Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

THE IMPACT OF QUALITY RESULTS AND IMPORTANT INNOVATION AS TQM PRACTICES ON ORGANISATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY: THE CASE OF RAILWAY SECTOR

Tryson Yangailo

Proceedings on Engineering Sciences · 2022

doi:10.24874/pes04.03.010 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Studies that have empirically investigated the impact of total quality management practices on organization productivity have presented both positive and negative results. This study attempted to investigate the impact of total quality management practices using important innovation as a predictor variable and quality results as a moderating variable to comprehensively understand their impact on productivity in the railway sector by gathering sample data from employees in management of Tanzania Zambia Railway Authority. Model fit, reliability and validity were checked using Principal Component Analysis, Regression Analysis, and Factor Analysis with the help of Jamovi software. The results present a positive significant association between important innovation and productivity. The results also indicate that quality results moderate the relationship between quality results and productivity. The results of this study presents a great theoretical contribution to literature as there has been no study in any sector that attempted to empirically test this relationship using quality results as a moderating variable. Decision makers in organizations are strongly recommended to ensure that they focus and pay attention to quality results at all time in order to encourage innovations that foster higher productivity in their organizations. I hope that this study will be replicated to other industries and that future studies will include other practices of total quality management as mediating and moderating variables to further bring more insights on this association.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.