Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Ultra Petita dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi

Suwarno Abadi

Jurnal Konstitusi · 2016

doi:10.31078/jk1238 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Ultra petita decision practiced under the MK’s jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legislation needs to be assessed carefully. This practice should not be condemned as illegitimate because there is no explicit constitutional rule that guarantee it. The author therefore argues that this practice can be justified under two reasons. First, judicial activism. Second, the very nature of constitutional adjudication in order to defend the supremacy of the constitution over legislation. According to these reasons, the MK’s ultra petita decision should be upheld because this practice is the most reasonable means to protect the constitution.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.