Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Deep Learning for Cardiac Image Segmentation: A Review

Chen Chen, Chen Qin, Huaqi Qiu and 4 more

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fcvm.2020.00025

Abstract

Deep learning has become the most widely used approach for cardiac image segmentation in recent years. In this paper, we provide a review of over 100 cardiac image segmentation papers using deep learning, which covers common imaging modalities including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound and major anatomical structures of interest (ventricles, atria, and vessels). In addition, a summary of publicly available cardiac image datasets and code repositories are included to provide a base for encouraging reproducible research. Finally, we discuss the challenges and limitations with current deep learning-based approaches (scarcity of labels, model generalizability across different domains, interpretability) and suggest potential directions for future research.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 257

  1. 1.

    Petitjean C Zuluaga MA Bai W Dacher JN Grosgeorge D Caudron J. Right ventricle segmentation from cardiac MRI: a collation study. Med Image Anal. (2015 ) 19:187–202.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2014.10.004

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Tavakoli V Amini AA A survey of shaped-based registration and segmentation techniques for cardiac images. Comput Vis Image Understand. (2013 ) 117:966–89.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cviu.2012.11.017

  4. 4.

    Lesage D Angelini ED Bloch I Funka-Lea G. A review of 3D vessel lumen segmentation techniques: models, features and extraction schemes. Med Image Anal. (2009 ) 13:819–45.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2009.07.011

  5. 5.

    Greenspan H Van Ginneken B Summers RM Guest editorial deep learning in medical imaging: overview and future promise of an exciting new technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2016 ) 35:1153–9.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2016.2553401

  6. 6.

    Shen D Wu G Suk HI. Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. (2017 ) 19:221–48.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442

  7. 7.

    Litjens G Kooi T Bejnordi BE Setio AAA Ciompi F Ghafoorian M. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. (2017 ) 42:60–88.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005

  8. 8.

    Gandhi S Mosleh W Shen J Chow CM. Automation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence in echocardiography: a brave new world. Echocardiography. (2018 ) 35:1402–18.

    Not in our library10.1111/echo.14086

  9. 9.

    Mazurowski MA Buda M Saha A Bashir MR. Deep learning in radiology: an overview of the concepts and a survey of the state of the art with focus on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. (2019 ) 49:939–54.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmri.26534

  10. 10.

    Andreopoulos A Tsotsos JK. Efficient and generalizable statistical models of shape and appearance for analysis of cardiac MRI. Med Image Anal. (2008 ) 12:335–57.. Data source: http://www.cse.yorku.ca/~mridataset/

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2007.12.003

  11. 11.

    Radau P Lu Y Connelly K Paul G Dick AJ Wright GA Evaluation framework for algorithms segmenting short axis cardiac MRI. MIDAS J. (2009 ) 49 Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/10380/3070. Data source: http://www.cardiacatlas.org/studies/sunnybrook-cardiac-data/

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Suinesiaputra A Cowan BR Al-Agamy AO Elattar MA Ayache N Fahmy AS. A collaborative resource to build consensus for automated left ventricular segmentation of cardiac MR images. Med Image Anal. (2014 ) 18:50–62.. Data source: http://www.cardiacatlas.org/challenges/lv-segmentation-challenge/

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2013.09.001

  13. 13.

    Karim R Housden RJ Balasubramaniam M Chen Z Perry D Uddin A. Evaluation of current algorithms for segmentation of scar tissue from late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the left atrium: an open-access grand challenge. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. (2013 ) 15:105.. Data source: https://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~rkarim/la_lv_framework/fibrosis

    Not in our library10.1186/1532-429x-15-105

  14. 14.

    Karim R Bhagirath P Claus P James Housden R Chen Z Karimaghaloo Z. Evaluation of state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms for left ventricle infarct from late gadolinium enhancement MR images. Med Image Anal. (2016 ) 30:95–107. Data source: https://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~rkarim/la_lv_framework/lv_infarct/

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2016.01.004

  15. 15.

    Tobon-Gomez C Geers AJ Peters J Weese J Pinto K Karim R. Benchmark for algorithms segmenting the left atrium from 3D CT and MRI datasets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2015 ) 34:1460–73.. Data source: www.cardiacatlas.org/challenges/left-atrium-segmentation-challenge/

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2015.2398818

  16. 16.

    Pace DF Dalca AV Geva T Powell AJ Moghari MH Golland P. Interactive whole-heart segmentation in congenital heart disease. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. (2015 ) 9351:80–8.. Data source: http://segchd.csail.mit.edu/

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_10

  17. 17.

    Bernard O Lalande A Zotti C Cervenansky F Yang X Heng PA. Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2018 ) 37:2514–25. Data source: https://acdc.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2018.2837502

  18. 18.

    Zhao J Xiong Z 2018 Left Atrial Segmentation Challenge Dataset (2018 ). available online at: http://atriaseg2018.cardiacatlas.org/. Data source: http://atriaseg2018.cardiacatlas.org/

    Not in our library

  19. 19.
  20. 20.

    Schaap M Metz CT van Walsum T van der Giessen AG Weustink AC Mollet NR. Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms. Med Image Anal. (2009 ) 13:701–14.. Data source: http://coronary.bigr.nl/centerlines/

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2009.06.003

  21. 21.

    Kirişli HA Schaap M Metz CT Dharampal AS Meijboom WB Papadopoulou SL. Standardized evaluation framework for evaluating coronary artery stenosis detection, stenosis quantification and lumen segmentation algorithms in computed tomography angiography. Med Image Anal. (2013 ) 17:859–76.. Data source: http://coronary.bigr.nl/stenoses

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2013.05.007

  22. 22.

    Bernard O Bosch JG Heyde B Alessandrini M Barbosa D Camarasu-Pop S. Standardized evaluation system for left ventricular segmentation algorithms in 3D echocardiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2016 ) 35:967–77. Data source: https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/Challenge/CETUS

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2015.2503890

  23. 23.

    Leclerc S Smistad E Pedrosa J Ostvik A Cervenansky F Espinosa F. Deep learning for segmentation using an open large-scale dataset in 2D echocardiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2019 ) 38:2198–210.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2019.2900516

  24. 24.

    Tran PV A fully convolutional neural network for cardiac segmentation in short-axis MRI. arxiv (2016 ) abs/1604.00494. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.00494 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Baumgartner CF Koch LM Pollefeys M Konukoglu E An exploration of 2D and 3D deep learning techniques for cardiac MR image segmentation. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. International Workshop on Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart, Vo. 10663. Cham: Springer (2017 ). p. 1–8.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Isensee F Jaeger PF Full PM Wolf I Engelhardt S Maier-Hein KH Automatic cardiac disease assessment on cine-MRI via time-series segmentation and domain specific features. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Quebec City, QC: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 120–9.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Zheng Q Delingette H Duchateau N Ayache N. 3-D consistent and robust segmentation of cardiac images by deep learning with spatial propagation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2018 ) 37:2137–48.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2018.2820742

  28. 28.

    Qin C Bai W Schlemper J Petersen SE Piechnik SK Neubauer S Joint learning of motion estimation and segmentation for cardiac MR image sequences. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. Proceedings, Part I of the 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2018. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 472–80.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Khened M Kollerathu VA Krishnamurthi G. Fully convolutional multi-scale residual DenseNets for cardiac segmentation and automated cardiac diagnosis using ensemble of classifiers. Med Image Anal. (2019 ) 51:21–45.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2018.10.004

  30. 30.

    Yu L Cheng JZ Dou Q Yang X Chen H Qin J Automatic 3D cardiovascular MR segmentation with densely-connected volumetric ConvNets. In: Descoteaux M Maier-Hein L Franz AM Jannin P Collins DL Duchesne S, editors. Proceedings, Part II of the 20th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2017. Quebec City, QC: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 287–95.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    Bai W Suzuki H Qin C Tarroni G Oktay O Matthews PM Recurrent neural networks for aortic image sequence segmentation with sparse annotations. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2018. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 586–94.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Duan J Bello G Schlemper J Bai W Dawes TJW Biffi C Automatic 3D bi-ventricular segmentation of cardiac images by a shape-constrained multi-task deep learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. (2019 ) PP:1

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2019.2894322

  34. 34.

    Chen C Bai W Rueckert D Multi-task learning for left atrial segmentation on GE-MRI. In: Pop M Sermesant M Zhao J Li S McLeod K Young AA Rhode KS Mansi T, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction With MICCAI 2018, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 292–301.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Yu L Wang S Li X Fu CW Heng PA Uncertainty-aware self-ensembling model for semi-supervised 3D left atrium segmentation. In: Shen D Liu T Peters TM Staib LH Essert C Zhou S Yap P-T Khan A, editors. Proceedings, Part II of the 22nd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2019. Shenzhen: Springer International Publishing (2019 ). p. 605–13.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Yang X Bian C Yu L Ni D Heng PA Hybrid loss guided convolutional networks for whole heart parsing. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Quebec City, QC: Springer (2017 ). p. 215–23.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Xu Z Wu Z Feng J CFUN: combining faster R-CNN and U-net network for efficient whole heart segmentation. arxiv (2018 ) abs/1812.04914. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04914 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Merkow J Marsden A Kriegman D Tu Z Dense volume-to-volume vascular boundary detection. In: urselin S Joskowicz L Sabuncu MR Ünal GB Wells W, editors. Proceedings, Part III of the 19th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2016. Athens: Springer (2016 ). p. 371–9.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Dou Q Ouyang C Chen C Chen H Heng PA Unsupervised cross-modality domain adaptation of ConvNets for biomedical image segmentations with adversarial loss. In: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (2018 ). p. 691–7.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Dou Q Ouyang C Chen C Chen H Glocker B Zhuang X PnP-AdaNet: plug-and-play adversarial domain adaptation network at unpaired cross-modality cardiac segmentation. IEEE Access. (2019 ) 7:99065–76.

    Not in our library10.1109/access.2019.2929258

  41. 41.

    Chen C Dou Q Zhou J Qin J Heng PA Synergistic image and feature adaptation: towards cross-modality domain adaptation for medical image segmentation. In: The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019, The Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019. Honolulu, HI: AAAI Press (2019 ). p. 865–72.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    Zhang J Gajjala S Agrawal P Tison GH Hallock LA Beussink-Nelson L Fully automated echocardiogram interpretation in clinical practice: feasibility and diagnostic accuracy. Circulation. (2018 ) 138:1623–35.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.118.034338

  43. 43.

    Goodfellow I Deep Learning. Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press (2016 ).

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    Szegedy C Liu W Jia Y Sermanet P Reed SE Anguelov D Going deeper with convolutions. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2015. Boston, MA (2015 ). p. 1–9.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    Simonyan K Zisserman A Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015. San Diego, CA (2015 ). p. 14 Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    Ciresan DC Giusti A Deep neural networks segment neuronal membranes in electron microscopy images. In: Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2012 ). p. 2852–60. Available online at: http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4741-deep-neural-networks-segment-neuronal-membranes-in-electron-microscopy-images

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    Avendi MR Kheradvar A Jafarkhani H. A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. Med Image Anal. (2016 ) 30:108–19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2016.01.005

  48. 48.

    Long J Shelhamer E Darrell T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2015 ). p. 3431–40.

    Not in our library10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965

  49. 49.

    Ronneberger FP Olaf Brox T U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N Hornegger J Wells WM III Frangi AF, editors. Proceedings, Part III of the 18th International Conference, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2015. Munich: Springer International Publishing (2015 ). p. 234–41.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    Shelhamer E Long J Darrell T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. (2017 ) 39:640–51.

    Not in our library10.1109/tpami.2016.2572683

  51. 51.

    Çiçek Ö Abdulkadir A Lienkamp SS Brox T Ronneberger O 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In: 19th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2016. Athens (2016 ). p. 424–32.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    Milletari F Navab N Ahmadi S V-Net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In: 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision, 3DV. Stanford, CA: IEEE Computer Society (2016 ). p. 565–71.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.

    Tao Q Yan W Wang Y Paiman EHM Shamonin DP Garg P. Deep learning–based method for fully automatic quantification of left ventricle function from cine MR images: a multivendor, multicenter study. Radiology. (2019 ) 290:180513.

    Not in our library10.1148/radiol.2018180513

  54. 54.

    Xia Q Yao Y Hu Z Hao A Automatic 3D atrial segmentation from GE-MRIs using volumetric fully convolutional networks. In: Pop M Sermesant M Zhao J Li S McLeod K Young AA Rhode KS Mansi T, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges–9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 211–20.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    Poudel RPK Lamata P Montana G Recurrent fully convolutional neural networks for multi-slice MRI cardiac segmentation. In: 1st International Workshops on Reconstruction and Analysis of Moving Body Organs, RAMBO 2016 and 1st International Workshops on Whole-Heart and Great Vessel Segmentation from 3D Cardiovascular MRI in Congenital Heart Disease, HVSMR 2016 (2016 ). p. 83–94. Available online at: http://segchd.csail.mit.edu/ (accessed September 1, 2019). Data source: http://segchd.csail.mit.edu/

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    Hochreiter S Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. (1997 ) 9:1735–80.

    Not in our library10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

  57. 57.

    Cho K van Merrienboer B Gulcehre C Bahdanau D Bougares F Schwenk H Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL (2014 ). p. 1724–34. Available online at: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1179/

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    Schlemper J Oktay O Bai W Castro DC Duan J Qin C Cardiac MR segmentation from undersampled k-space using deep latent representation learning. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, ediotrs. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2018. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 259–67.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    Oktay O Ferrante E Kamnitsas K Heinrich M Bai W Caballero J. Anatomically constrained neural networks (ACNNs): application to cardiac image enhancement and segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2018 ) 37:384–95.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2017.2743464

  60. 60.

    Biffi C Oktay O Tarroni G Bai W De Marvao A Doumou G Learning interpretable anatomical features through deep generative models: application to cardiac remodeling. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2018. Vol. 11071 LNCS. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 464–71.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.

    Painchaud N Skandarani Y Judge T Bernard O Lalande A Jodoin PM Cardiac MRI segmentation with strong anatomical guarantees. In: Shen D Liu T Peters TM Staib LH Essert C Zhou S Yap P-T Khan A, editors. Proceedings, Part II of the 22nd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2019. Shenzhen: Springer International Publishing (2019 ). p. 632–40.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    Oktay O Bai W Lee M Guerrero R Kamnitsas K Caballero J Multi-input cardiac image super-resolution using convolutional neural networks. In: urselin S Joskowicz L Sabuncu MR Ünal GB Wells W, editors. 19th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2016.. Vol. 9902 LNCS. Athens: Springer International Publishing (2016 ). p. 246–54.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    Yue Q Luo X Ye Q Xu L Zhuang X Cardiac segmentation from LGE MRI using deep neural network incorporating shape and spatial priors. In: Shen D Liu T Peters TM Staib LH Essert C Zhou S Yap P-T Khan A, editors. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI, 2019. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2019 ). p. 559–67.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    Goodfellow IJ Pouget-Abadie J Mirza M Xu B Warde-Farley D Ozair S Generative adversarial networks. In: Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc. (2014 ). p. 2672–80. Available online at: http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5423-generative-adversarial-nets.pdf

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    Luc P Couprie C Chintala S Verbeek J Semantic segmentation using adversarial networks. In: NIPS Workshop on Adversarial Training (2016 ). p. 1–12.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    Savioli N Vieira MS Lamata P Montana G A generative adversarial model for right ventricle segmentation. arxiv (2018 ) abs/1810.03969. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03969 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    Szegedy C Vanhoucke V Ioffe S Shlens J Wojna Z Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2016. Las Vegas, NV: IEEE Computer Society (2016 ). p. 2818–26.

    Not in our library

  68. 68.

    Szegedy C Ioffe S Vanhoucke V Alemi AA Inception-v4, inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA (2017 ). p. 4278–84. Available online at: http://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI17/paper/view/14806

    Not in our library

  69. 69.

    Vaswani A Shazeer N Parmar N Uszkoreit J Jones L Gomez AN Attention is all you need. In: Guyon I Luxburg UV Bengio S Wallach H Fergus R Vishwanathan S, editors. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc. (2017 ). p. 5998–6008.

    Not in our library

  70. 70.

    Oktay O Schlemper J Folgoc LL Lee M Heinrich M Misawa K Attention U-Net: learning where to look for the pancreas. In: Medical Imaging With Deep Learning (2018 ). p. 180403999.

    Not in our library

  71. 71.

    He K Zhang X Ren S Sun J Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR, 2016. IEEE Computer Society: Las Vegas, NV (2016 ). p. 770–8.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    Yu F Koltun V Multi-scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2016 ). p. 1–13.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.

    Lee CY Xie S Gallagher P Zhang Z Tu Z Deeply-supervised nets. In: Lebanon G Vishwanathan SVN, editors. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 38 San Diego, CA: PMLR (2015 ). p. 562–70. Available online at: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v38/lee15a.html

    Not in our library

  74. 74.

    Chen LC Papandreou G Schroff F Adam H Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arxiv (2017 ) abs/1706.05587. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05587 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    He K Zhang X Ren S Sun J. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. (2015 ) 37:1904–16.

    Not in our library10.1109/tpami.2015.2389824

  76. 76.

    Jetley S Lord NA Lee N Torr PHS Learn to pay attention. In: 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018, Conference Track Proceedings. Vancouver, BC (2018 ).

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    Hu J Shen L Sun G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR, 2018, Salt Lake City, UT: IEEE Computer Society (2018 ). p. 7132–41.

    Not in our library

  78. 78.

    Huang G Liu Z van der Maaten L Weinberger KQ. Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2017 ). p. 2261–9. 29997087

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Rumelhart DE Hinton GE Williams RJ Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature. (1986 ) 323:533–6.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    Jang Y Hong Y Ha S Kim S Chang HJ Automatic segmentation of LV and RV in cardiac MRI. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. International Workshop on Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Springer (2017 ). p. 161–9.

    Not in our library

  81. 81.

    Yang X Bian C Yu L Ni D Heng PA Class-balanced deep neural network for automatic ventricular structure segmentation. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Quebec City, QC: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 152–60.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    Srivastava N Hinton G Krizhevsky A Sutskever I Salakhutdinov R Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res. (2014 ) 15:1929–58.

    Not in our library10.5555/2627435.2670313

  83. 83.

    Kamnitsas K Bai W Ferrante E Mcdonagh S Sinclair M Ensembles of multiple models and architectures for robust brain tumour segmentation. In: Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries–Third International Workshop, BrainLes 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017. Quebec City, QC (2017 ). p. 450–62.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    Zheng H Zhang Y Yang L Liang P Zhao Z Wang C A new ensemble learning framework for 3D biomedical image segmentation. In: The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019, The Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019, Honolulu, HI:AAAI Press (2019 ). p. 5909–16.

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    Chen S Ma K Zheng Y Med3D: transfer learning for 3D medical image analysis. arxiv (2019 ) abs/1904.00625. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.00625 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    Xue W Brahm G Pandey S Leung S Li S. Full left ventricle quantification via deep multitask relationships learning. Med Image Anal. (2018 ) 43:54–65.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2017.09.005

  87. 87.

    Zheng Q Delingette H Ayache N. Explainable cardiac pathology classification on cine MRI with motion characterization by semi-supervised learning of apparent flow. Med Image Anal. (2019 ) 56:80–95.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2019.06.001

  88. 88.

    Bello GA Dawes TJW Duan J Biffi C de Marvao A Howard LSGE. Deep learning cardiac motion analysis for human survival prediction. Nat Mach Intell. (2019 ) 1:95–104.

    Not in our library10.1038/s42256-019-0019-2

  89. 89.

    Van Der Geest RJ Reiber JH. Quantification in cardiac MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. (1999 ) 10:602–8.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199911)10:5<602::aid-jmri3>3.0.co;2-c

  90. 90.

    Lieman-Sifry J Le M Lau F Sall S Golden D FastVentricle: cardiac segmentation with ENet. In: Pop M Wright GA, editors. Functional Imaging and Modelling of the Heart. Vol. 10263 LNCS of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 127–38.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    Fahmy AS El-Rewaidy H Nezafat M Nakamori S Nezafat R. Automated analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial native T1 mapping images using fully convolutional neural networks. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. (2019 ) 21:1–12.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12968-018-0516-1

  92. 92.

    Patravali J Jain S Chilamkurthy S 2D–3D fully convolutional neural networks for cardiac MR segmentation. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Quebec City, QC: Springer (2017 ). p. 130–9.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.

    Wolterink JM Leiner T Viergever MA Išgum I Automatic segmentation and disease classification using cardiac cine MR images. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges—8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017. Vol. 10663 LNCS of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Quebec City, QC: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 101–10.

    Not in our library

  94. 94.

    Tan LK Liew YM Lim E McLaughlin RA. Convolutional neural network regression for short-axis left ventricle segmentation in cardiac cine MR sequences. Med Image Anal. (2017 ) 39:78–86.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2017.04.002

  95. 95.

    Vigneault DM Xie W Ho CY Bluemke DA Noble JA. Ω-Net (Omega-Net): fully automatic, multi-view cardiac MR detection, orientation, and segmentation with deep neural networks. Med Image Anal. (2018 ) 48:95–106.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2018.05.008

  96. 96.

    Avendi MR Kheradvar A Jafarkhani H. Automatic segmentation of the right ventricle from cardiac MRI using a learning-based approach. Magn Reson Med. (2017 ) 78:2439–48.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.26631

  97. 97.

    Yang H Sun J Li H Wang L Xu Z Deep fusion net for multi-atlas segmentation: application to cardiac MR images. In: urselin S Joskowicz L Sabuncu MR Ünal GB Wells W, editors. 19th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention— MICCAI, 2016. Athens: Springer International Publishing (2016 ). p. 521–8.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_60

  98. 98.

    Ngo TA Lu Z Carneiro G. Combining deep learning and level set for the automated segmentation of the left ventricle of the heart from cardiac cine magnetic resonance. Med Image Anal. (2017 ) 35:159–71.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2016.05.009

  99. 99.

    Mortazi A Karim R Rhode K Burt J Bagci U CardiacNET: segmentation of left atrium and proximal pulmonary veins from MRI using multi-view CNN. In: Descoteaux M Maier-Hein L Franz AM Jannin P Collins DL Duchesne S, editors. 20th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2017. Quebec City, QC: Springer (2017 ). p. 377–85.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    Xiong Z Fedorov VV Fu X Cheng E Macleod R Zhao J. Fully automatic left atrium segmentation from late gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a dual fully convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2019 ) 38:515–24.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2018.2866845

  101. 101.

    Yang G Zhuang X Khan H Haldar S Nyktari E Li L. Fully automatic segmentation and objective assessment of atrial scars for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation patients using late gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Med Phys. (2018 ) 45:1562–76.

    Not in our library10.1002/mp.12832

  102. 102.

    Chen J Yang G Gao Z Ni H Firmin D others Multiview two-task recursive attention model for left atrium and atrial scars segmentation. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2018, Vol. 11071. Granada: Springer (2018 ). p. 455–63.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    Zabihollahy F White JA Ukwatta E Myocardial scar segmentation from magnetic resonance images using convolutional neural network. In: Medical Imaging 2018: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. Vol. 10575 International Society for Optics and Photonics (2018 ). p. 105752Z.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    Moccia S Banali R Martini C Muscogiuri G Pontone G Pepi M. Development and testing of a deep learning-based strategy for scar segmentation on CMR-LGE images. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. (2019 ) 32:187–95.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10334-018-0718-4

  105. 105.

    Xu C Xu L Gao Z Zhao S Zhang H Zhang Y. Direct delineation of myocardial infarction without contrast agents using a joint motion feature learning architecture. Med Image Anal. (2018 ) 50:82–94.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2018.09.001

  106. 106.

    Li J Zhang R Shi L Wang D Automatic whole-heart segmentation in congenital heart disease using deeply-supervised 3D FCN. In: Zuluaga MA Bhatia KK Kainz B Moghari MH Pace DF, editors. Proceedings of the First International Workshops, RAMBO 2016 and HVSMR 2016, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2016, Reconstruction, Segmentation, and Analysis of Medical Images. Athens: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 111–8.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    Wolterink JM Leiner T Viergever MA Išgum I Dilated convolutional neural networks for cardiovascular MR segmentation in congenital heart disease. In: Zuluaga MA Bhatia KK Kainz B Moghari MH Pace DF, editors. Proceedings of the First International Workshops, RAMBO 2016 and HVSMR 2016, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2016, Reconstruction, Segmentation, and Analysis of Medical Images. Athens: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 95–102.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-319-52280-7

  108. 108.

    Li C Tong Q Liao X Si W Chen S Wang Q APCP-NET: aggregated parallel cross-scale pyramid network for CMR segmentation. In: 16th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI, Venice (2019 ). p. 784–8.

    Not in our library

  109. 109.

    Zotti C Luo Z Lalande A Jodoin PM. Convolutional neural Network with shape prior applied to cardiac MRI segmentation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. (2019 ) 23:1119–28.

    Not in our library10.1109/jbhi.2018.2865450

  110. 110.

    Zotti C Luo Z Lalande A Humbert O Jodoin PM GridNet with automatic shape prior registration for automatic MRI cardiac segmentation. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Vol. 10663 Quebec City, QC: Springer (2017 ). p. 73–81.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    Rohé MM Sermesant M Pennec X Automatic multi-atlas segmentation of myocardium with SVF-Net. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017 Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges, Vol. 10663 Quebec City, QC: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 170–7.

    Not in our library

  112. 112.

    Tziritas G Grinias E Fast fully-automatic localization of left ventricle and myocardium in MRI using MRF model optimization, substructures tracking and B-spline smoothing. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Quebec City, QC: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 91–100.

    Not in our library

  113. 113.

    Zreik M Leiner T De Vos BD Van Hamersvelt RW Viergever MA Isgum I Automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac CT angiography using convolutional neural networks. In: International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (2016 ). p. 40–3.

    Not in our library

  114. 114.

    Payer C Štern D Bischof H Urschler M Multi-label whole heart segmentation using CNNs and anatomical label configurations. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Quebec City, QC: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 190–8.

    Not in our library

  115. 115.

    Tong Q Ning M Si W Liao X Qin J 3D deeply-supervised U-net based whole heart segmentation. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Quebec City, QC: Springer (2017 ). p. 224–32.

    Not in our library

  116. 116.

    Wang C MacGillivray T Macnaught G Yang G Newby D A two-stage 3D Unet framework for multi-class segmentation on full resolution image. arxiv (2018 ) 1–10. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.04341 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  117. 117.

    Wang C Smedby Ö Automatic whole heart segmentation using deep learning and shape context. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges—8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction With MICCAI 2017. Quebec City, QC: Springer (2017 ). p. 242–9.

    Not in our library

  118. 118.

    Mortazi A Burt J Bagci U Multi-planar deep segmentation networks for cardiac substructures from MRI and CT. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Quebec City, QC: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 199–206.

    Not in our library

  119. 119.
  120. 120.

    Zreik M Lessmann N van Hamersvelt RW Wolterink JM Voskuil M Viergever MA. Deep learning analysis of the myocardium in coronary CT angiography for identification of patients with functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Med Image Anal. (2018 ) 44:72–85.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2017.11.008

  121. 121.

    Joyce T Chartsias A Tsaftaris SA Deep multi-class segmentation without ground-truth labels. In: Medical Imaging With Deep Learning (2018 ). p. 1–9.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    Moeskops P Wolterink JM van der Velden BH Gilhuijs KG Leiner T Viergever MA Deep learning for multi-task medical image segmentation in multiple modalities. In: urselin S Joskowicz L Sabuncu MR Ünal GB Wells W, editors. 19th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2016. Athens: Springer (2016 ). p. 478–86.

    Not in our library

  123. 123.

    Lee MCH Petersen K Pawlowski N Glocker B Schaap M. TETRIS: template transformer networks for image segmentation with shape priors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2019 ) 38:2596–606.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2019.2905990

  124. 124.

    Gülsün MA Funka-Lea G Sharma P Rapaka S Zheng Y Coronary centerline extraction via optimal flow paths and CNN path pruning. In: urselin S Joskowicz L Sabuncu MR Ünal GB Wells W, editors. 19th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2016. Athens: Springer (2016 ). p. 317–25.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    Guo Z Bai J Lu Y Wang X Cao K Song Q DeepCenterline: a multi-task fully convolutional network for centerline extraction. In: Chung ACS Gee JC Yushkevich PA Bao S, editors. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference, Information Processing in Medical Imaging—IPMI, 2019. Hong Kong: Springer (2019 ). p. 441–53.

    Not in our library

  126. 126.
  127. 127.

    Wolterink JM van Hamersvelt RW Viergever MA Leiner T Išgum I. Coronary artery centerline extraction in cardiac CT angiography using a CNN-based orientation classifier. Med Image Anal. (2019 ) 51:46–60.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2018.10.005

  128. 128.

    Wolterink JM Leiner T Išgum I Graph convolutional networks for coronary artery segmentation in cardiac CT angiography. arxiv (2019 ) abs/1908.05343. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.05343 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  129. 129.

    Wolterink JM Leiner T de Vos BD van Hamersvelt RW Viergever MA Išgum I. Automatic coronary artery calcium scoring in cardiac CT angiography using paired convolutional neural networks. Med Image Anal. (2016 ) 34:123–36.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2016.04.004

  130. 130.

    Lessmann N Išgum I Setio AA de Vos BD Ciompi F de Jong PA Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic coronary calcium scoring in a screening study with low-dose chest CT. In: Tourassi GD Armato SG III editors. Medical Imaging 2016: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. Vol. 9785. San Diego, CA: International Society for Optics and Photonics; SPIE (2016 ). p. 978511.

    Not in our library

  131. 131.

    Lessmann N van Ginneken B Zreik M de Jong PA de Vos BD Viergever MA. Automatic calcium scoring in low-dose chest CT using deep neural networks with dilated convolutions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2017 ) 37:615–25.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2017.2769839

  132. 132.

    Liu J Jin C Feng J Du Y Lu J Zhou J A vessel-focused 3D convolutional network for automatic segmentation and classification of coronary artery plaques in cardiac CTA. In: Pop M Sermesant M Zhao J Li S McLeod K Young AA Rhode KS Mansi T, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges. Granada: Springer (2018 ). p. 131–41.

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    Santini G Della Latta D Martini N Valvano G Gori A Ripoli A An automatic deep learning approach for coronary artery calcium segmentation. In: International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. Vol. 65 (2017 ). p. 374–7.

    Not in our library

  134. 134.

    Shadmi R Mazo V Bregman-Amitai O Elnekave E Fully-convolutional deep-learning based system for coronary calcium score prediction from non-contrast chest CT. In: 15th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI, 2018. Washington, DC: IEEE (2018 ). p. 24–8.

    Not in our library

  135. 135.

    Zhang W Zhang J Du X Zhang Y Li S An end-to-end joint learning framework of artery-specific coronary calcium scoring in non-contrast cardiac CT. Computing. (2019 ) 101:667–78.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00607-018-0678-6

  136. 136.

    Ma J Zhang R Automatic calcium scoring in cardiac and chest CT using DenseRAUnet. arxiv (2019 ) abs/1907.11392. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11392 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  137. 137.

    Yang X Bian C Yu L Ni D Heng PA 3D convolutional networks for fully automatic fine-grained whole heart partition. In: Pop M Sermesant M Jodoin P-M Lalande A Zhuang X Yang G Young AA Bernard O, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop, STACOM 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. ACDC and MMWHS Challenges. Quebec City, QC: Springer (2017 ). p. 181–9.

    Not in our library

  138. 138.

    Carneiro G Nascimento J Freitas A Robust left ventricle segmentation from ultrasound data using deep neural networks and efficient search methods. In: 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro (2010 ). p. 1085–8.

    Not in our library

  139. 139.

    Carneiro G Nascimento JC Freitas A. The segmentation of the left ventricle of the heart from ultrasound data using deep learning architectures and derivative-based search methods. IEEE Trans Image Process. (2012 ) 21:968–82.

    Not in our library10.1109/tip.2011.2169273

  140. 140.

    Nascimento JC Carneiro G. Deep learning on sparse manifolds for faster object segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process. (2017 ) 26:4978–90.

    Not in our library10.1109/tip.2017.2725582

  141. 141.

    Nascimento JC Carneiro G Non-rigid segmentation using sparse low dimensional manifolds and deep belief networks. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition—CVPR, 2014. Columbus, OH: IEEE Computer Society (2014 ). p. 288–95.

    Not in our library10.1109/cvpr.2014.44

  142. 142.

    Nascimento JC Carneiro G. One shot segmentation: unifying rigid detection and non-rigid segmentation using elastic regularization. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1109/tpami.2019.2922959

  143. 143.

    Veni G Moradi M Bulu H Narayan G Syeda-Mahmood T Echocardiography segmentation based on a shape-guided deformable model driven by a fully convolutional network prior. In: 15th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging—ISBI, 2018. Washington, DC: IEEE (2018 ). p. 898–902.

    Not in our library10.1109/isbi.2018.8363716

  144. 144.

    Carneiro G Nascimento JC Multiple dynamic models for tracking the left ventricle of the heart from ultrasound data using particle filters and deep learning architectures. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE (2010 ). p. 2815–22.

    Not in our library10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540013

  145. 145.

    Carneiro G Nascimento JC. Combining multiple dynamic models and deep learning architectures for tracking the left ventricle endocardium in ultrasound data. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. (2013 ) 35:2592–607.

    Not in our library10.1109/tpami.2013.96

  146. 146.

    Jafari MH Girgis H Liao Z Behnami D Abdi A Vaseli H A unified framework integrating recurrent fully-convolutional networks and optical flow for segmentation of the left ventricle in echocardiography data. In: Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 29–37.

    Not in our library

  147. 147.

    Carneiro G Nascimento JC Incremental on-line semi-supervised learning for segmenting the left ventricle of the heart from ultrasound data. In: 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. Barcelona: IEEE (2011 ). p. 1700–7.

    Not in our library10.1109/iccv.2011.6126433

  148. 148.

    Carneiro G Nascimento JC The use of on-line co-training to reduce the training set size in pattern recognition methods: application to left ventricle segmentation in ultrasound. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Providence, RI: IEEE (2012 ). p. 948–55.

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    Smistad E Ostvik A Haugen BO Lovstakken L 2D left ventricle segmentation using deep learning. In: 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). IEEE (2017 ). p. 1–4.

    Not in our library

  150. 150.

    Yu L Guo Y Wang Y Yu J Chen P. Segmentation of fetal left ventricle in echocardiographic sequences based on dynamic convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. (2017 ) 64:1886–95.

    Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2016.2628401

  151. 151.

    Jafari MH Girgis H Abdi AH Liao Z Pesteie M Rohling R Semi-supervised learning for cardiac left ventricle segmentation using conditional deep generative models as prior. In: 16th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging ISBI 2019. Venice: IEEE (2019 ). p. 649–52.

    Not in our library

  152. 152.

    Girdhar R Fouhey DF Rodriguez M Gupta A Learning a predictable and generative vector representation for objects. In: Leibe B Matas J Sebe N Welling M, editors. Proceedings, Part VI of the 14th European Conference, Computer Vision—ECCV 2016. Amsterdam: Springer International Publishing (2016 ). p. 484–99.

    Not in our library

  153. 153.

    Chen H Zheng Y Park JH Heng PA Zhou SK Iterative multi-domain regularized deep learning for anatomical structure detection and segmentation from ultrasound images. In: Ourselin S Leo Joskowicz Mert R. Sabuncu Ünal GB William Wells editors. Proceedings, Part II of the 19th International Conference, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2016. Athens: Springer International Publishing (2016 ). p. 487–95.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    Smistad E Østvik A Mjal Salte I Leclerc S Bernard O Lovstakken L Fully automatic real-time ejection fraction and MAPSE measurements in 2D echocardiography using deep neural networks. In: 2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). IEEE (2018 ). p. 1–4.

    Not in our library

  155. 155.

    Leclerc S Smistad E Grenier T Lartizien C Ostvik A Espinosa F Deep learning applied to multi-structure segmentation in 2D echocardiography: a preliminary investigation of the required database size. In: 2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). IEEE (2018 ). p. 1–4.

    Not in our library

  156. 156.

    Jafari MH Girgis H Van Woudenberg N Liao Z Rohling R Gin K. Automatic biplane left ventricular ejection fraction estimation with mobile point-of-care ultrasound using multi-task learning and adversarial training. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. (2019 ) 14:1027–37.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11548-019-01954-w

  157. 157.

    Dong S Luo G Wang K Cao S Li Q Zhang H. A combined fully convolutional networks and deformable model for automatic left ventricle segmentation based on 3D echocardiography. Biomed Res Int. (2018 ) 2018:5682365.

    Not in our library10.1155/2018/5682365

  158. 158.

    Dong S Luo G Wang K Cao S Mercado A Shmuilovich O VoxelAtlasGAN: 3D left ventricle segmentation on echocardiography with atlas guided generation and voxel-to-voxel discrimination. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2018. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 622–9.

    Not in our library

  159. 159.

    Ghesu FC Krubasik E Georgescu B Singh V Yefeng Zheng Hornegger J. Marginal space deep learning: efficient architecture for volumetric image parsing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2016 ) 35:1217–28.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2016.2538802

  160. 160.

    Degel MA Navab N Albarqouni S Domain and geometry agnostic CNNs for left atrium segmentation in 3D ultrasound. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2018. Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 630–7.

    Not in our library

  161. 161.

    Karim R Blake LE Inoue J Tao Q Jia S James Housden R. Algorithms for left atrial wall segmentation and thickness–evaluation on an open-source CT and MRI image database. Med Image Anal. (2018 ) 50:36–53.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2018.08.004

  162. 162.

    Li J Yu Z Gu Z Liu H Li Y. Dilated-inception net: multi-scale feature aggregation for cardiac right ventricle segmentation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. (2019 ) 66:3499–508.

    Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2019.2906667

  163. 163.

    Zhou XY Yang GZ Normalization in training U-Net for 2D biomedical semantic segmentation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. (2019 ) 4:1792–9.

    Not in our library10.1109/lra.2019.2896518

  164. 164.

    Zhang J Du J Liu H Hou X Zhao Y Ding M LU-NET: an Improved U-Net for ventricular segmentation. IEEE Access. (2019 ) 7:92539–46.

    Not in our library10.1109/access.2019.2925060

  165. 165.

    Cong C Zhang H Invert-U-Net DNN segmentation model for MRI cardiac left ventricle segmentation. J Eng. (2018 ) 2018:1463–7.

    Not in our library10.1049/joe.2018.8302

  166. 166.

    Sander J de Vos BD Wolterink JM Išgum I Towards increased trustworthiness of deep learning segmentation methods on cardiac MRI. In: Medical Imaging 2019: Image Processing. Vol. 10949. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2019 ). p. 1094919.

    Not in our library

  167. 167.

    Chen M Fang L Liu H FR-NET: focal Loss constrained deep residual networks for segmentation of cardiac MRI. In: 16th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI, 2019. Venice: IEEE (2019 ). p. 764–7.

    Not in our library

  168. 168.

    Chen C Biffi C Tarroni G Petersen S Bai W Rueckert D Learning shape priors for robust cardiac MR segmentation from multi-view images. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (2019 ). p. 523–31.

    Not in our library

  169. 169.

    Du X Yin S Tang R Zhang Y Li S. Cardiac-DeepIED: automatic pixel-level deep segmentation for cardiac bi-ventricle using improved end-to-end encoder-decoder network. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. (2019 ) 7:1–10.

    Not in our library10.1109/jtehm.2019.2900628

  170. 170.

    Yan W Wang Y Li Z van der Geest RJ Tao Q Left ventricle segmentation via optical-flow-net from short-axis cine MRI: preserving the temporal coherence of cardiac motion. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2018. Vol. 11073 LNCS. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 613–21.

    Not in our library

  171. 171.

    Savioli N Vieira MS Lamata P Montana G Automated segmentation on the entire cardiac cycle using a deep learning work—flow. In: 2018 Fifth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) (2018 ). p. 153–8.

    Not in our library

  172. 172.

    Clough JR Oksuz I Byrne N Schnabel JA King AP Explicit topological priors for deep-learning based image segmentation using persistent homology. In: Chung ACS Gee JC Yushkevich PA Bao S, editors. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference,IPMI 2019, Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Vol. 11492 LNCS Hong Kong (2019 ). p. 16–28.

    Not in our library

  173. 173.

    Chen X Williams BM Vallabhaneni SR Czanner G Williams R Zheng Y Learning active contour models for medical image segmentation. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2019 ). p. 11632–40.

    Not in our library

  174. 174.

    Qin C Bai W Schlemper J Petersen SE Piechnik SK Neubauer S Joint motion estimation and segmentation from undersampled cardiac MR image. In: Knoll F Maier AK Rueckert D, editors. Machine Learning for Medical Image Reconstruction - First International Workshop, MLMIR 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 55–63.

    Not in our library

  175. 175.

    Dangi S Yaniv Z Linte CA. Left ventricle segmentation and quantification from cardiac cine MR images via multi-task learning. In: Pop M Sermesant M Zhao J Li S McLeod K Young AA Rhode KS Mansi T, editors. Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges—9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction With MICCAI 2018. Granada: Springer (2018 ). p. 21–31.

    Not in our library

  176. 176.

    Zhang L Karanikolas GV Akçakaya M Giannakis GB. Fully automatic segmentation of the right ventricle via multi-task deep neural networks. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP, 2018. Calgary, AB: IEEE (2018 ). p. 6677–81.

    Not in our library10.1109/icassp.2018.8461556

  177. 177.

    Chartsias A Joyce T Papanastasiou G Semple S Williams M Newby D Factorised spatial representation learning: application in semi-supervised myocardial segmentation. In: Proceedings, Part II of the 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2018. Vol. 11071 LNCS. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 490–8.

    Not in our library

  178. 178.

    Chartsias A Joyce T Papanastasiou G Semple S Williams M Newby DE. Disentangled representation learning in cardiac image analysis. Med Image Anal. (2019 ) 58:101535.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2019.101535

  179. 179.

    Huang Q Yang D Yi J Axel L Metaxas D FR-Net: joint reconstruction and segmentation in compressed sensing cardiac MRI. In: Coudière Y Ozenne V Vigmond EJ Zemzemi N, editors. 10th International Conference on Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart—FIMH 2019. Bordeaux: Springer International Publishing (2019 ). p. 352–60.

    Not in our library

  180. 180.

    Liao F Chen X Hu X Song S. Estimation of the volume of the left ventricle from MRI images using deep neural networks. IEEE Trans Cybernet. (2019 ) 49:495–504.

    Not in our library10.1109/tcyb.2017.2778799

  181. 181.

    Duan J Schlemper J Bai W Dawes TJW Bello G Doumou G Deep nested level sets: fully automated segmentation of cardiac MR images in patients with pulmonary hypertension. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2018. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 595–603.

    Not in our library

  182. 182.

    Medley DO Santiago C Nascimento JC Segmenting the left ventricle in cardiac in cardiac MRI: from handcrafted to deep region based descriptors. In: 16th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging ISBI, 2019. Venice: IEEE (2019 ). p. 644–8.

    Not in our library

  183. 183.

    Lu X Chen X Li W Qiao Y Graph cut segmentation of the right ventricle in cardiac MRI using multi-scale feature learning. In: Wang Y Chang C-C, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy—ICCSP 2019. Kuala Lumpur: ACM (2019 ). p. 231–5.

    Not in our library

  184. 184.

    Karim R Mohiaddin R Rueckert D Left atrium segmentation for atrial fibrillation ablation. In: Medical Imaging 2008: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling. San Diego, CA: SPIE (2008 ). p. 69182U.

    Not in our library

  185. 185.

    Tao Q Shahzad R Ipek EG Berendsen FF Nazarian S van der Geest RJ. Fully automatic segmentation of left atrium and pulmonary veins in late gadolinium-enhanced MRI: towards objective atrial scar assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging. (2016 ) 44:346–54.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmri.25148

  186. 186.

    Zhuang X Rhode KS Razavi RS Hawkes DJ Ourselin S. A registration-based propagation framework for automatic whole heart segmentation of cardiac MRI. IEEE Trans Medical Imaging. (2010 ) 29:1612–25.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2010.2047112

  187. 187.

    Preetha CJ Haridasan S Abdi V Engelhardt S Segmentation of the left atrium from 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR images with convolutional neural networks. In: Pop M Sermesant M Zhao J Li S McLeod K Young AA Rhode KS Mansi T, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 265–72.

    Not in our library

  188. 188.

    Bian C Yang X Ma J Zheng S Liu YA Nezafat R Pyramid network with online hard example mining for accurate left atrium segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges 2018. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 237–45.

    Not in our library

  189. 189.

    Savioli N Montana G Lamata P V-FCNN: volumetric fully convolution neural network for automatic atrial segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 273–81.

    Not in our library

  190. 190.

    Jia S Despinasse A Wang Z Delingette H Pennec X Jaïs P Automatically segmenting the left atrium from cardiac images using successive 3D U-Nets and a contour loss. In: Pop M Sermesant M Zhao J Li S McLeod K Young AA Rhode KS Mansi T, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges. Granada: Springer (2018 ). p. 221–9.

    Not in our library

  191. 191.

    Vesal S Ravikumar N Maier A Dilated convolutions in neural networks for left atrial segmentation in 3D gadolinium enhanced-MRI. In: Pop M Sermesant M Zhao J Li S McLeod K Young AA Rhode KS Mansi T, ediotrs. Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges—9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction With MICCAI 2018. Granada: Springer (2018 ). p. 319–28.

    Not in our library

  192. 192.

    Li C Tong Q Liao X Si W Sun Y Wang Q Attention based hierarchical aggregation network for 3D left atrial segmentation: 9th international workshop, STACOM 2018, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 16, 2018, Revised Selected Papers. In: Pop M Sermesant M Zhao J Li S McLeod K Young A, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges. Vol. 11395 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham; Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 255–64.

    Not in our library

  193. 193.

    Yang G Chen J Gao Z Zhang H Ni H Angelini E. Multiview sequential learning and dilated residual learning for a fully automatic delineation of the left atrium and pulmonary veins from late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MRI images. In: 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2018. Honolulu, HI: IEEE (2018 ) 2018:1123–7.

    Not in our library10.1109/embc.2018.8512550

  194. 194.

    Kim RJ Fieno DS Parrish TB Harris K Chen EL Simonetti O. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation. (1999 ) 100:1992–2002.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.cir.100.19.1992

  195. 195.

    Carminati MC Boniotti C Fusini L Andreini D Pontone G Pepi M. Comparison of image processing techniques for nonviable tissue quantification in late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance images. J Thorac Imaging. (2016 ) 31:168–76.

    Not in our library10.1097/rti.0000000000000206

  196. 196.

    Yang G Zhuang X Khan H Haldar S Nyktari E Ye X Segmenting atrial fibrosis from late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MRI by deep-learned features with stacked sparse auto-encoders. In: Hernández MCV González-Castro V, editors. Proceedingsof the 21st Annual Conference on Medical Image Understanding and Analysis—MIUA. Edinburgh: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 195–206.

    Not in our library

  197. 197.

    Fahmy AS Rausch J Neisius U Chan RH Maron MS Appelbaum E. Automated cardiac MR scar quantification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using deep convolutional neural networks. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2018 ) 11:1917–8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.030

  198. 198.

    Rueckert D Sonoda LI Hayes C Hill DL Leach MO Hawkes DJ. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (1999 ) 18:712–21.

    Not in our library10.1109/42.796284

  199. 199.

    Herment A Kachenoura N Lefort M Bensalah M Dogui A Frouin F. Automated segmentation of the aorta from phase contrast MR images: validation against expert tracing in healthy volunteers and in patients with a dilated aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging. (2010 ) 31:881–8.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmri.22124

  200. 200.

    Shi Z Zeng G Zhang L Zhuang X Li L Yang G Bayesian VoxDRN: a probabilistic deep voxelwise dilated residual network for whole heart segmentation from 3D MR images. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2018. Vol. 49. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 569–77. Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/10380/3070 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  201. 201.

    Kang DW Woo J Slomka PJ Dey D Germano G Kuo J Heart chambers and whole heart segmentation techniques: review. J Electron Imaging. (2012 ) 21:010901

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jei.21.1.010901

  202. 202.

    Dormer JD Ma L Halicek M Reilly CM Schreibmann E Fei B. Heart chamber segmentation from CT using convolutional neural networks. In: Fei B Webster RJ, editors. Medical Imaging 2018: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging. Houston, TX: SPIE (2018 ). p. 105782S.

    Not in our library10.1117/12.2293554

  203. 203.

    de Vos BD Wolterink JM De Jong PA Leiner T Viergever MA Isgum I. ConvNet-based localization of anatomical structures in 3-D medical images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2017 ) 36:1470–81.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2017.2673121

  204. 204.

    Zhang DP Coronary Artery Segmentation and Motion Modelling. London: Imperial College (2010 ).

    Not in our library

  205. 205.

    Huang W Huang L Lin Z Huang S Chi Y Zhou J. Coronary artery segmentation by deep learning neural networks on computed tomographic coronary angiographic images. In: 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society EMBC, 2018. Honolulu, HI: IEEE (2018 ). p. 608–11.

    Not in our library10.1109/embc.2018.8512328

  206. 206.

    Chen YC Lin YC Wang CP Lee CY Lee WJ Wang TD Coronary artery segmentation in cardiac CT angiography using 3D multi-channel U-net. In: Jorge Cardoso M Feragen A Glocker B Konukoglu E Oguz I Unal GB Vercauteren T, editors. International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, MIDL, 2019. London (2019 ). p. 190712246.

    Not in our library

  207. 207.

    Duan Y Feng J Lu J Zhou J Context aware 3D fully convolutional networks for coronary artery segmentation. In: Pop M Sermesant M Zhao J Li S McLeod K Young AA Rhode KS Mansi T, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, STACOM 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Atrial Segmentation and LV Quantification Challenges. Granada: Springer (2018 ). p. 85–93.

    Not in our library

  208. 208.

    Agatston AS Janowitz WR Hildner FJ Zusmer NR Viamonte M Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1990 ) 15:827–32.

    Not in our library10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t

  209. 209.

    de Vos BD Wolterink JM Leiner T de Jong PA Lessmann N Isgum I. Direct automatic coronary calcium scoring in cardiac and chest CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2019 ) 38:2127–38.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2019.2899534

  210. 210.

    Cano-Espinosa C González G Washko GR Cazorla M Estépar RSJ. Automated Agatston score computation in non-ECG gated CT scans using deep learning. In: Angelini ED Landman BA, editors. Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing. Vol. 10574. Houston, TX: International Society for Optics and Photonics; SPIE (2018 ). p. 105742K.

    Not in our library10.1117/12.2293681

  211. 211.

    Zreik M van Hamersvelt RW Wolterink JM Leiner T Viergever MA Išgum I. A recurrent CNN for automatic detection and classification of coronary artery plaque and stenosis in coronary CT angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2018 ) 38:1588–98.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2018.2883807

  212. 212.

    Noble JA Boukerroui D. Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2006 ) 25:987–1010.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2006.877092

  213. 213.

    Hinton GE Salakhutdinov RR. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science. (2006 ) 313:504–7.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1127647

  214. 214.

    Smistad E Lindseth F Real-time tracking of the left ventricle in 3D ultrasound using Kalman filter and mean value coordinates. In: Medical Image Segmentation for Improved Surgical Navigation (2014 ). p. 189.

    Not in our library

  215. 215.

    Georgescu B Zhou XS Comaniciu D Gupta A Database-guided segmentation of anatomical structures with complex appearance. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05). Vol. 2. San Diego, CA: IEEE (2005 ). p. 429–36.

    Not in our library

  216. 216.

    Kass M Witkin A Terzopoulos D Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis. (1988 ) 1:321–31.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00133570

  217. 217.

    Kamnitsas K Baumgartner C Ledig C Newcombe V Simpson J Kane A Unsupervised domain adaptation in brain lesion segmentation with adversarial networks. In: Niethammer M Styner M Aylward SR Zhu H Oguz I Yap P-T Shen D, editors. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging—IPMI, 2017. Boone, NC: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 597–609.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_47

  218. 218.

    Zheng Y Barbu A Georgescu B Scheuering M Comaniciu D. Four-chamber heart modeling and automatic segmentation for 3-D cardiac CT volumes using marginal space learning and steerable features. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2008 ) 27:1668–81.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2008.2004421

  219. 219.

    Kingma DP Welling M Auto-encoding variational bayes. In: Bengio Y LeCun Y, editors. 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014. Banff, AB (2013 ). p. 1–14.

    Not in our library

  220. 220.

    Cubuk ED Zoph B Mane D Vasudevan V Le QV AutoAugment: learning augmentation policies from data. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2019 ). p. 113–23.

    Not in our library

  221. 221.

    Volpi R Namkoong H Sener O Duchi JC Murino V Savarese S Generalizing to unseen domains via adversarial data augmentation. In: Bengio S Wallach HM Larochelle H Grauman K Cesa-Bianchi N Garnett R, editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018, NeurIPS 2018. Montréal, QC (2018 ). p. 5339–49.

    Not in our library

  222. 222.

    Zhao A Balakrishnan G Durand F Guttag JV Dalca AV Data augmentation using learned transformations for one-shot medical image segmentation. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2019 ). p. 8543–53.

    Not in our library

  223. 223.

    Chaitanya K Karani N Baumgartner C Donati O Becker A Konukoglu E Semi-supervised and task-driven data augmentation. In: Chung ACS Gee JC Yushkevich PA Bao S, editors. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference—IPMI, 2019, Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Hong Kong (2019 ). p. 29–41.

    Not in our library

  224. 224.

    Bai W Oktay O Sinclair M Suzuki H Rajchl M Tarroni G Semi-supervised learning for network-based cardiac MR image segmentation. In: Descoteaux M Maier-Hein L Franz AM Jannin P Collins DL Duchesne S, editors. Proceedings, Part II of the 20th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2017. Vol. 10434. Quebec City, QC: Springer International Publishing (2017 ). p. 253–60.

    Not in our library

  225. 225.

    Can YB Chaitanya K Mustafa B Koch LM Konukoglu E Baumgartner CF Learning to segment medical images with scribble-supervision alone. In: Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 236–44.

    Not in our library

  226. 226.

    Kervadec H Dolz J Tang M Granger E Boykov Y Ben Ayed I. Constrained-CNN losses for weakly supervised segmentation. Med Image Anal. (2019 ) 54:88–99.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2019.02.009

  227. 227.

    Bai W Chen C Tarroni G Duan J Guitton F Petersen SE Self-supervised learning for cardiac MR image segmentation by anatomical position prediction. In: Shen D Liu T Peters TM Staib LH Essert C Zhou S Yap P-T Khan A, editors. Proceedings, Part II of the 22nd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, 2019. Shenzhen: Springer International Publishing (2019 ). p. 541–9.

    Not in our library

  228. 228.

    Dou Q Liu Q Heng PA Glocker B. Unpaired multi-modal segmentation via knowledge distillation. arxiv (2020 ) abs/2001.0311. Available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.03111

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2019.2963882

  229. 229.

    Ouyang C Kamnitsas K Biffi C Duan J Rueckert D Data efficient unsupervised domain adaptation for cross-modality image segmentation. In: Shen D Liu T Peters TM Staib LH Essert C Zhou S Yap P-T Khan A, editors. 22nd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2019. Shenzhen: Springer International Publishing (2019 ). p. 669–77.

    Not in our library

  230. 230.

    Chen J Zhang H Zhang Y Zhao S Mohiaddin R Wong T Discriminative consistent domain generation for semi-supervised learning. In: Shen D Liu T Peters TM Staib LH Essert C Zhou S Yap P Khan A, editors. 22nd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2019, Vol. 11765. Shenzhen: Springer (2019 ). p. 595–604.

    Not in our library

  231. 231.

    Dou Q Castro DC Kamnitsas K Glocker B Domain generalization via model-agnostic learning of semantic features. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019. Vancouver, BC (2019 ). p. 6447–58. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13580

    Not in our library

  232. 232.
  233. 233.

    Zhang L Wang X Yang D Sanford T Harmon S Turkbey B When unseen domain generalization is unnecessary? Rethinking data augmentation. arxiv (2019 ) abs/1906.03347. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03347 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  234. 234.

    Mahapatra D Bozorgtabar B Thiran JP Reyes M Efficient active learning for image classification and segmentation using a sample selection and conditional generative adversarial network. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2018. Granada: Springer International Publishing (2018 ). p. 580–8.

    Not in our library

  235. 235.

    Castro FM Marín-Jiménez MJ Guil N Schmid C Alahari K End-to-end incremental learning. In: Ferrari V Hebert M Sminchisescu C Weiss Y, editors. Computer Vision—ECCV 2018 - 15th European Conference. Munich: Springer (2018 ). p. 241–57.

    Not in our library

  236. 236.

    Szegedy C Zaremba W Sutskever I Bruna J Erhan D Goodfellow I Intriguing properties of neural networks. In: 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Conference Track Proceedings. Banff, AB (2014 ). p. 1–10.

    Not in our library

  237. 237.

    Kurakin A Goodfellow I Bengio S Adversarial examples in the physical world. In: 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Workshop Track Proceedings. Toulon (2017 ). p. 1–14.

    Not in our library

  238. 238.

    Goodfellow IJ Shlens J Szegedy C Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2015 ). p. 43405. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572

    Not in our library

  239. 239.

    Finlayson SG Bowers JD Ito J Zittrain JL Beam AL Kohane IS. Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning. Science. (2019 ) 363:1287–9.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aaw4399

  240. 240.

    Robinson R Valindria VV Bai W Oktay O Kainz B Suzuki H. Automated quality control in image segmentation: application to the UK biobank cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. (2019 ) 21:18.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12968-019-0523-x

  241. 241.

    Heo J Lee HB Kim S Lee J Kim KJ Yang E Uncertainty-aware attention for reliable interpretation and prediction. In: Bengio S Wallach HM Larochelle H Grauman K Cesa-Bianchi N Garnett R, editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018, NeurIPS 2018. Montréal, QC: Curran Associates Inc (2018 ). p. 909–18.

    Not in our library

  242. 242.
  243. 243.

    Tarroni G Oktay O Bai W Schuh A Suzuki H Passerat-Palmbach J. Learning-based quality control for cardiac MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2019 ) 38:1127–38.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2018.2878509

  244. 244.

    Peng B Zhang L Evaluation of image segmentation quality by adaptive ground truth composition. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2012 ). p. 287–300.

    Not in our library

  245. 245.

    Zhou L Deng W Wu X Robust image segmentation quality assessment without ground truth. arxiv (2019 ) abs/1903.08773. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08773 (accessed September 1, 2019).

    Not in our library

  246. 246.

    Alansary A Folgoc LL Vaillant G Oktay O Li Y Bai W Automatic view planning with multi-scale deep reinforcement learning agents. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI, 2018. Springer (2018 ). p. 277–85.

    Not in our library

  247. 247.

    Dangi S Linte CA Yaniv Z. Cine cardiac MRI slice misalignment correction towards full 3D left ventricle segmentation. In: Fei B Webster RJ. Medical Imaging 2018: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling. Houston, TX: SPIE (2018 ). p. 1057607.

    Not in our library10.1117/12.2294936

  248. 248.

    Tarroni G Oktay O Sinclair M Bai W Schuh A Suzuki H A comprehensive approach for learning-based fully-automated inter-slice motion correction for short-axis cine cardiac MR image stacks. In: Frangi AF Schnabel JA Davatzikos C Alberola-López C Fichtinger G, editors. 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2018. Granada (2018 ). p. 268–76.

    Not in our library

  249. 249.

    Oksuz I Clough J Bai W Ruijsink B Puyol-Antón E Cruz G High-quality segmentation of low quality cardiac MR images using k-space artefact correction. In: Cardoso MJ Feragen A Glocker B Konukoglu E Oguz I Unal G, editors. International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, MIDL, 2019. London: PMLR (2019 ). p. 380–9.

    Not in our library

  250. 250.

    Meng Q Sinclair M Zimmer V Hou B Rajchl M Toussaint N. Weakly supervised estimation of shadow confidence maps in fetal ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2019 ) 38:2755–67.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2019.2913311

  251. 251.

    Wolterink JM Leiner T Viergever MA Isgum I. Generative adversarial networks for noise reduction in low-dose CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2017 ) 36:2536–45.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2017.2708987

  252. 252.

    Irvin J Rajpurkar P Ko M Yu Y Ciurea-Ilcus S Chute C CheXpert: a large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison. In: The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019, The Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019. Honolulu, HI: AAAI Press (2019 ). p. 590–7.

    Not in our library10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301590

  253. 253.

    Dwork C Roth A The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundat Trends Theor Comput Sci. (2014 ) 9:211–407.

    Not in our library10.1561/0400000042

  254. 254.

    Abadi M Chu A Goodfellow IJ McMahan HB Mironov I Talwar K Deep learning with differential privacy. In: The 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security Vienna (2016 ). p. 308–18.

    Not in our library

  255. 255.

    Bonawitz K Ivanov V Kreuter B Marcedone A McMahan HB Patel S Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In: The 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2017. Dallas, TX (2017 ). p. 1175–91.

    Not in our library

  256. 256.

    Ryffel T Trask A Dahl M Wagner B Mancuso J Rueckert D A generic framework for privacy preserving deep learning. In: Privacy Preserving Machine Learning (2018 ). p. 1–8.

    Not in our library

  257. 257.

    Papernot N A Marauder's map of security and privacy in machine learning: an overview of current and future research directions for making machine learning secure and private. In: The 11th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security, CCS 2018. Toronto, ON (2018 ). p. 1.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.