Krisis Dalam Arkeologi Indonesia
Mindra Faizaliskandiar
Berkala Arkeologi · 1991
doi:10.30883/jba.v12i1.558 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Apakah arkeologi mempunyai paradigmanya sendiri? Sebuah pertanyaan mendasar lantas menjadi penting, arkeologi termasuk ilmu atau seni? Seolah menjawab pertanyaan ini, arkeolog Amerika James F. Deetz menulis: "As a part of cultural anthropology, archaeology is legitimately as social science" (Deetz 1971: 3). Akan tetapi sampal di sini masalahnya tidak lantas menjadi usai. Apakah hanya karena sebagai bagian dari ilmu antropologi budaya saja arkeologi dapat disebut ilmu?
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA
References13
13 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.