The role of early invasive, selective invasive, or conservative strategies in acute coronary syndromes
Jean Vorster, Pravin Manga
SA Heart Journal · 2017
doi:10.24170/5-2-2046 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) comprises three related disorders. In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) rapid restoration of flow in the infarct-related artery (via pharmacological or mechanical means) is of paramount importance to minimize necrosis. In patients presenting with Unstable Angina / Non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) the correct choice of the initial treatment strategy (early invasive vs. selective invasive vs. conservative) is imperative in assuring optimal patient outcomes. Various risk prediction models can assist in the decision making process in an individual patient. The timing of angiography and revascularization in patients selected for the early invasive strategy are important factors in determining the long-term outcome in this patient population subset.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.