA.Conclusions: This study does not support a causal association between TL and total OA. A potential protective association between longer TL and hip OA, though possible, remains less certain.

Abstract licence: CC BY

1. 7.

   Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression · 2015

2. 9.

   A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization · 2015

3. 11.

   Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator · 2016

4. 12.

   Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants · 2017

5. 15.

   Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique · 2016

6. 16.

   MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data · 2017

7. 17.
   Corrected

   Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method · 2017

8. 26.

   Meta‐analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review · 2019

9. 28.

   Genome-wide Association Analysis in Humans Links Nucleotide Metabolism to Leukocyte Telomere Length · 2020

25 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.