On Epidemiology and Geographic Information Systems: A Review and Discussion of Future Directions

Geographic information systems are powerful automated systems for the capture, storage, retrieval, analysis, and display of spatial data. While the systems have been in development for more than 20 years, recent software has made them substantially easier to use for those outside the field. The systems offer new and expanding opportunities for epidemiology because they allow an informed user to choose between options when geographic distributions are part of the problem. Even when used minimally, these systems allow a spatial perspective on disease. Used to their optimum level, as tools for analysis and decision making, they are indeed a new information management vehicle with a rich potential for public health and epidemiology.

1. 1.

   Beck L. R., Rodriguez M. H., Dister S. W., Rodriguez A. D., Rejmankova E., Ulloa A., Meza R. A., Roberts D. R., Paris J. F., Spanner M. A. Remote sensing as a landscape epidemiologic tool to identify villages at high risk for malaria transmission. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994;51(3):271-280.

   Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1994.51.271 (opens in a new tab)

2. 2.

   Braddock M., Lapidus G., Cromley E., Cromley R., Burke G., Banco L. Using a geographic information system to understand child pedestrian injury. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(7):1158-1161.

   Not in our library10.2105/ajph.84.7.1158 (opens in a new tab)

3. 3.

   Clayton D., Kaldor J. Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. Biometrics. 1987;43(3):671-681.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Gesler W. The uses of spatial analysis in medical geography: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(10):963-973.

   Not in our library10.1016/0277-9536(86)90253-4 (opens in a new tab)

5. 5.

   Glass G. E., Schwartz B. S., Morgan J. M., Johnson D. T., Noy P. M., Israel E. Environmental risk factors for Lyme disease identified with geographic information systems. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(7):944-948.

   Not in our library10.2105/ajph.85.7.944 (opens in a new tab)

6. 6.

   Guthe W. G., Tucker R. K., Murphy E. A., England R., Stevenson E., Luckhardt J. C. Reassessment of lead exposure in New Jersey using GIS technology. Environ Res. 1992;59(2):318-325.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80038-6 (opens in a new tab)

7. 7.

   Kitron U., Pener H., Costin C., Orshan L., Greenberg Z., Shalom U. Geographic information system in malaria surveillance: mosquito breeding and imported cases in Israel, 1992. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994;50(5):550-556.

   Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1994.50.550 (opens in a new tab)

8. 8.

   Malone J. B., Fehler D. P., Loyacano A. F., Zukowski S. H. Use of LANDSAT MSS imagery and soil type in a geographic information system to assess site-specific risk of fascioliasis on Red River Basin farms in Louisiana. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992;653:389-397.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb19667.x (opens in a new tab)

9. 9.

   Wartenberg D., Greenberg M., Lathrop R. Identification and characterization of populations living near high-voltage transmission lines: a pilot study. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;101(7):626-632.

   Not in our library10.1289/ehp.93101626 (opens in a new tab)

10. 10.

    Wartenberg D. Screening for lead exposure using a geographic information system. Environ Res. 1992;59(2):310-317.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80037-4 (opens in a new tab)

11. 11.

    Washino R. K., Wood B. L. Application of remote sensing to arthropod vector surveillance and control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994;50(6 Suppl):134-144.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.1994.50.134 (opens in a new tab)

12. 12.

    Zukowski S. H., Wilkerson G. W., Malone J. B. Fasciolosis in cattle in Louisiana. II. Development of a system to use soil maps in a geographic information system to estimate disease risk on Louisiana coastal marsh rangeland. Vet Parasitol. 1993;47(1-2):51-65.

    Not in our library10.1016/0304-4017(93)90175-m (opens in a new tab)

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.