No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.
CCL19 and CCR7 Expression, Signaling Pathways, and Adjuvant Functions in Viral Infection and Prevention
Yan Yan, Renfang Chen, Xu Wang and 4 more
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · 2019 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 (CCL19) is a critical regulator of the induction of T cell activation, immune tolerance, and inflammatory responses during continuous immune surveillance, homeostasis, and development. Migration of CC-chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7)-expressing cells to secondary lymphoid organs is a crucial step in the onset of adaptive immunity, which is initiated by a complex interaction between CCR7 and its cognate ligands. Recent advances in knowledge regarding the response of the CCL19-CCR7 axis to viral infections have elucidated the complex network of interplay among the invading virus, target cells and host immune responses. Viruses use various strategies to evade or delay the cytokine response, gaining additional time to replicate in the host. In this review, we summarize the impacts of CCL19 and CCR7 expression on the regulation of viral pathogenesis with an emphasis on the corresponding signaling pathways and adjuvant mechanisms. We present and discuss the expression, signaling adaptor proteins and effects of CCL19 and CCR7 as these molecules differentially impact different viral infections and viral life cycles in host homeostatic strategies. The underlying mechanisms discussed in this review may assist in the design of novel agents to modulate chemokine activity for viral prevention.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
CCL19 and its receptor CCR7 control a diverse array of migratory events in adaptive immunity following antigen encounter by immunocytes. Recently, some rules governing the mechanisms of the CCL19-CCR7 axis in directing lymphocyte homing and encountering viruses have been clarified in vitro. In vivo, both the host’s antiviral and adjuvant-based immune responses are regulated by interactions among viral proteins, chemokine receptors and their downstream adaptor components. Changes in the bioavailability of CCR7/ligands (CCL19 and CCL21) may modulate the immunopathogenesis pathways of the host, thereby altering virus invasion. Hence, we systematically evaluated the contributions of CCL19 and CCR7 expression polymorphisms, signal transduction and CCL19-based adjuvant mechanisms in viral infections.
CCL19 and CCL21 have a conserved tetra-cysteine motif but only share 32% amino acid identity. Structurally, CCL21 differs from CCL19 because it has a uniquely long C-terminal tail containing an extra 37 amino acids (6 cysteine residues) that are highly positively charged and capable of binding glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). CCL19 is secreted by mature dendritic cells (mDCs), while CCL21 is secreted from the endothelium of afferent lymphatic vessels (this has been shown in mice, but evidence in humans is lacking), and both are predominantly secreted by the lumen of high endothelial venules, the stromal cells of the draining lymph node and the spleen. Due to their differential structures and expression patterns, CCL19 and CCL21 display different binding affinities for specific heparin or heparan sulfate, and distinct signaling responses are required for in vivo functions. CCR7 was the first identified lymphocyte-specific G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with seven transmembrane spanning alpha helices. CCR7 is expressed on double negative and single positive thymocytes, including naïve T cells, central memory T cells, regulatory T cells, naïve B cells, semi-mature/mature DCs and NK cells, and a minority of tumor cells, and it acts as a key regulator guiding homeostatic lymphocytes to secondary lymphoid organs. The CCR7-ligand axis carries out the following three fundamental “cellular reflexes”: message acquisition, semantic extraction and initiation of cell responses. Chemokine receptor internalization due to binding with a chemokine helps regulate chemokine activities. CCL19 is the only chemokine known to effectively stimulate β-arrestin-mediated CCR7 phosphorylation and internalization, leading to receptor desensitization and antigen-presenting dendritic cell (DC) migration. In particular, CCL19 displays obvious concentration- and time-dependent internalization in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, which differs from CCL21. Both ligands are able to activate G-protein signaling and elicit 3D chemotaxis and Ca2+ flux, but CCL19 has been shown to be relatively more potent (Figure 1).
Chemokines constitute a class of cytokines that control immunocyte migration to infection and inflammation sites in many biological processes. In different virus–host interactions, chemokine receptors may play a sensory function in the immune system, resulting in the production of the characteristic fingerprints of chemokines. The chemokine system can be mimicked by viruses, and viral proteins can act as antagonists or inappropriate agonists to use host chemokine receptors as modes of cellular invasion. For instance, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) masquerades as a “chemokine” to promote its fusion with target cells. Additionally, poxviruses and herpesviruses encode homologs of chemokine receptors that are expressed on their target cells, allowing the host chemokines to direct the infected cells to remote sites for viral dissemination. Based on the essential roles of the CCL19-CCR7 axis in organizing immunological and inflammatory responses, we summarize in this review its pathogenic roles in some viral infection conditions, such as infections by HIV-1, scrapie virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), influenza virus, dengue virus (DENV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and West Nile virus (WNV). The CCL19-CCR7 axis also plays a role in vaccine-based protection against multiple viruses, such as HIV-1, herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and pseudorabies virus. In addition, the CCL19-CCR7 interaction helps immune cells release antiviral-related cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ and IL-4), which promote T cell proliferation and antigen uptake by DC.
For many years, the focus on prophylactic vaccines aimed to elicit robust neutralizing antibody (Ab) responses. However, increasing evidence suggests that T cell-mediated immunity also plays a critical role in controlling persistent viral infections, such as HIV-1, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and HCV infections. Recently, various promising prophylactic vaccines in conjunction with adjuvant cytokines or chemokines, such as CCL19, have been investigated to enhance virus-specific cellular immune responses through cytokine polyfunctionality. For future therapeutic initiatives, it is important to understand the roles of the CCL19/CCR7 axis in modulating immune cell migration and activation to potentially differentiate the good and bad effects. In this review, we evaluate the functional efficacies of CCL19 and CCR7 in viral infection and prevention, which may facilitate the development of more potent, durable and safe T cell-based anti-virus pharmaceuticals or vaccines.
Decreased CCR7 Expression and Less Efficient Chemotactic Responses to CCL19 in the Context of Viral Infections
CCR7+ immune effector cells become dysfunctional during some viral infections, followed by the decreased expression of CCR7 during adaptive immune responses. CCR7 presents as a defining factor for non-polarized central (CCR7+) and polarized effector memory (CCR7–) T cells. CCR7 is expressed at high levels on naïve and central memory T cells and enables homeostasis T cell subsets to recirculate and home to T cell areas in lymphoid organs, such as the white pulp areas of the spleen and lymph nodes. During murine lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection, CCR7 is down-regulated on virus-specific CD8+ effector T cells in vivo. The down-regulation of CCR7 expression on virus-specific CD8+ effector T cells renders the cells unresponsive to chemokines from secondary lymphoid tissues, which limits T cell homing. It has been speculated that the exclusion of CD8+ effector T cells from the T-zone may represent an important mechanism protecting professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) against cytotoxic T cell attacks and, thus, preventing a premature decline in immune responses. During HIV-1 infection, the CCL19/CCR7 axis assists with establishing a latent infection. The CCR7 expression pattern is strongly correlated with increased HIV-1 viral reservoirs and is associated with chronic HIV-1 infection. Stimulation of HIV-1-infected primary CD4+ T cells with CCL19 results in the enhancement of both the motility of CCR7-dependent T cells and the permissiveness of resting memory T cells, leading to the efficient propagation of HIV-1. In addition, the HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu induces the down-regulation of CCR7 expression on the surface of HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells. Consistently, a clinical study showed that HIV-1-infected individuals lack CCR7 expression on natural killer (NK) cells. An HIV-1 and CMV coinfection study demonstrated that most (>70%) CD8+ effector T cells have a CCR7– phenotype in both the blood and lymph nodes. Furthermore, mechanistic studies have shown that HIV-1 gp120 can mimic chemokine sequences and significantly promote chemokine receptor-dependent CD4+ target-cell migration to remote lymph nodes, which likely leads to enhanced viral dissemination.
Similarly, two previous studies shows that mice infected with scrapie virus (ME7 strain) have been shown to exhibit an impaired splenic white pulp structure and markedly diminished T-zone areas in the spleen due to the decreased splenic expression of CCL19 and CCL21. Furthermore, decreased expression of T cell homing chemokines CCL19 and CCL21 resulted in a partial failure in CD4+ T cell recruitment to the spleen and expression of the memory marker CD44 on CCR7± CD4+ T cells was decreased in scrapie virus (ME7 strain)-infected mice compared to that in control mice (Table 1). Finally, high levels of the cellular prion protein [PrP(C)] and accumulated PrP(Sc) expressed by follicular DCs were detected in the ME7-infected spleens. During the infection of respiratory viruses, such as human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV), human metapneumovirus (HMPV) and human parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPIV3), can induce incomplete or short-lived virus-specific immunity. These viruses can produce symptomatic reinfections throughout life without undergoing significant antigenic changes. As a class of professional presentation cells, DCs can provide antigen presentation in the context of viral infection. However, human monocyte-derived DCs (mo-DCs) stimulated with HRSV, HMPV, or HPIV3 show an inefficient increase in CCR7 expression unless a secondary stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or a cocktail of proinflammatory cytokines is presented. In contrast, HRSV and HMPV infections induce less CCR7 expression and less efficient DC migration in response to CCL19 than HPIV3. The low expression of CCR7 mediates the inefficient migration of HRSV- and HMPV-stimulated DCs to lymphoid organs and causes impaired adaptive responses to these viruses, ultimately leading to abundant virus replication and tissue damage, thus resulting in more severe disease (Table 1).
During EBV infection, CCR7 expression likely plays an important role in pathogenesis. Compared with uninfected tonsillar B cells, CCR7 expression, which is critical for the migration of B cells into lymphoid tissues, has been shown to decline from day 2 after EBV infection and be undetectable by day 14 (Table 1). In addition, migration of EBV-infected cells toward CCL19 or CCL21 is impaired, although the expression of CCR7 in infected cells is similar to that in uninfected controls. CCR7 plays an essential role in B cell trafficking in lymphoid tissue, and its activation has been shown to be strictly dependent on a highly conserved cellular DNA binding factor (CBF1) as a blockade of or a deficiency in this factor results in the repression of immunoglobulin (Ig) expression in the context of EBV infection.
During Influenza A virus infection, the Th1-based immune response dominates the immune process. CCL19/CCL21 and CCR7 are well-known to be essential for fulfilling the important role of recruiting T cells into the lung and other peripheral specialized microenvironments within tissues (important pathogen entry sites). CCR7 plays an important role in the migration of T cells from lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches through high endothelial venules during mucosal immune protection. However, compared to uninfected mice, CCR7 expression has been shown to be down-regulated on influenza virus-specific CD4+ T cells obtained from the spleen, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) and the lungs at the peak of infection (Figure 2), indicating that these cells lost the ability to recirculate after the response to viral antigens (Ags).
Increased CCR7 Expression in the Context of Denv Infections
High expression of CCR7 on immunocytes has been observed in DENV infection. DCs are the most important target cells, and CCR7 expression has been shown to be increased on DENV-stimulated mo-DCs. However, mo-DCs with increased CCR7 expression have a greater opportunity to interact with abundant T cells and begin to secrete cytokines, metalloproteinases, and chemokines in the T-zone of draining lymph nodes. The clinical manifestations of DENV infection include dengue fever and potentially fatal phenomena, such as dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). The interaction between DENV and target immune effectors, cytokines or chemokines may lead to the development of severe clinical manifestations, such as DHF. In clinical therapy, some medicines, such as leflunomide, inhibit the excessive production of cytokines and chemokines from DENV-infected mo-DCs by suppressing mo-DC maturation. Similarly, DENV infection has been shown to specifically increase the mRNA and protein levels of Gal-9. Additionally, Gal-9 small interfering RNA downregulates CCR7 expression and suppresses DENV-specific DC migration toward the chemoattractants CCL19 and CCL21. Thus, a Gal-9 inhibitor might be useful for preventing immunopathogenesis in DENV infection. Similar functional molecules might be useful in drug development to prevent DENV immunopathogenesis by reducing the number of CCR7-expressing cells.
CCL19 Helps Establish Viral Integration and Latency and Down-Regulates CCR7 Expression in HIV-1 Infection
Via interacting with its receptor (CCR7), CCL19 has the potential to activate the signaling pathway enabling HIV-1 to enter the nucleus of resting (memory) T cells. HIV-1 latent infection in resting memory CD4+ T cells is a major barrier to HIV-1 eradication. The reversal of proviral latency has attracted much attention as a curative strategy for HIV-1 infection. CCL19-treated CXCR4-expressing CD4+ T cells have been shown to exhibit increased permissiveness for HIV-1 production, thereby facilitating provirus post-integration and latency. Furthermore, inoculation of CD4+ T cells with HIV causes a modest down-regulation (as shown via flow cytometry) of CCR7 expression and a slight increase of CCR5 expression after stimulation with CCL19. CCR5 is a co-receptor essential for HIV-1 entry into susceptible cells and is an attractive target for controlling HIV-1 infection. In addition, CCL19 and mDCs co-culture with CD4+ T cells has been shown to be beneficial for CCR5- and CXCR4-tropic virus latent infection in vitro.
CCR7 Is Required for the Sufficient Migration of Mature Dendritic Cells (mDCs) and T Cells Into the Draining Lymph Nodes Following Viral Infections
In the context of chronic HBV infection, mDCs are highly migratory, which is accompanied by the up-regulation of CCR7 expression on hepatic mDCs and an increase in the response to CCL19. In two studies, immature hepatic DCs did not respond to any tested chemokines, despite the expression of mRNA transcripts encoding the appropriate receptors for these chemokines, and CCR7 expression was strongly enhanced in response to DC maturation. Hepatic mDCs play a critical role in promoting immune tolerance by producing IL-10 and TGFβ, activating regulatory T cells or regulatory B cells and suppressing effector T cell proliferation. Compared with the robust responses at clinical onset, HBV-specific CD8+ T cell responses are rather weak and limited, which may lead to viral persistence and disease progression. However, acute inflammation may convert hepatic mDCs from a tolerogenic phenotype, allowing these cells to activate T cells.
CCR7 expression can induce the migration of antigen-specific effector and central memory T cells to the lymph nodes via the chemotactic response to CCL19. The major phenotype and functions of pathogen-specific CD8+ T cells may differ in different viral infections. The quantitative and qualitative compositions of the immune cells in the liver markedly differ from those in secondary lymphoid organs, including the spleen, lymph nodes and peripheral blood. The hepatic CD8+/CD4+ T cell ratio is 3.5:1; however, this ratio is the reverse of the 1:2 CD8+/CD4+ T cell ratio found in secondary lymphoid organs. CD8+ T cells play crucial roles in HBV control and liver inflammation. Several studies have investigated CCR7 expression by HBV-specific CD8+ T cells in the context of chronic HBV infection. Up-regulation of programed death-1 (PD-1) expression can impair HBV-specific memory CD8+ T cell responses, resulting in the functional suppression of IFN-γ production. Additionally, blockage of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions in vitro increases the frequency of HBV-specific CD8+ T cells, and enhances CCR7, CD45RA, and CD127 expression in these cells, resulting in increased cell proliferation and IFN-γ production (Table 1).
Chronic infections with blood-borne pathogens, such as HIV-1, HBV and HCV, tend to increase the development of memory homeostasis T cells. During primary viral infections, virus-specific T cell responses are vigorous; however, once a persistent infection is established, both virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells become dysfunctional or difficult to detect ex vivo. Virus-specific CD8+ effector T cells play a critical role in eliminating HIV-1, EBV, HBV, CMV and HCV infections, and the expression patterns of CCR7, CD27, and CD28 exhibit similar characteristics during the primary infection phase and chronic phase of a persistent infection. The CCR7+ CD27+, CCR7– CD27+, and CCR7– CD27– phenotypes can represent the early, median, and late stages of memory CD8+ T cell differentiation, respectively, while a down-regulated expression of these molecules indicates an inability of T cells to differentiate toward the effector phenotype. Several studies report that the removal of effector T cells from circulation favors the recruitment of CCR7+ naïve cells, which may result in an impairment in the generation of functionally competent memory T cells and an inability to control viral replication.
Mature dendritic cells and T cells that express CCR7 enhance the velocity of T cell locomotion within the lymph nodes and, thus, increase the likelihood that T cells encounter DCs. In influenza virus infection, high levels of CCR7+ IFN-γ+ CD4+ T cells have been observed in lung draining lymph nodes. A study investigating the kinetics of chemokine expression showed that the levels of CCL19, CCL22, and CXCL13 are significantly up-regulated during the third wave (8 to 24 h) of influenza virus infection, which helps CCR7+ DCs reach the lymphoid organs and attract naïve T and B cells (Table 1).
The major adaptive immune lymphocytes present in the lungs of human infants who have died from severe RSV infection are B cells. The B cell differentiation factor BAFF is an indicator of pulmonary Ab responses after HRSV, HMPV, H1N1, bocavirus, rhinovirus and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. CCL19 and other chemokines, particularly CXCL12, CXCL13 and CCL21, influence B cell and human blood DC (i.e., plasmacytoid and myeloid DCs) differentiation, migration and homeostasis. The expression kinetics of these chemokines has been reported to be related to the airway epithelial innate immune response to respiratory virus infections. CCL19 has been shown to be expressed in lung tissues 1, 2, and 7 days after infection with RSV. However, in the context of influenza virus infection, CCL19 and CCL21 levels have been reported to be increased during the late wave. These variable results may be explained by differences in the models or sampling methods used (Table 1).
During homeostasis, CCR7 regulates the homing of T cells into lymphoid organs. During WNV infections, CCR7+ DCs regulate the homing of T cells expressing the cognate ligands CCL19 or CCL21 into the lymph nodes immediately following infection and restrict leukocyte migration into the brain. Leukocyte hypercellularity within the central nervous system (CNS) contributes to CNS viremia, neuroinflammation, and increased mortality. Thus, CCR7 acts as a host defense restriction factor limiting neuroinflammation during acute WNV infection (Table 1).
Taken together, these data show that host responses to viral infections involve distinct effectors of innate and adaptive immunity and that the lymphocyte mobilization mediated by these effectors needs to be coordinated to ensure protection. Both inflammatory and homeostatic chemokines are involved in the control of the trafficking of effector or memory cells. Inflammatory chemokines determine the cellular infiltrates at sites of pathogen entry, whereas inflammation and homeostatic chemokines regulate the inflammation-independent, continuous trafficking of memory cells through healthy peripheral tissues.
CCL19-CCR7 Axis Signaling Pathways in Viral Infections
The CCL19-CCR7 axis is involved in the constitutive migration and homing of lymphocytes. Furthermore, the CCL19-CCR7 axis has been shown to perform other biological activities, such as regulation of DC morphologic change and thymic T cell development and suppression of DC apoptosis, which can lead to the regulation of adaptive immunity and tolerance. This axis performs its biological functions by activation of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GPK)/β-arrestin that transduces the binding of extracellular stimuli to intracellular signaling. CCL19 but not CCL21 induces robust β-arrestin 2 recruitment and results in serine/threonine-phosphorylated receptor CCR7 internalization to endosomal vesicles, thereby efficiently limits receptor susceptibility to extracellular ligands (Figure 1). In addition, CCL19 has been shown to be more efficient than CCL21 in activating ERK1/2 (part of the MAP kinase cascade) through Gαi subunit and increasing Ca2+ flux through the Gβγ subunit (Figure 3). CCR7, as a homeostatic chemokine receptor, inhibits adenylate cyclase, and limits the level of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and the activation of protein kinase A (PKA). Similar to other GPCRs, CCR7 plays a crucial role in activating or inhibiting downstream signaling adaptors in viral infections through G-protein-promoted secondary messengers, including cAMP, Ca2+, and phosphoinositides (Figure 3). The following three principle modes are involved in the GPCR homeostatic regulation: desensitization (receptor becomes refractory to continued stimuli), internalization (receptors are physically removed from the cell surface by endocytosis) and down-regulation (cellular receptor levels are decreased). In addition to inducing directional steering in cells, CCR7 provides costimulatory and survival cues. Moreover, CCR7-mediated human T cell polarization and migration have been shown to be linked to protein–protein interactions in cell signaling across multiple cellular compartments.
Over the past few years, numerous CCL19-based signaling-related adaptor molecules have been reported in CCR7 signaling pathways, and their specific functions during viral infections are summarized in Figure 3. Viruses have been well-demonstrated to have highly efficient strategies to modulate and prevent the transduction of apoptotic signals to favor their infections through viral proteins, such as the HBx gene product of HBV. For this review, we searched CCR7-associated chemokine signaling pathways in the KEGG PATHWAY Database1 and discuss the multiple regulatory mechanisms of CCR7 signaling and the influences on CCR7 functions during viral infections.
The HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu reduces CCR7 expression on CD4+ T cells. Vpu specifically interacts and colocalizes with CCR7 in the trans-Golgi network in which CCR7 is retained. The stimulation of HIV-1-infected primary CD4+ T cells with CCL19 reduces mobilization of Ca2+, reduces phosphorylation of Erk1/2, and impairs migration toward CCL19. Studies concerning CCL19-CCR7 signaling have shown that CCL19-induced signaling proteins mediate HIV-1 integration in CD4+ T cells at several integration sites and that this process is suppressed by inhibitors of the PI3K, NF-κB and MEK/Ras/Raf signaling pathways (Figure 3). Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor ruxolitinib to diminish the release of multiple cytokines and thereby prevent their effects on latency reversal in HIV-1-positive patients. A combination of ingenol compounds with the JAK inhibitor may represent a novel strategy for HIV-1 eradication.
The infection of DCs with DENV causes cell maturation and probably enhances cell migration to lymphoid organs to promote interactions with T cells. At 48 h post-infection, the number of CCR7+ mo-DCs increases, and the increase in cell number is accompanied by the significant activation of the COX-2-PGE2 signaling pathway in migrating DCs. All MAPK inhibitors and the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib suppress DENV-induced PGE2 production to basal levels. The mechanisms involved in the activation of COX-2 include the activation of the IKK-NF-κB and MAPK-activator protein-1 (AP-1) signaling pathways. Several COX-2 upstream signaling molecules have been suggested to be useful for the treatment or control of viral infections. For example, the blockade of ERK, which is upstream of the MKK1/2 kinase, suppresses virus infectivity by inhibiting early gene expression in human CMV (hCMV) infections. Additionally, leflunomide has been shown to be an effective therapeutic drug for DENV infection. Leflunomide inhibits DENV-induced mo-DC migration in response to the chemoattractant CCL19 by suppressing CCR7 expression and the NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways.
CCL19 as a Molecular Adjuvant Enhances Virus-Specific Immune Responses
Cytokines have been successfully used as molecular adjuvants to promote virus-specific humoral and cellular immune responses by modifying the magnitude, intensity, nature, and duration of the responses. The positive effects of chemokines as immunomodulators of vaccines against viral infections remain to be further evaluated. CCL19 has been postulated as a promising adjuvant candidate for vaccines against both cancers and infectious diseases due to its paramount importance in immune response formation and its diverse effects on DC and lymphocyte migration and activation. CCL19 also controls lymphocyte localization during T cell development in response to immunization. Activated T cells lead to alterations in the expression of various molecules, including integrins (α4β3, LFA-1), selectins, and chemokine receptors, leading to the modulation of key intracellular signaling events that promote T cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration to inflamed tissues (Figure 2).
In the context of viral neutralizing antibodies (nAbs), studies have shown that both monomeric gp120 and trimeric gp140 HIV-1 vaccines induce neutralizing antibody responses but still lack sufficient breadth to effectively protect against diverse HIV-1 isolates. HSV-2 gB or gD subunit vaccines could induce high levels of neutralizing Abs but could not efficiently protect mice against a viral challenge. Thus, effective vaccines may be needed to broadly induce neutralizing Abs. DNA vaccines are generally considered suboptimal for inducing humoral responses, particularly in humans. Strategies to overcome these limitations include the optimization of plasmid backbones, the use of molecular adjuvants and changing the delivery methods. We previously explored the possibility that the use of chemokine CCL19 or CCL28 could optimize systemic and mucosal humoral responses to a HIV-1 vaccine candidate gp140, which is the primary target of Ab-mediated antiviral functions. In the CCL19 adjuvant group, CCR7 showed a high expression on activated B cells, T cells and DCs in secondary lymphoid organs, which was beneficial for increasing the chance of interactions among B cells, T cells, and DCs in the local tissue (Table 2).
In the context of cellular immune responses, several potential roles of molecular adjuvants, such as cytokines and costimulatory molecules, in vaccination strategies have been investigated. Currently, various promising prophylactic vaccines focused on inducing substantial vaccine-specific T cell responses have been developed. Increased breadth in the vaccine-induced T cell response has been found to be beneficial against many chronic pathogens. The molecular adjuvant CCL19 plays an important role in augmenting the trafficking of T cell-based vaccines into regional T cell compartments through efficient CCR7 gene transduction and participates in the priming and preparation of antigen-specific T cells and the production of Abs.
In chronic viral infections, memory B and T cells are more numerically and functionally superior to neutralizing antibodies than the corresponding naïve precursor cells that are present before infection as memory lymphocytes tend to induce rapid and powerful recall responses. Because neutralizing antibodies fail to provide control over persisting viral infections (e.g., herpesviruses, HIV-1, and HCV), therapeutic immunizations should focus on generating strong cellular T cell-based immunity and more virus-specific memory immunocytes. Live attenuated, synthetic and subunit vaccines are all able to elicit central memory T cells, effector memory T cells and resident memory T cells, and these responses are highly dependent on the addition of adjuvants and the route of administration.
Substantial evidence indicates that CCL19-adjuvanted vaccine recipients produce CD4+/CD8+ T cells more promptly and at higher levels than recipients administered a control vector lacking CCL19 (Table 2). In a study coadministering HSV-1 vaccine and plasmids encoding CCL19 (pCCL19) and HSV-1 gB (pgB), CCR7high DCs were activated and migrated, resulting in the enhancement of antigen uptake and presumably the augmentation of naïve T cell priming. Compared with pCCL19 delivered alone, the codelivery of pCCL19 and pgB induced a notable increase in lung CD11c+ DCs. In the pCCL19-codelivery group, the CD8+ T cells isolated from the lungs produced more IFN-γ. Consistently, it appears that CCL19 codelivery may lead to the induction of functional memory CD8+ T cells. The high level of IFN-γ observed in these CD8+ T cells may suggest that the enhanced potential to secrete IFN-γ plays a notable protective role in lethal mucosal HSV-1 challenges. In our HIV-1 and HSV-2 vaccine studies, adjuvant CCL19 codelivery produces a balanced enhancement of HIV-1 gp140- or HSV-2 gB-specific Th1/Th2 responses. Such enhancements appear to be associated with the mobilization of abundant CCR7+ immunocyte migration to secondary lymphoid organs and mucosal tissue. Similarly, a previous HCV vaccine study showed that CCL19 contributes to the activation of DCs and CD4+ T cells, enhances CD8+ T cell accumulation and helps attract rare virus-specific T cells in the context of HCV core DNA vaccination in mice. CCL19 as molecular adjuvant is helpful in increasing the naïve T cell sensitivity to low density Ag presentation. Such functional studies might be helpful for human virus vaccine development.
Regarding virus challenges, whether enhanced immunity mediated by adjuvant CCL19 can protect animals against genital tract mucosal infections has been tested, and previous studies have demonstrated that CCL19 enhances the protective responses to an HSV-1 challenge. In these studies, a CCL19 protective vaccination regimen was shown to elicit increased serum and vaginal HSV-1 gB-specific IgG and IgA Ab levels through intranasal mucosal immunization. CCL19 appeared to play a pivotal role in increasing Ab responses (levels of total Abs, virus-specific Abs and neutralizing Abs). Furthermore, CCL19 enhanced gB-specific immune responses by improving the kinetics and distribution of the adaptive immune response to the codelivered antigen and protected animals against genital infection by HSV-2. Finally, the results showed that the fusion constructs induced strong HSV-2 gB-specific IgG and IgA Ab levels in mouse sera and vaginal fluids. In a different study, we revealed that a gB-CCL19 fusion construct exhibited a stronger ability to increase the numbers of CCR7+ immunocytes in secondary lymphoid tissue and IgA+ cells in mucosal sites (Figure 2). The enhanced systemic and vaginal mucosal Abs protected the tested mice against a lethal intravaginal HSV-2 challenge in vivo. These findings may provide an effective strategy for the design of vaccines against mucosal infection by sexually transmitted viruses.
Conclusion and Perspectives for CCL19 Use for the Prevention of Viral Infections
This review seeks to address how we can apply the current understanding of CCL19 and CCR7 functions to better understand the pathogenesis of viral infections and better treat or prevent viral diseases. CCL19 and CCR7 are essential players in the balance between immunity and tolerance. CCL19 promotes activation-induced cell death (AICD) in antigen-specific CD4+ T cells, and this chemokine regulates not only T cell mobilization but also the post-activation fate of T cells. It is a key step to understanding the appropriate initial programing signals as the signaling pathways of CCR7 elicited by CCL19 during priming or boosting influences the development of lymphocytes. Information regarding the differences in anatomical location, activation, and differentiation between memory T cells in lymphoid organs and those in non-inducing lymphoid organs could also be very valuable. We believe that recent advances in the field of target cell signaling stimulation coupled with animal models that express viral antigens could provide an opportunity to directly address some of these questions in a living animal. Such work will not only improve our understanding of CCL19 and CCR7 expression and their functions during viral infections but may also provide tools for the design of new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of viral infections and the prevention of invading pathogens.
Several lymphocyte-targeted chemokines, such as CCL19, CCL21 and CCL28, are known to be important for regulating adaptive immune responses during viral infection, and their engagement with cognate receptors can result in enhanced T cell activation, expansion, and survival as well as the establishment of long-term memory. The most important feature of the immune system is its ability to produce protective immune responses against pathogens while maintaining tolerance to self-antigens and innocuous environmental Ags. Therefore, chemokines have the potential to serve as effective immunomodulatory components of prophylactic vaccines against chronic viruses.
Author Contributions
YY, RC, XW, and KH analyzed the data. YY drafted the manuscript. LH, ML, and QH reviewed and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References 112
- 1.
Abe M. Zahorchak A. Colvin B. Thomson A. (2004 ). Migratory responses of murine hepatic myeloid, lymphoid-related, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells to CC chemokines. Transplantation 78 762–765.
Not in our library10.1097/01.tp.0000130450.61215.3b
- 2.
Alcami A. (2003 ). Viral mimicry of cytokines, chemokines and their receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3 36–50.
Not in our library10.1038/nri980
- 3.
Alturaiki W. McFarlane A. J. Rose K. Corkhill R. McNamara P. S. Schwarze J. (2018 ). Expression of the B cell differentiation factor BAFF and chemokine CXCL13 in a murine model of Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection. Cytokine 110 267–271.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cyto.2018.01.014
- 4.
Anderson C. Solari R. Pease J. E. (2016 ). Biased agonism at chemokine receptors: obstacles or opportunities for drug discovery? J. Leukoc. Biol. 99 901–909.
Not in our library10.1189/jlb.2mr0815-392r
- 5.
Anderson J. L. Mota T. M. Evans V. A. Kumar N. Rezaei S. D. Cheong K. (2016 ). Understanding factors that modulate the establishment of HIV latency in resting CD4+ T-cells in vitro. PLoS One 11:e0158778.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0158778
- 6.
Appay V. Dunbar P. R. Callan M. Klenerman P. Gillespie G. M. A. Papagno L. (2002 ). Memory CD8+ T cells vary in differentiation phenotype in different persistent virus infections. Nat. Med. 8 379–385.
Not in our library10.1038/nm0402-379
- 7.
Aritomi K. Kuwabara T. Tanaka Y. Nakano H. Yasuda T. Ishikawa F. (2010 ). Altered antibody production and helper T cell function in mice lacking chemokines CCL19 and CCL21-Ser. Microbiol. Immunol. 54 691–701.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00266.x
- 8.
Bardi G. Lipp M. Baggiolini M. Loetscher P. (2001 ). The T cell chemokine receptor CCR7 is internalized on stimulation with ELC, but not with SLC. Eur. J. Immunol. 31 3291–3297.
Not in our library10.1002/1521-4141(200111)31:11<3291::aid-immu3291>3.0.co;2-z
- 9.
Bardina S. V. Brown J. A. Michlmayr D. Hoffman K. W. Sum J. Pletnev A. G. (2017 ). Chemokine receptor Ccr7 restricts fatal west nile virus encephalitis. J. Virol. 91 e02409–e02416.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02409-16
- 10.
Baskic D. Vukovic V. R. Popovic S. Djurdjevic P. Zaric M. Nikolic I. (2017 ). Cytokine profile in chronic hepatitis C: an observation. Cytokine 96 185–188.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cyto.2017.04.008
- 11.
Birkenbach M. Josefsen K. Yalamanchili R. Lenoir G. Kieff E. (1993 ). Epstein-Barr virus-induced genes: first lymphocyte-specific G protein-coupled peptide receptors. J. Virol. 67 2209–2220.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.67.4.2209-2220.1993
- 12.
Bock A. Bermudez M. Krebs F. Matera C. Chirinda B. Sydow D. (2016 ). Ligand binding ensembles determine graded agonist efficacies at a G protein-coupled receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 291 16375–16389.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m116.735431
- 13.
Boettler T. Panther E. Bengsch B. Nazarova N. Spangenberg H. C. Blum H. E. (2006 ). Expression of the interleukin-7 receptor alpha chain (CD127) on virus-specific CD8+ T cells identifies functionally and phenotypically defined memory T cells during acute resolving hepatitis B virus infection. J. Virol. 80 3532–3540.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.80.7.3532-3540.2006
- 14.
Cameron P. U. Saleh S. Sallmann G. Solomon A. Wightman F. Evans V. A. (2010 ). Establishment of HIV-1 latency in resting CD4+ T cells depends on chemokine-induced changes in the actin cytoskeleton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 16934–16939.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1002894107
- 15.
Cao W. Qiu Z. Zhu T. Li Y. Han Y. Li T. (2014 ). CD8+ T cell responses specific for hepatitis B virus core protein in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J. Clin. Virol. 61 40–46.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcv.2014.06.022
- 16.
Carotenuto P. Artsen A. Osterhaus A. D. Pontesilli O. (2011 ). Reciprocal changes of naïve and effector/memory CD8+T lymphocytes in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Viral Immunol. 24 27–33.
Not in our library10.1089/vim.2010.0067
- 17.
Chensue S. W. (2001 ). Molecular machinations: chemokine signals in host-pathogen interactions. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14 821–835.
Not in our library10.1128/cmr.14.4.821-835.2001
- 18.
Cillo A. R. Sobolewski M. D. Bosch R. J. Fyne E. Piatak M. Jr. Coffin J. M. (2014 ). Quantification of HIV-1 latency reversal in resting CD4+ T cells from patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 7078–7083.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1402873111
- 19.
Comerford I. Harata-Lee Y. Bunting M. D. Gregor C. Kara E. E. McColl S. R. (2013 ). A myriad of functions and complex regulation of the CCR7/CCL19/CCL21 chemokine axis in the adaptive immune system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 24 269–283.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.03.001
- 20.
Comerford I. Milasta S. Morrow V. Milligan G. Nibbs R. (2006 ). The chemokine receptor CCX-CKR mediates effective scavenging of CCL19 in vitro. Eur. J. Immunol. 36 1904–1916.
Not in our library10.1002/eji.200636327
- 21.
Damås J. K. Øktedalen O. Ueland T. Landrø L. Barstad J. Müller F. (2012 ). Enhanced levels of CCL19 in patients with advanced acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin. Exp. Immunol. 167 492–498.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04524.x
- 22.
de Paz J. L. Moseman E. A. Noti C. Polito L. von Andrian U. H. Seeberger P. H. (2007 ). Profiling heparin-chemokine interactions using synthetic tools. ACS Chem. Biol. 2 735–744.
Not in our library10.1021/cb700159m
- 23.
Debes G. F. Bonhagen K. Wolff T. Kretschmer U. Krautwald S. Kamradt T. (2004 ). CC chemokine receptor 7 expression by effector/memory CD4+ T cells depends on antigen specificity and tissue localization during influenza A virus infection. J. Virol. 78 7528–7535.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.78.14.7528-7535.2004
- 24.
Doherty P. C. Topham D. J. Tripp R. A. Cardin R. D. Brooks J. W. Stevenson P. G. (1997 ). Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell mechanisms in the control of respiratory virus infections. Immunol. Rev. 159 105–117.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-065x.1997.tb01010.x
- 25.
Doosti M. Nassiri M. Nasiri K. Tahmoorespur M. Zibaee S. (2019 ). Immunogenic evaluation of FMD virus immuno-dominant epitopes coupled with IL-2/FcIgG in BALB/c mice. Microb. Pathog. 132 30–37.
Not in our library10.1016/j.micpath.2019.04.019
- 26.
Dunham J. van Driel N. Eggen B. J. Paul C. ‘t Hart BA. Laman J. D. (2017 ). Analysis of the cross-talk of Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells with T cells in the marmoset. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 6:e127.
Not in our library10.1038/cti.2017.1
- 27.
Ehlin-Henriksson B. Liang W. Cagigi A. Mowafi F. Klein G. Nilsson A. (2009 ). Changes in chemokines and chemokine receptor expression on tonsillar B cells upon Epstein-Barr virus infection. Immunology 127 549–557.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.03029.x
- 28.
Ellefsen K. Harari A. Champagne P. Bart P. A. Sékaly R. P. Pantaleo G. (2002 ). Distribution and functional analysis of memory antiviral CD8 T cell responses in HIV-1 and cytomegalovirus infections. Eur. J. Immunol. 32 3756–3764.
Not in our library10.1002/1521-4141(200212)32:12<3756::aid-immu3756>3.0.co;2-e
- 29.
Fisicaro P. Barili V. Montanini B. Acerbi G. Ferracin M. Guerrieri F. (2017 ). Targeting mitochondrial dysfunction can restore antiviral activity of exhausted HBV-specific CD8 T cells in chronic hepatitis B. Nat. Med. 23 327–336.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.4275
- 30.
Förster R. Davalos-Misslitz A. C. Rot A. (2008 ). CCR7 and its ligands: balancing immunity and tolerance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8 362–371.
Not in our library10.1038/nri2297
- 31.
Förster R. Schubel A. Breitfeld D. Kremmer E. Renner-Müller I. Wolf E. (1999 ). CCR7 coordinates the primary immune response by establishing functional microenvironments in secondary lymphoid organs. Cell 99 23–33.
Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80059-8
- 32.
Freire-de-Lima L. Nardy A. F. F. R. Ramos-Junior E. S. Conde L. Santos Lemos J. Fonseca L. M. D. (2017 ). Multiple myeloma cells express key immunoregulatory cytokines and modulate the monocyte migratory response. Front. Med. 4:92.
Not in our library10.3389/fmed.2017.00092
- 33.
García-Arriaza J. Perdiguero B. Heeney J. L. Seaman M. S. Montefiori D. C. Yates N. L. (2017 ). HIV/AIDS vaccine candidates based on replication-competent recombinant poxvirus NYVAC-C-KC expressing trimeric gp140 and gag-derived virus-like particles or lacking the viral molecule B19 that inhibits type I Interferon activate relevant HIV-1-specific B and T cell immune functions in nonhuman primates. J. Virol. 91 e02182–e02198.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02182-16
- 34.
Gebhardt T. Palendira U. Tscharke D. C. Bedoui S. (2018 ). Tissue-resident memory T cells in tissue homeostasis, persistent infection, and cancer surveillance. Immunol. Rev. 283 54–76.
Not in our library10.1111/imr.12650
- 35.
Griffith J. W. Sokol C. L. Luster A. D. (2014 ). Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32 659–702.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120145
- 36.
Gupta S. Clark E. S. Termini J. M. Boucher J. Kanagavelu S. LeBranche C. C. (2015 ). DNA vaccine molecular adjuvants SP-D-BAFF and SP-D-APRIL enhance anti-gp120 immune response and increase HIV-1 neutralizing antibody titers. J. Virol. 89 4158–4169.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02904-14
- 37.
Han Y. W. Aleyas A. G. George J. A. Kim S. J. Kim H. K. Yoo D. J. (2009 ). Genetic co-transfer of CCR7 ligands enhances immunity and prolongs survival against virulent challenge of pseudorabies virus. Immunol. Cell Biol. 87 91–99.
Not in our library10.1038/icb.2008.69
- 38.
Hartoonian C. Sepehrizadeh Z. Tabatabai Yazdi M. Jang Y. S. Langroudi L. Amir Kalvanagh P. (2014 ). Enhancement of immune responses by co-delivery of CCL19/MIP-3beta chemokine plasmid with HCV core DNA/protein immunization. Hepat. Mon. 14:e14611.
Not in our library10.5812/hepatmon.14611
- 39.
Hauser M. A. Legler D. F. (2016 ). Common and biased signaling pathways of the chemokine receptor CCR7 elicited by its ligands CCL19 and CCL21 in leukocytes. J. Leukoc. Biol. 99 869–882.
Not in our library10.1189/jlb.2mr0815-380r
- 40.
Hayasaka H. Kobayashi D. Yoshimura H. Nakayama E. E. Shioda T. Miyasaka M. (2015 ). The HIV-1 Gp120/CXCR4 axis promotes CCR7 ligand-dependent CD4 T cell migration: CCR7 homo- and CCR7/CXCR4 hetero-oligomer formation as a possible mechanism for up-regulation of functional CCR7. PLoS One 10:e0117454.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0117454
Cited by papers we hold 3
- Lymphatic-preserving treatment sequencing with immune checkpoint inhibition unleashes cDC1-dependent antitumor immunity in HNSCC · 2022No notice
- A Two-Gene-Based Diagnostic Signature for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms · 2021Not checked
- Overcoming Challenges for CD3-Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Solid Tumors · 2021No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.