Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

REVIEWS OF THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE: TYPES, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS IN NURSING

Luís Manuel Mota De Sousa, Cristiana Furtado Firmino, Cristina Maria Alves Marques-Vieira and 2 more

Revista Portuguesa de Enfermagem de Reabilitação · 2018

doi:10.33194/rper.2018.v1.n1.07.4391 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Introduction: The interest of nursing in the methodology of systematic review of the literature has been increasing, since it constitutes a method that allows a practice based on scientific evidence with scientific rigor. Objective: To characterize the different types of literature review and to describe the main steps of a systematic review of the literature Material and methods: Narrative review of the literature. Database search on the following platforms: Google Academic, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), EBSCO Host, and Virtual Health Library (VHL). Keywords: meta-analysis; evidence-based medicine; review literature as topic; methodology, in the English and Portuguese languages. Results: fourteen types of reviews were described and analyzed according to the type of research, evaluation of the methodological quality of the articles included, synthesis of the information collected and global analysis of the data. The advantages and disadvantages of each type and the main steps of a systematic review of the literature were presented. Conclusions: A systematic review of the literature is the foundation for evidence-based practice, since it aggregates a large amount of information in a single study.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.