Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

RELATING TEACHERS ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TO YOUNG LEARNERS UPTAKE: A CASE STUDY IN A YOUNG LEARNER EFL CLASSROOM

Elis Homsini Maolida

Indonesian EFL Journal · 2017

doi:10.25134/ieflj.v3i2.665 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

This study explores various types of oral corrective feedback in relation to learners uptake in a young learner EFL classroom in Indonesia. It employed a qualitative research design embracing the characteristics of a case study. The data were mainly collected from 540 minutes video recording and observation to capture types of teachers oral corrective feedback and learners uptake in the classroom interaction. Teachers lesson plans were also analyzed to look at possible contribution on teachers choice of corrective feedback and learners uptake. The first finding reveals that the teacher employed seven types of oral corrective feedback; recast, elicitation, clarification request, explicit correction, repetition, metalinguistic feedback, and paralinguistic signal. As result, the students responded by various types of uptake such as repair and need repair. The distribution of learners uptake following different types of oral corrective feedback shows that output prompting feedback strategies tend to be more successful in encouraging learners uptake than input provided by feedback strategies. It is also noteworthy that elicitation and repetition led to be the highest number of repair. The fact that input providing feedback strategies result in fewer uptakes, however, tends to be resulted from the teachers choice to continue the topic in a certain context which shows the influence of learning contexts and teachers objectives on the choice of teachers corrective feedback and the occurrence of uptake.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.