Cryptocurrency Investing Examined
Jim Liew, Richard Ziyuan Li, Tamás Budavári and 1 more
The Journal of The British Blockchain Association · 2019
doi:10.31585/jbba-2-2-(2)2019 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
In this work we examine the largest 100 cryptocurrency returns ranging from 2015 to early 2018. We concentrate our analysis on daily returns and find several interesting stylized facts. First, principal components analysis reveals a complex daily return generating process. As we examine data in the most recent year, we find that surprisingly more than one principal component appears to explain the cross-sectional variation. Second, similar to hedge fund returns, cryptocurrency returns suffer from the “beta-in-the-tails” hidden risk. Third, we find that predicting cryptocurrency movements with machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms is marginally attractive with variation in predictability power per crypto-currency. Fourth, lower volatile cryptocurrencies are slightly more predictable than more volatile ones. Fifth, evidence exists that efficacy of distinct information sets varies across machine learning algorithms, showing that predictability may be much more complex given a set of machine learning algorithms. Finally, short-term predictability is very tenuous, which suggests that near-term cryptocurrency markets are semi-strong form efficient and therefore, day trading cryptocurrencies may be very challenging.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.