Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Senescence in Wound Repair: Emerging Strategies to Target Chronic Healing Wounds

Holly N. Wilkinson, Matthew J. Hardman

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · 2020 · Review

doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00773

Abstract

Cellular senescence is a fundamental stress response that restrains tumour formation. Yet, senescence cells are also present in non-cancerous states, accumulating exponentially with chronological age and contributing to age- and diabetes-related cellular dysfunction. The identification of hypersecretory and phagocytic behaviours in cells that were once believed to be non-functional has led to a recent explosion of senescence research. Here we discuss the profound, and often opposing, roles identified for short-lived vs. chronic tissue senescence. Transiently induced senescence is required for development, regeneration and acute wound repair, while chronic senescence is widely implicated in tissue pathology. We recently demonstrated that sustained senescence contributes to impaired diabetic healing via the CXCR2 receptor, which when blocked promotes repair. Further studies have highlighted the beneficial effects of targeting a range of senescence-linked processes to fight disease. Collectively, these findings hold promise for developing clinically viable strategies to tackle senescence in chronic wounds and other cutaneous pathologies.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Senescence, a seminal discovery of, is a defined process that globally regulates cell fate. Cellular senescence is traditionally described as a terminal stress response, whereby cells are triggered to undergo stable and essentially irreversible cell cycle arrest following initiation by a diverse range of stress-inducing stimuli. Indeed, this process acts as an autonomous anti-tumour mechanism, halting incipient neoplastic transformation. Yet, senescent cells can be found in non-cancerous tissues, accumulating exponentially with increasing chronological age. These non-proliferative cells retain metabolic capabilities, exhibiting a hypersecretory phenotype. It has recently been shown that some senescent cells may even engulf their neighbouring cells, for a survival advantage. These profound functional behaviours, identified in cells long thought to be non-functional, pose new questions around their tissue roles and consequences. This review will explore emerging roles for cellular senescence in normal and pathological wound repair, highlighting areas of potential therapeutic opportunity.

Senescence as an Anti-Proliferation Mechanism

It was originally thought that only mitotic cells, which may be highly proliferative, or spend large periods of time in quiescence, undergo senescence. This view has since been challenged, as features of senescence are observed in some differentiated cells. The major age- and stress-related processes that induce cellular senescence include replicative exhaustion, mitogenic signals, oxidative stress, DNA breaks, and epigenomic damage. These stressors subsequently initiate anti-tumourigenic networks, controlled by transcriptional regulators such as p53. p53 directly transactivates the cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, p21, to inhibit CDK2, CDK4, and CDK6-mediated retinoblastoma protein (pRb) phosphorylation. p16 similarly prevents pRb inactivation, but in a p53-independent manner. pRb naturally binds E2F/DP transcription factor complexes to block transcription of E2F target genes, thus failure to phosphorylate pRb halts cell cycle progression from the G1 to S phase.

It is important to note that, while simplified here, the role for p53 in cell survival is complex and somewhat contradictory, as p53 activation can actually suppress senescence, instead causing cell quiescence or apoptosis (reviewed in ). In this regard, a cell’s fate might be decided by the amount of damage sustained, and the expression of other senescence-linked factors. Molecular understanding of senescence is complicated further by the fact that the relative contribution of p21, p16, and other cell cycle regulators is thought to be context dependent.

Senescent Cell Characteristics

Morphologically, senescent cells exhibit flattened, elongated features, and may have multiple nuclei and enlarged vacuoles. Senescence-associated beta galactosidase is often used as an archetypal senescence biomarker, yet its specificity has come under criticism. For that reason, it is most often used in conjunction with other key biomarkers, such as p16 and p21, to confirm senescence.

Senescent cells may also possess regions of highly condensed chromatin (senescence-associated heterochromatic foci; ) and DNA damage-induced chromatin alterations, including γH2AX and H3K9Me3. Loss of histones, centrosome aberrations and the breakdown of the nuclear envelope (e.g., degradation of lamin B1) similarly occur in many senescent states to enable rearrangement of heterochromatin. These chromatin modifications sequester E2F target genes to potentiate senescence. Moreover, senescence is reinforced by microRNA-mediated silencing of E2F target genes.

Experimental manipulation of epigenetic marks has demonstrably shown their importance in controlling the molecular induction of cellular senescence. H3K27me3, for example, represses p16 and p14 expression by silencing the INK4a-ARF locus. Removal of H3K27me3, by JMJD3-induced demethylation or pharmacological inhibition of the histone lysine methyltransferase, EZH2, promotes p16 expression and senescence. Inhibition of EZH2 also leads to SASP production via enrichment of H3K27ac, and loss of H3K27me3, at SASP-related loci. Overexpression of another histone demethylase, UTX, can also silence H3K27me3 to promote cellular senescence.

Stressed cells are repressed at the transcriptional level to prevent the expansion of potentially harmful mutations. It is therefore understandable that regulators, such as p53, are not only responsible for initiating senescence, but also decide whether cells should instead enter temporary quiescence or undergo apoptosis. Intriguingly, senescent cells may actually retain heightened resistance to apoptosis, first demonstrated in fibroblasts, possibly due to altered p53 signalling and upregulation of pro-survival pathways (e.g., BCL-2 and ephrins, ). Indeed, senescent keratinocytes are resistant to ultraviolet radiation-induced apoptosis and senescent fibroblasts to thapsigargin-induced apoptosis. Senescent endothelial cells, on the other hand, are more likely to undergo apoptosis than their non-senescent counterparts. Clearly, this senescence trait is situational, and not ubiquitous to all cell types.

The hypersecretory phenotype of senescent cells is most often referred to as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), an attribute closely linked to the positive or negative outcomes of tissue senescence that appears to be cell-type and context-dependent. Even though studies have characterised the SASP in multiple cell types, its detailed composition remains elusive. Broadly, the SASP comprises a collection of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, growth factors, proteases, lipids and extracellular matrix components. It is thought to mainly be a feature of senescent cells that have undergone a DNA damage response, as a SASP is not apparent in cells that naturally senesce due to overexpression of p16 and p21. However, a DNA damage-independent SASP can occur in fibroblasts via p38MAPK phosphorylation, challenging previous preconceptions. Collectively, the secretome is the characteristic of senescent cells that confers most of their biological effects, significantly contributing to age-related functional decline and chronic disease in autocrine and paracrine manners.

The SASP is dynamically regulated by a number of factors that mostly converge on the NF-κB complex. Inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1α, can form positive feedback loops with NF-κB and partner cascades to reinforce SASP release and senescence. In fact, multiple authors have demonstrated activation of NF-κB gene sets following senescence, while p53 and NF-κB are linked in coregulatory (in macrophages, ) and antagonistic (HeLa cells, ) manners. The importance of NF-κB in senescence is highlighted by studies where NF-κB suppression allows oncogene-induced IMR-90 fibroblasts to bypass senescence and reduces senescence in osteoarthritic cartilage.

Indeed, the SASP (e.g., TGFβ) can potentiate senescence in neighbouring cells, but also promote senescent cell clearance by attracting immune cells. The induction of senescence in, and clearance of, premalignant cells consequently reinforces tumour suppression. Paradoxically, the SASP can also drive pre-cancerous development in proximal tissues as many SASP proteins are potent mitogenic factors (e.g., VEGF,,; ). The plasticity of the SASP across different microenvironments, cell types and stimuli further complicates our understanding of its role within tissues. However, it is clear that senescence, and the SASP, remain important regulators of normal physiology and pathology. Tissue consequences of senescent cells and their SASP are summarised in Figure 1.

Roles for Senescence During Development and Regeneration

Many crucial biological processes require cells to undergo cell cycle arrest and differentiation to terminal states. For example, developmental lineage-specification requires cells to differentiate in a temporospatial manner in order to properly form tissues. In the skin, basal keratinocytes first proliferate, and then differentiate, transiting through the epidermis to replenish the non-viable stratum corneum. In fact, to allow effective keratinocyte differentiation, p21 is activated initially, but then suppressed. It is therefore unsurprising that tumour suppressor genes also aid development and regeneration through control of quiescence, terminal differentiation, apoptosis and senescence (e.g.,; ).

Three main roles have been put forward for the presence of senescent cells during embryogenesis: (1) to promote the regression of transient structures; (2) to balance cell populations and/or; (3) to act as a signalling hub to regulate tissue morphogenesis. In embryonic development, temporal induction of senescence is required for tissue patterning in the developing limb bud. Here, p21 induction leads to SASP factor expression (e.g., FGF), stimulating cell proliferation and tissue formation. Resulting senescent (and apoptotic) cells are then effectively cleared by macrophages, prior to tissue remodelling. Indeed, genetic knockdown of p21 to attenuate senescence leads to mild patterning defects in murine limbs. In a corroborating study, p21 was shown to contribute to senescence-linked development in a p53-independent manner in human and murine embryos. In this case, however, loss of p21 was compensated for by increased apoptosis. Thus, p21-regulated senescence and apoptosis can perform synergistic roles during organismal development.

Akin to development, lower organisms and anamniotes are able to regenerate their tissues to full form and function, either as juveniles or throughout their lives. In fact, it has recently been shown that senescence may play an important role in these regenerative processes. In salamanders, senescence induction occurs at the intermediate stages of limb regeneration and then diminishes due to effective clearance by macrophages. Senescence is similarly invoked during pectoral fin regeneration in zebrafish, and impaired when senescence is blocked with the senolytic compound, ABT-263. Given the importance of senescence in regulating tissue formation throughout development and regeneration, it is logical to ask whether senescence could play a role in the reparative responses of higher vertebrates.

Senescence in Normal Tissue Repair

Tissue repair is necessary for all life. While it seldom leads to full regeneration, the process prevents exsanguination and infection, and aids structural and functional restoration required for survival. Tissue repair is rapid and highly dynamic, comprising multiple cell types and overlapping processes that broadly include haemastasis, inflammation, cell proliferation and dermal remodelling. During haemastasis, an insoluble blood clot is formed and endothelial cells from damaged vasculature enter the wound, depositing a temporary fibrin scaffold and releasing factors to attract both circulating immune cells and resident skin cells. Inflammatory cells are rapidly recruited to the site of damage, first dominated by neutrophils and pro-inflammatory macrophages to remove bacteria and necrotic tissue. Later stage healing is characterised by a switch to anti-inflammatory macrophages, which phagocytose any remaining pro-inflammatory cells, supporting fibroplasia and wound resolution. To allow effective repair, keratinocytes undergo partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and begin migrating to close the wound gap, a process known as re-epithelialisation. Formation of new vasculature (angiogenesis) is essential to provide sustenance during the highly proliferative stage of healing. Finally, the immature matrix laid down during early healing is replaced by stronger scaffold proteins, such as mature collagen fibres produced and remodelled by fibroblasts. Each stage of wound repair involves extensive cellular communication, orchestrated by cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and components of the extracellular milieu. The plasticity of the response, and the cellular behaviours that occur, are homologous to those observed in cancer (e.g., immune cell infiltration, invasion and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, ). It is therefore not unreasonable to suggest that senescence, and associated mechanisms, could significantly contribute to wound healing.

Indeed, pertinent roles for senescence in tissue injury have been emerging, largely focusing on the beneficial, transient initiation of senescence during repair. Here, induction of senescence following liver damage and cutaneous injury was shown to prevent excessive fibrosis that would otherwise cause tissue dysfunction. confirmed that reduced fibrosis was the result of senescence-linked fibrolytic enzyme production, and immune-regulated clearance of injury-expanded cell populations that would otherwise contribute to excessive matrix deposition. Likewise, senescence decreased fibrosis in a model of cardiac injury, where genetic ablation of p53 and p16 accelerated fibrosis. Ectopic expression of Ccn1, which increased cardiac senescence, also limited fibrosis in this model. Interestingly,, the first authors to observe transient senescence during skin repair, revealed that Ccn1 causes fibroblast senescence via an oxidative-stress dependent mechanism. Upregulation of Ccn1 was vitally important to prevent excessive fibrosis. More recently, the same authors demonstrated that topical application of another Ccn family member, Ccn2, similarly actuates senescence and reduces fibrosis in cutaneous murine wounds.

By contrast, when ablated p16- and p21-expressing cells in mice they observed impaired extracellular matrix deposition and a decreased rate of wound closure. Intriguingly, by day 15 post-injury, these senescent-deficient wounds were excessively fibrotic. Similar to previous research, transient senescence appeared limited to fibroblast-like cells, which produced a PDGFA-enriched SASP to stimulate appropriate skin repair. Studies continue to explore the importance of transient senescence during acute wound healing, with recently reporting that overexpression of nrf2 promotes fibroblast senescence, which is accompanied by accelerated wound re-epithelialisation and extracellular matrix deposition. Although at present limited to murine models, these key investigations provide clear evidence that temporal induction of senescence is necessary for effective skin repair. Yet, many questions remain unanswered. For instance, does transient wound-induced senescence arise through intrinsic cell factors or environmental influences? And how are these senescent cells so effectively cleared once they are no longer required?

Senescence in Aged and Diabetic Wound Healing

The above studies provide substantial insight into the importance of senescence for the healing of experimental wounds. What they do not address is the potential differential influences of acute vs. chronic senescence to tissue repair, nor how senescence could be involved in pathological healing. These are important considerations for the clinical setting, where effective healing can mean the difference between life or death. Chronic, non-healing wounds are a huge socioeconomic burden, reducing quality of life and costing billions each year to treat. Considered a “silent epidemic”, chronic wounds display diverse aetiology, with incomplete molecular and cellular understanding. Inadequate current treatments mean it is fundamentally important to further understand why chronic wounds fail to heal, and ultimately develop more effective therapies.

It has long been appreciated that chronic wound pathology is almost entirely restricted to those who are elderly and/or diabetic. This is fascinating, as the biological processes of ageing and diabetes are themselves notably linked to senescence. Senescence is both a characteristic feature of,, and and contributor to, widespread tissue ageing. Epigenetic modifications are one feature of ageing that is linked to senescence. Genomic instability and DNA methylation changes correlate with chronological ageing in mice and humans. Interestingly, the repressive mark, H3K27me3, showed altered DNA coverage on aged vs. young stem cells, which may contribute to their reduced renewal capacity.

Another attribute of normal metabolic ageing that is experimentally linked to senescence is cumulative oxidative damage. For example, human diploid fibroblasts and endothelial cells undergo senescence in the presence of heightened reactive oxygen species (ROS), while replicative lifespan can be extended in cell culture by lowering oxygen tension. More notably, exposure to ultraviolet radiation simulates photoageing by increasing ROS production in skin, while ROS upregulates p16 in skin cells. Skin ageing is also characterised by cell accumulation of p16 and senescence-associated beta galactosidase. This association is causally corroborated by, who demonstrated that transplantation of senescent cells to young mice accelerated ageing, while revealed that eradication of p16-positive cells alleviated features of premature ageing in a murine progeroid model.

The link between diabetes and senescence is less well-established, but is an area of intense current research. As previously mentioned, senescent cells cause widespread disruption to normal tissue architecture by virtue of their SASP. Major SASP constituents influence senescence by targeting immunological pathways, such as NF-κB. This leads to matrix proteolysis and increased inflammation, primary features of aged and diabetic wounds. Indeed, growing evidence suggests that a heightened intrinsic immune response, or “sterile” inflammation, contributes to age- and diabetes-related pathology (reviewed in ). Characteristic features of diabetes that drive immune cell accumulation, and therefore potentiate senescence, include obesity and hyperglycaemia. These processes most likely promote senescence via increasing advanced glycation end-products and causing widespread oxidative damage.

Turning specifically to the skin, it is clear that in diabetic and aged tissue, accumulation of senescent cells extends to both uninjured skin and wounds. Previous authors have demonstrated that chronic venous leg ulcers harbour senescent fibroblasts. The presence of senescent fibroblasts in chronic wounds may even exacerbate pathology, where it was shown that ulcers containing over 15% senescent cells were hard to heal. We recently reported a novel mechanistic link between senescence and healing in diabetic wounds. Here, intrinsically senescent macrophages were observed to promote impaired wound healing in a non-aged, murine model of diabetic pathological repair.

Indeed, many SASP factors attract monocytes and macrophages (e.g., MCP-1;;; ), often with a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Excessive immune cell recruitment and inappropriate retention is a hallmark of chronic wound pathology. This may be even be exacerbated by other local factors, such as iron, which induces a pro-inflammatory phenotype in macrophages and leads to fibroblast senescence in chronic venous leg ulcers. Thus, macrophages are likely a nexus for uncontrolled local inflammation in both diabetic pathogenesis and senescence, ultimately delivering poor wound healing. Moreover, the impaired function of macrophages (and other immune cell types) in aged and diabetic wounds likely contributes to prolonged, rather than transient, senescence due to ineffective clearance mechanisms.

Senescence in the wound environment is probably not limited to fibroblasts and macrophages, as other wound cells, including keratinocytes and endothelial cells, are capable of undergoing senescence in response to environment cues. Senescent keratinocytes are certainly observed in aged skin and are suggested to influence the reduced regenerative capacity of aged epidermis. Chronic wounds also harbour pathogenic microorganisms that may contribute to senescence by stimulating ROS production in keratinocytes and exacerbating inflammation. Indeed, this may occur via specific bacterial virulence factors, as pyocyanin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa can induce senescence in fibroblasts.

It is clear that the chronic ulcer milieu, which is rich in pro-inflammatory factors, indirectly causes senescence via exacerbating inflammation. However, as wound fluid from venous leg ulcers directly induces senescence in neonatal fibroblasts, it is likely that the local microenvironment also stimulates cellular senescence. Intrinsically senescent wounds cells, such as fibroblasts, are similarly capable of potentiating senescence across neighbouring cell types in a paracrine manner, via their SASP. Moreover, in local environments where the SASP is insufficient to directly induce cellular senescence, it may still promote pathological cellular phenotypes, such as epidermal hyperproliferation and excessive dermal proteolysis (via MMPs; ).

To add a further level of complexity, evidence for the disparities between transient and chronic senescence is beginning to emerge, with clear implications for wound healing. For instance, stemness and reprogramming in keratinocytes is promoted by a transient SASP, yet inhibited when the SASP becomes chronic. Transient senescence also encourages matrix deposition following tissue injury, but prevents excessive fibrosis, while chronic senescence is linked fibrotic disease. Taken together, published and emerging studies are certainly challenging the dogma that senescence is primarily limited to age-related dysfunction and cancer. Indeed, evolving understanding of the concept of transient vs. chronic senescence is likely to deliver important new insight into the processes that occur during acute and pathological repair. Current understanding of senescence contribution to normal and pathological wound healing is summarised in Figure 2.

Cellular Senescence as a Therapeutic Target in Pathological Wounds

The widespread causative biological effects of cellular senescence in tissue ageing pathology make the therapeutic modulation of senescence an attractive target for a plethora of age-related diseases. Genetic studies positively support this idea, with inducible knockdown of p16 alleviating hallmark features of ageing in progeroid murine models. In fact, the well-documented effects of caloric restriction, which both extends mammalian lifespan and delays the onset of age-related disease, may be a physical manifestation of tissue senescence modulation. Caloric restriction has been shown to reduce cardiac senescence, and senescence in hepatocytes and intestinal crypt cells in vivo. At the epigenetic level, caloric restriction protects against age-related changes in DNA methylation. Caloric restriction also decreases senescence partly by upregulating the epigenetically linked sirtuin pathway, promoting anti-apoptosis and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Subsequent effects include slowing metabolic processes that contribute to cellular ageing (e.g., oxidative stress, ), increasing antioxidant production, and increasing autophagy to remove damaged and unimportant intracellular components (reviewed in ). Moreover, sirtuins may play important roles in preventing age-related decline in skin repair, as SIRT1 deficiency exacerbates healing pathology in diabetic wounds.

Although caloric restriction (without malnutrition) provides a multitude of health benefits, it retains poor feasibility as a clinical intervention, requiring high compliance and patient discipline. Many lifestyle choices, such as obesity, are actually strongly associated with social status. Similarly, those suffering from uncontrolled type II diabetes and severe chronic wounds are often from socially deprived backgrounds, a difficult population in which to manage compliance. For all of these reasons, a considerably more attractive proposition is the use of senescence-targeted drugs, otherwise known as senolytics. These drugs affect unique features of senescent cells, such as resistance to apoptosis. Senescent cells upregulate prosurvival pathways, particularly BCL-2. This opens up drug repurposing opportunities around the numerous BCL-2 inhibitors that were developed for the treatment of cancer. Results have been promising. Targeting BCL-2 in vivo induces apoptosis and thus eliminates senescent cells in the lung following irradiation and throughout the body following irradiation or natural ageing. further established that senescent human and murine fibroblasts, and human renal epithelial cells, are more susceptible to BCL-2 inhibitor (ABT-263) than non-senescent cells, proposing potent and specific effects. Unfortunately, traditional BCL-2 inhibitors possess activity against other BCL class proteins, such as BCL-XL, raising questions around off-target effects in the clinic, including thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. As a result, more specific BCL-2 inhibitors with lower toxicity are being tested. It has even been suggested that low-dose, combinatorial use of senolytics may be an effective and less harmful alternative.

Other senolytics that have demonstrated experimental efficacy include the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Dasatinib, used to treat leukaemia, and the flavonoid p53 activator, Quercetin. Combinatorial treatment with Dasatinib and Quercetin extends lifespan, alleviates frailty, and improves vasomotor function in aged mice. Dasatinib and Quercetin have also shown promise in a phase I trial in diabetic kidney disease patients, where reduced senescent cells and circulating SASP factors were observed following administration. Alternative flavonoids are now being tested for their potential senolytic effects, such as Fisetin, which is able to eliminate senescent cells and, crucially, restore tissue function in aged mice.

The importance of transient senescence for effective healing should not be underestimated. As noted previously, temporary induction of senescence aids rapid tissue reformation. During a normal damage response, these senescent cells are effectively cleared by natural killer cells and macrophages. Nevertheless, in chronic situations, senescent cells persist, likely due to elevated immunosenescence and resulting impaired immunological functions. It follows that treatments to boost immune system function, for instance by aiding senescent cell recognition, could be beneficial in the context of transient senescence and tissue repair. Generally, senescent cells express stimulatory ligands that bind to NK2GD receptors on natural killer cells, thus initiating a killing response. However, senescent fibroblasts in aged skin have recently been shown to express HLA-E, which bypasses recognition and clearance by natural killer and T cells. Here, approaches developed in the cancer field may also be useful, for example engineering T cells to express receptors that target specific cellular (tumour) proteins (reviewed in ). Studies to identify and validate new senescent cell receptors will be essential to the development and clinical application of such immune-regulated approaches.

Indeed, the emergence of global profiling methodologies, such as single-cell RNA sequencing, could provide the basis to understanding senescence-linked changes in ageing and pathology by identifying unique cell-based transcriptomic signatures within tissues. used this approach to compare cell frequency, heterogeneity and age-related transcriptomic changes between aged and young murine tissues. Similarly, combined transcriptomics and proteomics to not only identify the epigenetic and transcriptional consequences of ageing in the lung, but also determine their functional implications. Future harnessing of these technologies could therefore facilitate the identification and targeting of key senescence-linked receptors and biomarkers in a tissue and pathology-specific manner.

Alternative strategies to diminish or limit senescence and alleviate pathology instead target the SASP or specific senescence-linked receptors directly (summarised in Figure 3). Certainly, the SASP is transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB and others, and contributes heavily to tissue deterioration, both driving widespread destruction and reinforcing senescence. SASP inhibitors affect key transcriptional mediators, blocking signalling and preventing SASP production. Interestingly, Metformin, a widely used anti-diabetic drug, is an effective SASP inhibitor (reviewed in ) able to directly accelerate healing in diabetic mice. Rapamycin, another SASP inhibitor, was the first drug revealed to extend lifespan in mice, and enhance the replicative lifespan of human keratinocytes and skin fibroblasts in vitro. Although these studies suggest potential skin-related benefits of SASP inhibitors, removal of the SASP could be deleterious, impairing the healing response and preventing senescent cell clearance. Consequently, it may be more advantageous to target particular SASP components known to impact tissue function, either with antibodies (e.g., IL-1α, ), or specific inhibitors (e.g., against CXCR2, ).

We remain a long way from implementing senescence-targeted treatments for pathological wound healing, yet it is reassuring to see that current senolytic drugs display efficacy across a wide range of tissues and pathologies. In a number of studies, systemic senolytic treatments have been shown to have clear effects in peripheral target tissues across a range of treatment regimens. For example, a single dose of BCL inhibitor, and dosing over consecutive days, was able to reverse irradiation-induced senescence in different tissues. In the work by, aged mice showed improved physical performance following biweekly oral treatments of Dasatinib and Quercetin for 4 months, yet reduced SASP was observed in human ex vivo cultured adipose tissue within 48 h of treatment. Moreover, a single 3 day oral treatment of Dasatinib and Quercetin was able to reduce senescence in the adipose tissue of diabetic patients in a phase I trial. These studies therefore suggest that senolytic treatments not only have rapid effects in target peripheral tissues, but can overcome established tissue senescence.

Experimental studies do show beneficial effects of modulating senescence in the skin. For example, elimination of senescent cells from the epidermis restored proliferative capacity in hair follicle stem cells, known to participate in wound healing. Further, blockade of the potential senescence receptor, CXCR2, directly accelerated healing in human ex vivo skin wounds and diabetic murine wounds in vivo. Here, a CXCR2 antagonist was administered to wounds topically (ex vivo) and subcutaneously (in vivo), suggesting direct delivery to the wound site as a viable administration route. Indeed, elevated CXCR2 has previously been observed in diabetic wounds, and more recently in T cells from human diabetic patients. We note with interest that pharmacological inhibition of CXCR1/2 additionally prevents inflammation-mediated damage to pancreatic islets, thus prohibiting streptozocin-induced diabetes in mice. Therefore, CXCR2 appears a common factor in both the ontology and local pathology of diabetes. Senolytics should certainly be considered for the treatment of human chronic wounds characterised by high levels of senescence. However, given that knockdown of CXCR2 and ablation of senescent cells actually delays acute wound healing, future senescence-targeted therapies should be reserved for the treatment of chronic conditions.

Conclusion

Despite seemingly contradictory roles in many cancers, the detrimental contribution of cumulative senescence to ageing and age-related disease is now well-established. By contrast, the short-lived, transient senescence observed to benefit tissue development, regeneration and repair, remains significantly less well-characterised. In wound repair, a paradigm is emerging where local transient senescence predominately constrains fibrosis, while chronic senescence drives diabetic wound pathology. Indeed, experimentally blocking the senescence-linked receptor, CXCR2, in vivo reverses pathology and accelerates diabetic healing. These observations now pave the way to explore the beneficial effects of senescence-targeted therapies for the treatment of chronic wounds.

Author Contributions

HW wrote the manuscript and prepared the figures. MH provided critical appraisal. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 194

  1. 1.

    Acosta J. C. Banito A. Wuestefeld T. Georgilis A. Janich P. Morton J. P. (2013 ). A complex secretory program orchestrated by the inflammasome controls paracrine senescence. Nat. Cell Biol. 15 978–990.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2784

  2. 2.

    Acosta J. C. O’Loghlen A. Banito A. Guijarro M. V. Augert A. Raguz S. (2008 ). Chemokine signaling via the CXCR2 receptor reinforces senescence. Cell 133 1006–1018.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.038

  3. 3.

    Agger K. Cloos P. A. Rudkjær L. Williams K. Andersen G. Christensen J. (2009 ). The H3K27me3 demethylase JMJD3 contributes to the activation of the INK4A–ARF locus in response to oncogene-and stress-induced senescence. Genes Dev. 23 1171–1176.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.510809

  4. 4.

    Agren M. S. Steenfos H. H. Dabelsteen S. Hansen J. B. Dabelsteen E. (1999 ). Proliferation and mitogenic response to PDGF-BB of fibroblasts isolated from chronic venous leg ulcers is ulcer-age dependent. J. Invest. Dermatol. 112 463–469.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00549.x

  5. 5.
  6. 6.

    Anderson S. G. Shoo H. Saluja S. Anderson C. D. Khan A. Livingston M. (2018 ). Social deprivation modifies the association between incident foot ulceration and mortality in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study of a primary-care cohort. Diabetologia 61 959–967.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00125-017-4522-x

  7. 7.
  8. 8.

    Baker D. J. Childs B. G. Durik M. Wijers M. E. Sieben C. J. Zhong J. (2016 ). Naturally occurring p16 Ink4a-positive cells shorten healthy lifespan. Nature 530 184–189.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature16932

  9. 9.

    Baker D. J. Perez-Terzic C. Jin F. Pitel K. S. Niederländer N. J. Jeganathan K. (2008 ). Opposing roles for p16 Ink4a and p19 Arf in senescence and ageing caused by BubR1 insufficiency. Nat. Cell Biol. 10 825–836.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb1744

  10. 10.

    Baker D. J. Weaver R. L. van Deursen J. M. (2013 ). p21 both attenuates and drives senescence and aging in BubR1 progeroid mice. Cell Rep. 3 1164–1174.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.028

  11. 11.

    Baker D. J. Wijshake T. Tchkonia T. LeBrasseur N. K. Childs B. G. Van De Sluis B. (2011 ). Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders. Nature 47 232–236.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10600

  12. 12.

    Baum C. L. Arpey C. J. (2005 ). Normal cutaneous wound healing: clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events. Dermatol. Surg. 31 674–686.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31612

  13. 13.

    Benhamed M. Herbig U. Ye T. Dejean A. Bischof O. (2012 ). Senescence is an endogenous trigger for microRNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 14 266–275.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2443

  14. 14.
  15. 15.

    Bonda D. J. Lee H. G. Camins A. Pallàs M. Casadesus G. Smith M. A. (2011 ). The sirtuin pathway in ageing and Alzheimer disease: mechanistic and therapeutic considerations. Lancet Neurol. 10 275–279.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70013-8

  16. 16.

    Brockes J. P. Kumar A. (2005 ). Appendage regeneration in adult vertebrates and implications for regenerative medicine. Science 310 1919–1923.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1115200

  17. 17.

    Caley M. P. Martins V. L. O’Toole E. A. (2015 ). Metalloproteinases and wound healing. Adv. Wound Care 4 225–234.

    Not in our library10.1089/wound.2014.0581

  18. 18.

    Campisi J. (2013 ). Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 75 685–705.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183653

  19. 19.

    Campisi J. di Fagagna F. D. A. (2007 ). Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8 729–740.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm2233

  20. 20.

    Chang J. Wang Y. Shao L. Laberge R. M. Demaria M. Campisi J. (2016 ). Clearance of senescent cells by ABT263 rejuvenates aged hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Nat. Med. 22 78–83.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.4010

  21. 21.

    Chaturvedi V. Qin J. Z. Stennett L. Choubey D. Nickoloff B. (2004 ). Resistance to UV-induced apoptosis in human keratinocytes during accelerated senescence is associated with functional inactivation of p53. J. Cell. Physiol. 198 100–109.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.10392

  22. 22.

    Chen J. Huang X. Halicka D. Brodsky S. Avram A. Eskander J. (2006 ). Contribution of p16 INK4a and p21 CIP1 pathways to induction of premature senescence of human endothelial cells: permissive role of p53. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290 H1575–H1586.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpheart.00364.2005

  23. 23.

    Chien Y. Scuoppo C. Wang X. Fang X. Balgley B. Bolden J. E. (2011 ). Control of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype by NF-κB promotes senescence and enhances chemosensitivity. Genes Dev. 25 2125–2136.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.17276711

  24. 24.

    Childs B. G. Baker D. J. Kirkland J. L. Campisi J. Van Deursen J. M. (2014 ). Senescence and apoptosis: dueling or complementary cell fates? EMBO Rep. 15 1139–1153.

    Not in our library10.15252/embr.201439245

  25. 25.

    Citro A. Cantarelli E. Piemonti L. (2015 ). The CXCR1/2 pathway: involvement in diabetes pathophysiology and potential target for T1D interventions. Curr. Diab. Rep. 15:68.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11892-015-0638-x

  26. 26.

    Collado M. Blasco M. A. Serrano M. (2007 ). Cellular senescence in cancer and aging. Cell 130 223–233.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.003

  27. 27.

    Colman R. J. Beasley T. M. Kemnitz J. W. Johnson S. C. Weindruch R. Anderson R. M. (2014 ). Caloric restriction reduces age-related and all-cause mortality in rhesus monkeys. Nat. Commun. 5:3557.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms4557

  28. 28.

    Coppé J.-P. Desprez P.-Y. Krtolica A. Campisi J. (2010 ). The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 5 99–118.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144

  29. 29.

    Coppé J.-P. Kauser K. Campisi J. Beauséjour C. M. (2006 ). Secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor by primary human fibroblasts at senescence. J. Biol. Chem. 281 29568–29574.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m603307200

  30. 30.
  31. 31.

    Coppé J.-P. Rodier F. Patil C. K. Freund A. Desprez P.-Y. Campisi J. (2011 ). Tumor suppressor and aging biomarker p16INK4a induces cellular senescence without the associated inflammatory secretory phenotype. J. Biol. Chem. 286 36396–36403.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m111.257071

  32. 32.

    Coughlan M. T. Yap F. Y. Tong D. C. Andrikopoulos S. Gasser A. Thallas-Bonke V. (2011 ). Advanced glycation end products are direct modulators of β-cell function. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 60 2523–2532.

    Not in our library10.2337/db10-1033

  33. 33.

    Cuervo A. M. (2008 ). Autophagy and aging: keeping that old broom working. Trends Genet. 24 604–612.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2008.10.002

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Da Silva-Álvarez S. Picallos-Rabina P. Antelo-Iglesias L. Triana-Martínez F. Barreiro-Iglesias A. Sánchez L. (2019 ). The development of cell senescence. Exp. Gerontol. 128:110742.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.exger.2019.110742

  36. 36.

    Debacq-Chainiaux F. Erusalimsky J. D. Campisi J. Toussaint O. (2009 ). Protocols to detect senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-βgal) activity, a biomarker of senescent cells in culture and in vivo. Nat. Protoc. 4 1798–1806.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2009.191

  37. 37.

    Demaria M. Ohtani N. Youssef S. A. Rodier F. Toussaint W. Mitchell J. R. (2014 ). An essential role for senescent cells in optimal wound healing through secretion of PDGF-AA. Dev. Cell 31 722–733.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.012

  38. 38.

    Demidenko Z. N. Korotchkina L. G. Gudkov A. V. Blagosklonny M. V. (2010 ). Paradoxical suppression of cellular senescence by p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 9660–9664.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1002298107

  39. 39.

    Devalaraja R. M. Nanney L. B. Qian Q. Du J. Yu Y. Devalaraja M. N. (2000 ). Delayed wound healing in CXCR2 knockout mice. J. Invest. Dermatol. 115 234–244.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00034.x

  40. 40.

    Di Cunto F. Topley G. Calautti E. Hsiao J. Ong L. Seth P. K. (1998 ). Inhibitory function of p21Cip1/WAF1 in differentiation of primary mouse keratinocytes independent of cell cycle control. Science 280 1069–1072.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.280.5366.1069

All 194 references

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.