"Investigation and Criticism of Denial of Liberty Until Financial Debt Claims in Dowry Claims"

Mahriya philosophy was a pleasing affair for a woman to start a life. As soon as the marriage takes place, the woman owns the mahriyah. When she want,and when she requests must be paid this the debt. The dominance of misconceptions and rivalry has caused numerous in limit of mahriyah has given the eye and eye of metathyroidism. Lack of enough skills to solve family disputes, Patience and tolerance of young girls and Immediately and promptly referring to press her husband by resorting to get mahriyah has caused a lot of damages. Since The Law of the Implementation of Financial Convictions has benefitted from prison. women Imprison her husbands by misusing this rule. Since the law on how to execute financial convictions has been used to disenfranchise individuals, it has been the subject of family lawsuits. This article is an analytical and descriptive method of jurisprudential and legal criticism of denial of couples' freedom in mahriyah lawsuits. The monopoly of deprivation of liberty appears to be defensible in cases of deliberate non-payment of dowry despite financial hardship. In other cases, attempts to resolve the main family problem by consulting, and practicing religion rather than depriving the husband of a better life can be Achieve life and marriage goals and take a step toward reducing divorce rates and inmates.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.