Proposal of a Novel Procedure for C2-4 Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation to Improve Complete Midline Coverage via Electrode Array in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
Yuanyuan Dang, Xiaoyu Xia, Yi Yang and 3 more
Journal of Integrative Neuroscience · 2023
doi:10.31083/j.jin2201006 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Background: Deviation of electrode array from the midline of spinal cords affects the therapeutic outcomes of C2-4 cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). This study proposed the implementation of a novel C2-3 dural exposure procedure and investigated its efficacy compared to conventional surgery. Methods: Surgical and postoperative imaging data from 69 patients with DOC who underwent SCS in the lateral decubitus position were retrospectively assessed. The C2-3 dural exposure procedure was performed in 16 patients while the rest underwent conventional surgery. The incidence of electrode deviation was compared, and factors associated with the deviation were investigated. Results: The rate of complete midline coverage by the electrodes in the C2-3 dural exposure group was significantly higher than the conventional group (93.8% vs. 54.7%, p = 0.004). Exposure of the dura between C2-3 was a significant favorable factor for complete midline coverage by the electrode array (odds ratio [OR]: 0.091; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.011–0.757; p = 0.027). Electrode positioned ≥5 cm above the lower edge of the C2 vertebra was a significant risk factor for incomplete midline coverage (OR: 1.126; 95% CI: 1.016–1.248; p = 0.023). No difference in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, or surgical site infection was observed between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The C2-3 dural exposure procedure, performed in the lateral decubitus position, was safe and had higher complete midline coverage than conventional surgery.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References18
18 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.