Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

Gender, health and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development

Mary Manandhar, Sarah Hawkes, Kent Buse and 2 more

Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2018

doi:10.2471/blt.18.211607

Abstract

Gender refers to the social relationships between males and females in terms of their roles, behaviours, activities, attributes and opportunities, and which are based on different levels of power. Gender interacts with, but is distinct from, the binary categories of biological sex. In this paper we consider how gender interacts with the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, including sustainable development goal (SDG) 3 and its targets for health and well-being, and the impact on health equity. We propose a conceptual framework for understanding the interactions between gender (SDG 5) and health (SDG 3) and 13 other SDGs, which influence health outcomes. We explore the empirical evidence for these interactions in relation to three domains of gender and health: gender as a social determinant of health; gender as a driver of health behaviours; and the gendered response of health systems. The paper highlights the complex relationship between health and gender, and how these domains interact with the broad 2030 agenda. Across all three domains (social determinants, health behaviours and health system), we find evidence of the links between gender, health and other SDGs. For example, education (SDG 4) has a measurable impact on health outcomes of women and children, while decent work (SDG 8) affects the rates of occupation-related morbidity and mortality, for both men and women. We propose concerted and collaborative actions across the interlinked SDGs to deliver health equity, health and well-being for all, as well as to enhance gender equality and women's empowerment. These proposals are summarized in an agenda for action.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Globally, the average life expectancy gap between men and women is 4.6 years, with women outliving men in all countries, and a gap of over 10 years in some cases. In addition, the global burden of disease disproportionately affects men in terms of disability-adjusted life years, although women are more likely to spend a longer time living with a disability.

In part, these differences may be due to the impact of sex: biological differences between males and females in growth, metabolism, reproductive cycles, sex hormones and ageing processes. Even when men and women are equally exposed to a risk or disease, the health consequences may be different for each sex. For example, among men and women who smoke tobacco, women appear to develop severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at younger ages than men and with lower cumulative cigarette smoke exposure. However, biological explanations for differences between men and women have limited powers to explain the worldwide differences in health outcomes throughout human history, including in times of rapid demographic and epidemiological transition. These differences are largely due to the social phenomenon of gender.

Gender refers to the roles, behaviours, activities, attributes and opportunities that any society considers appropriate for boys and girls, and men and women. Gender also refers to the relationships between people and can reflect the distribution of power within those relationships. An understanding of gender requires understanding the complex social processes through which people are defined and linked and how this evolves over time. These processes operate at an interpersonal level, at an institutional level and across wider society, in government, the institutions of the state and whole economies. At all these levels, gender is an important, but modifiable determinant of health across the life course. Taking this perspective avoids polarization between men (as perpetrator) and women (as victim), and recognizes and addresses the needs of transgender people.

Gender intersects with other drivers of inequities, discrimination, marginalization and social exclusion, which have complex effects on health and well-being. These intersectional drivers include ethnicity, class, socioeconomic status, disability, age, geographical location, sexual orientation and sexual identity. Intersectionality refers to the meaning and relationship between these factors, in processes and systems of power at the individual, institutional and global levels. The concept of intersectionality builds on, and extends, a gendered analysis of health, by identifying how relationships of power interact with these drivers and gender at different levels.

This paper reflects on the relationship between gender and health in the context of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). The design of the goals is based on interdependence – meaning that no single goal can be achieved without action in other goals. We consider SDG 5 (that is, achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls) as it interacts with SDG 3 (that is, ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages), and how both gender and health intersect across multiple other SDGs in ways that can either hinder or enhance health equity.

Gender and health

Beyond SDGs 3 and 5, gender equality is a cross-cutting feature of Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and is key to realizing women’s and girls’ rights and catalysing progress across all SDGs. There are six gender-specific indicators within SDG 3 on health: (i) maternal mortality ratio; (ii) births attended by skilled health personnel; (iii) new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections, by sex; (iv) satisfactory family planning with modern methods; (v) adolescent birth rate; and (vi) coverage of essential health services, including reproductive and maternal health. Aside from the SDG 3 targets, SDG 5, which includes the elimination of violence against women and girls, has important implications for health.

Other SDGs have been categorized by the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women) as either gender-sensitive or gender-sparse, reflecting the importance of viewing the entire SDG framework through a gender lens. We apply this wider gender perspective to improve understanding and to inform action on health, focusing on the impact on health outcomes.

Conceptually, gender has been described as influencing health and well-being across three domains: (i) through its interaction with the social, economic and commercial determinants of health; (ii) via health behaviours that are protective of, or detrimental to, health outcomes; and (iii) in terms of how the health system responds to gender, including how it affects the financing of and access to quality health care.,

We have extended this framework to outline how several different SDGs impact on each of these three domains (Fig. 1). The domains interact with each other; for example, governance (social determinants domain) determines responses by the health system to a situation (health system domain). The domains also all operate in a wider sociopolitical, cultural and historical context, shaping a range of intersectional drivers of inequalities, exclusion and discrimination that operate alongside gender. Using this framework, we provide evidence of the linkages across gender and the health-related targets of a range of SDGs including, but not limited to, the SDGs on health and gender (Table 1).

Social determinants

The landmark 2008 Commission on the Social Determinants of Health reported that the global burden of disease, and major causes of health inequities, arise from the different conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age. These conditions are affected by inequities in power, money and resources, and all of them are affected by gender. The underlying contexts of socioeconomics and politics (governance, macroeconomic policies, cultural norms and social values), social position (education, occupation, ethnicity and gender) and wider social environment (community cohesion, and social group and individual behaviours) are all represented as targets of SDG action.

For example, girls’ access to education (linked to SDG 4, quality education) has a measurable impact on their own, and their children’s, health outcomes. The beneficial effect of education can be affected by macro-level political and economic forces which result in contraction of welfare provision (including health-system cuts), wage depression and food insecurity. These factors are included in SDGs 1 (no poverty); 2 (zero hunger), 8 (decent work and economic growth) and 10 (reduced inequalities) and all have been shown to have adverse effects on child and maternal health. Similarly, rapid privatization programmes in post-communist countries (linked to SDG 9, industry, renovation and infrastructure) have shaped gendered differences in mortality over and above the micro-level determinants of health. SDG 8 (for promoting economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all) is strongly linked to health and gender., Examples of interactions among SDGs 3 and 5 and other SDGs are provided in Table 1.

Health behaviours

Sociocultural norms and related patterns of behaviours differ according to gender. These can affect health behaviours in different ways for a variety of conditions. There is growing recognition of the roles in risk-taking played by sociocultural norms and related qualities and patterns of behaviours traditionally associated with being a man (referred to as masculinity). The behaviours include avoiding condom use, greater use of harmful substances and lower rates of seeking testing and treatment for HIV. These expressions of masculinity can also impact on the health of girls and women, for example through violence, sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancies. In terms of differential exposure to products that are harmful to health (SDG 12, responsible consumption and production), longitudinal studies point to tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption as key contributors to excess male mortality. However, current patterns in the consumption of tobacco and alcohol by sex are changing, with commercial strategies to expand sales of products increasingly targeting women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries., There is evidence that the proportion of females using alcohol is increasing, notably among young adults, with increases in related harm.

Aside from differences in health behaviours related to exposure to a range of illnesses, gender is also associated with responses to symptoms and signs of illness. Studies have shown that women are more likely to seek health care than men do, even after adjusting for reproductive health consultations. Other factors, however, such as women’s lack of autonomy to make out-of-pocket payments for health care, can inhibit women’s access to health care.

Health systems

Health systems themselves are not gender-neutral. The role of gender within health systems relates to concepts of universal health coverage (SDG 3), pathways of care including the impact of gender stereotypes and gender-related stigma that drive inequalities (SDG 10, reduced inequalities), principles of accountability and inclusivity (SDG 16, peace, justice and strong institutions), and the gendered experience of the health workforce itself (SDG 8, decent work and economic growth; SDG 16, peace, justice and strong institutions). However, there are concerns that decision-makers in the global health system are not well-prepared to understand, and effectively respond to, the structural, social, commercial and frequently gendered determinants of the major emerging burdens of disease. This is especially true for those determinants associated with environmental degradation, poor urban planning and unsustainable patterns of consumption. A recent analysis revealed the extent and nature of low gender awareness in the emergency responses to Ebola and Zika virus epidemics and in longer-term planning for health-system resilience (Table 1).

It has been estimated that at least half of the world’s 7.3 billion people do not receive the essential health services they need, with substantial unmet need for a range of specific interventions. SDG target 3.8 on achieving universal health coverage (UHC) aims to ensure that all people have access to quality health services, while also protecting against exposure to financial hardship. Financed by domestic public sources, UHC is a key strategic priority for strengthening health systems, and for the equitable and effective provision of needed, available, affordable and gender-sensitive health and social care.

UHC is based on concepts of equity, as set out in SDGs 1 (no poverty), 4 (quality education), 5 (gender equality), 8 (decent work and economic growth) and 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions). However, recent analysis has shown that even a well-functioning health-care system that is making progress towards UHC is not automatically equitable and gender-balanced. Unless explicit attention is paid to gender and the other intersectional drivers of inequalities, UHC may fail to improve equity. UHC may even exacerbate gender inequity since some groups of the population have greater health needs, but lower financing capabilities than others. Monitoring UHC focuses on two discrete components of health-system performance: levels of effective coverage; and financial risk protection. Table 1 provides some examples of how gender interacts with these two components.

In terms of effective coverage, health systems can monitor health inequalities covered by SDG target 5.1 (end all forms of discrimination against women and girls everywhere). They can also monitor other dimensions of inequity relevant in national contexts, such as defined in SDG 10 (reduced inequalities) and SDG target 17.18 (by 2020, enhance capacity-building support to developing countries…to increase significantly the availability of high-quality, timely and reliable data disaggregated by income, gender, age, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic location and other characteristics relevant in national contexts). To achieve UHC, the health-system response must include comprehensive analyses to document who is being left behind in service access and to find out why.

The structures and processes of oppression and discrimination that exist in society will also play out within health systems. Entrenched gender-based discrimination affects the global health workforce, most whom are women. Discrimination in different areas of the health-care services is evidenced by gender pay gaps, lack of formal employment, physical and sexual violence, and lack of representation in leadership and decision-making. Health-system strengthening needs to better address how gender, power and social status can shape who is chosen as a health worker. At the very least, the health system should adopt good human rights practice to do no harm. It should ensure that it does not replicate or amplify local, often highly gendered, power dynamics that exclude or discriminate against certain population groups, including women, ethnic minorities and others.

Synergies and interactions

While there is an implicit logic that the SDGs interact with and depend on each other, there is little consideration of how this works to support more coherent and effective decision-making to better facilitate monitoring, evaluation and evidence-informed action. A recent detailed analysis of interactions across the SDGs did consider SDG 3 along with SDGs 2 (zero hunger), 7 (affordable and clean energy) and 14 (conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development). However, the analysis did not contain detailed analysis of the interactions, enabling or otherwise, with SDG 5.

Another analysis looked at six sectors, family planning; maternal, newborn and child health; nutrition; agriculture; water, sanitation and hygiene; and financial services for the poor, across 76 studies in low- and middle-income countries. The study showed that gender equality and indicators of women’s and girls’ empowerment were associated with improvements in a variety of health and development outcomes. Furthermore, these associations were cross-sectoral, suggesting that to fully realize the benefits of promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment, the development community must collaborate in coordinated and integrated ways across multiple sectors.

Conclusion

Realizing the right to health and well-being of all people by acting on existing gender inequities and their complex determinants is challenging. Several factors hinder progress. There is a tendency for government departments and development partners to take ownership of particular goals, including SDG 3. Action is needed that is multidisciplinary (for example, going beyond medicine to include social sciences, statistics or political economy), multisectoral (involving different sectors of government, not just the health sector or health ministry) and multistakeholder (going beyond government to include, for example, civil society, private sector and academia). It can be argued that SDG 5’s concept of gender is narrow, referring mainly to women and focusing on limited roles: as mothers, as caregivers and as victims of violence. There is little incentive therefore for countries to adopt a more holistic, gender-equal and progressively universal approach. Outdated understandings of gender fail to explicitly acknowledge and address the underlying power and hierarchy relations between men and women that shape their health through a complex interplay of health determinants, behaviours and health-system responses. More attention is also needed to how masculinities as collective patterns of behaviour affect men’s as well as women’s health.

Although studies and official statistics may strive to report sex-disaggregated statistical differences in health (as required in SDG target 17.18) this is not equivalent to showing the impact of gender in driving those differences. We need additional, more nuanced, qualitative analyses of gender influences in their specific contexts, involving participants as individuals. For example, studies that focus on understanding how sex-disaggregated differences are shaped by social inequalities and power differentials rooted in gender norms. Such analysis can also help shape the transformation of gender as it promotes or hinders equity as a means to health.

This paper has sought to unpack the complex relationship between gender and health equity across three domains: social determinants, health behaviours and health-system responses. These domains in turn will impact on, and be influenced by, progress across all SDGs, and not just SDGs 3 and 5. We conclude that those seeking to achieve SDG 3 need to shift their thinking and action in several areas, as outlined in Box 1. We propose an action agenda to improve health equity outcomes while also advancing gender equality and women’s empowerment. Adopting this agenda will accelerate progress for all people, in all their diversities, to realize to their fullest potential, their right to health and well-being across their life course.

1. Move beyond equating gender with women. Global, national and local health policy needs to take account of how the roles, behaviours, activities, attributes and opportunities of males and females are based on different levels of power. This understanding of gender as a social and relational construct of power amplifies inequities in health for everyone and intersects with other drivers of inequities.

2. Adopt a holistic approach to analysis and action on gender. This approach will intersect with three domains of health: social determinants; health-seeking behaviour; and service delivery and health-system responses, and hence across the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Applying gender to one of these domains alone will fail to address inequities in health efficiently.

3. Invest in more gender analysis of sex-disaggregated data, alongside other stratifiers of social and health inequity. Global health journals should encourage authors to include a gender analysis of sex-disaggregated data, including how the social construction of masculinities and femininities shape men’s and women’s health.

4. Acknowledge and act on the gendered nature of the health workforce. Formulate gender-sensitive policies and health professional regulations through all levels of health governance to ensure gender parity, increased leadership roles for women and decent conditions of work for all.

5. Break down the isolated policy structures between different government sectors and programme areas and build a broad multi-stakeholder coalition for gender in global health. Such a coalition will aim to transcend narrow disease-focused approaches and engage more with civil society and with policymakers beyond ministries of health.,

6. Support transparency and accountability mechanisms at the country level. This can be done through strengthening a gendered health focus in voluntary national reviews, United Nations development assistance frameworks, and national health sector plans and programmes, building on the approach developed by Global Health 50/50.

References 56

  1. 1.

    Life expectancy. Global Health Observatory (GHO) data [internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/life_tables/situation_trends_text/en/ [cited 2018 Feb 20].

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    GBD Compare. Data visualization hub [internet]. Seattle: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, 2016. Available from: http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare [cited 2018 Jan 20].

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Gender and blindness. Gender and health information sheet [internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. Available from: http://www.who.int/gender-equity-rights/knowledge/a85574/en [cited 2018 Mar 5].

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Colchero F, Rau R, Jones OR, Barthold JA, Conde DA, Lenart A, et al. The emergence of longevous populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016 11 29;113(48):E7681–90.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1612191113

  5. 5.

    The health consequences of smoking: 50 years of progress. A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. Accessible from: https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/full-report.pdf[cited 2018 Jan 20].

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Cullen MR, Baiocchi M, Eggleston K, Loftus P, Fuchs V. The weaker sex? Vulnerable men and women’s resilience to socio-economic disadvantage. SSM Popul Health. 2016 8 3;2:512–24.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.06.006

  7. 7.

    Magar V. Gender, health and the sustainable development goals. Bull World Health Organ. 2015 11 1;93(11):743.

    Not in our library10.2471/blt.15.165027

  8. 8.

    Sen G, Ostlin P. Unequal, unfair, ineffective, inefficient. Gender inequity in health: why it exists and how we can change it. Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. September 2007. Bangalore: IIM Bangalore and Karolinska Institute; 2007. Available from: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/csdh_media/wgekn_final_report_07.pdf [cited 2018 Mar 5].

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Reisner SL, Poteat T, Keatley J, Cabral M, Mothopeng T, Dunham E, et al. Global health burden and needs of transgender populations: a review. Lancet. 2016 7 23;388(10042):412–36.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00684-x

  10. 10.

    Hankivsky O. Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012 6;74(11):1712–20.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.029

  11. 11.

    Turning promises into action: gender equality in the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: UN Women; 2018. Available from: http://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/sdg-report [cited 2018 Feb 20].

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Resolution A/RES/70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. In: Seventieth United Nations General Assembly, New York, 25 September 2015. New York: United Nations; 2015. Available from: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E [cited 2018 Mar 5].

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Payne S. The health of men and women. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2006.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Hawkes S, Buse K. Gender and global health: evidence, policy, and inconvenient truths. Lancet. 2013 5 18;381(9879):1783–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60253-6

  15. 15.

    Paz Arauco V, Gazdar H, Hevia-Pacheco P, Kabeer N, Lenhardt A, Masood SQ, et al. Strengthening social justice to address intersecting inequalities-post 2015. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2014 Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273316413_Strengthening_social_justice_to_address_intersecting_inequalities_post-2015 [cited 2018 May 31].

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Sex, gender and influenza. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Available from: http://www.who.int/gender-equity-rights/knowledge/9789241500111/en/ [cited 2018 Mar 5].

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Gender, health and malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. Available from: http://www.who.int/gender/documents/gender_health_malaria.pdf [cited 2018 Mar 5].

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Davies S, Bennett B. A gendered human rights analysis of Ebola and Zika: locating gender in global health emergencies. Int Aff. 2016;92(5):1041–60.

    Not in our library10.1111/1468-2346.12704

  19. 19.

    Theobald S, MacPherson EE, Dean L, Jacobson J, Ducker C, Gyapong M, et al. 20 years of gender mainstreaming in health: lessons and reflections for the neglected tropical diseases community. BMJ Glob Health. 2017 11 12;2(4):e000512.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000512

  20. 20.

    Raine R. Does gender bias exist in the use of specialist health care? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 10;5(4):237–49.

    Not in our library10.1177/135581960000500409

  21. 21.

    Dey S, Flather MD, Devlin G, Brieger D, Gurfinkel EP, Steg PG, et al.; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events investigators. Sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart. 2009 1;95(1):20–6.

    Not in our library10.1136/hrt.2007.138537

  22. 22.

    Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in cardiovascular disease. In: Prigione S, Regitz-Zagrosek V, editors. Sex and gender aspects in clinical management. London: Springer Verlag; 2011 pp. 17–45.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Joint United Nations Statement on ending discrimination in health care settings. New York: United Nations; 2017. Available from: http://www.who.int/en/news-room/detail/27-06-2017-joint-united-nations-statement-on-ending-discrimination-in-health-care-settings [cited 2018 Apr 28].

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    World health report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: www.who.int/ageing/publications/world-report-2015/en [cited 2018 May 31].

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Barriers and facilitating factors in access to health services in Greece. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2015. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/287997/Barriers-and-facilitating-factors-in-access-to-health-services-in-Greece-rev1.pdf?ua=1 [cited 2018 May 31].

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Women on the move: migration, care work and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/gender-equity-rights/knowledge/women-on-the-move/en [cited 2018 May 30].

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Langer A, Meleis A, Knaul FM, Atun R, Aran M, Arreola-Ornelas H, et al. Women and Health: the key for sustainable development. Lancet. 2015 9 19;386(9999):1165–210.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60497-4

  28. 28.

    The global health 50/50 report: How gender-responsive are the world’s most influential global health organisations? London: Global Health 50/50; 2018. Available from: https://globalhealth5050.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/GH5050-Report-2018_Final.pdf [cited 2018 Mar 10].

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/en/index.html [cited 2018 Mar 5].

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Desai S, Alva S. Maternal education and child health: is there a strong causal relationship? Demography. 1998 2;35(1):71–81.

    Not in our library10.2307/3004028

  31. 31.

    Thomson M, Kentikelenis A, Stubbs T. Structural adjustment programmes adversely affect vulnerable populations: a systematic-narrative review of their effect on child and maternal health. Public Health Rev. 2017 7 10;38:13.

    Not in our library10.1186/s40985-017-0059-2

  32. 32.

    Scheiring G, Stefler D, Irdam D, Fazekas M, Azarova A, Kolesnikova I, et al. The gendered effects of foreign investment and prolonged state ownership on mortality in Hungary: an indirect demographic, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 1;6(1):e95–102.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30391-1

  33. 33.

    Basic principles of human rights monitoring. Manual of human rights monitoring. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; 2011. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Chapter02_MHRM.pdf [cited 2018 May 31].

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Improving employment and working conditions in health: report for discussion at the Tripartite Meeting on Improving Employment and Working Conditions in Health Services. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2017. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---sector/documents/publication/wcms_548288.pdf [cited 2018 May 31].

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Connell R. Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012 6;74(11):1675–83.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.006

  36. 36.

    Santana MC, Raj A, Decker MR, La Marche A, Silverman JG. Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. J Urban Health. 2006 7;83(4):575–85.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11524-006-9061-6

  37. 37.

    Wilsnack R, Wilsanck S, Obot I. Why study gender, alcohol and culture? Perspectives from low and middle income countries, Chapter 1 In: Obot IS, Room R, editors. Alcohol, gender and drinking problems. Perspectives from low and middle income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005 pp. 1–24.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Beltrán-Sánchez H, Finch CE, Crimmins EM. Twentieth century surge of excess adult male mortality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015 7 21;112(29):8993–8.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1421942112

  39. 39.

    Brown-Johnson CG, England LJ, Glantz SA, Ling PM. Tobacco industry marketing to low socioeconomic status women in the U.S.A. Tob Control. 2014 11;23 e2:e139–46.

    Not in our library10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051224

  40. 40.

    Slade T, Chapman C, Swift W, Keyes K, Tonks Z, Teesson M. Birth cohort trends in the global epidemiology of alcohol use and alcohol-related harms in men and women: systematic review and metaregression. BMJ Open. 2016 10 24;6(10):e011827.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011827

All 56 references

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.