Sharing social media data: The role of past experiences, attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control

Social media data (SMD) have become an important data source in the social sciences. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the experiences and practices of researchers working with SMD in their research and gain insights into researchers' sharing behavior and influencing factors for their decisions. To achieve these aims, we conducted a survey study among researchers working with SMD. The questionnaire covered different topics related to accessing, (re)using, and sharing SMD. To examine attitudes toward data sharing, perceived subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, we used questions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). We employed a combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses. The results of the qualitative analysis show that the main reasons for not sharing SMD were that sharing was not considered or needed, as well as legal and ethical challenges. The quantitative analyses reveal that there are differences in the relative importance of past sharing and reuse experiences, experienced challenges, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control as predictors of future SMD sharing intentions, depending on the way the data should be shared (publicly, with restricted access, or upon personal request). Importantly, the TPB variables have predictive power for all types of SMD sharing.

Abstract licence: CC BY

1. 13.

   Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate · 2007

2. 14.

   Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals · 2009

3. 19.

   Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions · 2011

4. 23.

   Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide · 2015

5. 30.

   The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship · 2016

6. 35.

   What Drives Academic Data Sharing? · 2015

34 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.