Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

The Impact of Gut Microbiota on Radiation-Induced Enteritis

Yongping Jian, Dan Zhang, Mingdi Liu and 2 more

Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.586392

Abstract

Radiotherapy is an important treatment for abdominal tumors. A critical side effect for this therapy is enteritis. In this review, we aim to summarize recent findings in radiation enteritis, in particular the role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in the development and therapy of the disease. Gut microbiota dysbiosis plays an important role in the occurrence of various diseases, such as radiation enteritis. Abdominal radiation results in changes in the composition of microbiota and reduces its diversity, which is mainly reflected in the decrease of Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. and increase of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus spp. Gut microbiota dysbiosis aggravates radiation enteritis, weakens intestinal epithelial barrier function, and promotes inflammatory factor expression. Pathogenic Escherichia coli induce the rearrangement and redistribution of claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1 in tight junctions, a critical component in intestinal epithelial barrier. In view of the role that microbiome plays in radiation enteritis, we believe that intestinal flora could be a potential biomarker for the disease. Correction of microbiome by application of probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and antibiotics could be an effective method for the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced enteritis.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Highlights

In this article, we reviewed the alteration of intestinal flora and its functional impact on radiation enteritis. Specifically, we summarized changes in the composition and diversity of microbiota in radiation-induced enteritis. We further reviewed the mechanisms by which gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes the development of radiation enteritis. In addition, we summarized recent findings in the treatment of radiation enteritis by correction of microbiome with probiotics and FMT. Our goal is to consolidate the current literature to better delineate the relationship between microbiota and radiation enteritis.

Introduction

Emil Grubbe’s treatment of breast cancer with radiotherapy back in 1896, pioneered modern cancer radiation therapy. As the number of patients receiving radiation increases steadily, the incidence of radiotherapy-associated complications has risen in parallel. While radiotherapy improves the survival of cancer patients, the oxidative stress caused by radiotherapy can produce reactive oxide species (ROS), which result in broad DNA damage to normal tissues, e.g., the gastrointestinal mucosa. It was reported that 6% to 78% of the long-term post-radiation survivors suffer from complications, leading to a compromise in patient’s quality of life. The most common side effect of this therapy is intestinal mucositis caused by injuries of normal intestinal epithelial cells. Intestinal mucosal atrophy and ulcer caused by radiotherapy hinder the renewal of basal epithelial cells (radiation-induced enteritis). The incidence of radiation-induced enteritis is largely dependent on radiation treatment scheme. Patients with acute radiotherapy enteritis manifest symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, constipation, hematochezia and loss of weight. Severe radiation-induced enteritis can lead to life-threatening systemic infection over a course of 3 months. Therefore, prevention of adverse side effects associated with radiotherapy has become an urgent priority. It was reported that 90% of patients receiving abdominal radiotherapy develop gastrointestinal symptoms in a few weeks after the treatment. The intestinal microecology is disordered, and the infection of Clostridium difficile increases accordingly. In view of the key role of intestinal microecology in diseases, understanding the relationship between radiation enteritis and intestinal microecology and modulating the intestinal microecology to alleviate radiation enteritis may demonstrate a therapeutic benefit.

Microbiome Functions in Human Body

Intestinal mucosal barriers include those induced by mechanical, chemical, immunological and biological factors. The biological factors refer to microbiome parasitizing in gastrointestinal tract of healthy people. The size of population for microbiome in an average adult intestine is around 100 trillion. In healthy individuals, the intestinal flora maintains a stable and mutualism relationship with human host, and involves in almost all physiological aspects in nutrition, immune, and digestion. Gut microbiota is beneficial to host homeostasis and immune system development, regulating innate and adaptive immune response. The physical condition of host depends on the interaction between the microbiome and the immune system. In addition, gut microbiota also regulates host metabolism. Dysbiosis is related to the occurrence of multiple metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and obesity, indicating that a stable gut microbiome is essential to human health.

Gut microbiome dysbiosis is also closely related to the occurrence and metastasis of dietary-associated cancers. Intestinal flora may be used as biomarkers for the diagnosis of cancer. For example, the development of gastric cancer is associated with dysbacteriosis. The microbial dysbiosis index improves the sensitivity and specificity in detecting gastric cancer, indicating that changes in the overall flora rather than changes in individual flora lead to gastric cancer. In addition, Fusobacterium and related bacteria may also promote the growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer. Microbiota co-exists in primary and matched metastatic tumors, and is continuously associated with distant metastasis of primary human colorectal cancer. Microbiome is also strongly linked to cancer treatment. Reports showed that the composition of gut microbiota can impact anti-cancer treatment by improving antitumor immunity. Targeting gut microbiota strengthens the efficacy of drugs and reduces adverse reactions (Figure 1).

Radiotherapy remains to be essential for most of cancers. The imbalance in the diversity of microbiome is associated with the occurrence and treatment failure of a variety of diseases, including radiation enteritis. It is necessary to clarify the interaction between intestinal flora and radiation-induced enteritis to provide optimal treatment for patients.

Pathogenesis of Radiation-Induced Enteritis: Emerging Roles of Gut Microbiota

The symptoms of radiation-associated enteritis, such as diarrhea, are correlated with the onset time and duration of radiotherapy. It has been reported that radiotherapy-induced enteritis is a common reason for reduced dosage of irradiation in radiotherapy. Such reduction can severely compromise body functions and increase mortality among cancer patients. High doses of radiotherapy lead to intestinal villi atrophy, intestinal epithelial damage, increased apoptosis, and spike in inflammation. Moreover, radiotherapy can also result in the dysfunction of intestinal epithelial barrier, leading to increased intestinal permeability, diarrhea, and disruption of water and electrolyte processing. This may ultimately result in hypovolemic shock, hence endangering life. Radiation enteritis includes five phases, (i) the initial phase with the formation of ROS that result in DNA damage, (ii) the primary damage response phase with inflammation and apoptosis, (iii) the signal amplification phase, in which more inflammation and apoptosis occurs, (iv) the phase of ulcer formation, with discontinuity of the epithelial barrier that promotes bacterial translocation, and (v) the healing phase, with cell proliferation once radiotherapy has ceased. Although recent studies have begun to reveal the pathogenesis of radiation enteritis, our current knowledge is far from being able to provide an effective prevention or treatment for the disease.

There is evidence that the pathophysiology of intestinal injury caused by radiation is related to the dysbiosis of gut microbiota. To demonstrate the influence of gut microbiota on intestinal inflammation, García-Lafuente et al. evaluated the effect of colonic microbiota on 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced intestinal inflammation in rats. Animals whose colon segments were excluded from fecal transport were recolonized with pre-selected bacteria to test the effects of different species on intestinal inflammation and damage. Rats with excluded colon and sterile culture of intracavitary washings showed slight inflammation and low mucosal damage in response to TNBS. Rats colonized with anaerobic bacteria showed significantly higher release of eicosanoids than rats colonized with aerobic bacteria only. In addition, mucosal lesions were mainly observed in rats with anaerobic bacteria, which suggest that colonic anaerobic bacteria may play a role in intestinal inflammation. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the relationship between radiation intestinal injury and intestinal flora. We will give an overview of the characteristics of alteration of intestinal microbiota in radiation enteritis and its possible mechanisms in radiotherapy-induced intestinal injury.

Although limitations exist in studies with animals, the majority of the intestinal flora in mice is unique, with high similarities to those in humans (e.g., phylum level of both mice and humans are mainly dominated by Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Animal models, if used within ethical bounds, are crucial in identifying the relationship between radiotherapy enteritis and gut microbiota. We will not only summarize the changes of microbiome in clinical patients with radiation enteritis, but will also discuss the relationship between radiation enteritis and intestinal flora in animal models.

Radiation Leads to Alterations in the Composition and Diversity of Gut Microbiota

The development and application of 16S rRNA sequencing greatly promote the study of gut microbiota. 16S rRNA sequencing is a cost-effective method to study the microbiota diversity and composition in a large number of samples. However, this method is limited to the detection in flora composition. In order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the microbiota, combined applications of 16S rRNA sequencing with metabolomics, transcriptomics, shotgun metagenomics, and other methods are recommended.

Cui et al. determined the relationship between microbiome and the radiation sensitivity in the radiation enteritis through the 16S rRNA sequencing, and found that 6.5 Gy gamma ray with whole body radiation changed community composition of intestinal microbiota in C57BL/6 mice. The authors further confirmed that alterations in intestinal flora affect post-irradiation survival of mice mainly due to microbiome changes, which deregulate lncRNA expression of the host, hence sensitizing the mice to radiation. In addition, Johnson et al. found that approximately two hours after radiation, aerobic bacteria and Lactobacillus counts in the intestine become markedly reduced. Zhao et al. obtained a similar result, proving that abdominal radiation disrupted the intestinal flora balance and significantly reduced gut microbiota diversity in mice. Together, current studies demonstrate that in animal models, abdominal radiation induces gut microbiota dysbiosis and reduces the survival of radioactive mice.

Clinically, the incidence of grade 2 or even worse diarrhea was as high as 17% in patients undergoing radiotherapy before surgery. Excessive growth of gram-negative bacilli is detected in radiation-enteritis-induced diarrhea. Comparison of microbiota immediately before, immediately after, and two weeks after radiotherapy indicated that patients with diarrhea showed an increase in Actinobacteria phylum and a reduction in Clostridium. Impairment of intestinal motility after radiation is the main pathogenic factor for colonization of gram-negative bacilli in gastrointestinal tract. During bacterial overgrowth, absence of intestinal migrating motor complex (MMC) correlates with the existence of mass colonization of gram-negative bacilli. Thus, abnormal intestinal motility and mass colonization of gram-negative bacilli are important factors for the development of severe late-stage radiation-induced enteropathy. In addition, the susceptibility and protection to diarrhea and other bacterial changes after radiotherapy may also be related to different initial microbiota colonization.

Manichanh et al. analyzed the intestinal bacteria of patients receiving radiotherapy. In radiation enteritis patients without diarrhea, Actinobacteria phylum was not detected, whereas in patients with diarrhea, Bacilli class showed a higher abundance. Radiation therapy reestablishes the intestinal flora, and acute diarrhea induced by radiation enteritis is associated with the reconstitution of colonized intestinal flora. Differences in the level of gut microbiota diversity reveal an obvious variance in microbiota composition and structure between cancer patients and healthy individuals. Stool samples were collected from 18 patients with cervical cancer during radiotherapy. Wang et al. used the Illumina HiSeq platform to characterize the microbiota based on 16S rRNA sequencing. Microbiota dysbiosis was observed in radiation enteritis patients with a significant decrease in α diversity and an increase in β diversity. The abundance of Proteobacteria, Gamma proteobacteria and Coprococcus was increased, while the level of Bacteroides was reduced.

Manichanh et al. demonstrated that there are different intestinal floras in abdominal cancer patients and in healthy individuals, because shifts in intestinal health status (such as chronic inflammation or abnormal function of epithelial cells) may directly affect microbiome. There is no direct causal relationship between gynecological cancer and intestinal flora, but Nam et al. found that there were significant differences in gut microbiota between gynecological cancer patients and healthy individuals. As compared with healthy individuals, gynecologic cancer patients receiving radiation therapy mainly possess a relative abundance of the phylum. Actinobacteria were 30 times higher than those in healthy individuals whereas Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria were lower than those in healthy people. At the family level, the relative abundance of Eubacteriaceae was obviously higher, and Prevotellaceae, Oscillospiraceae and Fusobacteriaceae were lower than those in healthy group. Therefore, even if the location of disease development is far from or not related to the intestinal tract, the alteration in health status of the host will also affect the overall homeostasis of intestinal flora. Gut microbiota in different types of cancer patients may also be different as compared with healthy individuals.

Together, current studies suggest that gut microbiota in radiation-associated enteritis patients show marked changes in terms of composition and diversity. In radiation enteritis, the abundance of most bacteria belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria increases, and most of these bacteria are conditional pathogens, such as Escherichia coli. In contrast, microorganisms from Firmicutes and Bacteroides are reduced. Most of these bacteria are probiotics, such as Lactobacillus. When the abundance of probiotics decreases, conditional pathogens will reproduce and occupy the niche, which, in return, further inhibit the growth of probiotics and promote the release of endotoxin, and hence enhance intestinal inflammation. A vicious cycle may thus exacerbate radiation enteritis (Table 1).

Mechanisms by Which Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota Contributes to Radiation-Induced Enteritis

Radiation-induced enteritis refers to the intestinal mucosa damaged by the free radicals derived from ionization. Radiation enteritis is manifested by phenotypes such as impaired intestinal mucosal barrier, increased inflammatory factors, enhanced pathogen invasion and endotoxin release, and decreased immune barrier.

The Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Weakens the Function of Intestinal Epithelial Barrier

The intestinal epithelial barrier is composed of mucus layer, epithelial glycoglobulin and epithelial cells, and plays a critical role in the prevention of pathogen invasion. As an important component of the intestinal epithelial barrier, intercellular junctions, which include tight junction, gap junction, adhesion junction and desmosome, form multiple functional complexes. Tight junction, as the most important intercellular junction, determines the intestinal epithelial permeability and maintains physiological functions of the intestinal barrier. Zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), occludin, and claudins are three most important tight junction proteins, which play a vital role in maintaining cell polarity and intestinal epithelial barrier. It was found that tight junction proteins are essential in repairing intestinal epithelial damages. Accumulating evidence shows that intestinal microbiome involves in the intestinal epithelial cell signaling and affects the intestinal barrier function. Gut microbiota regulates intestinal barrier function by maintaining tight junction protein expression and distributions, which are important in intestinal barrier integrity.

The intestinal epithelial mucus is a protective layer, which is regulated by bacteria such as Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, and Streptococci that play a positive role in strengthening the intestinal mucosal barrier. In the rat model, microbiota markedly promotes the expression of MUC2 gene and secretion of colonic MUC2. Akkermansia muciniphila is a type of gram-negative intestinal symbiotic bacteria that also promotes intestinal barrier function by enhancing mucous generation. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) produced by Akkermansia muciniphila enter the intestinal epithelial cells through G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) 41/43 to increase the expression of tight junction protein claudin-3 and occludin. Administration of Lactobacillus to healthy subjects significantly increases the scaffold protein ZO-1 and occludin in the vicinity of the tight junction structure, forming a cell side seal between the epithelial cells.

In radiation-associated enteritis patients, probiotics can also maintain micro-ecological stability and protect the intestinal barrier function by interrupting the pathogen’s infection or inhibiting the growth of pathogens. After intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli infection, changes in host cell cytoskeleton reduce the absorbing surface of intestinal epithelial cells, leading to pathogenic Escherichia coli infection-associated persistent diarrhea. However, Lactobacillus plantarum prevents pathogenic Escherichia coli-induced rearrangement and redistribution of claudin-1, occludin, ZO-1 and JAM-1. Lactobacillus competes with pathogens to bind to receptors on the surface of intestinal epithelial cells, inhibits pathogen growth, and reduces the vitality and toxicity of pathogenic Escherichia coli. In addition, certain harmful bacteria in Enterobacteriaceae can form a biofilm on the surface of the epithelium, altering and destroying the mucus layer. The increase of Citrobacter rodentium digests mucins with glycosidase, and participates in the degradation of mucus barrier. Thus, the colonization of probiotics decreases, and the pathogenic bacteria multiply without competitors. The imbalance of intestinal flora homeostasis will weaken the intestinal epithelial barrier integrity, resulting in increased intestinal permeability.

Microbiome Dysbiosis Contributes to the Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines

Grander et al. found that recombination with Akkermansia muciniphila reduces expression of IL-1β and TNF-α and decrease the infiltration of MPO+ neutrophils in mice. Gut probiotics inhibit inflammation via suppressing the activation of NF-κB and TNF-α. This signaling pathway plays an important role in intestinal microbiota balance, which helps to regulate intestinal homeostasis, maintains intestinal barrier function and promotes repair and regeneration of tissues damaged. Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, Dorea, Lachnospira, Roseburia, Bifidobacterium and Clostridium can alleviate inflammation by inhibiting the TLR-NF-κB pathway. Bifidobacterium inhibits intestinal epithelial cell inflammation by attenuating the inflammatory response induced by TNF-α and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In addition, increased Citrobacter can activate NF-κB, and also involve in the degradation of the mucus barrier, thus increasing the inflammatory response. NF-κB and TNF-α are able to increase the production of myosin light-chain kinase, resulting in the disassembly of tight junction proteins. Biffidobactrium diminishes the formation of intestinal endotoxins and increases the production of tight junction proteins, thus decreasing intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation. Microbiome dysbiosis induced by radiation enteritis leads to severe side effects in immunodeficiency cancer patients because intestinal flora plays a vital role in innate and adaptive immune responses of hosts. Interestingly, less apoptosis was observed in endothelial cells and lymphocytes in small intestine of germ free (GF) mice received a lethal dose of irradiation, demonstrating that GF mice may be resistance to lethal radioactive enteritis. Together, these studies suggest that microbiota dysbiosis may be detrimental to the maintenance of effective intestinal barrier function after radiation.

The mechanisms by which changes in the gut microbiota affect intestinal injury in radiation are expected to be extremely complicated. The dynamic changes of the microbial community interact with various components within the intestine rather than a single compound in the system. Current evidence supports and illustrates that intestinal microbiome plays a critical role in radiation-associated enteritis via up-regulating key regulatory factors. Gut microbiota and the body form a symbiotic and stable relationship in the protection of the intestinal epithelium, reduction of inflammatory responses, and maintenance of normal immune tolerance in order to sustain host’s immune homeostasis, growth, and development. If there is an imbalance in intestinal flora, the relative abundance and diversity of the probiotics will be severely compromised, leading to limited intestinal barrier function, harmful bacteria overgrowth, accumulation of endotoxin in the blood, increased inflammatory factors, and eventually aggravating radiotherapy-induced enteritis. Thus, a stabilized intestinal microbiota is crucial for radiation enteritis (Figure 2).

Probiotics Regulate the Intestinal Microbiota to Improve Radiation Enteritis

Recent studies have shown that probiotics are beneficial in strengthening the number and activity of host T cells, directly affecting the immune response mediated by T cells and improving immune functions. Furthermore, probiotics promote the diversity of gut microbiota, and increase the species of intestinal flora, ensuring the integrity of intestinal mucosal barrier so as to avoid bacterial translocation. The probiotic VSL# 3 is a mixture of 8 probiotics, which has been used broadly for many years with high safety. Clinically, it was proved that VSL#3 alleviates intestinal inflammation and enhances intestinal barrier functions by improving intestinal flora balance. Treatment with VSL# 3 probiotics increases the diversity of bacterial community in patients, reduces fungal variety, and elevates the abundance of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, and hence reduces the incidence and severity of radiotherapy enteritis-associated diarrhea.

A randomized double-blind controlled trial showed that a standard dose of Lactobacillus acidophilus LAC-361 and Bifidobacterium longum BB-536 decreased level 2, 3, and 4 diarrhea caused by radiation enteritis in patients with surgery. Demers et al. analyzed a total of 229 patients and found that for patients who had undergone surgery, the incidence of diarrhea was reduced after probiotic treatment. For patients who did not undergo surgery, there was no statistical difference. In fact, for patients without surgery, patients treated with standard doses of probiotics had fewer moderate to severe diarrhea than the placebo group at the end of radiotherapy. For patients with surgery before radiotherapy, administration of probiotics tends to reduce all degrees of diarrhea, especially the most severe grade 4 diarrhea. These results may be attributable to the individualized nutritional interventions during the treatment, and these interventions were adjusted as the treatment progressed. It is difficult to compare these results with other published studies due to different treatment options. In addition, compared to probiotic treatment group, the placebo group showed a significant destruction of gut microbiota after radiotherapy enteritis (e.g., through an increase in Enterobacteriaceae. The intragastric administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus increased the crypts survival in radiation-induced enteritis by approximately two-fold and reduced epithelial cell apoptosis at the crypt basement, which depends on intact Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and MyD88-dependent signals that involve in the relocation and expression of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) in mesenchymal stem cells of crypt region. Bifidobacterium infantis produces indole-3-lactic acid (ILA) to protect intestinal epithelial cells in culture via activation of the aryl hydrogen receptor (AhR) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). Thus, prebiotics and synbiotics can also promote the growth and reproduction of probiotics and hence reduce diarrhea in radiotherapy patients.

Probiotics-mediated homeostasis of intestinal microbiota may also prevent other symptoms from radiation enteritis, but more studies are needed to clarify the observation, which is the key to maintaining the biological strategies of healthy intestine during radiotherapy of cancer.

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Maintains the Balance of Gut Microbiota to Improve Radiotherapy-Induced Enteritis

FMT is a treatment method to reestablish the gut microbiota of patients by separating and transplanting the intestinal flora of healthy persons into patient’s intestine tract. In 1958, Eiseman et al. applied FMT to treat Pseudomembranous enteritis caused by the treatment of antibiotics, leading to an improvement of patient’s condition. With the analysis of the 16S rRNA sequencing, Cui et al. confirmed that FMT treatment increases the relative abundance of the intestinal microbiota, such as escalation (or stabilization) of Bacteroidetes (or Lactobacillus), augment of Prevotella at the genus level. In addition, FMT-improved gut microbiota can reduce the intestinal leakage and enhance the intestinal functions and epithelial integrity in radiotherapy-induced enteritis. Ding et al. proved that the intestinal flora diversity of all patients underwent radiotherapy increased after FMT treatment. Radiation-induced intestinal edema was strikingly alleviated after eight weeks of FMT, and the beneficial bacteria such as Alistipes, Phascolarctobacterium, Streptococcus and Bacteroides expanded, whereas the abundance of Faecalibacterium decreased. FMT of gut microbes from healthy donors may reduce the toxicity caused by radiotherapy. In addition, FMT could elevate the level of microbial-derived indole 3-propionic acid (IPA) in the feces of irradiated mice, so that the mice had a lower level of systemic inflammation, a reduced hematopoietic organ injury and catabatic myelosuppression, and improved gastrointestinal tract functions and epithelial integrity. Li et al. proved that FMT increased the level of SCFAs in feces and valeric acid (VA) produced by microbiota exerted the most important radioprotective effect by increasing the expression of keratin 1 (KRT1). VA supplementation increased the survival of irradiated mice, protected their hematopoietic organs, and alleviated gastrointestinal injury of irradiated mice.

Fresh stool used for bacterial transplantation can effectively treat Clostridium difficile infection. For patients with severe Clostridium difficile infection, multiple stool transplantation may effectively relieve diarrhea. FMT capsules were also used to treat pediatric diarrhea and other diseases. It significantly improves both overall and gastrointestinal health after FMT. FMT also has an obvious effect on the treatment of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients prior to FMT treatment exhibited reduced biodiversity and significantly differed in gut microbiota composition characterized by an increase in Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, Haemophilus, and Fusobacterium compared to donors, and an augment in species diversity at 30 days post-FMT treatment. Paramsothy et al. demonstrated that microbiota diversity increased with the persistence of FMT, which could alleviate the clinical symptoms of ulcerative colitis, and was mainly associated with the improvement of microbial diversity. Ishikawa et al. also confirmed that FMT is a potential treatment for restoring normal intestinal flora in patients with ulcerative colitis. Selection of healthy donors for FMT may avoid potential adverse effects transmitted from donor’s feces in the therapy of radiation-induced enteritis. Standardization of this technology and humanization of FMT are two key factors in the usage of the therapy to meet the needs of patients.

Antibiotics Reconstruct the Intestinal Microbiota to Alleviate Radiation-Induced Enteritis

Abdominal radiation disrupts the intestinal microbial balance. It reduces microbiota diversity, and increases the relative abundance of pathogenic bacteria, such as Proteobacteria in mice. Antibiotic cocktail (ABX) and metronidazole pretreatment are beneficial to the reconstruction of gut microbes in irradiated mice. It has been reported that Abx pretreatment effectively reduces the level of LPS in the ileum and inhibits the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling, thereby reducing intestinal inflammation. In addition, Abx pretreatment regulates macrophage polarization in the ileum and downregulates the expression of TGF-β1 and phosphorylated Smad-3 and α-SMA thereby preventing intestinal fibrosis and ultimately improving the survival of mice with radiation-induced intestinal injury. These results indicate that antibiotic pretreatment can effectively alleviate gut microbial disorders and intestinal injury caused by abdominal radiation. In general, these findings have increased our understanding of the radiation enteritis pathogenesis.

Conclusions and Prospects

The intestinal flora is affected by multiple factors, as well as original diseases, such as cancers. Although the location of a disease is far from or not related to the intestinal tract, alterations in health status of the host may also affect the overall homeostasis of intestinal flora. Thus, gut microbiota in various cancer patients may be different as compared with healthy individuals. Studies with strictly selected healthy people for comparison may help to uncover bacterial genera changed in radiation enteritis. In terms of treatment, with intestinal flora in healthy people as references, those in patients with radiation-induced intestinal injury can be manipulated to a comparable level in healthy individuals.

In the current review, we emphasized the relationship between microbiota and radiation enteritis. Radiation reduces the diversity of intestinal flora and modifies gut microbiota composition. We summarized the types of bacteria, which have been changed in radiation enteritis. Alterations in the composition of the intestinal flora aggravate radiation enteritis, which may form a vicious circle and amplify the changes in microbiota. Radiation enteritis could weaken the intestinal epithelial barrier and increase the expression of inflammatory factors. Mounting evidence shows that intestinal microbiota is the initiator for the pathogenesis of radiation enteritis. Targeted treatment of gut microbiota with probiotics, fecal bacteria transplantation and antibiotics can alleviate radiation enteritis. In addition, intestinal flora could be a potential biomarker for radiation enteritis and may help to establish a personalized radiation treatment plan. Further studies regarding the role of intestinal flora in radiation enteritis are needed in order to set up a more reliable preventive strategy for the disease. In the future, on the basis of 16S rRNA sequencing, metabolomics, transcriptomics, shotgun metagenomics, and other state-of-art methods, functions of gut microbiota in radiation enteritis are expected to be explored more extensively. Reversing the changes in microbiome may eventually prove to be an effective therapeutic strategy for patients with life-threatening radiation enteritis.

Author Contributions

YJ wrote the manuscript. Z-XX, YW, DZ, and ML contributed to critical revision of the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81573087, 81772924, and 82020108024) and International Cooperation Foundation Grant of Jilin Province (20190701006GH).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References 99

  1. 1.

    Amar J. Chabo C. Waget A. Klopp P. Vachoux C. Bermudez-Humaran L. G.. (2011 ). Intestinal Mucosal Adherence and Translocation of Commensal Bacteria at the Early Onset of Type 2 Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms and Probiotic Treatment. EMBO Mol. Med.3, 559–572.

    Not in our library10.1002/emmm.201100159

  2. 2.

    Anderson J. M. Van Itallie C. M. (2009 ). Physiology and Function of the Tight Junction. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1, 002584.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a002584

  3. 3.

    Andreyev J. (2005 ). Gastrointestinal Complications of Pelvic Radiotherapy: Are They of Any Importance? Gut 54, 1051–1054.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.2004.062596

  4. 4.

    Barnett D. J. Parker C. L. Blodgett D. W. Wierzba R. K. Links J. M. (2006 ). Understanding Radiologic and Nuclear Terrorism as Public Health Threats: Preparedness and Response Perspectives. J. Nucl. Med. 47, 1653–1661.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1950

  5. 5.

    Barroso-Batista J. Demengeot J. Gordo I. (2015 ). Adaptive Immunity Increases the Pace and Predictability of Evolutionary Change in Commensal Gut Bacteria. Nat. Commun. 6, 8945.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms9945

  6. 6.

    Baumgart D. C. Dignass A. U. (2002 ). Intestinal Barrier Function. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 5, 685–694.

    Not in our library10.1097/00075197-200211000-00012

  7. 7.

    Bazzoni G. Martinez-Estrada O. M. Orsenigo F. Cordenonsi M. Citi S. Dejana E. (2000 ). Interaction of Junctional Adhesion Molecule With the Tight Junction Components ZO-1, Cingulin, and Occludin. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 20520–20526.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m905251199

  8. 8.

    Bentzen S. M. (2006 ). Preventing or Reducing Late Side Effects of Radiation Therapy: Radiobiology Meets Molecular Pathology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 702–713.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1950

  9. 9.
  10. 10.

    Bosset J. F. Calais G. Daban A. Berger C. Radosevic-Jelic L. Maingon P.. (2004 ). Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients: Assessment of Acute Toxicity and Treatment Compliance. Report of the 22921 Randomised Trial Conducted by the EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Eur. J. Cancer40, 219–224.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejca.2003.09.032

  11. 11.

    Bullman S. Pedamallu C. S. Sicinska E. Clancy T. E. Zhang X. Cai D.. (2017 ). Analysis of Fusobacterium Persistence and Antibiotic Response in Colorectal Cancer. Science358, 1443–1448.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aal5240

  12. 12.

    Caballero-Franco C. Keller K. De Simone C. Chadee K. (2007 ). The VSL3 Probiotic Formula Induces Mucin Gene Expression and Secretion in Colonic Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 292, 315–322.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00265.2006

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Ciorba M. A. Riehl T. E. Rao M. S. Moon C. Ee X. Nava G. M.. (2012 ). Lactobacillus Probiotic Protects Intestinal Epithelium From Radiation Injury in a TLR-2/Cyclo-Oxygenase-2-Dependent Manner. Gut61, 829–838.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300367

  15. 15.

    Crawford P. A. Gordon J. I. (2005 ). Microbial Regulation of Intestinal Radiosensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 13254–13259.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0504830102

  16. 16.

    Cui M. Xiao H. Li Y. Zhang S. Dong J. Wang B.. (2019 ). Sexual Dimorphism of Gut Microbiota Dictates Therapeutics Efficacy of Radiation Injuries. Adv. Sci. (Weinh)6, 1901048.

    Not in our library10.1002/advs.201901048

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Demers M. Dagnault A. Desjardins J. (2014 ). A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial: Impact of Probiotics on Diarrhea in Patients Treated With Pelvic Radiation. Clin. Nutr. 33, 761–767.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.015

  19. 19.

    Ding X. Li Q. Li P. Chen X. Xiang L. Bi L.. (2020 ). Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Promising Treatment for Radiation Enteritis? Radiother. Oncol.143, 12–18.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.011

  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    Eiseman B. Silen W. Bascom G. S. Kauvar A. J. (1958 ). Fecal Enema as an Adjunct in the Treatment of Pseudomembranous Enterocolitis. Surgery 44, 854–859.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Ewaschuk J. B. Diaz H. Meddings L. Diederichs B. Dmytrash A. Backer J.. (2008 ). Secreted Bioactive Factors From Bifidobacterium Infantis Enhance Epithelial Cell Barrier Function. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest Liver Physiol.295, 1025–1034.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.90227.2008

  23. 23.

    Feng Q. Liang S. Jia H. Stadlmayr A. Tang L. Lan Z.. (2015 ). Gut Microbiome Development Along the Colorectal Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence. Nat. Commun.6, 6528.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms7528

  24. 24.
  25. 25.

    Florez A. B. Sierra M. Ruas-Madiedo P. Mayo B. (2016 ). Susceptibility of Lactic Acid Bacteria, Bifidobacteria and Other Bacteria of Intestinal Origin to Chemotherapeutic Agents. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 48, 547–550.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.07.011

  26. 26.

    Fuccio L. Guido A. (2013 ). Probiotics Supplementation for the Prevention of Gastrointestinal Radiation-Induced Side Effects: The Time Is Now. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 277.

    Not in our library10.1038/ajg.2012.418

  27. 27.

    García-Lafuente A. Antolín M. Guarner F. Crespo E. Salas A. Forcada P.. (1997 ). Incrimination of Anaerobic Bacteria in the Induction of Experimental Colitis. Am. J. Physiol.272, 10–15.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.1997.272.1.g10

  28. 28.

    Garcia-Peris P. Velasco C. Hernandez M. Lozano M. A. Paron L. de la Cuerda C.. (2016 ). Effect of Inulin and Fructo-Oligosaccharide on the Prevention of Acute Radiation Enteritis in Patients With Gynecological Cancer and Impact on Quality-of-Life: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.70, 170–174.

    Not in our library10.1038/ejcn.2015.192

  29. 29.

    Gorjifard S. Goldszmid R. S. (2015 ). Beating Cancer With a Gut Feeling. Cell Host Microbe 18, 646–648.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2015.11.014

  30. 30.

    Goudarzi M. Mak T. D. Jacobs J. P. Moon B. H. Strawn S. J. Braun J.. (2016 ). An Integrated Multi-Omic Approach to Assess Radiation Injury on the Host-Microbiome Axis. Radiat. Res.186, 219–234.

    Not in our library10.1667/rr14306.1

  31. 31.

    Goyal A. Yeh A. Bush B. R. Firek B. A. Siebold L. M. Rogers M. B.. (2018 ). Safety, Clinical Response, and Microbiome Findings Following Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis.24, 410–421.

    Not in our library10.1093/ibd/izx035

  32. 32.

    Grander C. Adolph T. E. Wieser V. Lowe P. Wrzosek L. Gyongyosi B.. (2018 ). Recovery of Ethanol-Induced Akkermansia Muciniphila Depletion Ameliorates Alcoholic Liver Disease. Gut67, 891–901.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313432

  33. 33.

    Groschwitz K. R. Hogan S. P. (2009 ). Intestinal Barrier Function: Molecular Regulation and Disease Pathogenesis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 124, 3–20; quiz 21-22.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.038

  34. 34.

    Hale M. F. (2020 ). Radiation Enteritis: From Diagnosis to Management. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 36, 208–214.

    Not in our library10.1097/mog.0000000000000632

  35. 35.

    Hansson G. C. Johansson M. E. (2010 ). The Inner of the Two Muc2 Mucin-Dependent Mucus Layers in Colon is Devoid of Bacteria. Gut Microbes 1, 51–54.

    Not in our library10.4161/gmic.1.1.10470

  36. 36.

    Hauer-Jensen M. Denham J. W. Andreyev H. J. (2014 ). Radiation Enteropathy–Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 470–479.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrgastro.2014.46

  37. 37.
  38. 38.

    Hodges P. C. (1964 ). Dr. Emil H. Grubbe, Pioneer Chicago Radiologist. Postgrad. Med. 35, 85–87.

    Not in our library10.1080/00325481.1964.11695172

  39. 39.

    Hogan D. E. Kellison T. (2002 ). Nuclear Terrorism. Am. J. Med. Sci. 323, 341–349.

    Not in our library10.1097/00000441-200206000-00006

  40. 40.

    Hui W. Li T. Liu W. Zhou C. Gao F. (2019 ). Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Treatment of Recurrent C. Difficile Infection: An Updated Randomized Controlled Trial Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 14, 0210016.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0210016

  41. 41.

    Husebye E. Skar V. Hoverstad T. Iversen T. Melby K. (1995 ). Abnormal Intestinal Motor Patterns Explain Enteric Colonization With Gram-Negative Bacilli in Late Radiation Enteropathy. Gastroenterology 109, 1078–1089.

    Not in our library10.1016/0016-5085(95)90565-0

  42. 42.

    Ishikawa D. Sasaki T. Osada T. Kuwahara-Arai K. Haga K. Shibuya T.. (2017 ). Changes in Intestinal Microbiota Following Combination Therapy With Fecal Microbial Transplantation and Antibiotics for Ulcerative Colitis. Inflammation Bowel Dis.23, 116–125.

    Not in our library10.1097/mib.0000000000000975

  43. 43.

    Johnson L. B. Riaz A. A. Adawi D. Wittgren L. Bäck S. Thornberg C.. (2004 ). Radiation Enteropathy and Leucocyte-Endothelial Cell Reactions in a Refined Small Bowel Model. BMC Surg.4, 10.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2482-4-10

  44. 44.

    Jones C. B. Davis C. M. Sfanos K. S. (2020 ). The Potential Effects of Radiation on the Gut-Brain Axis. Radiat. Res. 193, 209–222.

    Not in our library10.1667/rr15493.1

  45. 45.

    Karczewski J. Troost F. J. Konings I. Dekker J. Kleerebezem M. Brummer R. J.. (2010 ). Regulation of Human Epithelial Tight Junction Proteins by Lactobacillus Plantarum In Vivo and Protective Effects on the Epithelial Barrier. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest Liver Physiol.298, 851–859.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00327.2009

  46. 46.

    Keefe D. M. (2007 ). Intestinal Mucositis: Mechanisms and Management. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 19, 323–327.

    Not in our library10.1097/cco.0b013e3281214412

  47. 47.

    Kuhbacher T. Ott S. J. Helwig U. Mimura T. Rizzello F. Kleessen B.. (2006 ). Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota in Relation to Probiotic Therapy (VSL#3) in Pouchitis. Gut55, 833–841.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.2005.078303

  48. 48.
  49. 49.

    Lakhdari O. Tap J. Beguet-Crespel F. Le Roux K. De Wouters T. Cultrone A.. (2011 ). Identification of NF-KappaB Modulation Capabilities Within Human Intestinal Commensal Bacteria. J. BioMed. Biotechnol.2011, 282356.

    Not in our library10.1155/2011/282356

  50. 50.

    Lalla R. V. Bowen J. Barasch A. Elting L. Epstein J. Keefe D. M.. (2014 ). MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Mucositis Secondary to Cancer Therapy. Cancer120, 1453–1461.

    Not in our library10.1002/cncr.28592

  51. 51.

    Le Poul E. Loison C. Struyf S. Springael J. Y. Lannoy V. Decobecq M. E.. (2003 ). Functional Characterization of Human Receptors for Short Chain Fatty Acids and Their Role in Polymorphonuclear Cell Activation. J. Biol. Chem.278, 25481–25489.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m301403200

  52. 52.

    Ley R. E. Backhed F. Turnbaugh P. Lozupone C. A. Knight R. D. Gordon J. I. (2005 ). Obesity Alters Gut Microbial Ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 11070–11075.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0504978102

  53. 53.

    Lian Q. Xu J. Yan S. Huang M. Ding H. Sun X.. (2017 ). Chemotherapy-Induced Intestinal Inflammatory Responses are Mediated by Exosome Secretion of Double-Strand DNA via AIM2 Inflammasome Activation. Cell Res.27, 784–800.

    Not in our library10.1038/cr.2017.54

  54. 54.

    Li Y. Dong J. Xiao H. Zhang S. Wang B. Cui M.. (2020 a). Gut Commensal Derived-Valeric Acid Protects Against Radiation Injuries. Gut Microbes11, 789–806.

    Not in our library10.1080/19490976.2019.1709387

  55. 55.

    Li Y. Xiao H. Dong J. Luo D. Wang H. Zhang S.. (2020 b). Gut Microbiota Metabolite Fights Against Dietary Polysorbate 80-Aggravated Radiation Enteritis. Front. Microbiol.11, 1450.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2020.01450

  56. 56.

    Manichanh C. Varela E. Martinez C. Antolin M. Llopis M. Dore J.. (2008 ). The Gut Microbiota Predispose to the Pathophysiology of Acute Postradiotherapy Diarrhea. Am. J. Gastroenterol.103, 1754–1761.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01868.x

  57. 57.

    Marin M. Gudiol C. Ardanuy C. Garcia-Vidal C. Calvo M. Arnan M.. (2014 ). Bloodstream Infections in Neutropenic Patients With Cancer: Differences Between Patients With Haematological Malignancies and Solid Tumours. J. Infection69, 417–423.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.018

  58. 58.

    Maslowski K. M. Vieira A. T. Ng A. Kranich J. Sierro F. Yu D.. (2009 ). Regulation of Inflammatory Responses by Gut Microbiota and Chemoattractant Receptor GPR43. Nature461, 1282–1286.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08530

  59. 59.

    Maynard C. L. Elson C. O. Hatton R. D. Weaver C. T. (2012 ). Reciprocal Interactions of the Intestinal Microbiota and Immune System. Nature 489, 231–241.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11551

  60. 60.

    Mimura T. Rizzello F. Helwig U. Poggioli G. Schreiber S. Talbot I.. (2004 ). Once Daily High Dose Probiotic Therapy (VSL#3) for Maintaining Remission in Recurrent or Refractory Pouchitis. Gut53, 108–114.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.53.1.108

  61. 61.
  62. 62.
  63. 63.

    Paramsothy S. Kamm M. A. Kaakoush N. O. Walsh A. J. Van Den Bogaerde J. Samuel D.. (2017 ). Multidonor Intensive Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. Lancet389, 1218–1228.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30182-4

  64. 64.
  65. 65.

    Redman M. G. Ward E. J. Phillips R. S. (2014 ). The Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics in People With Cancer: A Systematic Review. Ann. Oncol. 25, 1919–1929.

    Not in our library10.1093/annonc/mdu106

  66. 66.

    Reiff C. Kelly D. (2010 ). Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Gut Bacteria and Probiotic Therapy. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300, 25–33.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.08.004

  67. 67.

    Ren R. R. Sun G. Yang Y. S. Peng L. H. Wang S. F. Shi X. H.. (2016 ). Chinese Physicians’ Perceptions of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. World J. Gastroenterol.22, 4757–4765.

    Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4757

  68. 68.

    Riedel C. U. Foata F. Philippe D. Adolfsson O. Eikmanns B. J. Blum S. (2006 ). Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Bifidobacteria by Inhibition of LPS-Induced NF-KappaB Activation. World J. Gastroenterol. 12, 3729–3735.

    Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v12.i23.3729

  69. 69.

    Riehl T. E. Alvarado D. Ee X. Zuckerman A. Foster L. Kapoor V.. (2019 ). Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG Protects the Intestinal Epithelium From Radiation Injury Through Release of Lipoteichoic Acid, Macrophage Activation and the Migration of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Gut68, 1003–1013.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316226

  70. 70.

    Roy S. Trinchieri G. (2017 ). Microbiota: A Key Orchestrator of Cancer Therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 271–285.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc.2017.13

  71. 71.

    Sánchez de Medina F. Romero-Calvo I. Mascaraque C. Martínez-Augustin O. (2014 ). Intestinal Inflammation and Mucosal Barrier Function. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 20, 2394–2404.

    Not in our library10.1097/mib.0000000000000204

  72. 72.

    Sartor R. B. (2006 ). Mechanisms of Disease: Pathogenesis of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 3, 390–407.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncpgasthep0528

  73. 73.

    Schulz M. D. Atay C. Heringer J. Romrig F. K. Schwitalla S. Aydin B.. (2014 ). High-Fat-Diet-Mediated Dysbiosis Promotes Intestinal Carcinogenesis Independently of Obesity. Nature514, 508–512.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13398

  74. 74.

    Sender R. Fuchs S. Milo R. (2016 ). Are We Really Vastly Outnumbered? Revisiting the Ratio of Bacterial to Host Cells in Humans. Cell 164, 337–340.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.013

  75. 75.

    Shaw C. Taylor L. (2012 ). Treatment-Related Diarrhea in Patients With Cancer. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 16, 413–417.

    Not in our library10.1188/12.cjon.413-417

  76. 76.

    Shen Z. Wang J. Huang Q. Shi Y. Wei Z. Zhang X.. (2018 ). Genetic Modification to Induce CXCR2 Overexpression in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhances Treatment Benefits in Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis. Cell Death Dis.9, 229.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41419-018-0310-x

  77. 77.

    Sherman P. M. Johnson-Henry K. C. Yeung H. P. Ngo P. S. C. Goulet J. Tompkins T. A. (2005 ). Probiotics Reduce Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli O157: H7-And Enteropathogenic E-Coli O127: H6-Induced Changes in Polarized T84 Epithelial Cell Monolayers by Reducing Bacterial Adhesion and Cytoskeletal Rearrangements. Infect. Immun. 73, 5183–5188.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.73.8.5183-5188.2005

  78. 78.

    Siegel R. Desantis C. Virgo K. Stein K. Mariotto A. Smith T.. (2012 ). Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Statistic. CA Cancer J. Clin.62, 220–241.

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.21149

  79. 79.

    Sokol H. Adolph T. E. (2018 ). The Microbiota: An Underestimated Actor in Radiation-Induced Lesions? Gut 67, 1–2.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314279

  80. 80.

    Sommer F. Backhed F. (2013 ). The Gut Microbiota - Masters of Host Development and Physiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 227–238.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2974

  81. 81.

    Sonis S. T. (2004 ). The Pathobiology of Mucositis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 277–284.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1318

  82. 82.

    Sonis S. T. Elting L. S. Keefe D. Peterson D. E. Schubert M. Hauer-Jensen M.. (2004 ). Perspectives on Cancer Therapy-Induced Mucosal Injury: Pathogenesis, Measurement, Epidemiology, and Consequences for Patients. Cancer100, 1995–2025.

    Not in our library10.1002/cncr.20162

  83. 83.

    Sonnenburg J. L. Backhed F. (2016 ). Diet-Microbiota Interactions as Moderators of Human Metabolism. Nature 535, 56–64.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature18846

  84. 84.

    Stringer A. M. (2013 ). Interaction Between Host Cells and Microbes in Chemotherapy-Induced Mucositis. Nutrients 5, 1488–1499.

    Not in our library10.3390/nu5051488

  85. 85.

    Stringer A. M. Al-Dasooqi N. Bowen J. M. Tan T. H. Radzuan M. Logan R. M.. (2013 ). Biomarkers of Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhoea: A Clinical Study of Intestinal Microbiome Alterations, Inflammation and Circulating Matrix Metalloproteinases. Support Care Cancer21, 1843–1852.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00520-013-1741-7

  86. 86.

    Tankou S. K. Regev K. Healy B. C. Cox L. M. Tjon E. Kivisakk P.. (2018 ). Investigation of Probiotics in Multiple Sclerosis. Mult. Scler.24, 58–63.

    Not in our library10.1177/1352458517737390

  87. 87.

    Tarricone R. Abu Koush D. Nyanzi-Wakholi B. Medina-Lara A. (2016 ). A Systematic Literature Review of the Economic Implications of Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhea and Its Impact on Quality of Life. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 99, 37–48.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.12.012

  88. 88.

    Theis V. S. Sripadam R. Ramani V. Lal S. (2010 ). Chronic Radiation Enteritis. Clin. Oncol. (R Coll. Radiol) 22, 70–83.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clon.2009.10.003

  89. 89.

    Ulluwishewa D. Anderson R. C. Mcnabb W. C. Moughan P. J. Wells J. M. Roy N. C. (2011 ). Regulation of Tight Junction Permeability by Intestinal Bacteria and Dietary Components. J. Nutr. 141, 769–776.

    Not in our library10.3945/jn.110.135657

  90. 90.

    Uribe G. Villéger R. Bressollier P. Dillard R. N. Worthley D. L. Wang T. C.. (2018 ). Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG Increases Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression and Prostaglandin E2 Secretion in Colonic Myofibroblasts via a MyD88-Dependent Mechanism During Homeostasis. Cell Microbiol.20, 12871.

    Not in our library10.1111/cmi.12871

  91. 91.
  92. 92.
  93. 93.

    Wang Y. Xiang G. S. Kourouma F. Umar S. (2006 ). Citrobacter Rodentium-Induced NF-KappaB Activation in Hyperproliferating Colonic Epithelia: Role of P65 (Ser536) Phosphorylation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 148, 814–824.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.bjp.0706784

  94. 94.
  95. 95.

    Xu J. Gordon J. I. (2003 ). Honor Thy Symbionts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 10452–10459.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1734063100

  96. 96.

    Xu L. Zhang T. Cui B. He Z. Xiang J. Long C.. (2016 ). Clinical Efficacy Maintains Patients’ Positive Attitudes Toward Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Medicine (Baltimore)95, 4055.

    Not in our library10.1097/md.0000000000004055

  97. 97.

    Youngster I. Russell G. H. Pindar C. Ziv-Baran T. Sauk J. Hohmann E. L. (2014 ). Oral, Capsulized, Frozen Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Relapsing Clostridium Difficile Infection. JAMA 312, 1772–1778.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2014.13875

  98. 98.

    Zhao Z. Cheng W. Qu W. Shao G. Liu S. (2020 ). Antibiotic Alleviates Radiation-Induced Intestinal Injury by Remodeling Microbiota, Reducing Inflammation, and Inhibiting Fibrosis. ACS Omega 5, 2967–2977.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsomega.9b03906

  99. 99.

    Zihni C. Mills C. Matter K. Balda M. S. (2016 ). Tight Junctions: From Simple Barriers to Multifunctional Molecular Gates. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 564–580.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm.2016.80

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.