Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

Recent Development of Probiotic Bifidobacteria for Treating Human Diseases

Jun Chen, Xinyi Chen, Chun Loong Ho

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.770248 (opens in a new tab)

Abstract

Bifidobacterium is a non-spore-forming, Gram-positive, anaerobic probiotic actinobacterium and commonly found in the gut of infants and the uterine region of pregnant mothers. Like all probiotics, Bifidobacteria confer health benefits on the host when administered in adequate amounts, showing multifaceted probiotic effects. Examples include B. bifidum, B. breve, and B. longum , common Bifidobacterium strains employed to prevent and treat gastrointestinal disorders, including intestinal infections and cancers. Herein, we review the latest development in probiotic Bifidobacteria research, including studies on the therapeutic impact of Bifidobacterial species on human health and recent efforts in engineering Bifidobacterium . This review article would provide readers with a wholesome understanding of Bifidobacteria and its potentials to improve human health.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Probiotic microorganisms are defined as living microorganisms that confer health benefiting properties to the host when administered adequately. Probiotics exert beneficial functions mainly through producing antimicrobial peptides, assimilating dietary fibers, regulating fat storage, modulating mucosal immunity, or regulating gut microbiota. For centuries, probiotics have been widely used in various functional foods, e.g., yoghurt, milk, cheese, infant formula, and dietary supplements. The most common probiotics include Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria, which predominantly inhabit the animal or human intestinal tract. Bifidobacteria are V- or Y-type branched, rod-shaped, immobile, non-spore-forming, Gram-positive, anaerobic, catalase-negative bacteria that belong to the family Bifidobacteriaceae and the phylum Actinobacteria. The Bifidobacterium genus currently includes over 90 species, excluding the unclassified species (Supplementary Table S1). Bifidobacterium was first isolated from breast-fed infant feces, but so far have been discovered from various ecological niches including sewage, fermented milk and anaerobic digestion facilities; nevertheless, the most frequent isolates are associated with the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and animals. The growth conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, oxygen level) of Bifidobacteria do not vary significantly among strains. For instance, the optimal growth temperature ranges between 36 and 38°C and 41–43°C for human- and animal-isolated strains, respectively. Additionally, the optimal growth pH is around pH 6.5–7.0, where B. animalis and B. thermacidophilum were found to be also metabolically active at pH 3.5–4.0. Most Bifidobacterial species are strict anaerobes, with a few exceptions, such as B. boum, B. thermophilum, B. dentium and B. psychraerophilum that tolerate microaerophilic environment. Hitherto, many probiotic Bifidobacteria have shown beneficial effects on humans or animals, e.g., antiinfection, anti-depression, regulating the host immune system, and facilitating host nutrition adsorption (Figure 1).

Furthermore, some probiotic Bifidobacteria are engineered to include other beneficial cellular functionalities and/or remove the disadvantageous properties. Herein, we provide a review of the various findings of Bifidobacterium probiotics’ therapeutic functions, metabolic pathways, and methods to engineer them. This review would provide readers with a better understanding of the beneficial functions of Bifidobacterium probiotics, including the genetically engineered strains.

Antiinfection Activity

One prerequisite for becoming a probiotic strain is the capability of colonizing at a specific location, e.g., in the gastrointestinal tract, such that the probiotic strain can interact effectively with the host and the host microbiome. The colonization of probiotics outcompetes some pathogens and thus confers the host some protection against pathogenic infections. Various studies demonstrated that different species of Bifidobacteria exert antiinfection properties (Table 1). B. longum ATCC 15708 showed antimicrobial activity against many pathogens, including Escherichia coli O157:H7 ATTC 35150, Salmonella typhimurium ATTC 13311 and Listeria monocytogenes ATTC 19115. B. longum BB536 protects against gut-derived sepsis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, likely through interfering with the adherence of pathogens to intestinal epithelial cells; BB536 ameliorates the upper respiratory infections in healthy pre-school children probably through modulating gut microbiota, i.e., increasing the abundance of the genus Faecalibacterium; also, another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial reveals that administration of BB536 in combination with the standard triple therapy (esomeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin) improves the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection in 63 patients. The administration of B. lactis BB-12 in early childhood reduces respiratory tract infections. An administration of 5 billion colony-forming units of BB-12 twice a day for 1.5 years observed improved resistance to respiratory tract infections and low rates of developing fever throughout the infant’s growth period. B. animalis AHC7 was found to protect mice against S. typhimurium infection and prevent acute diarrhoea in dogs. The underlying mechanisms of the acute diarrhoea prevention of B. animalis AHC7 are due to the attenuation of proinflammatory transcription factor activation in response to infection. Bifidobacteria are also used in displacing latent and chronic infectious strains. For instance, B. longum ATCC 15707 can prevent Clostridium difficile-infection, while B. longum 51A confers protection against Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced lung infection. This protection conferred by B. longum 51A is due to the activation of the Toll-like receptor-signaling pathway, resulting in reactive oxygen species production. Similarly, B. longum 51A was found to reduce the Giardia-parasitic load in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus), making this strain a suitable prophylactic and therapeutic probiotic for promoting human and animal health.

Additionally, multi-strain or multi-species probiotic formulations have greater efficacy in fighting infections compared to single strain administration due to the complementary or even synergistic effects of the multi-strain/species formulation. A combination of B. longum subsp. infantis CECT 7210 and B. animalis subsp. lactis BPL6 enhances gut health and ameliorates S. typhimurium-infection in the porcine model. A mixture of B. longum BB536 and L. rhamnosus HN001 significantly reduced potentially harmful bacteria and enriched beneficial ones in the gut microbiota. A cocktail of probiotic Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria showed antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities against multidrug-resistant E. coli, and pretreatment with yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 or B. lactis BB-12 suppresses H. pylori infections effectively in humans. A fermented formula containing B. breve c50 and Streptococcus thermophilus 065 reduces the severity of acute diarrhea among healthy young infants.

Aside from the common protection against pathogenic bacteria, Bifidobacteria also exhibit antiviral activities. For example, B. adolescentis SPM1605 inhibits human enterovirus Coxsackievirus B3, thus preventing the virus infection-related acute heart failure and aseptic meningitis; B. longum IBG inhibits infection by rotavirus in vitro and decreases the duration of diarrhoea in pediatric patients.

Anticancer Activity

Probiotics have been employed to prevent and treat cancers for decades, where Bifidobacteria can effectively inhibit cancers in animal models. As an example, dietary supplementation of B. longum BB-536 significantly inhibits the 2-amino-3-methylimidazo [4,5-f]quinoline (IQ)-induced incidence of the colon (100% inhibition) and liver (80% inhibition) tumours in male rats and suppresses the IQ-induced mammary carcinogenesis (50% inhibition) and liver carcinogenesis (27% inhibition) of female rats. B. longum BCRC 910051 prevents the development of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colonic tumorigenesis. An in vitro study shows that B. bifidum BGN4 inhibits the growth of several human colon cancer cell lines such as HT-29 and HCT-116.

Anti-inflammation

Inflammation is a physiological response generally triggered by damage to the living tissues. The inflammatory response is a defense mechanism that protects the host from infection and injury. Bifidobacteria colonize primarily in the oral cavity and intestinal tracts. They thus have been applied to suppress and prevent some oral and enteric inflammations including irritable bowel syndrome, intestinal barrier functions, and infant colic impairment. However, some strains also inhibit cutaneous inflammations, e.g., a mixture of B. breve M-16V and B. longum BB536 reduces the development of eczema and atopic dermatitis in infants.

Enteritis

An in vitro study shows that B. animalis MB5 protects intestinal Caco-2 cells from the inflammation-associated response by counteracting neutrophil migration and partly decreasing pathogen adhesion. Many animal studies also validate the anti-inflammatory potentials. For example, a combination of B. bifidum and B. longum was found to effectively prevent devastating necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in an animal model; B. adolescentis IM38 ameliorates high fat diet-induced colitis by inhibiting NF-κB activation and lipopolysaccharide production by gut microbiota; B. bifidum ATCC 29521 restores the colon mucus layer of mice with ulcerative colitis by modulating NF-κB signalling pathway and rebuilding the gut intestinal microbiome equilibrium. B. breve CECT7263 attenuates endothelial dysfunction by regulating the levels of acetate and trimethylamine produced by gut microbiota.

Human studies show that B. breve M-16V potentially protects infants from developing NEC. Mechanistic studies indicated that M-16V can promote early gut microbial colonization, thus regulating the host immunity and preventing the inflammatory response. The combination of 2 B. breve strains (BR03 and B632) coupled to a gluten-free diet has shown a positive effect on decreasing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α in children with celiac disease. A clinical study shows that the probiotics mixture containing B. bifidum BGN4, B. lactis AD011, L. acidophilus AD031 and L. casei IBS041 can effectively relieve irritable bowel syndrome. A synbiotic formula composing probiotics (B. breve and L. casei) and the prebiotics galactooligosaccharides improved the intestinal absorptive function and motility of patients with short bowel syndrome. The combination of B. breve Yakult and L. casei Shirota can prevent infant enterocolitis, reduce NEC incidence and improve intestinal motility in infants. An open-label pilot study revealed that the administration of B. longum BB536 effectively induced remission of patients with ulcerative colitis. Three B. breve strains and a B. longum strain show potential in treating enteric disorders in newborns such as infantile colics.

Lactose Intolerance

Lactose intolerance occurs in patients that produce insufficient lactase in the small intestine to digest dietary lactose, usually derived from dairy food. Undigested lactose flows into the colon, where the lactose is catabolized by the gut microbes, triggering the lactose intolerance symptoms, including diarrhoea, flatulence, nausea, stomach cramps, and vomiting. B. animalis subsp. animalis IM386 ameliorates diarrhoea and flatulence in lactose-intolerant individuals because it facilitates lactose degradation in the small intestines. Mixed probiotics containing B. animalis subsp. animalis IM386 and L. plantarum MP2026 also alleviated some gastrointestinal symptoms in lactose-intolerant subjects.

Constipation

Constipation usually results from changes in diet or inadequate intake of fibre, where treatment using a multi-component probiotics formula consisting of B. bifidum, B. infantis, B. longum, L. casei, L. plantarum, and L. rhamnosus has positive effects on alleviating symptoms of constipation. B. longum W11 was also found to relieve the constipation symptoms of patients with irritable bowel syndrome, synergize with rifaximin as an adjuvant antibiotic treatment, and treat minimal hepatic encephalopathy.

Oral Inflammation

Aside from preventing enteric inflammations, Bifidobacteria show some inhibitory effects on oral inflammations. B. lactis DN-173010-fermented yogurt fed to patients elicit a positive effect on gingival inflammatory parameters because it can decrease both concentration and the total amount of IL-1β in gingival crevicular fluid. Oral administration of B. lactis HN019 as an adjunct potentiates the effects of scaling and root planing (SRP) in treating experimental periodontitis in rats and patients.

Promoting Psychological Health

Psychobiotics are a category of probiotics that confers mental health benefits, and many Bifidobacteria are functionally considered psychobiotics. Studies show that the gut microbiota of stress-resilient mice has lower Bifidobacteria than control and susceptible mice, and supplementation of Bifidobacteria to the susceptible mice significantly increased the resilience compared with vehicle-treated mice. These findings suggest that Bifidobacteria may confer resistance to stress. B. breve CCFM1025 showed antidepressant-like effect in chronically stressed mice due probably to the capacity of utilizing various carbohydrates and producing neuroactive metabolites, such as tryptophan, hypoxanthine, and nicotinate. B. breve CCFM1025 can also reverse chronic stress-induced depressive symptoms. B. adolescentis 150 shows anti-depression properties when fed to mice due to the ability to produce gamma-aminobutyric acid, a neurotransmitter inhibitor of the central nervous system. B. adolescentis NK98 alleviates anxiety/depression symptoms through regulating gut immune responses and microbiota composition. B. adolescentis IM38 can attenuate anxiety by regulating the benzodiazepine site of the GABAA receptor and modulating stress-related cytokine expression. B. longum 1714 reduces stress, anxiety and depression-related behaviours in anxious mice. The potential probiotic B. pseudocatenulatum CECT 7765 ameliorates depression comorbid with obesity via regulating endocrine and immune mediators of the gut-brain axis. B. breve 1,205 reduces general anxiety behaviours in mice. The combinatorial use of Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and B. longum R0175 has anxiolytic-like activity and reduces post-myocardial infarction depression symptoms in rats.

Various clinical trials have further supported these claims on the psychological health promotion effects. For instance, the oral administration of B. longum NCC3001 to depression patients reduces depression scores and alters patients’ brain activity. B. longum 1714™ was found to modulate brain activity by regulating resting neural activity and neural responses. B. longum 1714 modulates electrophysiology and neurocognition in healthy humans. The mixed probiotics of B. longum and L. helveticus significantly reduced the depressive symptoms of patients with Major Depression Disorder, presented beneficial psychological effects in healthy human volunteers, and decreased stress-induced gastrointestinal discomfort.

Decreasing Fat Accumulation

Obesity is a complex disease and increases the risk of other diseases and health problems, such as heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure and certain cancers. Some Bifidobacteria probiotics can reduce the host fat accumulation. B. lactis CECT 8145 reduces fat content and modulates lipid metabolism and antioxidant response in Caenorhabditis elegans. Another study using heat-treated B. lactis CECT8145 found an increased lean mass and ameliorated metabolic syndrome in cafeteria-fed obese rats. Similar studies using the same probiotic also show that administering either living or heat-treated B. lactis CECT8145 can reduce anthropometric adiposity biomarkers linked to changes in host immune system regulation and enrichment of Akkermansia genus in the gut of abdominally obese individuals. B. lactis 420 is another strain found to reduce fat mass and glucose intolerance in both obese and diabetic mice by reducing the translocation of gut microbes.

Facilitating the Host Nutrition Absorption

Consumption of probiotics has been reported to facilitate the absorption of nutrients, e.g., vitamins and calcium ions. B. longum BB536 can increase the abundance of nutrients including pimelate, biotin and butyrate, by facilitating the fermentation processes resulting from the microbial crosstalk between B. longum BB536 and human gut-derived microbiota. Additionally, B. pseudocatenulatum is commonly found in human faecal samples throughout their lifetime, where some of these strains have shown beneficial properties, such as the production of enterolignan, urolithin, and conjugated linoleic acid.

Promoting Bone Health

Osteoporosis, a common bone metabolic disorder caused by low bone mass and deterioration of the bone tissue, results in the individual being prone to fractures. Using probiotic B. longum ATCC 15707 or in combination with yacon flour can increase bone mass density by elevating the expression of Sparc and Bmp-2 genes. Additionally, B. adolescentis ATCC 15703 can modulate bone repair by dampening fracture-induced systemic inflammation, and the topical use of B. lactis HN019 promotes a protective effect against alveolar bone.

Regulating the Host Immune System

These probiotics can regulate the host immune system for the amelioration or prevention of diseases. B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 was found to protect murine pups and dams from exposure to food antigens by increasing total IgA and anti-β-lactoglobulin IgA levels in fecal extracts. B. breve ATCC 15700 suppresses the skewed T helper 2 pattern responses by promoting Treg development. B. animalis subsp. lactis HN019 can enhance natural immunity in healthy elderly subjects by increasing the anti-inflammatory cytokine IFN-α and phagocytic activity. HN019 also enhances several natural and acquired immunity indices in healthy mice, including NK-cell activity, IFN-γ production, antibody responses to antigens, and the phagocytic activity of peripheral blood leukocytes and macrophages. L. helveticus Bar13 and B. longum Bar33 can synergistically improve the physiologic status and immunity of older adults by increasing regulatory T (Treg and Tr1) cells and decreasing γδ T cells. In vitro studies show that B. bifidum BGN4 can activate differentiation of host macrophages and stimulate the production of IL-10 and IL-6. B. longum subsp. infantis CCUG 52486 shows strong immunomodulatory potential comparable with well-known commercial strains (e.g., B. longum SP 07/3, L. rhamnosus GG and L. casei Shirota) based on the IL-10/IL-12 ratios.

Other Beneficial Effects

A combination of B. longum BB536 and B. pseudocatenulatum G4 ameliorates cardiovascular symptoms by decreasing total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglyceride levels, malondialdehyde, and increasing HDL-cholesterol levels concentrations. A Bifidobacteria mixture of B. longum BB536, B. infantis M-63, and B. breve M-16 V prevents allergen pollen-induced rhinitis symptoms. B. lactis BB-12 alters the colonization of cariogenic bacteria, prevents dental caries and decreases plaque and gingival indexes. B. pseudocatenulatum CECT 7765 can restore the obesity-induced vascular dysfunction by reducing nitric oxide release and prevent gut-derived complications in experimental chronic liver disease via maintaining gut homeostasis. B. breve A1 exhibits therapeutic potential for preventing cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease model mice by suppressing the hippocampal expressions of amyloid-β-induced specific genes. While the studies on Bifidobacterium as probiotics may be considered extensive, it is inevitable that with the latest multi-omics approaches, more strains of Bifidobacteria and its numerous therapeutic activities are soon to be discovered in future with the advent of highly efficient isolation and determination methods.

Bifidobacterium Biochemical Properties and Currently Used Chassis for Genetic Engineering

The Gram-positive Bifidobacterium is an anaerobic branched rod-shaped actinobacterium often associated with symbiotic bacterial-host relationships with mammals, particularly humans. Given the anaerobic nature of the microbe, the natural microbial growth rate is relatively slower than their other counterparts in the microbiota. Thus, Bifidobacterium is usually administered at a high cell count to overwhelm the microbiota and displace the pathogens in the host to elicit its therapeutic properties.

Microbes from the Actinobacteria phyla, including Bifidobacterium, are generally recognized as natural product producers with the basic biochemical makeup for producing valuable metabolites used in pharmaceuticals, agricultural, environmental, and industrial applications. The use of Bifidobacterium as a chassis for genetic manipulation requires a better understanding of microbial biochemistry. Understanding the pathways regulating microbial behaviour in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering allows streamlining cellular processes to elicit the appropriate responses. These biochemical attributes include producing polyketides, short-chain fatty acids, conjugated linoleic acid, and metabolizing fructose, lactose, and cholesterol.

CoA Derivative Production

Bifidobacteria can be considered a powerful workhorse for producing polyketide products. This ability can be attributed to the Bifid shunt that can effectively produce more CoA derivatives than other conventional production methods of CoA derivatives. The acetyl-CoA, malonyl-CoA, and other CoA derivatives are the building blocks involved in the biosynthesis of polyketide, fatty acids, butanol, isoprenoids, and amino acids (Figure 2). Additionally, some Bifidobacteria can metabolize the byproducts and waste of the host body to produce a higher pool of CoA derivatives, providing these microbes with an additional edge in generating a larger pool of CoA derivatives for the biosynthesis of value-added chemicals. For instance, B. animalis subspecies lactis was found to degrade oxalate (a cellular byproduct secreted by the host cells in the amino acid metabolism), providing the microbe with a higher pool of oxalyl CoA while reducing the risk of oxalate toxicity to the host. There have been efforts to use these probiotic strains to treat patients with weak kidney functions and at high risk of developing kidney stones. Another study investigating the role of Bifidobacteria in producing short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) further revealed that these microbes could metabolize complex sugar such as glucomannan to produce higher pools of SCFA, including lactic, acetic, propionic, and butyric acid.

The produced CoA derivatives are used to produce secondary metabolites by modular enzymes encoded in the Bifidobacterium gene (Figure 2). The gene sequences of various Bifidobacterium revealed several polyketide synthase (PKS) gene clusters, including those from the Type 1 and Type 3 PKSs. A study comparing the Bifidobacteria isolated from humans and marmosets showed that Type 1 PKS was conserved across Bifidobacteria, including B. myosotis, B. reuteri, B. breve, B. longum, B. tissieri, B. bifidum, and B. callitrichos. Closer investigation on the metabolomics of B. breve UCC2003 showed that under the presence of high bile salt concentrations, the Bifidobacteria reverts to the sessile biofilm state through the expression of polyketide synthase Bbr_0,204/0,205. The study hypothesized the role of PKS in the microbe’s adaptive behaviour in the presence of bile salts.

Like polyketide production, the SCFAs, medium-chain fatty acid (MCFA), and fatty acid ethyl esters are produced through the fermentation of complex sugars in Bifidobacteria to generate the various CoA-derivatives (Figure 2). These SCFAs produced include butyrate, propionate, and so forth that play an essential role in host health, including boosting the metabolism and reducing the risk of developing diabetes. These SCFAs are generated as a byproduct of the Bifid shunt and can be used for the biosynthesis of MCFA using a homologous protein to polyketide synthases, known as fatty acid synthase (FAS). FASs are modular enzymatic proteins that catalyze the CoA derivatives to produce the various fatty acids.

Thus, it is evident that the presence of the Bifid shunt and the various metabolic processes within Bifidobacterium strains provides the necessary metabolic precursors needed for engineering PKS, FAS and other CoA related pathways. This unique characteristic facilitates the biosynthesis of value-added compounds through the use of multi-domain modular enzymes. So far, there has been no reported use of Bifidobacterium in the bioproduction of polyketides or fatty acids due to the limited gene engineering tools. However, leveraging this attribute would help improve the productivity of the bioconversion (the substrate/product ratio).

Conjugated Linoleic Acid

Many Bifidobacteria are natural producers of conjugated linoleic acids (CLA), resulting from the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid (LA) and other unsaturated fatty acids (Figure 2). The first reported strain that produces CLA is B. breve with a 66% endpoint conversion, where the converted LA to CLA was secreted into the surrounding medium. Other strains showing a similar ability to convert LA to CLA includes B. infantis, B. dentium, B. catenulatum and B. pseudocatenatalum. The biosynthesis of CLA from LA involves a three-step process, relying on LA isomerase enzymes, direct reduction of the unstable variant, and delta-9 desaturase enzyme. While CLA is directly linked to many health benefits, the CLA is a preferred substrate for producing nitrated fatty acids. The various CLA health benefits include anti-inflammation, antiinfection, anticancer, and increasing host metabolism. On the other hand, nitro-fatty acids are often used as an agent to reduce blood pressure and prevent inflammation and other fibrotic diseases. The natural ability of Bifidobacterium to convert and produce CLA generates a perpetual pool of CLA for the biosynthesis of nitro-fatty acids and their B. animalis subsp. lactis various derivatives.

Fructose and Lactose Metabolism

Fructose is often linked to various metabolic and heart diseases, where increased dietary levels of fructose are linked to an increased risk of intestinal inflammation. Thus, probiotic strains that can absorb and utilize fructose as a carbon source is considerably preferred. Conversely, various Bifidobacterium strains have been shown to possess fructokinase (fructose phosphotransferase) activity, crucial for fructose metabolism (Figure 2). The phosphorylated fructose (fructose-1-phosphate) is then assimilated into the Bifid shunt to increase CoA derivatives production. This fructokinase activity is encoded by the fruA gene in B. breve UCC2003 that is homologous to the EIIBCA gene of the phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system of B. longum NCC2705. Both the encoded FruA and EIIBCA are known to play an integral part in the breakdown and assimilation of fructose.

Similarly, many people suffer from lactose intolerance, where symptoms can range from mild indigestion to severe water loss and malnutrition. To this extent, the ability of Bifidobacterium to metabolize lactose can be considered as a potential health benefiting property. Additionally, lactose utilization should not produce biochemicals that are toxic to the human host. Interestingly, studies have shown that Bifidobacterium has a higher preference for lactose than other simple sugars like glucose. For instance, in B. longum NCC2705, the gene glcP, a putative glucose transporter, showed that the presence of lactose reduces the influx of glucose into the Bifidobacterial cytosol conferring a preference to lactose instead. Additionally, studies using B. bifidum indicate that the microbe presents some lactase activity in a slightly acidic environment within the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in the breakdown of lactose to glucose and galactose that are then assimilated into the Bifid shunt.

Similar to the observations discussed earlier, the intake of the various sugars fructose and lactose is highly dependent on the concentrations of other sugars in the surrounding environment. The synergistic interactions of the various sugars result in a change in the preference of certain sugar types that enters the Bifid shunt. In some instances, such as in B. adolescentis MB239, the Bifidobacterium prefers the uptake of fructose and lactose depending on other types of sugars where the studies suggest some form of synergistic interactions between the sugars.

Strain Optimization of Bifidobacterium

However, not all strains of Bifidobacterium have the desired properties of being a probiotic strain. A probiotic strain needs several attributes, including the ability to survive the human host environment and provide host-benefiting properties while showing no pathogenicity to the host. The following subsection discusses the limitations of using Bifidobacterium as an engineering chassis and methods of circumventing these limitations.

Bile Salt Intolerance

Some studies found that certain Bifidobacterium could not survive in the presence of bile salt due to the lack of conjugated bile salt hydrolase activity. In particular, the presence of glycoconjugate bile salt such as glycodeoxycholic acid presents higher toxicity to Bifidobacterium under an acidic environment. A study concluded that the susceptibility of Bifidobacteria to the glycoconjugated bile salt is dependent on the conjugated bile salt hydrolase activity (CSBH). The presence of glycodeoxycholic and taurodeoxycholic acids was found to interfere with the survivability of the B. animalis ATCC25527, B. breve ATCC15700, B. longum ATCC15707 and B. coryneforme under lower pH conditions. These bile salt-sensitive Bifidobacteria are either CBSH or lacking the deconjugating properties, where either one of the two properties allows the Bifidobacteria to protonate and deconjugate the bile salt prior to export to the surrounding. Currently, many variants of Bifidobacteria naturally resistant to bile salts are considered good engineering chassis. However, should there be a need to develop a novel strain of Bifidobacterium that does not have the bile salt tolerance, engineering these microbes to have CSBH activities can be considered an excellent strategy to engineer the microbial cell.

Mucin Degrading Bifidobacterium

The mucin layer forms a protective barrier system crucial for preventing the adhesion and penetration of pathogens, toxins, and other damaging agents in the gut. The mucin layer comprises highly glycosylated O-linked glycoproteins secreted primarily by the exocrine glands and mucosa. The protection conferred by the mucin layer is attributed to the glycoprotein structure within the mucus layer that retains a large body of water (>95%), where the retain water forms a reservoir of electrolytes, antibodies, and nucleic acids. Mucin degradation is commonly facilitated by mucolytic taxa such as those from the Bacteroides that carries a large variety of enzymes, including proteases, sulfatases, fucosidases, neuramidases, β-galactosidases, α-N-acetylgalactosaminidases, α-N-acetylglucosaminidases, and exo/endo-β-N-acetyl-glucosamindases. Moreover, the depleted mucin layers might result in the translocation of the gut microflora and other toxins across the exposed gut lining tissues. Several intestinal Bifidobacterium isolates can degrade the mucin as a form of sustenance through endo-α-N-acetylgalatosaminidase and 1,2-α-fucosidase. A study conducted on 22 different Bifidobacterium strains isolated from the human host found that most B. longum and B. bifidum isolates can break down the mucin layers in the host gut. Conversely, the use of non-mucin degrading variants of Bifidobacterium such as B. longum subsp. infantis EVC001 showed that the probiotic strain prevents colonic mucin degradation in breastfed infants. This characteristic of the probiotic strain is due to the displacement of other mucin-degrading Bacteroides population. While there is limited proof to support the adverse effects of mucin-degrading Bifidobacterium, it is preferable that the engineered Bifidobacterium does not have the mucin-degrading capabilities as it would be deemed safer for consumption. The selection of Bifidobacterium as a suitable engineering host could leverage on naturally occurring Bifidobacteria or through knockout of the corresponding mucin-degrading genes.

Current Bifidobacterium Used as Engineering Chassis

Numerous studies have used Bifidobacterium as an engineering chassis, mainly to respond to various environmental triggers. These engineered Bifidobacterium have been designed to facilitate various roles, such as biosensing, treatment of diseases or improved bioprocessing. Other approaches have been used mainly to elucidate the Bifidobacterium cellular function and improve microbial tolerance and survivability in the environment. An example of conventional Bifidobacterium engineering chassis is B. breve UCC 2003, which was used for improving tolerance to bile salt and survival under the gastrointestinal tract physiological environment. This improved tolerance was achieved by expressing the Listeria monocytogenes bile resistance gene, BilE. A similar Bifidobacterium was engineered to sense tumours and set the stage for later anticancer treatment using the microbial cell line. Another commonly used strain of Bifidobacterium is the B. longum 105-A that was previously used in investigating the inducible and constitutive promoters. The isolated promoter sequences were reintroduced into B. longum 105-A with the α-galatosidase reporter gene. This particular strain is easier to manipulate compared to other variants of Bifidobacterium due to the higher transformation efficiency used primarily in knocking out/down genes for closer study of the biochemical pathway. Similar to B. breve UCC 2003, B. longum 105-A was also used in improving its tolerance to oxidative stress through the expression of the katE catalase gene isolated from Bacillus subtilis. Another study used a similar approach to confer oxidative stress tolerance in B. thermophilum RBL67 through transferring the B. longum gene bl_1,404. The various Bifidobacterium used as an engineering chassis, their culture collection bank, and their source are described in Table 2.

Types of Genetic Regulatory Tools

Genetic tools used to regulate the Bifidobacterial gene expression could be generally divided into the promoters, ribosomal binding sites (RBS), and terminator sequence. The various elements regulating gene expression will be discussed in the following sections. These various elements can be used individually or concertedly to optimize the regulated microbial function.

Promoter Sequences for Heterologous Gene Expression

Promoters are gene sequences that recruit the RNA polymerase to trigger mRNA transcription for downstream cellular processes. These sequences are located upstream of the coding region, including the ribosomal binding site and the gene sequences. The naturally occurring promoter sequences contains promoter core motifs located at the -35 to -10 region from the start of the coding sequence. These sequences conventionally contain the TTGNNN and the TANNNT conserved sequences respectively.

Promoter sequences are generally divided into two categories, namely the constitutive promoters and the inducible promoters. Constitutive promoters piggyback on the cellular metabolic function of the Bifidobacterium, facilitating a gene expression depending on the microbial metabolism. On the other hand, inducible promoters often carry a repressor/activator protein that binds on the operator site at either side of the -35 sequence. The repressor protein will bind on the operator site, inhibiting the recruitment of the RNA polymerase complex. In the presence of the corresponding ligand, binding of the ligand to the repressor causes conformational changes triggering the release from the operator site. On the other hand, activators will bind on the operator site after binding to the target ligand, facilitating the recruitment of the RNA polymerase complex.

Various constitutive promoters for Bifidobacterium expression were developed by sifting through the gene sequences within the Bifidobacterium genome. The promoter core motif sequences were identified in silico using the hidden Markov model on the upstream sequences of the transcriptional start site of various coding genes in Bifidobacterium. This approach was used to identify the various putative constitutive promoter sequences in B. longum NCC2705 and B. longum 105-A. Additionally, the space between the -35 and -10 sequences can range from 11 to 18 nucleotides in length, where a shorter space length was found to improve the transcription levels.

Inducible expression within Bifidobacterium is mainly linked to the sugar-related inducers that are linked to the Bifid shunt. Some of these promoters were found to function in other microbes, whereas others were specific to Bifidobacterium. Methods of identifying these inducible promoters are through transcriptomic analysis of genes that are upregulated in the presence of the inducer molecules, where through annotating the upregulated genes, the corresponding promoter region is investigated. This approach identified sucrose and raffinose inducible promoters from B. lactis and B. longum NCC2705. Another example would be using the pNZ8048 nisin inducible promoter initially used for expression within Lactobacillus. In a similar study, the elongation factor Tu from B. longum subsp. infantis ATCC15697 was used for stable anaerobic expression of green fluorescent protein in both B. longum Reuter 1963 CECT4551 and B. breve INIA P734.

In order to facilitate a better understanding of the various working promoters and the −35 and −10 sequences, Table 3 provides the information of the various types of promoters, the source plasmids, sequence origin and the promoter motifs.

Ribosomal Binding Site Sequence Optimization Protein Translation

In the efforts to optimize the RBS for efficient protein, two primary considerations are taken into account. First, the flanking sequences of the RBS site influence the recruitment of the ribosomal subunits to the mRNA sequences. Second, the optimal distance between the RBS site and the start codon influences the rate of protein expression. Interestingly, certain studies have shown that the predominant conserved Shine-Dalgarno sequence in Bifidobacterium differs from conventional microbes where the most common of 6-mer consensus RBS in B. longum is AAGGAG as compared to the common AGGAGG. Additionally, the space between the RBS and the start codon was found to be optimal at 5 nucleotides apart, where fewer than 5 nucleotides apart result in translation repression. While 5 nucleotides space showed the best expression outcome, changes in expression level were minimal when the RBS is 6–9 nucleotides from the start codon.

Terminator Sequence Selection for Terminating Transcription Processes

In investigating the various terminators used in Bifidobacterium, the gene sequences were identified using WebGeSTer DB terminator database. These include the canonical (L-shaped hairpin structure) and non-canonical (I-, U-, V-, and X-shaped hairpin structures) terminators used across different phyla of microorganisms. Other approaches rely on pre-existing terminator sequences found in the Bifidobacterial genome.

Applications of Engineered Bifidobacteria

Although wild-type Bifidobacteria have exhibited many therapeutic applications in treating diseases (Section 1), they are endowed with more functions via synthetic biology tools such as integrating new pathways or modifying the original metabolic pathways. These engineered Bifidobacteria are wildly applied to treat inflammatory diseases. For example, B. longum HB15 expressing α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) was used to combat ulcerative colitis. α-MSH is a tridecapeptide that exhibits anti-inflammatory properties by regulating the production of inflammatory mediators. B. longum NCC2705 expressing interleukin-12 was used to treat Coxsackie virus B3-induced myocarditis in mice. The oral administration of B. longum NCC 2705 expressing oxyntomodulin can reduce food intake, body weight and plasma lipid level in overweight mice. Oxyntomodulin is a gut hormone that reduces food intake and body weight. B. longum HB25 expressing the antibacterial peptide LL-37 was used for treating bacterial diarrhea.

Additionally, since Bifidobacteria can germinate and proliferate in the hypoxic regions of solid tumors, Bifidobacteria are currently widely applied as an in situ delivery and production of various anticancer agents for treating tumors. For example, B. longum 105-A was used to deliver cytosine deaminase that catalytically converts the non-toxic prodrug 5-fluorocytosine to the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil, to the rat mammary tumors or mice metastatic breast tumors. A similar approach using B. breve I-53-8w was used to deliver cytosine deaminase to mice lung cancer tumors. Other approaches uses B. longum NCC2705 to express tumstatin protein (a powerful angiostatin that inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of tumorous vascular endothelial cells), used as an antitumor therapy in tumor-bearing mice.

Summary and Future Perspective

Bifidobacterium is considered a vital composition of the probiotic mix that essentially has various health benefiting properties when administered at the appropriate dosage. The commercial use of the various types of these probiotics have been found to exert various therapeutic properties including antiinfection, antiinflammation, anticancer, promoting host psychological and physical health, and regulating host immune system.

On the other hand, given the nature of Bifidobacteria and their natural biochemical properties, the microbe presents a suitable host for cellular engineering. The engineering of Bifidobacterium can facilitate the increased bioproduction of value-added chemicals while consuming lesser resources compared to other microbial workhorses. One of the vital biochemical processes is the Bifid shunt that produces higher CoA precursors for the bioproduction of polyketide products and fatty acid biosynthesis. On top of this, the probiotic microbe readily consumes other forms of sugars that further expands the ability of the microbial cell to function as a microbial cell factory. Additionally, with the natural ability of the microbe to produce conjugated linoleic acids, the microbe can be used in general to produce nitro-fatty acids that have recently been gaining interest as a potential treatment for metabolic diseases. Furthermore, coupled to the natural therapeutic properties of the microbial cell, the use of Bifidobacteria as an engineering chassis presents an interesting alternative for metabolic engineers, synthetic biologists, and evolutionary biologists to develop in-situ treatment of various ailments in the human host.

However, as earlier discussed, not all Bifidobacterium is considered a probiotic strain due to the lack of microbial resistance to the harsh environment within the human host. Further, some of the microbes are considered unsuited for use as a probiotic owing to the microbe’s ability to break down the host mucin layers. The mucin layer essentially functions as a protective layer within the human host, preventing the infiltration of other pathogens and the absorption of toxic compounds by the human host. Thus, to increase the list of engineerable Bifidobacterium, supplementing or removing certain genes would help develop better-suited probiotics for the human host.

Current known Bifidobacterium chassis and gene tools are limited, hampering the progress of developing engineering Bifidobacterium. Currently, most engineering efforts of Bifidobacterium are centred on B. longum and B. breve, with a few exceptions of other suitable microbial chassis. Additionally, various constitutive and inducible promoters were identified that were directly isolated from the Bifidobacterial genome. Interestingly, these gene promoters were functional in other microbial chassis such as Bacillus and Escherichia coli. The current inducible promoters used in Bifidobacterial engineering use sugar complexes as inducers to trigger genes regulated in the Bifid shunt pathway.

While the current studies show promise of further developing Bifidobacterium as an engineering host, there is an increasing need for identifying more genetic tools that are better suited for detecting and responding to the various triggers in the host body. These efforts include identifying various regulatory elements from the pre-existing Bifidobacterial genome sequences and other closely related microbial species from the Actinobacterial taxa. Furthermore, the role of these engineered Bifidobacteria in the host-microbiome is scarcely studied and would require further investigation to better understand the impact and safety of using these microbes to treat diseases in the future.

References 159

  1. 1.

    Abdelhamid A. G. Esaam A. Hazaa M. M. (2018 ). Cell Free Preparations of Probiotics Exerted Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities against Multidrug Resistant E. coli. Saudi Pharm. J. 26, 603–607.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsps.2018.03.004 (opens in a new tab)

  2. 2.

    Abe F. Muto M. Yaeshima T. Iwatsuki K. Aihara H. Ohashi Y. (2010 ). Safety Evaluation of Probiotic Bifidobacteria by Analysis of Mucin Degradation Activity and Translocation Ability. Anaerobe 16, 131–136.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.07.006 (opens in a new tab)

  3. 3.

    Agusti A. Moya-Pérez A. Campillo I. Montserrat-De La Paz S. Cerrudo V. Perez-Villalba A. (2018 ). Bifidobacterium Pseudocatenulatum CECT 7765 Ameliorates Neuroendocrine Alterations Associated with an Exaggerated Stress Response and Anhedonia in Obese Mice. Mol. Neurobiol. 55, 5337–5352.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12035-017-0768-z (opens in a new tab)

  4. 4.

    Al-Sheraji S. H. Ismail A. Manap M. Y. Mustafa S. Yusof R. M. Hassan F. A. (2012 ). Hypocholesterolaemic Effect of Yoghurt Containing Bifidobacterium Pseudocatenulatum G4 or Bifidobacterium Longum BB536. Food Chem. 135, 356–361.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.120 (opens in a new tab)

  5. 5.
  6. 6.

    Aloisio I. Santini C. Biavati B. Dinelli G. Cencič A. Chingwaru W. (2012 ). Characterization of Bifidobacterium Spp. Strains for the Treatment of Enteric Disorders in Newborns. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 96, 1561–1576.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-012-4138-5 (opens in a new tab)

  7. 7.

    Amaretti A. Tamburini E. Bernardi T. Pompei A. Zanoni S. Vaccari G. (2006 ). Substrate Preference of Bifidobacterium Adolescentis MB 239: Compared Growth on Single and Mixed Carbohydrates. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 73, 654–662.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-006-0500-9 (opens in a new tab)

  8. 8.

    Arseneault-Bréard J. Rondeau I. Gilbert K. Girard S.-A. Tompkins T. A. Godbout R. (2012 ). Combination of Lactobacillus Helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium Longum R0175 Reduces post-myocardial Infarction Depression Symptoms and Restores Intestinal Permeability in a Rat Model. Br. J. Nutr. 107, 1793–1799.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0007114511005137 (opens in a new tab)

  9. 9.

    Arunachalam K. Gill H. Chandra R. (2000 ). Enhancement of Natural Immune Function by Dietary Consumption of Bifidobacterium Lactis (HN019). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 54, 263–267.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600938 (opens in a new tab)

  10. 10.

    Ballini A. Gnoni A. De Vito D. Dipalma G. Cantore S. Gargiulo Isacco C. (2019 ). Effect of Probiotics on the Occurrence of Nutrition Absorption Capacities in Healthy Children: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 23, 8645–8657.

    Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_201910_19182 (opens in a new tab)

  11. 11.

    Barba-Vidal E. Castillejos L. Roll V. F. B. Cifuentes-Orjuela G. Moreno Muñoz J. A. Martín-Orúe S. M. (2017 ). The Probiotic Combination of Bifidobacterium Longum Subsp. Infantis CECT 7210 and Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis BPL6 Reduces Pathogen Loads and Improves Gut Health of Weaned Piglets Orally Challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1570.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2017.01570 (opens in a new tab)

  12. 12.
  13. 13.

    Bonacci G. Baker P. R. S. Salvatore S. R. Shores D. Khoo N. K. H. Koenitzer J. R. (2012 ). Conjugated Linoleic Acid Is a Preferential Substrate for Fatty Acid Nitration. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 44071–44082.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.401356 (opens in a new tab)

  14. 14.

    Bongers M. E. J. van Wijk M. P. Reitsma J. B. Benninga M. A. (2010 ). Long-term Prognosis for Childhood Constipation: Clinical Outcomes in Adulthood. Pediatrics 126, e156–e162.

    Not in our library10.1542/peds.2009-1009 (opens in a new tab)

  15. 15.

    Botic T. Klingberg T. Weingartl H. Cencic A. (2007 ). A Novel Eukaryotic Cell Culture Model to Study Antiviral Activity of Potential Probiotic Bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 115, 227–234.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.044 (opens in a new tab)

  16. 16.

    Braga T. D. da Silva G. A. P. de Lira P. I. C. de Carvalho Lima M. (2011 ). Efficacy of Bifidobacterium Breve and Lactobacillus Casei Oral Supplementation on Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Preterm Infants: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 93, 81–86.

    Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.2010.29799 (opens in a new tab)

  17. 17.

    Brown C. J. Mtui D. Oswald B. P. Van Leuven J. T. Vallender E. J. Schultz-Darken N. (2019 ). Comparative Genomics of Bifidobacterium Species Isolated from Marmosets and Humans. Am. J. Primatol 81, e983.

    Not in our library10.1002/ajp.22983 (opens in a new tab)

  18. 18.

    Çaglar E. Onder Kuscu O. Selvi Kuvvetli S. Kavaloglu Cildir S. Sandalli N. Twetman S. (2008 ). Short-term Effect of Ice-Cream containingBifidobacterium lactisBb-12 on the Number of Salivary Mutans Streptococci and Lactobacilli. Acta Odontologica Scand. 66, 154–158.

    Not in our library10.1080/00016350802089467 (opens in a new tab)

  19. 19.

    Caimari A. del Bas J. M. Boqué N. Crescenti A. Puiggròs F. Chenoll E. (2017 ). Heat-killed Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis CECT 8145 Increases Lean Mass and Ameliorates Metabolic Syndrome in Cafeteria-Fed Obese Rats. J. Funct. Foods 38, 251–263.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jff.2017.09.029 (opens in a new tab)

  20. 20.

    Chapman C. M. C. Gibson G. R. Rowland I. (2011 ). Health Benefits of Probiotics: Are Mixtures More Effective Than Single Strains? Eur. J. Nutr. 50, 1–17.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00394-010-0166-z (opens in a new tab)

  21. 21.

    Chitapanarux T. Thongsawat S. Pisespongsa P. Leerapun A. Kijdamrongthum P. (2015 ). Effect of Bifidobacterium Longum on PPI-Based Triple Therapy for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. J. Funct. Foods 13, 289–294.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jff.2015.01.003 (opens in a new tab)

  22. 22.

    Coakley M. Ross R. P. Nordgren M. Fitzgerald G. Devery R. Stanton C. (2003 ). Conjugated Linoleic Acid Biosynthesis by Human-Derived Bifidobacterium Species. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94, 138–145.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01814.x (opens in a new tab)

  23. 23.

    Colbère-Garapin F. Martin-Latil S. Blondel B. Mousson L. Pelletier I. Autret A. (2007 ). Prevention and Treatment of Enteric Viral Infections: Possible Benefits of Probiotic Bacteria. Microbes Infect. 9, 1623–1631.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.micinf.2007.09.016 (opens in a new tab)

  24. 24.

    Collado M. C. Meriluoto J. Salminen S. (2007 ). Development of New Probiotics by Strain Combinations: Is it Possible to Improve the Adhesion to Intestinal Mucus? J. Dairy Sci. 90, 2710–2716.

    Not in our library10.3168/jds.2006-456 (opens in a new tab)

  25. 25.

    Cronin M. Akin A. R. Collins S. A. Meganck J. Kim J.-B. Baban C. K. (2012 ). High Resolution In Vivo Bioluminescent Imaging for the Study of Bacterial Tumour Targeting. PLoS One 7, e30940.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0030940 (opens in a new tab)

  26. 26.

    Cronin M. Morrissey D. Rajendran S. El Mashad S. M. Van Sinderen D. O'sullivan G. C. (2010 ). Orally Administered Bifidobacteria as Vehicles for Delivery of Agents to Systemic Tumors. Mol. Ther. 18, 1397–1407.

    Not in our library10.1038/mt.2010.59 (opens in a new tab)

  27. 27.

    Di Pierro F. Pane M. (2021 ). Bifidobacterium Longum W11: Uniqueness and Individual or Combined Clinical Use in Association with Rifaximin. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 42, 15–21.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.12.025 (opens in a new tab)

  28. 28.

    Din A. U. Hassan A. Zhu Y. Zhang K. Wang Y. Li T. (2020 ). Inhibitory Effect of Bifidobacterium Bifidum ATCC 29521 on Colitis and its Mechanism. J. Nutr. Biochem. 79, 108353.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108353 (opens in a new tab)

  29. 29.

    Dinan T. G. Stanton C. Cryan J. F. (2013 ). Psychobiotics: A Novel Class of Psychotropic. Biol. Psychiatry 74, 720–726.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.001 (opens in a new tab)

  30. 30.

    Enomoto T. Sowa M. Nishimori K. Shimazu S. Yoshida A. Yamada K. (2014 ). Effects of Bifidobacterial Supplementation to Pregnant Women and Infants in the Prevention of Allergy Development in Infants and on Fecal Microbiota. Allergol. Int. 63, 575–585.

    Not in our library10.2332/allergolint.13-oa-0683 (opens in a new tab)

  31. 31.

    Finamore A. Roselli M. Donini L. Brasili D. E. Rami R. Carnevali P. (2019 ). Supplementation with Bifidobacterium Longum Bar33 and Lactobacillus Helveticus Bar13 Mixture Improves Immunity in Elderly Humans (Over 75 years) and Aged Mice. Nutrition 63-64, 184–192.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nut.2019.02.005 (opens in a new tab)

  32. 32.

    Fonseca J. F. Alvim L. B. Nunes Á. C. Oliveira F. M. S. Amaral R. S. Caliari M. V. (2019 ). Probiotic Effect of Bifidobacterium Longum 5 1A and Weissella Paramesenteroides WpK4 on Gerbils Infected with Giardia Lamblia. J. Appl. Microbiol. 127, 1184–1191.

    Not in our library10.1111/jam.14338 (opens in a new tab)

  33. 33.

    Foo N.-P. Ou Yang H. Chiu H.-H. Chan H.-Y. Liao C.-C. Yu C.-K. (2011 ). Probiotics Prevent the Development of 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine (DMH)-Induced Colonic Tumorigenesis through Suppressed Colonic Mucosa Cellular Proliferation and Increased Stimulation of Macrophages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 13337–13345.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf203444d (opens in a new tab)

  34. 34.

    Fujimori M. (2006 ). Genetically Engineeredbifidobacterium as a Drug Delivery System for Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients. Breast cancer 13, 27–31.

    Not in our library10.2325/jbcs.13.27 (opens in a new tab)

  35. 35.

    Fukiya S. Sakanaka M. Yokota A. (2018 ). “Genetic Manipulation and Gene Modification Technologies in Bifidobacteria,” in The Bifidobacteria and Related Organisms. Editor Mattarelli P. (Academic Press), 243–259.

    Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-805060-6.00015-6 (opens in a new tab)

  36. 36.

    Fukushima Y. Kawata Y. Mizumachi K. Kurisaki J.-i. Mitsuoka T. (1999 ). Effect of Bifidobacteria Feeding on Fecal flora and Production of Immunoglobulins in Lactating Mouse. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 46, 193–197.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00183-4 (opens in a new tab)

  37. 37.
  38. 38.

    Gaya P. Peirotén Á. Medina M. Álvarez I. Landete J. M. (2018 ). Bifidobacterium Pseudocatenulatum INIA P815: the First Bacterium Able to Produce Urolithins A and B from Ellagic Acid. J. Funct. Foods 45, 95–99.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jff.2018.03.040 (opens in a new tab)

  39. 39.

    Gill H. S. Rutherfurd K. J. Prasad J. Gopal P. K. (2000 ). Enhancement of Natural and Acquired Immunity byLactobacillus rhamnosus(HN001),Lactobacillus acidophilus(HN017) and Bifidobacterium lactis(HN019). Br. J. Nutr. 83, 167–176.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0007114500000210 (opens in a new tab)

  40. 40.

    Grill J. P. Perrin S. Schneider F. (2000 ). Bile Salt Toxicity to Some Bifidobacteria Strains: Role of Conjugated Bile Salt Hydrolase and pH. Can. J. Microbiol. 46, 878–884.

    Not in our library10.1139/w00-066 (opens in a new tab)

All 159 references

Questions about this paper

We email you if it is retracted, withdrawn, corrected or flagged.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.