Review of "Iconoclasm: The Breaking and Making of Images" edited by Rachel F. Stapleton and Antonio Viselli (McGill-Queen University Press)
Charles Athanasopoulos
Lateral · 2020
doi:10.25158/l9.2.9 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Using an eclectic mix of artifacts (e.g. romance novels, historical sites, religious texts, literary texts), 'Iconoclasm' highlights the cyclical nature of iconoclastic gestures and iconolatry. For the authors in this edited collection, iconoclasts re-energize iconophiles’ investments in a particular object through its shattering. In taking a Nietzschean perspective on destruction, they also gesture toward the ways in which iconoclastic acts contain the seeds of a new form of idol worship. Highlighting what they call the “Taussigian principle,” this text compels the reader to consider whether iconoclasm unwittingly reproduces the dialectical relationships it attempts to escape.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.