Interpreting the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Bridging Psychological and Sociological Perspectives

Recently, sociologists and psychologists have been investigating the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, yet much of the social science literature regarding COVID-19 remains partial towards either the sociological or psychological perspective. To mitigate the effects of stigma and guilt, a holistic perspective that integrates sociological and psychological viewpoints needs development. The purpose of this article is to synthesize evidence on the social and psychological implications of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the author focuses on two key themes, stigma and guilt. The concept of guilt is emphasized by the psychological literature, while, on the other hand, the concept of stigma exists both in sociology and psychology, but tends towards sociological interpretations given its historical origin. Overall, the presence of stigma and excessive guilt are associated with decreased social compliance and increased mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The author argues that social practices that focus on inclusiveness and preparedness towards mitigating the effects of stigma and guilt—while also complying with public health measures—are crucial for social compliance and increasing societal well-being.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA

1. 17.

   The mental health of doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic · 2020

2. 29.

   COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis · 2020

3. 35.

   The Psychological and Social Impact of Covid-19: New Perspectives of Well-Being · 2020

4. 40.

   COVID-19-Related Mental Health Effects in the Workplace: A Narrative Review · 2020

52 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.