No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Which Intervention Characteristics are Related to More Exposure to Internet-Delivered Healthy Lifestyle Promotion Interventions? A Systematic Review

Wendy Brouwer, Willemieke Kroeze, Rik Crutzen and 4 more

Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2011 · Systematic review

Abstract

Background. The Internet has become a popular medium for the delivery of tailored healthy lifestyle promoting interventions. The actual reach of Internet-delivered interventions seems, however, lower than expected, and attrition from interventions is generally high. Characteristics of an intervention, such as personally tailored feedback and goal setting, are thought to be among the important factors related to of use of and exposure to interventions. However, there is no systematic overview of which characteristics of Internet-delivered interventions may be related to more exposure.

Objective. The present study aims to identify (1) which potentially exposure-promoting methods and strategies are used in existing Internet interventions, (2) which objective outcome measures are used to measure exposure to Internet interventions, and (3) which potentially exposure-promoting methods and strategies are associated with better exposure.

Methods. A systematic review of the literature was conducted based on the Cochrane guidelines. Papers published between 1995 and 2009 were searched in the PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases. In total, 64 studies were included that reported objective exposure measures such as completion of an initial visit, number of log-ins, and time spent on the website. Information about intervention-related characteristics (ie, interactive behavior change strategies, interactive elements for fun, peer or counsel support, email/phone contact, and regular updates of the website) that could potentially contribute to better exposure and objective exposure outcomes were abstracted from the studies and qualitative systematic descriptive analyses were performed.

Results. The results showed that a large variety of behavior change techniques and other exposure-promoting elements were used in the interventions and that these methods and strategies varied for the various lifestyle behaviors. Feedback, interactive elements, and email/phone contact were used most often. In addition, there was much variety and a lack of consistency in the exposure measures that were reported. Of all the categories of intervention characteristics that may be associated with better exposure, there were indications that peer and counselor support result in a longer website visit and that email/phone contact and updates of the website result in more log-ins.

Conclusions. Results of this qualitative systematic review indicate that of all intervention characteristics that could potentially enhance exposure, only peer support, counselor support, email/phone contact with visitors, and updates of the intervention website were related to better exposure. The diversity of intervention methods used and the inconsistency in the report of exposure measures prevented us from drawing firmer conclusions. More research is needed to identify whether other characteristics of Internet interventions are associated with greater exposure.

References 103

1.
Leung L. Internet embeddedness: links with online health information seeking, expectancy value/quality of health information websites, and Internet usage patterns. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(5):565-9.
Not in our library10.1089/cpb.2007.0189
2.
Tu HT, Cohen GR. Striking jump in consumers seeking health care information. Track Rep. 2008;(20):1-8.
Not in our library
3.
Fox S. Online health search. 2006.
Not in our library
4.
Brouwer W, Oenema A, Raat H, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J. Characteristics of visitors and revisitors to an Internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention implemented for use by the general public. Health Educ Res. 2010;25(4):585-95.
Not in our library10.1093/her/cyp063
5.
Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(4 Suppl):1028S-1034S.
Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/77.4.1028s
6.
Brug J, Oenema A, Kroeze W, Raat H. The internet and nutrition education: challenges and opportunities. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59 Suppl 1:S130-7; discussion S138.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602186
7.
De Nooijer J, Oenema A, Kloek G, Brug H, de Vries H, de Vries NK. Bevordering van gezond gedrag via het Internet: nu en in de toekomst [Promotion of healthy behavior through the Internet: now and in the future]. 2005.
Not in our library
8.
Evers KE, Prochaska JM, Prochaska JO, Driskell MM, Cummins CO, Velicer WF. Strenghts and Weaknesses of Health Behavior Change Programs on the Internet. Journal of Health Psychology. 2003;8(1):63-70.
Not in our library10.1177/1359105303008001435
9.
Kreuter M, Farrell D, Olevitch L, Brennan L. Tailoring health messages: Customizing communication with computer technology. 2000.
Not in our library
10.
Internet World Stats.
Not in our library
11.
Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yaroch AL, Atienza AA. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(4):336-345.
Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.007
12.
van den Berg MH, Schoones JW, Vliet Vlieland TP. Internet-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3):e26.
Not in our library10.2196/jmir.9.3.e26
13.
Vandelanotte C, Spathonis KM, Eakin EG, Owen N. Website-delivered physical activity interventions a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(1):54-64.
Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.041
14.
Walters ST, Wright JA, Shegog R. A review of computer and Internet-based interventions for smoking behavior. Addict Behav. 2006;31(2):264-77.
Not in our library10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.002
15.
Weinstein PK. A review of weight loss programs delivered via the Internet. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006;21(4):251-8; quiz 259.
Not in our library10.1097/00005082-200607000-00003
16.
Leslie E, Marshall AL, Owen N, Bauman A. Engagement and retention of participants in a physical activity website. Prev Med. 2005;40(1):54-9.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.002
17.
Glasgow RE. eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(5 Suppl):S119-26.
Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.023
18.
Campbell MK, Tessaro I, DeVellis B, Benedict S, Kelsey K, Belton L, Sanhueza A. Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: health works for women. Prev Med. 2002;34(3):313-23.
Not in our library10.1006/pmed.2001.0988
19.
Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e11.
Not in our library10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11
20.
Danaher BG, McKay HG, Seeley JR. The information architecture of behavior change websites. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(2):e12.
Not in our library10.2196/jmir.7.2.e12
21.
Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Kearney KA, Reid R, Ritzwoller DP, Strecher VJ, Couper MP, Green B, Wildenhaus K. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e11.
Not in our library10.2196/jmir.9.2.e11
22.
Lenert L, Muñoz RF, Stoddard J, Delucchi K, Bansod A, Skoczen S, Pérez-Stable EJ. Design and pilot evaluation of an internet smoking cessation program. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):16-20.
Not in our library10.1197/jamia.m1128
23.
Verheijden MW, Jans MP, Hildebrandt VH, Hopman-Rock M. Rates and determinants of repeated participation in a web-based behavior change program for healthy body weight and healthy lifestyle. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(1):e1.
Not in our library10.2196/jmir.9.1.e1
24.
Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(4):e40.
Not in our library10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40
25.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th edition. 1995.
Not in our library
26.
An Exploration of Factors Related to Dissemination of and Exposure to Internet-Delivered Behavior Change Interventions Aimed at Adults: A Delphi Study Approach · 2008
Not checked
27.
Brouwer W, Oenema A, Crutzen R, De Nooijer J, De Vries NK, Brug J. What makes people decide to visit and use an Internet-delivered behavior-change intervention? A qualitative study among adults. Health Education. 2009;109:460-73.
Not in our library10.1108/09654280911001149
28.
Ferney SL, Marshall AL, Eakin EG, Owen N. Randomized trial of a neighborhood environment-focused physical activity website intervention. Prev Med. 2009;48(2):144-50.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.022
29.
Periodic Prompts and Reminders in Health Promotion and Health Behavior Interventions: Systematic Review · 2009
No notice
30.
Napolitano MA, Fotheringham M, Tate D, Sciamanna C, Leslie E, Owen N, Bauman A, Marcus B. Evaluation of an internet-based physical activity intervention: a preliminary investigation. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25(2):92-9.
Not in our library10.1207/s15324796abm2502_04
31.
Severson HH, Gordon JS, Danaher BG, Akers L. ChewFree.com: evaluation of a Web-based cessation program for smokeless tobacco users. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(2):381-91.
Not in our library10.1080/14622200701824984
32.
Danaher BG, Boles SM, Akers L, Gordon JS, Severson HH. Defining participant exposure measures in Web-based health behavior change programs. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e15.
Not in our library10.2196/jmir.8.3.e15
33.
Higgins JPT, Green SE. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. 2009.
Not in our library
34.
Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008;27(3):379-87.
Not in our library10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379
35.
Estabrooks CA, Field PA, Morse JM. Aggregating qualitative findings: an approach to theory development. Qualitative Health Research. 1994;4(4):503-511.
Not in our library10.1177/104973239400400410
36.
Carr LJ, Bartee RT, Dorozynski C, Broomfield JF, Smith ML, Smith DT. Internet-delivered behavior change program increases physical activity and improves cardiometabolic disease risk factors in sedentary adults: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2008;46(5):431-8.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.12.005
37.
Dunton GF, Robertson TP. A tailored Internet-plus-email intervention for increasing physical activity among ethnically-diverse women. Prev Med. 2008;47(6):605-11.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.004
38.
Herman CW, Musich S, Lu C, Sill S, Young JM, Edington DW. Effectiveness of an incentive-based online physical activity intervention on employee health status. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(9):889-95.
Not in our library10.1097/01.jom.0000232526.27103.71
39.
Hurling R, Catt M, Boni MD, Fairley BW, Hurst T, Murray P, Richardson A, Sodhi JS. Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e7.
Not in our library10.2196/jmir.9.2.e7
40.
Hurling R, Fairley BW, Dias M. Internet-based exercise intervention systems: Are more interactive designs better? Psychology and Health. 2006;21(6):757-772.
Not in our library10.1080/14768320600603257

All 103 references

Cited by papers we hold 19

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.