Sozialwissenschaftliche Kreativität in der Ersten und in der Zweiten Republik
Karl H. Müller
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften · 1996
doi:10.25365/oezg-1996-7-1-2 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The article takes its starting point from the remarkable creative difference in social sciences during the First and Second Republic and aims at formulating a theoretical framework for the production of eminent scientific and intellectual achievements. The author applys the instruments of network-theory to a specifically Viennese segment of the intellectual scene, the socalled informal discussion groups and circles, in order to explain the emergence of scientific and intellectual innovations. Models thus constructed, can then be successfully applied to a series of Viennese innovations such as Neurath's pictogram statistics, Goedel's theorem and Popper's criteria of falsification.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.