How Can We Analyze Differentially-Private Synthetic Datasets?
Anne-Sophie Charest
The Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality · 2011
doi:10.29012/jpc.v2i2.589 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Synthetic datasets generated within the multiple imputation framework are now commonly used by statistical agencies to protect the confidentiality of their respondents. More recently, researchers have also proposed techniques to generate synthetic datasets which offer the formal guarantee of differential privacy. While combining rules were derived for the first type of synthetic datasets, little has been said on the analysis of differentially-private synthetic datasets generated with multiple imputations. In this paper, we show that we can not use the usual combining rules to analyze synthetic datasets which have been generated to achieve differential privacy. We consider specifically the case of generating synthetic count data with the beta-binomial synthetizer, and illustrate our discussion with simulation results. We also propose as a simple alternative a Bayesian model which models explicitly the mechanism for synthetic data generation.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References12
12 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.