No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.
Connective Tissue Growth Factor: From Molecular Understandings to Drug Discovery
Zihao Chen, Ning Zhang, Hang Yin Chu and 4 more
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · 2020 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is a key signaling and regulatory molecule involved in different biological processes, such as cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and wound healing, as well as multiple pathologies, such as tumor development and tissue fibrosis. Although the underlying mechanisms of CTGF remain incompletely understood, a commonly accepted theory is that the interactions between different protein domains in CTGF and other various regulatory proteins and ligands contribute to its variety of functions. Here, we highlight the structure of each domain of CTGF and its biology functions in physiological conditions. We further summarized main diseases that are deeply influenced by CTGF domains and the potential targets of these diseases. Finally, we address the advantages and disadvantages of current drugs targeting CTGF and provide the perspective for the drug discovery of the next generation of CTGF inhibitors based on aptamers.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CTGF) and CCN Family
CTGF, also known as CCN2, is a 38 kDa, cysteine-rich (22 cysteines in the N-terminal and 16 cysteines in the C-terminal region), extracellular matrix protein that belongs to the CCN family of proteins. The term ‘connective tissue growth factor’ was introduced to describe a novel polypeptide growth factor that stimulated DNA synthesis and chemotaxis in fibroblast. There are other five CCN gene family genes: CCN1 (Cyr61), CCN3 (NOV), CCN4 (WISP1), CCN5 (WISP2), and CCN6 (WISP3). The CCN acronym was introduced from the names of the first three members of the family to be discovered: Cyr61 (cysteine-rich protein 61), CTGF (connective tissue growth factor) and NOV (nephroblastoma overexpressed gene). Expression of CTGF is crucial to embryonic development in childhood, for example, mice with CTGF knockout have multiple skeletal dysmorphisms and perinatal lethality. Also, abnormal expression of CTGF was detected in several adulthood diseases including fibrosis and malignancy in major organs and tissues.
Expression Profiles for CTGF in Human
Connective tissue growth factor expression was initially discovered in endothelial cells and fibroblasts associated with connective tissue regeneration and wound healing, and then was detected in many tissues. Here, we illustrate the expression of CTGF in different organisms based on gene expression data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project (Figure 1). The project contains expression data obtained from 54 non-diseased tissue sites across nearly 1000 individuals. CTGF expression is higher in blood vessels and lungs compared to other organs or tissues, which emphasize the role of CTGF in the development of blood vessels and lungs. Low expression of CTGF mRNA was observed in brain tissues by GTEx project, however, the previous study showed that the adult cerebral cortex strongly expresses CTGF mRNA.
The proper expression of CTGF is essential for the physiological process of multiple organs such as bone, brain, heart, and lung. CTGF knockout mice demonstrated developmental skeletal malformations. High expression of CTGF will negatively regulates myelination during development, which has been implicated in a range of neurodevelopmental disorders. CTGF mRNA was highly expressed in developing blood vessels and large blood vessels of the adult heart, suggesting that it may be involved in the maintenance of blood vessel integrity during adulthood. The absence of CTGF and/or its protein product, CTGF, may induce pulmonary hypoplasia by disrupting basic lung developmental processes.
Protein Domains in CTGF
CTGF (6q23.2) is a relatively short gene and consists of 5 exons that code for a 349-amino acid protein, the first exon codes for a signal peptide (for secretion) and exons 2–5 code for each of the four different domains. The four functional domains are insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP), von Willebrand factor type C repeat (VWC), thrombospondin type-1 repeat (TSP1 or TSR), and cysteine knot-containing domain (CT) (Figure 2). IGFBP and VWC domains constitute the N-terminal half of CTGF which is separated from the C-terminal half that contains TSP1 and CT domains by a ‘hinge’ region. In this study, the boundaries for domains were defined by ‘P29279’ of UniProtKB database with IGFBP domain (GLN27-LYS98), VWC domain (ALA101-ASP167), TSP1 domain (ASN198-GLU243), and CT domain (CYS256-PRO330).
The functions of CTGF domains are different because of their distinct bindings with specific proteins in various signaling pathways (Figure 2). Since these binding proteins participate in a number of physiological processes, CTGF has been shown to regulate a wide range of important functional pathways, including adhesion, mitogenesis, and chemotaxis, cell survival, differentiation, angiogenesis, chondrogenesis, tumorigenesis, and wound healing. Although some biological functions are directly related to an individual functional domain, many functions are demonstrated to be the consequence of domains acting in concert. For example, truncated CTGF domains (N-terminal fragment and C-terminal fragment), can function independently to stimulate differentiation or proliferation of fibroblast and to increase collagen synthesis.
Connective tissue growth factor protein contains 38 fully conserved cysteine residues, which are evenly spread throughout the protein (1 in signal peptide region, 11 in IGFBP, 10 in VWC, 6 in TSP1, and 10 in CT) except for a cysteine free-region between Asp167 and Asn198 (‘hinge region’). Disulfide bond was formed by a reaction between the sulfhydryl side chains of two cysteine residues, and had an essential role in the stabilization of peptide and protein structures and modulation of biological activities. In CTGF, the functions of disulfide bond can be summarized: (1) To stabilize the structure of CTGF by linking the secondary structures such as β-sheets. (2) To form the ‘cysteine knot’ in CT domain of CTGF, and the cysteine knot is crucial for dimerization of proteins and binding with other receptors or growth factors.
The Structure and Biological Functions of CTGF Domains
Three-dimensional (3D) structure of the protein is crucial for its interaction with other molecules and biological functions. Currently, there is no accurate structural information about the CTGF. Homology modeling is a computational method and predicts reliable 3D structure of a query protein through the sequence alignment of template proteins. In current study, we predicted 3D structures of individual domains of CTGF by using Modeller. The amino acid sequence of CTGF was retrieved from NCBI and the accession number ‘CAG46534.1’ was selected for the present study. The templates for predicting the structure of domains were searched by Swiss-model server and then listed in Table 1. For each domain, 50 structures were created by the Modeller and the predicted structure with lowest dope value was considered the highest quality and then selected for structure evaluation (Supplementary Figures S1A–D). The structure evaluation was done by the Ramchandran plot in PROCHECK, and the results showed a good quality of structure since all residues were located in the allowed area (Table 2).
IGFBP Domain
The first domain of CTGF, named as IGFBP domain, is coded by the exon 2 of CTGF and located in the sequence of Gln27-Lys98. The name of IGFBP domain comes from its similar structure with IGFBP family proteins which contain a conserved motif ‘GCGCCXXC,’ thus CTGF has been characterized as a member of the IGFBP superfamily. There are two major sub-domains in the CTGF-IGFBP domain (Figure 3A), and the first sub-domain (SD1) is constituted by a 2-stranded β-sheet and two disulfide bonds in the N-terminal of IGFBP domain. The β-sheet, disulfide bond, and conserved ‘GCGCCxxC’ motif, forms a rigid base that supports the binding of CTGF and IGF. The second sub-domain (SD2) consists of a globular sub-domain centered around a 2-stranded anti-parallel β-sheet in the C-terminal of IGFBP domain. The site for binding insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) is located in the SD2.
IGFBP family proteins exert critical roles in a variety of cellular functions including amino acid and glucose uptake, cell cycle, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and immune response through its binding with IGFs. As a member of IGFBP family proteins, the specificity of binding between IGFs and CTGF is further confirmed by competitive affinity binding assays using unlabeled IGF-I and IGF-II. However, the affinity of CTGF-IGFs interaction is only about one percent of the affinity of other IGFBP family proteins (IGFBPI-VI) to IGFs. The lower affinity of CTGF with IGFs which is thought to be the consequence of the lack of C-terminal of IGFBP family proteins. This low affinity makes CTGF promote IGFs’ function by prolonging the circulating half-life of IGFs and increasing the bioavailability of IGFs, unlike other classic IGFBPs which block the interaction between IGFs and their receptors due to their high affinity to IGFs. For example, overexpression of CTGF enhances the expression of IGFs, activates IGFs mediated proliferation and proteoglycan synthesis in cultured chondrocytes. CTGF is also found to bind with IGFs and contributes to the matrix accumulation in tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Apart from IGF-dependent manner, IGFBP domain enables the linkage of CTGF to fibronectin, a prominent component of extracellular matrix (ECM), and enhances cell adhesion and matrix deposition which leads to liver fibrosis. Taken together, the main functions of IGFBP domain of CTGF include: (a) To stimulate proliferation of chondrocytes; (b) To increase matrix accumulation in both IGF-dependent and IGF-independent manner.
VWC Domain
The second domain presented in the N-terminal of CTGF is VWC domain which is coded by the exon 3 of CTGF and located in Ala101-Asp167. This domain, also known as the chordin-like cysteine rich (CR) repeat which has been shown to bind members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) superfamily, is found in more than 500 ECM proteins. There are two sub-domains in the VWC domain of CTGF (Figure 3B). The first sub-domain (SD1) is more structured and consists of a short 2-stranded anti-parallel β-sheet followed by a 3-stranded anti-parallel β-sheet in the N-terminal part of VWC domain. The 3-stranded anti-parallel β-sheet is supported by a disulfide bond between its second and third strand, and another disulfide bond forms between short 2- stranded β-sheet and 3-stranded anti-parallel β-sheet. The second sub-domain (SD2) is comprised of random coils with no secondary structure elements in the C-terminal part of VWC domain. SD2 is devoid of regular secondary structure, although it is tethered by one disulfide bond within itself and one disulfide bond to SD1.
The cellular function of VWC domain may come from the interaction with TGFβ and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). CTGF binds TGFβ with low affinity and functions as a chaperone to escort TGFβ to its receptors. CTGF can strengthen the profibrotic functions of TGFβ in particular proliferation of fibroblasts and secretion of ECM proteins by the fibroblasts. The strengthened TGFβ induces the higher expression of CTGF, which forms a positive feedback loop. This partnership has been implicated in many diseases (e.g., cancers and fibrotic diseases). Besides, CTGF acts via glial-derived TGFβ, whose activity it potentiates, promoting SMAD-dependent apoptosis of newborn neurons in the glomerular layer of brain. VWC domain also exists in crossveinless-2 (CV2), and the similarity of VWC domain in CTGF to CV2 is 31.8%. The SD1 of VWC domain of CV2 is responsible for CV2-BMP2 binding, implying CTGF might also bind to BMP2 by SD1 of VWC domain. Binding of CTGF-VWC domain to BMPs inhibits BMPs signaling by preventing the binding of BMPs to their cognate receptors. To date, BMP family proteins, such as BMP-2, BMP-4, BMP-6, and BMP-7 have been demonstrated to be negatively influenced by CTGF in different cell types. The previous study found that CTGF knockout increased BMP signaling and overexpression of CTGF decreased BMP signaling in osteoblasts.
Taken together, the major functions of VWC domain of CTGF may include: (a) To interact with TGFβ to induce fibrosis and apoptosis of newborn neurons; (b) To bind with BMPs to suppress the differentiation of chondrocytes and osteoblasts.
The exon 3 of CTGF not only encodes the VWC domain but also a region devoid of cysteines that may serve as a ‘hinge’ connecting the N-terminal and C-terminal halves of CTGF. This ‘hinge’ region is unique to each CCN family member and contains an abundance of charged amino acids. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been shown to cleave CTGF in the unstructured hinge region between VWC domains and TSP1 domain. The cleavage of hinge is very crucial for CTGF’s function. Since the N-terminal fragment conceals the binding site of C-terminal fragment of CTGF in intact CTGF, the full length of CTGF is an inactive precursor. The cleavage of the CTGF hinge by MMPs releases the C-terminal fragment which is responsible for activation of Akt and the ERK pathway.
TSP1 Domain
The third domain of CTGF, also known as TSP1 domain, corresponds to the sequence of Asn198-Glu243. TSP1 domain was firstly identified in human endothelial cell thrombospondin-1 protein and then turned out to be one of the most common motifs in a variety of extracellular proteins. CTGF-TSP1 domain contains six cysteines and an identical motif ‘CSXXCG’ to TSP1 domain of thrombospondin-1 protein. The main character of TSP1 domain of thrombospondin-1 protein is the three anti-parallel strands, placing the N- and C-termini at opposite ends of domain. And strand I is more irregular since it does not form a regular β strand, while strands II and III form a regular antiparallel-sheet. However, in the structure of CTGF-TSP1 domain, none of the strand I (Cys199-Gly214), strands II (Ser218-Asn223) and strands III (Lys232-Cys237) form a regular β-sheet (Figure 3D). CTGF-TSP1 domain is more open, with strand I, strand II and strand III are more separate from each other, which makes it less possible to form H-bonds, disulfide bonds, and β-sheets.
The main binding proteins of TSP1 domain include integrin α6β1, low density lipoprotein receptor-associated protein (LRP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). CTGF could bind with integrin α6β1 by ‘CLVQTTEWSACSKTCGM’ (Cys199-Met215) in TSP1 domain, evidenced by the inhibited collagen deposition in fibroblasts caused by exogenous CTGF peptide (Cys199-Met215) treatments. In addition, CTGF could bind with LRP by ‘TEWSACSKTCG’ (Thr204-Gly214) in TSP1 domain, evidenced by a 50% decrease in hepatic stellate cell adhesion by exogenous CTGF peptide (Thr204-Gly214) treatments. However, the accurate binding site of TSP1 domain to VEGF remains unknown.
Integrin α6β1 is a well characterized laminin receptor and participates in ECM interactions. CTGF mediates collagen deposition by the binding between TSP1 domain and integrin α6β1. LRP acts as a signaling receptor and can regulate diverse processes such as repair, remodeling, and embryonic development. Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) adhesion, which is a critical event in hepatic fibrosis, is promoted by CTGF through its binding to LRP in CTGF-TSP1 domain. VEGF is a strong angiogenic mitogen and plays an important role in angiogenesis under various pathophysiological conditions. CTGF inhibits the function of VEGF through the binding between TSP1 domain and VEGF, which leads to the decreased angiogenic activity. The main function of TSP1 domain can be concluded: (a) To promote collagen deposition by integrin α6β1; (b) To increase HSCs adhesion by LRP; (c) To inhibit angiogenesis by VEGF.
CT Domain
The fourth domain which is located in Cys256-Pro330 and encoded by exon 5 of CTGF. This domain contains a ‘cystine knot’ (CT) structure, therefore this domain is named as CT domain. The CT domain is also presented in growth factors including the TGFβ superfamily, platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) and nerve growth factors (NGFs). Cysteine knot is an 8-residues ring based around a two-stranded anti-parallel β-sheet (with each strand at least 4 residues long) linked by disulfide bonds. In the structure of CTGF-CT domain, cysteine knot consists a two-stranded anti-parallel β-sheet and two disulfide bonds (Figure 3E). The CT is highly conducive to protein stability which can be attributed to conformational rigidity endowed by disulfide bonds of the CT. The CT also probably has a role in dimerization of proteins and may be involved in receptor binding of growth factors.
Cystine knot domain has been reported to bind with ECM proteins (e.g., fibronectin), integrins (e.g., α5β1 and αvβ3) and LRP6. CT domain enables the linkage of CTGF to fibronectin, and promotes cell adhesion and migration. Integrin α5β1 is involved in the interaction of CT domain with the fibronectin which contributes to the ECM accumulation in fibrosis disorders. CTGF enhances integrin-fibronectin binding and their function by forming a ternary complex. The sequence ‘GVCTDGR’ (Gly285-Arg291) mediates the binding between CT and integrin α5β1 and promotes cell adhesion and migration. Integrin αvβ3 plays important roles in regulating cell adhesion and migration, as well as angiogenesis. CTGF-CT domain can bind with αvβ3 and promote the above functions of αvβ3 in the sequence of ‘IRTPKISKPIKFELSG’ (Ile257–Gly272). LRP6 is a key protein in Wnt pathway and contributes to pericyte migration, myofibroblast differentiation, and matrix accumulation. It has been widely reported that CTGF can bind with LRP6 and further regulates Wnt signaling. However, the actual role of CTGF-LRP6 interaction in regulating Wnt signaling is still unclear. Most studies showed that CTGF could activate Wnt signaling. Whereas it also has been reported that CTGF competes with Wnt family members for binding to LRP6 in Xenopus laevis embryos. The main function of CT domain includes: (a) To induce ECM deposition by fibronectin; (b) To promote cell adhesion and angiogenesis by integrins α5β1 and αvβ3, respectively; (c) To regulate Wnt signaling by LRP6.
Full Length CTGF
Homology modeling of full length CTGF (FL-CTGF) could not be performed due to the lack of acceptable templates for FL-CTGF. Thus, a strategy of predicting the structure of FL-CTGF by assembling the structures of domains was adopted in this research. The 3D structure files of these four domains and the alignment files were used as templates for Homology modeling to predict the 3D structure of FL-CTGF. The predicted structure with the lowest dope value was chosen for the best structure of FL-CTGF, and the structure assessment by Ramachandran plot indicated the good quality of FL-CTGF structure since none of the residues were located in disallowed regions (Table 2). We calculated the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) to measure the similarity between structures of individual domain and FL-CTGF, and the results showed that the FL-CTGF retained the same architecture as of individual domain since zero RMSD were found. We also found that there were some interactions between domains. In this study, a pair of residues were defined to be in contact when the distance between their C-beta atoms (C-alpha in the case of glycine) was less than 8 Angstroms. The result indicated 60 pairs of interacted residues between VWC and TSP1 domain, and 31 pairs of interacted residues between VWC and CT domain (Supplementary Table S1).
Molecular Understandings of CTGF in Diseases
As introduced above, CTGF has important roles in many biological processes, including cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, angiogenesis, skeletal development, and tissue wound repair. Meanwhile, it is critically involved in various diseases, including cancers, fibrotic diseases, and inflammatory diseases.
Cancers
Key roles for CTGF are to promote myofibroblast differentiation and angiogenesis. Similar mechanisms are active in different cancers where CTGF is expressed. To date, 30 types of human cancers have been linked to deregulated aberrant expression of CTGF (Table 3). Cancers can be divided into 3 categories according to the role of CTGF in tumor development: tumor promotion (Group I), suppression (Group II), and both (Group III).
In Group I, CTGF expression is positively associated with poor survival outcomes and clinicopathological findings, including advanced stage, larger tumor size, and increased metastasis. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is the process where epithelial cells acquire a mesenchymal cell phenotype which is more prone to migrate and invade. CTGF and its binding proteins TGFβ are major initiators of EMT process and contribute to the tumor progression in tumors such as breast cancer. Another key role of CTGF in tumor development is angiogenesis. The high expression level of CTGF enhances angiogenesis in breast cancer and osteosarcoma by integrin αvβ3. Integrin αvβ3 plays a role in angiogenesis mostly by sprouting endothelial cells, therefore promotes invasion and metastasis in cancers such as glioma and breast cancer. Taken together, CTGF interacts with TGFβ and integrin αvβ3, respectively, and contributes to cancer development in Group I. The binding domain of CTGF for TGFβ is VWC domain, and CT domain is responsible for the binding of CTGF to integrin αvβ3.
In Group II, CTGF may act as a tumor suppressor. In these cases, the expression level of CTGF is usually lower in the tumor tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. CTGF expression is suppressed in non-small cell lung cancer cells, and the decreased expression of CTGF may play a role in lung tumorigenesis by allowing IGF-I to have greater progrowth activity, which is different from the pro-IGF function in physiological endochondral ossification process. In addition, CTGF can inhibit lung adenocarcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo by reducing VEGF gene expression and its subsequent angiogenic effects. Depressed CTGF triggers non-canonical Wnt pathway-mediated intestinal cancer progression through an increase in cancer stemness and acquisition of chemoresistance. Taken together, IGFBP, TSP1, and CT domains of CTGF are responsible for interaction with IGF-I, VEGF, and LRP6, respectively, to regulate the cancer progression in Group II.
In Group III, CTGF can act both positively and negatively in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. CTGF expression is lower in ovarian cancer cell lines compared to normal ovarian cells, whereas CTGF expression has a higher expression in advanced stages (stages III and IV) than earlier stages (stages I and II). The expression of CTGF is higher in primary gallbladder cancer compared with normal gallbladder tissue, however, CTGF expression in advanced gallbladder cancer is reduced to the levels of normal gallbladder epithelium. High CTGF expression correlates with a better survival outcome in advanced gallbladder cancer. To date, the detailed functions and mechanisms of CTGF in Group III cancers remain unclear.
Therefore, whether CTGF has a positive or negative correlation with tumor growth is related to the type and stage of cancer. The bindings between proteins with CTGF domains which exert distinct effects on tumor development may lead to the different functions of CTGF in cancers. For example, CTGF expression can inhibit tumor growth by reducing VEGF mediated angiogenic effects through TSP1 domain and enhance angiogenesis and osteosarcoma through the binding between CT domain and integrin αvβ3. However, current investigations for CTGF in cancers have been conducted in different subjects including cell lines, animals, and patients, which may cause inconsistent conclusions. Moreover, some limitations such as small sample size might compromise the results. Therefore, more investigations for the functional roles and underlying mechanisms of CTGF in different cancers are required.
Despite CTGF shows different functions in tumorigenesis, targeting CTGF has shown therapeutic promises in specific cancers such as breast cancer and pancreatic cancer. In breast cancer, blocking CTGF by its VWC domain greatly decreased osteolytic bone metastasis and angiogenesis. In pancreatic cancer, tumor cell growth can be dramatically reduced by using genetic inhibition of CTGF. For these cancers, the VWC domain and CT domain of CTGF has a critical role in promoting tumor progression, which could be the potential targets.
Fibrotic Disorders
Fibrosis is defined by the pathological accumulation of ECM proteins, which is in essence an exaggerated wound healing response that interferes with normal organ function. Fibrosis contributes to the morbidity and mortality associated with organ failure in a variety of chronic diseases affecting the lung, kidneys, eyes, heart, liver, and skin. High expression of CTGF is induced by many cytokines (e.g., TGFβ, VEGF, and integrins) and conditions associated with pathophysiology in fibrotic tissue. CTGF activates myofibroblast formation by transdifferentiating other cells, such as resident fibroblasts, and epithelial cells. CTGF also increases the expression of different cytokines, including TGFβ, VEGF, and integrins, which in turn further increase CTGF expression, resulting in positive feedback loops. Among various fibrotic diseases, CTGF has been extensively studied in pulmonary fibrosis, Cardiac fibrosis, liver fibrosis, renal fibrosis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), and ocular disorders.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, and fatal pulmonary fibrotic disease with unknown etiology. Excessive ECM disposition and fibrosis due to the imbalance between the profibrotic and antifibrotic events is the primary event of IPF. Plasma CTGF levels are significantly higher in patients with IPF than healthy volunteers. CTGF-deficient animals have fewer myofibroblasts and ECM disposition, indicating that CTGF is necessary for the induction of fibrosis in these animals. Overexpression of CTGF, in cooperation with TGFβ, is profibrotic and exacerbates ECM production in animal lung tissue. The severity of alveolitis and fibrosis in the mouse model of lung fibrosis was markedly attenuated by CTGF inhibition.
COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) is caused by a novel coronavirus, named as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and has emerged as a pandemic and a public health crisis of global proportions. The pathological changes of severe COVID-19 include diffuse alveolar damage and multi-organ dysfunction. Lung fibrosis is deeply involved in COVID-19 development. Pulmonary fibrosis was observed in patients with COVID-19 and in the fatal cases of COVID-19. About 40% of patients with COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that results in lung fibrosis as a long-term outcome. CTGF and TGFβ were found to be increased in the alveolar epithelial cells inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. As a potential therapeutic target of fibrosis, the anti-CTGF therapies are desirable to mitigate lung fibrosis in severe COVID-19 and facilitate COVID-19 recovery.
Chronic liver disease can lead to the permanent loss of hepatocyte mass and replacement by fibrotic tissue, which can ultimately lead to severe architectural disturbance. CTGF is highly expressed in fibrotic livers and its level in sera correlates significantly with fibrogenic activity. Although a lot of attention has gone to the collaboration of TGFβ and CTGF to pro-fibrotic effect, CTGF may also contribute to the ECM accumulation in fibrotic tissues by direct molecular interactions with matrix components. For example, CTGF induces adhesion of activated HSCs by the interaction between CT domain to integrin αvβ3 and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). Some studies have shown that CTGF inhibition could reduce liver fibrosis in experimental and clinical settings.
Cardiac fibrosis is a common pathologic consequence of stress insult to the heart and often occurs in the context of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Cardiac fibrosis is characterized by abnormal deposition of fibrotic ECM that compromises cardiac function. The abundance of mRNA for CTGF is positively correlated with myocardial fibrosis areas in diastolic dysfunction patients. Serum response factor (SRF), a transcription factor that could promote the proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts, induced the expression of CTGF in mouse cardiomyocytes. CTGF deletion effectively inhibited TGFβ-induced collagen production in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Administration of the CTGF-antibody significantly improved cardiac fibrosis and enhanced left ventricular function in the mouse model. However, CTGF inhibition for the treatment of heart diseases has not been studied in clinical trials.
Kidney fibrosis is a final common pathway of chronic kidney disease (CKD) irrespective of etiology. The excessive deposition of ECM in the interstitial compartment leads to scar tissue formation. Upon injury, tubule epithelial cells may undergo EMT which results in tubular function impairment, triggers cell cycle arrest and promotes the release of CTGF. Thus, overexpression of CTGF has been observed in many renal fibrotic disorders including diabetic nephropathy (DN), chronic allograft nephropathy, IgA nephropathy. CTGF derived from proximal tubule epithelial cells (PTC) mediated both renal fibroblast proliferation and myofibroblast differentiation. Moreover, it was shown that CTGF expression was induced in primary PTC, through a myocardin-related transcription factor (MRTF) and SRF pathway. Apart from TGFβ and integrins, CTGF could also interact with LRP6 and activate Wnt pathway to enhance collagen expression in tubular epithelial cells in vitro. CTGF inhibition significantly ameliorates the development of renal interstitial fibrosis in vivo.
In DMD and the mdx mouse model, the resultant myofibre degeneration and necrosis caused by the absence of the cytoskeletal protein dystrophin lead to a progressive loss of muscle mass, increased fibrosis and ultimately fatal weakness. Elevated levels of CTGF mRNA is found by RT-PCR analysis in the muscles of DMD patients. And CTGF activity in the DMD model is positively correlated with the number of necrotic-regenerative foci and mRNA levels of fibrotic markers. TGFβ inhibition or CTGF suppression can reduce the fibrotic phenotype in the mdx mouse model. CTGF causes accumulation of ECM through ERK phosphorylation possibly via the interaction with HSPGs. Anti-CTGF treatment shows better muscle strength in isolated muscles and reduced skeletal muscle impairment, apoptotic damage, and fibrosis.
A number of ocular diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, myopia, and glaucoma are shown to be associated with aberrant CTGF expression. In diabetic retinopathy, increased CTGF contributes to the increased levels of TGFβ, retinal cell apoptosis, and the number of myofibroblasts. Synergistically with TGFβ, CTGF causes cellular changes (myofibroblastic phenotype) and ECM accumulation in myopia and glaucoma. In glaucoma, pre-treatment of human cribrosa cells with anti-CTGF antibody reduced ECM production such as fibronectin and fibrillin-1
In summary, CTGF is a central mediator of tissue remodeling and fibrosis. It could interact with protein TGFβ through VWC domain and integrin αvβ3 through CT domain to accumulate ECM and promote fibrosis. Moreover, integrins could further promote TGFβ interaction with its receptors, implying VWC domain and CT domain have a synergetic effect in fibrosis. Meanwhile, multiple positive feedback loops of CTGF-TGFβ and CTGF-integrins could enhance the fibrosis progress. CTGF could be a promising therapeutic target for fibrosis diseases. CTGF inhibition could enable organs to restore their normal wound healing response and their normal structure and function.
Inflammatory Diseases
Inflammation is a normal reaction of organs and tissues to protect themselves against a variety of toxic or pathological intrusions (e.g., bacterial infections). The inflammation enables the immune system to efficiently remove the injurious stimuli and initiate the healing process. In contrast, uncontrolled or sustained inflammation is the underlying cause of many inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA). The most common functions of CTGF in inflammatory diseases are to promote the recruitment of immune cells, the production of cytokines, and angiogenesis.
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disorder and characterized by leukocyte infiltration, neovascularization, articular cartilage destruction, and synovial membrane inflammation associated with pain and loss of joint function. Previous studies found that the expression level of CTGF was significantly increased in the fibroblasts and synovial fluid of RA patients compared with the healthy. The contribution of CTGF to the pathogenesis of RA comes from the interaction of CTGF domains with its binding proteins. CTGF can enhance pathologic proliferation of T cells and production of interleukin 17 (IL-17) in mouse models through CT domain. Apart from pro-inflammatory function, CTGF also causes articular damage by increasing osteoclastogenesis. CTGF could enhance osteoclastic function through the activation of integrin αVβ3 mediated pathways such as ERK1/2. Multiple CTGF antibodies have shown the ability to neutralize osteoclastogenesis and formation of tubular networks, which indicates that CTGF might serve as a potential therapeutic agent in the treatment of RA.
Osteoarthritis is the most prevalent joint disease and a common cause of joint pain, functional loss, and disability. The pathogenesis of OA involves the degradation of cartilage, hypertrophy, and ectopic growth of bony structures in the joints, and the inflammatory cells in the surrounding tissues. CTGF has been found to be the most abundantly expressed growth factor in chondrocytes of human patients with severe OA. CTGF is usually up-regulated in synovial fluid of OA that stimulates the production of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, which is induced by CTGF-αvβ5-JNK pathways. In vivo, deletion of CTGF increased the thickness of the articular cartilage and protected mice from OA. However, administration of recombinant CTGF into defective articular cartilage could regenerate the cartilage in the OA model. IGFBP and CT domains have been involved in chondrogenesis, which might contribute to the protective role of CTGF in OA.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the deposition of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) which triggers pro-inflammatory pathways and secrete inflammatory cytokines, and this inflammatory response can become toxic and harmful to neuronal cells. Elevated CTGF expression is observed in brain neurons and astrocytes from AD patients, and its expression level positively correlates with the progression of clinical dementia. CTGF could facilitate the production of cytokines and chemokines by astrocytes and enhance the recruitment of immune cells such as mononuclear cells, leading to locally augmented immune response. CTGF also plays important roles in other brain diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, brain injury, glioblastoma, and cerebral infarction. However, the underlying mechanisms of CTGF in brain disorders remains unclear.
In inflammatory disorders, CTGF exerts pro-inflammatory functions mostly via interaction with integrin αvβ3 and αvβ5, in which CT domain might be responsible for this function.
Current Therapeutic Strategy Targeting CTGF
Connective tissue growth factor is considered as a therapeutic target to combat cancer, fibrosis and other related disorders in a variety of organs, and tissues. There are many approaches such as antibodies, synthetic peptides, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), targeting CTGF to exert therapeutic effect (Table 4).
Antibodies and Peptides
Humanized monoclonal antibodies are particularly well suited as blocking agents for CTGF activities and thus hold promise as potential therapeutics. Currently, multiple antibodies targeting different domains of CTGF have been studied. FG-3019 (pamrevlumab), the most widely studied antibody, is a fully human recombinant DNA-derived CTGF-targeted monoclonal antibody. FG-3019 targets VWC domain of CTGF and directly against the sequence (Cys142–Gly157) that is not conserved between CCN family members. FG-3019 could reduce fibrosis in the liver, pancreas, lung, and skeletal muscles and block the progression of tumors including mesothelioma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ovarian cancer, melanoma and pancreatic cancer in animal studies. FG-3019 has been granted Orphan Drug Designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in several diseases such as IPF and DMD. FG-3019 researches have been in phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of IPF and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC), and in phase 2 clinical trial for the treatment of DMD and acute COVID-19 disease, respectively. The proportion of IPF patients with disease progression is significantly lower in the FG-3019 group than in the placebo group (10.0 vs. 31.4%), and FG-3019 demonstrates a safety profile similar to that of placebo. There have been other antibodies in the pre-clinical stage such as FG-3149 and three self-developed antibodies which target VWC, CT, TSP1, and VWC domain of CTGF, respectively, and have shown anti-fibrosis effects.
It has been reported that CTGF could be inhibited by other CCN family members such as CCN3, and CCN3 could be a potential anti-fibrotic treatment. Although the exact mechanism of CTGF inhibition by CCN3 is unclear, two modified synthetic peptides derived from CCN3 (BLR-100 and BLR-200) have shown a promising inhibitory effect on CTGF expression and are evaluated in pre-clinical studies. BLR-100 and BLR-200 could reduce tumor angiogenesis, fibrosis, and necrosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) model, which alters the tumor microenvironment and increases the tumor response to chemotherapy.
siRNAs and ASOs
The other strategies, siRNAs and ASOs, which have a high specificity to the target gene, have also been used in CTGF-targeted therapies. RXI-109 is a new class of stable, CTGF-targeted, self-delivering siRNA. Intradermal injection of the RXI-109 results in robust, dose-dependent, long-lasting reduction of CTGF in a rodent model of dermal wound healing. Silencing of CTGF also impacts both fibrotic markers, myofibroblast differentiation, and collagen deposition. A phase 2 clinical study was conducted with RXI-109 to evaluate its impact on the reduction of hypertrophic scar formation after scar revision surgery. The study successfully meets the primary effectiveness objective with statistically significant outcomes for improved visual appearance for RXI-109 treated scar over control. RXI-109 also meets the secondary objective as it is shown to be safe and well tolerated. Another two siRNA drugs, OLX-101 aim at hypertrophic scar is currently under phase I clinical trial. OLX-201 aims at IPF is being evaluated in pre-clinical studies.
An antisense oligonucleotide (EXC-001) has been developed to inhibit CTGF production and reduce CTGF-driven collagen deposition and scar formation. The mechanism of EXC-001 action is to bind to CTGF mRNA and inhibit the expression of CTGF protein. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study, significant reductions in scar severity were observed following treatment with EXC-001. EXC-001 was well tolerated, with no serious adverse effects and no changes in laboratory parameters considered related to the study drug.
Current therapeutic strategies targeting CTGF mentioned above have shown moderate to promising results in different diseases. However, there still have some concerns for these strategies. Firstly, anti-CTGF monoclonal antibodies are likely to be rapidly cleared and therefore need to be administered at higher doses and/or more frequently. Secondly, the higher rate of infection was observed in FG-3019 group compared to the placebo group (respiratory tract infection: 30% vs. 21%; Urinary tract infection: 20% vs. 8%), which might suggest that anti-CTGF antibodies have a negative effect on the immune system. Thirdly, anti-CTGF antibodies may exert negative effects on skeletal development since treatment with CTGF antibodies inhibited chondrogenesis in vitro. In terms of siRNAs and ASOs, there are some limitations including: (i) low specificity that can lead to toxicities, (ii) poor cellular delivery as a result of difficulties in biological membrane crossing. Although they have shown promising results in anti-scarring, more investigations are needed to test the therapeutic promise in tumors and severe fibrotic disorders such as IPF.
Structural Elements for CTGF-Targeted Therapies
Through the interaction of CTGF domains with a variety of proteins, the deregulation of CTGF expression or activity contributes to the pathobiology of various diseases including cancers, fibrotic disorders, and inflammatory diseases. In cancers and fibrotic disorders, both CT domain and VWC domain contribute to the development of diseases, and these two domains may have a synergic role. For example, tumor migration can be activated by the EMT process from the binding between VWC domain with TGFβ, and the angiogenesis from the binding between of CT domain with integrin αvβ3. Moreover, both interactions of CTGF(VWC)-TGFβ and CTGF(CT)-αvβ3 contribute to the ECM accumulation in fibrotic disorders. Multiple domains should be taken into consideration for the maximizing the anti-fibrosis or anti-tumor effects. The targeting sequence needs to be carefully selected since the interaction of CT domain and LRP6 contributes to skeletal development. CTGF shares an identity of 30–50% in amino acid sequence with other CCN family proteins which have demonstrated critical biological functions. The drugs targeting CTGF should not interfere with the function of other CCN family members, therefore, the less conserved motif in CTGF is a better choice for drug discovery.
New Technology for Drug Discovery Targeting CTGF
Although antibodies are now established as a key therapeutic modality for a range of diseases, their limited stability, complicated in vivo production, and typically undefined cross-reactivity are challenges to overcome. Aptamers are short (20–70 bases) single stranded oligonucleotides that bind to their targets through 3D conformational complementarities with high affinity and specificity. The aptamer-based drug ‘Macugen’ was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2004 for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration and a series of aptamer-based drugs are in clinical pipelines. Aptamers are considered to be strong chemical rivals of antibodies due to their inherent advantages over antibodies. Compared to antibodies: (i) aptamers can be produced using cell-free chemical synthesis and are therefore less expensive to manufacture, (ii) aptamers exhibit extremely low variability between batches and have better controlled post-production modification, (iii) aptamers are minimally immunogenic, (iv) aptamers are more stable at room temperature and longer shelf life, and (v) aptamers are small in size and could bind to regions which are inaccessible to antibodies. Moreover, aptamers could specifically target a specific protein from family proteins with highly similar structures.
In summary, CTGF has four domains that interact with a variety of proteins such as growth factors, integrins, and matrix proteins. These interactions affect multiple signaling pathways and make CTGF a key regulator and potential therapeutic target in fibrotic, inflammatory diseases, and cancers. A variety of CTGF antagonistic strategies have been developed in numerous experimental systems to reverse these diseases. Novel CTGF-targeted therapeutic strategies, such as aptamer-based CTGF-targeted strategies, are desired for the treatment of these diseases.
Author Contributions
ZC did the literature research and wrote the manuscript. NZ, HC, and YY helped in polishing the manuscript. Z-KZ, GZ, and B-TZ revised and approved the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References 193
- 1.
Abreu J. G. Ketpura N. I. Reversade B. De Robertis E. M. (2002 ). Connective-tissue growth factor (Ctgf) modulates cell signalling by Bmp and Tgf-beta. Nat. Cell Biol. 4 599–604.
Not in our library10.1038/ncb826
- 2.
Adhikari B. Cheng J. (2017 ). Improved protein structure reconstruction using secondary structures, contacts at higher distance thresholds, and non-contacts. BMC Bioinform. 18:380.
Not in our library10.1186/s12859-017-1807-5
- 3.
- 4.
Allen J. T. Spiteri M. A. (2002 ). Growth factors in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: relative roles. Respir. Res. 3:13.
Not in our library10.1186/rr162
- 5.
Alvarez H. Corvalan A. Roa J. C. Argani P. Murillo F. Edwards J. (2008 ). Serial analysis of gene expression identifies connective tissue growth factor expression as a prognostic biomarker in gallbladder cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 14 2631–2638.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1991
- 6.
Angelini A. Li Z. Mericskay M. Decaux J. F. (2015 ). Regulation of connective tissue growth factor and cardiac fibrosis by an SRF/MicroRNA-133a Axis. PLoS One. 10:e139858.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0139858
- 7.
Anna R. M. Ewa L. Jacek J. (2015 ). Matricellular proteins of the Cyr61/CTGF/NOV (CCN) family and the nervous system. Front. Cell Neurosci. 9:237.
Not in our library10.3389/fncel.2015.00237
- 8.
Arnott J. A. Lambi A. G. Mundy C. Hendesi H. Pixley R. A. Owen T. A. (2011 ). The role of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) in skeletogenesis. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 21 43–69.
Not in our library10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v21.i1.40
- 9.
Babic A. M. Chen C. C. Lau L. F. (1999 ). Fisp12/mouse connective tissue growth factor mediates endothelial cell adhesion and migration through integrin alphavbeta3, promotes endothelial cell survival, and induces angiogenesis in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 19 2958–2966.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.19.4.2958
- 10.
Baguma-Nibasheka M. Kablar B. (2008 ). Pulmonary hypoplasia in the connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf) null mouse. Dev. Dyn. 237 485–493.
Not in our library10.1002/dvdy.21433
- 11.
Barbe M. F. Hilliard B. A. Amin M. Harris M. Y. Hobson L. J. Cruz G. E. (2020 ). Blocking CTGF/CCN2 reverses neural fibrosis and sensorimotor declines in a rat model of overuse-induced median mononeuropathy. J. Orthop. Res. [Epub ahead of print].
Not in our library10.1002/jor.24709
- 12.
Barefoot L. Survi M. Cardia J. Bulock K. Dispersyn G. (2018 ). 496 RXI-109 treatment to reduce the formation of hypertrophic dermal scars. J. Invest. Dermatol. 138:S84.
Not in our library
- 13.
- 14.
Bennewith K. L. Huang X. Ham C. M. Graves E. E. Erler J. T. Kambham N. (2009 ). The role of tumor cell-derived connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) in pancreatic tumor growth. Cancer Res. 69 775–784.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0987
- 15.
Boes M. Dake B. L. Booth B. A. Erondu N. E. Oh Y. Hwa V. (1999 ). Connective tissue growth factor (IGFBP-rP2) expression and regulation in cultured bovine endothelial cells. Endocrinology 140 1575–1580.
Not in our library10.1210/endo.140.4.6633
- 16.
Bork P. (1993 ). The modular architecture of a new family of growth regulators related to connective tissue growth factor. Febs Lett. 327 125–130.
Not in our library10.1016/0014-5793(93)80155-n
- 17.
Bradham D. M. Igarashi A. Potter R. L. Grotendorst G. R. (1991 ). Connective tissue growth factor: a cysteine-rich mitogen secreted by human vascular endothelial cells is related to the SRC-induced immediate early gene product CEF-10. J Cell Biol. 114 1285–1294.
Not in our library10.1083/jcb.114.6.1285
- 18.
Braig S. Wallner S. Junglas B. Fuchshofer R. Bosserhoff A. K. (2011 ). CTGF is overexpressed in malignant melanoma and promotes cell invasion and migration. Br. J. Cancer. 105 231–238.
Not in our library10.1038/bjc.2011.226
- 19.
Brenner M. C. Krzyzanski W. Chou J. Z. Signore P. E. Fung C. K. Guzman D. (2016 ). FG-3019, a human monoclonal antibody recognizing connective tissue growth factor, is subject to target-mediated drug disposition. Pharm. Res. 33 1833–1849.
Not in our library10.1007/s11095-016-1918-0
- 20.
Brigstock D. R. (1999 ). The connective tissue growth factor/cysteine-rich 61/nephroblastoma overexpressed (CCN) family. Endocr. Rev. 20 189–206.
Not in our library10.1210/edrv.20.2.0360
- 21.
Brigstock D. R. (2010 ). Connective tissue growth factor (CCN2, CTGF) and organ fibrosis: lessons from transgenic animals. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 4 1–4.
Not in our library10.1007/s12079-009-0071-5
- 22.
Byrne M. Tzekov R. Wang Y. Rodgers A. Cardia J. Ford G. (2013 ). Novel hydrophobically modified asymmetric RNAi compounds (sd-rxRNA) demonstrate robust efficacy in the eye. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 29 855–864.
Not in our library10.1089/jop.2013.0148
- 23.
Chang C. C. Lin M. T. Lin B. R. Jeng Y. M. Chen S. T. Chu C. Y. (2006 ). Effect of connective tissue growth factor on hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha degradation and tumor angiogenesis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 98 984–995.
Not in our library10.1093/jnci/djj242
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
Chery J. (2016 ). RNA therapeutics: RNAi and antisense mechanisms and clinical applications. Postdoc J. 4 35–50.
Not in our library10.14304/surya.jpr.v4n7.5
- 27.
Chien W. Yin D. Gui D. Mori A. Frank J. M. Said J. (2006 ). Suppression of cell proliferation and signaling transduction by connective tissue growth factor in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 4 591–598.
Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-06-0029
- 28.
Chintalapudi M. R. Markiewicz M. Kose N. Dammai V. Champion K. J. Hoda R. S. (2008 ). Cyr61/CCN1 and CTGF/CCN2 mediate the proangiogenic activity of VHL-mutant renal carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis 29 696–703.
Not in our library10.1093/carcin/bgn019
- 29.
Croci S. Landuzzi L. Astolfi A. Nicoletti G. Rosolen A. Sartori F. (2004 ). Inhibition of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) expression decreases the survival and myogenic differentiation of human rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Cancer Res. 64 1730–1736.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-3502-02
- 30.
Cui L. Zhang Q. Mao Z. Chen J. Wang X. Qu J. (2011 ). CTGF is overexpressed in papillary thyroid carcinoma and promotes the growth of papillary thyroid cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 32 721–728.
Not in our library10.1007/s13277-011-0173-6
- 31.
De Sousa Lopes S. M. C. Feijen A. Korving J. Korchynskyi O. Larsson J. Karlsson S. (2004 ). Connective tissue growth factor expression and Smad signaling during mouse heart development and myocardial infarction. Dev. Dyn. 231 542–550.
Not in our library10.1002/dvdy.20162
- 32.
Delpino M. V. Quarleri J. (2020 ). SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis: imbalance in the renin-angiotensin system favors lung fibrosis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 10:340.
Not in our library10.3389/fcimb.2020.00340
- 33.
Deng Y. Z. Chen P. P. Wang Y. Yin D. Koeffler H. P. Li B. (2007 ). Connective tissue growth factor is overexpressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and promotes tumorigenicity through beta-catenin-T-cell factor/Lef signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 282 36571–36581.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m704141200
- 34.
Dorn L. E. Petrosino J. M. Wright P. Accornero F. (2018 ). CTGF/CCN2 is an autocrine regulator of cardiac fibrosis. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 121 205–211.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.07.130
- 35.
Dornhofer N. Spong S. Bennewith K. Salim A. Klaus S. Kambham N. (2006 ). Connective tissue growth factor-specific monoclonal antibody therapy inhibits pancreatic tumor growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 66 5816–5827.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0081
- 36.
Ercan E. Han J. M. Di Nardo A. Winden K. Han M. J. Hoyo L. (2017 ). Neuronal CTGF/CCN2 negatively regulates myelination in a mouse model of tuberous sclerosis complex. J. Exp. Med. 214 681–697.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20160446
- 37.
Falke L. L. Kinashi H. Dendooven A. Broekhuizen R. Stoop R. Joles J. A. (2016 ). Age-dependent shifts in renal response to injury relate to altered BMP6/CTGF expression and signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 311 F926–F934.
Not in our library10.1152/ajprenal.00324.2016
- 38.
Frost G. R. Jonas L. A. Li Y. M. (2019 ). Friend, foe or both? immune activity in alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 11:337.
Not in our library10.3389/fnagi.2019.00337
- 39.
Ganugapati J. Akash S. (2017 ). Multi-template homology based structure prediction and molecular docking studies of protein ‘L’ of Zaire ebolavirus (EBOV). Inform. Med. Unlocked. 9 68–75.
Not in our library10.1016/j.imu.2017.06.002
- 40.
Gao R. Brigstock D. R. (2003 ). Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) is a heparin-dependent adhesion receptor for connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) in rat activated hepatic stellate cells. Hepatol. Res. 27 214–220.
Not in our library10.1016/s1386-6346(03)00241-9
Cited by papers we hold 1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.