No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.
Metabolism Characteristics of Lactic Acid Bacteria and the Expanding Applications in Food Industry
Yaqi Wang, Jiangtao Wu, Mengxin Lv and 7 more
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · 2021 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria are a kind of microorganisms that can ferment carbohydrates to produce lactic acid, and are currently widely used in the fermented food industry. In recent years, with the excellent role of lactic acid bacteria in the food industry and probiotic functions, their microbial metabolic characteristics have also attracted more attention. Lactic acid bacteria can decompose macromolecular substances in food, including degradation of indigestible polysaccharides and transformation of undesirable flavor substances. Meanwhile, they can also produce a variety of products including short-chain fatty acids, amines, bacteriocins, vitamins and exopolysaccharides during metabolism. Based on the above-mentioned metabolic characteristics, lactic acid bacteria have shown a variety of expanded applications in the food industry. On the one hand, they are used to improve the flavor of fermented foods, increase the nutrition of foods, reduce harmful substances, increase shelf life, and so on. On the other hand, they can be used as probiotics to promote health in the body. This article reviews and prospects the important metabolites in the expanded application of lactic acid bacteria from the perspective of bioengineering and biotechnology.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the metabolism of lactic acid bacteria. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are a type of gram-positive bacteria that use carbohydrates as the only or main carbon source. Lactic acid bacteria are generally cocci or rods, and have strong tolerance to low pH. Although lactic acid bacteria include more than 60 genera, the frequently genera occur in food fermentation generally include Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Weissella, etc.. But it has recently been proposed to merge Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae in one family Lactobacillaceae. The genus Lactobacillus was also reclassified into 25 genera. For the taxonomy of the genus Lactobacillus was recently revised, the current nomenclature are used throughout this review.
As a fermentation strain, lactic acid bacteria should have several important metabolism characteristics, such as the ability to produce acid and aroma, the ability to hydrolyze protein, the ability to produce viscous exopolysaccharides and the ability to inhibit bacteria. In this review, the metabolic characteristics of lactic acid bacteria and its application in food industry were reviewed from the aspects of degradation (Table 1) and biosynthesis (Table 2) metabolism of lactic acid bacteria. We hope to summarize the new development trends and promote the contribution of lactic acid bacteria related metabolic engineering and food biotechnology to the food industry.
Degradation of Indigestible Polysaccharides
Polysaccharides are polymers composed of more than ten identical or different monosaccharide units linked by α - or β - glycosidic bonds. In plants, polysaccharides include starch, cellulose, fructan, hemicellulose and so on. The degradation of polysaccharides by lactic acid bacteria depends on various hydrolases. In fermented food, the decomposition of polysaccharides can provide energy for lactic acid bacteria and provide a variety of beneficial substances for human beings. Different kinds of lactic acid bacteria can metabolize different polysaccharides, which determines the different application prospects of related strains in food industry.
In fermented food processing, the degradation of polysaccharides by lactic acid bacteria can produce monosaccharides or lactic acid, etc., which can improve the quality of food. For example, the ability of lactic acid bacteria to degrade polysaccharides has be used in beverage processing to replace the use of the enzymes from molds that decompose polysaccharides. In addition, some genera of lactic acid bacteria are generally regarded as probiotics in the intestine, include Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc. The growth of the probiotics can be promoted by some kinds of polysaccharides, which be defined as prebiotics. In recent years, with the in-depth study of intestinal microbial ecology, research on commercial prebiotic oligosaccharides has increased greatly. The nature of lactic acid bacteria in degrading polysaccharides has attracted more and more attention, not only in the food and fermentation industries, but even in the medical and health-related industries.
In the past, it was thought that lactic acid bacteria made a greater contribution to fermented dairy products, and had a weak ability to hydrolyze sugars and proteins in grains. But it was found that there is a corresponding starch metabolism pathway through the analysis of the KEGG metabolic pathway of lactic acid bacteria. It is also been proved that starch can be hydrolyzed by extracellular enzymes secreted by lactic acid bacteria. Due to the important role played by the starch and other polysaccharides hydrolysis ability in starch-rich sourdough, this part will focus on the metabolic properties of lactic acid bacteria on starch. Starch includes amylose composed of α-(1→4) glucose chain and amylopectin composed of α-(1→4) glucose main chain and α-(1→6) glucose side chain. According to the different types of glycosidic bonds in amylose and amylopectin, their hydrolysis require amylase (both alpha and beta type) and amylopullulanase, respectively. Lactic acid bacteria also play an important role in the fermentation of sourdough. Common bacterial species for starch hydrolysis include Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Levilactobacillus brevis. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum can produce amylase to hydrolyze starch into dextrin, and finally into glucose. There is a potential gene encoding maltogenic amylase in the Weissella genome, which is used to hydrolyze starch in sourdough.
Degradation of Proteins
During food processing, the degradation of macromolecular proteins is an important process that affects food quality, food safety and food nutrition. Dairy fermentations are only food fermentation where protein hydrolysis by lactic acid bacteria is relevant, in all others, proteases from other organisms or the substrate are much more important. Proteolysis in lactic acid bacteria can be divided into several steps, including protein degradation, peptide transport, peptide degradation and amino acid catabolism. Figure 1 shows the metabolic pathway of lactic acid bacteria to degrade casein in milk. Proteolysis in lactic acid bacteria is initiated by cell envelope proteinase (CEP), which degrades proteins into oligopeptides. The second stage of protein degradation is the transfer of dipeptides, tripeptides, and oligopeptides into cells. Three transport systems have been found in lactic acid bacteria, namely oligopeptide, dipeptide and tripeptide transport systems (Opp, DtpP, and DtpT, respectively). Peptides are degraded in cells to amino acid by a variety of peptidases, which include endopeptidases, aminopeptidases, dipeptides, tripeptidases and proline specific peptidases.
In the food industry, the degradation of proteins by lactic acid bacteria can eliminate protein allergens in food. Especially in the fermentation process of dairy products, lactic acid bacteria can degrade casein, thereby reducing the allergenicity of dairy products. For example, certain strains of Enterococcus faecium isolated from fermented milk and cheese can express metalloproteases or cell envelope proteinase (CEP), etc., which can effectively hydrolyze casein in milk. Lactic acid bacteria have made significant contributions not only in dairy products, but also in other fermented foods, such as fermented fruit and vegetable products and fermented grain products. For example, some strains of lactic acid bacteria isolated from sourdough can hydrolyse some of the proteins in wheat including albumins, globulins and gliadins. A strain of Lacticaseibacillus casei from sourdough can metabolize all the immunotoxic 33-mer peptide (97.5 ppm) derived from α2-gliadin. Another study found that some lactic acid bacteria can hydrolyze the IgE binding epitopes of the protein allergens in wheat, thereby reducing the allergenicity of wheat sourdough. Therefore, it has become a new challenge to obtain strains for removing allergens in fermented foods through natural screening or metabolic engineering methods.
Lactic acid bacteria could produce a variety of substances that are beneficial to humans when hydrolyze proteins in the surrounding environment for their own growth needs. Lactic acid bacteria can improve the digestibility of protein in food and enhance the nutritional value of food protein. In the fermentation of dairy products, the lactic acid bacteria could help the human intestinal tract to absorb the amino acids in dairy products. Fermentation of faba bean flour by a strain of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum VTT E-133328 can improve the in vitro digestibility of its protein, especially the content of essential amino acids and free amino acids. For the by-products of pigmented wheat varieties, hull-less barley and emmer, after lactic acid bacteria fermentation combined with xylanase treatment, the protein digestibility in vitro can be as high as 87%, and the product has high free radical scavenging activity and high concentration of peptides and free amino acids. Lactic acid bacteria can decompose the protein in food to produce a variety of small molecule peptides or free amino acids. For example, the main group of lactobacilli in the kefir culture has a strong decomposing effect on milk protein in milk. Lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactococcus lactis, Lentilactobacillus kefiri, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Lactobacillus helveticus can produce angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides. In addition, in Lactococcus lactis, starter lactocepin specificity type may have an important influence on the level of bitterness in low salt-in-moisture cheeses.
Catabolism of Amino Acids
Lactic acid bacteria can also metabolize amino acids in food, and its products include not only a variety of flavor substances, but also substances that people do not want to appear in fermented foods such as biogenic amines (BA). In lactic acid bacteria, the metabolism of amino acids includes deamination and decarboxylation. The deamination reaction produces various α-carboxylic acids, which are involved in various metabolisms in lactic acid bacteria cells. Amino acids can generate a variety of biogenic amines under the action of lactic acid bacteria decarboxylase. For example, after decarboxylation, lysine, tryptophan, tyrosine, histidine and ornithine can generate cadaverine, tryptamine, tyramine, histamine, putrescine, etc., respectively, as shown in Figure 1.
Biogenic amines in food may be beneficial to the survival of lactic acid bacteria, but foods containing a large number of biogenic amines are toxic to humans. The amines in fermented foods can be converted by monoamine oxidase. In cheese, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus will convert tyrosine to tyramine through the action of decarboxylase and transporter TyrP. In aged cheese, Pediococcus pentosaceus can produce histamine in cheese. In view of food safety, some unfavorable metabolic activities of lactic acid bacteria under certain environmental conditions cannot be ignored. Therefore, how to balance the contribution of lactic acid bacteria to the quality of food and the accompanying potential safety issues need to be studied in the future development of lactic acid bacteria species resources and food processing.
In addition, the metabolism of amino acids is of great significance for lactic acid bacteria in order to adapt to the environment. Amino acid (especially glutamine, glutamic acid and arginine) metabolism plays an important role in the adaptation of lactic acid bacteria to the acid environment. The synthesized NH3 during amino acids deamination can increase the pH value inside and outside the cell, thereby protecting the cell from acid stress. In Lentilactobacillus hilgardii, the decarboxylation reaction of histidine and tyrosine also contributes to the acid resistance of the bacteria. Levilactobacillus brevis, Latilactobacillus curvatus, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactococcus lactis can hydrolyze agmatine into putrescine, NH3, CO2 and ATP through the AgDI pathway, which increases the pH of the cytoplasm. In Streptococcus thermophilus, the metabolism of arginine relieves the decrease of intracellular pH by consuming protons and generating NH3.
Conversion of Other Non-nutritive and Harmful Substances in Food
In the food and fermentation industry, lactic acid bacteria can’t only degrade the main nutritional macromolecular substances such as polysaccharides and proteins, but also can degrade some other undesirable substances. Fist of all, lactic acid bacteria can be used to inhibit the accumulation of mycotoxins during the preservation of cereal products. After artificially infected almonds with Aspergillus flavus, the inoculation of Lentilactobacillus kefiri FR7 can greatly reduce the accumulation of aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin B2. Lactic acid bacteria can also decompose harmful substances that may be produced in alcohol fermentation. For example, three lactic acid bacteria (Oenococcus oeni, Levilactobacillus brevis, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum) produce urethanase-promoted EC degradation during co-cultivation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae to break down the potential carcinogenic ethyl carbamate. Lactic acid bacteria can also decompose the phytic acid that affects the taste of food and is difficult to digest. For example, in the fermentation process of yam-based foods, phytase produced by Leuconostoc lactis CCMA 0415, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CCMA 0744 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum CCMA 0745 can decompose phytic acid. The addition of lactic acid bacteria will also reduce the possible undesirable flavors in fermented foods. For example, based on the properties of lactic acid bacteria to produce acid and aroma, the undesirable flavor caused by the fermentation of Bacillus can be improved through fermentation of mixed strains. Lactobacillus helveticus can be used as an auxiliary starter to hydrolyze bitter peptides in cheese production. In addition, Oxalobacter and Lactobacillus species exist symbiotically in the human gut can prevent the formation of stones by producing specific enzymes that help oxalate salts degradation. Although lactic acid bacteria have shown a variety of degradation effects, because lactic acid bacteria are not traditionally considered microorganisms with strong degrading ability, the specific degradation mechanism of most harmful substances in foods still needs extensive and far-reaching research. Moreover, this degradation has limitations in efficiency, effectiveness and environmental conditions. Therefore, the use of lactic acid bacteria to achieve efficient conversion of unwanted substances in food still has certain challenges.
Organic Acids
In the metabolism of lactic acid bacteria, certain metabolic processes such as lactic acid fermentation can synthesize a variety of organic acids including lactic acid. Lactic acid is an important bio-based platform compound, which can be divided into D-lactic acid and L-lactic acid according to its optical rotation. It is widely used in agriculture, food, medicine, chemical industry and environmental protection. In view of the importance of lactic acid as an important industrial raw material, related synthesis research has continued to be a hot spot in recent decades. And this part will mainly discuss the application of lactic acid synthesis in the food industry and related metabolic engineering research.
According to whether aldolase is used in the process of producing lactic acid, lactic acid bacteria can be divided into homolactic fermentation and heterolactic fermentation (Figure 2). Lactococcus and Lactobacillus perform homolactic fermentation, while Leuconostoc, Weissella and Oenococcus perform heterolactic fermentation. (1) In the process of pure lactic acid fermentation, lactic acid bacteria use glucose as a carbon source to produce pyruvate through glycolysis, and then produce lactic acid under the action of lactate dehydrogenase. In theory, 1 mole of glucose produces 2 moles of lactic acid. (2) In lactic acid bacteria of the heterolactic fermentation type, glucose can be decomposed into lactic acid, ethanol, CO2 (in Leuconostoc, etc.) through the phosphoketolase (PK) pathway. In theory, 1 mole of glucose produces 1 mole of lactic acid. (3) Through the pentose phosphate (PP) pathway, glucose 6-phosphate was converted into carbon dioxide, ribulose 5-phosphate and NADPH. Lactate dehydrogenase is a key enzyme for lactic acid bacteria to transform pyruvate into lactic acid, and its stereospecificity determines the configuration of lactic acid. D-lactic acid and L-lactic acid are catalyzed by D-lactate dehydrogenase and L-lactate dehydrogenase, respectively. The optical type of lactic acid synthesized by microorganisms depends on the expression levels of D-lactate and L-lactate dehydrogenase in the strain.
In the food industry, there are many studies on how to improve the yield and optical purity of lactic acid during food processing, and a variety of methods provide ideas from different approaches. In currently industrial production, fermentation strategies are often used to improve the yield and purity of lactic acid. These fermentation strategies include adding different nutrients such as the substrate glucose or vitamin B compounds during the fermentation process, adopting pH control strategies, and using dairy industry waste as a substrate to reduce costs, etc. Among them, strategies such as simultaneous saccharification fermentation (SSF) and both separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) are used for the production of lactic acid to obtain products with high optical purity (>99.9%) and reduce the amount of residual sugar.
In addition to mainly producing lactic acid, lactic acid bacteria also produce acetate, propionate, 3-hydroxypropionate, formate and succinate. For example, when shrimp waste silage is used as a substrate, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus can also produce acetic acid. Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus reuteri produce 3-hydroxypropionic acid through glycerol metabolism pathway. Succinic acid produced by lactic acid bacteria fermentation is also one of the final fermentation products of anaerobic metabolism. The organic acids usually be as a part of the flavor substances. However, due to the complexity of the types of flavor substances, we will discuss them in the following content. In general, the synthetic pathways of organic acids mainly include hetero-lactic fermentation pathways and amino acid metabolism. Firstly, the hetero-lactic fermentation will synthesize other organic acids besides lactic acid. For example, in addition to being decomposed into lactic acid, pyruvic acid can also be decomposed into acetic acid, formic acid, and ethanol under certain conditions, or decomposed into acetic acid and carbon dioxide. In addition, the α-acetolactate is formed by the conversion of excess pyruvate by α-acetolactate synthase (ALS) under aerobic conditions. Secondly, some organic acids are produced in amino acid metabolism. For example, in Lactococcus lactis, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides and some other lactic acid strains, leucine can generate 2-ketoisocaproic acid (KICA) after transamination, and 2-ketoisocaproic acid (KICA) can be reduced to 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid (HICA). Therefore, adding the above lactic acid bacteria can increase the HICA content in fermented foods. In Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LY-78, phenyllactic acid (PLA) can be accumulated as a by-product of phenylalanine catabolism.
Lactic acid bacteria may metabolize in the intestine to produce organic acids, which is also an important metabolic feature of probiotics. At the same time, the study of the interaction between probiotics and the intestine found that the synthesis of a variety of organic acids is affected by many environmental factors. Moreover, the synthesis process of a certain product is often complicated, and multiple key genes may play a synergistic role. Therefore, research on the synthesis of organic acids from lactic acid bacteria in the context of food or intestines, and clarifying the molecular basis of lactic acid bacteria as probiotics, are also challenging tasks in the future.
Bacteriocin
Bacteriocins are primary metabolites of polypeptides, proteins or protein complexes synthesized by bacteria using ribosomes with antibacterial activity. Bacteriocins can inhibit the growth and reproduction of a variety of bacteria. After years of research and development, people have clear reports on the molecular composition and antibacterial mechanism of bacteriocins. The bacteriocin will interact with the cell surface to increase the permeability of the cell; inhibit the production of cell wall; inhibit the synthesis of nucleic acid; inhibit the synthesis of protein. Bacteriocins may be divided into two categories: Category I is lantibiotics containing lanthionine (such as nisin, epidermin, streptin, etc.; ). Nisin secreted by Lactococcus lactis is the first lanthiococin to be identified. Nisin’s mechanism of action is to cause small pores to form in the plasma membrane of gram-positive bacteria, thereby causing cell damage. The second category is bacteriocins without lanthionine. And there are also a type III bacteriocins, such as helveticin M produced by Lactobacillus crispatus and helveticin J produced by Lactobacillus helveticus. The bacteriocins with biologically must be secreted out of the cell. For example, the secretion mechanism of bacteriocins (such as class II bacteriocins) generally uses the double glycine guide sequence transport system, and some are signal-dependent, which are processed and transported by the secretory pathway transfer membrane protein (GSP) system. In addition, most of the type I and type II bacteriocins are transferred to the outside of the cell through a specific ABC transporter system.
Because of its safety to the human body, some bacteriocins have been used in the food industry as bacteriostats and preservatives. Gasserins produced by Lactobacillus gasseri, bacteriocin produced by Lactococcus lactis, and Sakacin P produced by Latilactobacillus sakei have antibacterial activity against Listeria monocytogenes or Bacillus cereus. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum TN8 can inhibit spoilage microorganisms in raw minced beef and extend the shelf life of these products. Latilactobacillus sakei CTC494 can inhibit the growth of Listeria monocytogenes in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata), thereby improving the safety of the food. The bacteriocin yield of Enterococcus mundtii LP17 can reach 1280 AU/ml, and it has a strong inhibitory ability against Listeria monocytogenes. In addition to inhibiting some food contaminated strains, it has been reported that nisin may also inhibit the growth of Latilactobacillus sakei in ham production.
The synthesis of bacteriocins is also very important for lactic acid bacteria to perform the function of probiotics in the intestine. For example, Levilactobacillus brevis B50 Biocenol (CCM 8618) can significantly increase the proportion of lactic acid bacteria in the intestinal microbiota of bees, and enhance the resistance of bees to infectious diseases and harsh environments. However, how to make lactic acid bacteria synthesize bacteriocins in a controlled dose, and efficiently and stably play the functions of antibacterial, food preservation, and intestinal health promotion in food is the future development direction of bacteriocin synthesis in the food industry.
Vitamins
Many studies now show that lactic acid bacteria can synthesize a variety of vitamins, such as folic acid, riboflavin, vitamin C, pyridoxal, cobalamine and so on. In the food industry, the vitamins synthesized during the fermentation of lactic acid bacteria can be considered as nutritional fortification of food. This nutritional fortification expands the application of lactic acid bacteria to formulate fermented foods rich in certain vitamins for special populations.
Folic acid is a water-soluble vitamin B composed of three parts, purine, p-aminobenzoic acid and polyglutamic acid. As a coenzyme, it participates in the transfer of one carbon unit, thereby playing a role in the biosynthesis of nucleotides and proteins. Because humans and other mammals lack genes related to folic acid synthesis, they can only absorb folic acid in food or synthesized by intestinal flora. Most of the reported strains that can synthesize folic acid belong to the genus Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, and Lactococcus. The folic acid synthesis pathways of lactic acid bacteria include the Pterin branches and the pABA branches, and only when these two branches function at the same time can they synthesize folic acid. Therefore Lactobacillus strains can only metabolize and produce folic acid after adding p-Aminobenzoic acid (pABA) to the culture medium. Lactic acid bacteria can use a variety of substrates to synthesize or convert vitamins, such as dairy products and cereals. For example, Streptococcus thermophilus ST-M6 and TH-4 to add passion fruit by-product and oligofructose to soy milk can produce folic acid. Among them, passion fruit by-product as a growth factor can stimulate the synthesis of folic acid in lactic acid bacteria.
Riboflavin can be produced by many microorganisms including fungi (such as yeast) and bacteria. In lactic acid bacteria, riboflavin synthase coding genes are clustered on a rib operon, and its products (RibC, RibB, RibA, and RibH) can catalyze the conversion of GTP and 5-phosphate ribose into riboflavin. In the study of constructing genetically engineered strains with high production of riboflavin, it was found that certain changes in DNA regions related to regulation will affect the synthesis of riboflavin in lactic acid bacteria. For example, by inserting a 1059-bp DNA fragment into the upstream regulatory region of the rib operon of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, the amount of riboflavin produced by the mutant strain will be higher than that of the wild type. Another study found that in the Lactococcus lactis JC017 mutant, purine starvation induced the overexpression of riboflavin biosynthesis cluster ribABGH, indicating that mutations that inhibit purine biosynthesis can trigger riboflavin secretion more effectively.
In addition to folic acid and riboflavin, lactic acid bacteria can also produce other types of vitamins. For example, the aerobic fermentation of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 with fructose or trehalose as a carbon source can synthesize vitamin K2. A strain of Latilactobacillus sakei UONUMA promotes the content of vitamin B2 (riboflavin), B3 (nicotinic acid and nicotinamide), and B6 (pyridoxine) in the traditional sweet Japanese beverage (koji amazake). Limosilactobacillus reuteri CRL 1098 and Lactobacillus coryniformis CRL 1001 are well-known cobalamin producing strains.
Exopolysaccharides
Polysaccharides are macromolecular substances produced by the polymerization of multiple monosaccharides or their derivatives. In recent years, exopolysaccharides have been favored because of their excellent physical properties and probiotic functions. A variety of lactic acid bacteria can synthesize different kinds of exopolysaccharides, such as Streptococcus thermophilus, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and so on. The exopolysaccharides of lactic acid bacteria are not only related to the adhesion of lactic acid bacteria, but also give new characteristics to fermented foods. Many review articles discussed the important influence of exopolysaccharides on the physiological function of lactic acid bacteria. In view of the potential applications of the physical, chemical and biological properties of exopolysaccharides in fermented foods, this section introduces exopolysaccharides and their synthetic strains.
The genome of lactic acid bacteria contains one or more clusters of exopolysaccharides gene synthesis. A typical polysaccharide synthesis gene cluster generally includes genes related to sugar nucleotide synthesis, glycosyltransferase genes, and polysaccharide synthesis regulatory genes. Take the hetero-exopolysaccharide (HepS) as an example, the synthesis pathway (Figure 3) mainly includes the synthesis of precursor nucleotide sugars, the initiation and extension of repeating units, the inversion and polymerization of repeating units, and the output of polysaccharides. In the synthesis of exopolysaccharides, sugars are first transported to the cytoplasm and sugar-1-phosphate is synthesized. Phosphoenolpyruvate transport system can transfer phosphate groups to sugar during sugar transport. It is subsequently activated into sugar-nucleotide structural units (such as UDP-glucose, GDP-mannose, UDP-galactose, dTDP-rhamnose, etc.) and then polymerized in a certain order, and finally secreted and exported to form exopolysaccharides. In addition to the monosaccharide structural units mentioned above, the monosaccharide components of exopolysaccharide of lactic acid bacteria also include: fructose, glucuronic acid, fucose, N-acetylglucosamine, and N-acetylgalactosamine.
Exopolysaccharides (EPS) can be used as an additive in the food industry, especially in the fermented dairy industry. For example, glucan can be used as a gelling agent, stabilizer, thickener and emulsifier in the production of food and cosmetics. Similarly, its production strains can also be used in the processing of fermented foods. For example, some starters that can synthesize EPS (such as Streptococcus thermophilus zlw TM11 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 34.5) can increase the exopolysaccharides content of yogurt and improve the syneresis, texture and sensory of yogurt. A new type of EPS produced by a strain of Lactococcus lactis F-mou (LT898177.1), showing good water and oil holding capacities, high antioxidant efficiency and excellent anti-clotting activity, and has strong inhibitory activity with a variety of pathogenic bacteria. The high molecular weight EPS synthesized by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum BR2 has strong antioxidant activity, radical scavenging activity, and no cytotoxicity. Adding sucrose to the dough can promote the production of glucan, and the special effect of the glucan structure may extend to the pores of the crumbs, thereby improving the texture of the bread. In short, exopolysaccharides and their production strains have important potential applications in the food industry, but due to the complex structure of exopolysaccharides, the relationship between the synthesis mechanism and functional properties of exopolysaccharides is also the focus of future research.
Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (γ-aminobutyric acid, GABA) is a non-protein natural amino acid that is widely found in nature. GABA is an important neurotransmitter in the central nervous system, and its concentration in the human brain is related to many diseases. L-Glu decarboxylation reaction is the main manner of intracellular GABA synthesis. Glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) is the key rate-limiting enzyme that catalyzes the production of GABA. GAD (Glutamate decarboxylase) and pyridoxal-5’-phosphate participate in the decarboxylation reaction of L-glutamate to generate γ-aminobutyric acid. Several important genes that regulate GABA synthesis have been discovered. For example, in Levilactobacillus brevis, mutations in the GadA gene facilitate the conversion of L-monosodium glutamate (MSG) to GABA. In addition, in the high GABA production Levilactobacillus brevis D17, the potential transcriptional regulator gene gadR can control the synthesis of GABA and the acid resistance of the strain, and the inactivation of gadR completely eliminates the synthesis of GABA.
At present, in the fermentation industry, Levilactobacillus brevis is generally used to produce GABA alone or in combination with other strains. Among them, Levilactobacillus brevis TCCC 13007 can convert the substrates L-glutamic acid and monosodium glutamate into GABA, and the final titer reaches 201.18 g/L, and the molar bioconversion ratio is 99.4%. In addition, the cell immobilization technology also plays an important role in the optimization of GABA production. In the food industry, some microorganisms with high safety that can produce GABA can be used in the production of functional health food ingredients. For example, some lactic acid bacteria can increase the GABA content in fermented cereals. Cheese, yogurt and fermented milk produced by fermentation of lactic acid bacteria can also become GABA-enriched products. In traditional Chinese fermented soybean (Sufu), Levilactobacillus brevis and Bacillus subtilis can be inoculated together to increase the concentration of GABA in the product and reduce the concentration of harmful substances (histamine and serotonin). In addition, in traditional Korean soybean paste, the co-fermentation of Levilactobacillus brevis GABA100 and Aspergillus oryzae KACC 40250 accelerates the conversion of monosodium glutamate and soybean isoflavone glycosides to GABA and soybean isoflavone aglycones.
Flavor Substances
The initial recognition of lactic acid bacteria may be due to its great contribution to humans, that is, to transform perishable milk into flavored yogurt with extended shelf life. Although yogurt has become very common in daily life, the important message brought by yogurt is that lactic acid bacteria have the potential to transform food ingredients into flavor substances. The flavor substances produced by lactic acid bacteria include organic acids, alcohols, ketones and esters. There are generally four ways of formation of flavor substances in food, biosynthesis, enzymatic action, oxidative decomposition and pyrolysis. In fermented foods (such as fermented dairy products, kimchi, vinegar, and fermented dough), lactic acid bacteria either act as the dominant bacteria or work in concert with other dominant bacteria to produce acetaldehyde, diacetyl and other flavor substances through biosynthesis and enzymatic action. The biosynthesis of flavor substances mainly depends on two types of metabolic pathways, one is the citric acid metabolism pathway, and the other is the amino acid metabolism pathway.
The Metabolism of Citric Acid Produces Flavor Compounds
Lactic acid bacteria can produce diacetyl, acetoin, butanediol and other substances in the process of metabolizing citrate, and the secretion of related substances does not require specific transporters. In citric acid metabolism (Figure 4), extracellular citric acid is transported to the cell through membrane-associated permease, such as 2-hydroxycarboxylate transporter (2-HCT). After citrate enters the cell, it is converted into acetate and oxaloacetate under the catalysis of citric acid lyase complex. Then, oxaloacetate is decarboxylated by oxaloacetate decarboxylase (OAD) to produce pyruvate and carbon dioxide. Subsequently, pyruvate can be metabolized in lactic acid bacteria to produce different end products, including lactate, formate, acetate and ethanol, as well as important aromatic compounds diacetyl, acetoin and butanediol (Figure 4). Some strains of lactic acid bacteria cannot convert citric acid to pyruvate, but use citrate transporter to generate succinic acid through malic acid and fumaric acid. Acetaldehyde can be directly catalyzed by pyruvate decarboxylase or pyruvate oxidase, or it can be produced indirectly by the intermediate product acetyl-CoA catalyzed by pyruvate dehydrogenase. Diacetyl is produced by the metabolic intermediate α-acetolactate through oxidative decarboxylation, and at the same time, α-acetolactate can also be catalyzed by α-acetolactate decarboxylase or through non-oxidative decarboxylation to produce acetoin. When α-acetolactate decarboxylase is inactivated and NADH-oxidase is overexpressed, α-acetolactate can be efficiently converted into diacetyl.
In addition, lactic acid bacteria can synthesize sugar alcohols in some processes of sugar metabolism. Sugar alcohols are also called polyols and can be used as thickeners, softeners, stabilizers, etc. Certain lactic acid bacteria (such as Levilactobacillus brevis and Leuconostoc) can directly reduce fructose to mannitol, which can be incorporated into food as a sweetener to exert a variety of beneficial effects. Other hetero-fermentative lactic acid bacteria can synthesize erythritol under certain culture conditions, such as Oenococcus alcohol, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis.
The Metabolism of Amino Acids Produces Flavor Substances in Fermented Foods
In addition to the above pathways, there are other ways to synthesize acetaldehyde. Deoxynucleic acid aldolase catalyzes the decomposition of thymine to acetaldehyde and glyceraldehyde phosphate. In addition, several amino acids can be converted into the intermediate metabolite pyruvate and finally acetaldehyde, or directly into acetaldehyde (Figure 3). For example, Streptococcus thermophilus commonly used in the yogurt industry contains the SHMT gene, which encodes a serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) with threonine aldolase (TA) activity, which catalyzes the decomposition of threonine into glycine and acetaldehyde. In addition, the serine hydroxymethyltransferase encoded by the glyA gene can also catalyze the specific reaction of acetaldehyde formation.
In addition, some strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum can promote the production of aspartic acid related flavor compounds. In Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, aspartic acid may be decomposed into diacetyl, acetoin and 1,3-butanediol under the catalysis of aminotransferase. Some strains of Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus contribute to the production of branched chain amino acid derivatives and aromatic amino acid derivatives. Streptococcus thermophilus and Lacticaseibacillus casei metabolize to produce 2,3-butanedione and 2,3-pentanedione during milk “laban” fermentation.
Contribution of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Fermented Food in Synthesizing Flavor Substances
Acetaldehyde, diacetyl, acetoin and butanediol are typical aroma compounds of many fermented dairy products. A variety of lactic acid bacteria play a role in cheese processing. For example, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei 4341 can produce aroma and sour substances in Italian long ripened cheeses. Limosilactobacillus reuteri INIA P572 enhances the formation of 12 volatile compounds in cheese, but reduces the formation of 5 other volatile compounds. A strain of in Stilton cheese can produce high concentrations of alcohol, organic acids and acetone. In addition, during the fermentation of cheese, with the participation of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei strains, the metabolism of cysteine and methionine will form a sulfuric flavor. Therefore, the research on the enzymes expressed by lactic acid bacteria will help to screen out suitable strains or combinations of strains to improve or increase the flavor of cheese.
In fermented sourdough, lactic acid bacteria also play a role in the formation of flavor substances. For example, during the fermentation of bread sourdough, the combined use of lactic acid bacteria (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Furfurilactobacillus rossiae, and Lacticaseibacillus casei) and yeast produces compounds related to the sour aromas of bread, and contributes to the aroma characteristics of bread. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum may promote the production of more C4-C6 alcohols in sourdough. In the fermentation of alcoholic beverages, lactic acid bacteria also affect the production of flavor substances. In wine fermentation, lactic acid bacteria can perform malic acid-lactic acid fermentation (MLF), that is, directly produce lactic acid by decarboxylation of L-malic acid. Lactic acid bacteria also affect the production of esters in wine. Some substances have outstanding influence and contribution to fermented products, for example, esters play an important role in the aroma of wine. In Bordeaux red wines, lactic acid bacteria are the only bacteria that strongly influence the content of branched hydroxylated esters (ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate and ethyl 2-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoate). The synergistic effect of lactic acid bacteria contributes to the production of flavor substances in vinegar. Some Lactobacillus strains, such as Lentilactobacillus buchneri, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, and Levilactobacillus brevis, may convert 2-acetolactate into acetoin, play important roles in the formation of flavor substances in Zhenjiang aromatic vinegar.
Based on the above analysis, many lactic acid bacteria will give fermented food a variety of flavor substances. However, due to the variety of lactic acid bacteria, fermentation substrates and flavors produced, it is difficult to fully describe. Therefore, in-depth research on the types of metabolism that produce flavor substances has become critical, which helps to find general strategies for regulating flavor substances. Although the whole genomics, transcriptomics and metabonomics, and metabolomics are currently developing rapidly, there are still many functional proteins and metabolic pathways that are still unknown. In addition, although the technology for qualitative and quantitative analysis of flavor substances in fermented products has been greatly developed, the effect of the synergy between multiple flavors is still difficult to evaluate. At the same time, since the stability of the fermentation strain is easily affected by many factors, there may still be changes in flavor substances of different product batches. Therefore, the above-mentioned problems constitute the challenges for the in-depth application of the characteristics of lactic acid bacteria to synthesize flavor substances in the food industry in the future.
Antioxidant Substances
In fermented foods, lactic acid bacteria produce antioxidant substances that are highly safe, and can have a variety of beneficial effects on the human body through food. In recent years, there have been many reports on the synthesis of antioxidant metabolites by lactic acid bacteria. Antioxidant substances have excellent ability to scavenge free radicals and are closely related to human health. Many substances (such as vitamins and polysaccharides) involved in the previous sections have antioxidant capacity, so this section only involves the synthesis of some substances that are mainly used to reflect the antioxidant function of lactic acid bacteria in food. The antioxidant part mainly introduces the metabolism of some phenolic substances by lactic acid bacteria and the limited ability of lactic acid bacteria to synthesize glutathione.
Some lactic acid bacteria (such as Levilactobacillus brevis, Limosilactobacillus fermentum and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum) can metabolize phenolic acid through decarboxylase and reductase. Through the decarboxylation and reduction reaction of phenolic acid, hydroxycinnamic acid (p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid and m-coumaric acid) and some hydroxybenzoic acid (gallic acid and protocatechuic acid) can be degraded. For example, after fermentation of blueberries by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, the polyphenols in blueberries can be converted into active phenol metabolites with strong antioxidant and antiproliferative activities. The dextransucrase expressed by Leuconostoc mesenteroides can convert sucrose into chlorogenic acid glucoside, which increases the water solubility of chlorogenic acid and has better browning resistance. The fermentation of lactic acid bacteria increases the content of sulforaphane in broccoli puree. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus improves the anti-free radical activity of protein extracts from cured meats. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum significantly reduces the protein carbonyl content and protein surface hydrophobicity in fermented sausages, and increases the content of total sulfhydryl contents.
As a natural antioxidant, glutathione is a tripeptide composed of glutamic acid, cysteine and glycine. Two enzymes are important enzymes involved in glutathione metabolism. Glutathione peroxidase catalyzes the conversion of reduced glutathione to its oxidized form, and glutathione reductase regenerates reduced glutathione. Glutathione is rare in Gram-positive bacteria, but it can also be produced in some lactic acid bacteria, such as Streptococcus thermophilus, Enterococcus faecalis, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Latilactobacillus sakei and Ligilactobacillus ruminis, etc.. Although Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT 5716 cannot synthesize glutathione, it can convert oxidized glutathione taken from the environment into reduced glutathione. This also promotes the release of glutathione to the environment. As an additive, glutathione makes outstanding contributions to increase dough rheology and promote the hydrolysis of egg white protein. For example, the glutathione reductase of Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis affects the volume of bread by affecting the thiol content in wheat dough and the polymerization and aggregation of gluten. In addition, glutathione also improves the acid resistance of lactic acid bacteria.
Numerous studies have shown that antioxidants, as a class of metabolites of great concern, have also played an important supplementary role in explaining the mechanism of lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. For example, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Y44 plays an antioxidant role by free radical scavenging ability and activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway. In injury-induced Caco-2 cells, it can down-regulate the expression of inflammatory-related cytokines IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α, and at the same time enhance the expression of intracellular tight junction proteins β-catenin and E-cadherin. Therefore, in-depth study of its metabolic pathways has an important guiding role for the promotion of lactic acid bacteria in human health, or the discovery of more efficient antioxidant substances used in food.
Metabolic Engineering Strategies Application in Lab
Metabolic engineering refers to the use of synthetic biology and systems biology methods to improve the utilization of existing or create new biosynthetic metabolic pathways. In the food industry, the main purpose of applying metabolic engineering strategies in lactic acid bacteria is to increase the production of certain metabolites of lactic acid bacteria (such as exopolysaccharides, sugar alcohol compounds, vitamins and bacteriostatic peptides, etc.).
For example, using central carbon metabolism pathways (including glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, pentose pathway and citric acid cycle, etc.) as the target, the output of a certain target product can be increased by changing the metabolic flux. The research methods mainly include expanding existing metabolic pathways and constructing novel metabolic pathways. (1) Expanding existing pathways means overexpression of rate-limiting enzyme genes in related biosynthetic pathways on the basis of existing metabolic pathways, and inhibiting competitive metabolism. For example, pyruvate is a key substance in the central carbon metabolism pathway, and its content is very important for the synthesis of organic acids such as lactic acid, α-acetolactate, acetic acid, and formic acid. Therefore, in the production of lactic acid, methods such as adjusting the metabolic flow of pyruvate and enhancing the expression of lactate dehydrogenase can be used to achieve high yields. In addition, the use of metabolic engineering can also effectively optimize the ability of lactic acid bacteria to degrade proteins, which in turn helps to control protein hydrolysis and help obtain the most optimized food processing technology. (2) The construction of a novel metabolic pathway refers to the expression of multiple genes encoding a pathway-specific enzyme in a non-natural host to construct a new pathway. This is generally due to the fact that although all possible genetic manipulation procedures and metabolic engineering strategies are used in natural strains, sometimes the production titer of the required metabolites is still very low or does not meet the requirements. For example, by integrating the gene of the short-chain dehydrogenase encoded by Corynebacterium glutamicum into Pediococcus acidilactici, the resulting genetically engineered strain synthesizes higher yield of D-lactic acid.
In short, with the development of the CRISPR-Cas9 system and other gene editing systems, a variety of metabolic engineering strategies can be used to meet the growing demand for microbial metabolites in industrial production.
Conclusion and Perspectives
Although the lactic acid bacteria had been used in fermentation products for a long time. The lactic acid bacteria work in a vast array of ways that its functional characteristics are quite different. In the food industry, a variety of bacteria’s can ferment a variety of substrates into products or produce a variety of industrial raw materials during the fermentation process. Due to the limited output of its products, despite some of the products being valuable, some lactic acid bacteria may not be enough to be used as industrial-grade bacteria. Therefore, the use of synthetic biology technology to carry out targeted transformation of strains can help synthesize certain products in high yield. The constructed lactic acid bacteria engineering strain can be used to increase the production of organic acids such as γ-aminobutyric acid and lactic acid, exopolysaccharides, vitamins and other products, and can also be used to express enzymes that decompose proteins and polysaccharides. Among them, Levilactobacillus brevis, Lactococcus lactis, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and other lactic acid strains have carried out excellent metabolic engineering work. In addition, the use of industrial wastes such as whey as production substrates is also an important way to alleviate the current situation of resource shortages. However, in some cases, when the inherent flora structure in the human intestine encounters excessive intake of certain lactic acid bacteria, it may cause the original flora structure to become unbalanced and cause human discomfort. Therefore, the understanding of strain metabolism can avoid some damage to human health.
In addition, the development of modern biotechnology such as multi-omics technology and gene editing technology and its application in lactic acid bacteria have also strongly promoted in-depth research on the metabolism of lactic acid bacteria. The research on the metabolic pathways and metabolic characteristics of lactic acid bacteria will help further guide the application of lactic acid bacteria in the food industry and human health industry.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References 181
- 1.
Albuquerque M. Bedani R. LeBlanc J. Saad S. (2017 ). Passion fruit by-product and fructooligosaccharides stimulate the growth and folate production by starter and probiotic cultures in fermented soymilk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 261 35–41.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.09.001
- 2.
Ali N. Gong H. Giwa A. Yuan Q. Wang K. (2019 ). Metagenomic analysis and characterization of acidogenic microbiome and effect of pH on organic acid production. Arc. Microbiol. 201 1163–1171.
Not in our library10.1007/s00203-019-01676-2
- 3.
- 4.
Alvarez-Sieiro P. Redruello B. Ladero V. Martín M. C. Fernández M. Alvarez M. A. (2016b ). Screening sourdough samples for gliadin-degrading activity revealed Lactobacillus casei strains able to individually metabolize the coeliac-disease-related 33-mer peptide. Can. J. Microbiol. 62 422–430.
Not in our library10.1139/cjm-2015-0796
- 5.
Azam M. Mohsin M. Ijaz H. Tulain U. R. Ashraf M. A. Fayyaz A. (2017 ). Review-Lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented Asian foods. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 30 1803–1814.
Not in our library
- 6.
Azhar N. Md Zin N. Hamid T. (2017 ). Lactococcus lactis strain a5 producing nisin-like bacteriocin active against gram positive and negative bacteria. Tro. Life. Sci. Res. 28 107–118.
Not in our library10.21315/tlsr2017.28.2.8
- 7.
Bai Y. Dobruchowska J. Gerwig G. Dijkhuizen L. (2016 ). Structural basis for the roles of starch and sucrose in homo-exopolysaccharide formation by Lactobacillus reuteri 35-5. Carbohyd. Polym. 151 29–39.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.048
- 8.
Bancalari E. Savo Sardaro M. Levante A. Marseglia A. Caligiani A. Lazzi C. (2017 ). An integrated strategy to discover Lactobacillus casei group strains for their potential use as aromatic starters. Food Res. Int. 100 682–690.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.066
- 9.
Bandell M. Ansanay V. Rachidi N. Dequin S. Lolkema J. (1997 ). Membrane potential-generating malate and citrate transporters of lactic acid bacteria are homologous proteins. Substrate specificity of the 2-hydroxycarboxylate transporter family. J. Biol. Chem. 272 18140–18146.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.272.29.18140
- 10.
Bao W. Huang X. Liu J. Han B. Chen J. (2020 ). Influence of Lactobacillus brevis on metabolite changes in bacteria-fermented sufu. J. Food Sci. 85 165–172.
Not in our library10.1111/1750-3841.14968
- 11.
- 12.
Barthelmebs L. Divies C. Cavin J. (2000 ). Knockout of the p-coumarate decarboxylase gene from Lactobacillus plantarum reveals the existence of two other inducible enzymatic activities involved in phenolic acid metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microb 66 3368–3375.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.66.8.3368-3375.2000
- 13.
Batista N. Ramos C. L. de Figueiredo Vilela L. Dias D. R. Schwan R. F. (2019 ). Fermentation of yam by indigenous phytase-producing lactic acid bacteria strains. Braz. J. Microbiol. 50 507–514.
Not in our library10.1007/s42770-019-00059-5
- 14.
Bekal S. Van Beeumen J. Samyn B. Garmyn D. Henini S. Diviès C. (1998 ). Purification of Leuconostoc mesenteroides citrate lyase and cloning and characterization of the cit CDEFG gene cluster. J. Bacteriol. 180 647–654.
Not in our library10.1128/jb.180.3.647-654.1998
- 15.
Ben Taheur F. Mansour C. Kouidhi B. Chaieb K. (2019 ). Use of lactic acid bacteria for the inhibition of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus carbonarius growth and mycotoxin production. Toxicon 166 15–23.
Not in our library10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.05.004
- 16.
Ben-Harb S. Saint-Eve A. Panouillé M. Souchon I. Bonnarme P. Dugat-Bony E. (2019 ). Design of microbial consortia for the fermentation of pea-protein-enriched emulsions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 293 124–136.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.01.012
- 17.
Bernardo M. Coelho L. Sass D. Contiero J. (2016 ). l-(+)-Lactic acid production by Lactobacillus rhamnosus B103 from dairy industry waste. Braz. J. Microbiol. 47 640–646.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bjm.2015.12.001
- 18.
Biscola V. Choiset Y. Rabesona H. Chobert J. Haertlé T. Franco B. (2018 ). Brazilian artisanal ripened cheeses as sources of proteolytic lactic acid bacteria capable of reducing cow milk allergy. J. Appl. Microbiol. 125 564–574.
Not in our library10.1111/jam.13779
- 19.
Boels I. Kranenburg R. Hugenholtz J. Kleerebezem M. Vos W. (2001 ). Sugar catabolism and its impact on the biosynthesis and engineering of exopolysaccharide production in lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy. J. 11 723–732.
Not in our library
- 20.
Caggianiello G. Kleerebezem M. Spano G. (2016 ). Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: from health-promoting benefits to stress tolerance mechanisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100 3877–3886.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-016-7471-2
- 21.
Cai Y. Augustin M. A. Jegasothy H. Wang J. Terefe N. (2020 ). Mild heat combined with lactic acid fermentation: a novel approach for enhancing sulforaphane yield in broccoli puree. Food Funct. 11 779–786.
Not in our library10.1039/c9fo02089f
- 22.
Capozzi V. Russo P. Dueñas M. T. López P. Spano G. (2012 ). Lactic acid bacteria producing B-group vitamins: a great potential for functional cereals products. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 96 1383–1394.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-012-4440-2
- 23.
Cappello M. Zapparoli G. Logrieco A. Bartowsky E. (2017 ). Linking wine lactic acid bacteria diversity with wine aroma and flavour. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 243 16–27.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.11.025
- 24.
Cerning J. (1990 ). Exocellular polysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 7 113–130.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04883.x
- 25.
Chammas G. Saliba R. Corrieu G. Béal C. (2006 ). Characterisation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented milk “laban”. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 110 52–61.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.01.043
- 26.
Chaves A. Fernandez M. Lerayer A. Mierau I. Kleerebezem M. Hugenholtz J. (2002 ). Metabolic engineering of acetaldehyde production by Streptococcus thermophilus. Appl. Environ. Microb 68 5656–5662.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.68.11.5656-5662.2002
- 27.
Chen H. Tian F. Li S. Xie Y. Zhang H. Chen W. (2012 ). Cloning and heterologous expression of a bacteriocin sakacin P from Lactobacillus sakei in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 94 1061–1068.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-012-3872-z
- 28.
Chen J. Vestergaard M. Jensen T. Shen J. Dufva M. Solem C. (2017 ). Finding the needle in the haystack-the use of microfluidic droplet technology to identify vitamin-secreting lactic acid bacteria. mBio 8:e00526-17.
Not in our library10.1128/mbio.00526-17
- 29.
Chen X. Levy C. Gänzle M. (2016 ). Structure-function relationships of bacterial and enzymatically produced reuterans and dextran in sourdough bread baking application. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 239 95–102.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.010
- 30.
Christensen J. Dudley E. Pederson J. Steele J. (1999 ). Peptidases and amino acid catabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Anton. Leeuw 76 217–246.
Not in our library
- 31.
Coda R. Melama L. Rizzello C. Curiel J. Sibakov J. Holopainen U. (2015 ). Effect of air classification and fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum VTT E-133328 on faba bean flour nutritional properties. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 193 34–42.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.10.012
- 32.
Coolbear T. Weimer B. Wilkinson M. G. (2011 ). Lactic acid bacteria | lactic acid bacteria in flavor development. Encyclopedia. Dairy Scis 73 160–165.
Not in our library
- 33.
Costa J. Bover-Cid S. Bolívar A. Zurera G. Pérez-Rodríguez F. (2019 ). Modelling the interaction of the sakacin-producing Lactobacillus sakei CTC494 and Listeria monocytogenes in filleted gilthead sea bream under modified atmosphere packaging at isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 297 72–84.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.03.002
- 34.
Cotter P. Hill C. Ross R. (2005 ). Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3 777–788.
Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro1273
- 35.
Cubas-Cano E. González-Fernández C. Tomás-Pejó E. (2019 ). Evolutionary engineering of Lactobacillus pentosus improves lactic acid productivity from xylose-rich media at low pH. Bioresource Technol. 288:121540.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121540
- 36.
- 37.
Daliri E. Lee B. Park B. Kim S. Oh D. H. (2018 ). Antihypertensive peptides from whey proteins fermented by lactic acid bacteria. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 27 1781–1789.
Not in our library10.1007/s10068-018-0423-0
- 38.
Dallas D. Citerne F. Tian T. Silva V. Kalanetra K. Frese S. (2016 ). Peptidomic analysis reveals proteolytic activity of kefir microorganisms on bovine milk proteins. Food Chem. 197 273–284.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.116
- 39.
Deegan L. Cotter P. Hill C. Ross P. (2006 ). Bacteriocins: biological tools for bio-preservation and shelf-life extension. Int. Dairy J. 16 1058–1071.
Not in our library
- 40.
Deibel R. H. Niven C. F. Jr. (1964 ). Pyruvate fermentation by Streptococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 88 4–10.
Not in our library10.1128/jb.88.1.4-10.1964
- 41.
Diaz M. Del Rio B. Ladero V. Redruello B. Fernández M. Martin M. C. (2020 ). Histamine production in Lactobacillus vaginalis improves cell survival at low pH by counteracting the acidification of the cytosol. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 321:108548.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108548
- 42.
Diep D. Nes I. F. (2002 ). Ribosomally synthesized antibacterial peptides in Gram positive bacteria. Curr. Drug Targets 3 107–122.
Not in our library10.2174/1389450024605409
- 43.
- 44.
Drinan D. Robin S. Cogan T. (1976 ). Citric acid metabolism in hetero- and homofermentative lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microb 31 481–486.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.31.4.481-486.1976
- 45.
Eiteman M. Ramalingam S. (2015 ). Microbial production of lactic acid. Biotechnol. Lett. 37 955–972.
Not in our library10.1007/s10529-015-1769-5
- 46.
Even S. Lindley N. Loubière P. Cocaign-Bousquet M. (2002 ). Dynamic response of catabolic pathways to autoacidification in Lactococcus lactis: transcript profiling and stability in relation to metabolic and energetic constraints. Mol. Microbiol. 45 1143–1152.
Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03086.x
- 47.
Falasconi I. Fontana A. Patrone V. Rebecchi A. Duserm Garrido G. Principato L. (2020 ). Genome-assisted characterization of Lactobacillus fermentum, weissella cibaria, and weissella confusa strains isolated from sorghum as starters for sourdough fermentation. Microorganisms 8:1388.
Not in our library10.3390/microorganisms8091388
- 48.
Fang R. Zhou W. Chen Q. (2019 ). Ethyl carbamate regulation and genomic expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during mixed-culture yellow rice wine fermentation with Lactobacillus sp. Food Chem. 292 90–97.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.014
- 49.
- 50.
Filannino P. Bai Y. Di Cagno R. Gobbetti M. Gänzle M. (2015 ). Metabolism of phenolic compounds by Lactobacillus spp. during fermentation of cherry juice and broccoli puree. Food Microbiol. 46 272–279.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fm.2014.08.018
- 51.
Filannino P. Di Cagno R. Gobbetti M. (2018 ). Metabolic and functional paths of lactic acid bacteria in plant foods: get out of the labyrinth. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 49 64–72.
Not in our library10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.016
- 52.
Fimland G. Johnsen L. Axelsson L. Brurberg M. Nes I. Eijsink V. (2000 ). A C-terminal disulfide bridge in pediocin-like bacteriocins renders bacteriocin activity less temperature dependent and is a major determinant of the antimicrobial spectrum. J. Bacteriol. 182 2643–2648.
Not in our library10.1128/jb.182.9.2643-2648.2000
- 53.
Fuglsang A. Rattray F. Nilsson D. Nyborg N. (2003 ). Lactic acid bacteria: inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme in vitro and in vivo. Anton. Leeuw 83 27–34.
Not in our library10.1023/a:1022993905778
- 54.
Gammacurta M. Lytra G. Marchal A. Marchand S. Christophe Barbe J. Moine V. (2018 ). Influence of lactic acid bacteria strains on ester concentrations in red wines: specific impact on branched hydroxylated compounds. Food Chem. 239 252–259.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.123
- 55.
- 56.
Gänzle M. Zheng J. (2019 ). Lifestyles of sourdough lactobacilli - do they matter for microbial ecology and bread quality? Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 302 15–23.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.08.019
- 57.
Gänzle M. G. (2015 ). Lactic metabolism revisited: metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2 106–117.
Not in our library
- 58.
- 59.
Ge Q. Chen S. Liu R. Chen L. Yang B. Yu H. (2019 ). Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum NJAU-01 on the protein oxidation of fermented sausage. Food Chem. 295 361–367.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.154
- 60.
Ge Y. Zhang J. Corke H. Gan R. (2020 ). Screening and spontaneous mutation of pickle-derived Lactobacillus plantarum with overproduction of riboflavin, related mechanism, and food application. Foods 9:88.
Not in our library10.3390/foods9010088
- 61.
Genay M. Sadat L. Gagnaire V. Lortal S. (2009 ). prtH2, not prtH, is the ubiquitous cell wall proteinase gene in Lactobacillus helveticus. Appl. Environ. Microb 75 3238–3249.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.02395-08
- 62.
- 63.
Gerwig G. (2019 ). Structural analysis of exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria. Methods Mole. Biol. 1887 67–84.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4939-8907-2_7
- 64.
Gómez-Torres N. ávila M. Delgado D. Garde S. (2016 ). Effect of reuterin-producing Lactobacillus reuteri coupled with glycerol on the volatile fraction, odour and aroma of semi-hard ewe milk cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 232 103–110.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.05.031
- 65.
Gong L. Ren C. Xu Y. (2019 ). Deciphering the crucial roles of transcriptional regulator GadR on gamma-aminobutyric acid production and acid resistance in Lactobacillus brevis. Microb. Cell Fact. 18:108.
Not in our library10.1186/s12934-019-1157-2
- 66.
Górska S. Grycko P. Rybka J. Gamian A. (2007 ). Egzopolisacharydy bakterii kwasu mlekowego - biosynteza i struktura [Exopolysaccharides of lactic acid bacteria: structure and biosynthesis]. Postepy. Hig. Med. Dosw. 61 805–818.
Not in our library
- 67.
Hagting A. Kunji E. Leenhouts K. Poolman B. Konings W. (1994 ). The di- and tripeptide transport protein of Lactococcus lactis. a new type of bacterial peptide transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 269 11391–11399.
Not in our library
- 68.
Han X. Li L. Wei C. Zhang J. Bao J. (2019 ). Facilitation of l-lactic acid fermentation by lignocellulose biomass rich in vitamin b compounds. J. Agr. Food Chem. 67 7082–7086.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02297
- 69.
Han X. Yang Z. Jing X. Yu P. Zhang Y. Yi H. (2016 ). Improvement of the texture of yogurt by use of exopolysaccharide producing lactic acid bacteria. BioMed. Res. Int. 2016:7945675.
Not in our library10.1155/2016/7945675
- 70.
Hidalgo-Cantabrana C. Goh Y. Pan M. Sanozky-Dawes R. Barrangou R. (2019 ). Genome editing using the endogenous type I CRISPR-cas system in Lactobacillus crispatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 116 15774–15783.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1905421116
- 71.
Hsueh Y. Liaw W. Kuo J. Deng C. Wu C. (2017 ). Hydrogel Film-Immobilized Lactobacillus brevis RK03 for γ-aminobutyric acid production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18:2324.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms18112324
- 72.
Huang S. Ai Z. Sun X. Liu G. Zhai S. Zhang M. (2016 ). Influence of arginine on the growth, arginine metabolism and amino acid consumption profiles of Streptococcus thermophilus T1C2 in controlled pH batch fermentations. J. Appl. Microbiol. 121 746–756.
Not in our library10.1111/jam.13221
- 73.
Hugenholtz J. Kleerebezem M. Starrenburg M. Delcour J. de Vos W. Hols P. (2000 ). Lactococcus lactis as a cell factory for high-level diacetyl production. Appl. Environ. Microb 66 4112–4114.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.66.9.4112-4114.2000
- 74.
Ibarra A. Acha R. Calleja M. Chiralt-Boix A. Wittig E. (2012 ). Optimization and shelf life of a low-lactose yogurt with Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001. J. Dairy Sci. 95 3536–3548.
Not in our library10.3168/jds.2011-5050
- 75.
Iseppi R. Stefani S. de Niederhausern S. Bondi M. Sabia C. Messi P. (2019 ). Characterization of Anti-Listeria monocytogenes properties of two bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus mundtii isolated from fresh fish and seafood. Curr. Microbiol. 76 1010–1019.
Not in our library10.1007/s00284-019-01716-6
- 76.
Iwamoto H. Matsubara T. Okamoto T. Matsumoto T. Yoshikawa M. Takeda Y. (2019 ). Ingestion of casein hydrolysate induces oral tolerance and suppresses subsequent epicutaneous sensitization and development of anaphylaxis reaction to casein in mice. Int. Arch. Allergy Imm. 179 221–230.
Not in our library10.1159/000497410
- 77.
Jeske S. Zannini E. Lynch K. Coffey A. Arendt E. (2018 ). Polyol-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from sourdough and their application to reduce sugar in a quinoa-based milk substitute. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 286 31–36.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.07.013
- 78.
Kalschne D. Geitenes S. Veit M. Sarmento C. Colla E. (2014 ). Growth inhibition of lactic acid bacteria in ham by nisin: a model approach. Meat. Sci. 98 744–752.
Not in our library10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.002
- 79.
Kêska P. Stadnik J. (2018 ). Stability of antiradical activity of protein extracts and hydrolysates from dry-cured pork loins with probiotic strains of LAB. Nutrients 10:521.
Not in our library10.3390/nu10040521
- 80.
Khalili M. Rad A. Khosroushahi A. Khosravi H. Jafarzadeh S. (2020 ). Application of probiotics in folate bio-fortification of yoghurt. Probiotics. Antimicro 12 756–763.
Not in our library10.1007/s12602-019-09560-9567
- 81.
Kim K. Chun B. Baek J. Roh S. Lee S. Jeon C. (2020 ). Genomic and metabolic features of Lactobacillus sakei as revealed by its pan-genome and the metatranscriptome of kimchi fermentation. Food Microbiol. 86:103341.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fm.2019.103341
- 82.
Komprda T. Burdychová R. Dohnal V. Cwiková O. Sládková P. Dvorácková H. (2008 ). Tyramine production in dutch-type semi-hard cheese from two different producers. Food Microbiol. 25 219–227.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fm.2007.11.006
- 83.
Kordesedehi R. Taheri-Kafrani A. Rabbani-Khorasgani M. Kazemi R. Mutangadura D. Haertle T. (2018 ). Modification of IgE binding to αS1-casein by proteolytic activity of Enterococcus faecium isolated from Iranian camel milk samples. J. Biotechnol. 27 10–14.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.04.005
- 84.
- 85.
Kumar V. Ashok S. Park S. (2013 ). Recent advances in biological production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid. Biotechnol. Adv. 31 945–961.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.02.008
- 86.
Kumariya R. Garsa A. Rajput Y. Sood S. Akhtar N. Patel S. (2019 ). Bacteriocins: classification, synthesis, mechanism of action and resistance development in food spoilage causing bacteria. Microbial. Pathogenesis 128 171–177.
Not in our library10.1016/j.micpath.2019.01.002
- 87.
Kunji E. Mierau I. Hagting A. Poolman B. Konings W. (1996 ). The proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Anton. Leeuw 70 187–221.
Not in our library10.1007/bf00395933
- 88.
Lamberti C. Purrotti M. Mazzoli R. Fattori P. Barello C. Coïsson J. (2011 ). ADI pathway and histidine decarboxylation are reciprocally regulated in Lactobacillus hilgardii ISE 5211: proteomic evidence. Amino. Acids 41 517–527.
Not in our library10.1007/s00726-010-0781-2
- 89.
Laws A. Gu Y. Marshall V. (2001 ). Biosynthesis, characterisation, and design of bacterial exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 19 597–625.
Not in our library10.1016/s0734-9750(01)00084-2
- 90.
Lee K. Pi K. Kim E. Rho B. Kang S. Lee H. (2010 ). Glutathione-mediated response to acid stress in the probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus salivarius. Biotechnol. Lett. 32 969–972.
Not in our library10.1007/s10529-010-0244-6
- 91.
Leemhuis H. Dobruchowska J. Ebbelaar M. Faber F. Buwalda P. van der Maarel M. (2014 ). Isomalto/malto-polysaccharide, a novel soluble dietary fiber made via enzymatic conversion of starch. J. Agr. Food Chem. 62 12034–12044.
Not in our library10.1021/jf503970a
- 92.
Li Q. Loponen J. Gänzle M. G. (2020 ). Characterization of the extracellular fructanase frua in Lactobacillus crispatus and its contribution to fructan hydrolysis in breadmaking. J. Agr. Food Chem. 68 8637–8647.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02313
- 93.
Li Y. Ku S. Park M. Li Z. Ji G. (2017 ). Acceleration of aglycone isoflavone and γ-aminobutyric acid production from doenjang using whole-cell biocatalysis accompanied by protease treatment. J. Microb. Biotech. 27 1952–1960.
Not in our library10.4014/jmb.1705.05052
- 94.
Liao X. Guo L. Ye Z. Qiu L. Gu F. Lin J. (2016 ). Use of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria starters to ferment mango juice for promoting its probiotic roles. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 46 399–405.
Not in our library10.1080/10826068.2015.1045615
- 95.
Liu T. Li Y. Yang Y. Yi H. Zhang L. He G. (2020 ). The influence of different lactic acid bacteria on sourdough flavor and a deep insight into sourdough fermentation through RNA sequencing. Food Chem. 307:125529.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125529
- 96.
Liu Y. van Bennekom E. Zhang Y. Abee T. Smid E. (2019 ). Long-chain vitamin K2 production in Lactococcus lactis is influenced by temperature, carbon source, aeration and mode of energy metabolism. Microb. Cell. Fact 18:129.
Not in our library10.1186/s12934-019-1179-9
- 97.
Lonvaud-Funel A. (2001 ). Biogenic amines in wines: role of lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 199 9–13.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10643.x
- 98.
Loponen J. König K. Wu J. Gänzle M. G. (2008 ). Influence of thiol metabolism of lactobacilli on egg white proteins in wheat sourdoughs. J. Agr. Food Chem. 56 3357–3362.
Not in our library10.1021/jf703600t
- 99.
Lu Z. Liu N. Wang L. Wu L. Gong J. Yu Y. (2016 ). Elucidating and regulating the acetoin production role of microbial functional groups in multispecies acetic acid fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microb 82 5860–5868.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.01331-16
- 100.
Lyu C. Liu L. Huang J. Zhao W. Hu S. Mei L. (2019 ). Biosynthesis of γ-aminobutyrate by engineered Lactobacillus brevis cells immobilized in gellan gum gel beads. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 128 123–128.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.01.010
- 101.
Majee S. Avlani D. Gopa R. Biswas G. (2017 ). Rheological behaviour and pharmaceutical applications of bacterial exopolysaccharides. J. App. Pharm. Sci. 7 224–232.
Not in our library
- 102.
Maruščáková I. Schusterová P. Bielik B. Toporčák J. Bíliková K. Mudroňová D. (2020 ). Effect of application of probiotic pollen suspension on immune response and gut microbiota of honey bees. Probiotics Antimicro 12 929–936.
Not in our library10.1007/s12602-019-09626-6
- 103.
Mattick A. Hirsch A. (1947 ). Further observations on an inhibitory substance (nisin) from Lactic streptococci. Lancet 2 5–8.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(47)90004-4
- 104.
Mayer M. D’Amato A. Colquhoun I. Le Gall G. Narbad A. (2020 ). Identification of genes required for glucan exopolysaccharide production in Lactobacillus johnsonii suggests a novel biosynthesis mechanism. Appl. Environ. Microb 86 e2808–e2819.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.02808-19
- 105.
Meisel H. Bockelmann W. (1999 ). Bioactive peptides encrypted in milk proteins: proteolytic activation and thropho-functional properties. Anton. Leeuw 76 207–215.
Not in our library
- 106.
- 107.
Møller C. Ücok E. Rattray F. (2020 ). Histamine forming behaviour of bacterial isolates from aged cheese. Food Res. Int. 128:108719.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108719
- 108.
Montville T. Chen Y. (1998 ). Mechanistic action of pediocin and nisin: recent progress and unresolved questions. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 50 511–519.
Not in our library10.1007/s002530051328
- 109.
Mu G. Li H. Tuo Y. Gao Y. Zhang Y. (2019 ). Antioxidative effect of Lactobacillus plantarum Y44 on 2,2’-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (ABAP)-damaged Caco-2 cells. J. Dairy. Sci. 102 6863–6875.
Not in our library10.3168/jds.2019-16447
- 110.
Mugampoza D. Gkatzionis K. Linforth R. Dodd C. (2019 ). Acid production, growth kinetics and aroma profiles of Lactobacillus flora from stilton cheese. Food Chem. 287 222–231.
Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.082
- 111.
Mulet-Powell N. Lacoste-Armynot A. Viñas M. Simeon de Buochberg M. (1998 ). Interactions between pairs of bacteriocins from lactic bacteria. J. Food Protect. 61 1210–1212.
Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-61.9.1210
- 112.
Müller G. Kalyani D. Horn S. (2017 ). LPMOs in cellulase mixtures affect fermentation strategies for lactic acid production from lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114 552–559.
Not in our library10.1002/bit.26091
- 113.
Nam S. Ko J. Jun W. Wee Y. Walsh M. Yang K. (2017 ). Enzymatic synthesis of chlorogenic acid glucoside using dextransucrase and its physical and functional properties. Enzyme. Microb Tech. 107 15–21.
Not in our library10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.07.011
- 114.
Nehal F. Sahnoun M. Smaoui S. Jaouadi B. Bejar S. Mohammed S. (2019 ). Characterization, high production and antimicrobial activity of exopolysaccharides from Lactococcus lactis F-mou. Microb. Pathogenesis 132 10–19.
Not in our library10.1016/j.micpath.2019.04.018
- 115.
Nes I. Diep D. Håvarstein L. Brurberg M. Eijsink V. Holo H. (1996 ). Biosynthesis of bacteriocins in lactic acid bacteria. Anton. Leeuw 70 113–128.
Not in our library10.1007/bf00395929
- 116.
Oguntoyinbo F. Narbad A. (2012 ). Molecular characterization of lactic acid bacteria and in situ amylase expression during traditional fermentation of cereal foods. Food Microbiol. 31 254–262.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fm.2012.03.004
- 117.
Oguro Y. Nishiwaki T. Shinada R. Kobayashi K. Kurahashi A. (2017 ). Metabolite profile of koji amazake and its lactic acid fermentation product by Lactobacillus sakei UONUMA. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 124 178–183.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiosc.2017.03.011
- 118.
Ortiz M. Bleckwedel J. Raya R. Mozzi F. (2013 ). Biotechnological and in situ food production of polyols by lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 97 4713–4726.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-013-4884-z
- 119.
Pandey N. Malik R. Kaushik J. Singroha G. (2013 ). Gassericin A: a circular bacteriocin produced by lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus gasseri. World J. Microb. Biot. 29 1977–1987.
Not in our library10.1007/s11274-013-1368-3
- 120.
Papadimitriou K. Alegría Á Bron P. de Angelis M. Gobbetti M. Kleerebezem M. (2016 ). Stress physiology of lactic acid bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. R: MMBR 80 837–890.
Not in our library10.1128/mmbr.00076-15
- 121.
Park B. Hwang H. Chang J. Hong S. Lee S. Jung M. (2017 ). Identification of 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid production in lactic acid bacteria and evaluation of microbial dynamics during kimchi ripening. Sci. Rep-UK 7:10904.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-10948-0
- 122.
Patel S. Majumder A. Goyal A. (2012 ). Potentials of exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria. Indian. J. Microbiol. 52 3–12.
Not in our library10.1007/s12088-011-0148-8
- 123.
Peralta G. Bergamini C. Hynes E. (2016 ). Aminotransferase and glutamate dehydrogenase activities in lactobacilli and streptococci. Braz. J. Microbiol. 47 741–748.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bjm.2016.04.005
- 124.
Perczak A. Goliński P. Bryła M. Waśkiewicz A. (2018 ). The efficiency of lactic acid bacteria against pathogenic fungi and mycotoxins. Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksiko 69 32–45.
Not in our library10.2478/aiht-2018-69-3051
- 125.
Pillidge C. Crow V. Coolbear T. Reid J. (2003 ). Exchanging lactocepin plasmids in lactococcal starters to study bitterness development in Gouda cheese: a preliminary investigation. Int. Dairy. J. 13 345–354.
Not in our library
- 126.
Pontonio E. Dingeo C. Di Cagno R. Blandino M. Gobbetti M. Rizzello C. G. (2020 ). Brans from hull-less barley, emmer and pigmented wheat varieties: from by-products to bread nutritional improvers using selected lactic acid bacteria and xylanase. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 313:108384.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108384
- 127.
Pophaly S. Singh R. Pophaly S. Kaushik J. Tomar S. (2012 ). Current status and emerging role of glutathione in food grade lactic acid bacteria. Microbial. Cell Fact 11:114.
Not in our library10.1186/1475-2859-11-114
- 128.
Qiao Y. Liu G. Leng C. Zhang Y. Lv X. Chen H. (2018 ). Metabolic profiles of cysteine, methionine, glutamate, glutamine, arginine, aspartate, asparagine, alanine and glutathione in Streptococcus thermophilus during pH-controlled batch fermentations. Sci. Rep. 8:12441.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-30272-5
- 129.
Qiu Z. Fang C. Gao Q. Bao J. (2020 ). A short-chain dehydrogenase plays a key role in cellulosic D-lactic acid fermentability of Pediococcus acidilactici. Bioresource Technol. 297:122473.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122473
- 130.
Rahbar Saadat Y. Yari Khosroushahi A. Pourghassem Gargari B. (2019 ). A comprehensive review of anticancer, immunomodulatory and health beneficial effects of the lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides. Carbohy. Polym. 217 79–89.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.025
- 131.
Rai A. Sanjukta S. Jeyaram K. (2017 ). Production of angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory (ACE-I) peptides during milk fermentation and their role in reducing hypertension. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 57 2789–2800.
Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2015.1068736
- 132.
Ramchandran L. Shah N. (2008 ). Proteolytic profiles and angiotensin-I converting enzyme and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activities of selected lactic acid bacteria. J. Food Sci. 73 M75–M81.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00643.x
- 133.
Rincé A. Dufour A. Uguen P. Le Pennec J. Haras D. (1997 ). Characterization of the lacticin 481 operon: the Lactococcus lactis genes lctF, lctE, and lctG encode a putative ABC transporter involved in bacteriocin immunity. Appl. Environ. Microb 63 4252–4260.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.63.11.4252-4260.1997
- 134.
Rodriguez H. Landret J. De Las Rivas B. Munoz R. (2008 ). Metabolism of food phenolic acids by Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 748T. Food Chem. 107 1393–1398.
Not in our library
- 135.
Ruas-Madiedo P. de los Reyes-Gavilán C. (2005 ). Invited review: methods for the screening, isolation, and characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 88 843–856.
Not in our library10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72750-8
- 136.
Rubak Y. Nuraida L. Iswantini D. Prangdimurti E. (2020 ). Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides in milk fermented by indigenous lactic acid bacteria. Veterinary World 13 345–353.
Not in our library10.14202/vetworld.2020.345-353
- 137.
Ryu J. Kang H. Cho S. (2019 ). Changes over the fermentation period in phenolic compounds and antioxidant and anticancer activities of blueberries fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Food Sci. 84 2347–2356.
Not in our library10.1111/1750-3841.14731
- 138.
Sadaf H. Raza S. Hassan S. (2017 ). Role of gut microbiota against calcium oxalate. Microb. Pathogenesis 109 287–291.
Not in our library10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06.009
- 139.
Salazar N. Gueimonde M. de Los Reyes-Gavilán C. Ruas-Madiedo P. (2016 ). Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria as fermentable substrates by the intestinal microbiota. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 56 1440–1453.
Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2013.770728
- 140.
Sanz Y. Toldrá F. Renault P. Poolman B. (2003 ). Specificity of the second binding protein of the peptide ABC-transporter (Dpp) of Lactococcus lactis IL1403. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 227 33–38.
Not in our library10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00662-1
- 141.
Sarantinopoulos P. Kalantzopoulos G. Tsakalidou E. (2001 ). Citrate metabolism by Enterococcus faecalis FAIR-E 229. Appl. Environ. Microb 67 5482–5487.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.67.12.5482-5487.2001
- 142.
Sasikumar K. Kozhummal Vaikkath D. Devendra L. Nampoothiri K. (2017 ). An exopolysaccharide (EPS) from a Lactobacillus plantarum BR2 with potential benefits for making functional foods. Bioresource Technol. 241 1152–1156.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.075
- 143.
Savijoki K. Ingmer H. Varmanen P. (2006 ). Proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 71 394–406.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-006-0427-1
- 144.
Sezen Ö Esmeray K. Fatih Ö (2016 ). Formation of lactic, acetic, succinic, propionic, formic and butyric acid by lactic acid bacteria. LWT 73 536–542.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lwt.2016.06.066
- 145.
Shi X. Chang C. Ma S. Cheng Y. Zhang J. Gao Q. (2017 ). Efficient bioconversion of L-glutamate to γ-aminobutyric acid by Lactobacillus brevis resting cells. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 44 697–704.
Not in our library10.1007/s10295-016-1777-z
- 146.
Shirai K. Guerrero I. Huerta S. Saucedo G. Castillo A. Obdulia Gonzalez R. (2001 ). Effect of initial glucose concentration and inoculation level of lactic acid bacteria in shrimp waste ensilation. Enzyme. Microb. Tech. 28 446–452.
Not in our library10.1016/s0141-0229(00)00338-0
- 147.
Small P. Waterman S. (1998 ). Acid stress, anaerobiosis and gadCB: lessons from Lactococcus lactis and Escherichia coli. Trends. Microbiol. 6 214–216.
Not in our library10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01285-2
- 148.
Smit G. Smit B. Engels W. (2005 ). Flavour formation by lactic acid bacteria and biochemical flavour profiling of cheese products. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29 591–610.
Not in our library10.1016/j.femsre.2005.04.002
- 149.
Sridhar V. Hughes J. Welker D. Broadbent J. Steele L. (2005 ). Identification of endopeptidase genes from the genomic sequence of Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32 and the role of these genes in hydrolysis of model bitter peptides. Appl. Environ. Microb 71 3025–3032.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.71.6.3025-3032.2005
- 150.
Stefańska I. Piasecka-Jóźwiak K. Kotyrba D. Kolenda M. Stecka K. M. (2016 ). Selection of lactic acid bacteria strains for the hydrolysis of allergenic proteins of wheat flour. J. Sci. Food. Agr. 96 3897–3905.
Not in our library10.1002/jsfa.7588
- 151.
- 152.
Sun D. Li H. Song D. Zhang L. Zhao X. Xu X. (2019 ). Genome, transcriptome and fermentation analyses of Lactobacillus plantarum LY-78 provide new insights into the mechanism of phenyllactate biosynthesis in lactic acid bacteria. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co 519 351–357.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.011
- 153.
Surya A. Liu X. Miller M. J. (2018 ). Glutathione utilization in Lactobacillus fermentum CECT 5716. J. Agr. Food Chem. 66 12651–12656.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06136
- 154.
Taranto M. Vera J. Hugenholtz J. De Valdez G. Sesma F. (2003 ). Lactobacillus reuteri CRL1098 produces cobalamin. J. Bacteriol. 185 5643–5647.
Not in our library10.1128/jb.185.18.5643-5647.2003
- 155.
Thage B. Broe M. Petersen M. Petersen M. Bennedsen M. Ard Y. (2005 ). Aroma development in semi-hard reduced-fat cheese inoculated with Lactobacillus paracasei strains with different aminotransferase profiles. Int. Dairy J. 15 795–805.
Not in our library
- 156.
Torino M. Taranto M. Font de Valdez G. (2005 ). Citrate catabolism and production of acetate and succinate by Lactobacillus helveticus ATCC 15807. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 69 79–85.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-005-1949-7
- 157.
Torres A. Vannini V. Font G. Saavedra L. Taranto M. (2018 ). Novel pathway for corrinoid compounds production in Lactobacillus. Front. Microbiol. 9:2256.
Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2018.02256
- 158.
Trabelsi I. Ben Slima S. Ktari N. Triki M. Abdehedi R. Abaza W. (2019 ). Incorporation of probiotic strain in raw minced beef meat: study of textural modification, lipid and protein oxidation and color parameters during refrigerated storage. Meat. Sci. 154 29–36.
Not in our library10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.005
- 159.
van der Maarel M. van der Veen B. Uitdehaag J. Leemhuis H. Dijkhuizen L. (2002 ). Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the alpha-amylase family. J. Biotechnol. 94 137–155.
Not in our library10.1016/s0168-1656(01)00407-2
- 160.
Velikova P. Stoyanov A. Blagoeva G. Popova L. Petrov K. Gotcheva V. (2016 ). New findings from institute of microbiology update understanding of lactates (Starch utilization routes in lactic acid bacteria: new insight by gene expression assay). Environ. Conserv. 68 953–960.
Not in our library
- 161.
Vesanto E. Peltoniemi K. Purtsi T. Steele J. Palva A. (1996 ). Molecular characterization, over-expression and purification of a novel dipeptidase from Lactobacillus helveticus. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 45 638–645.
Not in our library10.1007/s002530050741
- 162.
Wada K. Toya Y. Banno S. Yoshikawa K. Matsuda F. Shimizu H. (2017 ). 13C-metabolic flux analysis for mevalonate-producing strain of Escherichia coli. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 123 177–182.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.08.001
- 163.
Wang C. Sun J. Lassabliere B. Yu B. Zhao F. Zhao F. (2019 ). Potential of lactic acid bacteria to modulate coffee volatiles and effect of glucose supplementation: fermentation of green coffee beans and impact of coffee roasting. J. Sci. Food Agr. 99 409–420.
Not in our library10.1002/jsfa.9202
- 164.
Wegkamp A. van Oorschot W. de Vos W. Smid E. (2007 ). Characterization of the role of para-aminobenzoic acid biosynthesis in folate production by Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microb 73 2673–2681.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.02174-2176
- 165.
Whiting G. Coggins R. (1971 ). The role of quinate and shikimate in the metabolism of Lactobacilli. Anton. Leeuw 3 33–49.
Not in our library10.1007/bf02218465
- 166.
Winters M. Panayotides D. Bayrak M. Rémont G. Viejo C. Liu D. (2019 ). Defined co-cultures of yeast and bacteria modify the aroma, crumb and sensory properties of bread. J. Appl. Microbiol. 127 778–793.
Not in our library10.1111/jam.14349
- 167.
Worsztynowicz P. Schmidt A. Białas W. Grajek W. (2019 ). Identification and partial characterization of proteolytic activity of Enterococcus faecalis relevant to their application in dairy industry. Acta. Biochim. Pol. 66 61–69.
Not in our library10.18388/abp.2018_2714
- 168.
Wu G. Fang Y. Yang S. Lupton J. Turner N. D. (2004 ). Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J. Nutr. 134 489–492.
Not in our library10.1093/jn/134.3.489
- 169.
Wu J. Zhang Y. Ye L. Wang C. (2021 ). The anti-cancer effects and mechanisms of lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides in vitro: a review. Carbohyd. Polym. 253:117308.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117308
- 170.
Wu N. Xu W. Liu K. Xia Y. Shuangquan (2019 ). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from Lactobacillus delbrueckii QS306 fermented milk. J. Dairy. Sci. 102 5913–5921.
Not in our library10.3168/jds.2018-15901
- 171.
Wu Z. Wu J. Cao P. Jin Y. Pan D. Zeng X. (2017 ). Characterization of probiotic bacteria involved in fermented milk processing enriched with folic acid. J. Dairy Sci. 100 4223–4229.
Not in our library10.3168/jds.2017-12640
- 172.
- 173.
Xu D. Tang K. Hu Y. Xu X. Gänzle M. G. (2018 ). Effect of glutathione dehydrogenase of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis on gluten properties and bread volume in type I wheat sourdough bread. J. Agr. Food Chem. 66 9770–9776.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03298
- 174.
Xu Q. Zang Y. Zhou J. Liu P. Li X. Yong Q. (2016 ). Highly efficient production of D-lactic acid from chicory-derived inulin by Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 39 1749–1757.
Not in our library10.1007/s00449-016-1650-5
- 175.
Yan M. Wang B. Xu X. Chang P. Hang F. Wu Z. (2018 ). Molecular and functional study of a branching sucrase-like glucansucrase reveals an evolutionary intermediate between two subfamilies of the GH70 enzymes. Appl. Environ. Microb 84 e2810–e2817.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.02810-2817
- 176.
Yunes R. Poluektova E. Dyachkova M. Klimina K. Kovtun A. Averina O. (2016 ). GABA production and structure of gadB/gadC genes in Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium strains from human microbiota. Anaerobe 42 197–204.
Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.10.011
- 177.
Zaunmüller T. Eichert M. Richter H. Unden G. (2006 ). Variations in the energy metabolism of biotechnologically relevant heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria during growth on sugars and organic acids. Appl. Microbiol. Biot 72 421–429.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-006-0514-3
- 178.
Zhang Y. Vadlani P. Kumar A. Hardwidge P. Govind R. Tanaka T. (2016 ). Enhanced D-lactic acid production from renewable resources using engineered Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Microbiol. Biot 100 279–288.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-015-7016-0
- 179.
Zhao N. Zhang C. Yang Q. Guo Z. Yang B. Lu W. (2016 ). Selection of taste markers related to lactic acid bacteria microflora metabolism for Chinese traditional paocai: a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach. J. Agr. Food Chem. 64 2415–2422.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05332
- 180.
Zheng J. Wittouck S. Salvetti E. Franz C. Harris H. Mattarelli P. (2020 ). A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70 2782–2858.
Not in our library10.1099/ijsem.0.004107
- 181.
Zhou Y. Cui Y. Qu X. (2019 ). Exopolysaccharides of lactic acid bacteria: structure, bioactivity and associations: a review. Carbohyd. Polym. 207 317–332.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.093
Cited by papers we hold 2
- Gamma-aminobutyric acid as a potential postbiotic mediator in the gut–brain axis · 2024No notice
- Fermented Foods, Health and the Gut Microbiome · 2022No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.