Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Circular approach of greener broiler chicken production

Nikolett Éva Kiss, Nikolett Éva Kiss, Attila Nagy and 3 more

Frontiers in Built Environment · 2025

doi:10.3389/fbuil.2025.1646565 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The sustainability of agricultural production is a key issue, particularly in terms of fertilizer use, greenhouse gas emissions, and resource depletion. This study uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental impacts of composted and pelletized poultry manure (CPPL) and six different fertilizers (ammonium nitrate (AN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), urea, monoammonium phosphate (MAP), triple superphosphate (TSP), and potassium chloride (KCl)) during corn and winter wheat production, as well as their impact on broiler chicken production. The study also took into account different fertilization methods and seasonal variations (summer and winter rotation), analyzing eleven environmental impact categories, including global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), abiotic resource use (abiotic depletion potential for elements (ADPe), abiotic depletion potential for fossil fuels (ADPf)), ozone layer depletion potential (ODP), photochemical oxidation potential (POP) and ecotoxicity potentials (freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity potential (FAETP), human toxicity potential (HTP), marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential (MAETP), terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (TETP)). Based on the results, GWP was 11%–14% lower for CPPL production compared to fertilizers, while ADPf was 14%–56% lower. At the same time, AP was significantly higher for CPPL, mainly due to ammonia emissions. In crop production (corn, winter wheat), CPPL-based nutrient replenishment resulted in 11%–34% lower GWP and 14%–56% lower ADPf in most environmental scenarios compared to fertilizer treatments. In toxic impact categories (e.g., FAETP, MAETP), reductions of 3%–15% were observed. However, AP values were 2.6%–6.8% higher, and EP could be up to twice as high as for fertilizer treatments. In broiler chicken farming, when feed was produced from CPPL-grown crops, the environmental impact was 30%–85% lower in almost all categories examined than with fertilizer-based feed. Seasonal differences were moderate, with a 3%–5% increase in some categories during winter. Based on the results, CPPL offers a promising alternative to chemical fertilizers, especially in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient leaching. In line with circular economy principles, CPPL can contribute to the development of more sustainable agricultural systems.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References74

    40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    All 74 references

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.