PERBEDAAN ANGKA KEJADIAN FISTEL URETROKUTAN PADA PENGGUNAAN KATETER URETRA DAN KATETER SUPRAPUBIK DENGAN STENT SETELAH OPERASI HIPOSPADIA
Yacobda H Sigumonrong, Adi Santoso, Tarmono Djojodimedjo and 1 more
Jurnal Urologi Indonesia · 2016
doi:10.32421/juri.v16i2.338 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Objectives: To study rate of urethrocutaneous fistula formation associated with usage of indwelling urethral catheter compared to suprapubic catheter with stent after hypospadias repair. Materials and methods: Twenty patients with primary hypospadias of penile shaft and posterior type underwent reconstruction with onlay technique by a single operator. Urinary diversion in 10 patients utilised a urethral catheter, while the remainder used a silicone suprapubic catheter with stent. Results: Seven urethrocutaneous fistula were observed (35%) with 4 fistulas in the group with suprapubic catheter and stent, and 3 fistulas in the group with urethral catheters. Fisher exact test value was 0,001 with significance level of 1,000 (p>0,05). Conclusion: There was no difference in rate of urethrocutaneous fistula with use of urethral catheter and suprapubic catheterisation with stent after hypospadias repair.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.