Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Geschichten, Annalen, Mythen

Geoffrey Lloyd

Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften · 2005

doi:10.25365/oezg-2005-16-2-3 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The article – originally published as part of the author’s book The Ambitions of Curiosity. Understanding the World in Ancient Greece and China – systematically compares the roots of historiography in ancient China and ancient Greece. In both cases early historiography seems to be a hybrid, a mixture of several disciplines and knowledge- bases. The social roles of early historians are different: Chinese historians work and write to celebrate, to serve, to teach and to admonish the emperor and his ministers, Greek historians work and write for their peer groups and local communities. But what they have in common, the article argues, is a desire for historical truth derived on the basis of research and criticism.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.