No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.
Bacterial Vaginosis: What Do We Currently Know?
Linda Abou Chacra, Florence Fenollar, Khoudia Diop
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · 2022 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
The vaginal microbiome is a well-defined compartment of the human microbiome. It has unique conditions, characterized by the dominance of one bacterial species, the Lactobacilli. This microbiota manifests itself by a low degree of diversity and by a strong dynamic of change in its composition under the influence of various exogenous and endogenous factors. The increase in diversity may paradoxically be associated with dysbiosis, such as bacterial vaginosis (BV). BV is the result of a disturbance in the vaginal ecosystem; i.e., a sudden replacement of Lactobacilli by anaerobic bacteria such as Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis , and others. It is the most common cause of vaginal discharge in women of childbearing age, approximately 30% of all causes. The etiology of this dysbiosis remains unknown, but its health consequences are significant, including obstetrical complications, increased risk of sexually transmitted infections and urogenital infections. Its diagnosis is based on Amsel’s clinical criteria and/or a gram stain based on the Nugent score. While both of these methods have been widely applied worldwide for approximately three decades, Nugent score are still considered the “gold standard” of BV diagnostic tools. Given the limitations of these tools, methods based on molecular biology have been developed as alternative rational strategies for the diagnosis of BV. The treatment of BV aims at restoring the balance of the vaginal flora to stop the proliferation of harmful microorganisms. Prescription of antibiotics such as metronidazole, clindamycin, etc. is recommended. Faced with the considerable uncertainty about the cause of BV, the high rate of recurrence, the unacceptable treatment options, and clinical management which is often insensitive and inconsistent, research on this topic is intensifying. Knowledge of its composition and its associated variations represents the key element in improving the therapeutic management of patients with the most suitable treatments possible.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
1 Introduction
The vaginal microbial community is complex and dynamic, consisting of a group of bacteria typically characterized by abundant Lactobacilli that evolve during the life of the woman, depending on age, hormonal estrogen levels, sexual practices and the environment. The vaginal microbiota plays a crucial role in women’s health (infection, reproduction…), and that of their fetuses.
BV is a dysbiosis of the vaginal microbiota characterized by a shift from Lactobacilli dominance to that of a mixture of various anaerobic bacteria. It is the most common vaginal disorder worldwide in women of childbearing age. BV is associated with significant adverse healthcare outcomes, including increased susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections, urogenital infections, pelvic inflammatory disease, and an increased risk of abnormal pregnancy. The etiology of BV is still unknown. Standard antibiotic therapy often fails, with an estimated relapse rate of 50% at six months follow-up.
2 Normal Healthy Vaginal Flora
The vaginal ecosystem is colonized from the very first hours of the birth of a female and remains throughout her life until death. Women of childbearing age produce about 1 to 4 mL of vaginal fluid, containing 108 to 109 bacterial cells per mL.
2.1 Composition of Normal Vaginal Flora
The vaginal flora was first described by the German gynecologist Albert Döderlein in 1892, who reported a homogeneous vaginal flora of gram-positive bacilli in healthy women. They were named “Döderlein’s bacilli” and were later identified as members of the Lactobacillus genus by Beijerink in 1901. Under normal conditions, 70-90% of the vaginal bacterial species in healthy premenopausal women are Lactobacilli. As molecular techniques have advanced, our understanding of the diversity and complexity of the vaginal bacterial community has broadened. Among more than 200 Lactobacillus species with standing in the nomenclature, over 20 species have been found in the vaginal flora. Sequencing of the 16 rRNA gene revealed that the vaginal bacterial community, mainly composed of Lactobacilli, is classified into five groups named community state types, namely I, II, III, IV and V. Four of these groups are dominated by Lactobacillus. The first is dominated by L. crispatus, the second by L. gasseri, the third by L. iners, and the fifth by L. jensenii, while the fourth contains a smaller proportion of Lactobacilli but is composed of a polymicrobial mixture of strict and facultative anaerobes (Gardnerella, Atopobium, Mobiluncus, Prevotella…). Although there is always a temporal transition between vaginal bacterial communities ( Figure 1 ).
Thus, many other bacteria are present at lower concentrations in healthy vaginal flora, such as Peptostreptococcus, Bacteroides, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus, and Peptococcus.
The composition of the vaginal microbiota evolves throughout a woman’s lifespan. Various physical and hormonal changes occur in the vagina biotope during these different stages of a woman’s life ( Figure 2 ).
2.2 Variability of Vaginal Flora According to Ethnicity
Vaginal bacterial communities of women of childbearing age may vary between women from different regions, but also between women of different ethnicities living in the same geographical area. In 2011, a study by Ravel et al. characterized the vaginal microbiota of asymptomatic North American women with pyrosequencing, showing that the vaginal flora of Asian and white American women was dominated by Lactobacilli, unlike Hispanic and African-American women, of whom only 60% had a Lactobacillus -dominated vaginal flora. In addition, Caucasian and Asian women tend to have high levels of L. crispatus and lower levels of L. iners compared to African women. In another study using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, Fettweis et al. demonstrated that the vaginal microbiota of European-ancestry women was dominated by Lactobacilli, as opposed to African-American women, who presented a mixed vaginal community containing, among others, Mycoplasma hominis, Aerococcus, L. iners and numerous strict anaerobes, including gram-positive anaerobic cocci, BV-associated bacteria, Sneathia, Prevotella amnii, Megasphaera, Atopobium, and Gardnerella vaginalis. The vaginal pH also differs between racial groups. African-American and Hispanic women had a vaginal pH (4.7 and 5.0, respectively) higher than what is considered the norm (<4.5).
2.3 Role of the Vaginal Microbiota in Women’s Health
The vaginal flora presents one of the most important defense mechanisms for reproductive function and maintaining a healthy environment. The stability of this flora prevents the proliferation of commensal microorganisms and colonization by pathogens, thereby preventing infection. Bacteria form a adhered monolayer on the vaginal mucosa and produce antimicrobial compounds that maintain this health equilibrium, such as hydrogen peroxide (antimicrobial product protecting against deleterious microorganisms), lactic acid (which maintains the normal vaginal pH between 3.5 to 4.5), bacteriocins (antibiotics that inhibit the growth of harmful microorganisms within the vagina), and arginine deaminase enzyme (metabolizes arginine into citrulline and ammonia (NH3), depriving anaerobic pathogens of this amino acid necessary for their growth).
Notably, L. crispatus and L. jensenii may produce hydrogen peroxide, an oxidizing agent, toxic for catalase-negative bacteria and also capable in vitro of inhibiting HIV-1 and herpes simplex virus type 2. The vaginal acids produced can, in the presence of viral RNA, stimulate the maturation of dendritic cells, activation of 17 subclasses of T helper lymphocytes, and the production of protective inflammatory cytokines and interferon-γ.
In addition to the role of Lactobacilli, cervical mucus is mainly composed of mucin, which protects the vaginal mucosa and optimizes its barrier role against microbial colonization. Analyses of the composition of cervical mucus and vaginal secretions have demonstrated the presence of several proteins with antimicrobial activities that act independently of the presence of antibodies, such as lactoferrin, lysosyme, calprotectin [also known as MRP8/MRP14 (“myeloid related protein”)], cathelicidin LL-37.
3.1 Background
Formerly known as non-specific vaginitis, BV is characterized by a change in the vaginal flora composition, with a dramatic depletion of Lactobacilli due to a significant overgrowth of obligate or facultative anaerobes previously a minority in the vagina, such as Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Prevotella, Peptoniphilus, Megasphaera, Mobiluncus, and several fastidious and uncultured bacteria, including BV-associated bacteria (BVAB-1 to 3). The factor triggering this overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria is unknown. It is linked to an alkaline vaginal ecosystem due to an increase of vaginal pH following the loss of Lactobacilli protective effects ( Figure 3 ).
The diversity of the vaginal flora in patients with BV was described in 1921 by Schröder. In 1955, Gardner and Dukes claimed that the etiological agent of BV was Haemophilus vaginalis, a gram-negative rod later renamed Gardnerella vaginalis. The bacteria present in the microbiota of BV form a biofilm on the vaginal epithelium and secrete a cytotoxin capable of killing the epithelial cells. In addition, G.vaginalis produce proteolytic enzymes able to degrade proteins and decarboxylases that convert amino acids. Not being degraded, the amine compounds become malodorous (fishy odor: “Whiff test”) thank to an increase of the vaginal pH. Subsequently, cytotoxicity resulting from the combination of organic acids present in the vagina during BV and bacterial polyamines leads to the production of a vaginal discharge caused by the exfoliation of vaginal epithelial cells. Furthermore, this bacterium, cover the vaginal epithelial cells, causing the formation of “clue-cells”, a specific characteristic of BV.
A few years later, G. vaginalis was found in 40% of healthy women, and its role was disputed. Thus, colonization of G. vaginalis does not always promote BV, suggesting that this bacterium alone may be essential but not sufficient for BV development. In addition to G. vaginalis, some anaerobic bacteria are highly associated with BV, indicating that BV is a polymicrobial syndrome, which does not follow Koch’s postulates.
Recent progress in research of BV pathogenesis have determined the existence of 13 different species within the genus Gardnerella. Although these Gardnerella species may be closely linked genetically, only a few of them may be implicated in disease such as BV. Healthy women may be colonized by non-pathogenic Gardnerella species, whereas virulent strains are involved in the development of BV. Advances in technology, particularly next-generation sequencing, have clarified much of this issue. Arguably, all papers dealing with G. vaginalis prior to that of Vaneechoutte et al. are not specifically about G. vaginalis but rather about Gardnerella spp.
Based on a recent prospective study, an updated conceptual model on the pathogenesis of BV was outlined. The potential synergistic relationship between G. vaginalis, P. bivia, A. vaginae was studied. After sexual exposure to virulent strains of G. vaginalis, these strains displace vaginal Lactobacilli and begin to form a BV biofilm on the vaginal epithelium. Subsequently, proteolysis by G. vaginalis occurs which promotes the growth of P. bivia. This bacterium produces an ammonia product which in turn promotes the growth of G. vaginalis and the biofilm develops. These 2 bacteria then produce sialidase that degrades the biofilm and P. bivia may thus degrade the mucin layer of the vaginal epithelium. After the loss of the protective mucus layer, increased adhesion of other BV-associated bacteria, including A. vaginae, to the polymicrobial biofilm will occur. The role of the other bacteria remains unknown. Further research focusing on the complex interactions between bacteria during BV is needed.
3.2 Diagnosis
BV ranges from asymptomatic to an increase in vaginal discharge with or without a fishy odor. The collection of a specimen for diagnosis can be performed using a speculum during the pelvic exam. When there is no reason for a pelvic exam as part of the clinical evaluation, a self-collected vaginal swab may also be provided.
3.2.1 Amsel Criteria and Nugent’s Score
Two main categories of diagnostic strategies for BV exist: the “bedside” method introduced in 1983, mainly based on real-time clinical criteria –”Amsel’s criteria”, and laboratory-based testing developed in 1991, relying on the evaluation of morphotypes on gram staining – “ Nugent’s score”. Amsel’s criteria and Nugent’s score are the most common diagnostic methods used for BV. Furthermore, the World Health Organization (WHO) has considered the Nugent’s score as a gold standard for studies. However, the current recommended best clinical practice for diagnosing BV in women is gram staining microscopy according to the Hay-Ison criteria, as it is easier and faster to use. The Hay-Ison criteria were analogous to the Nugent’s scores. Hay’s grades I, II, and III were similar to Nugent’s scores 0-3, 4-6, and 7-10.
Even if Nugent’s score is considered as a gold standard by the WHO, it has some pitfalls. In fact, intermediate flora is so far an uncharacterized category and is a challenge in the diagnosis of BV. In addition, the identification of morphotypes is subjective and technician-dependent, thus the diagnosis may be influenced by individual skills and experience.
Recently, a study made by Wang et al. provided a proof of concept for a deep learning-based model to quantify Gram staining and, consequently, automated Nugent score classification. Deep learning methods, particularly convolutional neural network (CNN) models, have demonstrated excellent performance in computer vision tasks. This model outperformed human healthcare professionals in terms of accuracy and stability for three diagnostic categories of Nugent scores. The deep learning model may offer translational applications in automating the diagnosis of BV with appropriate supporting hardware.
3.2.2 Molecular Diagnostic Technique
The diagnosis of BV is problematic and challenging because of its intricate polymicrobial features and a wide range of clinical features. In order to overcome these diagnostic problems, alternative diagnostic strategies have been attempted, such as molecular, enzymatic and chromatographic techniques.
A molecular technique used in the diagnosis of BV is specific quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) test. It is a quantitative, reproducible and reliable molecular biology tool that measures the presence of bacteria presents in BV, such as Atopobium vaginae, BVAB2, Gardnerella vaginalis, Leptotrichia/Sneathia spp., Megasphaera spp., and Mobiluncus spp….. Many studies proposed objective molecular cut-off values from bacterial load to predict BV.
Several commercially molecular diagnostic assays have been reported for the diagnosis of BV in women including the NuSwab R multiplex quantitative PCR, SureSwab BV DNA real-time quantitative assay, BD Max vaginal panel and BV multiplex assay. The quantification of these bacteria therefore makes it possible to establish a precise diagnosis of BV, with a sensitivity ranging from 90.5% to 96.7% and a specificity ranging from 85.8% to 95% compared to Amsel criteria and Nugent score.
Even though these tests have a higher sensitivity and specificity than the currently available diagnostic tools, they are not point-of-care tests and are more expensive. However, Dessai et al. are the first to report on the performance of the BD AffirmTM VPIII test as a POCT in a prenatal population. But the test has been shown to be inadequate as a screening test for vaginal infections in pregnancy.
Finally, POC tests for BV are not available or are simply too expensive to be used routinely. It is therefore mandatory that the development and evaluation of new diagnostic tests include a cost analysis.
3.2.3 Other Emerging Strategies
As the presence of sialidase is currently considered a key indicator of BV in the clinical examination, an enzymatic approach has been developed: The OSOM R BVBlue R test as a POC diagnostic test for BV. It is based on the qualitative detection of a high level of sialidase produced by anaerobic pathogens in vaginal fluid samples. It has been shown to be reliable compared to conventional methods such as Amsel criteria and Nugent score
In addition, a recent study by Liu et al., showed the feasibility of turn-on tetravalent sialic acid-coated tetraphenylethene luminogen (TPE4S) as a powerful diagnostic tool for high-throughput fluorescence-guided diagnosis of BV. This study uses light signal intensity to detect and measure the relative concentration of sialidase in a vaginal sample. All reagents are present in a reagent bead and sample buffer, essentially allowing for a one-step test. The test is highly sensitive and quantitative, with a sensitivity and specificity of 95.40% and 94.94%, respectively, compared to the Amsel method and 92.5% and 91.8% compared to the BVBlue diagnostic results. Notably, this method gives a more accurate classification and quantification of BV severity based on relative fluorescence intensity (I/I0). Thus this test can be a potential tool for diagnosis of BV, and risk assessment of patients with BV based on sialidase activity levels and monitoring of antibiotic therapy.
Another new approach based on immunodetection also targeting sialidase has been developed for the diagnosis of BV. The nanophotonic operating principle of this biodetection method allows a cheaper, faster and simpler analysis than the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This nanotechnology has a high sensitivity and specificity (96,29%, respectively). This method offers an original approach to perform a very rapid diagnosis of BV.
3.3 Epidemiology and Risk Factors
BV may appear at any reproductive age (between 15 to 44 years-old). Its prevalence rates vary considerably among the geographic regions of the world, within the same country, and even within the same population, depending on ethnic origin and socioeconomic status. Although its exact prevalence remains difficult to determine, BV occurs between 4-75%, depending on the population studied. Intermediate in the USA (29%), the prevalence of BV is estimated to be low in Europe, with a maximum (> 20%) in Poland and Norway. In Africa, the estimated prevalence tends to be high. However, BV prevalence is lowest in west Africa (6-8% in Burkina Faso, 14.2% in Nigeria) than southern and eastern Africa: 32.5% in Zimbabwe, 37% in Kenya, 38% in Botswana, and 68.3% in Mozambique.
3.3.1 Sexual Practices
Although the absence of a known causal agent makes it difficult to characterize BV as a sexually transmitted infection (STI), it is strongly associated with sexual activities and has some characteristics of a sexually transmitted disease not by microorganism transfer, but by mechanical or chemical interaction such as contact with highly alkaline semen. Overall, BV is diagnosed in post-pubertal women who have never been sexually active, but at a lower prevalence than those who are sexually active. The prevalence varies with the number of sex partners. It has been evaluated at 18.8% for non-sexually active women, 22.4% for women with one lifetime partner and 43.4% and 58% for women having 2-3 lifetime sex partners and those having ≥ 4-lifetime sex partners, respectively.
In this dynamic, sex workers had a higher bacterial vaginal diversity but a much lower abundance of Lactobacillus species than women who are not engaged in sex work. Compared with male partners of healthy women, BV-related bacteria can be found in the penile skin, urethra, spermatozoa, and prostatic fluid microbiota of male partners of women with BV. Furthermore, biofilm fragments have been found in their urine and sperm, suggesting that male partners are a reservoir, and also that heterosexual transmission may occur. Nevertheless, there is no corresponding illness in male partners. Use of condoms by male partners also prevents acquisition and recurrence of BV. Also, since the preputial area of some men hosts BV-associated microorganisms, male circumcision may reduce the risk of BV.
Prevalence rates also depend on the nature of the couple and their sexual practices. In fact, BV prevalence varies between 10-30% in heterosexual women, and is more frequent, 25-50%, in women who have sex with women (WSW). The reasons for this difference in prevalence are not clear, although sexual activities involving the transmission of vaginal fluid increase the risk of BV acquisition. Several studies have indicated that certain sexual behaviors, including non-coital sexual practices such as digital and penile penetration, anal and oral intercourse followed by vaginal penetration, enhance the risk of BV. In WSW, a symptomatic female sexual partner, receptive oral sex, and the use and sharing of unwashed sex toys constitute risk factors for BV. These observations have led some to consider BV as not an infection, but rather a taxonomic change in the vaginal microbiota resulting from translocation of oral or fecal microbiota during non-coital sexual practices.
3.3.2 Other Bacterial Vaginosis Risk Factors
Additionally, genital hygiene can also promote disequilibrium in the vaginal microbiota. One study found that patients who did not wash their vaginal region were more susceptible to BV than those who often washed the vaginal region, a prevalence of 53.9% and 40.2%, respectively. Similarly, the prevalence of BV is higher in patients who do not change their underpants frequently compared to those who change it more frequently (57.6% versus 36.9%). In addition, other sexual sanitary habits, including vaginal douching and washing, as well as cigarette smoking, certain contraceptive methods like disposable intra-uterine devices and stress may also enhance the risk of developing BV.
3.4 Bacterial Vaginosis Complications and Women’s Health
Women with BV are vulnerable: the presence of BV-related bacteria and/or sexually transmissible microorganisms in the BV microbiota can lead to opportunistic infections. During this imbalance, 10-30% of pregnant women with BV give birth prematurely, a preterm delivery often accompanied by perinatal mortality, up to 70% worldwide. During pregnancy, BV increases the risk of preterm labor, late miscarriage, intrauterine fetal death, preterm rupture of the membranes, amniotic fluid infections, chorioamnionitis, post-abortion and postpartum infections in these women.
In non-pregnant women, bacteria involved in BV can initially cause cervicitis, endometritis, salpingitis, and urinary tract infections. After damage of the cervix, bacteria can migrate from the lower to upper genital tract, reaching the uterus and fallopian tubes and causing illnesses such as pelvic inflammatory disease, post-hysterectomy infections, and even cervical cancer or tubal infertility (van; ). Likewise, BV is associated with significantly increased rates of acquiring herpes simplex virus, human immunodeficiency virus, papillomavirus and transmission of the pathogens causing syphilis, chancroid, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis, and chlamydia.
3.5 Treatment and Management of Bacterial Vaginosis
Considering that clinical cure corresponds to the disappearance of all symptoms, the treatment of BV is currently focused on stopping the proliferation of BV-associated microorganisms and restoring the normal vaginal flora. Typically, clinical therapies include the use of antibiotics with broad activity against anaerobic microbes and protozoa: clindamycin and the nitroimidazoles (metronidazole and tinidazole) and/or use of probiotics.
3.5.1 Antibiotic Therapies
The first line of therapy recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) is 500 mg oral metronidazole twice daily for one week. However, treatment with metronidazole may cause side effects such as gastrointestinal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Other proposed therapeutic regimens include 300 mg oral clindamycin twice daily for one week, 100 mg of intravaginal clindamycin ovule daily for 5 days and an application of 0.75% intravaginal metronidazole gel for 5 days or 2% of intravaginal clindamycin cream at bedtime for one week. However, it should be noted that local application of clindamycin may damage latex-based products such as condoms and may also trigger pseudomembranous colitis.
In addition, the use of tinidazole, a drug similar to metronidazole, has been approved and proposed as an alternative therapy in an oral regimen (either 2 g/day for 2 days or 1g/day for 5 days) if metronidazole and clindamycin are not tolerated.
Some researchers have evaluated the efficacy of other antimicrobial agents, such as azithromycin, secnidazole or ornidazole and rifaximin. Secnidazole has shown activity similar to that of the recommended nitroimidazoles and also spares Lactobacilli, a beneficial characteristic in BV treatment. Even for Rifaximin, it acts on BV by restoring Lactobacilli and increasing lactic acid in patients.
Taken locally or orally, these antimicrobial agents have almost similar efficacy, with cure rates around 58% to 92% after 1 month of treatment. Nevertheless, these results are temporary, leading to recurrence or re-infection at rates above 50% within 6-12 months of treatment. The reasons for this high relapse rate remain unclear. However, it appears that, with the formation of bacterial biofilms, these recommended therapies only temporarily eradicated BV-associated microorganisms, or these bacteria are reintroduced in the vagina by their sex partners. Further, the presence of some BV-associated bacteria such as Peptoniphilus lacrimalis, Megasphaera type 2 and BVAB-1 to 3 at the beginning of treatment is strongly related to BV recurrence, thus causing antibiotic failure. To this end, two recent studies have examined the acceptability, tolerability, and especially the efficacy of concomitant partner treatment to improve the cure of BV. The first study by Schwebke et al, showed no significant reduction in BV recurrence in female partners after treatment of the male partner with multidose metronidazole, although women whose partners adhered to multidose metronidazole were less likely to fail treatment. The second study showed that simultaneous partner treatment had a significant change in the overall composition of genital microbiota in both partners immediately after treatment.
3.5.2 Non-Antibiotic Therapies
As antibiotic treatments can have a negative impact on the stability of the vaginal flora, Lactobacillus probiotics, an alternative and complementary therapy to antibiotic treatment, has been developed to help restore and maintain the healthy vaginal flora. Probiotics consist of living microorganisms that confer a health benefit on the host when they are administered in an appropriate quantity. Nine studies from 1989 to 2014 tested the effectiveness of vaginal or oral Lactobacillus probiotics. The results showed that both oral and vaginal Lactobacillus treatments were effective in curing acute BV. On balance, the application of Lactobacillus in the form of vaginal capsules (containing≥108 CFU of Lactobacillus strains per dose) or a fermented milk product (containing≥5×109 CFU of Lactobacillus strains per dose) may be an equally effective alternative to standard antibiotic capsules. Only the strains L. reuteri RC-14 and L. rhamnonus GR-1 have positive clinical effects (; Ouarabi et al., 2017). Administrated orally (twice daily) or vaginally (once weekly), probiotics may restore the normal Lactobacillus-dominated microbiota and reduce BV recurrence. Nevertheless, probiotics have had minimal success in African women.
In the same context, a new study on the applicability of three strains of Lactobacillus spp. (Lactobacillus delbrueckii DM8909, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC14917 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZX27) according to their in vitro probiotic capacities. These three Lactobacillus spp. strains have shown efficacy in the treatment of BV by limiting the growth, adhesion, biofilm formation and virulence properties of G. vaginalis.
In addition, sucrose-containing products may promote recolonization, since sucrose is metabolized by Lactobacilli. A triple-blind randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy of a sucrose vaginal gel versus a metronidazole vaginal gel for 5 days in 70 women with diagnosed BV. The sucrose vaginal gel was as effective as metronidazole treatment, according to this individual RCT.
Another option is to combine Lactobacilli with estriol. Two studies, a PC-RCT and a head-to-head RCT, were conducted on the efficacy of vaginal capsules containing L. acidophilus and 0.03 mg estriol (Gynofor®) in BV. Compared to placebo, the cure rate of BV was significantly higher in the treated group, but according to the comparative study, the combination of estriol and Lactobacilli is equivalent, but not better, results than antibiotic treatment.
In terms of method of application, vaginal suppositories deposit Lactobacillus strains directly on the vaginal mucosa, whereas oral probiotics survive gastrointestinal transit and increase the number of strains in the colon and feces. In turn, this may promote recolonization of the vagina due to the proximity of the rectum and vagina.
3.5.3 New Emerging Therapies
The management of BV urgently requires implementation of new therapeutic strategies. To disrupt BV-associated biofilms, studies are underway to investigate the role of novel agents such as DNases, retrocyclines, antiseptics, and plant-derived compounds in the treatment of BV. Dequalinium chloride, an antiseptic, has reported similar efficacy to clindamycin intravaginal cream. Thymol, a molecule found in thyme essential oil, has shown an inhibitory effect on biofilms in vitro. The application of acidifying agents, such as vitamin C or buffering agents (polycarbophil or boric acid), in combination with a nitroimidazole antibiotic, has been demonstrated to reduce the recurrence of BV, potentially by destructuring the vaginal biofilm.
In this regard, other promising therapeutic agents for the treatment of BV are under investigation. Including DNase agents that can disrupt vaginal biofilms by targeting extracellular DNA essential for their structural integrity, retrocyclin 101, a synthetic cyclic antimicrobial peptide that inhibits the growth and development of G. vaginalis in vitro, and the amphoteric tenside pessary (WO3191), which disrupts biofilms after metronidazole treatment and promotes the growth of Lactobacillus species.
Furthermore, given the success demonstrated by fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in the management of various intestinal disorders and diseases such as recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, pseudomembranous colitis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), the use of vaginal microbiota transplantation (VMT) in BV treatment is a new therapeutic approach that modulates the vaginal microbiota in order to eradicate this scourge and reduce adverse gynecological outcomes.
Given the high rates of recurrence and relapse, research is needed to identify and evaluate these novel biofilm-disrupting treatment strategies.
4 Conclusions and Perspectives
The taxonomic composition and bacterial proportion of the vaginal microbiota are under the influence of intrinsic and external factors over the female lifespan. In the last decades, understanding of the bacterial diversity of this ecosystem has been increased by molecular methods. Dominated by Lactobacilli that protect against infection, the vaginal flora of healthy women is less complex than that of patients with BV, which presents a diverse microbiota containing numerous obligate anaerobic and uncultivable species. This polymicrobial condition is associated with relatively uncomplicated clinical symptoms that do not occur in all affected women, thus complicating the determination of its etiology. Treatment is usually unsuccessful, with a high rate of relapse. Future studies that thoroughly examine the vaginal bacterial community are needed to cultivate the bacteria associated with BV and its treatment failure, in order to study antibiotic resistance and to establish more effective alternative therapeutic strategies that reduce BV symptoms as well as its associated complications. Overall, unlocking the enigma of the pathogenesis of BV is key for the prevention and management of this public health problem.
Author Contributions
LAC, FF, and KD have equally contributed to the preparation of this manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was funded by the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Méditerranée Infection, the National Research Agency under the “Investissements d’avenir” programme, reference ANR-10-IAHU-03, the Region Provence Alpes Côte d’Azur and European FEDER PRIMI funding.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References 160
- 1.
Achilles S. L. Austin M. N. Meyn L. A. Mhlanga F. Chirenje Z. M. Hillier S. L. (2018 ). Impact of Contraceptive Initiation on Vaginal Microbiota. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 218 (6), 622–e15
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.017
- 2.
Afolabi B. B. Moses O. E. Oduyebo O. O. (2016 ). “Bacterial Vaginosis and Pregnancy Outcome in Lagos, Nigeria,” in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, vol. 3. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), ofw030
Not in our library10.1093/ofid/ofw030
- 3.
Africa C. W. J. Nel J. Stemmet M. (2014 ). Anaerobes and Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnancy: Virulence Factors Contributing to Vaginal Colonisation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11 (7), 6979–70005
Not in our library10.3390/ijerph110706979
- 4.
Aldunate M. Tyssen D. Johnson A. Zakir T. Sonza S. Moench T.. (2013 ). Vaginal Concentrations of Lactic Acid Potently Inactivate HIV. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68 (9), 2015–2255
Not in our library10.1093/jac/dkt156
- 5.
Algburi A. Zhang Y. Weeks R. Comito N. Zehm S. Pinto J.. (2017 ). Gemini Cationic Amphiphiles Control Biofilm Formation by Bacterial Vaginosis Pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61 (12), e00650–e00175
Not in our library10.1128/aac.00650-17
- 6.
Alves P. Castro J. Sousa C. Cereija T. B. Cerca N. (2014 ). Gardnerella Vaginalis Outcompetes 29 Other Bacterial Species Isolated From Patients With Bacterial Vaginosis, Using in an in Vitro Biofilm Formation Model. J. Infect. Dis. 210 (4), 593–965
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiu131
- 7.
Amsel R. Totten P. A. Spiegel C. A. Chen K. C. S. Eschenbach D. Holmes K. K. (1983 ). Nonspecific Vaginitis: Diagnostic Criteria and Microbial and Epidemiologic Associations. Am. J. Med. 74 (1), 14–225
Not in our library10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9
- 8.
Antonucci F. Mirandola W. Fontana C. Fontana C. (2017 ). Comparison Between Nugent’s and Hay/Ison Scoring Criteria for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis in WASP Prepared Vaginal Samples. Clin. Investig. (Lond.) 7, 89–93
Not in our library10.4172/clinical-investigation.1000116
- 9.
Aslan E. Bechelaghem N. (2018 ). To ‘Douche’or Not to ‘Douche’: Hygiene Habits May Have Detrimental Effects on Vaginal Microbiota. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 38 (5), 678–815
Not in our library10.1080/01443615.2017.1395398
- 10.
Babu G. Ganvelu Singaravelu B. Srikumar R. Reddy S. V. (2017 ). Comparative Study on the Vaginal Flora and Incidence of Asymptomatic Vaginosis Among Healthy Women and in Women With Infertility Problems of Reproductive Age. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 11 (8), DC18
Not in our library10.7860/jcdr/2017/28296.10417
- 11.
Bacterial Vaginosis (2015 ) STD Treatment Guidelines. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/bv.html (Accessed April 14, 2018).
Not in our library
- 12.
Bagnall P. Rizzolo D. (2017 ). Bacterial Vaginosis: A Practical Review. J. Am. Acad. Physician Assist. 30 (12), 15–215
Not in our library10.1097/01.jaa.0000526770.60197.fa
- 13.
Beebout C. J. Eberly A. R. Werby S. H. Reasoner S. A. Brannon J. R. De S.. (2019 ). Respiratory Heterogeneity Shapes Biofilm Formation and Host Colonization in Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli. MBio 10 (2), e02400–e02185
Not in our library10.1128/mbio.02400-18
- 14.
Bilardi J. Walker S. McNair R. Mooney-Somers J. Temple-Smith M. Bellhouse C.. (2016 a). Women’s Management of Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis and Experiences of Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study. PLoS One 11 (3), e01517945
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0151794
- 15.
Bilardi J. Walker S. Mooney-Somers J. Temple-Smith M. McNair R. Bellhouse C.. (2016 b). Women’s Views and Experiences of the Triggers for Onset of Bacterial Vaginosis and Exacerbating Factors Associated With Recurrence. PLoS One 11 (3), e01502725
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0150272
- 16.
Bitew A. Abebaw Y. Bekele D. Mihret A. (2017 ). Prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis and Associated Risk Factors Among Women Complaining of Genital Tract Infection. Int. J. Microbiol. 2017, 4919404
Not in our library10.1155/2017/4919404
- 17.
Borges S. Silva J. Teixeira P. (2014 ). The Role of Lactobacilli and Probiotics in Maintaining Vaginal Health. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 289 (3), 479–895
Not in our library10.1007/s00404-013-3064-9
- 18.
Bradshaw C. S. Brotman R. M. (2015 ). Making Inroads Into Improving Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis–Striving for Long-Term Cure. BMC Infect. Dis. 15 (1), 1–125
Not in our library10.1186/s12879-015-1027-4
- 19.
Bradshaw C. S. Pirotta M. De Guingand D. Hocking J. S. Morton A. N. Garland S. M.. (2012 ). Efficacy of Oral Metronidazole With Vaginal Clindamycin or Vaginal Probiotic for Bacterial Vaginosis: Randomised Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Trial. PLoS One 7 (4), e345405
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0034540
- 20.
Bradshaw C. S. Sobel J. D. (2016 ). Current Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis—Limitations and Need for Innovation. J. Infect. Dis. 214 (suppl_1), S14–S20
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiw159
- 21.
Bradshaw C. S. Tabrizi S. N. Fairley C. K. Morton A. N. Rudland E. Garland S. M. (2006 ). The Association of Atopobium Vaginae and Gardnerella Vaginalis With Bacterial Vaginosis and Recurrence After Oral Metronidazole Therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 194 (6), 828–365
Not in our library10.1086/506621
- 22.
Braga P. C. Dal Sasso M. Culici M. Spallino A. (2010 ). Inhibitory Activity of Thymol on Native and Mature Gardnerella Vaginalis Biofilms: In Vitro Study. Arzneimittelforschung 60 (11), 675–815
Not in our library10.1055/s-0031-1296346
- 23.
Breding K. Selbing A. Farnebäck M. (2020 ). Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis Using a Novel Molecular Real-Time PCR Test. J. Womens Health Gynecol. 7, 1–7.
Not in our library
- 24.
Bretelle F. Rozenberg P. Pascal A. Favre R. Bohec C. Loundou A.. (2015 ). High Atopobium Vaginae and Gardnerella Vaginalis Vaginal Loads Are Associated With Preterm Birth. Clin. Infect. Dis. 60 (6), 860–675
Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciu966
- 25.
Briselden A. M. Moncla B. J. Stevens C. E. Hillier S. L. (1992 ). Sialidases (Neuraminidases) in Bacterial Vaginosis and Bacterial Vaginosis-Associated Microflora. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30 (3), 663–665
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.30.3.663-666.1992
- 26.
Brotman R. M. (2011 ). Vaginal Microbiome and Sexually Transmitted Infections: An Epidemiologic Perspective. J. Clin. Invest. 121 (12), 4610–4617
Not in our library10.1172/jci57172
- 27.
Brotman R. M. Shardell M. D. Gajer P. Kathleen Tracy J. Zenilman J. M. Ravel J.. (2014 ). Interplay Between the Temporal Dynamics of the Vaginal Microbiota and Human Papillomavirus Detection. J. Infect. Dis. 210 (11), 1723–1335
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiu330
- 28.
- 29.
Camus C. Penaranda G. Khiri H. Camiade S. Molet L. Lebsir M.. (2021 ). Acceptability and Efficacy of Vaginal Self-Sampling for Genital Infection and Bacterial Vaginosis: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One 16 (11), e02600215
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0260021
- 30.
Cartwright C. P. Lembke B. D. Ramachandran K. Body B. A. Nye M. B. Rivers C. A.. (2012 ). Development and Validation of a Semiquantitative, Multitarget PCR Assay for Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50 (7), 2321–2295
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.00506-12
- 31.
Cartwright C. P. Pherson A. J. Harris A. B. Clancey M. S. Nye M. B. (2018 ). Multicenter Study Establishing the Clinical Validity of a Nucleic-Acid Amplification–Based Assay for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 92 (3), 173–785
Not in our library10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.05.022
- 32.
Castro J. França A. Bradwell K. R. Serrano M. G. Jefferson K. K. Cerca N. (2017 ). Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Gardnerella Vaginalis Biofilms vs. Planktonic Cultures Using RNA-Seq. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 3 (1), 1–75
Not in our library10.1038/s41522-017-0012-7
- 33.
- 34.
Cherpes T. L. Hillier S. L. Meyn L. A. Busch J. L. Krohn M. A. (2008 ). A Delicate Balance: Risk Factors for Acquisition of Bacterial Vaginosis Include Sexual Activity, Absence of Hydrogen Peroxide-Producing Lactobacilli, Black Race, and Positive Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Serology. Sex. Transm. Dis. 35 (1), 78–835
Not in our library10.1097/olq.0b013e318156a5d0
- 35.
Coleman J. S. Gaydos C. A. (2018 ). Molecular Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis: An Update. J. Clin. Microbiol. 56 (9), e00342-18
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.00342-18
- 36.
Cristiano L. Rampello S. Noris C. Valota V. (1996 ). Bacterial Vaginosis: Prevalence in an Italian Population of Asymptomatic Pregnant Women and Diagnostic Aspects. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 12 (4), 383–905
Not in our library10.1007/bf00145302
- 37.
Daliri E. B. M. Lee B. H. (2015 ). New Perspectives on Probiotics in Health and Disease. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 4 (2), 56–65
Not in our library10.1016/j.fshw.2015.06.002
- 38.
Danielsson D. Teigen P. K. Moi H. (2011 ). The Genital Econiche: Focus on Microbiota and Bacterial Vaginosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1230(1), 48–58
Not in our library10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06041.x
- 39.
Deidda F. Amoruso A. Allesina S. Pane M. Graziano T. Del Piano M.. (2016 ). In Vitro Activity of Lactobacillus Fermentum LF5 Against Different Candida Species and Gardnerella Vaginalis: A New Perspective to Approach Mixed Vaginal Infections? J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 50, S168–S170
Not in our library10.1097/mcg.0000000000000692
- 40.
DeLong K. Bensouda S. Zulfiqar F. Zierden H. C. Hoang T. M. Abraham A. G.. (2019 ). Conceptual Design of a Universal Donor Screening Approach for Vaginal Microbiota Transplant. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 9, 306
Not in our library10.3389/fcimb.2019.00306
- 41.
Dessai F. Nyikjrenda M. Sebitloane M. Abbai N. (2020 ). Diagnostic Evaluation of the BD Affirm VPIII Assay as a Point-Of-Care Test for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis, Trichomoniasis and Candidiasis. Int. J. STD AIDS 31 (4), 303–115
Not in our library10.1177/0956462419895684
- 42.
Dickey L. J. Nailor M. D. Sobel J. D. (2009 ). Guidelines for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: Focus on Tinidazole. Ther. Clin. Risk Manage. 5, 485
Not in our library10.2147/tcrm.s3777
- 43.
Donders G. Bellen G. Donders F. Pinget J. Vandevelde I. Michiels T.. (2017 ). Improvement of Abnormal Vaginal Flora in Ugandan Women by Self-Testing and Short Use of Intravaginal Antimicrobials. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36, (4)
Not in our library10.1007/s10096-016-2856-9
- 44.
Donders G. G. G. Van Bulck B. Van de Walle P. Kaiser R. R. Pohlig G. Gonser S.. (2010 ). Effect of Lyophilized Lactobacilli and 0.03 Mg Estriol (Gynoflor®) on Vaginitis and Vaginosis With Disrupted Vaginal Microflora: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Active-Controlled Pilot Study. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 70 (4), 264–725
Not in our library10.1159/000314016
- 45.
Donders G. G. G. Zodzika J. Rezeberga D. (2014 ). Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: What We Have and What We Miss. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 15 (5), 645–575
Not in our library10.1517/14656566.2014.881800
- 46.
Fenollar F. Raoult D. (2016 ). Does Bacterial Vaginosis Result From Fecal Transplantation? J. Infect. Dis. 214 (11), 17845
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiw472
- 47.
Fettweis J. M. Brooks J. P. Serrano M. G. Sheth N. U. Girerd P. H. Edwards D. J.. (2014 ). Differences in Vaginal Microbiome in African American Women Versus Women of European Ancestry. Microbiology 160 Pt 10), 2272
Not in our library10.1099/mic.0.081034-0
- 48.
Forcey D. S. Vodstrcil L. A. Hocking J. S. Fairley C. K. Law M. McNair R. P.. (2015 ). Factors Associated With Bacterial Vaginosis Among Women Who Have Sex With Women: A Systematic Review. PLoS One 10 12), e01419055
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0141905
- 49.
Fredricks D. N. Fiedler T. L. Marrazzo J. M. (2005 ). Molecular Identification of Bacteria Associated With Bacterial Vaginosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 353 (18), 1899–19115
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa043802
- 50.
Fredricsson B. Englund K. Weintraub L. Ölund A. Nord C.-E. (1989 ). Bacterial Vaginosis Is Not a Simple Ecological Disorder. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 28 (3), 156–605
Not in our library10.1159/000293556
- 51.
Gajer P. Brotman R. M. Bai G. Sakamoto J. Schütte U. M. Zhong X.. (2012 ). Temporal Dynamics of the Human Vaginal Microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 132ra52
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3003605
- 52.
Gallo M. F. Warner L. King C. C. Sobel J. D. Klein R. S. Cu-Uvin S.. (2011 ). Association Between Semen Exposure and Incident Bacterial Vaginosis. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 842652
Not in our library10.1155/2011/842652
- 53.
Gardner H. L. Dukes C. D. (1955 ). Haemophilus Vaginalis Vaginitis: A Newly Defined Specific Infection Previously Classified ‘Nonspecific’ Vaginitis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 69 (5), 962–765
Not in our library10.1016/0002-9378(55)90095-8
- 54.
Gaydos C. A. Beqaj S. Schwebke J. R. Lebed J. Smith B. Davis T. E.. (2017 ). Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis. Obstet. Gynecol. 130 (1), 1815
Not in our library10.1097/aog.0000000000002090
- 55.
Georgijević A. Cjukić-Ivancević S. Bujko M. (2000 ). Bacterial Vaginosis. Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Srp. Arh. Celok. Lek. 128 (1–2), 29–33.
Not in our library
- 56.
Gilbert N. M. Lewis W. G. Li G. Sojka D. K. Bernard Lubin J. Lewis A. L. (2019 ). Gardnerella Vaginalis and Prevotella Bivia Trigger Distinct and Overlapping Phenotypes in a Mouse Model of Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 220 (7), 1099–11085
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiy704
- 57.
Gonzalez Pedraza Aviles P. Ortiz Zaragoza M. C. Irigoyen Coria A. (1999 ). Bacterial Vaginosis a Broad Overview. Rev. Latinoam. Microbiol. Mexico 41 (1), 25–345.
Not in our library
- 58.
Gottschick C. Deng Z.-L. Vital M. Masur C. Abels C. Pieper D. H.. (2017 ). Treatment of Biofilms in Bacterial Vaginosis by an Amphoteric Tenside Pessary-Clinical Study and Microbiota Analysis. Microbiome 5 (1), 1–155
Not in our library10.1186/s40168-017-0326-y
- 59.
Green K. A. Zarek S. M. Catherino W. H. (2015 ). Gynecologic Health and Disease in Relation to the Microbiome of the Female Reproductive Tract. Fertil. Steril. 104 (6), 1351–1575
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.010
- 60.
Guédou F. A. Van Damme L. Deese J. Crucitti T. Becker M. Mirembe F.. (2013 ). Behavioural and Medical Predictors of Bacterial Vaginosis Recurrence Among Female Sex Workers: Longitudinal Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Infect. Dis. 131, 1–115
Not in our library10.1186/1471-2334-13-208
- 61.
Hallén A. Jarstrand C. Påhlson C. (1992 ). Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis With Lactobacilli. Sex. Transm. Dis. 19 (3), 146–148
Not in our library10.1097/00007435-199205000-00007
- 62.
Hardy L. Jespers V. Abdellati S. De Baetselier I. Mwambarangwe L. Musengamana V.. (2016 ). A Fruitful Alliance: The Synergy Between Atopobium Vaginae and Gardnerella Vaginalis in Bacterial Vaginosis-Associated Biofilm. Sex. Transm. Infect. 92 (7), 487–915
Not in our library10.1136/sextrans-2015-052475
- 63.
Hay P. E. (2002 ). Bacterial Vaginosis as a Mixed Infection. In: Brogden K. Guthmiller J., editors. Polymicrobial Diseases. Washington (DC)
Not in our library10.1128/9781555817947.ch7
- 64.
Hemalatha R. Mastromarino P. Ramalaxmi B. A. Balakrishna N. V. Sesikeran B. (2012 ). Effectiveness of Vaginal Tablets Containing Lactobacilli Versus PH Tablets on Vaginal Health and Inflammatory Cytokines: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31 (11), 3097–3105
Not in our library10.1007/s10096-012-1671-1
- 65.
Hickey R. J. Forney L. J. (2014 ). Gardnerella Vaginalis Does Not Always Cause Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 210 (10), 1682–1835
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiu303
- 66.
Hickey R. J. Zhou X. Pierson J. D. Ravel J. Forney L. J. (2012 ). Understanding Vaginal Microbiome Complexity From an Ecological Perspective. Trans. Res. 160 (4), 267–825
Not in our library10.1016/j.trsl.2012.02.008
- 67.
Hilbert D. W. Smith W. L. Chadwick S. G. Toner G. Mordechai E. Adelson M. E.. (2016 ). Development and Validation of a Highly Accurate Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54 (4), 1017–1245
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.03104-15
- 68.
Hogan V. K. Culhane J. F. Hitti J. Rauh V. A. McCollum K. F. Agnew K. J. (2007 ). Relative Performance of Three Methods for Diagnosing Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy. Matern. Child Health J. 11 (6), 532–395
Not in our library10.1007/s10995-007-0205-4
- 69.
Hooven T. A. Randis T. M. Hymes S. R. Rampersaud R. Ratner A. J. (2012 ). Retrocyclin Inhibits Gardnerella Vaginalis Biofilm Formation and Toxin Activity. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67 (12), 2870–2725
Not in our library10.1093/jac/dks305
- 70.
Hou D. Zhou X. Zhong X. Settles M. L. Herring J. Wang L.. (2013 ). Microbiota of the Seminal Fluid From Healthy and Infertile Men. Fertil. Steril. 100 (5), 1261–1695
Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1991
- 71.
Huang B. Fettweis J. M. Brooks J. P. Jefferson K. K. Buck G. A. (2014 ). The Changing Landscape of the Vaginal Microbiome. Clin. Lab. Med. 34 (4), 747–615
Not in our library10.1016/j.cll.2014.08.006
- 72.
Hummelen R. Hemsworth J. Reid G. (2010 ). Clinical Study Comparing Probiotic Lactobacillus GR-1 and RC-14 With Metronidazole Vaginal Gel to Treat Symptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis. Nutrients 2 (6), 626
Not in our library10.3390/nu2060626
- 73.
Hymes S. R. Randis T. M. Sun T. Y. Ratner A. J. (2013 ). DNase Inhibits Gardnerella Vaginalis Biofilms In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Infect. Dis. 207 (10), 1491–1975
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jit047
- 74.
Ison C. A. Hay P. E. (2002 ). Validation of a Simplified Grading of Gram Stained Vaginal Smears for Use in Genitourinary Medicine Clinics. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78 (6), 413–415
Not in our library10.1136/sti.78.6.413
- 75.
Kairys N. Garg M. (2017 ). Bacterial Vaginosis. In: StatPearls. (Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing); 2021.
Not in our library
- 76.
Kenyon C. Colebunders R. Crucitti T. (2013 ). The Global Epidemiology of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 209 (6), 505–235
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.006
- 77.
Kenyon C. R. Osbak K. (2014 ). Recent Progress in Understanding the Epidemiology of Bacterial Vaginosis. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 26 (6), 448–545
Not in our library10.1097/gco.0000000000000112
- 78.
Kero K. Rautava J. Syrjänen K. Grenman S. Syrjänen S. (2017 ). Association of Asymptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis With Persistence of Female Genital Human Papillomavirus Infection. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36 (11), 2215–2219
Not in our library10.1007/s10096-017-3048-y
- 79.
Khan K. Shah R. Gautam M. Patil S. (2007 ). Clue Cells. Indian J. Sex. Transm. Dis. 28 (2), 1085
Not in our library10.4103/0253-7184.39018
- 80.
Khatoon R. Ahmad S. Jahan N. (2013 ). OSOM BV Blue Test: A New Point-Of-Care Test for Diagnosing Bacterial Vaginosis and Its Comparison With Gram Staining. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 7 (32), 4103–4106
Not in our library10.5897/ajmr2013.5957
- 81.
- 82.
Koumans E. H. Sternberg M. Bruce C. McQuillan G. Kendrick J. Sutton M.. (2007 ). The Prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis in the United States 2001–2004; Associations With Symptoms, Sexual Behaviors, and Reproductive Health. Sex. Transm. Dis. 34 (11), 864–695
Not in our library10.1097/olq.0b013e318074e565
- 83.
Kumar N. Behera B. Sagiri S. S. Pal K. Ray S. S. Roy S. (2011 ). Bacterial Vaginosis: Etiology and Modalities of Treatment—a Brief Note. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 3 (4), 496
Not in our library10.4103/0975-7406.90102
- 84.
Laghi L. Picone G. Cruciani F. Brigidi P. Calanni F. Donders G.. (2014 ). Rifaximin Modulates the Vaginal Microbiome and Metabolome in Women Affected by Bacterial Vaginosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58 (6), 3411–3205
Not in our library10.1128/aac.02469-14
- 85.
Lepargneur J.-P. Rousseau V. (2002 ). Rôle Protecteur De La Flore De Doderleïn. J. Gynécol. Obstét. Biol. Reprod. 31 (5), 485–494.
Not in our library
- 86.
Lewis F. M. T. Bernstein K. T. Aral S. O. (2017 ). Vaginal Microbiome and Its Relationship to Behavior, Sexual Health, and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Obstet. Gynecol. 129 (4), 6435
Not in our library10.1097/aog.0000000000001932
- 87.
Li J. McCormick J. Bocking A. Reid G. (2012 ). Importance of Vaginal Microbes in Reproductive Health. Reprod. Sci. 19 (3), 235–425
Not in our library10.1177/1933719111418379
- 88.
Ling Z. Liu X. Chen W. Luo Y. Yuan L. Xia Y.. (2013 ). The Restoration of the Vaginal Microbiota After Treatment for Bacterial Vaginosis With Metronidazole or Probiotics. Microb. Ecol. 65 (3), 773–805
Not in our library10.1007/s00248-012-0154-3
- 89.
Liu G.-j. Wang B. Zhang Y. Xing G.-w. Yang X. Wang S. (2018 ). A Tetravalent Sialic Acid-Coated Tetraphenylethene Luminogen With Aggregation-Induced Emission Characteristics: Design, Synthesis and Application for Sialidase Activity Assay, High-Throughput Screening of Sialidase Inhibitors and Diagnosis of Bacterial Va. Chem. Commun. 54 (76), 10691–10945
Not in our library10.1039/c8cc06300a
- 90.
- 91.
Machado A. Cerca N. (2015 ). Influence of Biofilm Formation by Gardnerella Vaginalis and Other Anaerobes on Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 212 (12), 1856–1615
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiv338
- 92.
Madhivanan P. Krupp K. Li T. Ravi K. Selezneva J. Srinivas V.. (2014 ). Performance of BVBlue Rapid Test in Detecting Bacterial Vaginosis Among Women in Mysore, India. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 908313
Not in our library10.1155/2014/908313
- 93.
Majigo M. V. Kashindye P. Mtulo Z. (2021 ). Bacterial Vaginosis, the Leading Cause of Genital Discharge Among Women Presenting With Vaginal Infection in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Afr. Health Sci. 21 (2), 531–375
Not in our library10.4314/ahs.v21i2.7
- 94.
Makarova K. Slesarev A. Wolf Y. Sorokin A. Mirkin B. Koonin E.. (2006 ). Comparative Genomics of the Lactic Acid Bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103 (42), 15611–15165
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0607117103
- 95.
Mårdh P. A. (1993 ). The Definition and Epidemiology of Bacterial Vaginosis. Rev. Fr. Gynecol. Obstet. 88 (3 Pt 2), 195–197.
Not in our library
- 96.
Margolis E. Fredricks D. N. (2015 ). “Bacterial Vaginosis-Associated Bacteria,” in Molecular Medical Microbiology (Bonston: Elsevier), 1487–1496.
Not in our library
- 97.
Marrazzo J. M. Fiedler T. L. Srinivasan S. Thomas K. K. Liu C. Ko D.. (2012 ). Extravaginal Reservoirs of Vaginal Bacteria as Risk Factors for Incident Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 205 (10), 1580–1885
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jis242
- 98.
Marrazzo J. M. Hillier S. L. (2013 ). Bacterial Vaginosis. Sex. Transm. Dis., 463–498
Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-391059-2.00018-8
- 99.
Marrazzo J. M. Thomas K. K. Fiedler T. L. Ringwood K. Fredricks D. N. (2008 ). Relationship of Specific Vaginal Bacteria and Bacterial Vaginosis Treatment Failure in Women Who Have Sex With Women. Ann. Intern. Med. 149 (1), 20–285
Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00006
- 100.
Mastromarino P. Macchia S. Meggiorini L. Trinchieri V. Mosca L. Perluigi M.. (2009 ). Effectiveness of Lactobacillus-Containing Vaginal Tablets in the Treatment of Symptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15 (1), 67–74
Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02112.x
- 101.
McClelland R. S. Lingappa J. R. Srinivasan S. Kinuthia J. John-Stewart G. C. Jaoko W.. (2018 ). Evaluation of the Association Between the Concentrations of Key Vaginal Bacteria and the Increased Risk of HIV Acquisition in African Women From Five Cohorts: A Nested Case-Control Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18 (5), 554–645
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30058-6
- 102.
Menard J. P. Fenollar F. Henry M. Bretelle F. Raoult D. (2008 ). Molecular Quantification of Gardnerella Vaginalis and Atopobium Vaginae Loads to Predict Bacterial Vaginosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47 (1), 33–435
Not in our library10.1086/588661
- 103.
Menard J.-P. Fenollar F. Raoult D. Boubli L. Bretelle F. (2012 ). Self-Collected Vaginal Swabs for the Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay of Atopobium Vaginae and Gardnerella Vaginalis and the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31 (4), 513–185
Not in our library10.1007/s10096-011-1341-8
- 104.
Mendling W. (2016 ). Vaginal Microbiota. In: Schwiertz A. (eds). Microbiota of the Human Body. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Cham: Springer, vol. 902, p. 83–93
Not in our library10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_6
- 105.
Money D. (2005 ). The Laboratory Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 16 (2), 77–79
Not in our library10.1155/2005/230319
- 106.
Morris M. C. Rogers P. A. Kinghorn G. R. (2001 ). Is Bacterial Vaginosis a Sexually Transmitted Infection? Sex. Transm. Infect. 77 (1), 63–68
Not in our library10.1136/sti.77.1.63
- 107.
Muhleisen A. \. L. Herbst-Kralovetz M. M. (2016 ). Menopause and the Vaginal Microbiome. Maturitas 91, 42–50
Not in our library10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.05.015
- 108.
Muzny C. A. Blanchard E. Taylor C. M. Aaron K. J. Talluri R. Griswold M. E.. (2018 ). Identification of Key Bacteria Involved in the Induction of Incident Bacterial Vaginosis: A Prospective Study. J. Infect. Dis. 218 (6), 966–785
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiy243
- 109.
Muzny C. A. Sunesara I. R. Austin E. L. Mena L. A. Schwebke J. R. (2013 ). Bacterial Vaginosis Among African American Women Who Have Sex With Women. Sex. Transm. Dis. 40 (9), 751–555
Not in our library10.1097/olq.0000000000000004
- 110.
Muzny C. A. Taylor C. M. Swords W. E. Tamhane A. Chattopadhyay D. Cerca N.. (2019 ). An Updated Conceptual Model on the Pathogenesis of Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 220 (9), 1399–14055
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiz342
- 111.
Myziuk L. Romanowski B. Johnson S. C. (2003 ). BVBlue Test for Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41 (5), 1925–1285
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.41.5.1925-1928.2003
- 112.
Nardis C. Mosca L. Mastromarino P. (2013 ). Vaginal Microbiota and Viral Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Ann. Ig. 25 (5), 443–456
Not in our library10.7416/ai.2013.1946
- 113.
Nasioudis D. Linhares I. M. Ledger W. J. Witkin S. S. (2017 ). Bacterial Vaginosis: A Critical Analysis of Current Knowledge. BJOG 124 (1), 61–695
Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.14209
- 114.
Nelson T. M. Borgogna J. C. Michalek R. D. Roberts D. W. Rath J. M. Glover E. D.. (2018 ). Cigarette Smoking Is Associated With an Altered Vaginal Tract Metabolomic Profile. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 1–135
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-14943-3
- 115.
Nelson D. B. Hanlon A. L. Wu G. Liu C. Fredricks D. N. (2015 a). First Trimester Levels of BV-Associated Bacteria and Risk of Miscarriage Among Women Early in Pregnancy. Matern. Child Health J. 19 (12), 2682–2875
Not in our library10.1007/s10995-015-1790-2
- 116.
Nugent R. P. Krohn M. A. Hillier S. L. (1991 ). Reliability of Diagnosing Bacterial Vaginosis Is Improved by a Standardized Method of Gram Stain Interpretation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29 (2), 297–3015
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991
- 117.
- 118.
- 119.
Onderdonk A. B. Delaney M. L. Fichorova R. N. (2016 ). The Human Microbiome During Bacterial Vaginosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 29 (2), 223–385
Not in our library10.1128/cmr.00075-15
- 120.
Parent D. Bossens M. Bayot D. Kirkpatrick C. Graf F. Wilkinson F. E.. (1996 ). Therapy of Bacterial Vaginosis Using Exogenously-Applied Lactobacilli Acidophili and a Low Dose of Estriol: A Placebo-Controlled Multicentric Clinical Trial. Arzneimittelforschung 46 (1), 68–735.
Not in our library
- 121.
- 122.
Qian Z. Zhu H. Zhao D. Yang P. Gao F. Lu C.. (2021 ). Probiotic Lactobacillus Sp. Strains Inhibit Growth, Adhesion, Biofilm Formation, and Gene Expression of Bacterial Vaginosis-Inducing Gardnerella Vaginalis. Microorganisms 9 (4), 728
Not in our library10.3390/microorganisms9040728
- 123.
Ravel J. Gajer P. Abdo Z. Schneider G. M. Koenig S. S. (2011 ). Vaginal Microbiome of Reproductive-Age Women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 4680–4687
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1002611107
- 124.
Redelinghuys M. J. Ehlers M. M. Bezuidenhoudt J. E. Becker P. J. Kock M. M. (2017 ). Assessment of Atopobium Vaginae and Gardnerella Vaginalis Concentrations in a Cohort of Pregnant South African Women. Sex. Transm. Infect. 93 (6), 410–55
Not in our library10.1136/sextrans-2016-052883
- 125.
Reid (2018 ). Is Bacterial Vaginosis a Disease? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102 (2), 553–558
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-017-8659-9
- 126.
Rodríguez-Nava C. Cortés-Sarabia K. Avila-Huerta M. D. Ortiz-Riaño E. J. Estrada-Moreno A. K. del C Alarcón-Romero L.. (2021 ). Nanophotonic Sialidase Immunoassay for Bacterial Vaginosis Diagnosis. ACS Pharmacol. Trans. Sci. 4 (1), 365–715
Not in our library10.1021/acsptsci.0c00211
- 127.
- 128.
Rousseau V. Lepargneur J. P. Roques C. Remaud-Simeon M. Paul F. (2005 ). Prebiotic Effects of Oligosaccharides on Selected Vaginal Lactobacilli and Pathogenic Microorganisms. Anaerobe 11 (3), 145–153
Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2004.12.002
- 129.
Rumyantseva T. Khayrullina G. Guschin A. Donders G. (2019 ). Prevalence of Ureaplasma Spp. And Mycoplasma Hominis in Healthy Women and Patients With Flora Alterations. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 93 (3), 227–315
Not in our library10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.10.001
- 130.
Schellenberg J. J. Jayaprakash T. P. Gamage N. W. Patterson M. H. Vaneechoutte M. Hill J. E. (2016 ). Gardnerella Vaginalis Subgroups Defined by Cpn 60 Sequencing and Sialidase Activity in Isolates From Canada, Belgium and Kenya. PLoS One 11 (1), e01465105
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0146510
- 131.
Schwebke J. R. Desmond R. A. (2007 ). A Randomized Trial of the Duration of Therapy With Metronidazole Plus or Minus Azithromycin for Treatment of Symptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44 (2), 213–219
Not in our library10.1086/509577
- 132.
Schwebke J. R. Lensing S. Y. Lee J. Muzny C. A. Pontius A. Woznicki N.. (2021 ). Treatment of Male Sexual Partners of Women With Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 73 (3), e672–e795
Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciaa1903
- 133.
Sgibnev A. V. Kremleva E. A. (2015 ). Vaginal Protection by H2O2-Producing Lactobacilli. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 8 (10), e22913–e22913
Not in our library10.5812/jjm.22913
- 134.
Sharma H. Tal R. Clark N. A. Segars J. H. (2014 ). Microbiota and Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. in Seminars in Reproductive Medicine (New York: Thieme Medical Publishers), 43–49
Not in our library10.1055/s-0033-1361822
- 135.
Sherrard J. Wilson J. Donders G. Mendling W. Jensen J. S. (2018 ). 2018 European (IUSTI/WHO) International Union Against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI) World Health Organisation (WHO) Guideline on the Management of Vaginal Discharge. Int. J. STD AIDS 29 (13), 1258–1725
Not in our library10.1177/0956462418785451
- 136.
Shipitsyna E. Khusnutdinova T. Budilovskaya O. Krysanova A. Shalepo K. Savicheva A.. (2020 ). Bacterial Vaginosis-Associated Vaginal Microbiota Is an Age-Independent Risk Factor for Chlamydia Trachomatis, Mycoplasma Genitalium and Trichomonas Vaginalis Infections in Low-Risk Women, St. Petersburg, Russia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 39 (7), 1221–1305
Not in our library10.1007/s10096-020-03831-w
- 137.
Shujatullah F. Khan H. M. Khatoon R. Rabbani T. Malik A. (2010 ). An Evaluation of OSOM BV Blue Test in the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 3 (7), 574–765
Not in our library10.1016/s1995-7645(10)60139-3
- 138.
Sobel J. D. (2017 ). “Vaginitis, Vulvitis, Cervicitis and Cutaneous Vulval Lesions,” in Infectious Diseases (St. Louis: Elsevier), 483–491.
Not in our library
- 139.
Stoyancheva G. Marzotto M. Dellaglio F. Torriani S. (2014 ). Bacteriocin Production and Gene Sequencing Analysis From Vaginal Lactobacillus Strains. Arch. Microbiol. 196 (9), 645–535
Not in our library10.1007/s00203-014-1003-1
- 140.
Svare J. A. Schmidt H. Hansen B. B. Lose G. (2006 ). Bacterial Vaginosis in a Cohort of Danish Pregnant Women: Prevalence and Relationship With Preterm Delivery, Low Birthweight and Perinatal Infections. BJOG 113 (12), 1419–1255
Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01087.x
- 141.
Swidsinski A. Doerffel Y. Loening-Baucke V. Swidsinski S. Verstraelen H. Vaneechoutte M.. (2010 a). Gardnerella Biofilm Involves Females and Males and Is Transmitted Sexually. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 70 (4), 256–635
Not in our library10.1159/000314015
- 142.
Swidsinski A. Dörffel Y. Loening-Baucke V. Mendling W. Verstraelen H. Dieterle S.. (2010 b). Desquamated Epithelial Cells Covered With a Polymicrobial Biofilm Typical for Bacterial Vaginosis Are Present in Randomly Selected Cryopreserved Donor Semen. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 59 (3), 399–4045
Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-695x.2010.00688.x
- 143.
Tachedjian G. Aldunate M. Bradshaw C. S. Cone R. A. (2017 ). The Role of Lactic Acid Production by Probiotic Lactobacillus Species in Vaginal Health. Res. Microbiol. 168 (9–10), 782–792
Not in our library10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.001
- 144.
Thulkar J. Kriplani A. Agarwal N. (2012 ). A Comparative Study of Oral Single Dose of Metronidazole, Tinidazole, Secnidazole and Ornidazole in Bacterial Vaginosis. Indian J. Pharmacol. 44 (2), 2435
Not in our library10.4103/0253-7613.93859
- 145.
Tidbury F. D. Langhart A. Weidlinger S. Stute P. (2020 ). Non-Antibiotic Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis—a Systematic Review. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 303, 1–9
Not in our library10.1007/s00404-020-05821-x
- 146.
Trabert B. Misra D. P. (2007 ). Risk Factors for Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy Among African American Women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 197 (5), 477–e15
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.085
- 147.
Vaneechoutte M. Guschin A. Van Simaey L. Gansemans Y. Van Nieuwerburgh F. Cools P. (2019 ). Emended Description of Gardnerella Vaginalis and Description of Gardnerella Leopoldii Sp. Nov., Gardnerella Piotii Sp. Nov. And Gardnerella Swidsinskii Sp. Nov., With Delineation of 13 Genomic Species Within the Genus Gardnerella. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 69 (3), 679–687
Not in our library10.1099/ijsem.0.003200
- 148.
van Oostrum N. De Sutter P. Meys J. Verstraelen H. (2013 ). Risks Associated With Bacterial Vaginosis in Infertility Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hum. Reprod. 28 (7), 1809–1155
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/det096
- 149.
Verstraelen H. Verhelst R. Vaneechoutte M. Temmerman M. (2010 ). The Epidemiology of Bacterial Vaginosis in Relation to Sexual Behaviour. BMC Infect. Dis. 10 (1), 1–115
Not in our library10.1186/1471-2334-10-81
- 150.
Vicariotto F. Mogna L. Del Piano M. (2014 ). Effectiveness of the Two Microorganisms Lactobacillus Fermentum LF15 and Lactobacillus Plantarum LP01, Formulated in Slow-Release Vaginal Tablets, in Women Affected by Bacterial Vaginosis: A Pilot Study. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 48, S106–S112
Not in our library10.1097/mcg.0000000000000226
- 151.
Vujic G. Knez A. J. Despot Stefanovic V. Kuzmic Vrbanovic V. (2013 ). Efficacy of Orally Applied Probiotic Capsules for Bacterial Vaginosis and Other Vaginal Infections: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 168 (1), 75–795
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.031
- 152.
Wang Z. Zhang L. Zhao M. Wang Y. Bai H. Wang Y.. (2020 ). Deep Neural Networks Offer Morphologic Classification and Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 59 (2), e02236–20
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.02236-20
- 153.
Weissenbacher E. R. Donders G. Unzeitig V. Martinez De Tejada B. Gerber S. Halaška M.. (2012 ). A Comparison of Dequalinium Chloride Vaginal Tablets (Fluomizin®) and Clindamycin Vaginal Cream in the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Single-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 73 (1), 8–155
Not in our library10.1159/000332398
- 154.
Wessels J. M. Lajoie J. Vitali D. Omollo K. Kimani J. Oyugi J.. (2017 ). Association of High-Risk Sexual Behaviour With Diversity of the Vaginal Microbiota and Abundance of Lactobacillus. PLoS One 12 (11), e01876125
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0187612
- 155.
Wewalka G. Stary A. Bosse B. Duerr H. E. Reimer K. (2002 ). Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Vaginal Suppositories in the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis. Dermatology 204 (Suppl. 1), 79–85
Not in our library10.1159/000057731
- 156.
Wiesenfeld H. C. Hillier S. L. Krohn M. A. Landers D. V. Sweet R. L. (2003 ). Bacterial Vaginosis Is a Strong Predictor of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36 (5), 663–685
Not in our library10.1086/367658
- 157.
Wilson B. A. Thomas S. M. Ho M. (2011 ). “The Human Vaginal Microbiome,” in Metagenomics of the Human Body (New York: Springer), 91–115.
Not in our library
- 158.
Witkin S. S. (2015 ). The Vaginal Microbiome, Vaginal Anti-Microbial Defence Mechanisms and the Clinical Challenge of Reducing Infection-Related Preterm Birth. BJOG 122 (2), 213–218
Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.13115
- 159.
World Health Organization (2021 ). Guidelines for the Management of Symptomatic Sexually Transmitted Infections. (Geneva, Switerzerland: World Health Organization).
Not in our library
- 160.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.